*doi+eprint+url\newunit\newunit \DeclareSourcemap \maps[datatype=bibtex, overwrite] \map \step[fieldset=editor, null]
On a classification of planar functions in characteristic three
Abstract
Planar functions are functions over a finite field that have optimal combinatorial properties and they have applications in several branches of mathematics, including algebra, projective geometry and cryptography. There are two relevant equivalence relations for planar functions, that are isotopic equivalence and CCZ-equivalence. Classification of planar functions is performed via CCZ-equivalence which arises from cryptographic applications. In the case of quadratic planar functions, isotopic equivalence, coming from connections to commutative semifields, is more general than CCZ-equivalence and isotopic transformations can be considered as a construction method providing up to two CCZ-inequivalent map**s. In this paper, we first survey known infinite classes and sporadic cases of planar functions up to CCZ-equivalence, aiming to exclude equivalent cases and to identify those with the potential to provide additional functions via isotopic equivalence. In particular, for fields of order with , we completely resolve if and when isotopic equivalence provides different CCZ-classes for all currently known planar functions. Further, we perform an extensive computational investigation on some of these fields and find seven new sporadic planar functions over and two over . Finally, we give new simple quadrinomial representatives for the Dickson family of planar functions.
Keywords: planar functions, semifields, classification, equivalence
1 Introduction
Functions over finite fields have numerous applications in many areas of research within mathematics and computer science. Notably, they have been heavily studied for the design of cryptographic ciphers. For many years, the design of cryptographic ciphers has been mostly based on binary fields, due to the efficiency of implementing binary operations in hardware and software. More recently there has been a renewed interest in the case of odd characteristic, especially for building MPC-friendly cryptography primitives and in the field of side-channel countermeasures, see Grassi, Rechberger, Rotaru, Scholl and Smart [GRRSS-2016-mfskp] or Masure, Méaux, Moos and Standaert [MMMS-2023-eaemi] for example. Thus, it seems desirable to investigate functions over finite fields of odd characteristic with useful cryptographic properties. In 1989, Meier and Staffelbach [MS-1989-nlccs] showed the importance of using highly nonlinear functions in designing cryptographic primitives. Moreover, after the discovery of differential cryptanalysis by Biham and Shamir [BS-1991-dcodl] in 1991, Nyberg [N-1993-dumic] introduced the mathematical concept of differential uniformity of a function between finite fields with the idea that functions with optimal differential uniformity would provide the strongest resistance to differential cryptanalysis. In binary fields, the optimal differential uniformity is , and functions obtaining this optimal value are called Almost Perfect Nonlinear (APN) functions. Over fields of odd characteristics, the optimal differential uniformity is 1, and functions that obtain this value are called Perfect Nonlinear (PN) or planar functions. The applications of planar functions, however, are not limited to their possible uses in cryptography. Indeed, when Dembowski and Ostrom [DO-1968-poowc] first introduced planar functions in 1968 as tools for constructing projective planes admitting collineation groups with specific properties. Additionally, Coulter and Henderson [CH-2008-cpas] established a 1-to-1 correspondence between commutative presemifields of odd order and quadratic planar functions. This connection was subsequently used by Budaghyan and Helleseth [BH-2011-ncsdb] to construct the first new infinite family of commutative semifields of arbitrary odd characteristic since the 1950s.
Information about the known families and constructions of planar functions (and commutative semifields) is scattered. There has not been a serious attempt to provide an exhaustive survey of the known classes over small fields since 2010, when Pott and Zhou [PZ-2010-scopf] gave an account of what was known up to CCZ-equivalence for fields of order with . There is also some confusion over the historical record, in part because some papers introducing “new” examples of planar functions have failed to fully address the question of equivalence with known classes. A central motivation of this paper is to rectify the above two problems by presenting, as best we can, a complete picture of the current state of knowledge with regards to planar functions over fields of order with . As part of this account, we give a nomenclature of the known families of planar functions, which is as accurate as it can be. With this, we hope to provide a complete account of the current situation, including whatever is known about the intersections between the known families. Following a section on background material and notation, this nomenclature is given in Section 3 along with explanations and remarks.
In Section 4 we introduce new planar DO polynomials representing the Dickson semifields. The best previous representatives for the entire class were all hexanomials. We use a linear transformation on that previous class to reduce them to quadrinomials. Our motivation stems from the fact that most computations involving equivalence are made easier by two things, namely reducing the number of terms of the polynomials involved and restricting the coefficients of the polynomials to as small a subfield as possible.
Finally, in Section 5 we turn to our central goal of giving a complete account of the current knowledge of planar functions, up to CCZ-equivalence, over fields of order with . The latest effort to produce such a classification, to the best of our knowledge, was made by Pott and Zhou in 2010 [PZ-2010-scopf], who gave a classification up to CCZ-equivalence of all planar functions known at the time in characteristic 3, for dimensions up to 6. We update this classification, adding the representatives of families and sporadic instances discovered in the intervening years. Testing for equivalence in dimensions larger than 6 has been exceedingly difficult until the recent discovery of a more efficient equivalence test by Ivkovic and Kaleyski [IK-2022-darle]. Using this improved equivalence test, we have expanded the classification up to dimension 11. Notably, we find that the Coulter-Henderson-Cosick(CHK) semifield [CHK-2007-ppfcs], considered a sporadic instance until now, belongs to the Budaghyan-Helleseth family [BH-2008-npnmo]. We classify planar functions up to CCZ-equivalence because it is the natural equivalence relation to consider when investigating differential properties. However, for quadratic planar functions, there is a more general equivalence relation based on the isotopy of the corresponding semifields, namely isotopic equivalence. The families presented in Section 3 are equivalent with respect to isotopic equivalence. This means that a complete classification, consistent with the list of families provided is only possible if we investigate the number of CCZ-classes (or, equivalently, strong isotopic equivalence classes), inside the isotopic equivalence classes. The Coulter-Henderson Theorem [CH-2008-cpas] provides necessary conditions for an isotopic equivalence class to split into two strong isotopic equivalence classes, as well as conditions on the form of isotopisms that are not also strong isotopisms. Using the latter, we can computationally prove whether an isotopy class splits into two strong isotopy classes for . We do so either by finding a split or by exhausting the search space for possible isotopisms. We find that some of the instances of the Budaghyan-Helleseth (BH) family and the instances of the Cohen-Ganley (CG) family over define isotopic equivalence classes that split into two strong isotopic equivalence classes. To the best of our knowledge, this was not previously known. The complete account, along with tables of the invariants used, is reported in the tables of Appendix A. With this in place, we proceed to search for new planar functions up to CCZ-equivalence. Our approach is to perform an expansion search, a procedure analogous to the one employed by Aleksandersen, Budaghyan and Kaleyski [ABK-2022-sfafb] for APN functions. This procedure, and the complete results of the searches, are outlined in Section 5.1. As a result of this search, we find seven new CCZ-inequivalent examples of sporadic planar functions over and two over . Finding so many new examples of planar functions over such a low dimension is a little surprsing, and we believe a more involved computational search might reveal even more instances. Additionally, we find that some of the new instances belong to an isotopy class that splits into two CCZ-equivalence classes.
2 Preliminaries
This section introduces the necessary background on planar function and semifields, as well as establishing notation. We refer the reader to Budaghyan [B-2014-caaoc, Chapter 2] for further details.
2.1 Planar functions
Let be an odd prime and be a positive integer. We denote by the finite field with elements, and by the -dimensional vector space over . It is well known that one can identify the vector space with the field through the use of a basis over . Let be a divisor of we denote the trace function of over as . Moreover, we denote by the absolute trace function.
Any function can be represented uniquely as a univariate polynomial of the form
(1) |
where . For any positive integer strictly less than , we set to be equal to for an appropriate choice of such that . We denote by the algebraic degree of , that is defined as
where the are as in (1). If has algebraic degree at most , then is called affine and if additionally we also say that is linear. If has algebraic degree (resp. ), then is said to be quadratic (resp. cubic). The function is called Dembrowski-Ostrom (DO) polynomial if all the non-zero terms in its polynomial representation have algebraic degree , that is
where . We denote by the derivative of in direction ,
Let be a positive integer. A function is differentially -uniform if
A -uniform function is also called a Perfect Nonlinear (PN) function or planar function. In the case of being a DO polynomial, then is planar if and only if for all the only solution to the equation is
2.2 Semifields
Let be a nonempty set and be two binary operations over . Then is called a presemifield if the following holds
-
•
is an Abelian group;
-
•
For any , we have that and that ;
-
•
If are such that , then or .
If there exists such that for all , then is called a semifield. In 1965, Knuth [K-1965-fsapp] showed that the additive group of a presemifield is isomorphic to the additive group of a finite field . So we can always represent a presemifield as , where is the usual addition over the finite field . Moreover, any finite field is also a semifield with the usual multiplication.
Two presemifields and are called isotopic if there are three linear permutations , , and of such that for any . If , then and are called strongly isotopic. Every finite commutative presemifield is isotopic to a finite commutative semifield where we choose any and we set
Then . We observe that and are strongly isotopic by using the transformation where is the identity function over .
The left, middle and right nucleus of a finite semifield are denoted by, respectively,
We denote by the nucleus of . If and are isotopic, then their nuclei (left, middle, right, and the nucleus) have the same order. We have that if is commutative, then because and .
When is odd, Coulter and Henderson [CH-2008-cpas] showed there is a 1-to-1 correspondence between finite commutative semifields and planar DO polynomials which can be realised in the following way. From any finite commutative presemifield we can obtain a planar DO polynomial by . Conversely, any planar DO polynomial defines a commutative presemifield via field addition and multiplication given by .
2.3 Equivalence relations of functions
Let and be two functions over . The functions and are said to be:
-
•
affine equivalent (resp. linear equivalent) if there are two affine (resp. linear) permutations and over such that ;
-
•
Extended Affine equivalent, or EA-equivalent, if there is an affine function over such that is affine equivalent to .
-
•
Carlet, Charpin and Zinoviev equivalent, or CCZ-equivalent, if there is an affine permutation over map** to . Where by we denote the graph of the function , .
We specify that CCZ-equivalence is strictly more general than EA-equivalence (any pair of functions that are EA-equivalent are also CCZ-equivalent, but not necessarily vice-versa); EA-equivalence is strictly more general than affine equivalence; and affine equivalence is strictly more general than linear equivalence.
Dempwolff [U-2018-ceopf] proved that two monomial functions and are CCZ-equivalent if and only if they are cyclotomic equivalent, that is there exists a positive integer such that or if is invertible modulo . Budaghyan and Helleseth [BH-2008-npnmo] proved that the equivalence relations linear, affine, EA, and CCZ all coincide for planar DO polynomials over . Two planar DO polynomials and are strongly isotopic if and only if they are CCZ-equivalent, and any isotopic class contains at most two CCZ-equivalence classes. The following theorem gives more insights on this topic.
Theorem 1 (Coulter Henderson [CH-2008-cpas]).
Let and be two commutative presemifields where is a prime and is a positive integer. Let and be two commutative semifields strongly isotopic respectively to and . Suppose that and are isotopic. Let and . Then one of the following holds
-
•
If is odd, then and are strongly isotopic.
-
•
If is even, then either and are strongly isotopic or all isotopisms from to are such that where is a non-square (w.r.t. to the multiplication ) or, equivalently, .
Moreover, if is odd, the notion of strong isotopism coincides with the one of isotopism for commutative presemifields.
One important implication of this theorem is that if the dimension of the middle nucleus over the left nucleus of a commutative semifield is even, then the isotopy class of the semifield can split into two strong isotopy classes. Consequently, we have checked all situations where this might be possible as part of our accounting of the known classes of planar polynomials that we give below. While this may sound computationally difficult, in practice it is not, as the specific format of the splitting scenario outlined in the theorem means we need only check the isotopisms with a non-square. This observation is not new, having already been used by Zhou [Z-2012-anoti] for example. Moreover, one can improve the computational investigation by taking only one representative in each coset where non-square. Indeed, for any the two isotopism and give strongly isotopic semifields because
A property that is preserved by an equivalence relation is called an invariant. In particular, if a property is preserved by linear equivalence (respectively, affine, EA, CCZ, isotopic), then it is a linear invariant (respectively, affine, EA, CCZ, isotopic). Invariants can be useful to speed up equivalence tests because functions with a different value for an invariant must be inequivalent. Not many invariants are known for planar DO polynomials over , but some have been useful in past research. Firstly, the orders of the various nuclei of any commutative semifield constructed from are isotopic invariants. Now define a linear code with generator matrix
The monomial automorphism group, or automorphism group for short, is the group of monomial matrices that map the code to itself. A monomial matrix is an invertible matrix where each column has exactly one non-zero entry. Pott and Zhou [PZ-2010-scopf] showed that the order of the monomial automorphism group of is a CCZ-invariant. Finally, we consider the set of linear self-equivalences of , , that is the set of pairs of linear permutations such that . The right orbit of with respect to the set of linear self-equivalences is defined as the set
The multiset of the cardinalities of each orbit is a linear invariant [IK-2022-darle].
3 On the known families of Planar Functions
In this section we address the nomenclature of planar functions. Our aim is to clarify any confusion there may be in the literature regarding precedent and discovery while at the same time explaining our naming convention and hopefully standardizing the names of known families. We do this in part to address the recent proliferation of claims of new planar functions, especially over the last decade, which have since been verified as being examples of known families. The result of Coulter and Henderson [CH-2008-cpas] linking planar DO polynomials with commutative semifields does complicate the history a little, but we are somewhat fortunate in the sense that almost no planar DO polynomials known at the time of the discovery corresponded with known families of commutative semifields. That said, given the equivalence, any families are named after whatever came first, whether that be a semifield or a planar function.
Finally, we note that in her Ph.D. thesis [K-2009-csooo], Kosick determines planar DO polynomial representatives for all of the commutative semifield families discovered before 2009. Specifically, planar DO polynomial representatives are given for the Dickson, Cohen-Ganley, Ganley families, as well as the sporadic example of Pentilla and Williams. See also the unpublished paper [CHHKXZ-2007-ppacs] which, among other things, gives a family of planar DO binomials that represent a subset of the Dickson semifields.
-
1893
FF – Finite fields
-
•
given by
-
•
Planar DO representative:
-
•
.
The monomial is planar over any field, finite or infinite, which is not of characteristic 2. It is easily seen to be equivalent to the field on which it is defined. We give 1893 as the year as it was then that Moore first established the uniqueness of finite fields of arbitrary order, thereby completing their classification, see [M-1893-adiso, M-1896-adiso].
-
•
-
1906
D – The commutative semifields of Dickson
-
•
given by
Here, is a nonsquare and .
-
•
Different choices of lead to non-isotopic classes, while the two integers and yield isotopic semifields, see Burmester [B-1962-otcna].
-
•
For fixed i, all non-square produce isotopic semifields, see [D-1906-oclai].
-
•
There are multiple choices for the planar DO representatives for this class. Perhaps the best general forms known prior to this article are those given by Kosick [K-2009-csooo] (see Lemma 2 below). Also, a notable one is in binomial form [CHHKXZ-2007-ppacs] but has many restrictions (see Lemma 1 below). In this article, we shall establish a class of quadrinomials that can be used as the representatives, see Theorem 2.
-
•
.
Dickson produced his family of commutative semifields in 1906 in [D-1906-oclai]. (Note that a typo in Dembowski’s book [bD-1968-fg], page 241, inadvertently cites his nearfield paper [D-1905-ofa] instead.) He was motivated by his work [D-1905-ofa] from the previous year in which he was the first to construct nearfields (a division ring where only one of the two distributive laws holds), describing an infinite family, along with a further 7 sporadic examples. That he had described all possible nearfields was only confirmed in 1935 by Zassenhaus [Z-1935-ubef]. It is, perhaps, worth mentioning that in 1907 Veblen and Wedderburn [VW-1907-ndanp] used Dickson’s nearfields to construct the first known examples of non-Desarguesian projective planes, and that their construction could also have used Dickson’s commutative semifields.
-
•
-
1952
A – Albert’s twisted fields
-
•
given by
-
•
Planar DO representative:
where with odd.
-
•
Different choices of lead to non-isotopic classes, see [A-1952-onda].
-
•
.
Albert’s twisted fields were first published in [A-1952-onda], and subsequently generalised and extensively studied by him in the papers [A-1960-fdaaf, A-1961-gtf, A-1961-ifgtf, A-1963-otcga]. The form of the equivalent planar monomials, the DO monomials, were first described by Dembowski and Ostrom [DO-1968-poowc], but with an erroneous condition, subsequently corrected by Coulter and Matthews in [CM-1997-pfapo]. Note that both Albert’s original construction and the DO monomial examples include the finite field case as an example.
-
•
-
1982
CG – The commutative semifields of Cohen and Ganley
-
•
given by
Here, , and is a nonsquare.
-
•
All non-square produce isotopic semifields, see [CG-1982-cstdo].
-
•
Planar DO representative over :
Here odd, , , , and .
-
•
Each member of this family is isotopic inequivalent to the Dickson (D) family.
-
•
There are multiple choices for the planar DO representatives for this class. The planar DO representatives we use here were given by Kosick [K-2009-csooo]. We remark that there is a typo in the DO representatives given by Kosick, but the proofs are correct for the forms we give.
-
•
.
They were first constructed by Cohen and Ganley [CG-1982-cstdo], in their study of a general construction method for commutative semifields two dimensional over their middle nuclei.
-
•
-
1982
G – The commutative semifields of Ganley
-
•
given by
Here, odd.
-
•
Planar DO representative over :
Here odd, , , , , and .
-
•
There are multiple choices for the planar DO representatives for this class. The planar DO representatives we use here were given by Kosick [K-2009-csooo]. As for the CG family, we remark that there is a typo in the DO representatives given by Kosick, but the proofs are correct for the forms we give.
-
•
.
Building on the work in [CG-1982-cstdo], Ganley used the concept of weak nuclei to produce the commutative semifields in [G-1981-cwns].
-
•
-
1997
CM – The planar monomials of Coulter and Matthews
-
•
Planar DO representative over :
Here, is odd and .
These are the only non-DO examples of planar functions known, and as they are not DO polynomials, they do not produce commutative semifields. The Coulter-Matthews monomials were announced on an online forum in 1994 and presented in full at Fq3, the 3rd International Conference on Finite Fields and Applications, in Glasgow in July, 1995. Delays in publication meant that Coulter and Matthews’ results only appeared in print in 1997 in [CM-1997-pfapo]. In the same year, Helleseth and Sandberg [HS-1997-spmwl] published a paper which included the Coulter-Matthews examples. However, precedent was confirmed publicly by Tor Helleseth at BFA 2018, the third International Workshop on Boolean Functions and Their Application, in Loen in June 2018. We are most grateful to Tor for the clarification. These are the only known non-quadratic planar. It is known that if a quadratic function is CCZ-equivalent to a monomial, then such monomial must be quadratic. To check CCZ-equivalence among monomials, it is enough to check that their exponents belong to the same cyclotomic set. Since EA coincides with CCZ for planar functions, we can classify the instances of CM separately from the quadratic planar functions.
-
•
-
1997
TST – The Ten-Six-Two family of planar DO polynomials
-
•
Planar DO representative over :
Here, odd.
-
•
The two functions are inequivalent up to strong isotopism, see [CH-2008-cpas].
-
•
.
The Ten-Six-Two family of functions are so named for their form: , where denotes the th Dickson polynomial of the first kind. (For information regarding the Dickson polynomials of the first and second kind, see the monograph [bLMT-1993-dp] of Lidl, Mullen and Turnwald.) Coulter and Matthews established the planarity of in [CM-1997-pfapo]. Ding and Yuan [DY-2006-afosh] extended the proof to all in 2007 as part of their disproof of a 70 year old conjecture on skew Hadamard difference sets. Coulter and Henderson [CH-2008-cpas] settled the question of equivalence by showing there are two equivalence families, one for all square and one for all non-square . Thus, one can use to describe the two families.
-
•
-
2000
PW – A sporadic commutative semifield of order
-
•
given by
-
•
Planar DO representatives over
-
•
It is not isotopic equivalent to a Dickson semifield or to a Cohen-Ganley semifield, see [PW-2000-oops].
-
•
.
In their study of ovoids in the orthogonal space , Penttila and Williams [PW-2000-oops] discovered this commutative semifield as part of a computational search. At the time of writing, this example is not part of any known infinite family.
-
•
-
2008
ACW – A sporadic planar DO binomial over
-
•
Planar DO representative over :
-
•
At and Cohen [AC-2008-antfa] found a new planar binomial over in the course of testing a proposed method for establishing planarity. In July, 2009, in Dublin, at Fq9, the 9th International Conference on Finite Fields and Applications, Coulter and Kosick [CK-2010-csooa] attributed the very same planar example to Guibiao Weng, who had informed them of the example in personal correspondence dating from March 2008 at the latest. It appears both At and Cohen, and Weng discovered this binomial independently at around the same time.
-
•
-
2008
BH – The planar DO polynomials of Budaghyan and Helleseth
-
•
Planar DO representative over :
Here, , is a non-square and with where, for any positive integer , is the non-negative integer such that is odd.
-
•
For fixed , any choice of and produces functions in the same strong isotopy class, see Bierbrauer [B-2011-csfpm] or Feng and Li [FL-2018-otico].
-
•
For any odd, each member splits into two isotopic classes (see Remark 2 below).
-
•
[MP-2012-otnoa].
Budaghyan and Helleseth [BH-2008-npnmo] established a family of planar DO polynomials with many terms. These produced the first new infinite family of commutative semifields without a restriction on the characteristic to be discovered in over 50 years. For convenience, here we present the form defined by Bierbrauer in [B-2011-csfpm, B-2010-nspaa] (see [ZP-2013-anfos, Theorem 7]) because it is shorter. Many families of planar DO polynomials discovered since have been shown to be equivalent to this family such as the Lunardon-Marino-Polverino-Trombetti-Bierbrauer (LMPTB) family [B-2011-csfpm], the Zha-Wang (ZW) family [ZW-2009-nfopn], and a family by Bierbrauer[BBFMP-2018-afosi]. Even some parts of the ZP family, see below, turns out to be equivalent to this family. Over , all the instances of the BH family do not split. In this paper, we show that all the instances of the BH family over that have nuclei split and the ones that have nuclei do not split.
-
•
-
2009
ZKW – The planar DO binomials of Zha, Kyureghyan and Wang
-
•
Planar DO representative over :
Here , , positive integer such that , is odd and is primitive.
-
•
[MP-2012-otnoa].
A family of planar DO binomials was given in 2009 by Zha, Kyureghyan and Wang [ZKW-2009-pnlba]. This family was obtained as a generalization of a family of APN binomials presented by Budaghyan, Carlet, and Leander [BCL-2008-tcoqa]. They also showed that the family contains planar functions that are not monomials.
-
•
-
2010
B – The planar DO binomials of Bierbrauer
-
•
Planar DO representative over :
Here , such that is odd, , and is primitive.
-
•
[MP-2012-otnoa].
This family of planar DO binomials was established by Bierbrauer [B-2010-nspaa]. These binomials have a remarkably similar structure to those discovered in [ZKW-2009-pnlba], but have distinct dimensions. They were also obtained as a generalization of the same family of APN binomials [BCL-2008-tcoqa].
-
•
-
2010
CK – Two sporadic planar DO polynomials over fields of order and
-
•
Planar DO representatives over with :
-
•
The first with , , and (or and ).
-
•
.
-
•
The second with , , and (or and ).
-
•
.
Using the form described in [CHK-2007-ppfcs], Coulter and Kosick [CK-2010-csooa] conducted an exhaustive search for families of planar DO polynomials that had representatives with coefficients in the prime subfield. This search was carried out for fields of order and , and two new examples were discovered, one for each order. Both remain outside of any known infinite family.
-
•
-
2013
ZP – The commutative semifields of Zhou and Pott
-
•
given by
Here with , odd, and is a nonsquare.
-
•
By fixing and as above, any choice of non-square leads to a semifield that fall into the same strong isotopic class [ZP-2013-anfos].
-
•
The D family coincides with ZP with parameters and . The BH family over the finite field such that is odd and is a square in coincides with ZP with parameters and [ZP-2013-anfos, Theorem 5].
-
•
Let and with then the two semifileds defined by and are not isotopic. Moreover if and , then the isotopic class of each semifiled defined by contains exactly two strong isotopic classes [ZP-2013-anfos, Theorem 6].
-
•
By cleverly replacing the field multiplication with twisted field multiplication in the general form of commutative semifields studied by Cohen and Ganley [CG-1982-cstdo], itself a form based on Dickson’s original construction [D-1906-oclai], Zhou and Pott [ZP-2013-anfos] produced a new general family of commutative semifields. This construction method generated many new inequivalent families.
-
•
-
2023
GK – The commutative semifields of Göloğlu and Kölsch
-
•
Planar DO representative over :
Here is even and not a power of , is a nonsquare, is not a power of and is odd.
-
•
.
Göloğlu and Kölsch dramatically changed the number of known inequivalent commutative semifields in a landmark paper [GK-2023-aebot]. They produced a new construction method which allowed them to combine some of the previously known commutative semifields into new semifields. Through their construction method they were able to show that the number of non-isotopic commutative semifields of order grows exponentially with . This confirmed a conjecture of Kantor, who had proved a corresponding result for commutative semifields of even order in 2003 [K-2003-csass], but the result did not transfer to odd characteristic.
-
•
Remark 1.
In 2007, Coulter, Henderson and Kosick [CHK-2007-ppfcs] developed a general form for planar DO polynomials that can be used to describe all planar DO families. Using this form they published a purported example over with middle nucleus of order 9 and nucleus of order 3. Unfortunately, the paper has numerous typographical errors and the original example, often called the CHK semifield, was wrong (it is not even planar). A replacement example was given on Coulter’s personal website, but it was sourced from a file of Dickson isotopes by mistake. At the time [CHK-2007-ppfcs] was published, Coulter, Henderson and Kosick knew of 4 potentially inequivalent commutative semifields of order with , but had been unable to prove the inequivalence of these among themselves. We have now confirmed that the four potential classes are all now covered by the BH class (indeed, Classes 8.5 and 8.6 in Table A.1). For these reasons, even though the 4 examples known to the authors of [CHK-2007-ppfcs] do pre-date the BH class, we do not list the CHK example as part of the nomenclature.
Remark 2.
Let . In [ZP-2013-anfos], it is shown that ZP with and coincides with BH if is odd and is a square in and that each of those instances split. Since is odd, is a square in if and only if . Marino and Polverino [MP-2012-oiasi] prove that the BH family splits if is not a power of , is odd and . Observe that if m is odd, then . If is even and is odd, then is even and . Combining the two results, we get that the BH family splits if is odd.
3.1 Some remarks on the classification of planar DO polynomials
We record some known facts on the classification of planar functions, planar DO polynomials and commutative semifields.
-
•
Planar functions over prime fields were classified in 1989 and 1990. All are quadratic, and all are equivalent to , which produces the finite field. This was established independently by three sets of authors: Gluck [G-1990-apapp], Hiramine [H-1989-acoap], and Rónyai and Szönyi [RS-1989-pfaff].
-
•
Planar monomials have been classified over fields of order with . Johnson [J-1987-ppoot] proved the prime field case in 1987. Order was completed by Coulter [C-2006-tcopm], and order by Coulter and Lazebnik [CL-2012-otcop]. The order case was completed in 2022 by Bergman, Coulter and Villa [BCV-2022-cpmof].
-
•
Knuth [K-1965-fsapp] showed that commutative semifields of order are necessarily isotopic to finite fields in 1965. In 1977, Menichetti [M-1977-oakcc] proved that any commutative semifield of dimension 3 over its nucleus is necessarily isotopic to an Albert twisted field. Together these two results complete the classification of commutative semifields of orders and .
-
•
Menichetti later proved in [M-1996-daoaf] that if is prime and is sufficiently large, any commutative semifield of order with nucleus of order is equivalent to an Albert’s twisted field.
-
•
Let be an odd prime power and a positive integer. Blokhuis, Lavrauw and Ball [BLB-2003-otcos] proved that if , then any commutative semifield of order with , is either equivalent to the finite field or a Dickson semifield. In particular, this shows that any commutative semifield of order with is necessarily a Dickson semifield or a finite field. Note that the only remaining case to consider for order is with . At the time of writing, we know of no examples.
-
•
Commutative semifields of orders have been classified for . The results of Knuth and Menichetti mentioned above deal with . For order 81, Dickson [35] showed in 1906 “by a tedious computation” that the only commutative semifields were those given by his construction. To put this in context, it wasn’t until 2008 that Dempwolff [D-2008-spoo] managed to enumerate all semifields of order 81. Weng and Zeng [WZ-2012-fropd] computed all commutative semifields of order 243 in 2012.
-
•
For , every commutative semifield over with nuclei is either in Dickson, in Cohen-Ganley, or in Pentilla-Williams (if ) [BLB-2003-otcos, MPT-2007-oflso, LR-2019-codrt].
-
•
For up to , all planar DO polynomials in with coefficients in the prime field were classified by Davidova and Kaleyski [DK-2022-coadp].
4 Quadrinomials representing the Dickson family
There are a number of planar DO representatives of the Dickson family known. Some of these are particularly simple. For example, [CHHKXZ-2007-ppacs, Theorem 4.2] gives binomial representatives for the specific Dickson semifields of dimension 2 over the middle nucleus and dimension 4 over the nucleus. Kosick [K-2009-csooo] gives also planar DO representatives for any Dickson semifield. Here we present both for completeness.
Lemma 1 ([CHHKXZ-2007-ppacs, Theorem 4.2]).
Let be any odd prime and let be an even positive integer such that . Let , let be a primitive element of and a positive integer. Then is a planar DO polynomial over representing the Dickson semifield as described in class D.
Lemma 2 (Kosick [K-2009-csooo, Theorem 3.1.2]).
Let be any odd prime, for some integer and let . Let and be functions over . Then is a planar DO polynomial over representing the Dickson semifield as described in class D.
We note that the proof given by Kosick in [K-2009-csooo] actually proves a slightly more general statement than the one we gave above.
The representatives given in Lemma 2 have 6 terms. We now show that there are always quadrinomial representatives of Dickson semifields.
Theorem 2.
Let be any odd prime, for some integer and let . If , then the polynomial
(2) |
is a planar DO polynomial over representing the Dickson semifield as described in class D above.
Proof.
For simplicity of exposition, set . We shall first prove that the linearised polynomial is a permutation polynomial over and then we show that , where is as given in Lemma 2, is the quadrinomial (2) of our statement. That it is planar follows at once from the fact is a linear permutation.
Let us show that is a permutation. To do so, we need only show the only root of in is . To that end, suppose satisfies . We have
We conclude . We therefore have
and rearranging and simplifying yields
Now, all roots of in lie in the field , which is equal to the field by hypothesis since . In particular, all roots of lie in , and so . This implies from which we conclude . Thus,
proving is our only solution. We have proved is a permutation.
The condition , while a restriction, does not stop us from obtaining all of the non-isotopic versions in Dickson’s class. This is because and produce the same Dickson isotopes. Let and with odd integers. Note that with and for some odd integer . If , then and so . Consequently, we can cover all of the non-isotopic semifields in the Dickson class by choosing or as appropriate.
5 Computational results
5.1 The expansion search for new planar functions
We describe the procedure we used to search for new instances of planar DO polynomials over , , , and . It consists of taking a quadratic power function in univariate representation, adding quadratic terms of the form progressively, and testing for planarity each time. This method is based on a similar method as the one introduced by Aleksandersen, Budaghyan, and Kaleyski [ABK-2022-sfafb] for the search of APN functions over binary fields. Then, we test if these functions are new up to CCZ-equivalence using the linear equivalence algorithm [IK-2022-darle, Algorithm 1]. We performed this computational investigation for over , over , over , and over .
We carried out our searches on a server with a Dell Inc. Poweredge C4130 motherboard, Intel Xeon CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz, NVIDIA Tesla K80, and 512 GB DDR4 RAM @2300MHz. We give a complete report of the searches conducted and the necessary time in Table A.4.
Let be the primitive element of over chosen by MAGMA [BCP-1997-tmasi]. In dimension 6, we find seven new CCZ-classes of planar functions. All of these can be obtained by expanding and by two or three terms with coefficients in . Two of the classes can be represented by trinomials, namely
and
Note also that is primitive in , and so all the coefficients of these representations lie in the subfield . The remaining five classes do not appear to have a trinomial representation but can be expressed using quadrinomials with coefficients in . These are:
In dimension , we find two new CCZ-classes of planar functions with coefficients in . Both of these can be obtained by expanding by four elements. They are:
Throughout all of our computational investigations in , , and we were not able to find any previously unknown new planar functions (up to CCZ-equivalence). However, we found some nice representations with coefficients in of some known planar functions. We recall that this is an important result because it allows us to compute the orbits more efficiently, for instance using [IK-2022-darle, Algorithm 5].
5.2 On the known planar functions in characteristic 3
We now present a full account of the known planar functions over for , up to CCZ-equivalence. To start, we focus on the procedures used to complete this categorisation and the accompanying data related to invariants. Our results can be found in Appendix A. We use as reference the known families of functions listed in Section 3, the newly discovered sporadic functions over and described in Subsection 5.1, and the family of quadrinomials described in Section 4. By doing this, we update the previous classification done in 2010 [PZ-2010-scopf]. We list the representatives of the known CCZ-classes in these dimensions and their CCZ-invariants. Those are the order of the monomial automorphism group, the sizes of the nuclei of the associated semifield in the case of quadratic functions, and the multiset of the cardinalities of each orbit as described in Subsection 2.3. Moreover, we report a list of representatives of the right orbits of each CCZ-class representative we chose. Although this is not an invariant, knowledge of the orbit representatives can be used to speed up the equivalence test defined in [IK-2022-darle] significantly, making it easier to run future tests for equivalence with the proposed representatives. We recall that the orbit representatives are not a linear invariant, but if two functions and are linearly equivalent such that , then .
Whenever we have some quadratic planar functions that are either sporadic or come from a family, we must verify if each leads to or strong isotopic classes by using the Coulter-Henderson Theorem 1. We recall the order of the nuclei are invariants up to isotopism, while the order of the automorphism group and the multiset of the cardinalities of each orbit are only invariants up to strong isotopism.
The classification of known planar functions over with odd does not require an equivalence test because the known functions are either power functions for which we can use cyclotomic equivalence instead of CCZ-or belong to the two TST instances which are known to be CCZ-inequivalent to any power function. However, computing the invariants in dimension and was important for the expansion search. The cases and are still feasible because we can use all the theoretical results available to reduce the number of tests. The case is left for future work both because of limitations of computational power and because the number of representatives is too high.
In order to compute the nuclei efficiently, we use the following procedure. Let be a commutative semifield, then the function that maps to has a unique polynomial representation where all the nonzero monomial in the representation are of the form where . Then is equal to the set of all such that since . Moreover, the set is equal to the set of such that . This procedure is efficient if constructing is not computationally expensive and this can be the case if is constructed starting from a planar function with a sufficiently sparse polynomial representation.
The automorphism group of the associated linear code from [PZ-2010-scopf] is computed in a straightforward way using the Magma algebra system. Unfortunately, this is only possible for with ; for higher dimensions, the memory needed to perform the computation becomes prohibitive. We also note that computing the automorphism group of a DO planar function over equivalent to a power function can be more computationally expensive than checking for equivalence with [IK-2022-darle]. So we took this into account throughout our computations by checking first if a function is equivalent to a power function and only if it is not, we compute the order of its automorphism group.
Linear equivalence tests were performed using [IK-2022-darle, Algorithm 1]. Once a classification was compiled, it was possible to compute the linear invariant using the right orbits, as well as the orbit representatives, using [IK-2022-darle, Algorithm 5]. We made an effort in searching for the class representatives that have polynomial representation with coefficients in the smallest possible subfield, since this significantly speeds up the computation of the orbits.
Acknowledgments
The results of this paper are partially in the master thesis of Alise Haukenes [H-2022-cacsf], with supervisors Lilya Budaghyan and Nikolay Kaleyski. The research of Lilya Budaghyan and Enrico Piccione is supported by the Norwegian Research Council. R.S. Coulter’s research was partially supported by a bequest from the Estate of Francisco Javier “Pancho” Sayas.
Appendix A Appendix
A.1 Functions
—c—c—X—c—c—
CCZ-inequivalent planar functions over ,
n Representative Family Splits
\endhead\endfoot
2 2.1 FF No
3 3.1 FF No
3.2 A No
4 4.1 FF No
4.2 CM NA
4.3 \CenterstackBH/D/ZP No
5 5.1 FF No
5.2 A No
5.3 A No
5.4 CM NA
5.5 TST No
5.6 TST No
5.7 ACW No
5.8 CK No
6 6.1 FF No
6.2 A No
6.3 CM NA
6.4 CM NA
6.5 D/ZP No
6.6 BH/ZP 6.7
6.7 BH/ZP 6.6
6.8 G No
6.9 CG No
6.10 ZP No
6.11 This work No
6.12 This work No
6.13 This work 6.14
6.14 This work 6.13
6.15 This work 6.16
6.16 This work 6.15
6.17 This work No
7 7.1 FF No
7.2 A No
7.3 A No
7.4 A No
7.5 CM NA
7.6 CM NA
7.7 TST No
7.8 TST No
8 8.1 FF No
8.2 CM NA
8.3 CM NA
8.4 CM NA
8.5 BH 8.6
8.6 BH 8.5
8.7 \CenterstackB/BH/D/ZP No
8.8 \CenterstackD/ZP No
8.9 CG 8.10
8.10 CG 8.9
9
9.1 FF No
9.2 A No
9.3 A No
9.4 A No
9.5 A No
9.6 CM NA
9.7 CM NA
9.8 TST No
9.9 TST No
9.10 This work No
9.11 This work No
10
10.1 FF No
10.2 A No
10.3 A No
10.4 CM NA
10.5 CM NA
10.6 CM NA
10.7 CG No
10.8 D/ZP No
10.9 D/ZP No
10.10 PW No
10.11 G No
10.12 ZP No
10.13 ZP No
10.14 ZP No
10.15 ZP No
10.16 BH 10.17
10.17 BH 10.16
10.18 BH 10.19
10.19 BH 10.18
10.20 ZP 10.21
10.21 ZP 10.20
10.22 ZP 10.23
10.23 ZP 10.22
11
11.1 FF No
11.2 A No
11.3 A No
11.4 A No
11.5 A No
11.6 A No
11.7 CM NA
11.8 CM NA
11.9 CM NA
11.10 CM NA
11.11 TST No
11.12 TST No
A.2 Invariants
—c—c—c—c—c—X—
Invariants for the classes in Table A.1
n Orbits Aut. group order
\endhead\endfoot3
3.1
3.2
4
4.1
4.2 NA NA
4.3
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4 NA NA
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
6
6.1
6.2
6.3 NA NA
6.4 NA NA
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13
6.14
6.15
6.16
6.17
7
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5 NA NA
7.6 NA NA
7.7
7.8
8
8.1
8.2 NA NA
8.3 NA NA
8.4 NA NA
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
8.9
8.10
9
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6 NA NA
9.7 NA NA
9.8
9.9
9.10
9.11
10
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4 NA NA
10.5 NA NA
10.6 NA NA
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
11
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
11.6
11.7 NA NA
11.8 NA NA
11.9 NA NA
11.10 NA NA
11.11
11.12
A.3 Orbits
—c—c—¿X—
Right orbit representatives for the classes in Table A.1.
n Orbit representatives ()
\endhead\endfoot4 4.3
5 5.5 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 25, 26, 31, 34, 35, 38, 40, 61, 67, 76
5.6 same as 5.5
5.7
5.8 same as 5.5
6
6.5 0, 1, 4, 7, 8, 11, 14
6.6 0, 1, 2
6.7 0, 1, 2, 7
6.8 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15, 17, 20
6.9 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 22, 23, 31, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 44, 45, 47, 48, 50, 54, 66, 72, 90
6.10 0, 1, 2, 6, 8, 13, 15
6.11 Table A.3
6.12 Table A.3
6.13 Table A.3
6.14 Table A.3
6.15 Table A.3
6.16 Table A.3
6.17 Table A.3
7
7.7 Table A.3
7.8 Table A.3
8
8.5 0, 1, 2, 4, 7, 8
8.6 0, 1, 2, 4, 7, 8
8.7 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7
8.8 0, 1, 2, 4, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 28, 35, 41
8.9 Table A.3
8.10 Table A.3
10
10.8 0, 1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 14, 16, 19, 20, 22, 26, 31, 34, 38, 40, 41, 49, 55, 65, 76, 82, 91, 104, 122, 133
10.9 0, 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20, 23, 25, 26, 32, 34, 38, 40, 41, 44, 55, 61, 86, 122, 125, 188
10.12 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 31, 32, 34, 38, 40, 41, 43, 47, 61, 122
10.13 Same as 10.9
10.14 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 16, 20, 21, 23, 28, 29, 31, 34, 38, 42, 43, 48, 53, 64, 79, 183, 192
10.15 Same as 10.12
10.16 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17
10.17 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 20, 61
10.18 same as 10.16
10.19 same as 10.17
10.20 same as 10.17
10.21 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13, 42, 44, 51
10.22 same as 10.17
10.23 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19
—c—X—
Right orbits representatives of the classes missing from Table A.3
Orbit representatives ()
\endhead\endfoot\Centerstack6.11
to
6.17 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 23, 24, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 46, 47, 48, 49, 51, 53, 55, 56, 57, 58, 60, 69, 71, 73, 74, 76, 78, 80, 91, 92, 94, 96, 98, 101, 114, 119, 121, 137, 139
\Centerstack7.7
7.8 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37, 38, 40, 43, 44, 46, 47, 49, 50, 52, 53, 55, 56, 58, 59, 61, 62, 64, 65, 67, 70, 71, 73, 74, 76, 77, 79, 80, 85, 86, 88, 89, 91, 92, 94, 97, 98, 100, 101, 103, 104, 106, 107, 110, 112, 113, 115, 116, 118, 119, 121, 137, 139, 142, 143, 145, 146, 148, 151, 152, 154, 155, 157, 160, 161, 169, 170, 172, 173, 175, 178, 179, 181, 182, 184, 187, 188, 193, 196, 197, 199, 200, 202, 211, 214, 215, 220, 223, 224, 226, 227, 229, 233, 235, 236, 238, 241, 242, 274, 277, 278, 281, 283, 295, 296, 301, 304, 305, 308, 310, 317, 319, 322, 323, 337, 344, 346, 349, 350, 358, 359, 362, 364, 547, 553, 562, 565, 589, 592, 607, 688, 715
8.9 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 72, 73, 75, 76, 78, 79, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 139, 142, 143, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153, 154, 155, 157, 158, 159, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 177, 178, 179, 181, 182, 183, 185, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 195, 196, 197, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 219, 220, 222, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 241, 242, 243, 244, 246, 247, 248, 249, 253, 254, 256, 257, 258, 260, 261, 263, 264, 266, 267, 269, 270, 271, 274, 275, 278, 281, 282, 284, 287, 289, 291, 292, 293, 294, 299, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 311, 312, 314, 315, 317, 320, 321, 323, 324, 326, 329, 333, 334, 336, 340, 342, 346, 347, 349, 351, 359, 360, 361, 363, 365, 369, 372, 373, 374, 377, 378, 380, 381, 382, 383, 386, 390, 394, 396, 397, 400, 401, 402, 405, 406, 412, 414, 415, 419, 420, 427, 429, 431, 434, 435, 439, 442, 445, 447, 449, 455, 456, 457, 461, 462, 469, 470, 472, 473, 475, 477, 493, 495, 496, 497, 498, 500, 504, 506, 507, 513, 515, 519, 520, 521, 523, 525, 529, 533, 539, 540, 544, 547, 552, 557, 558, 560, 564, 565, 567, 568, 576, 583, 584, 591, 593, 598, 601, 611, 613, 620, 621, 623, 637, 641, 643, 646, 649, 652, 653, 656, 658, 659, 667, 668, 670, 679, 681, 685, 694, 697, 699, 703, 704, 716, 721, 724, 736, 775, 784, 787, 791, 796, 807, 810, 816, 822, 830, 837, 845, 855, 865, 867, 880, 933, 935, 939, 954, 975, 986, 994, 1080, 1107, 1134, 1194
8.10 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 92, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 120, 121, 122, 124, 125, 126, 128, 129, 132, 133, 134, 136, 138, 139, 140, 141, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 159, 161, 162, 163, 164, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 188, 189, 190, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 204, 206, 207, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 220, 221, 222, 223, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 232, 233, 235, 236, 237, 238, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 246, 249, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256, 258, 259, 260, 267, 269, 272, 275, 276, 277, 278, 281, 282, 284, 286, 288, 289, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 298, 300, 302, 305, 307, 311, 313, 314, 316, 318, 323, 326, 327, 328, 330, 331, 337, 338, 340, 342, 343, 346, 347, 348, 351, 353, 360, 361, 366, 368, 371, 372, 374, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 382, 384, 386, 395, 397, 401, 402, 404, 405, 407, 414, 415, 416, 419, 420, 422, 426, 430, 431, 436, 440, 441, 444, 446, 456, 458, 468, 469, 475, 478, 480, 491, 494, 508, 510, 511, 512, 517, 522, 524, 530, 532, 535, 536, 542, 546, 548, 550, 561, 565, 566, 567, 569, 571, 572, 573, 578, 579, 581, 582, 583, 586, 589, 590, 595, 596, 599, 600, 606, 607, 608, 610, 633, 639, 642, 643, 646, 647, 661, 669, 682, 686, 687, 688, 696, 699, 706, 710, 712, 717, 728, 736, 737, 740, 741, 747, 750, 752, 753, 756, 757, 763, 770, 787, 811, 812, 825, 830, 841, 846, 850, 851, 856, 866, 890, 901, 904, 920, 921, 927, 934, 942, 975, 976, 981, 989, 996, 1005, 1020, 1043, 1049, 1052, 1106, 1109, 1116, 1160, 1260, 1337, 1385
\Centerstack9.8
9.9
A.4 Expansion Searches
—c—c—c—c—c—c—c—c—c—c—c—c—
Expansion Searches for monomials , with coefficients over .
n Expansion Terms
1 2 3 4 5
m time m time m time m time m time
\endhead
6 6 0.1s 6 41m 6 535.5h 3 33.7h 2 411.1h
6 1.8s 6 63.1h 3 33.1h 2 29.32h 1 2h
7 7 10ms
7 8m - - - - - -
7 5.6s 7 34.4h - - - - - -
7 2.8m 7 455.7h - - - - - -
7 4.2m 7 589.9 h - - - - - -
8 8 19s 4 21.3m 4 48.4h 2 15.24h 1 3.2h
8 90ms 8 29.6h 4 60.7h 2 45.7h 1 10.4h
8 0.1s 8 5.4h 4 52.9h 2 48.5h 1 4.5h
8 0.1s 8 352.4h 4 323.5h 2 55.6h 1 4.7h
8 36s 8 42.4h 2 148.4h 1 131.7h 1 304.8h
9 1 120ms 1 13.6h 1 42.9h 1 185.2h - -
1 38s 1 24.3m 1 277.5h 1 85.5h - -
1 92s 1 1.1h 1 300h 1 205.1h - -
1 8s 1 9.1m 1 87.91h 1 168.6h - -
1 10m 1 1.7h 1 300h 1 93.9h - -
1 11m 1 1.9h 1 294.3h 1 89.9h - -