RIS: Regularized Imaging Spectroscopy

for STIX on-board Solar Orbiter

Anna Volpara1, Alessandro Lupoli2, Frank Filbir2,3, Emma Perracchione4, Anna Maria Massone1, and Michele Piana1,5

1 MIDA, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 35 16146 Genova, Italy
email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
2 Department of Mathematics, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstraße 3 85748 Garching b. München
email: frank__\__[email protected], [email protected]
3 Bioengineering Center, Institute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
4 Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche ”Giuseppe Luigi Lagrange”, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24 10129 Torino, Italy
email: [email protected]
5 Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, via Osservatorio 20 10025 Pino Torinese Italy

Abstract

Imaging spectroscopy, i.e., the generation of spatially resolved count spectra and of cubes of count maps at different energies, is one of the main goals of solar hard X-ray missions based on Fourier imaging. For these telescopes, so far imaging spectroscopy has been realized via the generation of either count maps independently reconstructed at the different energy channels, or electron flux maps reconstructed via deconvolution of approximate forms of the bremsstrahlung cross-section.

Our aim is to introduce the Regularized Imaging Spectroscopy method (RIS), in which regularization implemented in the count space imposes a smoothing constraint across contiguous energy channels, without the need to compute any de-convolution of the bremsstrahlung effect.

STIX records imaging data computing visibilities in the spatial frequency domain. Our RIS is a sequential scheme in which part of the information coded in the image reconstructed at a specific energy channel is transferred to the reconstruction process at a contiguous channel via visibility interpolation computed by means of Variably Scaled Kernels.

In the case of STIX visibilities recorded during the November 11, 2022 flaring event, we show that RIS is able to generate hard X-ray maps whose morphology smoothly evolves from one energy channel to the contiguous one, and that, accordingly, from these maps it is possible to infer spatially-resolved count spectra characterized by notable numerical stability. We also show that the performances of this approach are rather robust with respect to both the image reconstruction method and the count energy channel utilized to trigger the sequential process.

We conclude that RIS is appropriate to construct image cubes from STIX visibilities that are characterized by a smooth behavior across count energies, thus allowing the generation of numerically stable (and, thus, physically reliable) local count spectra.

key words. Techniques: imaging spectroscopy; Sun: X-rays, gamma rays; Sun: flares; Methods: numerical

1 Introduction

Imaging spectroscopy in solar hard X-ray imaging (Piana et al. 2022) consists in providing, on the one hand, reconstructions of hard X-ray count maps at different count energy channels and, on the other hand, spatially-resolved count spectra. From a scientific viewpoint, imaging spectroscopy allows inferring information about the characteristics of the location of the acceleration region (Battaglia & Benz 2006; Xu et al. 2008; Martínez Oliveros et al. 2011; Guo et al. 2012) and even studying the physics of electron transport within the source (Petrosian & Chen 2010; Volpara et al. 2024).

In the last decades, imaging spectroscopy has been one of the main science goals of space missions that have been designed to generate measurements representing samples of the Fourier transform of the incoming radiation flux, named visibilities, for energy values in the range between a few keV and some tenths of keV (Lin et al. 2002; Hurford et al. 2002; Krucker et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2019; Massa et al. 2023). In the case of these Fourier-based imagers, the traditional approach to imaging spectroscopy applies Fourier inversion methods to sets of visibilities, to obtain spatial images at different count energies (Battaglia & Benz 2006; Xu et al. 2008; Martínez Oliveros et al. 2011). This approach is simple, but not optimal. Indeed, each image is reconstructed using a visibility set that is completely independent of those used to make images in adjacent energy bins, which implies that reconstructions corresponding to adjacent count energy bins are uncorrelated and may present substantial differences from each other. Therefore, stacking these images leads to nonphysical fluctuations in the spatially resolved count spectra, which makes their interpretation problematic.

To address this issue, a more sophisticated method has been developed within the RHESSI and STIX frameworks, in which the observed visibility spectra obtained at points in the spatial frequency domain were inverted by means of a regularization method providing electron flux visibility spectra smoothed along the electron energy direction (Piana et al. 2007; Prato et al. 2009; Volpara et al. 2024). These latter ones can be utilized to both reconstruct electron flux images and, once projected back to the count space, regularized count spectra. By construction, these spectra vary smoothly along the count energy direction. However, the main weakness of this approach is in its computational complexity. In fact, in this case spatially resolved regularized count spectra are obtained by first inverting the original experimental visibility spectra, which is an intrinsically ill-posed problem (Bertero et al. 2021); further, to do so, a specific model for the bremsstrahlung cross-section must be assumed, which requires an approximation of the electron-ion interaction process (Koch & Motz 1959); finally, the regularized count spectra are obtained by means of a back-projection onto the count space, which requires the use of numerical integration (Volpara et al. 2024).

The objective of the present paper is to introduce an approach to imaging spectroscopy for visibility-based hard X-ray telescopes that addresses the two previous limitations; i.e., this approach aims to introduce a regularization constraint across the count energies without any spectral inversion process, and therefore without the need to previously construct any electron flux maps. The starting point of the Regularized Imaging Spectroscopy method (RIS) is an interpolation/extrapolation method based on the use of Variably Scaled Kernels (VSKs), which allow an advanced approach to numerical approximation where a priori information can be easily plugged into the interpolation process by means of appropriate scale functions (Bozzini et al. 2015). In the case of both RHESSI and STIX, VSKs proved to be very effective in interpolating visibilities in the frequency plane, while a non-linear iterative scheme (Piana & Bertero 1997) applied to the interpolated visibility surface was able to provide physically reliable reconstructions of the flaring source (Perracchione et al. 2021a).

In the present context we decided to use VSKs and iterative image reconstruction as the computational engine of a regularized imaging spectroscopy approach that can be formulated according to the following scheme:

  1. 1.

    Given a visibility set at a starting triggering count energy channel ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, apply any visibility-based image reconstruction method to obtain the corresponding triggering map.

  2. 2.

    Apply Fourier transform to compute the scale function corresponding to the reconstruction obtained in the previous step.

  3. 3.

    Given the visibility set in an energy channel ϵ1subscriptitalic-ϵ1\epsilon_{1}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT adjacent to ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, apply VSK with the scale function obtained in the previous step to realize interpolation in the spatial frequency plane.

  4. 4.

    Apply the constrained iterative method in order to obtain the reconstruction of the count map at energy ϵ1subscriptitalic-ϵ1\epsilon_{1}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

  5. 5.

    Repeat the process up to a given final energy channel ϵIsubscriptitalic-ϵ𝐼\epsilon_{I}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Of course, the actual implementation of this scheme, and, consequently, its effectiveness in reproducing a smooth spectral evolution of the flaring morphology, may depend on the choice of the count energy channel ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and of the visibility-based image reconstruction method used at step 1 to trigger the process. After presenting the mathematical description of RIS, the present study validates its performances in the case of experimental STIX visibilities recorded in correspondence with the November 11, 2022 event, also assessing the impact on the reconstructions’ reliability of different choices of the triggering energy and image reconstruction method.

The plan of the paper is as follows. Section 2 illustrates the mathematical setup of VSK-based regularized imaging spectroscopy, and Section 3 describes applications against STIX observations. Our conclusions are offered in Section 4.

2 Mathematical formulation of the method

The STIX image reconstruction problem can be written as

𝐕=𝐀𝐟,𝐕𝐀𝐟{\bf{V}}={\bf{A}}{\bf{f}}\ ,bold_V = bold_Af , (1)

where 𝐀𝐀{\bf{A}}bold_A is the the discretized version of the Fourier transform sampled at a set of points {𝐮k=(uk,vk)}k=1nsuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝐮𝑘subscript𝑢𝑘subscript𝑣𝑘𝑘1𝑛\{{\bf{u}}_{k}=(u_{k},v_{k})\}_{k=1}^{n}{ bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT inside a disk B𝐵Bitalic_B in the (u,v)𝑢𝑣(u,v)( italic_u , italic_v ) plane; 𝐕𝐕{\bf{V}}bold_V is the vector whose n𝑛nitalic_n components are the complex experimental visibilities observed by the telescope at a specific energy channel ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and in a specific time window. Finally, 𝐟𝐟{\bf{f}}bold_f is the vector whose components are the discretized values of the incoming radiation flux. Any visibility-based imaging method provides an (either linear or non-linear) estimate αsubscript𝛼{\cal{F}}_{\alpha}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of 𝐀1superscript𝐀1{\bf{A}}^{-1}bold_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT such that

𝐟α=α(𝐕)subscript𝐟𝛼subscript𝛼𝐕{\bf{f}}_{\alpha}={\cal{F}}_{\alpha}({\bf{V}})bold_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_V ) (2)

is the reconstructed image at energy channel ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The subscript α𝛼\alphaitalic_α denotes the fact that image reconstruction relies on some regularization process, tuned by means of a regularization parameter α𝛼\alphaitalic_α. Regularization reduces the numerical instabilities introduced by the limited number of Fourier samples at disposal. However, here this regularization has just a spatial meaning, and does not introduce any smoothing effect along the spectral direction. As a consequence of this, the reconstruction provided by αsubscript𝛼{\cal{F}}_{\alpha}caligraphic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_α end_POSTSUBSCRIPT when applied to the visibility set recorded by STIX at a contiguous energy interval ϵ1subscriptitalic-ϵ1\epsilon_{1}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is totally uncorrelated with respect to the reconstruction provided by the same method at ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which is significantly unreliable from a physical viewpoint.

The present study shows that a smoothing constraint in the spectral direction for imaging spectroscopy can be introduced by using numerical interpolation in the spatial frequency plane based on radial basis functions (RBFs) and variably scaled kernels (VSKs). According to what described in Perracchione et al. (2021a, b), this approach constructs the interpolant of the visibilities

P(𝐮k)=𝐕kk=1,,n,formulae-sequence𝑃subscript𝐮𝑘subscript𝐕𝑘𝑘1𝑛P({\bf{u}}_{k})={\bf{V}}_{k}\ \ \ k=1,\ldots,n\ ,italic_P ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = bold_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 1 , … , italic_n , (3)

where

P(𝐮)=k=1nakbk(𝐮),𝑃𝐮superscriptsubscript𝑘1𝑛subscript𝑎𝑘subscript𝑏𝑘𝐮P({\bf{u}})=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}b_{k}({\bf{u}})\ ,italic_P ( bold_u ) = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u ) , (4)

and

bk(𝐮)=ϕ((𝐮,ψ(𝐮))(𝐮𝐤,ψ(𝐮𝐤))),k=1,,n.formulae-sequencesubscript𝑏𝑘𝐮italic-ϕnorm𝐮𝜓𝐮subscript𝐮𝐤𝜓subscript𝐮𝐤𝑘1𝑛b_{k}({\bf{u}})=\phi(\|({\bf{u}},\psi({\bf{u}}))-({\bf{u_{k}}},\psi({\bf{u}_{k% }}))\|)\ ,\ k=1,\ldots,n.italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_u ) = italic_ϕ ( ∥ ( bold_u , italic_ψ ( bold_u ) ) - ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_ψ ( bold_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) ∥ ) , italic_k = 1 , … , italic_n . (5)

In equation (5), ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ is an appropriately chosen RBF, \|\cdot\|∥ ⋅ ∥ is the Euclidean norm, and ψ𝜓\psiitalic_ψ is a scale function encoding prior information on the flaring source. Once ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ and ψ𝜓\psiitalic_ψ have been chosen, the numerical solution of equations (3)-(5) leads to the determination of the coefficients {ak}k=1nsuperscriptsubscriptsubscript𝑎𝑘𝑘1𝑛\{a_{k}\}_{k=1}^{n}{ italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and then to the computation of the interpolated visibility surface 𝐕~~𝐕{\tilde{\bf{V}}}over~ start_ARG bold_V end_ARG such that

𝐕~j=P(𝐮~j),j=1,,N2,formulae-sequencesubscript~𝐕𝑗𝑃subscript~𝐮𝑗𝑗1superscript𝑁2{\tilde{\bf{V}}}_{j}=P({\tilde{{\bf{u}}}}_{j})\ ,\ j=1,\ldots,N^{2}\ ,over~ start_ARG bold_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_P ( over~ start_ARG bold_u end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , italic_j = 1 , … , italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (6)

where the knots {𝐮~j}j=1N2superscriptsubscriptsubscript~𝐮𝑗𝑗1superscript𝑁2\{{\tilde{{\bf{u}}}}_{j}\}_{j=1}^{N^{2}}{ over~ start_ARG bold_u end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are picked up on a regular mesh in the (u,v)𝑢𝑣(u,v)( italic_u , italic_v ) plane with N2nmuch-greater-thansuperscript𝑁2𝑛N^{2}\gg nitalic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≫ italic_n. Therefore, interpolation leads from equation (1) to

𝐕~=𝐀~𝐟~,~𝐕~𝐀~𝐟{\tilde{\bf{V}}}={\tilde{\bf{A}}}{\tilde{{\bf{f}}}}\ ,over~ start_ARG bold_V end_ARG = over~ start_ARG bold_A end_ARG over~ start_ARG bold_f end_ARG , (7)

where 𝐀~~𝐀{\tilde{\bf{A}}}over~ start_ARG bold_A end_ARG is the Fourier transform now discretized over an N2×N2superscript𝑁2superscript𝑁2N^{2}\times N^{2}italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT grid, 𝐕~~𝐕{\tilde{\bf{V}}}over~ start_ARG bold_V end_ARG is the N2×1superscript𝑁21N^{2}\times 1italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × 1 vector containing all the interpolated visibilities, and 𝐟~~𝐟{\tilde{{\bf{f}}}}over~ start_ARG bold_f end_ARG is the N2×1superscript𝑁21N^{2}\times 1italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT × 1 solution vector. The inversion of equation (7) can be performed by means of several regularization methods, although the projected Landweber iterative scheme (Piana & Bertero 1997; Perracchione et al. 2021b) proved to have super-resolving powers, thanks to the iterative application of the convex projector onto the set of vectors with non-negative components.

2.1 RIS: Regularized Imaging Spectroscopy in the count space

VSK-based interpolation/extrapolation in the visibility domain is the computational tool that allows the realization of RIS in the count space, i.e., without the need to construct the electron maps via bremsstrahlung de-convolution.

Given an input visibility vector 𝐕ϵ0subscript𝐕subscriptitalic-ϵ0{\bf{V}}_{\epsilon_{0}}bold_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at a specific triggering count energy channel ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the initialization step first applies any Fourier-based image reconstruction to generate the triggering reconstructed image 𝐟ϵ0subscript𝐟subscriptitalic-ϵ0{\bf{f}}_{\epsilon_{0}}bold_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The Fourier transform of 𝐟ϵ0subscript𝐟subscriptitalic-ϵ0{\bf{f}}_{\epsilon_{0}}bold_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is chosen as scaling function ψϵ0subscript𝜓subscriptitalic-ϵ0\psi_{\epsilon_{0}}italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Given the visibility set at ϵ1subscriptitalic-ϵ1\epsilon_{1}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (which is contiguous to ϵ0subscriptitalic-ϵ0\epsilon_{0}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT), VSK-based interpolation with ψϵ0subscript𝜓subscriptitalic-ϵ0\psi_{\epsilon_{0}}italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as scale function computes the visibility surface 𝐕~ϵ1subscript~𝐕subscriptitalic-ϵ1{\tilde{\bf{V}}}_{\epsilon_{1}}over~ start_ARG bold_V end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the application of the projected iterative scheme to obtain 𝐟ϵ1subscript𝐟subscriptitalic-ϵ1{\bf{f}}_{\epsilon_{1}}bold_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT concludes the initialization step.

Now, the sequential loop is made over a set of contiguous count energies {ϵi}i=2Isuperscriptsubscriptsubscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑖2𝐼\{\epsilon_{i}\}_{i=2}^{I}{ italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, in such a way that the Fourier transform of 𝐟~ϵi1subscript~𝐟subscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖1{\tilde{\bf{f}}}_{\epsilon_{i-1}}over~ start_ARG bold_f end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at energy ϵi1subscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖1\epsilon_{i-1}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is used as scale function for the generation of the visibility surface at energy ϵisubscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖\epsilon_{i}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and the new 𝐟~ϵisubscript~𝐟subscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖{\tilde{\bf{f}}}_{\epsilon_{i}}over~ start_ARG bold_f end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is computed by means of the usual projected iterative scheme. Therefore, this approach realizes regularization along the spectral direction by exploiting the scale function to transfer some topographical information from two contiguous energy channels. A pictorial description of this scheme is illustrated in Figure 1, which also contains the outcome of each step of the algorithm.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The regularized imaging spectroscopy algorithm and the outcomes corresponding to each one of its steps.

From a technical viewpoint, the application of RIS to STIX observations shown in the next section has been realized by means of an implementation that utilizes the Matern C0superscript𝐶0C^{0}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT kernel

ϕ(u)=eηuitalic-ϕnorm𝑢superscript𝑒𝜂norm𝑢\phi(\|u\|)=e^{-\eta\|u\|}italic_ϕ ( ∥ italic_u ∥ ) = italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_η ∥ italic_u ∥ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (8)

as RBF, where η𝜂\etaitalic_η is the so-called shape parameter. Further, the stop** rule for the projected Landweber scheme is based on a check of the χ2superscript𝜒2\chi^{2}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values, and the initialization vector is 𝐟ϵi(0)=0subscriptsuperscript𝐟0subscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖0{\bf{f}}^{(0)}_{\epsilon_{i}}=0bold_f start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 for each i=1,,I𝑖1𝐼i=1,\ldots,Iitalic_i = 1 , … , italic_I. Further, the sequential image reconstruction is interrupted at the energy channel where the signal-to-noise ratio is too low to guarantee a reliable count map. Finally, as far as the measurements are concerned, in the applications below we have utilized eight of the ten STIX detectors (this because the two detectors with highest resolution are not yet completely calibrated). This corresponds to a visibility set made of 48484848 experimental visibilities overall, where 24242424 visibilities are measured by STIX and the other 24242424 are generated accounting for the fact that V(u,v)𝑉𝑢𝑣V(-u,-v)italic_V ( - italic_u , - italic_v ) is equal to the complex conjugate of V(u,v)𝑉𝑢𝑣V(u,v)italic_V ( italic_u , italic_v ). Further, the disk B𝐵Bitalic_B has a radius of 0.030.030.030.03 arcsec-1.

3 Applications to STIX visibilities

In order to show the performances of RIS in the case of STIX data, we considered the November 11, 2022 event in the time window between 01:30:00 and 01:32:00 UT. The sequence of energy channels was made of 9999 2222-keV-wide channels starting from 46464-64 - 6 keV to 2022202220-2220 - 22 keV, plus one 3333-keV-wide channel at 2225222522-2522 - 25 keV. Figure 2 shows some light-curves corresponding to the event, and some level curves of the STIX map at 46464-64 - 6 keV (in red) and 2225222522-2522 - 25 keV (in green) as superimposed on the EUV map recorded by the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly on-board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO/AIA). The reconstruction method utilized for generating these level curves is a constrained maximum entropy method implemented in the MEM__\__GE routine of the STIX ground software (Massa et al. 2020).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Hard X-ray emission of the November 11, 2022 event in the time window between 01:30:00 and 01:32:00 UT. Left panel: STIX light-curves corresponding to three energy channels. Right panel: Level curves of the count emission provided by MEM__\__GE and superimposed to the 1600Å1600italic-Å1600\AA1600 italic_Å emission recorded by SDO/AIA (the AIA data have been appropriately reprojected in order to account for the Solar Orbiter and SDO different vantage points). The red level curves correspond to the thermal emission in the energy range 46464-64 - 6 keV, while the green ones correspond to the non-thermal emission in the energy range 2225222522-2522 - 25 keV.

The two top rows of Figure 3 contain the count maps corresponding to the November 11, 2022 event provided by RIS. The reconstruction used to trigger the scheme is the one provided by MEM__\__GE in correspondence of the visibility set recorded by STIX at 46464-64 - 6 keV (see the map in the top left panel in the first row of the figure). Here the regularized reconstructions are compared to the reconstructions provided by MEM__\__GE in the two bottom rows, from the same visibility sets but without any correlation constraint across consecutive energy channels. The comparison clearly points out that regularization nicely implies a smooth and realistic evolution of the flaring morphology, while the uncorrelated maps suffer some numerical instability particularly at high energies, where the signal-to-noise ratio of STIX counts significantly decreases.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Comparison between the maps provided at contiguous energy channels by the regularized imaging spectroscopy method and the reconstructions provided by MEM__\__GE at the same channels. Top part: reconstructions provided by RIS using the MEM__\__GE reconstruction at the top left panel as triggering image. Bottom part: reconstructions provided by MEM__\__GE.

The main advantage of this approach to imaging spectroscopy is in the possibility to reconstruct numerically stable spatially-resolved count spectra. This potentiality is illustrated in Figure 4, in which local count spectra obtained from the regularized maps in Figure 3 are compared to the ones obtained from maps reconstructed by MEM__\__GE, independently at each one of the same energy channels. The points in the flaring region at which these local spectra are computed, are identified by the colored crosses in the map at the top left panel of the figure. Once again, regularization implies numerical stability and smaller uncertainties, as demonstrated by error bars that are systematically smaller than the ones characterizing the not-regularized spectra.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Local count spectra corresponding to the points highlighted by the colored crosses superimposed to the map at the top left panel. The local spectra obtained by using the maps in Figure 3 provided by RIS are in solid line, while the ones obtained by using the maps in the same figure but provided by MEM__\__GE when independently applied at each energy channel are in dashed line.

RIS can be triggered by images reconstructed by means of different image reconstruction methods, and can start its sequential process from any energy channel (the only condition is that the energy channels involved in the process are contiguous). Therefore, one of the possibile validation issues related to this approach is concerned with robustness with respect to these two degrees of freedom. The left panel of Figure 5 compares the χ2superscript𝜒2\chi^{2}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values computed from RIS maps generated by using triggering images reconstructed by MEM__\__GE, CLEAN (Högbom 1974), and a forward-fit algorithm realized by means of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) (Volpara et al. 2022). In all these cases the triggering energy is the 46464-64 - 6 keV energy channel. In order to show the reliability of RIS maps, the left panel in the figure also shows the χ2superscript𝜒2\chi^{2}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values obtained from maps provided by the MEM__\__GE algorithm with no correlation constraint across the energies. The right panel does the same in the case of three different choices of the triggering energy channel when, in all cases, the triggering image is the ones provided by MEM__\__GE. Specifically, the triggering energies are ϵ0=46subscriptitalic-ϵ046\epsilon_{0}=4-6italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4 - 6 keV (i.e., regularization proceeds from low to high energies); ϵ0=1416subscriptitalic-ϵ01416\epsilon_{0}=14-16italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 14 - 16 keV, i.e. regularization starts at an intermediate energy and from that proceeds to both low and high energies; ϵ0=2225subscriptitalic-ϵ02225\epsilon_{0}=22-25italic_ϵ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 22 - 25 keV, i.e. regularization proceeds from high to low energies. In all these cases, the χ2superscript𝜒2\chi^{2}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values are rather stable and decreases consistently from low to high energies, given that χ2superscript𝜒2\chi^{2}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is normalized with respect to the experimental standard deviation, which is smaller at low energies. Interestingly, the best fit associated to the regularization flow from high to low energies is more accurate than the one associated to the low-to-high-energy flow, which has a rather immediate physical interpretation. Indeed, bremsstrahlung implies that high energy photons (and the corresponding counts) are produced by a small number of electrons. As a consequence, when the triggering energy is high, regularization flows along the same direction of the increase of the physics-induced uncertainty.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Robustness of RIS with respect to the reconstruction method applied to generate the triggering image and on the triggering energy. Left panel: χ2superscript𝜒2\chi^{2}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values at different energies when the triggering image is reconstrcuted by means of MEM__\__GE (black), forward-fit with PSO (red) and CLEAN (green). The χ2superscript𝜒2\chi^{2}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values provided by MEM__\__GE independently at each energy channel are shown in blue. Right panel: χ2superscript𝜒2\chi^{2}italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values at different energies when the triggering energy corresponds to the lowest channel and the regularization process flows from low to high energies (black), the triggering energy corresponds to the highest channel and the regularization process flows from high to low energies (red), and the triggering energy has an intermediate value with the regularization process flowing along both directions (green).

4 Conclusions

RIS is a regularization method for the reconstruction of count maps from STIX visibilities at different energy channels, which are characterized by a smooth behavior across such energies. This smoothing constraint is imposed by means of a sequential scheme based on the use of VSK interpolation in the spatial frequency domain. The main advantage of this approach is that, from these regularized maps, it is possibile to produce spatially-resolved count spectra characterized by unprecedented numerical stability. RIS is also robust with respect to the choice of both the reconstruction method applied to generate the image that triggers the regularization process, and the triggering energy channel.

In our opinion, next research concerning RIS may have two possible developments. First, from a physical viewpoint, the systematic use of regularized local count spectra will allow a spectroscopy-based and reliable description of the interplay of thermal and non-thermal mechanisms in solar flares at different locations in the flaring region. Second, from a methodological viewpoint, the RIS approach might be extended to a regularized approach to dynamical studies of the flaring emission, where the VSK-based smoothing constraint will be realized across contiguous time intervals.

Acknowledgements

Solar Orbiter is a space mission of international collaboration between ESA and NASA, operated by ESA. The STIX instrument is an international collaboration between Switzerland, Poland, France, Czech Republic, Germany, Austria, Ireland, and Italy. AV, MP, and AMM acknowledge the support of the “Accordo ASI/INAF Solar Orbiter: Supporto scientifico per la realizzazione degli strumenti Metis, SWA/DPU e STIX nelle Fasi D-E”, and the HORIZON Europe ARCAFF Project, grant No. 101082164. MP also acknowledges financial support under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.1, Call for tender No. 104 published on 2.2.2022 by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR), funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU– Project Title ’Inverse Problems in Imaging Sciences (IPIS)” – CUP D53D23005740006 - Grant Assignment Decree No. 973 adopted on 30/06/2023 by the Italian Ministry of Ministry of University and Research (MUR).

References

  • Battaglia & Benz (2006) Battaglia, M. & Benz, A. O. 2006, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 456, 751
  • Bertero et al. (2021) Bertero, M., Boccacci, P., & De Mol, C. 2021, Introduction to inverse problems in imaging (CRC press)
  • Bozzini et al. (2015) Bozzini, M., Lenarduzzi, L., Rossini, M., & Schaback, R. 2015, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 35, 199
  • Guo et al. (2012) Guo, J., Emslie, A. G., Kontar, E. P., et al. 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 543, A53
  • Högbom (1974) Högbom, J. 1974, ApJS, 15, 417
  • Hurford et al. (2002) Hurford, G., Schmahl, E., Schwartz, R., et al. 2002, Sol. Phys., 210, 61
  • Koch & Motz (1959) Koch, H. W. & Motz, J. W. 1959, Reviews of Modern Physics, 31, 920
  • Krucker et al. (2020) Krucker, S., Hurford, G. J., Grimm, O., et al. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 642, A15
  • Lin et al. (2002) Lin, R., Dennis, B., Hurford, G., et al. 2002, Sol. Phys., 210, 3
  • Martínez Oliveros et al. (2011) Martínez Oliveros, J. C., Couvidat, S., Schou, J., et al. 2011, Solar Physics, 269, 269
  • Massa et al. (2023) Massa, P., Hurford, G. J., Volpara, A., et al. 2023, Solar Physics, 298, 114
  • Massa et al. (2020) Massa, P., Schwartz, R., Tolbert, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 894, 46
  • Perracchione et al. (2021a) Perracchione, E., Massa, P., Massone, A. M., & Piana, M. 2021a, Astrophysical Journal, 919, 133
  • Perracchione et al. (2021b) Perracchione, E., Massone, A. M., & Piana, M. 2021b, Inverse Problems, 37, 105001
  • Petrosian & Chen (2010) Petrosian, V. & Chen, Q. 2010, Astrophysical Journall, 712, L131
  • Piana & Bertero (1997) Piana, M. & Bertero, M. 1997, Inverse Probl., 13, 441
  • Piana et al. (2022) Piana, M., Emslie, A. G., Massone, A. M., & Dennis, B. R. 2022, Hard X-ray Imaging of Solar Flares, Vol. 164 (Springer)
  • Piana et al. (2007) Piana, M., Massone, A. M., Hurford, G. J., et al. 2007, Astrophysical Journal, 665, 846
  • Prato et al. (2009) Prato, M., Piana, M., Emslie, A. G., et al. 2009, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2, 910
  • Volpara et al. (2024) Volpara, A., Massa, P., Krucker, S., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 684, A185
  • Volpara et al. (2022) Volpara, A., Massa, P., Perracchione, E., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 668, A145
  • Xu et al. (2008) Xu, Y., Emslie, A. G., & Hurford, G. J. 2008, Astrophysical Journal, 673, 576
  • Zhang et al. (2019) Zhang, Z., Chen, D.-Y., Wu, J., et al. 2019, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 19, 160