Generalized central sets theorem for partial semigroups and VIP systems

Anik Pramanick, Md Mursalim Saikh [email protected] Department of Mathematics, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Nadia-741235, West Bengal, India. [email protected] Department of Mathematics, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Nadia-741235, West Bengal, India.
Abstract.

D. Phulara genaralize the central sets theorem for commutative semigroup. We establish Phulara type generalization of Central sets theorem for arbitrary adequate partial semigroup. We also generalize the analogue of Furstenberg’s Central sets theorem for VIP systems in Phulara’s way.

1. Introduction

In Ramsey theory Central sets Theorem has its own importance. After the foundation of both van der Waerden’s and Hindman’s theorem, an immediate question appears if one can find a joint extension of both of these theorems. In [F], using the methods of Topological dynamics, Furstenberg defined the notions of Central Sets and proved that if N is finitely colored, then one of the color classes is Central.

Here we mention some notational definitions that we use through out this article.

Definition 1.1.

(a)𝑎\left(a\right)( italic_a ) Given a set A,𝒫f(A)={F:ϕFA and F is finite}𝐴subscript𝒫𝑓𝐴conditional-set𝐹italic-ϕ𝐹𝐴 and F is finiteA,\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(A\right)=\left\{F:\phi\neq F\subseteq A\text{ \text{and% $F$ is finite}}\right\}italic_A , caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_A ) = { italic_F : italic_ϕ ≠ italic_F ⊆ italic_A and F is finite }

(b)𝑏\left(b\right)( italic_b ) 𝒥m={tm:t(1)<t(2)<<t(m)}.subscript𝒥𝑚conditional-set𝑡superscript𝑚𝑡1𝑡2𝑡𝑚\mathcal{J}_{m}=\left\{t\in\mathbb{N}^{m}:t\left(1\right)<t\left(2\right)<...<% t\left(m\right)\right\}.caligraphic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = { italic_t ∈ blackboard_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_t ( 1 ) < italic_t ( 2 ) < … < italic_t ( italic_m ) } .

(c)𝑐\left(c\right)( italic_c ) d={A:Ad}subscript𝑑conditional-set𝐴delimited-∣∣𝐴𝑑\mathcal{F}_{d}=\left\{A\subset\mathbb{N}:\mid A\mid\leq d\right\}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = { italic_A ⊂ blackboard_N : ∣ italic_A ∣ ≤ italic_d }

(d)𝑑\left(d\right)( italic_d ) Let (Hn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐻𝑛𝑛1\left(H_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTbe a sequence by, FU((Hn)n=1)={nFHn:F𝒫f()}𝐹𝑈superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐻𝑛𝑛1conditional-setsubscript𝑛𝐹subscript𝐻𝑛𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓FU\left(\left(H_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}\right)=\left\{\sum_{n\in F}H_{n}:F% \in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)\right\}italic_F italic_U ( ( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) = { ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) }

(e)𝑒\left(e\right)( italic_e ) [n]delimited-[]𝑛\left[n\right][ italic_n ] ={1,2,,n}12𝑛\left\{1,2,...,n\right\}{ 1 , 2 , … , italic_n }, n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N

(f)𝑓\left(f\right)( italic_f ) let (Hn)n=1,Hn𝒫f(),By Hn<Hn+1 we mean maxHn<minHn+1formulae-sequencesuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐻𝑛𝑛1subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝒫𝑓𝐵𝑦 subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝐻𝑛1 we mean subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝐻𝑛1\left(H_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty},H_{n}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}% \right),By\text{ }H_{n}<H_{n+1}\text{ we mean }\max H_{n}<\min H_{n+1}( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) , italic_B italic_y italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT we mean roman_max italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < roman_min italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

(g)𝑔\left(g\right)( italic_g )An IP ring (1)superscript1\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a set of the form (1)=FU((αn)n=1)superscript1𝐹𝑈superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)}=FU\left(\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}\right)caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_F italic_U ( ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) where (αn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a sequence of members of 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that maxαn<minαn+1subscript𝛼𝑛subscript𝛼𝑛1\max\alpha_{n}<\min\alpha_{n+1}roman_max italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < roman_min italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n.

Theorem 1.2.

Let l𝑙l\in\mathbb{N}italic_l ∈ blackboard_N and for each i[l],𝑖delimited-[]𝑙i\in\left[l\right],italic_i ∈ [ italic_l ] , let (yi,n)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑦𝑖𝑛𝑛1\left(y_{i,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTbe a sequence in \mathbb{Z}blackboard_Z. Let C𝐶Citalic_C be a central𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙centralitalic_c italic_e italic_n italic_t italic_r italic_a italic_l subset of .\mathbb{N}.blackboard_N . Then there exists sequences (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin \mathbb{N}blackboard_N and (Hn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐻𝑛𝑛1\left(H_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that

(1)1\left(1\right)( 1 ) for all n,maxH<minHn+1𝑛𝐻subscript𝐻𝑛1n,\max H<\min H_{n+1}italic_n , roman_max italic_H < roman_min italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and

(2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ) for all F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) and all i[l],nF(an+tHnyi,t)Cformulae-sequence𝑖delimited-[]𝑙subscript𝑛𝐹subscript𝑎𝑛subscript𝑡subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑦𝑖𝑡𝐶i\in\left[l\right],\sum_{n\in F}\left(a_{n}+\sum_{t\in H_{n}}y_{i,t}\right)\in Citalic_i ∈ [ italic_l ] , ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C

Theorem 1.2 is the central sets theorem proved by Furstenberg in 1981. Later in 1990 V. Bergelson and N. Hindman proved a different but an equivalent version of the central set theorem.

Theorem 1.3.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative semigroup. Let l𝑙l\in\mathbb{N}italic_l ∈ blackboard_N and for each i{1,2,,l}𝑖12𝑙i\in\left\{1,2,...,l\right\}italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_l }, let (yi,n)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑦𝑖𝑛𝑛1\left(y_{i,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTbe a sequence in S𝑆Sitalic_S. Let C𝐶Citalic_C be a central subset of S𝑆Sitalic_S. Then there exist sequences (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin S𝑆Sitalic_S and (Hn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐻𝑛𝑛1\left(H_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that

(1)1\left(1\right)( 1 ) for all n,maxHn<minHn+1𝑛subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝐻𝑛1n,\text{$\max H_{n}$}<\min H_{n+1}italic_n , roman_max italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < roman_min italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and

(2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ) for all F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) and all f:F{1,2,,l},:𝑓𝐹12𝑙f:F\to\left\{1,2,...,l\right\},italic_f : italic_F → { 1 , 2 , … , italic_l } ,

nF(an+tHnyf(i),t)C.subscript𝑛𝐹subscript𝑎𝑛subscript𝑡subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑦𝑓𝑖𝑡𝐶\sum_{n\in F}\left(a_{n}+\sum_{t\in H_{n}}y_{f\left(i\right),t}\right)\in C.∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f ( italic_i ) , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C .

In 2008 D. De, N. Hindman and D. Strauss proved a stronger version of central sets theorem.

Theorem 1.4.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative semigroup and let C𝐶Citalic_C be a central subset of S𝑆Sitalic_S. Then there exist functions α:𝒫f(S)S and H:𝒫f(S)𝒫f():𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑆𝑆 and 𝐻:subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑆subscript𝒫𝑓\alpha:\mathcal{P}_{f}\left({}^{\mathbb{N}}S\right)\to S\text{ and }H:\mathcal% {P}_{f}\left(S^{\mathbb{N}}\right)\to\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_α : caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ) → italic_S and italic_H : caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) → caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that

(1)1\left(1\right)( 1 ) If F,G𝒫f(S)𝐹𝐺subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑆F,G\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S^{\mathbb{N}}\right)italic_F , italic_G ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and FG𝐹𝐺F\subsetneq Gitalic_F ⊊ italic_G then maxH(F)<minH(G)𝐻𝐹𝐻𝐺\max H\left(F\right)<\min H\left(G\right)roman_max italic_H ( italic_F ) < roman_min italic_H ( italic_G ) and

(2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ) If m,G1,G2,.,Gm𝒫f(S)m\in\mathbb{N},G_{1},G_{2},....,G_{m}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S^{\mathbb{N}}\right)italic_m ∈ blackboard_N , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … . , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT );G1G2.GmG_{1}\subsetneq G_{2}\subsetneq....\subsetneq G_{m}italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ … . ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT; and for each i{1,2,.,m},(yi,n)Gi,i\in\left\{1,2,....,m\right\},\left(y_{i,n}\right)\in G_{i},italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … . , italic_m } , ( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , then

i=1m(α(Gi)+tH(Gi)yi,t)C.superscriptsubscript𝑖1𝑚𝛼subscript𝐺𝑖subscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝐺𝑖subscript𝑦𝑖𝑡𝐶\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left(\alpha\left(G_{i}\right)+\sum_{t\in H\left(G_{i}\right)}y_% {i,t}\right)\in C.∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C .

In 2015 D. Phulara generalize the stronger version for commutative semigroup. The theorem is the following

Theorem 1.5.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative semigroup, let r𝑟ritalic_r be an idempotent in J(S),𝐽𝑆J\left(S\right),italic_J ( italic_S ) ,and let (Cn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑛1\left(C_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be a sequence of members of r.𝑟r.italic_r . There exists α:𝒫f(S)S and H:𝒫f(S)𝒫f():𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑆𝑆 and 𝐻:subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑆subscript𝒫𝑓\alpha:\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{{}^{\mathbb{N}}}S\right)\to S\text{ and }H% :\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{{}^{\mathbb{N}}}S\right)\to\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(% \mathbb{N}\right)italic_α : caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ) → italic_S and italic_H : caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ) → caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that

(1)1\left(1\right)( 1 ) If F,G𝒫f(S)𝐹𝐺subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑆F,G\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{{}^{\mathbb{N}}}S\right)italic_F , italic_G ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_S ) and FG𝐹𝐺F\subsetneq Gitalic_F ⊊ italic_G then maxH(F)<minH(G)𝐻𝐹𝐻𝐺\max H\left(F\right)<\min H\left(G\right)roman_max italic_H ( italic_F ) < roman_min italic_H ( italic_G )and

(2)2\left(2\right)( 2 )Whenever t,G1,G2,.,Gt𝒫f(S)t\in\mathbb{N},G_{1},G_{2},....,G_{t}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left({}^{\mathbb{N}}S\right)italic_t ∈ blackboard_N , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … . , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT blackboard_N end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_S );G1G2.GtG_{1}\subsetneq G_{2}\subsetneq....\subsetneq G_{t}italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ … . ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT;G1=mdelimited-∣∣subscript𝐺1𝑚\mid G_{1}\mid=m∣ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∣ = italic_m and for each i{1,2,.,n},fiGi,i\in\left\{1,2,....,n\right\},f_{i}\in G_{i},italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … . , italic_n } , italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , then

i=1t(α(Gi)+sH(Gi)fi(s))Cm.superscriptsubscript𝑖1𝑡𝛼subscript𝐺𝑖subscript𝑠𝐻subscript𝐺𝑖subscript𝑓𝑖𝑠subscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{i=1}^{t}\left(\alpha\left(G_{i}\right)+\sum_{s\in H\left(G_{i}\right)}f_% {i}\left(s\right)\right)\in C_{m}.∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_s ) ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

Proof.

[P]

Later in 2021 N. Hindman and K. Pleasant proved the central sets theorem for adequate partial semigroup. Here we generalize the theorem by K. Pleasant and N. Hindman in D. Phulara’s way. Apart from that we generalize the central sets theorem for VIP system in commutative adequate partial semigroup. Now we briefly discuss VIP system here.

Definition 1.6.

Let (G,+)𝐺\left(G,+\right)( italic_G , + ) be an abelian group. A sequence (vα)α𝒫f()subscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓\left(v_{\alpha}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)}( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in G𝐺Gitalic_G is called a VIP system if there exists some non-negative integer d (the least such d𝑑ditalic_d is called the degree of the system) such that for every pairwise disjoint α0,α1,,αd𝒫f()subscript𝛼0subscript𝛼1subscript𝛼𝑑subscript𝒫𝑓\alpha_{0},\alpha_{1},...,\alpha_{d}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) we have t=1d+1(1)t[{α0,α1,,αd}]tv=0superscriptsubscript𝑡1𝑑1superscript1𝑡subscriptsuperscriptdelimited-[]subscript𝛼0subscript𝛼1subscript𝛼𝑑𝑡subscript𝑣0\sum_{t=1}^{d+1}\left(-1\right)^{t}\sum_{\mathcal{B\in}\left[\left\{\alpha_{0}% ,\alpha_{1},...,\alpha_{d}\right\}\right]^{t}}v_{\cup\mathcal{B}}=0∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_B ∈ [ { italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∪ caligraphic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.

In their paper [HM] generalize this notion for partial semigroup. They defined the VIP system for partial semigroup in the following way.

Definition 1.7.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative partial semigroup. Let (vα)α𝒫f()subscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓\left(v_{\alpha}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)}( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT be a sequence in S.𝑆S.italic_S . (vα)α𝒫f()subscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓\left(v_{\alpha}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)}( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is called a VIP system if there exists some d𝑑d\in\mathbb{N}italic_d ∈ blackboard_N and a function from dsubscript𝑑\mathcal{F}_{d}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to S{0},𝑆0S\cup\left\{0\right\},italic_S ∪ { 0 } ,written γmγ,γ\gamma\to m_{\gamma},\gamma\initalic_γ → italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_γ ∈dsubscript𝑑\mathcal{F}_{d}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , such that

vα=γα,γdmγ for all α𝒫f(). ( In particular, the sum is always defined)formulae-sequencesubscript𝑣𝛼subscriptformulae-sequence𝛾𝛼𝛾subscript𝑑subscript𝑚𝛾 for all 𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓 ( In particular, the sum is always defined)v_{\alpha}=\sum_{\gamma\subseteq\alpha,\gamma\in\mathcal{F}_{d}}m_{\gamma}% \text{ for all }\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right).\text{ ( In % particular, the sum is always defined)}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ⊆ italic_α , italic_γ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for all italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) . ( In particular, the sum is always defined)

The sequence (mγ)γdsubscriptsubscript𝑚𝛾𝛾subscript𝑑\left(m_{\gamma}\right)_{\gamma\in\mathcal{F}_{d}}( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is said to generate the VIP system (vα)α𝒫f().subscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓\left(v_{\alpha}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)}.( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

Later they proved the Central sets theorem for VIP systems of commutative adequate partial semigroup.

2. ALGEBRAIC BACKGROUND

Here we briefly discuss about the Stone-Čech compactification βS𝛽𝑆\beta Sitalic_β italic_S of a semigroup S𝑆Sitalic_S. βS𝛽𝑆\beta Sitalic_β italic_S is the collection of all ultrafilters on S𝑆Sitalic_S and we identify the principal ultrafilters with the points of S.𝑆S.italic_S . For AS𝐴𝑆A\subseteq Sitalic_A ⊆ italic_S, A¯={pβS:Ap}.¯𝐴conditional-set𝑝𝛽𝑆𝐴𝑝\overline{A}=\left\{p\in\beta S:A\in p\right\}.over¯ start_ARG italic_A end_ARG = { italic_p ∈ italic_β italic_S : italic_A ∈ italic_p } . The set {A¯:AS}conditional-set¯𝐴𝐴𝑆\left\{\overline{A}:A\subseteq S\right\}{ over¯ start_ARG italic_A end_ARG : italic_A ⊆ italic_S } forms a basis for the compact Hausdorff topology on βS𝛽𝑆\beta Sitalic_β italic_S. For more information about βS𝛽𝑆\beta Sitalic_β italic_S readers are requested to see [HS]. We will discuss about partial semigroup here.

Definition 2.1.

A partial semigroup is a pair (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) where * maps a subset of S×S𝑆𝑆S\times Sitalic_S × italic_S to S𝑆Sitalic_S and for all a,b,c,Sa,b,c,\in Sitalic_a , italic_b , italic_c , ∈ italic_S, (ab)c=a(bc)𝑎𝑏𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑐\left(a*b\right)*c=a*\left(b*c\right)( italic_a ∗ italic_b ) ∗ italic_c = italic_a ∗ ( italic_b ∗ italic_c ) in the sense that if either side is defined, then so is the other and they are equal.


Definition 2.2.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be a partial semigroup.

(a)𝑎\left(a\right)( italic_a ) For sS,φ(s)={tS:st is defined}formulae-sequence𝑠𝑆𝜑𝑠conditional-set𝑡𝑆𝑠𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑s\in S,\varphi\left(s\right)=\left\{t\in S:s*t\text{ }is\text{ }defined\right\}italic_s ∈ italic_S , italic_φ ( italic_s ) = { italic_t ∈ italic_S : italic_s ∗ italic_t italic_i italic_s italic_d italic_e italic_f italic_i italic_n italic_e italic_d }

(b)𝑏\left(b\right)( italic_b ) For H𝒫f(S),σ(H)=sHφ(s)formulae-sequence𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆𝜎𝐻subscript𝑠𝐻𝜑𝑠H\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right),\sigma\left(H\right)=\cap_{s\in H}\varphi% \left(s\right)italic_H ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) , italic_σ ( italic_H ) = ∩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_φ ( italic_s )

(c) σ(ϕ)=S𝑐 𝜎italic-ϕ𝑆\left(c\right)\text{ }\sigma\left(\phi\right)=S( italic_c ) italic_σ ( italic_ϕ ) = italic_S

(d)𝑑\left(d\right)( italic_d ) For sS𝑠𝑆s\in Sitalic_s ∈ italic_S and AS, s1A={tφ(s):stA}formulae-sequence𝐴𝑆 superscript𝑠1𝐴conditional-set𝑡𝜑𝑠𝑠𝑡𝐴A\subseteq S,\text{ }s^{-1}A=\left\{t\in\varphi\left(s\right):s*t\in A\right\}italic_A ⊆ italic_S , italic_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A = { italic_t ∈ italic_φ ( italic_s ) : italic_s ∗ italic_t ∈ italic_A }

(e)𝑒\left(e\right)( italic_e ) (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) is adequate if and only if σ(H)ϕ𝜎𝐻italic-ϕ\sigma\left(H\right)\neq\phiitalic_σ ( italic_H ) ≠ italic_ϕ for all H𝒫f(S)𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆H\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right)italic_H ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ).

Lemma 2.3.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be a partial semigroup , let AS𝐴𝑆A\subseteq Sitalic_A ⊆ italic_S and let a,b,cS.𝑎𝑏𝑐𝑆a,b,c\in S.italic_a , italic_b , italic_c ∈ italic_S .Then cb1(a1A)bφ(a)and c(ab)1A.iff𝑐superscript𝑏1superscript𝑎1𝐴𝑏𝜑𝑎𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐superscript𝑎𝑏1𝐴c\in b^{-1}\left(a^{-1}A\right)\iff b\in\varphi\left(a\right)and\text{ }c\in% \left(a*b\right)^{-1}A.italic_c ∈ italic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A ) ⇔ italic_b ∈ italic_φ ( italic_a ) italic_a italic_n italic_d italic_c ∈ ( italic_a ∗ italic_b ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A . In particular, if bφ(a)𝑏𝜑𝑎b\in\varphi\left(a\right)italic_b ∈ italic_φ ( italic_a ), then b1(a1A)=(ab)1Asuperscript𝑏1superscript𝑎1𝐴superscript𝑎𝑏1𝐴b^{-1}\left(a^{-1}A\right)=\left(a*b\right)^{-1}Aitalic_b start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A ) = ( italic_a ∗ italic_b ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A.

Proof.

[HM], Lemma 2.32.32.32.3

We are specifically interested in adequate partial semigroups as they lead to an interesting sub semigroup of βS𝛽𝑆\beta Sitalic_β italic_S. This subsemigroup is itself a compact right topological semigroup and is defined next.

Definition 2.4.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be a partial semigroup. Then

δS=xSφ(x)¯=H𝒫f(S)σ[H]¯𝛿𝑆subscript𝑥𝑆¯𝜑𝑥subscript𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆¯𝜎delimited-[]𝐻\delta S=\cap_{x\in S}\overline{\varphi\left(x\right)}=\cap_{H\in\mathcal{P}_{% f}\left(S\right)}\overline{\sigma\left[H\right]}italic_δ italic_S = ∩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x ∈ italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_φ ( italic_x ) end_ARG = ∩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_σ [ italic_H ] end_ARG

Notice that δSϕ𝛿𝑆italic-ϕ\delta S\neq\phiitalic_δ italic_S ≠ italic_ϕ when the partial semigroup S𝑆Sitalic_S is adequate and for S𝑆Sitalic_S being semigroups δS=βS𝛿𝑆𝛽𝑆\delta S=\beta Sitalic_δ italic_S = italic_β italic_S.

For (S,.)\left(S,.\right)( italic_S , . ) be a semigroup, AS,aS, and p,qβS,formulae-sequence𝐴𝑆formulae-sequence𝑎𝑆 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑝𝑞𝛽𝑆A\subseteq S,a\in S,\text{ }and\text{ }p,q\in\beta S,italic_A ⊆ italic_S , italic_a ∈ italic_S , italic_a italic_n italic_d italic_p , italic_q ∈ italic_β italic_S , then Aa.qa1AqA\in a.q\iff a^{-1}A\in qitalic_A ∈ italic_a . italic_q ⇔ italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A ∈ italic_q

and

Ap.q{aS:a1Aq}pA\in p.q\iff\left\{a\in S:a^{-1}A\in q\right\}\in pitalic_A ∈ italic_p . italic_q ⇔ { italic_a ∈ italic_S : italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A ∈ italic_q } ∈ italic_p

Now we extend this notion for partial operation *.


Definition 2.5.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup.

(a)𝑎\left(a\right)( italic_a ) For aS𝑎𝑆a\in Sitalic_a ∈ italic_S and qφ(a)¯,aq={AS:a1Aq}.formulae-sequence𝑞¯𝜑𝑎𝑎𝑞conditional-set𝐴𝑆superscript𝑎1𝐴𝑞q\in\overline{\varphi\left(a\right)},a*q=\left\{A\subseteq S:a^{-1}A\in q% \right\}.italic_q ∈ over¯ start_ARG italic_φ ( italic_a ) end_ARG , italic_a ∗ italic_q = { italic_A ⊆ italic_S : italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A ∈ italic_q } .

(b)𝑏\left(b\right)( italic_b ) For pβS𝑝𝛽𝑆p\in\beta Sitalic_p ∈ italic_β italic_S and qδS,pq={AS:{aS:a1Aq}p}formulae-sequence𝑞𝛿𝑆𝑝𝑞conditional-set𝐴𝑆conditional-set𝑎𝑆superscript𝑎1𝐴𝑞𝑝q\in\delta S,p*q=\left\{A\subseteq S:\left\{a\in S:a^{-1}A\in q\right\}\in p\right\}italic_q ∈ italic_δ italic_S , italic_p ∗ italic_q = { italic_A ⊆ italic_S : { italic_a ∈ italic_S : italic_a start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A ∈ italic_q } ∈ italic_p }.

Lemma 2.6.

2.6. Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup.

(i)𝑖\left(i\right)( italic_i ) If aS𝑎𝑆a\in Sitalic_a ∈ italic_S and qφ(a),¯then aqβS.q\in\overline{\varphi\left(a\right),}then\text{ }a*q\in\beta S.italic_q ∈ over¯ start_ARG italic_φ ( italic_a ) , end_ARG italic_t italic_h italic_e italic_n italic_a ∗ italic_q ∈ italic_β italic_S .

(ii)𝑖𝑖\left(ii\right)( italic_i italic_i ) If pβS𝑝𝛽𝑆p\in\beta Sitalic_p ∈ italic_β italic_S and qδS𝑞𝛿𝑆q\in\delta Sitalic_q ∈ italic_δ italic_S, then pqβS.𝑝𝑞𝛽𝑆p*q\in\beta S.italic_p ∗ italic_q ∈ italic_β italic_S .

(iii)𝑖𝑖𝑖\left(iii\right)( italic_i italic_i italic_i ) Let pβS,qδS,formulae-sequence𝑝𝛽𝑆𝑞𝛿𝑆p\in\beta S,q\in\delta S,italic_p ∈ italic_β italic_S , italic_q ∈ italic_δ italic_S ,and aS.𝑎𝑆a\in S.italic_a ∈ italic_S .Then φ(a)pq𝜑𝑎𝑝𝑞\varphi\left(a\right)\in p*qitalic_φ ( italic_a ) ∈ italic_p ∗ italic_q if and only if φ(a)p.𝜑𝑎𝑝\varphi\left(a\right)\in p.italic_φ ( italic_a ) ∈ italic_p .

(iv)𝑖𝑣\left(iv\right)( italic_i italic_v ) If p,qδS,𝑝𝑞𝛿𝑆p,q\in\delta S,italic_p , italic_q ∈ italic_δ italic_S ,then pqδS𝑝𝑞𝛿𝑆p*q\in\delta Sitalic_p ∗ italic_q ∈ italic_δ italic_S.

Proof.

[HM], Lemma 2.72.72.72.7

Lemma 2.7.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup and let qδS.𝑞𝛿𝑆q\in\delta S.italic_q ∈ italic_δ italic_S . Then the function ρq:βSβS:subscript𝜌𝑞𝛽𝑆𝛽𝑆\rho_{q}:\beta S\to\beta Sitalic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_β italic_S → italic_β italic_S defined by ρq(p)=pqsubscript𝜌𝑞𝑝𝑝𝑞\rho_{q}\left(p\right)=p*qitalic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_p ) = italic_p ∗ italic_q is continuous.

Proof.

[HM],Lemma 2.82.82.82.8

Lemma 2.8.

Let pβS𝑝𝛽𝑆p\in\beta Sitalic_p ∈ italic_β italic_S and let q,rδS.𝑞𝑟𝛿𝑆q,r\in\delta S.italic_q , italic_r ∈ italic_δ italic_S . Then p(qr)=(pq)r.𝑝𝑞𝑟𝑝𝑞𝑟p*\left(q*r\right)=\left(p*q\right)*r.italic_p ∗ ( italic_q ∗ italic_r ) = ( italic_p ∗ italic_q ) ∗ italic_r .

Proof.

[HM], Lemma 2.92.92.92.9

Theorem 2.9.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup. Then (δS,)𝛿𝑆\left(\delta S,*\right)( italic_δ italic_S , ∗ ) is a compact Hausdorff right topological semigroup.

Proof.

[HM], Theorem 2.102.102.102.10

Theorem 2.10.

Let p=ppδS𝑝𝑝𝑝𝛿𝑆p=p*p\in\delta Sitalic_p = italic_p ∗ italic_p ∈ italic_δ italic_S and let Ap.𝐴𝑝A\in p.italic_A ∈ italic_p . Then A={xA:x1Ap}superscript𝐴conditional-set𝑥𝐴superscript𝑥1𝐴𝑝A^{*}=\left\{x\in A:x^{-1}A\in p\right\}italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = { italic_x ∈ italic_A : italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A ∈ italic_p }

For an idempotent pδS𝑝𝛿𝑆p\in\delta Sitalic_p ∈ italic_δ italic_S and Ap,𝐴𝑝A\in p,italic_A ∈ italic_p ,then Apsuperscript𝐴𝑝A^{*}\in pitalic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_p.

Lemma 2.11.

Let p=ppδS,𝑝𝑝𝑝𝛿𝑆p=p*p\in\delta S,italic_p = italic_p ∗ italic_p ∈ italic_δ italic_S ,let Ap,𝐴𝑝A\in p,italic_A ∈ italic_p ,let xA.𝑥superscript𝐴x\in A^{*}.italic_x ∈ italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . Then x1(A)p.superscript𝑥1superscript𝐴𝑝x^{-1}\left(A^{*}\right)\in p.italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_p .

Definition 2.12.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ )be a partial semigroup and let AS.𝐴𝑆A\subseteq S.italic_A ⊆ italic_S .Then A𝐴Aitalic_A is syndetic if and only if there is some H𝒫f(S)𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆H\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right)italic_H ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) such that σ(H)tHt1A.𝜎𝐻subscript𝑡𝐻superscript𝑡1𝐴\sigma\left(H\right)\subseteq\cup_{t\in H}t^{-1}A.italic_σ ( italic_H ) ⊆ ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A .

Lemma 2.13.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup and let AS.𝐴𝑆A\subseteq S.italic_A ⊆ italic_S .Then A𝐴Aitalic_A is syndetic if and only if there exists H𝒫f(S)𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆H\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right)italic_H ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) such that δStHt1A¯.𝛿𝑆subscript𝑡𝐻¯superscript𝑡1𝐴\delta S\subseteq\cup_{t\in H}\overline{t^{-1}A}.italic_δ italic_S ⊆ ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A end_ARG .

Definition 2.14.

K(δS)={A:A is a minimal left ideal in δS}.𝐾𝛿𝑆conditional-set𝐴𝐴 is a minimal left ideal in 𝛿𝑆K\left(\delta S\right)=\left\{A:A\text{ is a minimal left ideal in }\delta S% \right\}.italic_K ( italic_δ italic_S ) = { italic_A : italic_A is a minimal left ideal in italic_δ italic_S } .

Theorem 2.15.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup and let pδS.𝑝𝛿𝑆p\in\delta S.italic_p ∈ italic_δ italic_S . The following statements are equivalent.

(a)𝑎\left(a\right)( italic_a ) pK(δS).𝑝𝐾𝛿𝑆p\in K\left(\delta S\right).italic_p ∈ italic_K ( italic_δ italic_S ) .

(b)𝑏\left(b\right)( italic_b ) For all Ap𝐴𝑝A\in pitalic_A ∈ italic_p, {xS:x1Ap}conditional-set𝑥𝑆superscript𝑥1𝐴𝑝\left\{x\in S:x^{-1}A\in p\right\}{ italic_x ∈ italic_S : italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A ∈ italic_p }is syndetic.

(c)𝑐\left(c\right)( italic_c ) For all qδS,pδSqp.formulae-sequence𝑞𝛿𝑆𝑝𝛿𝑆𝑞𝑝q\in\delta S,p\in\delta S*q*p.italic_q ∈ italic_δ italic_S , italic_p ∈ italic_δ italic_S ∗ italic_q ∗ italic_p .

Proof.

[HM], Theorem 2.152.152.152.15

Definition 2.16.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup and let AS.𝐴𝑆A\subseteq S.italic_A ⊆ italic_S .

(a)𝑎\left(a\right)( italic_a ) The set A𝐴Aitalic_A is piecewise𝑝𝑖𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑤𝑖𝑠𝑒piecewiseitalic_p italic_i italic_e italic_c italic_e italic_w italic_i italic_s italic_e syndetic in S𝑆Sitalic_S if and only if A¯K(δS)ϕ.¯𝐴𝐾𝛿𝑆italic-ϕ\overline{A}\cap K\left(\delta S\right)\neq\phi.over¯ start_ARG italic_A end_ARG ∩ italic_K ( italic_δ italic_S ) ≠ italic_ϕ .

(b)𝑏\left(b\right)( italic_b ) The set A𝐴Aitalic_A is central𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙centralitalic_c italic_e italic_n italic_t italic_r italic_a italic_l in S𝑆Sitalic_S if and only if there is some idempotent p𝑝pitalic_p in K(δS)𝐾𝛿𝑆K\left(\delta S\right)italic_K ( italic_δ italic_S ) such that Ap.𝐴𝑝A\in p.italic_A ∈ italic_p .

(c)𝑐\left(c\right)( italic_c ) A set AS𝐴𝑆A\subseteq Sitalic_A ⊆ italic_S is a J𝐽Jitalic_J-set if and only if for all F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) and all L𝒫f(S),𝐿subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆L\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right),italic_L ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) , there exists mN,aSm+1,formulae-sequence𝑚𝑁𝑎superscript𝑆𝑚1m\in N,a\in S^{m+1},italic_m ∈ italic_N , italic_a ∈ italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,and t𝒥m𝑡subscript𝒥𝑚t\in\mathcal{J}_{m}italic_t ∈ caligraphic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT such that for all fF𝑓𝐹f\in Fitalic_f ∈ italic_F,

(i=1ma(i)f(t(i)))superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖1𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑓𝑡𝑖\left(\prod_{i=1}^{m}a\left(i\right)*f\left(t\left(i\right)\right)\right)( ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a ( italic_i ) ∗ italic_f ( italic_t ( italic_i ) ) )*a(m+1)𝑚1\left(m+1\right)( italic_m + 1 )Aσ(L)absent𝐴𝜎𝐿\in A\cap\sigma\left(L\right)∈ italic_A ∩ italic_σ ( italic_L )

(d)𝑑\left(d\right)( italic_d ) J(S)={pδS:(AP)(A is a J-set)}.𝐽𝑆conditional-set𝑝𝛿𝑆for-all𝐴𝑃𝐴 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝐽-setJ\left(S\right)=\left\{p\in\delta S:\left(\forall A\in P\right)\left(A\text{ }% is\text{ }a\text{ }J\text{-set}\right)\right\}.italic_J ( italic_S ) = { italic_p ∈ italic_δ italic_S : ( ∀ italic_A ∈ italic_P ) ( italic_A italic_i italic_s italic_a italic_J -set ) } .

Lemma 2.17.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup and let AS𝐴𝑆A\subseteq Sitalic_A ⊆ italic_S be piecewise syndetic.𝑝𝑖𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑤𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐piecewise\text{ }syndetic.italic_p italic_i italic_e italic_c italic_e italic_w italic_i italic_s italic_e italic_s italic_y italic_n italic_d italic_e italic_t italic_i italic_c . There exists H𝒫f(S)𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆H\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right)italic_H ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) such that for every finite nonempty set Tσ(H),𝑇𝜎𝐻T\subseteq\sigma\left(H\right),italic_T ⊆ italic_σ ( italic_H ) ,there exists xσ(T)𝑥𝜎𝑇x\in\sigma\left(T\right)italic_x ∈ italic_σ ( italic_T ) such that TxtHt1A.𝑇𝑥subscript𝑡𝐻superscript𝑡1𝐴T*x\subseteq\cup_{t\in H}t^{-1}A.italic_T ∗ italic_x ⊆ ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A .

Definition 2.18.

.Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup and let f𝑓fitalic_f be a sequence in S.𝑆S.italic_S . Then f𝑓fitalic_f is adequate if and only if

(1)1\left(1\right)( 1 ) for each H𝒫f()𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓H\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_H ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ), tHf(t)subscriptproduct𝑡𝐻𝑓𝑡\prod_{t\in H}f\left(t\right)∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f ( italic_t ) is defined and

(2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ) for each F𝒫f(S)𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ), there exists m𝑚m\in\mathbb{N}italic_m ∈ blackboard_N such that

FP((f(t))t=m)σ(F).𝐹𝑃superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑡𝑡𝑚𝜎𝐹FP\left(\left(f\left(t\right)\right)_{t=m}^{\infty}\right)\subseteq\sigma\left% (F\right).italic_F italic_P ( ( italic_f ( italic_t ) ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ⊆ italic_σ ( italic_F ) .
Definition 2.19.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup. Then

={f:fis an adequate sequence in S}conditional-set𝑓𝑓is an adequate sequence in 𝑆\mathcal{F}=\left\{f:f\text{is an adequate sequence in }S\right\}caligraphic_F = { italic_f : italic_f is an adequate sequence in italic_S }

3. PHULARA VERSION OF CENTRAL SETS THEOREM FOR ADEQUATE PARTIAL SEMIGROUP

In [M], Jillian McLeod establishes a version of Theorem 1.2 valid for commutative adequate partial semigroups. In [Pl], Kendra Pleasant and in [G], Arpita Ghosh, independently but later, prove a version of Theorem 1.4 for commutative adequate partial semigroups. In [P] Plulara generalized Central sets theorem for commutative semigroup. In this paper, we show that Theorem 1.5 remains valid for arbitrary adequate partial semigroups. To prove that we need the following lemma.

Lemma 3.1.

.Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup and let A𝐴Aitalic_A be a J𝐽Jitalic_J-set in S𝑆Sitalic_S. Let r,𝑟r\in\mathbb{N},italic_r ∈ blackboard_N , let F𝒫f(),𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right),italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) ,and let L𝒫f(S).𝐿subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆L\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right).italic_L ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) . There exists m,aSm+1,and t𝒥mformulae-sequence𝑚formulae-sequence𝑎superscript𝑆𝑚1𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡subscript𝒥𝑚m\in\mathbb{N},a\in S^{m+1},and\text{ }t\in\mathcal{J}_{m}italic_m ∈ blackboard_N , italic_a ∈ italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_a italic_n italic_d italic_t ∈ caligraphic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT such that t(1)>r𝑡1𝑟t\left(1\right)>ritalic_t ( 1 ) > italic_r and for all fF,𝑓𝐹f\in F,italic_f ∈ italic_F ,

(i=1ma(i)f(t(i))a(m+1)Aσ(L)).superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖1𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑓𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑚1𝐴𝜎𝐿\left(\prod_{i=1}^{m}a\left(i\right)*f\left(t\left(i\right)\right)*a\left(m+1% \right)\in A\cap\sigma\left(L\right)\right).( ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a ( italic_i ) ∗ italic_f ( italic_t ( italic_i ) ) ∗ italic_a ( italic_m + 1 ) ∈ italic_A ∩ italic_σ ( italic_L ) ) .

Proof.

[HP], Lemma 3.53.53.53.5

Theorem 3.2.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be an adequate partial semigroup and let r𝑟ritalic_r be an idempotent in J(S)𝐽𝑆J\left(S\right)italic_J ( italic_S ) and let (Cn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑛1\left(C_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be a sequence of members of r𝑟ritalic_r. Then there exists functions m:𝒫f(),:𝑚subscript𝒫𝑓m:\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right)\rightarrow\mathbb{N},italic_m : caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) → blackboard_N ,and α×F𝒫f()Sm(F)+1\alpha\in\times_{F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right)}S^{m\left(F\right% )+1}italic_α ∈ × start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m ( italic_F ) + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and 𝒯×F𝒫f()𝒥m(F)\mathcal{T}\in\times_{F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right)}\mathcal{J}_% {m\left(F\right)}caligraphic_T ∈ × start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m ( italic_F ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT such that

1. If F,G𝒫f(),GFformulae-sequence𝐹𝐺subscript𝒫𝑓𝐺𝐹F,G\in\mathcal{P}_{f}(\mathcal{F}),G\subset Fitalic_F , italic_G ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) , italic_G ⊂ italic_F, then 𝒯(G)(m(G))<𝒯(F)(1).𝒯𝐺𝑚𝐺𝒯𝐹1\mathcal{T}(G)(m(G))<\mathcal{T}(F)(1).caligraphic_T ( italic_G ) ( italic_m ( italic_G ) ) < caligraphic_T ( italic_F ) ( 1 ) . and

2. If n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N and G1,G2,,Gs𝒫f(),G1G2..Gs,G1=mG_{1},G_{2},...,G_{s}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right),G_{1}\subset G% _{2}\subset.....\subset G_{s},\mid G_{1}\mid=mitalic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊂ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊂ … . . ⊂ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∣ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∣ = italic_m, and fiGi,i=1,2,,s.formulae-sequencesubscript𝑓𝑖subscript𝐺𝑖𝑖12𝑠f_{i}\in G_{i},i=1,2,...,s.italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i = 1 , 2 , … , italic_s . then

i=1s((j=1m(Gi)α(Gi)(j)fi(𝒯(Gi)(j))α(Gi)(m(Gi)+1))Cm\prod_{i=1}^{s}\left(\left(\prod_{j=1}^{m(G_{i})}\alpha(G_{i})(j)*f_{i}(% \mathcal{T}(G_{i})(j)\right)*\alpha(G_{i})(m(G_{i})+1)\right)\in C_{m}∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_j ) ∗ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_T ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_j ) ) ∗ italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_m ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 1 ) ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Proof.

We assume Cn+1Cnsubscript𝐶𝑛1subscript𝐶𝑛C_{n+1}\subseteq C_{n}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N ( If not, consider Bn=i=1nCisubscript𝐵𝑛superscriptsubscript𝑖1𝑛subscript𝐶𝑖B_{n}=\cap_{i=1}^{n}C_{i}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , so Bn+1Bnsubscript𝐵𝑛1subscript𝐵𝑛B_{n+1}\subseteq B_{n}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) . For each n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N, let Cn={xCn:x1Cnr}.superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛conditional-set𝑥subscript𝐶𝑛superscript𝑥1subscript𝐶𝑛𝑟C_{n}^{*}=\left\{x\in C_{n}:x^{-1}C_{n}\in r\right\}.italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = { italic_x ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_r } . Then Cnrsuperscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑟C_{n}^{*}\in ritalic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_r and by Lemma 2.11𝐿𝑒𝑚𝑚𝑎 2.11Lemma\text{ }2.11italic_L italic_e italic_m italic_m italic_a 2.11 if xCn𝑥superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛x\in C_{n}^{*}italic_x ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT then x1Cnrsuperscript𝑥1superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑟x^{-1}C_{n}^{*}\in ritalic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_r

Now we use induction hypothesis to prove the statement

Let F=1delimited-∣∣𝐹1\mid F\mid=1∣ italic_F ∣ = 1 and F={f}𝐹𝑓F=\left\{f\right\}italic_F = { italic_f }. Then statement 1 is vacuously true. Pick dS𝑑𝑆d\in Sitalic_d ∈ italic_S and let L={d}.𝐿𝑑L=\left\{d\right\}.italic_L = { italic_d } . Pick m𝑚m\in\mathbb{N}italic_m ∈ blackboard_N, aSm+1𝑎superscript𝑆𝑚1a\in S^{m+1}italic_a ∈ italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and t𝒥m𝑡subscript𝒥𝑚t\in\mathcal{J}_{m}italic_t ∈ caligraphic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT such that i=1ma(i)f(t(i))a(m+1)C1superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖1𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑓𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑚1superscriptsubscript𝐶1\prod_{i=1}^{m}a\left(i\right)*f\left(t\left(i\right)\right)*a\left(m+1\right)% \in C_{1}^{*}∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a ( italic_i ) ∗ italic_f ( italic_t ( italic_i ) ) ∗ italic_a ( italic_m + 1 ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

Let m(F)=m𝑚𝐹𝑚m\left(F\right)=mitalic_m ( italic_F ) = italic_m , α(F)=a𝛼𝐹𝑎\alpha\left(F\right)=aitalic_α ( italic_F ) = italic_a , γ(F)=t𝛾𝐹𝑡\gamma(F)=titalic_γ ( italic_F ) = italic_t ( By lemma 3.1)

Now let the statement is true for all F𝐹Fitalic_F with F<ndelimited-∣∣𝐹𝑛\mid F\mid<n∣ italic_F ∣ < italic_n , n.𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}.italic_n ∈ blackboard_N .

Let

Mm={i=1s((j=1m(Gi)α(Gi)(j)fi(𝒯(Gi)(j))α(Gi)(m(Gi)+1)):s,G1=m and for each i{1,2,3,s},fiGi,ϕG1G2.GsF}M_{m}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{c}\prod_{i=1}^{s}\left(\left(\prod_{j=1}^{m(G_{i}% )}\alpha(G_{i})(j)*f_{i}(\mathcal{T}(G_{i})(j)\right)*\alpha(G_{i})(m(G_{i})+1% )\right):\\ s\in\mathbb{N},\mid G_{1}\mid=m\text{ and for each }i\in\left\{1,2,3...,s% \right\},\\ f_{i}\in G_{i},\phi\subsetneq G_{1}\subsetneq G_{2}\subsetneq....\subsetneq G_% {s}\subsetneq F\end{array}\right\}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = { start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_j ) ∗ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_T ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_j ) ) ∗ italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_m ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 1 ) ) : end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_s ∈ blackboard_N , ∣ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∣ = italic_m and for each italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , 3 … , italic_s } , end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ϕ ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ … . ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ italic_F end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY }

where m{1,2,.,n1}m\in\left\{1,2,....,n-1\right\}italic_m ∈ { 1 , 2 , … . , italic_n - 1 }.

Then Mmsubscript𝑀𝑚M_{m}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is finite and by induction MmCmsubscript𝑀𝑚superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚M_{m}\subseteq C_{m}^{*}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Let A=Cn(m=1n1(xMm(x1Cm)))𝐴superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛superscriptsubscript𝑚1𝑛1subscript𝑥subscript𝑀𝑚superscript𝑥1superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚A=C_{n}^{*}\cap\left(\cap_{m=1}^{n-1}\left(\bigcap_{x\in M_{m}}\left(x^{-1}C_{% m}^{*}\right)\right)\right)italic_A = italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∩ ( ∩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ⋂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x ∈ italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) ).

Then Ar,𝐴𝑟A\in r,italic_A ∈ italic_r , so A𝐴Aitalic_A is a J𝐽Jitalic_J-set.

Let d=max{𝒯(G)m(G):ϕGF}𝑑𝑚𝑎𝑥conditional-set𝒯𝐺𝑚𝐺italic-ϕ𝐺𝐹d=max\left\{\mathcal{T}\left(G\right)m\left(G\right):\phi\neq G\subsetneq F\right\}italic_d = italic_m italic_a italic_x { caligraphic_T ( italic_G ) italic_m ( italic_G ) : italic_ϕ ≠ italic_G ⊊ italic_F }.

By lemma 3.1 pick k𝑘k\in\mathbb{N}italic_k ∈ blackboard_N,aSk+1𝑎superscript𝑆𝑘1a\in S^{k+1}italic_a ∈ italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTand t𝒥k𝑡subscript𝒥𝑘t\in\mathcal{J}_{k}italic_t ∈ caligraphic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT such that t(1)>d𝑡1𝑑t\left(1\right)>ditalic_t ( 1 ) > italic_d and for all fFabsent𝐹\in F∈ italic_F.

i=1ka(i)f(t(i))a(k+1)Asuperscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖1𝑘𝑎𝑖𝑓𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑘1𝐴\prod_{i=1}^{k}a\left(i\right)*f\left(t\left(i\right)\right)*a\left(k+1\right)\in A∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a ( italic_i ) ∗ italic_f ( italic_t ( italic_i ) ) ∗ italic_a ( italic_k + 1 ) ∈ italic_A

Define m(F)=k𝑚𝐹𝑘m\left(F\right)=kitalic_m ( italic_F ) = italic_k, α(F)=a𝛼𝐹𝑎\alpha\left(F\right)=aitalic_α ( italic_F ) = italic_a, 𝒯(F)=t 𝒯𝐹t\mathcal{\text{ }T}\left(F\right)=\text{t}caligraphic_T ( italic_F ) = t. So (1) is satisfied.

To verify hypothesis (2) assume s=1𝑠1s=1italic_s = 1, then G1=Fsubscript𝐺1𝐹G_{1}=Fitalic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_F and m=n𝑚𝑛m=nitalic_m = italic_n, so

i=1ma(i)fs(t(i))a(m+1)ACmsuperscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖1𝑚𝑎𝑖subscript𝑓𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑚1𝐴superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚\prod_{i=1}^{m}a\left(i\right)*f_{s}\left(t\left(i\right)\right)*a\left(m+1% \right)\in A\subseteq C_{m}^{*}∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a ( italic_i ) ∗ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ( italic_i ) ) ∗ italic_a ( italic_m + 1 ) ∈ italic_A ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

.

Let y=i=1s1((j=1m(Gi)α(Gi)(j)fi(𝒯(Gi)(j))α(Gi)(m(Gi)+1))y=\prod_{i=1}^{s-1}\left(\left(\prod_{j=1}^{m(G_{i})}\alpha\left(G_{i}\right)% \left(j\right)*f_{i}(\mathcal{T}(G_{i})(j)\right)*\alpha(G_{i})(m(G_{i})+1)\right)italic_y = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_j ) ∗ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_T ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_j ) ) ∗ italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_m ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 1 ) ).

Then yMm𝑦subscript𝑀𝑚y\in M_{m}italic_y ∈ italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , so i=1ma(i)fs(t(i))a(m+1)y1Cmsuperscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖1𝑚𝑎𝑖subscript𝑓𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑚1superscript𝑦1superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚\prod_{i=1}^{m}a\left(i\right)*f_{s}\left(t\left(i\right)\right)*a\left(m+1% \right)\in y^{-1}C_{m}^{*}∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a ( italic_i ) ∗ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ( italic_i ) ) ∗ italic_a ( italic_m + 1 ) ∈ italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

therefore

i=1s((j=1m(Gi)α(Gi)(j)fi(𝒯(Gi)(j))α(Gi)(m(Gi)+1))CmCm\prod_{i=1}^{s}\left(\left(\prod_{j=1}^{m(G_{i})}\alpha(G_{i})(j)*f_{i}(% \mathcal{T}(G_{i})(j)\right)*\alpha(G_{i})(m(G_{i})+1)\right)\in C_{m}^{*}% \subseteq C_{m}∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ( ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_j ) ∗ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_T ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_j ) ) ∗ italic_α ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( italic_m ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 1 ) ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

.

Corollary 3.3.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be a commutative adequate partial semigroup and let r𝑟ritalic_r be an idempotent in J(S)𝐽𝑆J\left(S\right)italic_J ( italic_S ) and let (Cn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑛1\left(C_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be a sequence of members of r𝑟ritalic_r. Then there exists functions

γ:𝒫f()S:𝛾subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆\gamma:\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right)\to Sitalic_γ : caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) → italic_S and H:𝒫f()𝒫f():𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓subscript𝒫𝑓H:\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right)\to\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_H : caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) → caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that

(1)1\left(1\right)( 1 ) if F,G𝒫f()𝐹𝐺subscript𝒫𝑓F,G\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right)italic_F , italic_G ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) and GF𝐺𝐹G\subsetneq Fitalic_G ⊊ italic_F then maxH(G)<minH(F)𝑚𝑎𝑥𝐻𝐺𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐻𝐹maxH\left(G\right)<minH\left(F\right)italic_m italic_a italic_x italic_H ( italic_G ) < italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H ( italic_F )and

(2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ) if n,G1,G2,.,Gn𝒫f()n\in\mathbb{N},G_{1},G_{2},....,G_{n}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right)italic_n ∈ blackboard_N , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … . , italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F );G1G2.GnG_{1}\subsetneq G_{2}\subsetneq....\subsetneq G_{n}italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ … . ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT;G1=mdelimited-∣∣subscript𝐺1𝑚\mid G_{1}\mid=m∣ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∣ = italic_m and for each i{1,2,.,n},fiGi,i\in\left\{1,2,....,n\right\},f_{i}\in G_{i},italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … . , italic_n } , italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , then i=1n(γ(Gi)tH(Gi)fi(t))Cmsuperscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖1𝑛𝛾subscript𝐺𝑖subscriptproduct𝑡𝐻subscript𝐺𝑖subscript𝑓𝑖𝑡superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚\prod_{i=1}^{n}\left(\gamma\left(G_{i}\right)*\prod_{t\in H\left(G_{i}\right)}% f_{i}\left(t\right)\right)\in C_{m}^{*}∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_γ ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∗ ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

Proof.

Let m,α𝑚𝛼m,\alphaitalic_m , italic_α and 𝒯𝒯\mathcal{T}caligraphic_T be as guaranteed by previous theorem. For F𝒫f(),𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathcal{F}\right),italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( caligraphic_F ) ,Let γ(F)=j=1m(F)+1α(F)(j)𝛾𝐹superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗1𝑚𝐹1𝛼𝐹𝑗\gamma\left(F\right)=\prod_{j=1}^{m\left(F\right)+1}\alpha\left(F\right)\left(% j\right)italic_γ ( italic_F ) = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m ( italic_F ) + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_α ( italic_F ) ( italic_j ) and let H(F)={𝒯(F)(j):j{1,2,,m(F)}}𝐻𝐹conditional-set𝒯𝐹𝑗𝑗12𝑚𝐹H\left(F\right)=\left\{\mathcal{T}\left(F\right)\left(j\right):j\in\left\{1,2,% ...,m\left(F\right)\right\}\right\}italic_H ( italic_F ) = { caligraphic_T ( italic_F ) ( italic_j ) : italic_j ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_m ( italic_F ) } }. ∎

Corollary 3.4.

Let (S,)𝑆\left(S,*\right)( italic_S , ∗ ) be a non trivial commutative adequate partial semigroup,let r𝑟ritalic_r be an idempotent in J(S)𝐽𝑆J(S)italic_J ( italic_S ), Let (Cn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑛1\left(C_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be a sequence of members of r𝑟ritalic_r, let k𝑘k\in\mathbb{N}italic_k ∈ blackboard_N and for each l{1,2,,k}𝑙12𝑘l\in\left\{1,2,...,k\right\}italic_l ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_k },let (yl,n)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑦𝑙𝑛𝑛1\left(y_{l,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTbe an adequate sequence in S𝑆Sitalic_S. Then there exists a sequence (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin S𝑆Sitalic_S and a sequence (Hn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐻𝑛𝑛1\left(H_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) with maxHn<minHn+1subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝐻𝑛1\max H_{n}<\min H_{n+1}roman_max italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < roman_min italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTfor each n𝑛nitalic_n such that for l{1,2,.,k}l\in\left\{1,2,....,k\right\}italic_l ∈ { 1 , 2 , … . , italic_k }and for each F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) with m=minF𝑚𝐹m=\min Fitalic_m = roman_min italic_F one has

nF(antHnyl,t)Cmsubscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑎𝑛subscriptproduct𝑡subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑦𝑙𝑡subscript𝐶𝑚\prod_{n\in F}\left(a_{n}*\prod_{t\in H_{n}}y_{l,t}\right)\in C_{m}∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Proof.

We may assume that Cn+1Cnsubscript𝐶𝑛1subscript𝐶𝑛C_{n+1}\subseteq C_{n}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N. Pick γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ and H𝐻Hitalic_H as guarnteed by previous corollary. Choose γusubscript𝛾𝑢\gamma_{u}\in\mathcal{F}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_F\{(y1,n)n=1,(y2,n)n=1,,(yk,n)n=1}superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑦1𝑛𝑛1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑦2𝑛𝑛1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑦𝑘𝑛𝑛1\left\{\left(y_{1,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty},\left(y_{2,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}% ,...,\left(y_{k,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}\right\}{ ( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , ( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , ( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } such that γuγvsubscript𝛾𝑢subscript𝛾𝑣\gamma_{u}\neq\gamma_{v}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT if uv𝑢𝑣u\neq vitalic_u ≠ italic_v which we can do because S is non trivial. For u𝑢u\in\mathbb{N}italic_u ∈ blackboard_N let

Gu={(y1,n)n=1,(y2,n)n=1,,(yk,n)n=1} {γ1,γ2,,γu}subscript𝐺𝑢{(y1,n)n=1,(y2,n)n=1,,(yk,n)n=1} subscript𝛾1subscript𝛾2subscript𝛾𝑢G_{u}=\text{$\left\{\left(y_{1,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty},\left(y_{2,n}\right)_{% n=1}^{\infty},...,\left(y_{k,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}\right\}$ $\cup$}\left\{% \gamma_{1},\gamma_{2},...,\gamma_{u}\right\}italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = { ( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , ( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , ( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ∪ { italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT }

Let au=γ(Gu)subscript𝑎𝑢𝛾subscript𝐺𝑢a_{u}=\gamma\left(G_{u}\right)italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_γ ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and Hu=H(Gu)subscript𝐻𝑢𝐻subscript𝐺𝑢H_{u}=H\left(G_{u}\right)italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_H ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). Let l{1,2,,k}𝑙12𝑘l\in\left\{1,2,...,k\right\}italic_l ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_k } and let F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) be enumerated in order as {n1,n2,ns}subscript𝑛1subscript𝑛2subscript𝑛𝑠\left\{n_{1},n_{2},...n_{s}\right\}{ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT }so that m=n1𝑚subscript𝑛1m=n_{1}italic_m = italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT then Gm=Gn1Gn2Gnssubscript𝐺𝑚subscript𝐺subscript𝑛1subscript𝐺subscript𝑛2subscript𝐺subscript𝑛𝑠G_{m}=G_{n_{1}}\subsetneq G_{n_{2}}\subsetneq...\subsetneq G_{n_{s}}italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊊ … ⊊ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Also for each i{1,2,,s}𝑖12𝑠i\in\left\{1,2,...,s\right\}italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_s },(yl,t)t=1Gnisuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑦𝑙𝑡𝑡1subscript𝐺subscript𝑛𝑖\left(y_{l,t}\right)_{t=1}^{\infty}\in G_{n_{i}}( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Gn1=m+kdelimited-∣∣subscript𝐺subscript𝑛1𝑚𝑘\mid G_{n_{1}}\mid=m+k∣ italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∣ = italic_m + italic_k , so nF(antHnyl,t)=i=1s(γ(Gni)tH(Gni)yl,t)Cm+kCmsubscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑎𝑛subscriptproduct𝑡subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑦𝑙𝑡superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑖1𝑠𝛾subscript𝐺subscript𝑛𝑖subscriptproduct𝑡𝐻subscript𝐺subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑦𝑙𝑡subscript𝐶𝑚𝑘subscript𝐶𝑚\prod_{n\in F}\left(a_{n}*\prod_{t\in H_{n}}y_{l,t}\right)=\prod_{i=1}^{s}% \left(\gamma\left(G_{n_{i}}\right)*\prod_{t\in H\left(G_{n_{i}}\right)}y_{l,t}% \right)\in C_{m+k}\subseteq C_{m}∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∗ ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_γ ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∗ ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H ( italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m + italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. ∎

Now we will see some combinatorial applications.

Definition 3.5.

Let u,v𝑢𝑣u,v\in\mathbb{N}italic_u , italic_v ∈ blackboard_N and let A𝐴Aitalic_A be a u×v𝑢𝑣u\times vitalic_u × italic_v matrix with entries from .\mathbb{Q}.blackboard_Q . Then A𝐴Aitalic_A satisfies the first entries conditions if and only if no row of A𝐴Aitalic_A is 00\overrightarrow{0}over→ start_ARG 0 end_ARG and whenever i,j{1,2,,u}𝑖𝑗12𝑢i,j\in\left\{1,2,...,u\right\}italic_i , italic_j ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_u } and k=min{t{1,2,,v}:ai,t0}=min{t{1,2,,v}:aj,t0},𝑘𝑚𝑖𝑛conditional-set𝑡12𝑣subscript𝑎𝑖𝑡0𝑚𝑖𝑛conditional-set𝑡12𝑣subscript𝑎𝑗𝑡0k=min\left\{t\in\left\{1,2,...,v\right\}:a_{i,t}\neq 0\right\}=min\left\{t\in% \left\{1,2,...,v\right\}:a_{j,t}\neq 0\right\},italic_k = italic_m italic_i italic_n { italic_t ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_v } : italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ 0 } = italic_m italic_i italic_n { italic_t ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_v } : italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ 0 } ,then ai,t=aj,t>0.subscript𝑎𝑖𝑡subscript𝑎𝑗𝑡0a_{i,t}=a_{j,t}>0.italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 . An element b𝑏b\in\mathbb{Q}italic_b ∈ blackboard_Q is a first entry of A𝐴Aitalic_A if and only if there is some row i𝑖iitalic_i of A𝐴Aitalic_A such that b=ai,k where k=min{t{1,2,,v}:ai,t0}.𝑏subscript𝑎𝑖𝑘 where 𝑘𝑚𝑖𝑛conditional-set𝑡12𝑣subscript𝑎𝑖𝑡0b=a_{i,k}\text{ where }k=min\left\{t\in\left\{1,2,...,v\right\}:a_{i,t}\neq 0% \right\}.italic_b = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT where italic_k = italic_m italic_i italic_n { italic_t ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_v } : italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ 0 } .

If A𝐴Aitalic_A satisfies the first entries condition , we say that A𝐴Aitalic_A is a first entries matrix.

Theorem 3.6.

Let S𝑆Sitalic_S be a commutative adequate partial semigroup and A𝐴Aitalic_A be a u×v𝑢𝑣u\times vitalic_u × italic_v matrix which satisfies the first entries condition. Let (Cn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑛1\left(C_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be central subsets of S𝑆Sitalic_S . Assume that for each first entry c𝑐citalic_c of A𝐴Aitalic_A, and for each n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N, cSCn𝑐𝑆subscript𝐶𝑛cS\cap C_{n}italic_c italic_S ∩ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a central* set. Then for each i=1,2,,v𝑖12𝑣i=1,2,\cdots,vitalic_i = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , italic_v there exists adequate sequence in S𝑆Sitalic_S (xi,n)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑥𝑖𝑛𝑛1\left(x_{i,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT such that for every F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) with minF=m𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑚min\,F=mitalic_m italic_i italic_n italic_F = italic_m, we have AxF(Cm)u,𝐴subscript𝑥𝐹superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚𝑢A\overrightarrow{x}_{F}\in\left(C_{m}\right)^{u},italic_A over→ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ ( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,where xFSvsubscript𝑥𝐹superscript𝑆𝑣\overrightarrow{x}_{F}\in S^{v}over→ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_S start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .

xF=(nFx1,nnFx2,nnFxv,n).subscript𝑥𝐹𝑛𝐹productsubscript𝑥1𝑛𝑛𝐹productsubscript𝑥2𝑛𝑛𝐹productsubscript𝑥𝑣𝑛\overrightarrow{x}_{F}=\left(\begin{array}[]{c}\underset{n\in F}{\prod}x_{1,n}% \\ \underset{n\in F}{\prod}x_{2,n}\\ \vdots\\ \underset{n\in F}{\prod}x_{v,n}\end{array}\right).over→ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL start_UNDERACCENT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_UNDERACCENT start_ARG ∏ end_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL start_UNDERACCENT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_UNDERACCENT start_ARG ∏ end_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL start_UNDERACCENT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_UNDERACCENT start_ARG ∏ end_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY ) .
Proof.

We can assume that Cn+1Cnsubscript𝐶𝑛1subscript𝐶𝑛C_{n+1}\subseteq C_{n}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. First we take v=1𝑣1v=1italic_v = 1. We can assume that A𝐴Aitalic_A has no repeated rows. In that case A=(c)𝐴𝑐A=\left(c\right)italic_A = ( italic_c ) for some c𝑐c\in\mathbb{N}italic_c ∈ blackboard_N such that cS𝑐𝑆cSitalic_c italic_S is a central* set and (CncS)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑐𝑆𝑛1\left(C_{n}\cap cS\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∩ italic_c italic_S ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a sequence of members of pK(δS)𝑝𝐾𝛿𝑆p\in K(\delta S)italic_p ∈ italic_K ( italic_δ italic_S ), satisfying Cn+1cSCncSsubscript𝐶𝑛1𝑐𝑆subscript𝐶𝑛𝑐𝑆C_{n+1}\cap cS\subseteq C_{n}\cap cSitalic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∩ italic_c italic_S ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∩ italic_c italic_S.

Since we are in the base case, i.e. v=1𝑣1v=1italic_v = 1, by Corollary 3.4 , we have adequate sequences (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTand (y1,n)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑦1𝑛𝑛1\left(y_{1,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in S𝑆Sitalic_S with y1,n=0subscript𝑦1𝑛0y_{1,n}=0italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 for all n𝑛nitalic_n, such that nFanCmcSsubscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑎𝑛subscript𝐶𝑚𝑐𝑆\prod_{n\in F}a_{n}\in C_{m}\cap cS∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∩ italic_c italic_S where minF=m𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑚min\,F=mitalic_m italic_i italic_n italic_F = italic_m. We choose cx1,n=an𝑐subscript𝑥1𝑛subscript𝑎𝑛cx_{1,n}=a_{n}italic_c italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. So the sequence (x1,n)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑥1𝑛𝑛1\left(x_{1,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is as required.

Now assume v𝑣v\in\mathbb{N}italic_v ∈ blackboard_N and the theorem is true for v𝑣vitalic_v. Let, A𝐴Aitalic_A be a u×(v+1)𝑢𝑣1u\times(v+1)italic_u × ( italic_v + 1 ) matrix which satisfies the first entries condition, and assume that for every first entry c𝑐citalic_c of A𝐴Aitalic_A, CncSsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑐𝑆C_{n}\cap cSitalic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∩ italic_c italic_S is a central* set for all n𝑛nitalic_n. By rearranging rows of A𝐴Aitalic_A and adding additional rows of A𝐴Aitalic_A if needed, we may assume that we have some t{1,2,..,u1}t\in\{1,2,..,u-1\}italic_t ∈ { 1 , 2 , . . , italic_u - 1 } and d𝑑d\in\mathbb{N}italic_d ∈ blackboard_N such that

ai,1={0difitifi>t.subscript𝑎𝑖1cases0𝑑if𝑖𝑡if𝑖𝑡a_{i,1}=\begin{cases}\begin{array}[]{c}0\\ d\end{array}&\begin{array}[]{c}\text{if}\>i\leq t\\ \text{if}\>i>t\end{array}\end{cases}.italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = { start_ROW start_CELL start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_d end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY end_CELL start_CELL start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL if italic_i ≤ italic_t end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL if italic_i > italic_t end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY end_CELL end_ROW .

So the matrix in block form looks like

(0¯d¯)¯0¯𝑑\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\bar{0}&\mathcal{B}\\ \bar{d}&*\end{array}\right)( start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL over¯ start_ARG 0 end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL caligraphic_B end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over¯ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL ∗ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY )

where \mathcal{B}caligraphic_B is a t×v𝑡𝑣t\times vitalic_t × italic_v matrix with entries bi,j=ai,j+1subscript𝑏𝑖𝑗subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗1b_{i,j}=a_{i,j+1}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. So by inductive hypothesis we can choose (wi,n)n=1,i={1,2,,v}superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑛1𝑖12𝑣\left(w_{i,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty},i=\left\{1,2,\cdots,v\right\}( italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_i = { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , italic_v } for the matrix \mathcal{B}caligraphic_B.

Let for each i{t+1,t+2,,u}𝑖𝑡1𝑡2𝑢i\in\left\{t+1,t+2,\cdots,u\right\}italic_i ∈ { italic_t + 1 , italic_t + 2 , ⋯ , italic_u } and each n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N,

yi,n=j=2v+1ai,jwj1,n.subscript𝑦𝑖𝑛superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗2𝑣1subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscript𝑤𝑗1𝑛y_{i,n}=\prod_{j=2}^{v+1}a_{i,j}\cdotp w_{j-1,n}.italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j - 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

Now we have that (CndS)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑑𝑆𝑛1\left(C_{n}\cap dS\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∩ italic_d italic_S ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a sequence of members of pK(δS)𝑝𝐾𝛿𝑆p\in K(\delta S)italic_p ∈ italic_K ( italic_δ italic_S ). So by Corollary3.4 we can choose (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒯𝒯\mathcal{T}caligraphic_T and (Hn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐻𝑛𝑛1\left(H_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that maxHn<minHn+1𝑚𝑎𝑥subscript𝐻𝑛𝑚𝑖𝑛subscript𝐻𝑛1max\,H_{n}<min\,H_{n+1}italic_m italic_a italic_x italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_Nand for each i{t+1,t+2,,u}𝑖𝑡1𝑡2𝑢i\in\left\{t+1,t+2,\cdots,u\right\}italic_i ∈ { italic_t + 1 , italic_t + 2 , ⋯ , italic_u } and for all F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) with minF=m𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑚min\,F=mitalic_m italic_i italic_n italic_F = italic_m, then

nF(ansHnyi,s)CmdS.subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑎𝑛subscriptproduct𝑠subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑦𝑖𝑠subscript𝐶𝑚𝑑𝑆\prod_{n\in F}\left(a_{n}\prod_{s\in H_{n}}y_{i,s}\right)\in C_{m}\cap dS.∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∩ italic_d italic_S .

In particular if F={n}𝐹𝑛F=\left\{n\right\}italic_F = { italic_n } then pick x1,nSsubscript𝑥1𝑛𝑆x_{1,n}\in Sitalic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_S such that an=dx1,nsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑑subscript𝑥1𝑛a_{n}=d\cdotp x_{1,n}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_d ⋅ italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. For j{2,3,,v+1}𝑗23𝑣1j\in\left\{2,3,\cdots,v+1\right\}italic_j ∈ { 2 , 3 , ⋯ , italic_v + 1 }, define xj,n=sHnwj1,ssubscript𝑥𝑗𝑛subscriptproduct𝑠subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑤𝑗1𝑠x_{j,n}=\prod_{s\in H_{n}}w_{j-1,s}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j - 1 , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The proof will be done if we can show that (xj,n)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑥𝑗𝑛𝑛1\left(x_{j,n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are the required sequences. So we need to show that for each i{1,2,,u}𝑖12𝑢i\in\left\{1,2,\cdots,u\right\}italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , ⋯ , italic_u },

j=1v+1ai,jnFxj,nCm.superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗1𝑣1subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑥𝑗𝑛subscript𝐶𝑚\prod_{j=1}^{v+1}a_{i,j}\prod_{n\in F}x_{j,n}\in C_{m}.∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

If it𝑖𝑡i\leq titalic_i ≤ italic_t, then,

j=1v+1(ai,jnFxj,n)=j=2v+1(ai,jnFsHnwj1,s)=j=1v(bi,jsHwj,s)superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗1𝑣1subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑥𝑗𝑛absentsuperscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗2𝑣1subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscriptproduct𝑠subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑤𝑗1𝑠missing-subexpressionabsentsuperscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗1𝑣subscript𝑏𝑖𝑗subscriptproduct𝑠𝐻subscript𝑤𝑗𝑠\begin{array}[]{cc}\prod_{j=1}^{v+1}\left(a_{i,j}\prod_{n\in F}x_{j,n}\right)&% =\prod_{j=2}^{v+1}\left(a_{i,j}\prod_{n\in F}\prod_{s\in H_{n}}w_{j-1,s}\right% )\\ &=\prod_{j=1}^{v}\left(b_{i,j}\prod_{s\in H}w_{j,s}\right)\end{array}start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL start_CELL = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j - 1 , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY

where H=nFHn𝐻subscript𝑛𝐹subscript𝐻𝑛H=\bigcup_{n\in F}H_{n}italic_H = ⋃ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Let m=minHsuperscript𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐻m^{\prime}=min\,Hitalic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H, then mmsuperscript𝑚𝑚m^{\prime}\geq mitalic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≥ italic_m due to the condition that maxHn<minHn+1𝑚𝑎𝑥subscript𝐻𝑛𝑚𝑖𝑛subscript𝐻𝑛1max\,H_{n}<min\,H_{n+1}italic_m italic_a italic_x italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N. Now by induction hypothesis we have,

j=1v+1(ai,jnFxj,n)=j=1v(bi,jsHwj,s)CmCm.superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗1𝑣1subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑥𝑗𝑛superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗1𝑣subscript𝑏𝑖𝑗subscriptproduct𝑠𝐻subscript𝑤𝑗𝑠subscript𝐶superscript𝑚subscript𝐶𝑚\prod_{j=1}^{v+1}\left(a_{i,j}\prod_{n\in F}x_{j,n}\right)=\prod_{j=1}^{v}% \left(b_{i,j}\prod_{s\in H}w_{j,s}\right)\in C_{m^{\prime}}\subseteq C_{m}.∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

For the case i>t𝑖𝑡i>titalic_i > italic_t,

j=1v+1(ai,jnFxj,n)=ai,1nFxi,nj=2v+1(ai,jnFsHnwj1,s)=dnFx1,nj=2v+1(ai,jnFsHnwj1,s)=nFdx1,nnFsHnj=2v+1ai,jwj1,s=nF(ansHnyi,s)Cmsuperscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗1𝑣1subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑥𝑗𝑛absentsubscript𝑎𝑖1subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑥𝑖𝑛superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗2𝑣1subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscriptproduct𝑠subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑤𝑗1𝑠missing-subexpressionabsent𝑑subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑥1𝑛superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗2𝑣1subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscriptproduct𝑠subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑤𝑗1𝑠missing-subexpressionabsentsubscriptproduct𝑛𝐹𝑑subscript𝑥1𝑛subscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscriptproduct𝑠subscript𝐻𝑛superscriptsubscriptproduct𝑗2𝑣1subscript𝑎𝑖𝑗subscript𝑤𝑗1𝑠missing-subexpressionabsentsubscriptproduct𝑛𝐹subscript𝑎𝑛subscriptproduct𝑠subscript𝐻𝑛subscript𝑦𝑖𝑠subscript𝐶𝑚\begin{array}[]{cc}\prod_{j=1}^{v+1}\left(a_{i,j}\prod_{n\in F}x_{j,n}\right)&% =a_{i,1}\prod_{n\in F}x_{i,n}\prod_{j=2}^{v+1}\left(a_{i,j}\prod_{n\in F}\prod% _{s\in H_{n}}w_{j-1,s}\right)\\ &=d\prod_{n\in F}x_{1,n}\prod_{j=2}^{v+1}\left(a_{i,j}\prod_{n\in F}\prod_{s% \in H_{n}}w_{j-1,s}\right)\\ &=\prod_{n\in F}dx_{1,n}\prod_{n\in F}\prod_{s\in H_{n}}\prod_{j=2}^{v+1}a_{i,% j}w_{j-1,s}\\ &=\prod_{n\in F}\left(a_{n}\prod_{s\in H_{n}}y_{i,s}\right)\in C_{m}\end{array}start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL start_CELL = italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j - 1 , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = italic_d ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j - 1 , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j - 1 , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL = ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY

and the theorem is done.

xF=(nFx1,nnFx2,nnFxv,n).subscript𝑥𝐹𝑛𝐹productsubscript𝑥1𝑛𝑛𝐹productsubscript𝑥2𝑛𝑛𝐹productsubscript𝑥𝑣𝑛\overrightarrow{x}_{F}=\left(\begin{array}[]{c}\underset{n\in F}{\prod}x_{1,n}% \\ \underset{n\in F}{\prod}x_{2,n}\\ \vdots\\ \underset{n\in F}{\prod}x_{v,n}\end{array}\right).over→ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL start_UNDERACCENT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_UNDERACCENT start_ARG ∏ end_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL start_UNDERACCENT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_UNDERACCENT start_ARG ∏ end_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ⋮ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL start_UNDERACCENT italic_n ∈ italic_F end_UNDERACCENT start_ARG ∏ end_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY ) .

4. PHULARA VERSION OF CENTRAL SETS THEOREM FOR VIP SYSTEMS IN PARTIAL SEMIGROUP

Now we concentrate on a special class of finite families of VIP systems and proceed for further generalization of Central sets Theorem.

Definition 4.1.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be commutative adequate partial semigroup. A finite set {(vα(i))α𝒫f():1ik}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓1𝑖𝑘\left\{\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right)}:1\leq i\leq k\right\}{ ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : 1 ≤ italic_i ≤ italic_k } of VIP systems is said to be adequate𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒adequateitalic_a italic_d italic_e italic_q italic_u italic_a italic_t italic_e if there exists d,t,𝑑𝑡d,t\in\mathbb{N},italic_d , italic_t ∈ blackboard_N ,a set {(mγ)γd:i[k]},conditional-setsubscriptsubscript𝑚𝛾𝛾subscript𝑑𝑖delimited-[]𝑘\left\{\left(m_{\gamma}\right)_{\gamma\in\mathcal{F}_{d}}:i\in\left[k\right]% \right\},{ ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } ,a set of VIP systems

{(uα(i)=γα,γdnγ(i))α𝒫f():i[t]},conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑢𝛼𝑖subscriptformulae-sequence𝛾𝛼𝛾subscript𝑑superscriptsubscript𝑛𝛾𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓𝑖delimited-[]𝑡\left\{\left(u_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}=\sum_{\gamma\subseteq\alpha,\gamma\in% \mathcal{F}_{d}}n_{\gamma}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}% \left(\mathbb{N}\right)}:i\in\left[t\right]\right\},{ ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ⊆ italic_α , italic_γ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_t ] } ,

and sets E1,E2,,Ek{1,2,,t}subscript𝐸1subscript𝐸2subscript𝐸𝑘12𝑡E_{1},E_{2},...,E_{k}\subseteq\left\{1,2,...,t\right\}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_t } such that:

(1)1\left(1\right)( 1 ) For each i{1,2,,k},(mγ)γd𝑖12𝑘subscriptsubscript𝑚𝛾𝛾subscript𝑑i\in\left\{1,2,...,k\right\},\left(m_{\gamma}\right)_{\gamma\in\mathcal{F}_{d}}italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_k } , ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT generates (vα(i))αsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{F}}( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

(2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ) For every H𝒫f(S),𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆H\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right),italic_H ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) ,there exists m𝑚m\in\mathbb{N}italic_m ∈ blackboard_N such that for every l𝑙l\in\mathbb{N}italic_l ∈ blackboard_N and pairwise distinct γ1,γ2,,γldsubscript𝛾1subscript𝛾2subscript𝛾𝑙subscript𝑑\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2},...,\gamma_{l}\in\mathcal{F}_{d}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with each

γi{1,2,,m},i=1tj=1lnγj(i)σ(H){0}.formulae-sequencenot-subset-of-nor-equalssubscript𝛾𝑖12𝑚superscriptsubscript𝑖1𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑙superscriptsubscript𝑛subscript𝛾𝑗𝑖𝜎𝐻0\gamma_{i}\nsubseteq\left\{1,2,...,m\right\},\sum_{i=1}^{t}\sum_{j=1}^{l}n_{% \gamma_{j}}^{\left(i\right)}\in\sigma\left(H\right)\cup\left\{0\right\}.italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_m } , ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_σ ( italic_H ) ∪ { 0 } .

( In particular, the sum is defined)

(3)3\left(3\right)( 3 ) mγ(i)superscriptsubscript𝑚𝛾𝑖m_{\gamma}^{\left(i\right)}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT=tEinγ(t)subscript𝑡subscript𝐸𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑛𝛾𝑡\sum_{t\in E_{i}}n_{\gamma}^{\left(t\right)}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_t ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for all i{1,2,,k}𝑖12𝑘i\in\left\{1,2,...,k\right\}italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_k } and all γd𝛾subscript𝑑\gamma\in\mathcal{F}_{d}italic_γ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Definition 4.2.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative adequate partial semigroup and let 𝒜𝒫f(S).𝒜formulae-sequence𝒜subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆𝒜\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right).\mathcal{A}caligraphic_A ⊆ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) . caligraphic_A is said to be adequately partition regular𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑦 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟adequately\text{ }partition\text{ }regularitalic_a italic_d italic_e italic_q italic_u italic_a italic_t italic_e italic_l italic_y italic_p italic_a italic_r italic_t italic_i italic_t italic_i italic_o italic_n italic_r italic_e italic_g italic_u italic_l italic_a italic_r if for every finite subset H𝐻Hitalic_H of S𝑆Sitalic_S and every r,𝑟r\in\mathbb{N},italic_r ∈ blackboard_N , there exists a finite set Fσ(H)𝐹𝜎𝐻F\subseteq\sigma\left(H\right)italic_F ⊆ italic_σ ( italic_H ) having the property that if F=i=1rCi𝐹superscriptsubscript𝑖1𝑟subscript𝐶𝑖F=\cup_{i=1}^{r}C_{i}italic_F = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT then for some j{1,2,,r},Cj𝑗12𝑟subscript𝐶𝑗j\in\left\{1,2,...,r\right\},C_{j}italic_j ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_r } , italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT contains a member of 𝒜.𝒜\mathcal{A}.caligraphic_A . 𝒜𝒜\mathcal{A}caligraphic_A is said to be shift invariant𝑠𝑖𝑓𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡shift\text{ }invariantitalic_s italic_h italic_i italic_f italic_t italic_i italic_n italic_v italic_a italic_r italic_i italic_a italic_n italic_t if for all A𝒜𝐴𝒜A\in\mathcal{A}italic_A ∈ caligraphic_A and all xσ(A),A+x={a+x:aA}𝒜.formulae-sequence𝑥𝜎𝐴𝐴𝑥conditional-set𝑎𝑥𝑎𝐴𝒜x\in\sigma\left(A\right),A+x=\left\{a+x:a\in A\right\}\in\mathcal{A}.italic_x ∈ italic_σ ( italic_A ) , italic_A + italic_x = { italic_a + italic_x : italic_a ∈ italic_A } ∈ caligraphic_A .

Theorem 4.3.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative adequate partial semigroup and let k𝑘k\in\mathbb{N}italic_k ∈ blackboard_N. If {(vα(i))α𝒫f():1ik}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓1𝑖𝑘\left\{\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right)}:1\leq i\leq k\right\}{ ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : 1 ≤ italic_i ≤ italic_k } is an adequate set of VIP systems in S𝑆Sitalic_S , and β𝒫f()𝛽subscript𝒫𝑓\beta\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_β ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ), then the family

𝒜={{a,a+vα(1),a+vα(2),,a+vα(k)}:α𝒫f(),aσ({vα(1),vα(2),,vα(k)})and α>β}𝒜:𝑎𝑎superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼1𝑎superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼2𝑎superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑘absentformulae-sequence𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓𝑎𝜎superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼1superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼2superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑘𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝛼𝛽\mathcal{A}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{c}\left\{a,a+v_{\alpha}^{\left(1\right)},a+% v_{\alpha}^{\left(2\right)},...,a+v_{\alpha}^{\left(k\right)}\right\}:\\ \alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right),a\in\sigma\left(\left\{v_{% \alpha}^{\left(1\right)},v_{\alpha}^{\left(2\right)},...,v_{\alpha}^{\left(k% \right)}\right\}\right)and\text{ }\alpha>\beta\end{array}\right\}caligraphic_A = { start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL { italic_a , italic_a + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_a + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , italic_a + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_k ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } : end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) , italic_a ∈ italic_σ ( { italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_k ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ) italic_a italic_n italic_d italic_α > italic_β end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY }

is adequately partition regular.

Proof.

[HM], Theorem 3.73.73.73.7

Theorem 4.4.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative adequate partial semigroup and let 𝒜𝒜\mathcal{A}caligraphic_A be a shift invariant ,adequately partition regular family of finite subsets of S. Let ES𝐸𝑆E\subseteq Sitalic_E ⊆ italic_S be piecewise syndetic. Then E𝐸Eitalic_E contains a member of 𝒜𝒜\mathcal{A}caligraphic_A.

Proof.

[HM],Theorem 3.83.83.83.8

Theorem 4.5.

Let {(vα(i))α𝒫f():1ik}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓1𝑖𝑘\left\{\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right)}:1\leq i\leq k\right\}{ ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : 1 ≤ italic_i ≤ italic_k } be an adequate set of VIP systems and pick d,t𝑑𝑡d,t\in\mathbb{N}italic_d , italic_t ∈ blackboard_N, a set {(mγ(i))γd:1ik}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝛾𝑖𝛾subscript𝑑1𝑖𝑘\left\{\left(m_{\gamma}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\gamma\in\mathcal{F}_{d}}:1% \leq i\leq k\right\}{ ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : 1 ≤ italic_i ≤ italic_k }, a set of VIP systems

{(uα(i)=γα,γdnγ(i))α𝒫f():1it}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑢𝛼𝑖subscriptformulae-sequence𝛾𝛼𝛾subscript𝑑superscriptsubscript𝑛𝛾𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓1𝑖𝑡\left\{\left(u_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}=\sum_{\gamma\subseteq\alpha,\gamma\in% \mathcal{F}_{d}}n_{\gamma}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}% \left(\mathbb{N}\right)}:1\leq i\leq t\right\}{ ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ⊆ italic_α , italic_γ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : 1 ≤ italic_i ≤ italic_t },

and sets E1,E2,,Ek{1,2,,t}subscript𝐸1subscript𝐸2subscript𝐸𝑘12𝑡E_{1},E_{2},...,E_{k}\subseteq\left\{1,2,...,t\right\}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_t } satisfying conditions (1),(2),12\left(1\right),\left(2\right),( 1 ) , ( 2 ) ,and (3)3\left(3\right)( 3 ) of Definition 3.5. Let α1,α2,,αs𝒫f()subscript𝛼1subscript𝛼2subscript𝛼𝑠subscript𝒫𝑓\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2},...,\alpha_{s}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) with α1<α2<<αssubscript𝛼1subscript𝛼2subscript𝛼𝑠\alpha_{1}<\alpha_{2}<...<\alpha_{s}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < … < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. For F{1,2,,s}𝐹12𝑠F\subseteq\left\{1,2,...,s\right\}italic_F ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_s }, i{1,2,,k}𝑖12𝑘i\in\left\{1,2,...,k\right\}italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_k } and φd𝜑subscript𝑑\varphi\in\mathcal{F}_{d}italic_φ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with φ>αs𝜑subscript𝛼𝑠\varphi>\alpha_{s}italic_φ > italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and 1ik1𝑖𝑘1\leq i\leq k1 ≤ italic_i ≤ italic_k, let

bφ(i,F)=ψjFαj,ψdφmφψ(i)superscriptsubscript𝑏𝜑𝑖𝐹subscriptformulae-sequence𝜓subscript𝑗𝐹subscript𝛼𝑗delimited-∣∣𝜓𝑑delimited-∣∣𝜑superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜑𝜓𝑖b_{\varphi}^{\left(i,F\right)}=\sum_{\psi\subseteq\cup_{j\in F}\alpha_{j},\mid% \psi\mid\leq d-\mid\varphi\mid}m_{\varphi\cup\psi}^{\left(i\right)}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_φ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_F ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ ⊆ ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , ∣ italic_ψ ∣ ≤ italic_d - ∣ italic_φ ∣ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_φ ∪ italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

For F{1,2,,s}𝐹12𝑠F\subseteq\left\{1,2,...,s\right\}italic_F ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_s }, i{1,2,,k}𝑖12𝑘i\in\left\{1,2,...,k\right\}italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_k }, and βd𝛽subscript𝑑\beta\in\mathcal{F}_{d}italic_β ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with β>αs𝛽subscript𝛼𝑠\beta>\alpha_{s}italic_β > italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, let

qβ(i,F)=φβ,φdbφ(i,F)superscriptsubscript𝑞𝛽𝑖𝐹subscriptformulae-sequence𝜑𝛽𝜑subscript𝑑superscriptsubscript𝑏𝜑𝑖𝐹q_{\beta}^{\left(i,F\right)}=\sum_{\varphi\subseteq\beta,\varphi\in\mathcal{F}% _{d}}b_{\varphi}^{\left(i,F\right)}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_F ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_φ ⊆ italic_β , italic_φ ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_φ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_F ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Then {(qβ(i,F))β𝒫f(),β>αs:i[k],F{1,2,,s}}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑞𝛽𝑖𝐹formulae-sequence𝛽subscript𝒫𝑓𝛽subscript𝛼𝑠formulae-sequence𝑖delimited-[]𝑘𝐹12𝑠\left\{\left(q_{\beta}^{\left(i,F\right)}\right)_{\beta\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right),\beta>\alpha_{s}}:i\in\left[k\right],F\subseteq\left\{1,2,.% ..,s\right\}\right\}{ ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_F ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) , italic_β > italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] , italic_F ⊆ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_s } } is an adequate set of VIP systems.

Proof.

[HM], Theorem 3.10 ∎

Theorem 4.6.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be commutative adequate partial semigroup and p𝑝pitalic_p be an idempotent in K(δS)𝐾𝛿𝑆K\left(\delta S\right)italic_K ( italic_δ italic_S )and let (Cn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑛1\left(C_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT be a sequence of members of p𝑝pitalic_p and

{(vα(i))α𝒫f():1ik}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓1𝑖𝑘\left\{\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right)}:1\leq i\leq k\right\}{ ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : 1 ≤ italic_i ≤ italic_k }

be k𝑘kitalic_k-many adequate set of VIP system. Then there exists sequences (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin S𝑆Sitalic_S and (αn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that αn<αn+1subscript𝛼𝑛subscript𝛼𝑛1\alpha_{n}<\alpha_{n+1}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for every n𝑛nitalic_n and for every F𝒫f(),𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right),italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) ,γ=tFαt𝛾subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma=\cup_{t\in F}\alpha_{t}italic_γ = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT such that for m=minF𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐹m=minFitalic_m = italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_F

{tFat}{tFat+vγ(i):1ik}Cm.subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡conditional-setsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝑖1𝑖𝑘subscript𝐶𝑚\left\{\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}\right\}\cup\left\{\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}+v_{\gamma}^{% \left(i\right)}:1\leq i\leq k\right\}\subseteq C_{m}.{ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ∪ { ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : 1 ≤ italic_i ≤ italic_k } ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .

Proof.

Let CnpK(δS).subscript𝐶𝑛𝑝𝐾𝛿𝑆C_{n}\in p\in K\left(\delta S\right).italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_p ∈ italic_K ( italic_δ italic_S ) .We assume Cn+1Cnsubscript𝐶𝑛1subscript𝐶𝑛C_{n+1}\subseteq C_{n}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N ( If not, consider Bn=i=1nCisubscript𝐵𝑛superscriptsubscript𝑖1𝑛subscript𝐶𝑖B_{n}=\cap_{i=1}^{n}C_{i}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , so Bn+1Bnsubscript𝐵𝑛1subscript𝐵𝑛B_{n+1}\subseteq B_{n}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). Let for each n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N, let

Cn={xCn:x+Cnp}.superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛conditional-set𝑥subscript𝐶𝑛𝑥subscript𝐶𝑛𝑝C_{n}^{*}=\left\{x\in C_{n}:-x+C_{n}\in p\right\}.italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = { italic_x ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : - italic_x + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_p } .

Then for each xCn𝑥superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛x\in C_{n}^{*}italic_x ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , x+Cnp𝑥superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑝-x+C_{n}^{*}\in p- italic_x + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_p by lemma 2.12. ∎

Let

𝒜={{a,a+vα(1),a+vα(2),,a+vα(k)}:α𝒫f(),aσ({vα(1),vα(2),,vα(k)})}𝒜conditional-set𝑎𝑎superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼1𝑎superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼2𝑎superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑘formulae-sequence𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓𝑎𝜎superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼1superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼2superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑘\mathcal{A}=\left\{\left\{a,a+v_{\alpha}^{\left(1\right)},a+v_{\alpha}^{\left(% 2\right)},...,a+v_{\alpha}^{\left(k\right)}\right\}:\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}% \left(\mathbb{N}\right),a\in\sigma\left(\left\{v_{\alpha}^{\left(1\right)},v_{% \alpha}^{\left(2\right)},...,v_{\alpha}^{\left(k\right)}\right\}\right)\right\}caligraphic_A = { { italic_a , italic_a + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_a + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , italic_a + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_k ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } : italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) , italic_a ∈ italic_σ ( { italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_k ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ) }

Then by theorem 4.3 𝒜𝒜\mathcal{A}caligraphic_A is adequately partition regular and 𝒜𝒜\mathcal{A}caligraphic_A is trivially shift invariant. Since for each n,Cnpformulae-sequence𝑛superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑝n\in\mathbb{N},C_{n}^{*}\in pitalic_n ∈ blackboard_N , italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_p and pK(δS)𝑝𝐾𝛿𝑆p\in K\left(\delta S\right)italic_p ∈ italic_K ( italic_δ italic_S ) ,Cnsuperscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛C_{n}^{*}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is piecewise syndetic. So by theorem 4.4 , for some a1Ssubscript𝑎1𝑆a_{1}\in Sitalic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_S and α1𝒫f()subscript𝛼1subscript𝒫𝑓\alpha_{1}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that

{a1,a1+vα1(1),a1+vα1(2),,a1+vα1(k)}Cnsubscript𝑎1subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscript𝑣subscript𝛼11subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscript𝑣subscript𝛼12subscript𝑎1superscriptsubscript𝑣subscript𝛼1𝑘superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛\left\{a_{1},a_{1}+v_{\alpha_{1}}^{\left(1\right)},a_{1}+v_{\alpha_{1}}^{\left% (2\right)},...,a_{1}+v_{\alpha_{1}}^{\left(k\right)}\right\}\subseteq C_{n}^{*}{ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_k ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

for every n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N .

Now the proof is by induction, let n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N and assume that we have chosen (at)t=1nsuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑡𝑡1𝑛\left(a_{t}\right)_{t=1}^{n}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin S𝑆Sitalic_S and (αt)t=1nsuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑡𝑡1𝑛\left(\alpha_{t}\right)_{t=1}^{n}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that

(1)1\left(1\right)( 1 ) for t[n1]𝑡delimited-[]𝑛1t\in\left[n-1\right]italic_t ∈ [ italic_n - 1 ], if any, αt<αt+1subscript𝛼𝑡subscript𝛼𝑡1\alpha_{t}<\alpha_{t+1}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and

(2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ) for ϕF[n]italic-ϕ𝐹delimited-[]𝑛\phi\neq F\subseteq\left[n\right]italic_ϕ ≠ italic_F ⊆ [ italic_n ] minF=m𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑚minF=mitalic_m italic_i italic_n italic_F = italic_m , if γ=tFαt𝛾subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma=\cup_{t\in F}\alpha_{t}italic_γ = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , then tFatCmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}\in C_{m}^{*}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and for each i[k]𝑖delimited-[]𝑘i\in\left[k\right]italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] , tFat+vγ(i)Cmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝑖superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}+v_{\gamma}^{\left(i\right)}\in C_{m}^{*}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

For each γFU((αt)t=1n)𝛾𝐹𝑈superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑡𝑡1𝑛\gamma\in FU\left(\left(\alpha_{t}\right)_{t=1}^{n}\right)italic_γ ∈ italic_F italic_U ( ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and each i[k]𝑖delimited-[]𝑘i\in\left[k\right]italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ], let

(qβ(i,γ))β𝒫f()=(vγβ(i)vγ(i))β𝒫f(),β>αnsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑞𝛽𝑖𝛾𝛽subscript𝒫𝑓subscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝛽𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝑖formulae-sequence𝛽subscript𝒫𝑓𝛽subscript𝛼𝑛\left(q_{\beta}^{\left(i,\gamma\right)}\right)_{\beta\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(% \mathbb{N}\right)}=\left(v_{\gamma\cup\beta}^{\left(i\right)}-v_{\gamma}^{% \left(i\right)}\right)_{\beta\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right),\beta>% \alpha_{n}}( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_γ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ∪ italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) , italic_β > italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

By theorem 4.5 , the family,

{(qβ(i,γ))β𝒫f(),β>αn:i[k],γFU((αt)t=1n)}{(vβ(i))β𝒫f():i[k]}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑞𝛽𝑖𝛾formulae-sequence𝛽subscript𝒫𝑓𝛽subscript𝛼𝑛formulae-sequence𝑖delimited-[]𝑘𝛾𝐹𝑈superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑡𝑡1𝑛conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛽𝑖𝛽subscript𝒫𝑓𝑖delimited-[]𝑘\left\{\left(q_{\beta}^{\left(i,\gamma\right)}\right)_{\beta\in\mathcal{P}_{f}% \left(\mathbb{N}\right),\beta>\alpha_{n}}:i\in\left[k\right],\gamma\in FU\left% (\left(\alpha_{t}\right)_{t=1}^{n}\right)\right\}\cup\left\{\left(v_{\beta}^{% \left(i\right)}\right)_{\beta\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)}:i\in% \left[k\right]\right\}{ ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_γ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) , italic_β > italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] , italic_γ ∈ italic_F italic_U ( ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) } ∪ { ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } is an adequate set of VIP systems.

Let

={{a}{a+vα(i):i[k]}γFU((αt)t=1n){a+qα(i,γ):i[k]}:α𝒫f(),α<αn and aσ({vα(i):i[k]}{qα(i,γ):i[k],γFU((αt)t=1n)})}\mathcal{B}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{c}\left\{a\right\}\cup\left\{a+v_{\alpha}^{% \left(i\right)}:i\in\left[k\right]\right\}\cup\cup_{\gamma\in FU\left(\left(% \alpha_{t}\right)_{t=1}^{n}\right)}\left\{a+q_{\alpha}^{\left(i,\gamma\right)}% :i\in\left[k\right]\right\}\\ \begin{array}[]{c}:\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right),\alpha<% \alpha_{n}\text{\,}and\\ \text{ }a\in\sigma\left(\left\{v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}:i\in\left[k\right]% \right\}\cup\left\{q_{\alpha}^{\left(i,\gamma\right)}:i\in\left[k\right],% \gamma\in FU\left(\left(\alpha_{t}\right)_{t=1}^{n}\right)\right\}\right)\end{% array}\end{array}\right\}caligraphic_B = { start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL { italic_a } ∪ { italic_a + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } ∪ ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ∈ italic_F italic_U ( ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { italic_a + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_γ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL : italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) , italic_α < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_n italic_d end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_a ∈ italic_σ ( { italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } ∪ { italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_γ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] , italic_γ ∈ italic_F italic_U ( ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) } ) end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY }

Then by theorem 4.34.34.34.3, \mathcal{B}caligraphic_B is adequately partition regular

Let

D=Cn+1m=1n[{tHat+Cm:m=minH,ϕH[n]}{(tHat+vγ(i))+Cm:m=minH,ϕH[n],andγ=tHαt}]𝐷superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛1superscriptsubscript𝑚1𝑛delimited-[]conditional-setsubscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚formulae-sequence𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐻italic-ϕ𝐻delimited-[]𝑛:subscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝑖superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚absentformulae-sequenceformulae-sequence𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐻italic-ϕ𝐻delimited-[]𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝛾subscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝛼𝑡D=C_{n+1}^{*}\cap\bigcap_{m=1}^{n}\left[\begin{array}[]{c}\cap\left\{-\sum_{t% \in H}a_{t}+C_{m}^{*}:m=minH,\phi\neq H\subseteq\left[n\right]\right\}\bigcap% \\ \cap\left\{\begin{array}[]{c}-\left(\sum_{t\in H}a_{t}+v_{\gamma}^{\left(i% \right)}\right)+C_{m}^{*}:\\ m=minH,\phi\neq H\subseteq\left[n\right],and\gamma=\sum_{t\in H}\alpha_{t}\end% {array}\right\}\end{array}\right]italic_D = italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∩ ⋂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL ∩ { - ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_m = italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H , italic_ϕ ≠ italic_H ⊆ [ italic_n ] } ⋂ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ∩ { start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL - ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_m = italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H , italic_ϕ ≠ italic_H ⊆ [ italic_n ] , italic_a italic_n italic_d italic_γ = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY } end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY ]

Then Dp𝐷𝑝D\in pitalic_D ∈ italic_p and D𝐷Ditalic_D is piecewise syndetic. So by theorem 3.8, for some αn+1𝒫f()subscript𝛼𝑛1subscript𝒫𝑓\alpha_{n+1}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that αn+1>αnsubscript𝛼𝑛1subscript𝛼𝑛\alpha_{n+1}>\alpha_{n}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and some

an+1σ({vαn+1(i):i[k]}{qαn+1(i,γ):i[k]andγFU((αt)t=1n)})subscript𝑎𝑛1𝜎conditional-setsuperscriptsubscript𝑣subscript𝛼𝑛1𝑖𝑖delimited-[]𝑘conditional-setsuperscriptsubscript𝑞subscript𝛼𝑛1𝑖𝛾𝑖delimited-[]𝑘𝑎𝑛𝑑𝛾𝐹𝑈superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑡𝑡1𝑛a_{n+1}\in\sigma\left(\left\{v_{\alpha_{n+1}}^{\left(i\right)}:i\in\left[k% \right]\right\}\cup\left\{q_{\alpha_{n+1}}^{\left(i,\gamma\right)}:i\in\left[k% \right]and\gamma\in FU\left(\left(\alpha_{t}\right)_{t=1}^{n}\right)\right\}\right)italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_σ ( { italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } ∪ { italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_γ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] italic_a italic_n italic_d italic_γ ∈ italic_F italic_U ( ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) } )

such that

{an+1}{an+1+vαn+1(i):i[k]}γFU((αt)t=1n){an+1+qαn+1(i,γ):i[k]}D\left\{a_{n+1}\right\}\cup\left\{a_{n+1}+v_{\alpha_{n+1}}^{\left(i\right)}:i% \in\left[k\right]\right\}\cup\cup_{\gamma\in FU\left(\left(\alpha_{t}\right)_{% t=1}^{n}\right)}\left\{a_{n+1}+q_{\alpha_{n+1}}^{\left(i,\gamma\right)}:i\in% \left[k\right]\right\}\subseteq D{ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ∪ { italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } ∪ ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ∈ italic_F italic_U ( ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_γ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } ⊆ italic_D

By induction hypothesis (1)1\left(1\right)( 1 ) trivially holds. To verify (2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ), let ϕF[n+1]italic-ϕ𝐹delimited-[]𝑛1\phi\neq F\subseteq\left[n+1\right]italic_ϕ ≠ italic_F ⊆ [ italic_n + 1 ] and let γ=tFαt𝛾subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma=\cup_{t\in F}\alpha_{t}italic_γ = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . If n+1F,𝑛1𝐹n+1\notin F,italic_n + 1 ∉ italic_F , the condition holds by assumption. If F={n+1}𝐹𝑛1F=\left\{n+1\right\}italic_F = { italic_n + 1 }, then we have

{an+1}{an+1+vαn+1(i):i[k]}DCn+1subscript𝑎𝑛1conditional-setsubscript𝑎𝑛1superscriptsubscript𝑣subscript𝛼𝑛1𝑖𝑖delimited-[]𝑘𝐷superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛1\left\{a_{n+1}\right\}\cup\left\{a_{n+1}+v_{\alpha_{n+1}}^{\left(i\right)}:i% \in\left[k\right]\right\}\subseteq D\subseteq C_{n+1}^{*}{ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ∪ { italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } ⊆ italic_D ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

So, let assume {n+1}F𝑛1𝐹\left\{n+1\right\}\subsetneq F{ italic_n + 1 } ⊊ italic_F, let H=F𝐻𝐹H=Fitalic_H = italic_F \{n+1}𝑛1\left\{n+1\right\}{ italic_n + 1 }, and let μ=tFαt𝜇subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝛼𝑡\mu=\cup_{t\in F}\alpha_{t}italic_μ = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . Then an+1DtHat+Cmsubscript𝑎𝑛1𝐷subscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚a_{n+1}\in D\subseteq-\sum_{t\in H}a_{t}+C_{m}^{*}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_D ⊆ - ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where m=minH𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐻m=minHitalic_m = italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H .

Let γ=tHαt𝛾subscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma=\sum_{t\in H}\alpha_{t}italic_γ = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and let i[k]𝑖delimited-[]𝑘i\in\left[k\right]italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] . Then an+1+qαn+1(i,γ)D(tHat+vγ(i))+Cmsubscript𝑎𝑛1superscriptsubscript𝑞subscript𝛼𝑛1𝑖𝛾𝐷subscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝑖superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚a_{n+1}+q_{\alpha_{n+1}}^{\left(i,\gamma\right)}\in D\subseteq-\left(\sum_{t% \in H}a_{t}+v_{\gamma}^{\left(i\right)}\right)+C_{m}^{*}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_γ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_D ⊆ - ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , m=minH𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐻m=minHitalic_m = italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H

and so (tHat+vγ(i))+(an+1+qαn+1(i,γ))Cmsubscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝑖subscript𝑎𝑛1superscriptsubscript𝑞subscript𝛼𝑛1𝑖𝛾superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚\left(\sum_{t\in H}a_{t}+v_{\gamma}^{\left(i\right)}\right)+\left(a_{n+1}+q_{% \alpha_{n+1}}^{\left(i,\gamma\right)}\right)\in C_{m}^{*}( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + ( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_γ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . That is

tFat+vμ(i)=(tHat+an+1)+(vγ(i)+qαn+1(i,γ))CmCmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑣𝜇𝑖subscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝑎𝑡subscript𝑎𝑛1superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑞subscript𝛼𝑛1𝑖𝛾superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚subscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}+v_{\mu}^{\left(i\right)}=\left(\sum_{t\in H}a_{t}+a_{n+1}% \right)+\left(v_{\gamma}^{\left(i\right)}+q_{\alpha_{n+1}}^{\left(i,\gamma% \right)}\right)\in C_{m}^{*}\subseteq C_{m}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i , italic_γ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
Theorem 4.7.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative adequate partial semigroup and let (Cn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑛1\left(C_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTbe sequence of central sets where CnSsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑆C_{n}\subseteq Sitalic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_S. Suppose that

{(vα(i))α𝒫f():i[k]}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓𝑖delimited-[]𝑘\left\{\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right)}:i\in\left[k\right]\right\}{ ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] }

is an adequate set of VIP systems. Then there exists an IP ring (1)superscript1\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and an IP system (bα)α(1)subscriptsubscript𝑏𝛼𝛼superscript1\left(b_{\alpha}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)}}( italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in S𝑆Sitalic_S such that (1)=FU((αn)n=1)superscript1𝐹𝑈superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)}=FU\left(\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}\right)caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_F italic_U ( ( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) where (αn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a sequence of members of 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that maxαn<minαn+1𝑚𝑎𝑥subscript𝛼𝑛𝑚𝑖𝑛subscript𝛼𝑛1max\alpha_{n}<min\alpha_{n+1}italic_m italic_a italic_x italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTfor all n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N and for all α(1)𝛼superscript1\alpha\in\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)}italic_α ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where α=tFαt𝛼subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝛼𝑡\alpha=\cup_{t\in F}\alpha_{t}italic_α = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) and minF=m𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑚minF=mitalic_m italic_i italic_n italic_F = italic_m, {bα,bα+vα(i),,bα+vα(k)}Cmsubscript𝑏𝛼subscript𝑏𝛼superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖subscript𝑏𝛼superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑘subscript𝐶𝑚\left\{b_{\alpha},b_{\alpha}+v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)},...,b_{\alpha}+v_{% \alpha}^{\left(k\right)}\right\}\subseteq C_{m}{ italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , … , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_k ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT } ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Proof.

Choose (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (αn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTas in theorem 4.6. Put bα=tFatsubscript𝑏𝛼subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡b_{\alpha}=\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. ∎

Theorem 4.8.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative adequate partial semigroup and let CnSsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑆C_{n}\subseteq Sitalic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_S, n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N be central sets. Suppose that {(vα(i))α𝒫f():i[k]}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓𝑖delimited-[]𝑘\left\{\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right)}:i\in\left[k\right]\right\}{ ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } is an adequate set of VIP systems. Then there exists sequences (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin S𝑆Sitalic_S and (αn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that αn<αn+1subscript𝛼𝑛subscript𝛼𝑛1\alpha_{n}<\alpha_{n+1}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛nitalic_n and such that for every F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ), tFatCmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡subscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}\in C_{m}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT where m=min𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑛m=minitalic_m = italic_m italic_i italic_nF and if β1<β2<<βssubscript𝛽1subscript𝛽2subscript𝛽𝑠\beta_{1}<\beta_{2}<...<\beta_{s}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < … < italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where each βjFsubscript𝛽𝑗𝐹\beta_{j}\subseteq Fitalic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_F and i1,i2,,is{1,2,,k}subscript𝑖1subscript𝑖2subscript𝑖𝑠12𝑘i_{1},i_{2},...,i_{s}\in\left\{1,2,...,k\right\}italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_k } then writing γj=tβjαtsubscript𝛾𝑗subscript𝑡subscript𝛽𝑗subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma_{j}=\cup_{t\in\beta_{j}}\alpha_{t}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for j{1,2,,s}𝑗12𝑠j\in\left\{1,2,...,s\right\}italic_j ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_s }we have tFat+j=1svγj(ij)Cmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑣subscript𝛾𝑗subscript𝑖𝑗subscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}+\sum_{j=1}^{s}v_{\gamma_{j}}^{\left(i_{j}\right)}\in C_{m}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Proof.

To prove we will modify the induction hypothesis (2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ) of the proof of theorem 3.11 by (2)2\left(2\right)( 2 ) for ϕF[n]italic-ϕ𝐹delimited-[]𝑛\phi\neq F\subseteq\left[n\right]italic_ϕ ≠ italic_F ⊆ [ italic_n ], minF=m𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑚minF=mitalic_m italic_i italic_n italic_F = italic_m ,tFatCmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}\in C_{m}^{*}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and if β1<β2<<βssubscript𝛽1subscript𝛽2subscript𝛽𝑠\beta_{1}<\beta_{2}<...<\beta_{s}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < … < italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where each βjFsubscript𝛽𝑗𝐹\beta_{j}\subseteq Fitalic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_F and i1,i2,,is[k]subscript𝑖1subscript𝑖2subscript𝑖𝑠delimited-[]𝑘i_{1},i_{2},...,i_{s}\in\left[k\right]italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ [ italic_k ] and for j{1,2,,s}𝑗12𝑠j\in\left\{1,2,...,s\right\}italic_j ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_s }γj=tβjαtsubscript𝛾𝑗subscript𝑡subscript𝛽𝑗subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma_{j}=\cup_{t\in\beta_{j}}\alpha_{t}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT then tFat+j=1svγj(ij)Cmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑣subscript𝛾𝑗subscript𝑖𝑗superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}+\sum_{j=1}^{s}v_{\gamma_{j}}^{\left(i_{j}\right)}\in C_{m}^% {*}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. We have to change the set D𝐷Ditalic_D in the proof of theorem 3.11 by

D=Cn+1m=1n[{tHat+Cm:ϕH[n],minH=m}{(tHat+j=1svγj(ij))+Cm:ϕH[n],minH=m,s,β1<β2<<βs,j=1sβjH and forj[s],γj=tβjαt}]𝐷superscriptsubscript𝑚1𝑛superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑛1delimited-[]conditional-setsubscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚formulae-sequenceitalic-ϕ𝐻delimited-[]𝑛𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐻𝑚:subscript𝑡𝐻subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑣subscript𝛾𝑗subscript𝑖𝑗superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑚absentformulae-sequenceitalic-ϕ𝐻delimited-[]𝑛formulae-sequence𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐻𝑚formulae-sequence𝑠subscript𝛽1subscript𝛽2subscript𝛽𝑠formulae-sequencesuperscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑠subscript𝛽𝑗𝐻 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑗delimited-[]𝑠subscript𝛾𝑗subscript𝑡subscript𝛽𝑗subscript𝛼𝑡D=C_{n+1}^{*}\bigcap\cap_{m=1}^{n}\left[\begin{array}[]{c}\cap\left\{-\sum_{t% \in H}a_{t}+C_{m}^{*}:\phi\neq H\subseteq\left[n\right],minH=m\right\}\bigcap% \\ \left\{\begin{array}[]{c}-\left(\sum_{t\in H}a_{t}+\sum_{j=1}^{s}v_{\gamma_{j}% }^{\left(i_{j}\right)}\right)+C_{m}^{*}:\\ \begin{array}[]{c}\phi\neq H\subseteq\left[n\right],minH=m,s\in\mathbb{N},% \beta_{1}<\beta_{2}<...<\beta_{s},\\ \cup_{j=1}^{s}\beta_{j}\subseteq H\text{ }and\text{ }forj\in\left[s\right],% \gamma_{j}=\cup_{t\in\beta_{j}}\alpha_{t}\end{array}\end{array}\right\}\end{% array}\right]italic_D = italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⋂ ∩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL ∩ { - ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_ϕ ≠ italic_H ⊆ [ italic_n ] , italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H = italic_m } ⋂ end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL { start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL - ( ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL italic_ϕ ≠ italic_H ⊆ [ italic_n ] , italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_H = italic_m , italic_s ∈ blackboard_N , italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < … < italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_H italic_a italic_n italic_d italic_f italic_o italic_r italic_j ∈ [ italic_s ] , italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY } end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY ]

rest of the proof is quite similar to the proof of theorem 3.11 so we skip that part. Here we speak few words about weak VIP systems. If S𝑆Sitalic_S be a commutative and cancellative semigroup then S𝑆Sitalic_S can be embedded in a group this group is called group of quotients. ∎

Definition 4.9.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative cancellative semigroup and let G𝐺Gitalic_G be the group of quotients of S𝑆Sitalic_S. A sequence (vα)α𝒫f()subscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓\left(v_{\alpha}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)}( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in S𝑆Sitalic_S is called a weak VIP systems if it is a VIP system in G.𝐺G.italic_G .

Corollary 4.10.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative cancellative semigroup and let CnSsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑆C_{n}\subseteq Sitalic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_S, n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N be central sets, and let {(vα(i))α𝒫f():i[k]}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓𝑖delimited-[]𝑘\left\{\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right)}:i\in\left[k\right]\right\}{ ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } be a set of weak VIP systems in S. Then there exists sequences (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin S𝑆Sitalic_S and (αn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that αn<αn+1subscript𝛼𝑛subscript𝛼𝑛1\alpha_{n}<\alpha_{n+1}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛nitalic_n and such that for every F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) and every i[k]𝑖delimited-[]𝑘i\in\left[k\right]italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ], if γ=tFαt𝛾subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma=\cup_{t\in F}\alpha_{t}italic_γ = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, then tFat+vγ(i)Cmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝑖subscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}+v_{\gamma}^{\left(i\right)}\in C_{m}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ,where m=minF𝑚𝐹m=\min Fitalic_m = roman_min italic_F .

Proof.

Let G𝐺Gitalic_G be the group of quotients of S.𝑆S.italic_S .Then, with substraction in G𝐺Gitalic_G, we have G={ab:a,bS}𝐺conditional-set𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑆G=\left\{a-b:a,b\in S\right\}italic_G = { italic_a - italic_b : italic_a , italic_b ∈ italic_S }. We claim that S𝑆Sitalic_S is piecewise syndetic in G.𝐺G.italic_G . That is there exists H𝒫f(G)𝐻subscript𝒫𝑓𝐺H\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(G\right)italic_H ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_G ) such that for each F𝒫f(G)𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓𝐺F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(G\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_G ), there exists xG𝑥𝐺x\in Gitalic_x ∈ italic_G such that F+xtH(t+S)𝐹𝑥subscript𝑡𝐻𝑡𝑆F+x\subseteq\cup_{t\in H}\left(-t+S\right)italic_F + italic_x ⊆ ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( - italic_t + italic_S ). Indeed , let H={0}𝐻0H=\left\{0\right\}italic_H = { 0 } and let F𝒫f(G)𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓𝐺F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(G\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_G ) be given. Pick l𝑙l\in\mathbb{N}italic_l ∈ blackboard_N and

a1,a2,,al,b1,b2,,blsubscript𝑎1subscript𝑎2subscript𝑎𝑙subscript𝑏1subscript𝑏2subscript𝑏𝑙a_{1},a_{2},...,a_{l},b_{1},b_{2},...,b_{l}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT

in S𝑆Sitalic_S such that F={aibi:i[l]}𝐹conditional-setsubscript𝑎𝑖subscript𝑏𝑖𝑖delimited-[]𝑙F=\left\{a_{i}-b_{i}:i\in\left[l\right]\right\}italic_F = { italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_l ] }. Let x=i=1lbi𝑥superscriptsubscript𝑖1𝑙subscript𝑏𝑖x=\sum_{i=1}^{l}b_{i}italic_x = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Then F+xS=0+S.𝐹𝑥𝑆0𝑆F+x\subseteq S=-0+S.italic_F + italic_x ⊆ italic_S = - 0 + italic_S . Since S𝑆Sitalic_S is piecewise syndetic, S¯K(βG)ϕ¯𝑆𝐾𝛽𝐺italic-ϕ\overline{S}\cap K\left(\beta G\right)\neq\phiover¯ start_ARG italic_S end_ARG ∩ italic_K ( italic_β italic_G ) ≠ italic_ϕ by [[5],Theorem 4.40]delimited-[]5𝑇𝑒𝑜rem 4.40\left[\left[5\right],Theo\text{rem }4.40\right][ [ 5 ] , italic_T italic_h italic_e italic_o rem 4.40 ] and consequently K(βS)=S¯K(βG)𝐾𝛽𝑆¯𝑆𝐾𝛽𝐺K\left(\beta S\right)=\overline{S}\cap K\left(\beta G\right)italic_K ( italic_β italic_S ) = over¯ start_ARG italic_S end_ARG ∩ italic_K ( italic_β italic_G ) by [[5],Theorem 1.65]delimited-[]5𝑇𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 1.65\left[\text{$\left[5\right]$},Theorem\text{ }1.65\right][ [ 5 ] , italic_T italic_h italic_e italic_o italic_r italic_e italic_m 1.65 ]. Since Cnsubscript𝐶𝑛C_{n}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are central in S, by definition there is some idempotent pK(βS)𝑝𝐾𝛽𝑆p\in K\left(\beta S\right)italic_p ∈ italic_K ( italic_β italic_S ) such that CnP.subscript𝐶𝑛𝑃C_{n}\in P.italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_P . But then pK(βG)𝑝𝐾𝛽𝐺p\in K\left(\beta G\right)italic_p ∈ italic_K ( italic_β italic_G ) and thus Cnsubscript𝐶𝑛C_{n}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are central in G. Also, for each i[k]𝑖delimited-[]𝑘i\in\left[k\right]italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ], (vα(i))α𝒫f()subscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(% \mathbb{N}\right)}( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a weak VIP system in S𝑆Sitalic_S and is therefore a VIP system in G𝐺Gitalic_G. Thus, {(vα(i))α𝒫f():i[k]}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓𝑖delimited-[]𝑘\left\{\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right)}:i\in\left[k\right]\right\}{ ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } is an adequate set of VIP systems in G𝐺Gitalic_G so by theorem3.11, there exists sequences (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin G and (αn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that αn<αn+1subscript𝛼𝑛subscript𝛼𝑛1\alpha_{n}<\alpha_{n+1}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛nitalic_n and such that for every F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ), if γ=tFαt𝛾subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma=\cup_{t\in F}\alpha_{t}italic_γ = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, then {tFat}{tFat+vγ(i):i[k]}Cm.subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡conditional-setsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑣𝛾𝑖𝑖delimited-[]𝑘subscript𝐶𝑚\left\{\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}\right\}\cup\left\{\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}+v_{\gamma}^{% \left(i\right)}:i\in\left[k\right]\right\}\subseteq C_{m}.{ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ∪ { ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . In particular, each atsubscript𝑎𝑡a_{t}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is in CmSsubscript𝐶𝑚𝑆C_{m}\subseteq Sitalic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_S so (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a sequence in S as required. ∎

Here we present the “VIP-Free” version of Theorem 4.6 and a similar proof.

Theorem 4.11.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative adequate partial semigroup and let U𝑈Uitalic_U be a set, and for each sU𝑠𝑈s\in Uitalic_s ∈ italic_U, let Tssubscript𝑇𝑠T_{s}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT be a set. For each sU𝑠𝑈s\in Uitalic_s ∈ italic_U and each tTs𝑡subscript𝑇𝑠t\in T_{s}italic_t ∈ italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, let As,t𝒫f(S),subscript𝐴𝑠𝑡subscript𝒫𝑓𝑆A_{s,t}\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(S\right),italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_S ) ,such that the family 𝒜s={As,t:tTs}subscript𝒜𝑠conditional-setsubscript𝐴𝑠𝑡𝑡subscript𝑇𝑠\mathcal{A}_{s}=\left\{A_{s,t}:t\in T_{s}\right\}caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = { italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s , italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_t ∈ italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } is shift invariant and adequately partition regular. Let s1Usubscript𝑠1𝑈s_{1}\in Uitalic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_U and suppose ϕ:sU({s}×Ts)U:italic-ϕsubscript𝑠𝑈𝑠subscript𝑇𝑠𝑈\phi:\cup_{s\in U}\left(\left\{s\right\}\times T_{s}\right)\to Uitalic_ϕ : ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s ∈ italic_U end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( { italic_s } × italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) → italic_U is a function. If CnS,nformulae-sequencesubscript𝐶𝑛𝑆𝑛C_{n}\in S,n\in\mathbb{N}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_S , italic_n ∈ blackboard_N is a sequence of central set then there exists sequences (sn)n=2superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑠𝑛𝑛2\left(s_{n}\right)_{n=2}^{\infty}( italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in U𝑈Uitalic_U and (tn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑡𝑛𝑛1\left(t_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with each tnTsnsubscript𝑡𝑛subscript𝑇subscript𝑠𝑛t_{n}\in T_{s_{n}}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT such that

ϕ(sn1,tn1)=snitalic-ϕsubscript𝑠𝑛1subscript𝑡𝑛1subscript𝑠𝑛\phi\left(s_{n-1},t_{n-1}\right)=s_{n}italic_ϕ ( italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for n2𝑛2n\geq 2italic_n ≥ 2 and such that if n1<n2<<nmsubscript𝑛1subscript𝑛2subscript𝑛𝑚n_{1}<n_{2}<...<n_{m}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < … < italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and for each i{1,2,,m},xniAsni,tniformulae-sequence𝑖12𝑚subscript𝑥subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝐴subscript𝑠subscript𝑛𝑖subscript𝑡subscript𝑛𝑖i\in\left\{1,2,...,m\right\},x_{n_{i}}\in A_{s_{n_{i}},t_{n_{i}}}italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_m } , italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, then

(xn1+xn2++xnm)Cn1(the sum is defined).subscript𝑥subscript𝑛1subscript𝑥subscript𝑛2subscript𝑥subscript𝑛𝑚subscript𝐶subscript𝑛1the sum is defined\left(x_{n_{1}}+x_{n_{2}}+...+x_{n_{m}}\right)\in C_{n_{1}}\left(\text{the sum% is defined}\right).( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + … + italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( the sum is defined ) .
Proof.

The proof of Theorem 4.6 is modified. Having choosen (si)i=1nsuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑠𝑖𝑖1𝑛\left(s_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{n}( italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (ti)i=1n1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑡𝑖𝑖1𝑛1\left(t_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{n-1}( italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, replace the adequately partition regular family \mathcal{B}caligraphic_B constructed in the proof of Theorem 4.6 by 𝒜snsubscript𝒜subscript𝑠𝑛\mathcal{A}_{s_{n}}caligraphic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and replace the piecewise syndetic set D𝐷Ditalic_D by

D^=Cn+1[{(xn1+xn2++xnm)+Cn1:n1<n2<<nm<n and each xniAsni,tni}]\hat{D}=C_{n+1}^{*}\cap\cap\left[\left\{\begin{array}[]{c}-\left(x_{n_{1}}+x_{% n_{2}}+...+x_{n_{m}}\right)+C_{n_{1}}^{*}:\\ n_{1}<n_{2}<...<n_{m}<n\text{ and each $x_{n_{i}}\in A_{s_{n_{i}},t_{n_{i}}}$}% \end{array}\right\}\right]over^ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG = italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∩ ∩ [ { start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL - ( italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + … + italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT : end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < … < italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_n and each italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY } ]

Then one chooses tnsubscript𝑡𝑛t_{n}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT so that Asn,tnD^subscript𝐴subscript𝑠𝑛subscript𝑡𝑛^𝐷A_{s_{n},t_{n}}\subseteq\hat{D}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ over^ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG and let sn+1=ϕ(sn,tn)subscript𝑠𝑛1italic-ϕsubscript𝑠𝑛subscript𝑡𝑛s_{n+1}=\phi\left(s_{n},t_{n}\right)italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ϕ ( italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )

5. APPLICATION

Here we briefly discuss about the application of Theorem 4.6.4.64.6.4.6 .

Theorem 5.1.

Let (S,+)𝑆\left(S,+\right)( italic_S , + ) be a commutative semigroup and let CnSsubscript𝐶𝑛𝑆C_{n}\subseteq Sitalic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_S, n𝑛n\in\mathbb{N}italic_n ∈ blackboard_N be central sets. Suppose that {(vα(i))α𝒫f():i[k]}conditional-setsubscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑣𝛼𝑖𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓𝑖delimited-[]𝑘\left\{\left(v_{\alpha}^{\left(i\right)}\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left% (\mathbb{N}\right)}:i\in\left[k\right]\right\}{ ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_i ∈ [ italic_k ] } is a set of IP systems. Then there exists sequences (an)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑛𝑛1\left(a_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTin S𝑆Sitalic_S and (αn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f()subscript𝒫𝑓\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) such that αn<αn+1subscript𝛼𝑛subscript𝛼𝑛1\alpha_{n}<\alpha_{n+1}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛nitalic_n and such that for every F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ), tFatCmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡subscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}\in C_{m}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT where m=min𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑛m=minitalic_m = italic_m italic_i italic_nF and if β1<β2<<βssubscript𝛽1subscript𝛽2subscript𝛽𝑠\beta_{1}<\beta_{2}<...<\beta_{s}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < … < italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where each βjFsubscript𝛽𝑗𝐹\beta_{j}\subseteq Fitalic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ italic_F and i1,i2,,is{1,2,,k}subscript𝑖1subscript𝑖2subscript𝑖𝑠12𝑘i_{1},i_{2},...,i_{s}\in\left\{1,2,...,k\right\}italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_k } then writing γj=tβjαtsubscript𝛾𝑗subscript𝑡subscript𝛽𝑗subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma_{j}=\cup_{t\in\beta_{j}}\alpha_{t}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for j{1,2,,s}𝑗12𝑠j\in\left\{1,2,...,s\right\}italic_j ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_s } we have tFat+j=1svγj(ij)Cmsubscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝑎𝑡superscriptsubscript𝑗1𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑣subscript𝛾𝑗subscript𝑖𝑗subscript𝐶𝑚\sum_{t\in F}a_{t}+\sum_{j=1}^{s}v_{\gamma_{j}}^{\left(i_{j}\right)}\in C_{m}∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_i start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Proof.

In a commutative semigroup any set of IP system is an adequate set of VIP system, so theorem 4.84.84.84.8 applies. ∎

Definition 5.2.

Let l𝑙l\in\mathbb{N}italic_l ∈ blackboard_N , a set-monomial (over l)over superscript𝑙\left(\text{over }\mathbb{N}^{l}\right)( over blackboard_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) in the variable X𝑋Xitalic_X is an expression m(X)=S1×S2××Sl𝑚𝑋subscript𝑆1subscript𝑆2subscript𝑆𝑙m\left(X\right)=S_{1}\times S_{2}\times\ldots\times S_{l}italic_m ( italic_X ) = italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × … × italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , where for each i{1,2,,l}𝑖12𝑙i\in\left\{1,2,\ldots,l\right\}italic_i ∈ { 1 , 2 , … , italic_l }, Sisubscript𝑆𝑖S_{i}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is either the symbol X𝑋Xitalic_X or a nonempty singleton subset of \mathbb{N}blackboard_N (these are called coordinate coefficients). The degree of the monomial is the number of times the symbol X𝑋Xitalic_X appears in the list S1,,Slsubscript𝑆1subscript𝑆𝑙S_{1},\ldots,S_{l}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , … , italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. For example, taking l=3𝑙3l=3italic_l = 3, m(X)={5}×X×X𝑚𝑋5𝑋𝑋m\left(X\right)=\left\{5\right\}\times X\times Xitalic_m ( italic_X ) = { 5 } × italic_X × italic_X is a set-monomial of degree 2, while m(X)=X×{17}×{2}𝑚𝑋𝑋172m\left(X\right)=X\times\left\{17\right\}\times\left\{2\right\}italic_m ( italic_X ) = italic_X × { 17 } × { 2 } is a set-monomial of degree 1. A set-polynomial is an expression of the form p(X)=m1(X)m2(X)mk(X)𝑝𝑋subscript𝑚1𝑋subscript𝑚2𝑋subscript𝑚𝑘𝑋p\left(X\right)=m_{1}\left(X\right)\cup m_{2}\left(X\right)\cup\ldots\cup m_{k% }\left(X\right)italic_p ( italic_X ) = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X ) ∪ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X ) ∪ … ∪ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X ), where k𝑘k\in\mathbb{N}italic_k ∈ blackboard_N and m1(X)m2(X)mk(X)subscript𝑚1𝑋subscript𝑚2𝑋subscript𝑚𝑘𝑋m_{1}\left(X\right)\cup m_{2}\left(X\right)\cup\ldots\cup m_{k}\left(X\right)italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X ) ∪ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X ) ∪ … ∪ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_X ) are set-monomials. The degree of a set-polynomial is the largest degree of its set-monomial “summands” , and its constant term consists of the “sum” of those misubscript𝑚𝑖m_{i}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT that are constant, i.e., of degree zero.

Lemma 5.3.

Let l𝑙l\in\mathbb{N}italic_l ∈ blackboard_N and let 𝒫𝒫\mathcal{P}caligraphic_P be a finite family of set polynomial over

(𝒫f(l),+)subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑙\left(\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}^{l}\right),+\right)( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , + )

whose constant terms are empty. Then there exists q𝑞q\in\mathbb{N}italic_q ∈ blackboard_N and an IP ring (1)={α𝒫f():minα>q}superscript1conditional-set𝛼subscript𝒫𝑓𝑚𝑖𝑛𝛼𝑞\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)}=\left\{\alpha\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}% \right):min\alpha>q\right\}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = { italic_α ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ) : italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_α > italic_q } such that {(P(α))α(1):P(X)𝒫}conditional-setsubscript𝑃𝛼𝛼superscript1𝑃𝑋𝒫\left\{\left(P\left(\alpha\right)\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)% }}:P\left(X\right)\in\mathcal{P}\right\}{ ( italic_P ( italic_α ) ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_P ( italic_X ) ∈ caligraphic_P } is an adequate set of VIP systems.

Proof.

[HM], Lemma 4.3 ∎

Theorem 5.4.

Let l𝑙l\in\mathbb{N}italic_l ∈ blackboard_N and let 𝒫𝒫\mathcal{P}caligraphic_P be a finite family of set polynomial over (𝒫f(l),+)subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑙\left(\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}^{l}\right),+\right)( caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , + ) whose constant terms are empty. If Cn𝒫f(l),nformulae-sequencesubscript𝐶𝑛subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑙𝑛C_{n}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}^{l}\right),n\in\mathbb{N}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊆ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , italic_n ∈ blackboard_N are central sets then there exists sequences (An)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐴𝑛𝑛1\left(A_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 𝒫f(l)subscript𝒫𝑓superscript𝑙\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}^{l}\right)caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and (αn)n=1superscriptsubscriptsubscript𝛼𝑛𝑛1\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty}( italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTsuch that αn<αn+1subscript𝛼𝑛subscript𝛼𝑛1\alpha_{n}<\alpha_{n+1}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for each n𝑛nitalic_n and such that for every F𝒫f()𝐹subscript𝒫𝑓F\in\mathcal{P}_{f}\left(\mathbb{N}\right)italic_F ∈ caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( blackboard_N ). We have {Aγ}{Aγ+P(γ):P𝒫}Cmsubscript𝐴𝛾conditional-setsubscript𝐴𝛾𝑃𝛾𝑃𝒫subscript𝐶𝑚\left\{A_{\gamma}\right\}\cup\left\{A_{\gamma}+P\left(\gamma\right):P\in% \mathcal{P}\right\}\subseteq C_{m}{ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } ∪ { italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_P ( italic_γ ) : italic_P ∈ caligraphic_P } ⊆ italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where m=minF𝑚𝑚𝑖𝑛𝐹m=minFitalic_m = italic_m italic_i italic_n italic_F,γ=tFαt𝛾subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝛼𝑡\gamma=\cup_{t\in F}\alpha_{t}italic_γ = ∪ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Aγ=tFAtsubscript𝐴𝛾subscript𝑡𝐹subscript𝐴𝑡A_{\gamma}=\sum_{t\in F}A_{t}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t ∈ italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Proof.

By lemma 5.35.35.35.3 there is an IP ring (1)superscript1\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT such that {(P(α))α(1):P(X)𝒫}conditional-setsubscript𝑃𝛼𝛼superscript1𝑃𝑋𝒫\left\{\left(P\left(\alpha\right)\right)_{\alpha\in\mathcal{F}^{\left(1\right)% }}:P\left(X\right)\in\mathcal{P}\right\}{ ( italic_P ( italic_α ) ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α ∈ caligraphic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT : italic_P ( italic_X ) ∈ caligraphic_P } is an adequate set of VIP systems. Thus Theorem 4.6 applies. ∎

Acknowledgment: The first author acknowledge the Grant CSIR-UGC NET fellowship with file No. 09/106(0202)/2020-EMR-I. The second author acknowledge the support from University Research Scholarship of University of Kalyani with id-1F-7/URS/Mathematics/2023/S-502. They also grateful to their supervisor Prof. Dibyendu De for his valuable suggestions.

References

  • [BH] V. Bergelson, N. Hindman, Ramsey theory in noncommutative semigroups, Transl. Am. Math. Soc. 330 (1992) 433–446.
  • [DHS] D. De, N. Hindman, D. Strauss, A new and stronger central set sets theorem, Fundam. Math. 199(2008)1551751992008155175199\left(2008\right)155-175199 ( 2008 ) 155 - 175.
  • [F] H. Furstenberg: Recurrence in Ergodic Theory and Combinatorial Number Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1981.
  • [G] A. Ghosh, A generalised central sets theorem in partial semigroups, Semigroup Forum 100 (1), 169-179.
  • [HM] N. Hindman, R. McCutcheon, VIP systems in Partial Semigroups, Discrete Math. 240(2001),4570.24020014570240\left(2001\right),45-70.240 ( 2001 ) , 45 - 70 .
  • [HP] N. Hindman, K. Pleasant, Central sets theorem for arbitrary adequate partial semigroups, Topology Proceedings 58(2021),183206.58202118320658\left(2021\right),183-206.58 ( 2021 ) , 183 - 206 .
  • [HS] N. Hindman,D. Strauss, Algebra in the Stone-Cech Compactification: Theory and Applications, 2nd edition, de Gruyter Berlin, 2012.
  • [M] J. Mcleod, Central sets in commutative adequate partial semigroups,Topology Proceedings 29(2005),567576.29200556757629\left(2005\right),567-576.29 ( 2005 ) , 567 - 576 .
  • [P] D. Phulara, A generalize central sets theorem and applications, Topology and its applications 196(2015)92105196201592105196\left(2015\right)92-105196 ( 2015 ) 92 - 105.
  • [Pl] K. Pleasant, When Ramsey Meets Stone-Čech : Some New Results in Ramsey Theory. Ph.D. dissertation. Howard University (Washington, D.C.). 2017.