KamLAND-Zen Collaboration

Search for Majorana Neutrinos with the Complete KamLAND-Zen Dataset

S. Abe Present address: Kamioka Observatory, Institute for Cosmic-Ray Research, The University of Tokyo, Hida, Gifu 506-1205, Japan Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    T. Araki Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Chiba Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    T. Eda Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    M. Eizuka Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    Y. Funahashi Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    A. Furuto Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    A. Gando Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    Y. Gando Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan Department of Human Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan    S. Goto Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    T. Hachiya Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Hata Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Ichimura Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    S. Ieki Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    H. Ikeda Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Inoue Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Ishidoshiro Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    Y. Kamei Present address: Center for Advanced Photonics, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    N. Kawada Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    Y. Kishimoto Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    M. Koga Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan    A. Marthe Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    Y. Matsumoto Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    T. Mitsui Present address: Faculty of Health Sciences, Butsuryo College of Osaka, Sakai, Osaka 593-8328, Japan Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    H. Miyake Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan Graduate Program on Physics for the Universe, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    D. Morita Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    R. Nakajima Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Nakamura Present address: Faculty of Health Sciences, Butsuryo College of Osaka, Sakai, Osaka 593-8328, Japan Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    R. Nakamura Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    R. Nakamura Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    J. Nakane Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    T. Ono Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    H. Ozaki Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Saito Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    T. Sakai Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    I. Shimizu Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    J. Shirai Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Shiraishi Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    A. Suzuki Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Tachibana Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Tamae Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    H. Watanabe Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    K. Watanabe Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan    S. Yoshida Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan    S. Umehara Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan    K. Fushimi Department of Physics, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan    K. Kotera Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8502, Japan    Y. Urano Present address: Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8577, Japan Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8502, Japan    B.E. Berger Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    B.K. Fujikawa Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    J.G. Learned Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA    J. Maricic Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA    Z. Fu Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA    S. Ghosh Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA    J. Smolsky Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA    L.A. Winslow Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA    Y. Efremenko Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA    H.J. Karwowski Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
Physics Departments at Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA;
and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
   D.M. Markoff Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
Physics Departments at Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA;
and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
   W. Tornow Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
Physics Departments at Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina 27707, USA;
and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
   S. Dell’Oro Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA    T. O’Donnell Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA    J.A. Detwiler Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA    S. Enomoto Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA    M.P. Decowski Nikhef and the University of Amsterdam, Science Park, Amsterdam, the Netherlands    K.M. Weerman Nikhef and the University of Amsterdam, Science Park, Amsterdam, the Netherlands    C. Grant Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA    Ö. Penek Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA    H. Song Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA    A. Li Halıcıoğlu Data Science Institute, Department of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093, USA    S.N. Axani Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA    M. Garcia Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA    M. Sarfraz Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA
(June 17, 2024)
Abstract

We present a search for neutrinoless double-beta (0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β) decay of 136Xe using the full KamLAND-Zen 800 dataset with 745 kg of enriched xenon, corresponding to an exposure of 2.0972.0972.0972.097 ton yr of 136Xe. This updated search benefits from a more than twofold increase in exposure, recovery of photo-sensor gain, and reduced background from muon-induced spallation of xenon. Combining with the search in the previous KamLAND-Zen phase, we obtain a lower limit for the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay half-life of T1/20ν>3.8×1026superscriptsubscript𝑇120𝜈3.8superscript1026T_{1/2}^{0\nu}>3.8\times 10^{26}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 3.8 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT yr at 90% C.L., a factor of 1.7 improvement over the previous limit. The corresponding upper limits on the effective Majorana neutrino mass are in the range 28–122 meV using phenomenological nuclear matrix element calculations.

The search for neutrinoless double-beta (0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β) decay is an active field of research in nuclear and particle physics Agostini2023 . Observation of this decay would prove the Majorana nature of neutrinos and demonstrate the non-conservation of lepton number, a key feature of Leptogenesis, which can explain the imbalance of the matter over antimatter in the Universe Fukugita1986 . In the model of light Majorana neutrino exchange, the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay rate is proportional to the square of the effective Majorana neutrino mass mββ|ΣiUei2mνi|delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽subscriptΣ𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑈𝑒𝑖2subscript𝑚subscript𝜈𝑖\left<m_{\beta\beta}\right>\equiv\left|\Sigma_{i}U_{ei}^{2}m_{\nu_{i}}\right|⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ ≡ | roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT |. The most stringent limit to date has been provided by KamLAND-Zen, reaching the inverted mass ordering (IO) region below 50 meV for the first time Abe2023a . An improved search covering the unexplored IO region would stringently test theoretical models predicting mββdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽\left<m_{\beta\beta}\right>⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ in this range Harigaya2012 ; Asaka2020 ; Asai2020 , with a significantly increased chance to observe 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay Agostini2017 .

The KamLAND-Zen (KamLAND Zero-Neutrino Double-Beta Decay) Gando2012a ; Gando2012b ; Gando2013a ; Asakura2016 ; Gando2016 ; Gando2019 ; Abe2023a experiment utilizes the low-background KamLAND detector to search for 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay. Enriched xenon is dissolved in liquid scintillator (Xe-LS) contained in a teardrop-shaped inner balloon (IB). The IB is constructed from 25-μ𝜇\muitalic_μm-thick transparent nylon film and is suspended at the center of the KamLAND detector. The IB is surrounded by 1 kton of LS (Outer LS) contained in a 13-m-diameter spherical outer balloon. Scintillation light is viewed by 1,325 17-inch and 554 20-inch photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) mounted on an 18-m-diameter spherical stainless-steel tank. In the previous phase of the experiment (KamLAND-Zen 400) with 381 kg of enriched xenon, we probed the quasidegenerate neutrino mass region Gando2016 . To further improve the search sensitivity, the KamLAND-Zen collaboration upgraded the experiment (KamLAND-Zen 800) to 745 kg of enriched xenon, nearly twice the target mass of the previous phase. To hold the increased xenon, we constructed a larger and cleaner 3.80-m-diameter IB Gando2021 . The Xe-LS consists of 82% decane and 18% pseudocumene (1,2,4-trimethylbenzene) by volume, 2.4 g/liter of the fluor PPO (2,5-diphenyloxazole), and (3.13±0.01)plus-or-minus3.130.01(3.13\pm 0.01)( 3.13 ± 0.01 )% by weight of isotopically enriched xenon gas. The isotopic abundances in the enriched xenon are (90.85±0.13)%percentplus-or-minus90.850.13(90.85\pm 0.13)\%( 90.85 ± 0.13 ) % 136Xe and (8.82±0.01)%percentplus-or-minus8.820.01(8.82\pm 0.01)\%( 8.82 ± 0.01 ) % 134Xe.

KamLAND-Zen 800 completed data-taking in January 2024 to start dismantling the current KamLAND detector in preparation for a detector upgrade, KamLAND2-Zen. This Letter reports on the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay analysis with the full KamLAND-Zen 800 dataset collected between February 5, 2019, and January 12, 2024, and its combination with the earlier KamLAND-Zen 400 data.

The experimental signal is a characteristic peak in the energy distribution, produced by the two esuperscript𝑒e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT emitted from 136Xe ββ𝛽𝛽\beta\betaitalic_β italic_β decay. For hypothetical 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decays, their sum energy is always 2.458 MeV (Q-value of 136Xe ββ𝛽𝛽\beta\betaitalic_β italic_β decay) Redshaw2007 , while for 2νββ2𝜈𝛽𝛽2\nu\beta\beta2 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decays the sum has a continuous spectrum up to the Q-value. Event vertex and energy are reconstructed based on the timing and charge distributions of photoelectrons (p.e.) recorded by the PMTs. Energy calibration is performed using 214Bi β𝛽\betaitalic_β’s and γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ’s from 222Rn (τ=5.5𝜏5.5\tau=5.5italic_τ = 5.5 days), introduced during the initial filling of the IB with Xe-LS, and 2.225 MeV γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ’s from capture of spallation neutrons by protons. The detector Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is based on Geant4 Agostinelli2003 ; Allison2006 and is tuned to reproduce the timing and charge distributions observed in the data. The estimated energy and vertex resolutions in the Xe-LS are 6.7%/E(MeV)𝐸MeV\sqrt{E({\rm MeV})}square-root start_ARG italic_E ( roman_MeV ) end_ARG and 13.7 cm/E(MeV)𝐸MeV\sqrt{E({\rm MeV})}square-root start_ARG italic_E ( roman_MeV ) end_ARG, respectively.

During the earlier period in KamLAND-Zen 800, we observed an increasing trend in the number of low photo-detection efficiency PMTs caused by age-related gain decrease. The resulting degradation in energy resolution could increase the background from 2νββ2𝜈𝛽𝛽2\nu\beta\beta2 italic_ν italic_β italic_β tails. In March 2020, we started a continuous campaign modifying the input circuitry of the KamLAND front-end electronics (FEE) to counter the PMT gain decrease. The 1 p.e. gain and timing offsets due to the circuit modification are corrected for each PMT based on photon counting with high-statistics background events. Owing to these restoration efforts, we have succeeded in preventing the degradation of the energy resolution by a factor of 1.2, which would have lead to a twofold increase of the 2νββ2𝜈𝛽𝛽2\nu\beta\beta2 italic_ν italic_β italic_β background.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Vertex distribution of candidate singles data (SD) events (black points) in the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β energy window 2.35<E<2.70MeV2.35𝐸2.70MeV2.35<E<2.70\,{\rm MeV}2.35 < italic_E < 2.70 roman_MeV. The thick black and red lines indicate the shape of the IB and the 1.57-m-radius spherical volume, respectively. The dot-dashed line indicates the nylon belt suspending the IB. The thin dashed lines illustrate the shape of the equal-volume spherical half-shells, which compose the 2.5-m-radius spherical fiducial volume. The high-count region at the IB bottom within the yellow solid line indicates the hot spot and is removed through a 0.7 m radius cut.

We apply the following cuts to select ββ𝛽𝛽\beta\betaitalic_β italic_β decay events: (i) The reconstructed vertex must be within 2.5 m of the detector center and 0.7 m away from the bottom hot spot on the IB, which is outlined in Fig. 1. (ii) Muons and events within 2 ms after muons are rejected. (iii) Bi-Po decay pairs are eliminated by a delayed coincidence tag, which requires the time and distance between the prompt Bi and delayed Po decay candidates to be less than 1.9 ms and 1.7 m, respectively, and by rejecting events with a double pulse identification within a single event acquisition window. Those cuts remove (99.95±0.03)plus-or-minus99.950.03(99.95\pm 0.03)( 99.95 ± 0.03 )% of 214Bi-214Po events, and (97.9±0.5)plus-or-minus97.90.5(97.9\pm 0.5)( 97.9 ± 0.5 )% of 212Bi-212Po. (iv) Reactor ν¯esubscript¯𝜈𝑒\overline{\nu}_{e}over¯ start_ARG italic_ν end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT’s identified by a delayed coincidence of positrons and neutron-capture γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ’s are rejected. (v) Poorly reconstructed events are rejected. These events are tagged using a vertex-time-charge discriminator which measures how well the observed PMT time-charge distributions match those expected based on the reconstructed vertex. The overall selection inefficiency is less than 0.1%.

Background sources external to the Xe-LS are dominated by radioactive impurities on the IB film. The contamination levels of 238U and 232Th are (4.3±0.2)×1012plus-or-minus4.30.2superscript1012(4.3\pm 0.2)\times 10^{-12}( 4.3 ± 0.2 ) × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT g/g and (2.4±0.1)×1011plus-or-minus2.40.1superscript1011(2.4\pm 0.1)\times 10^{-11}( 2.4 ± 0.1 ) × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT g/g, respectively, which are roughly a factor of 10 smaller than those measured on the previous IB Gando2016 . The reference calculations for 238U and 232Th mentioned here assume secular equilibrium for comparison with the previously reported values. In the earlier period of the dataset, we found an increase in the background rate at the IB bottom, possibly due to the settling of dust particles containing radioactive impurities. To avoid this possible background, we tag and remove this high-background period from the dataset using machine learning algorithms, as discussed in Ref. Abe2023a ; Li2023 .

Solar neutrinos are an intrinsic background source for KamLAND-Zen. Based on neutrino flux calculations using the standard solar model Serenelli2011 , the elastic scattering (ES) of 8B solar neutrinos on electrons in the Xe-LS is estimated to be (4.9±0.2)×103plus-or-minus4.90.2superscript103(4.9\pm 0.2)\times 10^{-3}( 4.9 ± 0.2 ) × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (ton day)-1, including the effect of three-flavor neutrino oscillations. The charged-current (CC) interactions on 136Xe produce esuperscript𝑒e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, 136Cs, and γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ’s from the excited states, and the subsequent decays of 136Cs (τ=19.0𝜏19.0\tau=19.0italic_τ = 19.0 days, Q=2.548𝑄2.548Q=2.548italic_Q = 2.548 MeV) create a background peak around 2.0 MeV in visible energy, mostly overlap** with the resolution tail of 2νββ2𝜈𝛽𝛽2\nu\beta\beta2 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decays. The interaction rate is expected to be (0.8±0.1)×103plus-or-minus0.80.1superscript103(0.8\pm 0.1)\times 10^{-3}( 0.8 ± 0.1 ) × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (ton day)-1 based on the cross section calculated in Ref. Ejiri2014 ; Frekers2013 .

Cosmic-ray muons produce neutrons and radioactive isotopes through nuclear spallation of carbon and xenon, which decay by emitting β𝛽\betaitalic_β’s or γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ’s. To remove these events, we apply cuts based on space and time correlation with muon and neutron capture γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ events. In the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β window, decays of 10C (τ=27.8𝜏27.8\tau=27.8italic_τ = 27.8 s, Q=3.65𝑄3.65Q=3.65italic_Q = 3.65 MeV) and 6He (τ=1.16s𝜏1.16s\tau=1.16\,{\rm s}italic_τ = 1.16 roman_s, Q=3.51MeV𝑄3.51MeVQ=3.51\,{\rm MeV}italic_Q = 3.51 roman_MeV) dominate the muon spallation backgrounds. To reduce these short-lived backgrounds, we remove events within 150 ms after muons, and events reconstructed within 1.6 m of neutron vertices for 180 s. In addition, we reject remaining background events by the “shower” likelihood method based on reconstructed muon shower profiles Li2014 ; Li2015a ; Li2015b ; Zhang2016 ; Abe2023b . The overall rejection efficiencies for 10C and 6He are >>>99.799.799.799.7% and (97.3±1.5)%percentplus-or-minus97.31.5(97.3\pm 1.5)\%( 97.3 ± 1.5 ) %, respectively. To reduce the 137Xe (τ=5.5min𝜏5.5min\tau=5.5\,{\rm min}italic_τ = 5.5 roman_min, Q=4.17MeV𝑄4.17MeVQ=4.17\,{\rm MeV}italic_Q = 4.17 roman_MeV) background, we remove events reconstructed within 1.6 m for 27 min of vertices identified as neutron captures on 136Xe, which produce high energy γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ’s (Q=4.03MeV𝑄4.03MeVQ=4.03\,{\rm MeV}italic_Q = 4.03 roman_MeV). This cut removes (74±7)%percentplus-or-minus747(74\pm 7)\%( 74 ± 7 ) % of 137Xe.

The products of muon spallation with lifetimes greater than 𝒪𝒪\mathcal{O}caligraphic_O(100 s), denoted as “long-lived products”, are attributed to the decay of heavy isotopes produced by xenon spallation. Xenon spallation can be tagged by detecting multiple neutrons. To characterize the long-lived products, we define a likelihood ratio, RL=Lspa/(Lspa+Lacc)subscript𝑅𝐿subscript𝐿spasubscript𝐿spasubscript𝐿accR_{L}=L_{\rm spa}/(L_{\rm spa}+L_{\rm acc})italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_spa end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_spa end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_acc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). Here Lspasubscript𝐿spaL_{\rm spa}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_spa end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Laccsubscript𝐿accL_{\rm acc}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_acc end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the probability density functions (PDFs) for long-lived muon-spallation pairs and accidental pairs, respectively. These PDFs are constructed as a function of neutron multiplicity, distance to neutron vertices, and time interval from preceding muons. The cut value on RLsubscript𝑅𝐿R_{L}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is optimized using an estimate with MC simulation tools. FLUKA BOHLEN2014211 ; Ferrari:898301 is used to calculate the spallation isotope yields, and Geant4 to calculate the radioactive decays and energy spectra of the isotopes, considering their sequential decay chain. The predicted backgrounds are primarily from 132I, 130I, 124I, 122I, 118Sb, 110In, 88Y, and from other isotopes in smaller amounts (Table IX in Ref. Abe2023b ). The total background rate in the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β window is 30.0±2.2plus-or-minus30.02.230.0\pm 2.230.0 ± 2.2 (ton yr)-1 in total, in units of 136Xe exposure. Events that are not classified as coming from long-lived backgrounds are referred to as “singles data” (SD), and the others are referred to as “long-lived data” (LD).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Energy spectra of selected ββ𝛽𝛽\beta\betaitalic_β italic_β candidates within a 1.57-m-radius spherical volume drawn together with best-fit backgrounds, the 2νββ2𝜈𝛽𝛽2\nu\beta\beta2 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay spectrum, and the 90% C.L. upper limit for 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay of (a) singles data (SD), and (b) long-lived data (LD). The LD exposure is about 10% of the SD exposure.

We improved the neutron identification for post-muon events to enhance the tagging efficiency of the long-lived backgrounds. We identify these neutrons with a second, deadtime-free electronics system, called MoGURA Abe2023b . Previously, the neutron vertex was reconstructed using only PMTs with normal gain. In this analysis, we added low gain PMTs to the photon counting, achieving an increase in the mean number of PMT hits from 181181181181 to 201201201201 for 2.225 MeV γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ’s from neutron capture, after subtracting afterpulse noise contributions. The resulting neutron tagging efficiency is estimated to be (74.5±0.4)%percentplus-or-minus74.50.4(74.5\pm 0.4)\%( 74.5 ± 0.4 ) % based on the neutron capture time distribution, approximately 2% better than in the previous analysis. Our MC study shows that (47.1±8.7)%percentplus-or-minus47.18.7(47.1\pm 8.7)\%( 47.1 ± 8.7 ) % of long-lived spallation backgrounds are classified as LD, whereas only 9.09.09.09.0% of uncorrelated events are mis-classified.

The total livetime for SD and LD in KamLAND-Zen 800 is 1131113111311131 days and 111111111111 days, respectively. The total exposure of SD, which is sensitive to the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β signal, is 2097209720972097 kg yr of 136Xe, more than double the amount of the previous search Abe2023a . The 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay rate is estimated from a simultaneous likelihood fit to the binned energy spectra of SD and LD between 0.5 and 4.8 MeV. The binned energy spectra are made by dividing the 2.5-m-radius fiducial volume into 40 equal-volume bins (illustrated in Fig. 1), considering the time variation of event rates. The contributions from major backgrounds in the Xe-LS, such as 85Kr, 40K, 210Bi, the 228Th-208Pb subchain of the 232Th series, and long-lived spallation products, are free parameters and are left unconstrained in the spectral fit. The contributions from the 222Rn-210Pb subchain of the 238U series and short-lived spallation products are constrained by their independent measurements. The parameters of the detector energy response model are constrained by 214Bi data. The energy spectral distortion parameter (a linear rescaling) for the long-lived spallation products is constrained by its estimated uncertainty (Fig. 10 in Ref. Abe2023b ).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Allowed region for the 136Xe 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β rate and the long-lived spallation background rate in the energy region 2.35<E<2.70MeV2.35𝐸2.70MeV2.35<E<2.70\,{\rm MeV}2.35 < italic_E < 2.70 roman_MeV (0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β window). The red dot and contour lines correspond, respectively, to the best-fit and the 1σ1𝜎1\sigma1 italic_σ, 90%, 95%, 99% C.L. intervals for two degrees of freedom. The horizontal line indicates the MC-based prediction.

Figure 2 shows the energy spectra of selected candidate SD and LD events within a 1.57-m-radius spherical volume together with the best-fit curves. The exposure of 136Xe for SD in this reduced volume is 1.13 ton yr. The best-fit background contributions are summarized in Table 1. The 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β signal best-fit is 0 events, indicating no event excess over the background expectation. We obtain a 90% confidence level (C.L.) upper limit on the number of 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decays of <<<10.010.010.010.0 events (<<<8.08.08.08.0 events in the range 2.35<E<2.70MeV2.35𝐸2.70MeV2.35<E<2.70\,{\rm MeV}2.35 < italic_E < 2.70 roman_MeV), which corresponds to a limit of <<<8.98.98.98.9 (ton yr)-1 in units of 136Xe exposure, or T1/20νββ>3.4×1026superscriptsubscript𝑇120𝜈𝛽𝛽3.4superscript1026T_{1/2}^{0\nu\beta\beta}>3.4\times 10^{26}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 3.4 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT yr (90% C.L.). An analysis based on the Feldman-Cousins procedure PhysRevD.57.3873_FCmethod gives a slightly stronger limit of 4.3×10264.3superscript10264.3\times 10^{26}4.3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT yr (90% C.L.), indicating a limited impact of the physical boundary on the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β rate at low statistics. An MC simulation of an ensemble of experiments assuming the best-fit background spectrum rwithout a 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β signal indicates a median sensitivity of 2.3×10262.3superscript10262.3\times 10^{26}2.3 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT yr. The probability of obtaining a limit stronger than that reported here is 24%. In addition to the frequentist analyses above, we also performed a statistical analysis within the Bayesian framework, assuming a flat prior for 1/T1/20νββ1superscriptsubscript𝑇120𝜈𝛽𝛽1/T_{1/2}^{0\nu\beta\beta}1 / italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The Bayesian limit and median sensitivity are 3.4×10263.4superscript10263.4\times 10^{26}3.4 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT yr and 2.4×10262.4superscript10262.4\times 10^{26}2.4 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT yr (90% C.L.), respectively.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Effective Majorana neutrino mass mββdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽\left<m_{\beta\beta}\right>⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ as a function of the lightest neutrino mass mlightestsubscript𝑚lightestm_{\rm lightest}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_lightest end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The dark shaded regions are predictions based on best-fit values of neutrino oscillation parameters for (a) the normal ordering (NO) and (b) the inverted ordering (IO), and the light shaded regions indicate the 3σ3𝜎3\sigma3 italic_σ ranges calculated from oscillation parameter uncertainties DellOro2014 ; NuFIT2020 . The horizontal lines indicate 90% C.L. upper limits on mββdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽\left<m_{\beta\beta}\right>⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ with 136Xe from KamLAND-Zen (this work), considering an improved phase space factor calculation Kotila2012 ; Stoica2013 and phenomenological NME calculations: shell model Menendez2018 ; PhysRevC.93.024308horoi ; PhysRevC.101.044315.coraggio2020 ; PhysRevC.105.034312.coraggio2022 (dot-dashed lines), quasiparticle randomphase approximation (QRPA) PhysRevC.87.064302.mustonen ; PhysRevC.91.024613.Hyv ; PhysRevC.98.064325.simko2018 ; PhysRevC.97.045503fang ; PhysRevC.102.044303terasaki (dotted lines), energy-density functional (EDF) theory PhysRevLett.105.252503.rodriguez ; PhysRevLett.111.142501lopez ; PhysRevC.95.024305song (solid lines), interacting boson model (IBM) PhysRevC.91.034304barea ; PhysRevD.102.095016deppisch (dashed lines). (c) The corresponding limits for 136Xe, 76Ge Agostini2020 , and 130Te Adams2022 . Three theoretical predictions in the IO region are also shown: (A)Harigaya2012 , (B)Asaka2020 , (C)Asai2020 .
Table 1: Summary of the estimated and best-fit background contributions in the energy region 2.35<E<2.70MeV2.35𝐸2.70MeV2.35<E<2.70\,{\rm MeV}2.35 < italic_E < 2.70 roman_MeV within the 1.57-m-radius spherical volume. In total, 59595959 events were observed.

[h] Background        Estimated       Best-fit 136Xe 2νββ2𝜈𝛽𝛽2\nu\beta\beta2 italic_ν italic_β italic_β - 27.6027.6027.6027.60 Residual radioactivity in Xe-LS 238U series 0.08±0.01plus-or-minus0.080.010.08\pm 0.010.08 ± 0.01 0.080.080.080.08 232Th series - 1.351.351.351.35 External (Radioactivity in IB) 238U series - 6.616.616.616.61 232Th series - 0.040.040.040.04 Neutrino interactions 8B solar ν𝜈\nuitalic_ν esuperscript𝑒e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ES 3.57±0.09plus-or-minus3.570.093.57\pm 0.093.57 ± 0.09 3.573.573.573.57 Spallation products Long-lived 17.82±1.30plus-or-minus17.821.3017.82\pm 1.3017.82 ± 1.30 \dagger 19.3919.3919.3919.39 10C 0.00±0.05plus-or-minus0.000.050.00\pm 0.050.00 ± 0.05 0.000.000.000.00 6He 0.54±0.27plus-or-minus0.540.270.54\pm 0.270.54 ± 0.27 0.560.560.560.56 137Xe 0.72±0.60plus-or-minus0.720.600.72\pm 0.600.72 ± 0.60 0.720.720.720.72

  • \dagger

    Estimation based on the spallation MC study. This event rate constraint is not applied in the spectral fit.

Figure 3 shows the allowed region of the 136Xe 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β rate and the long-lived spallation background rate from a combined fit of the KamLAND-Zen 400 and 800 datasets, giving a limit of

T1/20νββ>3.8×1026yr   (90% C.L.).superscriptsubscript𝑇120𝜈𝛽𝛽3.8superscript1026yr   (90% C.L.)T_{1/2}^{0\nu\beta\beta}>3.8\times 10^{26}\,\textrm{yr~{}~{}~{}(90\% C.L.)}.italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 3.8 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT yr (90% C.L.) . (1)

The best-fit long-lived spallation background rate is 30.2±4.5plus-or-minus30.24.530.2\pm 4.530.2 ± 4.5 (ton yr)-1indicating good consistency between the MC-based prediction and the LD analysis. This combined analysis has a sensitivity of 2.6×10262.6superscript10262.6\times 10^{26}2.6 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 26 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT yr, and the probability of obtaining a stronger limit is 29292929%. The lower limit on T1/20νββsuperscriptsubscript𝑇120𝜈𝛽𝛽T_{1/2}^{0\nu\beta\beta}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT can be converted to an upper limit on mββdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ assuming that the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay mechanism is dominated by exchange of light Majorana neutrinos. Assuming the axial coupling constant gA1.27similar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑔𝐴1.27g_{A}\simeq 1.27italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 1.27, we obtain an upper limit of

mββ<(28122)meV   (90% C.L.),delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽28122meV   (90% C.L.)\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle<(28-122)\,\textrm{meV~{}~{}~{}(90\% C.L.)},⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ < ( 28 - 122 ) meV (90% C.L.) , (2)

using an improved phase space factor calculation of 14.54×1015(yr)114.54superscript1015superscriptyr114.54\times 10^{-15}\,(\textrm{yr})^{-1}14.54 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 15 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( yr ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Kotila2012 ; Stoica2013 , and phenomenological nuclear matrix element (NME) calculations, summarized in Table 2. In this letter, we follow the current standard to use those phenomenological models, although recent theoretical work has produced new NME calculations belley2023ab ; Jokiniemi2023 incorporating both quenching physics Faessler_2008 ; PhysRevC.87.014315 and short-range contact PhysRevLett.120.202001 contributions, which are missing in the calculations in Table 2. Considering the calculations from Ref. belley2023ab ; Jokiniemi2023 gives ranges of upper limits on mββdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ of 711257112571-12571 - 125 meV (ab initio belley2023ab ), 2560256025-6025 - 60 meV (pnQRPA Jokiniemi2023 ), and 441384413844-13844 - 138 meV (shell model Jokiniemi2023 ). Figure 4 illustrates the allowed range of mββdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ as a function of the lightest neutrino mass for the NME values in Table 2. The shaded regions include the uncertainties in mixing elements Ueisubscript𝑈𝑒𝑖U_{ei}italic_U start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the neutrino mass splitting for each hierarchy. Also drawn are experimental limits from 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay searches in other nuclei Agostini2020 ; Adams2022 . The limit using 136Xe by KamLAND-Zen has provided the most stringent tests of the effective Majorana mass in the IO region and several theoretical models Harigaya2012 ; Asaka2020 ; Asai2020 . It also provides the strongest constraint on mlightestsubscript𝑚lightestm_{\rm lightest}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_lightest end_POSTSUBSCRIPT considering extreme cases of the combination of CP phases and the uncertainties from neutrino oscillation parameters DellOro2014 ; NuFIT2020 . We obtain a 90% C.L. upper limit of mlightest<(84353)meVsubscript𝑚lightest84353meVm_{\rm lightest}<(84-353)\,{\rm meV}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_lightest end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < ( 84 - 353 ) roman_meV.

In conclusion, we presented a 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay search with the complete KamLAND-Zen dataset including improvements in the rejection of muon-induced long-lived spallation backgrounds. This search places the most stringent constraints to date on mββdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽\left<m_{\beta\beta}\right>⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩, and reaches the inverted mass ordering region below 50 meV with half of the phenomenological nuclear matrix element calculations. The sensitivity is limited by background from xenon spallation products and 2νββ2𝜈𝛽𝛽2\nu\beta\beta2 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay. In the near future, we plan to upgrade the KamLAND detector with more 136Xe mass, enhanced energy resolution to minimize the leakage of the 2νββ2𝜈𝛽𝛽2\nu\beta\beta2 italic_ν italic_β italic_β tail into the 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β analysis window, and enhanced rejection of spallation products through improved neutron tagging and particle identification methods.

Table 2: Summary of commonly used phenomenological nuclear matrix elements (M0νsuperscript𝑀0𝜈M^{0\nu}italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) for 136Xe 0νββ0𝜈𝛽𝛽0\nu\beta\beta0 italic_ν italic_β italic_β decay and the corresponding 90% C.L. upper limits on the effective Majorana neutrino mass mββdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽\left<m_{\beta\beta}\right>⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ from KamLAND-Zen data. The limits shown in Eq. (2) use the minimum and maximum.
     Ref.    M0νsuperscript𝑀0𝜈M^{0\nu}italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT    mββdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑚𝛽𝛽\langle m_{\beta\beta}\rangle⟨ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ (meV)
Shell model Menendez2018 2.28, 2.45 59.4, 55.3
PhysRevC.93.024308horoi 1.63, 1.76 83.1, 77.0
PhysRevC.101.044315.coraggio2020 ; PhysRevC.105.034312.coraggio2022 2.39 56.7
QRPA PhysRevC.87.064302.mustonen 1.55 87.4
PhysRevC.91.024613.Hyv 2.91 46.6
PhysRevC.98.064325.simko2018 2.71 50.0
PhysRevC.97.045503fang 1.11, 1.18 122, 115
PhysRevC.102.044303terasaki 3.38 40.1
EDF theory PhysRevLett.105.252503.rodriguez 4.20 32.3
PhysRevLett.111.142501lopez 4.77 28.4
PhysRevC.95.024305song 4.24 32.0
IBM PhysRevC.91.034304barea 3.25 41.7
PhysRevD.102.095016deppisch 3.40 39.9
Acknowledgements.
The KamLAND-Zen experiment is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grants No. 21000001, No. 26104002, and No. 19H05803; the U.S. National Science Foundation awards no. 2110720 and no. 2012964; the Heising-Simons Foundation; the Dutch Research Council (NWO); and under the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Grant No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, as well as other DOE and NSF grants to individual institutions. The Kamioka Mining and Smelting Company has provided service for activities in the mine. We acknowledge the support of NII for SINET4.

References

  • (1) M. Agostini, G. Benato, J. A. Detwiler, J. Menéndez, and F. Vissani, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 025002 (2023).
  • (2) M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  • (3) S. Abe et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 051801 (2023).
  • (4) K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 86, 013002 (2012).
  • (5) T. Asaka, Y. Heo, and T. Yoshida, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135956 (2020).
  • (6) K. Asai, The European Physical Journal C 80, 76 (2020).
  • (7) M. Agostini, G. Benato, and J. A. Detwiler, Phys. Rev. D 96, 053001 (2017).
  • (8) A. Gando et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 85, 045504 (2012).
  • (9) A. Gando et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 86, 021601 (2012).
  • (10) A. Gando et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 062502 (2013).
  • (11) K. Asakura et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A 946, 171 (2016).
  • (12) A. Gando et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082503 (2016).
  • (13) A. Gando et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 192501 (2019).
  • (14) Y. Gando et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), JINST 16, P08023 (2021).
  • (15) M. Redshaw, E. Wingfield, J. McDaniel, and E. G. Myers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 053003 (2007).
  • (16) S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003).
  • (17) J. Allison et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
  • (18) A. Li et al., Phys. Rev. C 107, 014323 (2023).
  • (19) A. M. Serenelli, W. C. Haxton, and C. Peña-Garay, Astrophys. J. 743, 24 (2011).
  • (20) H. Ejiri and S. R. Elliott, Phys. Rev. C 89, 055501 (2014).
  • (21) D. Frekers, P. Puppe, J. H. Thies, and H. Ejiri, Nucl. Phys. A 916, 219 (2013).
  • (22) S. W. Li and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. C 89, 045801 (2014).
  • (23) S. W. Li and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 91, 105005 (2015).
  • (24) S. W. Li and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 92, 105033 (2015).
  • (25) Y. Zhang et al., (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 012004 (2016).
  • (26) S. Abe et al., (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 107, 054612 (2023).
  • (27) T. Böhlen et al., Nuclear Data Sheets 120, 211 (2014).
  • (28) A. Ferrari and et al., FLUKA: A multi-particle transport code (program version 2005) CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs (CERN, Geneva, 2005).
  • (29) G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873 (1998).
  • (30) S. Dell’Oro, S. Marcocci, and F. Vissani, Phys. Rev. D 90, 033005 (2014).
  • (31) Nufit 5.0, available at http://www.nu-fit.org (2020).
  • (32) J. Kotila and F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. C 85, 034316 (2012).
  • (33) S. Stoica and M. Mirea, Phys. Rev. C 88, 037303 (2013); updated in arXiv:1411.5506v3 .
  • (34) J. Menéndez, J. of Phys. G 45, 014003 (2018).
  • (35) M. Horoi and A. Neacsu, Phys. Rev. C 93, 024308 (2016).
  • (36) L. Coraggio, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, R. Mancino, and F. Nowacki, Phys. Rev. C 101, 044315 (2020).
  • (37) L. Coraggio et al., Phys. Rev. C 105, 034312 (2022).
  • (38) M. T. Mustonen and J. Engel, Phys. Rev. C 87, 064302 (2013).
  • (39) J. Hyvärinen and J. Suhonen, Phys. Rev. C 91, 024613 (2015).
  • (40) F. S̆imkovic, A. Smetana, and P. Vogel, Phys. Rev. C 98, 064325 (2018).
  • (41) D.-L. Fang, A. Faessler, and F. S̆imkovic, Phys. Rev. C 97, 045503 (2018).
  • (42) J. Terasaki, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044303 (2020).
  • (43) T. R. Rodríguez and G. Martínez-Pinedo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252503 (2010).
  • (44) N. L. Vaquero, T. R. Rodríguez, and J. L. Egido, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 142501 (2013).
  • (45) L. S. Song, J. M. Yao, P. Ring, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 95, 024305 (2017).
  • (46) J. Barea, J. Kotila, and F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. C 91, 034304 (2015).
  • (47) F. F. Deppisch, L. Graf, F. Iachello, and J. Kotila, Phys. Rev. D 102, 095016 (2020).
  • (48) M. Agostini et al., (GERDA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 252502 (2020).
  • (49) D. Q. Adams et al., (CUORE Collaboration), Nature 604, 53 (2022).
  • (50) A. Belley, T. Miyagi, S. R. Stroberg, and J. D. Holt, arXiv:2307.15156v1.
  • (51) L. Jokiniemi, B. Romeo, P. Soriano, and J. Menéndez, Phys. Rev. C 107, 044305 (2023).
  • (52) A. Faessler et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35, 075104 (2008).
  • (53) J. Barea, J. Kotila, and F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. C 87, 014315 (2013).
  • (54) V. Cirigliano et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 202001 (2018).