Multi-Phase Thermal Structure & The Origin of the Broad-Line Region, Torus, and Corona in Magnetically-Dominated Accretion Disks

Active galactic nuclei (AGN) and quasars are powered by accretion disks around supermassive BHs (Schmidt, 1963; Soltan, 1982), with accretion rates exceeding $\gtrsim 10\,{\rm M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}}$ in the most luminous sources. It has been known for decades that there must be multi-phase gas structure around such BHs, with large covering factors or vertical extent above the midplane (e.g. Davidson & Netzer, 1979; Peterson, 1997; Krolik, 1999, and references therein), in order to explain many observational features of their spectra and variability. This includes, for example (1) optical narrow line regions (NLR), probably from more “typical” interstellar medium (ISM) gas in the AGN host galaxy; (2) the infrared dusty “torii” of clumpy gas with $\mathcal{O}(1)$ covering factor, cool and well-shielded enough to host dust at a range of temperatures in “clumpy” structures at $\sim 0.01-10\,$pc (Antonucci, 1993; Urry & Padovani, 1995; Burtscher et al., 2013); (3) the optical/UV broad emission line region (BLR), believed to come from partially-ionized gas at $\sim 10^{4}$ K with a range of densities but relatively modest range of ionization parameters at $\sim 1-100\,$ld distances, reprocessing $\sim 10-20\%$ of the light in a thick-disk type geometry (Kaspi et al., 2005; Peterson, 2006; Gravity Collaboration et al., 2018); (4) an extended, relatively cool central thermal optical/UV continuum region perhaps dominated by scattering (potentially related to any extended scattering surface from a thick disk, or outflows/“warm absorbers,” or patchy cloud-covering) to explain both the weak dependence of AGN SEDs on BH mass and microlensing observations indicating emission or reprocessing of continuum at large radii (Laor et al., 1997; Dai et al., 2010; Giustini & Proga, 2019); (5) “warm” ($\sim 1\,$keV) Comptonizing structures covering the thermal continuum source needed to explain the EUV/soft X-ray excess (Kubota & Done, 2018; Liu & Qiao, 2022) and a more diffuse/extended “hard” ($\sim 10-100\,$keV) X-ray corona, plus again large covering-factor scattering structures needed to explain the X-ray reflection spectra (George & Fabian, 1991; Haardt & Maraschi, 1991; Marinucci et al., 2018).

Many theoretical papers have been written about the potential origins of these various multi-phase structures. But notably, the vast majority assume as a starting point that the accretion disk itself is thermal and/or radiation-pressure dominated, and so is qualitatively something akin to a Shakura & Sunyaev (1973)-like $\alpha$-disk (hereafter SS73), whether geometrically “thin” or supercritical/“slim.” While there are many variant accretion disk models in the literature, (including radiatively inefficient, advection-dominated, magnetically-arrested, magnetically-elevated, “slim,” and gravito-turbulent disks; for reviews see Frank et al. 2002; Abramowicz & Fragile 2013), for luminous quasars the fundamental assumption of SS73, that magnetic pressure is small compared to thermal pressure ($\beta\gg 1$), is still most often the “baseline” for both analytic studies, observational forward-modeling, or setting up initial conditions for idealized accretion-disk simulations. Importantly, in this category of thermal-pressure dominated $\alpha$-disk models, the multi-phase structure observed must arise “outside” of the accretion disk: the disk itself cannot be multi-phase (for reasons we review below), nor if it were, could it reproduce the observed properties of these different multi-phase structures (for example, their large covering factors to the central source). Moreover, it has been known for decades that thermal-pressure dominated disks are violently gravitationally unstable at most of these radii, and predict gas densities and temperatures many orders-of-magnitude different (at the same distances from the BH) to those inferred for the BLR/torus/Comptonizing and scattering surfaces/coronae (Goodman, 2003). This in turn has led to other many other models for the origins of this multi-phase structure, including popular ideas such as the BLR being a part of an outflow or “failed wind”/fountain-flow (Murray et al., 1995; Krolik & Begelman, 1988; Elitzur & Shlosman, 2006; Naddaf et al., 2021). But these have their own challenges, and some variants of such models may even be ruled out by recent observations finding a rotating, thick-disk geometry (Gravity Collaboration et al., 2018; GRAVITY Collaboration et al., 2020, 2021).

Recently, Hopkins et al. (2024b, Paper I) and Hopkins et al. (2024c, Paper II) presented the first simulations to self-consistently follow gas in a cosmological simulation from $>$ Mpc to $<100\,$au scales (a few hundred gravitational radii) around an accreting SMBH, including the physics of magnetic fields (seeded from trace cosmological values), multi-band radiation-hydrodynamics, non-equilibrium multi-phase radiative thermo-chemistry and cooling, self-gravity, star formation, and stellar evolution/feedback (jets, stellar mass-loss, radiation, supernovae). In these simulations, gas around the black hole radius of influence (BHROI)¹¹1Defined as the radius interior to which the BH dominates the potential over its host galaxy of characteristic velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm gal}$, or $R_{\rm BHROI}\sim G\,M_{\rm bh}/\sigma_{\rm gal}^{2}$ (about $\sim 5\,{\rm pc}$ in the reference simulations). is tidally captured by the SMBH of mass $M_{\rm bh}\sim 10^{7}\,M_{\odot}$ from larger-scale ISM gas complexes in the galaxy, and free-falls briefly before circularizing to form an accretion disk with $Q\gg 1$ and little to no star formation or fragmentation on sub-pc scales. This disk evolves in quasi-steady-state and sustains super-critical accretion (up to $\dot{M}\sim 20-30\,{\rm M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}}$) onto the SMBH for at least $\sim 10^{5}$ disk dynamical times (the simulation duration). Crucially, in Paper II where the disk properties were studied in detail, it was shown that these “hyper-magnetized” and “flux-frozen” disks have $\beta\sim 10^{-4}-10^{-2}$ in the midplane, in the form of primarily toroidal magnetic field (but with mean radial fields and quasi-isotropic turbulent fields only a factor of a few less strong) owing to amplification of magnetic flux accreted from the ISM. These stabilize the disk against catastrophic fragmentation and star formation: without magnetic fields, the disks were shown to be orders-of-magnitude less massive and support factor of $\sim 1000$ lower accretion rates and higher star formation rates. The disks also have a flared structure ($H/R\sim 0.1-1$ at large radii) with weak vertical stratification owing to trans-Alfvénic, highly super-sonic turbulence, which is sustained by rapid cooling ($\mathcal{M}_{A}\sim v_{\rm turb}/v_{A}\sim 1$, with $\mathcal{M}_{s}^{2}\sim 1/\beta\sim 1/t_{\rm cool}\,\Omega\gg 1$). With it now possible to capture these multi-scale ISM-to-disk conditions, since Paper I these flux-frozen disks have been seen in a number of other simulations of distinct parameter spaces including sub-Eddington accretion of galactic hot gas onto much more massive BHs (Guo et al., 2024) and accretion onto intermediate-mass to $\sim 10^{6}\,{\rm M}_{\odot}$ BHs in dense star clusters (Shi et al., 2024a, b), as well as more idealized simulations with the appropriate initial conditions (e.g. Gaburov et al. 2012, as well as Squire et al., in prep., Guo et al., in prep., Tomar et al., in prep.).

Here, we show that such disks could present a natural solution to the puzzle of the origin of the various multi-phase structures or components of the AGN ecosystem reviewed above. We take the simple analytic flux-frozen disk model in Hopkins et al. (2024d) (Paper III; which was shown therein to reasonably reproduce the simulation properties from Paper I-Paper II), and explore the opacity and thermal structure of the disk in more detail.²²2Note that Paper II-Paper III briefly discussed an extremely simple estimate of the characteristic disk temperatures, but this largely ignored the details of the real opacity and thermo-chemistry in the disk, as it was only intended to demonstrate that for even the most extreme plausible opacity structure producing the highest possible disk temperatures, the disk models above would still be self-consistent in that they would still maintain $\beta\ll 1$ in the midplane down to horizon scales. Moreover their discussion was primarily focused on the largest radii in the disk, and ignored much of the phenomenology we discuss here. We find that – without introducing any new “components” or parameters to the model – this naturally predicts both the existence and properties (including densities, temperatures, scale heights/covering factors, reprocessed light fractions, ionization parameters, and clum**/density variations) of many different AGN ecosystem components above including the dusty “torus”; the broad-line region; a cooler, more spatially extended scattering effective central emitter (compared to SS73); and the warm Comptonizing and hard coronae. The gravitational, thermal, and buoyant stability of this gas, as well as its location/height above the midplane, are naturally explained by the disk itself – in brief, they are “held up” by magnetic fields. Crucially, these flux-frozen disks are (1) vastly geometrically thicker and more strongly-flared at large radii, (2) much lower density and lower mass/surface density, and (3) much more strongly turbulent (in terms of the sonic Mach number $\mathcal{M}_{s}\equiv v_{\rm turb}/c_{s}$) than thermal-pressure-dominated disks. These completely change the predictions for their thermal structure.

In § 2, we outline some fundamental assumptions and scalings we will use throughout (common variables are defined in Table 1 for reference). In subsequent sections, we divide the disk into “zones” where different gas phases or sources of illumination dominate, outlined in Fig. 1, which we discuss in subsequent sections, including the galactic ISM (§ 3), dust torus (§ 4), broad-line region (§ 5), neutral (§ 6) and multi-phase (§ 7) optically-thin disks, central thermalized and blackbody-emitting disk (§ 8), corona (§ 9), and extended scattering layers and surfaces (§ 10). We describe how behavior should change at both super-critical and highly subcritical accretion rates (§ 11), and briefly comment on outflows and jets there and in § 12. We discuss the key differences from thermal or radiation-pressure dominated disks in § 13, and conclude in § 14.

We now consider different regions or “zones” around the BH, roughly proceeding “outside-in” with the accretion flow (Fig. 1). We divide the zones by their qualitative thermochemical and radiative behaviors (Fig. 2), which are determined by the dominant gas phases and heating/cooling processes (Figs. 3, 4, 6, 7, 8). Fig. 1 shows the definitions of these zones; Fig. 2 illustrates the key properties of the dominant gas phases in each zone and their connections to different classic structures known around AGN.

Beginning from the largest radii, therefore, at $R\gtrsim r_{\rm ff}\sim R_{\rm BHROI}$, we are fully outside the regime where the BH dominates the gravitational potential, so cannot in any meaningful way talk about being in an “accretion disk.” Of course gas may lose angular momentum and flow into this general region from the outer galaxy or intergalactic medium (IGM), but this is the galactic ISM in the galaxy nucleus/bulge center, and such flows are governed by galactic dynamics. This should be multi-phase, dusty, clumpy, and can have a covering factor for optical obscuration of the AGN ranging from nil (in e.g. “passive” elliptical host galaxies) to $\sim 100\%$ (in e.g. starburst nuclei with isotropic, Compton-thick nuclear dust columns), as discussed in e.g. Simcoe et al. (1997); Hopkins et al. (2005a, b, c, d); Hopkins et al. (2006); Ghosh et al. (2007); Trump et al. (2009); Trump (2011); Hopkins et al. (2012a); Gilli et al. (2022); Glikman et al. (2024). So certainly part of the clumpy torus and some re-emission/reprocessing can arise from these radii: e.g. dust directly exposed to an unobscured QSO sightline can reach dust temperatures

modestly higher than the median $\sim 70-100\,$K expected from illumination just by stars in a starburst environment (Sanders et al., 1988; Narayanan et al., 2005; Veilleux et al., 2009; Younger et al., 2009b; Pope et al., 2008; Greve et al., 2009; Younger et al., 2009a; Narayanan et al., 2011; Hayward et al., 2011). And of course, the NLR will arise from gas on these scales (Stark & Carlson, 1984; Bennert et al., 2002; Rice et al., 2006; Meena et al., 2022). But modeling these scales in more detail depends on the galactic environment, star formation properties, morphology, etc., and most of the gas properties will depend on the detailed physics of star formation and stellar feedback self-regulating the galactic ISM (see Paper I and Hopkins & Quataert 2010b; Hopkins et al. 2016; Anglés-Alcázar et al. 2021; Hopkins et al. 2022a; Wellons et al. 2023; Byrne et al. 2023a, b; Mercedes-Feliz et al. 2023; Cochrane et al. 2023; Mercedes-Feliz et al. 2024), and so is outside the scope of our focus here.

The first region where our model applies is just interior to $r_{\rm ff}\sim R_{\rm BHROI}$ (Figs. 1-2). We expect, just like in the ISM, the medium to be dusty (given the dust temperature scaling above, we are well exterior to the sublimation radius $R_{\rm sub}$). For dust one can approximate the ratio of absorption to total opacities as $\kappa_{a}/(\kappa_{a}+\kappa_{s})\sim 1-0.5\,(1+10^{5.72}\,(1+T_{\rm rad}^{2})^{-1})^{-1}$ (compare Weingartner & Draine, 2001; Semenov et al., 2003; Draine, 2011) for a given radiation temperature $T_{\rm rad}$, which is $\kappa_{a}/(\kappa_{a}+\kappa_{s})\approx 0.5$ for $T_{\rm rad}\gtrsim 1000\,$K and $\kappa_{a}/(\kappa_{a}+\kappa_{s})\approx 1$ for $T_{\rm rad}\lesssim 1000$ K. So at the cold temperatures of interest in the outermost disk, the dust opacity will be primarily absorption (and in the warmest parts the scattering opacity is at most comparable to absorption). This means the “effective” optical depth from the midplane to infinity, $\tau^{\ast}\equiv\int_{0}^{\infty}\sqrt{\kappa_{a}\,(\kappa_{a}+\kappa_{s})}\,\rho(R,\,z)\,dz\approx\langle\sqrt{\kappa_{a}\,(\kappa_{a}+\kappa_{s})}\rangle\,\Sigma_{\rm gas}/2$ (where the surface densities follow the fiducial scalings for these disks from Eq. 2, illustrated in Fig. 3) and the “total” optical depth $\tau\equiv\langle\kappa_{a}+\kappa_{s}\rangle\,\Sigma_{\rm gas}/2$ are roughly equal to the absorption optical depth $\tau_{\rm abs}=\kappa_{a}\,\Sigma_{\rm gas}/2$. The absorption opacity $\kappa_{a}$ can be approximated (at the level of approximation here, ignoring detailed substructure within the disk and chemical inhomogenity, etc.) as ${\rm MIN}[5\,,3\,(T_{\rm rad}/100\,{\rm K})^{\beta}]\,\tilde{Z}\,{\rm cm^{2}\,g^{-1}}$ with $\beta\approx 1.5$ and $\tilde{Z}\equiv Z/Z_{\odot}$,⁴⁴4Our scalings can be extrapolated to any $\tilde{Z}$, but motivated by modern numerical simulations and more detailed QSO full-spectrum line modeling (e.g. Temple et al., 2021b), we will often refer to a reference $\tilde{Z}\sim 1$, as opposed to the highly super-Solar $\tilde{Z}\sim 10-50$ sometimes invoked in older quasar models (these highly super-solar values are based on more simplified older line models which assumed all observed lines come from a single density and ionization parameter and source distance). until $T_{\rm dust}\gtrsim 1500-2000\,$K where the dust sublimates ($\tilde{Z}\rightarrow 0$) (Semenov et al., 2003; Draine, 2011). These tabulations for the opacities are used for the calculation of the opacities in this zone shown in Fig. 7. Given that the free electron fractions in this region are $\lesssim 0.01$ (Paper I), and metallicities are $\tilde{Z}\sim 1$, this will dominate over other sources of opacity. So we have:

where $T_{100}\equiv T_{\rm rad}/100\,{\rm K}$. Fig. 1 shows the range of scales (calculated below) over which this “zone” applies; Fig. 2 illustrates the characteristic thermochemical properties qualitatively, and breaks the zone up into sub-zones which we describe below. The quantitative values of the temperature, opacity, and pressure properties, given the approximations in this section, are shown for various values of the BH mass and accretion rate in Figs. 6, 7, 8, respectively.

Note the covering factor reaches $\sim 0.7$ for the very outer edge of this disk as $R\rightarrow r_{\rm ff}$, but only some of this is able to be illuminated by the central disk (illustrated in Fig. 9). At the (order-unity) values of $H/R$ predicted for the radii of interest here, it makes a negligible difference for our conclusions whether we assume the central source is an optically-thick flat aligned disk or assume quasi-isotropic illumination (i.e. either form of the function $f_{\theta}$ in § 2.4 we assume gives nearly identical results).