thanks: These authors contributed equally to this workthanks: These authors contributed equally to this work

Planar Hall Plateau in Magnetic Weyl Semimetals

Lei Li Centre for Quantum Physics, Key Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Quantum Architecture and Measurement (MOE), School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China Bei**g Key Lab of Nanophotonics & Ultrafine Optoelectronic Systems, School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China    Chaoxi Cui Centre for Quantum Physics, Key Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Quantum Architecture and Measurement (MOE), School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China Bei**g Key Lab of Nanophotonics & Ultrafine Optoelectronic Systems, School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China    Run-Wu Zhang Centre for Quantum Physics, Key Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Quantum Architecture and Measurement (MOE), School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China Bei**g Key Lab of Nanophotonics & Ultrafine Optoelectronic Systems, School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China    Zhi-Ming Yu [email protected] Centre for Quantum Physics, Key Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Quantum Architecture and Measurement (MOE), School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China Bei**g Key Lab of Nanophotonics & Ultrafine Optoelectronic Systems, School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China International Center for Quantum Materials, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Zhuhai, 519000, China    Yugui Yao [email protected] Centre for Quantum Physics, Key Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Quantum Architecture and Measurement (MOE), School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China Bei**g Key Lab of Nanophotonics & Ultrafine Optoelectronic Systems, School of Physics, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Bei**g, 100081, China International Center for Quantum Materials, Bei**g Institute of Technology, Zhuhai, 519000, China
Abstract

Despite the rapid progress in the study of planar Hall effect (PHE) in recent years, all the previous works only showed that the PHE is connected to local geometric quantities, such as Berry curvature. Here, for the first time, we point out that the PHE in magnetic Weyl semimetals is directly related to a global quantity, namely, the Chern number of the Weyl point. This leads to a remarkable consequence that the PHE observation predicted here is robust against many system details, including the Fermi energy. The main difference between non-magnetic and magnetic Weyl points is that the latter breaks time-reversal symmetry 𝒯𝒯{\cal{T}}caligraphic_T, thus generally possessing an energy tilt. Via semiclassical Boltzmann theory, we investigate the PHE in generic magnetic Weyl models with energy tilt and arbitrary Chern number. We find that by aligning the magnetic and electric fields in the same direction, the trace of the PHE conductivity contributed from Berry curvature and orbital moment is proportional to the Chern number and the energy tilt of the Weyl points, resulting in previously undiscovered quantized PHE plateau by varying Fermi energy. We further confirm the existence of PHE plateaus in a more realistic lattice model without 𝒯𝒯{\cal{T}}caligraphic_T symmetry. By proposing a new quantized physical quantity, our work not only provides a new tool for extracting the topological character of the Weyl points but also suggests that the interplay between topology and magnetism can give rise to intriguing physics.

Introduction.— The band topology, referring to the topological properties of the electronic band structure of materials, have attracted considerable attention in the field of condensed matter physics [1, 2]. Generally, one can utilize the geometric quantities, which are locally defined at each momentum point in the Brillouin zone (BZ), to describe it. Some common geometric quantities include Berry curvature and its dipole [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], Berry-connection polarizability and its dipole [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13], and quantum metric [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. However, the essential aspect of topological states is that they host (at least) a global quantity, i.e. topological charge [19, 20, 21, 22, 23], which also is used to characterize and distinguish topological states. For example, the integral of the Berry curvature over a 2D closed surface in momentum space may result in Chern number [24]. More importantly, in stark contrast to local geometric quantities and general physical observations, global topological quantities are integers and are robust to many material details [25, 26].

Recently, various Hall effects, including nonlinear Hall effects [27, 8, 9, 28, 29, 30, 10, 31, 11, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44] and many kinds of planar Hall effect (PHE) [45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56], have been proposed and demonstrated to have a close relationship with geometric quantities. Since the geometric quantities are significantly enhanced around band degeneracies, these unconventional Hall effects are widely investigated in topological semimetals [57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66]. As aforementioned, the existence of a global quantity rather than local geometric quantities is the most remarkable feature of topological states. Unfortunately, the PHEs have not yet been reported to be associated with a global quantity.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Sketch of PHE in topological Weyl semimetals with magnetic and electric fields aligned in the same direction. In this case, the trace of the PHE conductivity Tr[χi]=jχi;jjTrdelimited-[]subscript𝜒𝑖subscript𝑗subscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}]=\sum_{j}\chi_{i;jj}roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is in direct proportion to the Chern number of the WP, and is robust against many system details, leading to a flat plateau at low energy.

In this work, we show that the PHE in magnetic Weyl semimetals is directly linked to the topological charge (Chern number) of the Weyl point. In PHE, the magnetic field, the driving electric field, and the transverse Hall current are in the same plane [58, 67], as illustrated in Fig. 1, which is completely different from the setup in ordinary Hall effect. Initially, PHE was attributed to system anisotropy [45]. Subsequent findings unveiled that the Berry curvature also affects PHE, leading to a surge in research on PHE in topological Weyl semimetals [68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75]. Recently, Li et al. [67] found that the PHE resulting from orbital moment is comparable with that from Berry curvature. However, a common observation is that the PHE mechanisms in these studies are independent of any global quantity.

Here, based on semiclassical Boltzmann theory, we investigate PHE in the charge-n𝑛nitalic_n (with n𝑛nitalic_n an integer) Weyl points (C-n𝑛nitalic_n WPs) with energy tilt, which is a common feature for magnetic WPs. For magnetic WPs, the leading order of PHE generally is linear due to the breaking of time reversal symmetry (𝒯𝒯{\cal{T}}caligraphic_T) [67]. The linear PHE conductivity contains six terms, with one term contributed by Lorentz force and the remaining terms originating from geometric quantities, i.e. Berry curvature and orbital moment. Remarkably, by aligning the magnetic and electric fields in the same direction (see Fig. 1), we demonstrate that the trace of the PHE conductivity contributed by Berry curvature and orbital moment (Tr[χisubscript𝜒𝑖\chi_{i}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT] with i=x,y,z𝑖𝑥𝑦𝑧i=x,y,zitalic_i = italic_x , italic_y , italic_z) is quantized for all the C-n𝑛nitalic_n WPs resulting from the global topology of the WP, and then is robust against many material details. The analytical derivation of Tr[χisubscript𝜒𝑖\chi_{i}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT] shows that the Tr[χisubscript𝜒𝑖\chi_{i}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT] is fully determined by the Chern number and the energy tilt of the WPs. This feature becomes increasingly more precise when the Fermi energy approaches the WPs. By unveiling a novel magnetotransport phenomenon directly related to the global quantities of WP in magnetic Weyl semimetals, our work deepens the understanding on the PHE, and provides a promising method to detect the topological charge and the energy tilt of the WPs.

Linear PHE conductivity.— Generally, the PHE conductivity under weak fields can be obtained from semiclassical equations of motion [1] and the Boltzmann transport equation [76]. Here, we focus on the setup that the driving electric field 𝑬𝑬\bm{E}bold_italic_E and the magnetic field 𝑩𝑩\bm{B}bold_italic_B are aligned in the same direction, i.e.𝑬𝑩conditional𝑬𝑩{\bm{E}}\|{\bm{B}}bold_italic_E ∥ bold_italic_B (see Fig. 1). For the three-dimensional magnetic systems, the leading terms of the PHE that have topological origin are linearly dependent on both 𝑬𝑬\bm{E}bold_italic_E and 𝑩𝑩\bm{B}bold_italic_B, expressed as [67]

Ji=χi;jjBjEj,subscript𝐽𝑖subscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗subscript𝐵𝑗subscript𝐸𝑗\displaystyle J_{i}=\chi_{i;jj}B_{j}E_{j},italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (1)

where 𝑱𝑱\bm{J}bold_italic_J is the current density and χi;jjsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗\chi_{i;jj}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denotes the PHE conductivity. The PHE conductivity χi;jksubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑘\chi_{i;jk}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is a third-order tensor, and the χi;jjsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗\chi_{i;jj}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Eq. (1) denotes a diagonal element of the matrix χisubscript𝜒𝑖\chi_{i}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. χi;jjsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗\chi_{i;jj}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be further decomposed into the following five parts [67]:

χi;jj=χi;jj(1)+χi;jj(2)+χi;jj(3)+χi;jj(4)+χi;jj(5),subscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗1superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗2superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗3superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗4superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗5\displaystyle\chi_{i;jj}=\chi_{i;jj}^{(1)}+\chi_{i;jj}^{(2)}+\chi_{i;jj}^{(3)}% +\chi_{i;jj}^{(4)}+\chi_{i;jj}^{(5)},italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 5 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (2)

with

χi;jj(1)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗1\displaystyle\chi_{i;jj}^{(1)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== e3τ[d𝒌]vivjΩjεfk0,superscript𝑒3𝜏delimited-[]𝑑𝒌subscript𝑣𝑖subscript𝑣𝑗subscriptΩ𝑗subscript𝜀superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑘0\displaystyle-e^{3}\tau\int[d\bm{k}]v_{i}v_{j}\Omega_{j}\partial_{\varepsilon}% f_{k}^{0},- italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ ∫ [ italic_d bold_italic_k ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,
χi;jj(2)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗2\displaystyle\chi_{i;jj}^{(2)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== e3τ[d𝒌]vj(𝒗𝛀)εfk0,superscript𝑒3𝜏delimited-[]𝑑𝒌subscript𝑣𝑗𝒗𝛀subscript𝜀superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑘0\displaystyle e^{3}\tau\int[d\bm{k}]v_{j}\left(\bm{v}\cdot\bm{\Omega}\right)% \partial_{\varepsilon}f_{k}^{0},italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ ∫ [ italic_d bold_italic_k ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_v ⋅ bold_Ω ) ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,
χi;jj(3)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗3\displaystyle\chi_{i;jj}^{(3)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== e3τ[d𝒌]vi(𝒗𝛀)εfk0,superscript𝑒3𝜏delimited-[]𝑑𝒌subscript𝑣𝑖𝒗𝛀subscript𝜀superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑘0\displaystyle e^{3}\tau\int[d\bm{k}]v_{i}\left(\bm{v}\cdot\bm{\Omega}\right)% \partial_{\varepsilon}f_{k}^{0},italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ ∫ [ italic_d bold_italic_k ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_v ⋅ bold_Ω ) ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,
χi;jj(4)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗4\displaystyle\chi_{i;jj}^{(4)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== e2τ[d𝒌]vikjmjεfk0,superscript𝑒2𝜏delimited-[]𝑑𝒌subscript𝑣𝑖subscriptsubscript𝑘𝑗subscript𝑚𝑗subscript𝜀superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑘0\displaystyle-e^{2}\tau\int[d\bm{k}]v_{i}\partial_{k_{j}}m_{j}\partial_{% \varepsilon}f_{k}^{0},- italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ ∫ [ italic_d bold_italic_k ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ,
χi;jj(5)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗5\displaystyle\chi_{i;jj}^{(5)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 5 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =\displaystyle== e2τ[d𝒌]vjkimjεfk0.superscript𝑒2𝜏delimited-[]𝑑𝒌subscript𝑣𝑗subscriptsubscript𝑘𝑖subscript𝑚𝑗subscript𝜀superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑘0\displaystyle-e^{2}\tau\int[d\bm{k}]v_{j}\partial_{k_{i}}m_{j}\partial_{% \varepsilon}f_{k}^{0}.- italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ ∫ [ italic_d bold_italic_k ] italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (3)

Here, [d𝒌]1(2π)3d3kdelimited-[]𝑑𝒌1superscript2𝜋3Planck-constant-over-2-pisuperscript𝑑3𝑘\int[d\bm{k}]\equiv-\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3}\hbar}\int d^{3}k∫ [ italic_d bold_italic_k ] ≡ - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ end_ARG ∫ italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k, ε𝜀\varepsilonitalic_ε is the band energy, 𝒗=𝒌ε/𝒗subscript𝒌𝜀Planck-constant-over-2-pi\bm{v}=\partial_{\bm{k}}\varepsilon/\hbarbold_italic_v = ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε / roman_ℏ denotes the velocity, 𝛀𝛀\bm{\Omega}bold_Ω and 𝒎𝒎\bm{m}bold_italic_m respectively are the Berry curvature and the orbital moment, τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ is the relaxation time, and fk0superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑘0f_{k}^{0}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the Fermi-Dirac distribution. The electron charge is taken as e𝑒-e- italic_e (i.e., , e>0𝑒0e>0italic_e > 0).

An analysis of Eq. (Planar Hall Plateau in Magnetic Weyl Semimetals) reveals two crucial features of the topological PHE conductivities χi;jjsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗\chi_{i;jj}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. First, all the five PHE conductivities linearly depend on τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ. Thus, they can be easily extracted in experiments [77, 78], as the contributions from intrinsic Hall effect and Lorentz force are even functions of τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ [67]. This linear dependence also indicates that the topological PHE conductivities only appear in the magnetic systems, as 𝒯𝒯{\cal{T}}caligraphic_T reverses 𝑱𝑱{\bm{J}}bold_italic_J, 𝑩𝑩{\bm{B}}bold_italic_B and τ𝜏\tauitalic_τ, but keeps 𝑬𝑬{\bm{E}}bold_italic_E invariant.

Second, one observes that the trace of the matrix χi(1)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖1\chi_{i}^{(1)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT equals to χi;jj(3)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗3-\chi_{i;jj}^{(3)}- italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, i.e.Tr[χi(1)]=jχi;jj(1)=χi;jj(3)Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖1subscript𝑗superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗1superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗3{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(1)}]=\sum_{j}\chi_{i;jj}^{(1)}=-\chi_{i;jj}^{(3)}roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and Tr[χi(3)]=3χi;jj(3)Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖33superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗3{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(3)}]=3\chi_{i;jj}^{(3)}roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = 3 italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Thus, the trace of χisubscript𝜒𝑖\chi_{i}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is

Tr[χi]jχi;jj=Tr[χi(2)+23χi(3)+χi(4)+χi(5)],Trdelimited-[]subscript𝜒𝑖subscript𝑗subscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖223superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖3superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖4superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖5\displaystyle{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}]\equiv\sum_{j}\chi_{i;jj}={\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(2% )}+\frac{2}{3}\chi_{i}^{(3)}+\chi_{i}^{(4)}+\chi_{i}^{(5)}],roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] ≡ ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 5 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] , (4)

in which the contribution from Berry curvature and orbital moment are Tr[χiΩ]=Tr[χi(2)+23χi(3)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖ΩTrdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖223superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖3{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{\Omega}]={\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(2)}+\frac{2}{3}\chi_{i}^{(3)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] and Tr[χim]=Tr[χi(4)+χi(5)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑚Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖4superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖5{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{m}]={\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(4)}+\chi_{i}^{(5)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 5 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ], respectively.

Third, the topological PHE conductivities χi;jjsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗\chi_{i;jj}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are determined by the properties of the Fermi surface, due to the presence of εfk0subscript𝜀superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑘0\partial_{\varepsilon}f_{k}^{0}∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. It has been demonstrated that the geometry quantities at the Fermi surface have a significant influence on the PHE conductivities [67, 68, 69]. However, the Fermi surface may also possess global quantities. The influence of the global quantities on the PHE conductivities has not been investigated. Since the most famous global quantity that may be hosted by a 2D Fermi surface is the Chern number (𝒞𝒞{\cal{C}}caligraphic_C), here we focus on the topological PHE conductivities χi;jjsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗\chi_{i;jj}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of generic magnetic WPs with different Chern numbers.

Linear WP and scaling analysis.— Before studying a generic Weyl model with arbitrary Chern number, it is instructive to begin with a conventional (linear) WP with |𝒞|=1𝒞1|{\cal{C}}|=1| caligraphic_C | = 1, which has a linear dispersion along all the directions in momentum space [79]. Due to the absence of 𝒯𝒯{\cal{T}}caligraphic_T symmetry, the magnetic WP generally has an energy tilt. For linear WP, the leading term for the energy tilt is also linear. Thus, a general Hamiltonian for the magnetic linear WP can be written as [79]

1=wxkx+v1𝒌𝝈,subscript1subscript𝑤𝑥subscript𝑘𝑥subscript𝑣1𝒌𝝈\displaystyle\mathcal{H}_{1}=w_{x}k_{x}+v_{1}\bm{k}\cdot\bm{\sigma},caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k ⋅ bold_italic_σ , (5)

with wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and v1subscript𝑣1v_{1}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the real parameters respectively representing the energy tilt and Fermi velocity of the WP, and σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ being the Pauli matrix. Here, without loss of generality, we have set the energy tilt to be along kxsubscript𝑘𝑥k_{x}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT direction. We also assume |wx|<|v1|subscript𝑤𝑥subscript𝑣1|w_{x}|<|v_{1}|| italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | < | italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | to guarantee the Fermi surface of the WP close [80, 81]. It is easy to know that this model (5) exhibits a linear dispersion and exhibits a Chern number 𝒞=Sign(v1)𝒞Signsubscript𝑣1{\cal{C}}={\rm Sign}(v_{1})caligraphic_C = roman_Sign ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Variation of PHE conductivity with (a) Fermi level EFsubscript𝐸𝐹E_{F}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and (b) Fermi velocity v1subscript𝑣1v_{1}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. In panel (a), the red and blue lines correspond to the χx;yy(3)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑥𝑦𝑦3\chi_{x;yy}^{(3)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x ; italic_y italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and χx;xx(4)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑥𝑥𝑥4\chi_{x;xx}^{(4)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x ; italic_x italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, respectively. Solid lines represent results for wx>0subscript𝑤𝑥0w_{x}>0italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 and dashed lines for wx<0subscript𝑤𝑥0w_{x}<0italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 0. We set |wx|=0.2eVÅsubscript𝑤𝑥0.2eVÅ|w_{x}|=0.2\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}| italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | = 0.2 eV ⋅ Å, and v1=1.0eVÅsubscript𝑣11.0eVÅv_{1}=1.0\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.0 eV ⋅ Å in (a), and set wx=0.2eVÅsubscript𝑤𝑥0.2eVÅw_{x}=0.2\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.2 eV ⋅ Å and EF=200meVsubscript𝐸𝐹200meVE_{F}=200~{}\rm{meV}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 200 roman_meV in (b). We also set τ=0.1ps𝜏0.1ps\tau=0.1~{}\rm{ps}italic_τ = 0.1 roman_ps in all calculations.

A striking feature of the system that exhibits same order of dispersion along all the directions is that its various important properties can be obtained by applying a simple scaling analysis [82]. For this model (5), we consider a scaling transformation in momentum and energy: 𝒌λ𝒌𝒌𝜆𝒌\bm{k}\rightarrow\lambda\bm{k}bold_italic_k → italic_λ bold_italic_k and EFλEFsubscript𝐸𝐹𝜆subscript𝐸𝐹E_{F}\rightarrow\lambda E_{F}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → italic_λ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ is a real number. Due to the linear feature of Eq. (5), one has 1(λ𝒌)=λ1(𝒌)subscript1𝜆𝒌𝜆subscript1𝒌{\cal{H}}_{1}(\lambda\bm{k})=\lambda{\cal{H}}_{1}(\bm{k})caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_λ bold_italic_k ) = italic_λ caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_italic_k ) and ε(λ𝒌)=λε(𝒌)𝜀𝜆𝒌𝜆𝜀𝒌\varepsilon(\lambda\bm{k})=\lambda\varepsilon(\bm{k})italic_ε ( italic_λ bold_italic_k ) = italic_λ italic_ε ( bold_italic_k ). Note that the velocity and the eigenstates of the system are invariant under the scaling, i.e.v(λ𝒌)=v(𝒌)𝑣𝜆𝒌𝑣𝒌v(\lambda\bm{k})=v(\bm{k})italic_v ( italic_λ bold_italic_k ) = italic_v ( bold_italic_k ) and |un,λ𝒌=|un,𝒌ketsubscript𝑢𝑛𝜆𝒌ketsubscript𝑢𝑛𝒌|u_{n,\lambda\bm{k}}\rangle=|u_{n,\bm{k}}\rangle| italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_λ bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ = | italic_u start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩. Then, the Berry curvature and orbital moment transform as 𝛀λ𝒌=λ2𝛀𝒌subscript𝛀𝜆𝒌superscript𝜆2subscript𝛀𝒌{\bm{\Omega}_{\lambda\bm{k}}}=\lambda^{-2}{\bm{\Omega}_{\bm{k}}}bold_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and 𝒎λ𝒌=λ1𝒎𝒌subscript𝒎𝜆𝒌superscript𝜆1subscript𝒎𝒌{\bm{m}}_{\lambda\bm{k}}=\lambda^{-1}{\bm{m}}_{\bm{k}}bold_italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT bold_italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, respectively.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Variation of PHE conductivity (a) Tr[χxΩ]Trdelimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝜒Ω𝑥\mathrm{Tr}[\chi^{\Omega}_{x}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] and (b) Tr[χxm]Trdelimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝜒𝑚𝑥\mathrm{Tr}[\chi^{m}_{x}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] with Fermi level for n=1,2,3𝑛123n=1,2,3italic_n = 1 , 2 , 3 when v1>0subscript𝑣10v_{1}>0italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0. The corresponding value of η𝜂\etaitalic_η and β𝛽\betaitalic_β in Table 1 are η=0.474SÅcm1eV1T1𝜂0.474SÅsuperscriptcm1superscripteV1superscriptT1\eta=0.474~{}\rm{S\cdot\AA\cdot cm^{-1}\cdot eV^{-1}\cdot T^{-1}}italic_η = 0.474 roman_S ⋅ roman_Å ⋅ roman_cm start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⋅ roman_eV start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⋅ roman_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and β=0.112𝛽0.112\beta=0.112italic_β = 0.112. (c) Variation of Tr[χxΩ]Trdelimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝜒Ω𝑥\mathrm{Tr}[\chi^{\Omega}_{x}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] and Tr[χxm]Trdelimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝜒𝑚𝑥\mathrm{Tr}[\chi^{m}_{x}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] with Fermi level for n=2𝑛2n=2italic_n = 2 when v1<0subscript𝑣10v_{1}<0italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 0. The corresponding β=0.143𝛽0.143\beta=0.143italic_β = 0.143. (d) Variation of Tr[χxΩ]Trdelimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝜒Ω𝑥\mathrm{Tr}[\chi^{\Omega}_{x}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] and Tr[χxm]Trdelimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝜒𝑚𝑥\mathrm{Tr}[\chi^{m}_{x}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] with energy tilt wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for n=3𝑛3n=3italic_n = 3 when v1>0subscript𝑣10v_{1}>0italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0. We set wx=0.5eVÅsubscript𝑤𝑥0.5eVÅw_{x}=0.5\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.5 eV ⋅ Å in (a-c), v1=1.0eVÅsubscript𝑣11.0eVÅv_{1}=1.0\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.0 eV ⋅ Å, c+=0.3eVÅnsubscript𝑐0.3eVsuperscriptÅ𝑛c_{+}=0.3\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}^{n}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3 eV ⋅ Å start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and c=1.2eVÅnsubscript𝑐1.2eVsuperscriptÅ𝑛c_{-}=1.2\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}^{n}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.2 eV ⋅ Å start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in (a), (b) and (d); v1=0.9eVÅsubscript𝑣10.9eVÅv_{1}=-0.9\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 0.9 eV ⋅ Å, c+=0.4eVÅnsubscript𝑐0.4eVsuperscriptÅ𝑛c_{+}=0.4\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}^{n}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.4 eV ⋅ Å start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and c=1.0eVÅnsubscript𝑐1.0eVsuperscriptÅ𝑛c_{-}=1.0\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}^{n}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.0 eV ⋅ Å start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in (c). We also set EF=200meVsubscript𝐸𝐹200meVE_{F}=200~{}\text{meV}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 200 meV in (d) and τ=0.1ps𝜏0.1ps\tau=0.1~{}\rm{ps}italic_τ = 0.1 roman_ps in all calculations.

As a consequence, for all the five PHE conductivities in Eq. (Planar Hall Plateau in Magnetic Weyl Semimetals), we have

χi;jj(l)(λEF)=χi;jj(l)(EF),superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗𝑙𝜆subscript𝐸𝐹superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗𝑙subscript𝐸𝐹\displaystyle\chi_{i;jj}^{(l)}(\lambda E_{F})=\chi_{i;jj}^{(l)}(E_{F}),italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_λ italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , (6)

indicating that the χi;jj(l)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗𝑙\chi_{i;jj}^{(l)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (l=1,,5𝑙15l=1,\cdots,5italic_l = 1 , ⋯ , 5) is a quantity that surprisingly has no dependence on Fermi energy, leading to a PHE plateau in energy space, as shown in Fig. 2(a). Further numerical calculations show that the trace of the PHE conductivity Tr[χi(l)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑙{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(l)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] is also robust to the absolute value of v1subscript𝑣1v_{1}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and is only dependent on its sign [see Fig. 2(b)], which is reminiscent of the Chern number of the WP 𝒞=Sign(v1)𝒞Signsubscript𝑣1{\cal{C}}={\rm Sign}(v_{1})caligraphic_C = roman_Sign ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). Notice that in the field of condensed matter physics, it is quite rare for an observable to have such a robust feature. All these results indicate that the PHE conductivity Tr[χi(l)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑙{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(l)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] in WP should be more nontrivial than previously understood. Besides, from symmetry analysis, one knows that the value of the PHE plateau would be reversed when the sign of wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is changed, as both wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and χi,jj(l)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗𝑙\chi_{i,jj}^{(l)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are anti-symmetric under 𝒯𝒯{\cal{T}}caligraphic_T symmetry. This is confirmed by our numerical calculations, as shown in Fig. 2(a).

Beyond linear model.— We then discuss the trace of PHE conductivity Tr[χi]Trdelimited-[]subscript𝜒𝑖{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] in a generic magnetic WP with arbitrary Chern number, for which the Hamiltonian reads [83, 84],

2=wxkx+[v1kxc+k+n+cknc+kn+ck+nv1kx],subscript2subscript𝑤𝑥subscript𝑘𝑥delimited-[]subscript𝑣1subscript𝑘𝑥subscript𝑐superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑛subscript𝑐superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑛subscript𝑐superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑛subscript𝑐superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑛subscript𝑣1subscript𝑘𝑥\displaystyle\mathcal{H}_{2}=w_{x}k_{x}+\left[\begin{array}[]{cc}v_{1}k_{x}&c_% {+}k_{+}^{n}+c_{-}k_{-}^{n}\\ c_{+}k_{-}^{n}+c_{-}k_{+}^{n}&-v_{1}k_{x}\end{array}\right],caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + [ start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL - italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY ] , (9)

with k±=ky±ikzsubscript𝑘plus-or-minusplus-or-minussubscript𝑘𝑦𝑖subscript𝑘𝑧k_{\pm}=k_{y}\pm ik_{z}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± italic_i italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, n𝑛nitalic_n an integer (which can be 1, 2, and 3 in crystals), and c±subscript𝑐plus-or-minusc_{\pm}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT a real parameter. The Chern number of this WP is 𝒞=n×Sign(v1)𝒞𝑛Signsubscript𝑣1{\cal{C}}=n\times{\rm Sign}(v_{1})caligraphic_C = italic_n × roman_Sign ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) for |c+|>|c|subscript𝑐subscript𝑐|c_{+}|>|c_{-}|| italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | > | italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | and is 𝒞=n×Sign(v1)𝒞𝑛Signsubscript𝑣1{\cal{C}}=-n\times{\rm Sign}(v_{1})caligraphic_C = - italic_n × roman_Sign ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) for |c+|<|c|subscript𝑐subscript𝑐|c_{+}|<|c_{-}|| italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | < | italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT |. Again, we require the WP to be a type-I point with |wx|<|v1|subscript𝑤𝑥subscript𝑣1|w_{x}|<|v_{1}|| italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | < | italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT |. For n1𝑛1n\neq 1italic_n ≠ 1, the WP has a linear dispersion along kxsubscript𝑘𝑥k_{x}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, but a nonlinear dispersion along other directions. Thus, it can not be investigated by scaling analysis.

The numerical results of Tr[χiΩ(m)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖Ω𝑚{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{\Omega(m)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω ( italic_m ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] based on Hamiltonian 2subscript2\mathcal{H}_{2}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (9) are presented in Fig. 3. A remarkable observation is that while χi,jjΩ(m)superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗Ω𝑚\chi_{i,jj}^{\Omega(m)}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω ( italic_m ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is no longer independent of Fermi energy, due to the loss of linear dispersion, the trace, i.e. Tr[χiΩ(m)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖Ω𝑚{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{\Omega(m)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω ( italic_m ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] remain robust against EFsubscript𝐸𝐹E_{F}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, as shown in Fig. 3(a-c). More than that, the plateau of Tr[χiΩ(m)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖Ω𝑚{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{\Omega(m)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω ( italic_m ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] is completely not effected by the nonlinear dispersion and the band anisotropy induced by the parameters c±subscript𝑐plus-or-minusc_{\pm}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (see Fig. 3). Again, we find that the PHE plateau is sensitive to the value of n𝑛nitalic_n and the sign of v1subscript𝑣1v_{1}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, i.e., the Chern number of the WP. Moreover, we find that Tr[χiΩ]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖Ω{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{\Omega}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] linearly depend on the energy tilt wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, while Tr[χim]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑚{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{m}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] shows a linear dependence on wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT when wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is small, but increasingly deviates it when wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases, as shown in Fig. 3(d). All these results strongly suggest that the trace of the PHE conductivity Tr[χiΩ(m)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖Ω𝑚{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{\Omega(m)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω ( italic_m ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] has a deeper physical origin beyond local geometric quantities.

Table 1: The PHE conductivity Tr[χi(l)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑙{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(l)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] of a generic WP model (9) where the energy tilt is along kxsubscript𝑘𝑥k_{x}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT direction. Here, 𝒞𝒞\mathcal{C}caligraphic_C is the Chern number of the WP, η=e3τ/(12π23)𝜂superscript𝑒3𝜏12superscript𝜋2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3\eta=e^{3}\tau/(12\pi^{2}\hbar^{3})italic_η = italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ / ( 12 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), and β=[2α3+3α+3(α21)arctanhα]/α3𝛽delimited-[]2superscript𝛼33𝛼3superscript𝛼21arctanh𝛼superscript𝛼3\beta=[-2\alpha^{3}+3\alpha+3(\alpha^{2}-1)\operatorname{arctanh}\alpha]/% \alpha^{3}italic_β = [ - 2 italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 3 italic_α + 3 ( italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 ) roman_arctanh italic_α ] / italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and α=|wx/v1|<1𝛼subscript𝑤𝑥subscript𝑣11\alpha=|w_{x}/v_{1}|<1italic_α = | italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | < 1 denote the absolute and relative energy tilt, respectively.
Berry curvature orbital moment
l𝑙litalic_l = 1 l𝑙litalic_l = 2 l𝑙litalic_l = 3 l𝑙litalic_l = 4 l𝑙litalic_l = 5
Tr[χx(l)]/ηTrdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑥𝑙𝜂{\rm Tr}[\chi_{x}^{(l)}]/\etaroman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] / italic_η 3wx𝒞3subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞-3w_{x}\mathcal{C}- 3 italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C 3wx𝒞3subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞3w_{x}\mathcal{C}3 italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C 9wx𝒞9subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞9w_{x}\mathcal{C}9 italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C (2β)wx𝒞2𝛽subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞(-2-\beta)w_{x}\mathcal{C}( - 2 - italic_β ) italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C (2β)wx𝒞2𝛽subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞(-2-\beta)w_{x}\mathcal{C}( - 2 - italic_β ) italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C
Tr[χy(l)]/ηTrdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑦𝑙𝜂{\rm Tr}[\chi_{y}^{(l)}]/\etaroman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] / italic_η 0 3wx𝒞3subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞3w_{x}\mathcal{C}3 italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C 0 0 0
Tr[χz(l)]/ηTrdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑧𝑙𝜂{\rm Tr}[\chi_{z}^{(l)}]/\etaroman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_l ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] / italic_η 0 3wx𝒞3subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞3w_{x}\mathcal{C}3 italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C 0 0 0

Analytical expression of Tr[χi]Trdelimited-[]subscript𝜒𝑖{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ].—Next, we provide a rigorous explanation for the novel and intriguing results obtained above. Due to the presence εfk0subscript𝜀superscriptsubscript𝑓𝑘0\partial_{\varepsilon}f_{k}^{0}∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, at zero temperature the integral in Eq. (Planar Hall Plateau in Magnetic Weyl Semimetals) actually is performed on the Fermi surface. Since Tr[χi(1)]=χi;jj(3)=Tr[χi(3)]/3Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖1superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖𝑗𝑗3Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖33{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(1)}]=-\chi_{i;jj}^{(3)}=-{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(3)}]/3roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = - italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ; italic_j italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] / 3, we start our analysis from Tr[χi(3)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖3{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(3)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ], which can be rewritten as

Tr[χi(3)]=3e3τ(2π)32ε=EFviΩ𝑑S,Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖33superscript𝑒3𝜏superscript2𝜋3superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2subscriptcontour-integral𝜀subscript𝐸𝐹subscript𝑣𝑖subscriptΩperpendicular-todifferential-d𝑆{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(3)}]=3\frac{e^{3}\tau}{(2\pi)^{3}\hbar^{2}}\oint_{% \varepsilon=E_{F}}v_{i}\Omega_{\perp}dS,roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = 3 divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∮ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_S , (10)

where S𝑆Sitalic_S denotes the Fermi surface, the subscript perpendicular-to\perp represents the normal component of the corresponding quantities with respect to S𝑆Sitalic_S, and the equations 𝒗𝒌𝛀𝒌=vΩsubscript𝒗𝒌subscript𝛀𝒌subscript𝑣perpendicular-tosubscriptΩperpendicular-to\bm{v_{k}}\cdot\bm{\Omega_{k}}=v_{\perp}\Omega_{\perp}bold_italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ bold_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and v=kε/subscript𝑣perpendicular-tosubscriptsubscript𝑘perpendicular-to𝜀Planck-constant-over-2-piv_{\perp}=\partial_{k_{\perp}}\varepsilon/\hbaritalic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε / roman_ℏ are used. For model (9), its dispersion is ε=wxkx+ε0𝜀subscript𝑤𝑥subscript𝑘𝑥subscript𝜀0\varepsilon=w_{x}k_{x}+\varepsilon_{0}italic_ε = italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with ε0subscript𝜀0\varepsilon_{0}italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denotes the dispersion without energy tilt. Then, one has vx=wx/+vx,0subscript𝑣𝑥subscript𝑤𝑥Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝑣𝑥0v_{x}=w_{x}/\hbar+v_{x,0}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_ℏ + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with vx,0=kxε0/subscript𝑣𝑥0subscriptsubscript𝑘𝑥subscript𝜀0Planck-constant-over-2-piv_{x,0}=\partial_{k_{x}}\varepsilon_{0}/\hbaritalic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_ℏ. Interestingly, the x𝑥xitalic_x-component of Tr[χ(3)]Trdelimited-[]superscript𝜒3{\rm Tr}[\chi^{(3)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] becomes [see the Supplementary Material [85] for details]

Tr[χx(3)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑥3\displaystyle{\rm Tr}[\chi_{x}^{(3)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] =3e3τ(2π)33(wxΩ𝑑S+vx,0Ω𝑑S)absent3superscript𝑒3𝜏superscript2𝜋3superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3subscript𝑤𝑥contour-integralsubscriptΩperpendicular-todifferential-d𝑆contour-integralPlanck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝑣𝑥0subscriptΩperpendicular-todifferential-d𝑆\displaystyle=\frac{3e^{3}\tau}{(2\pi)^{3}\hbar^{3}}(w_{x}\oint\Omega_{\perp}% dS+\oint\hbar v_{x,0}\Omega_{\perp}dS)= divide start_ARG 3 italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∮ roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_S + ∮ roman_ℏ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_S )
=9ηwx𝒞,absent9𝜂subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞\displaystyle=9\eta w_{x}\mathcal{C},= 9 italic_η italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C , (11)

with η=e3τ12π23𝜂superscript𝑒3𝜏12superscript𝜋2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi3\eta=\frac{e^{3}\tau}{12\pi^{2}\hbar^{3}}italic_η = divide start_ARG italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ end_ARG start_ARG 12 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG and 𝒞𝒞\mathcal{C}caligraphic_C the Chern number of the 2D Fermi surface, which is exactly the Chern number of the WP. Since the energy tilt along ky(z)subscript𝑘𝑦𝑧k_{y(z)}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y ( italic_z ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is zero, one has Tr[χy(3)]=Tr[χz(3)]=0Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑦3Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑧30{\rm Tr}[\chi_{y}^{(3)}]={\rm Tr}[\chi_{z}^{(3)}]=0roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = 0 [85]. Besides, from Eq. Planar Hall Plateau in Magnetic Weyl Semimetals, we have Tr[χi(2)]=(Tr[χx(3)]+Tr[χy(3)]+Tr[χz(3)])/3Trdelimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝜒2𝑖Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑥3Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑦3Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑧33{\rm Tr}[\chi^{(2)}_{i}]=({\rm Tr}[\chi_{x}^{(3)}]+{\rm Tr}[\chi_{y}^{(3)}]+{% \rm Tr}[\chi_{z}^{(3)}])/3roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] = ( roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] + roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] + roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] ) / 3, indicating that Tr[χx/y/z(2)]=3ηwx𝒞Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑥𝑦𝑧23𝜂subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞{\rm Tr}[\chi_{x/y/z}^{(2)}]=3\eta w_{x}\mathcal{C}roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x / italic_y / italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = 3 italic_η italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C. Therefore, the PHE conductivity contributed by Berry curvature is

Tr[χxΩ]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑥Ω\displaystyle{\rm Tr}[\chi_{x}^{\Omega}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] =\displaystyle== 9ηwx𝒞,9𝜂subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞\displaystyle 9\eta w_{x}\mathcal{C},9 italic_η italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C , (12)
Tr[χyΩ]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑦Ω\displaystyle{\rm Tr}[\chi_{y}^{\Omega}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] =\displaystyle== Tr[χzΩ]=3ηwx𝒞.Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑧Ω3𝜂subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞\displaystyle{\rm Tr}[\chi_{z}^{\Omega}]=3\eta w_{x}\mathcal{C}.roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ω end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = 3 italic_η italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C . (13)

A more complicated calculation demonstrates that Tr[χi(4)]=Tr[χi(5)]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖4Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑖5{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(4)}]={\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}^{(5)}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 5 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ], and the PHE conductivity contributed by orbital moment is [85]

Tr[χxm]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑥𝑚\displaystyle{\rm Tr}[\chi_{x}^{m}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] =\displaystyle== (4+2β)ηwx𝒞,42𝛽𝜂subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞\displaystyle-(4+2\beta)\eta w_{x}\mathcal{C},- ( 4 + 2 italic_β ) italic_η italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C , (14)
Tr[χym]Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑦𝑚\displaystyle{\rm Tr}[\chi_{y}^{m}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] =\displaystyle== Tr[χzm]=0,Trdelimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝜒𝑧𝑚0\displaystyle{\rm Tr}[\chi_{z}^{m}]=0,roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] = 0 , (15)

with β=[2α3+3α+3(α21)arctanhα]/α3𝛽delimited-[]2superscript𝛼33𝛼3superscript𝛼21arctanh𝛼superscript𝛼3\beta=[-2\alpha^{3}+3\alpha+3(\alpha^{2}-1)\operatorname{arctanh}\alpha]/% \alpha^{3}italic_β = [ - 2 italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 3 italic_α + 3 ( italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 ) roman_arctanh italic_α ] / italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and α=|wx/v1|<1𝛼subscript𝑤𝑥subscript𝑣11\alpha=|w_{x}/v_{1}|<1italic_α = | italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | < 1 denoting the relative energy tilt. Obviously, β𝛽\betaitalic_β represents the deviation of Tr[χx(m)]Trdelimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝜒𝑚𝑥{\rm Tr}[\chi^{(m)}_{x}]roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_m ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] from a simple linear relationship with wx𝒞subscript𝑤𝑥𝒞w_{x}{\cal{C}}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C. It rapidly approaches zero as wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decreases, which can be inferred from the alternative expression of β𝛽\betaitalic_β: β=n=16α2n4n2+8n+3𝛽superscriptsubscript𝑛16superscript𝛼2𝑛4superscript𝑛28𝑛3\beta=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{6\alpha^{2n}}{4n^{2}+8n+3}italic_β = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 6 italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_n start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 8 italic_n + 3 end_ARG. The Eqs. (12-15) are the main results of this work, and is summarized in Table 1. These results directly show that the PHE is highly nontrivial, and originates from the global topological quantities of the Fermi surface. Consequently, in contrast to various Hall effects, the PHE conductivity in magnetic Weyl semimetals are robust against many kinds of small perturbations, as shown in Fig. 3.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) Band structure of the Weyl model (Planar Hall Plateau in Magnetic Weyl Semimetals). (b) Variation of the PHE conductivity with Fermi energy where the corresponding β=0.069𝛽0.069\beta=0.069italic_β = 0.069. We set τ=0.1ps𝜏0.1ps\tau=0.1~{}\rm{ps}italic_τ = 0.1 roman_ps, m=t=1.5eVÅ𝑚𝑡1.5eVÅm=t=1.5\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}italic_m = italic_t = 1.5 eV ⋅ Å, wx=0.6eVÅsubscript𝑤𝑥0.6eVÅw_{x}=0.6\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.6 eV ⋅ Å, Δ=0.06eVÅΔ0.06eVÅ\Delta=0.06\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{\AA}roman_Δ = 0.06 eV ⋅ Å and k0=π/2Å1subscript𝑘0𝜋2superscriptÅ1k_{0}=\pi/2\ \text{\AA}^{-1}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_π / 2 Å start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Lattice model.—Our results so far are obtained on the effective model around a WP. We point out that the PHE plateau can persist in a realistic lattice model, and is almost precise when the Fermi energy is around WPs. Consider a minimal lattice models for topological magnetic Weyl semimetal, expressed as [86]

3=subscript3absent\displaystyle\mathcal{H}_{3}=caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [m(cosky+coskz2)t(coskxcosk0)]σxdelimited-[]𝑚subscript𝑘𝑦subscript𝑘𝑧2𝑡subscript𝑘𝑥subscript𝑘0subscript𝜎𝑥\displaystyle\left[m\left(\cos k_{y}+\cos k_{z}-2\right)-t\left(\cos k_{x}-% \cos k_{0}\right)\right]\sigma_{x}[ italic_m ( roman_cos italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_cos italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 2 ) - italic_t ( roman_cos italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_cos italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
tsinkyσytsinkzσz+wx(cosk0coskx)𝑡subscript𝑘𝑦subscript𝜎𝑦𝑡subscript𝑘𝑧subscript𝜎𝑧subscript𝑤𝑥subscript𝑘0subscript𝑘𝑥\displaystyle-t\sin k_{y}\sigma_{y}-t\sin k_{z}\sigma_{z}+w_{x}\left(\cos k_{0% }-\cos k_{x}\right)- italic_t roman_sin italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_t roman_sin italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_cos italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_cos italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
+Δsinkx,Δsubscript𝑘𝑥\displaystyle+\Delta\sin k_{x},+ roman_Δ roman_sin italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (16)

where m𝑚mitalic_m, t𝑡titalic_t and k0subscript𝑘0k_{0}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are model parameters, and wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denotes the energy tilt. The band structure of the Weyl model (Planar Hall Plateau in Magnetic Weyl Semimetals) is plotted in Fig. 4(a), in which two tilted linear WPs with |𝒞=1||{\cal C}=1|| caligraphic_C = 1 | at (±k0,0,0)plus-or-minussubscript𝑘000(\pm k_{0},0,0)( ± italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 , 0 ) position can be observed when wxsubscript𝑤𝑥w_{x}italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is finite. Since the two WPs have both opposite energy tilt and Chern number, one can expect that the total PHE conductivity Tr[χi](wx𝒞)annotatedTrdelimited-[]subscript𝜒𝑖proportional-toabsentsubscript𝑤𝑥𝒞{\rm Tr}[\chi_{i}](\propto w_{x}{\cal C})roman_Tr [ italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] ( ∝ italic_w start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_C ) from the two WPs would not be canceled but is added.

The numerically calculated PHE conductivities of model (Planar Hall Plateau in Magnetic Weyl Semimetals) as a function of EFsubscript𝐸𝐹E_{F}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are plotted in Fig. 4(b). These conductivities continue to display a flat plateau and preserve their mutual proportional relationships, as revealed in Eqs. (12-15) and Table 1. Moreover, the plateau values have now doubled due to the presence of two WPs.

Conclusions.— In conclusion, we demonstrate that the PHE conductivity can be directly related to the topological charge of WPs, and then features quantized plateau by varying many material parameters. Our work significantly advances the understanding of magnetotransport in magnetic Weyl semimetals, highlighting the crucial role of Chern number and energy tilt of the WPs, and providing an attractive prospect for future explorations on quantized Hall transport phenomena in topological materials.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFA0308800), the NSF of China (Grants Nos. 12004035, 12234003 and 12321004) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grants Nos. 2021TQ0043 and 2021M700437).

References

  • Xiao et al. [2010] D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010).
  • Bansil et al. [2016] A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Colloquium: Topological band theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021004 (2016).
  • Yao et al. [2004] Y. Yao, L. Kleinman, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, D.-s. Wang, E. Wang, and Q. Niu, First principles calculation of anomalous Hall conductivity in ferromagnetic bcc Fe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 037204 (2004).
  • Sodemann and Fu [2015] I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invariant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015).
  • Xu et al. [2018] S.-Y. Xu, Q. Ma, H. Shen, V. Fatemi, S. Wu, T.-R. Chang, G. Chang, A. M. M. Valdivia, C.-K. Chan, Q. D. Gibson, et al., Electrically switchable Berry curvature dipole in the monolayer topological insulator \chWTe2, Nature Physics 14, 900 (2018).
  • Zhang et al. [2018] Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, and B. Yan, Berry curvature dipole in Weyl semimetal materials: An ab initio study, Phys. Rev. B 97, 041101 (2018).
  • Ye et al. [2023] X.-G. Ye, H. Liu, P.-F. Zhu, W.-Z. Xu, S. A. Yang, N. Shang, K. Liu, and Z.-M. Liao, Control over Berry curvature dipole with electric field in \chWTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 016301 (2023).
  • Liu et al. [2021] H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, W. Wu, X.-L. Sheng, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic second-order anomalous Hall effect and its application in compensated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 277202 (2021).
  • Wang et al. [2021] C. Wang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect in antiferromagnetic tetragonal \chCuMnAs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 277201 (2021).
  • Liu et al. [2022a] H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, X. Feng, C. Xiao, W. Wu, S. Lai, W.-b. Gao, and S. A. Yang, Berry connection polarizability tensor and third-order hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 105, 045118 (2022a).
  • Zhu et al. [2023] Z. Zhu, H. Liu, Y. Ge, Z. Zhang, W. Wu, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Third-order charge transport in a magnetic topological semimetal, Phys. Rev. B 107, 205120 (2023).
  • Gao et al. [2014] Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 166601 (2014).
  • Xiao et al. [2022] C. Xiao, H. Liu, W. Wu, H. Wang, Q. Niu, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic nonlinear electric spin generation in centrosymmetric magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 086602 (2022).
  • Piéchon et al. [2016] F. Piéchon, A. Raoux, J.-N. Fuchs, and G. Montambaux, Geometric orbital susceptibility: Quantum metric without Berry curvature, Phys. Rev. B 94, 134423 (2016).
  • Rhim et al. [2020] J.-W. Rhim, K. Kim, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum distance and anomalous Landau levels of flat bands, Nature 584, 59 (2020).
  • Ahn et al. [2022] J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Riemannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nature Physics 18, 290 (2022).
  • Das et al. [2023] K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B 108, L201405 (2023).
  • Xiang et al. [2024] L. Xiang, B. Wang, Y. Wei, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, Linear displacement current solely driven by the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115121 (2024).
  • Chiu et al. [2016] C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
  • Xie et al. [2021] B. Xie, H.-X. Wang, X. Zhang, P. Zhan, J.-H. Jiang, M. Lu, and Y. Chen, Higher-order band topology, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 520 (2021).
  • Bradlyn et al. [2017] B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature 547, 298 (2017).
  • Po et al. [2017] H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry-based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups, Nature communications 8, 50 (2017).
  • Kruthoff et al. [2017] J. Kruthoff, J. de Boer, J. van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R.-J. Slager, Topological classification of crystalline insulators through band structure combinatorics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041069 (2017).
  • Vanderbilt [2018] D. Vanderbilt, Berry phases in electronic structure theory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insulators (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
  • Bernevig [2013] B. A. Bernevig, Topological insulators and topological superconductors (Princeton university press, 2013).
  • SHEN [2018] S.-Q. SHEN, Topological Insulators: Dirac𝐷𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑐Diracitalic_D italic_i italic_r italic_a italic_c Equation in Condensed Matter (Springer, 2018).
  • Du et al. [2021] Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Nonlinear Hall effects, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 744 (2021).
  • Xiao et al. [2019] C. Xiao, Z. Z. Du, and Q. Niu, Theory of nonlinear hall effects: Modified semiclassics from quantum kinetics, Phys. Rev. B 100, 165422 (2019).
  • Nandy and Sodemann [2019] S. Nandy and I. Sodemann, Symmetry and quantum kinetics of the nonlinear Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 100, 195117 (2019).
  • Lai et al. [2021] S. Lai, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Zhao, X. Feng, N. Wang, C. Tang, Y. Liu, K. Novoselov, S. A. Yang, et al., Third-order nonlinear Hall effect induced by the Berry-connection polarizability tensor, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 869 (2021).
  • Wang et al. [2023a] J. Wang, H. Zeng, W. Duan, and H. Huang, Intrinsic nonlinear Hall detection of the Néel vector for two-dimensional antiferromagnetic spintronics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 056401 (2023a).
  • Nag et al. [2023] T. Nag, S. K. Das, C. Zeng, and S. Nandy, Third-order Hall effect in the surface states of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245141 (2023).
  • Wang et al. [2023b] N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang, et al., Quantum-metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topological antiferromagnet, Nature 621, 487 (2023b).
  • Gao et al. [2023] A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V. Trevisan, Y. Onishi, C. Hu, T. Qian, H.-J. Tien, S.-W. Chen, et al., Quantum metric nonlinear Hall effect in a topological antiferromagnetic heterostructure, Science 381, 181 (2023).
  • Kaplan et al. [2023] D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, General nonlinear Hall current in magnetic insulators beyond the quantum anomalous Hall effect, Nature communications 14, 3053 (2023).
  • Xiang et al. [2023] L. Xiang, C. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. Wang, Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect with generalized semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075411 (2023).
  • Ma et al. [2023] D. Ma, A. Arora, G. Vignale, and J. C. W. Song, Anomalous skew-scattering nonlinear hall effect and chiral photocurrents in 𝒫𝒯𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}caligraphic_P caligraphic_T-symmetric antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 076601 (2023).
  • Xiao et al. [2023] C. Xiao, W. Wu, H. Wang, Y.-X. Huang, X. Feng, H. Liu, G.-Y. Guo, Q. Niu, and S. A. Yang, Time-reversal-even nonlinear current induced spin polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 166302 (2023).
  • Kirikoshi and Hayami [2023] A. Kirikoshi and S. Hayami, Microscopic mechanism for intrinsic nonlinear anomalous Hall conductivity in noncollinear antiferromagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. B 107, 155109 (2023).
  • Wang et al. [2024a] L. Wang, J. Zhu, H. Chen, H. Wang, J. Liu, Y.-X. Huang, B. Jiang, J. Zhao, H. Shi, G. Tian, H. Wang, Y. Yao, D. Yu, Z. Wang, C. Xiao, S. A. Yang, and X. Wu, Orbital magneto-nonlinear anomalous Hall effect in kagome magnet \chFe3Sn2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 106601 (2024a).
  • Das et al. [2024] K. Das, K. Ghorai, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Nonlinear valley Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 096302 (2024).
  • Fang et al. [2023] Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Quantum geometry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11489  (2023).
  • Huang et al. [2023a] Y.-X. Huang, C. Xiao, S. A. Yang, and X. Li, Scaling law for time-reversal-odd nonlinear transport, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01219  (2023a).
  • Kaplan et al. [2024] D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Unification of nonlinear anomalous Hall effect and nonreciprocal magnetoresistance in metals by the quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 026301 (2024).
  • Zhao et al. [1997] B. Zhao, X. Yan, and A. B. Pakhomov, Anisotropic magnetoresistance and planar Hall effect in magnetic metal-insulator composite films, Journal of Applied Physics 81, 5527 (1997).
  • He et al. [2019] P. He, S. S.-L. Zhang, D. Zhu, S. Shi, O. G. Heinonen, G. Vignale, and H. Yang, Nonlinear planar Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016801 (2019).
  • Zyuzin [2020] V. A. Zyuzin, In-plane Hall effect in two-dimensional helical electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 102, 241105 (2020).
  • Battilomo et al. [2021] R. Battilomo, N. Scopigno, and C. Ortix, Anomalous planar Hall effect in two-dimensional trigonal crystals, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L012006 (2021).
  • Cao et al. [2023] J. Cao, W. Jiang, X.-P. Li, D. Tu, J. Zhou, J. Zhou, and Y. Yao, In-plane anomalous Hall effect in 𝒫𝒯𝒫𝒯\mathcal{PT}caligraphic_P caligraphic_T-symmetric antiferromagnetic materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 166702 (2023).
  • Huang et al. [2023b] Y.-X. Huang, X. Feng, H. Wang, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic nonlinear planar Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 126303 (2023b).
  • Wang et al. [2023c] Y. Wang, Z.-G. Zhu, and G. Su, Field-induced Berry connection and planar Hall effect in tilted Weyl semimetals (2023c), arXiv:2303.03579 [cond-mat.mes-hall] .
  • Ba et al. [2023] J.-Y. Ba, Y.-M. Wang, H.-J. Duan, M.-X. Deng, and R.-Q. Wang, Nonlinear planar Hall effect induced by interband transitions: Application to surface states of topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, L241104 (2023).
  • Huang et al. [2023c] Y.-X. Huang, Y. Wang, H. Wang, C. Xiao, X. Li, and S. A. Yang, Nonlinear current response of two-dimensional systems under in-plane magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075155 (2023c).
  • Zheng et al. [2024] H. Zheng, D. Zhai, C. Xiao, and W. Yao, Layer coherence origin of intrinsic Planar hall effect in 2D limit, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17166  (2024).
  • Xiang and Wang [2024] L. Xiang and J. Wang, Intrinsic in-plane magnetononlinear hall effect in tilted weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 109, 075419 (2024).
  • Wang et al. [2024b] H. Wang, Y.-X. Huang, H. Liu, X. Feng, J. Zhu, W. Wu, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Orbital origin of the intrinsic planar hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056301 (2024b).
  • Ge et al. [2020] J. Ge, D. Ma, Y. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Li, J. Luo, T. Luo, Y. Xing, J. Yan, D. Mandrus, H. Liu, X. C. Xie, and J. Wang, Unconventional Hall effect induced by Berry curvature, National Science Review 7, 1879 (2020).
  • Zhong et al. [2023] J. Zhong, J. Zhuang, and Y. Du, Recent progress on the planar hall effect in quantum materials, Chinese Physics B 32, 047203 (2023).
  • Xu et al. [2018] S. Xu, H. Wang, X.-Y. Wang, Y. Su, P. Cheng, and T.-L. Xia, Planar Hall effect in the Dirac semimetal PdTe2subscriptPdTe2\mathrm{PdTe}_{2}roman_PdTe start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1811.06767 (2018), arXiv:1811.06767 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] .
  • Wu et al. [2018] M. Wu, G. Zheng, W. Chu, Y. Liu, W. Gao, H. Zhang, J. Lu, Y. Han, J. Zhou, W. Ning, and M. Tian, Probing the chiral anomaly by planar Hall effect in Dirac semimetal Cd3As2subscriptCd3subscriptAs2{\mathrm{Cd}}_{3}{\mathrm{As}}_{2}roman_Cd start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_As start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT nanoplates, Phys. Rev. B 98, 161110 (2018).
  • Wang et al. [2018] Y. J. Wang, J. X. Gong, D. D. Liang, M. Ge, J. R. Wang, W. K. Zhu, and C. J. Zhang, Planar Hall effect in type-II Weyl semimetal WTe2subscriptWTe2\mathrm{WTe}_{2}roman_WTe start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1801.05929 (2018), arXiv:1801.05929 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] .
  • Singha et al. [2018] R. Singha, S. Roy, A. Pariari, B. Satpati, and P. Mandal, Planar Hall effect in the type-II Dirac semimetal VAl3subscriptVAl3{\mathrm{VAl}}_{3}roman_VAl start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. B 98, 081103 (2018).
  • Kumar et al. [2018] N. Kumar, S. N. Guin, C. Felser, and C. Shekhar, Planar Hall effect in the Weyl semimetal \chGdPtBi, Phys. Rev. B 98, 041103 (2018).
  • Li et al. [2019] P. Li, C. Zhang, Y. Wen, L. Cheng, G. Nichols, D. G. Cory, G.-X. Miao, and X.-X. Zhang, Anisotropic planar Hall effect in the type-II topological Weyl semimetal WTe2subscriptWTe2{\mathrm{WTe}}_{2}roman_WTe start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. B 100, 205128 (2019).
  • Sonika et al. [2023] Sonika, S. Gangwar, N. S. Mehta, G. Sharma, and C. S. Yadav, Chiral anomaly and positive longitudinal magnetoresistance in the typeii𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑖type-iiitalic_t italic_y italic_p italic_e - italic_i italic_i dirac semimetals Axpdte2(a=Cu,Ag)subscript𝐴𝑥subscriptpdte2𝑎CuAg{A}_{x}{\mathrm{pdte}}_{2}(a=\mathrm{Cu},\mathrm{Ag})italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_pdte start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_a = roman_Cu , roman_Ag )Phys. Rev. B 108, 245141 (2023).
  • Li et al. [2023a] L. Li, E. Yi, B. Wang, G. Yu, B. Shen, Z. Yan, and M. Wang, Higher-order oscillatory planar Hall effect in topological kagome metal, npj Quantum Materials 8, 2 (2023a).
  • Li et al. [2023b] L. Li, J. Cao, C. Cui, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Planar Hall effect in topological Weyl and nodal-line semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 085120 (2023b).
  • Nandy et al. [2017] S. Nandy, G. Sharma, A. Taraphder, and S. Tewari, Chiral anomaly as the origin of the planar Hall effect in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 176804 (2017).
  • Ma et al. [2019] D. Ma, H. Jiang, H. Liu, and X. C. Xie, Planar Hall effect in tilted Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 99, 115121 (2019).
  • Yamada and Fuseya [2022] A. Yamada and Y. Fuseya, Negative magnetoresistance and sign change of the planar Hall effect due to negative off-diagonal effective mass in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205207 (2022).
  • Deng et al. [2019] M.-X. Deng, H.-J. Duan, W. Luo, W. Y. Deng, R.-Q. Wang, and L. Sheng, Quantum oscillation modulated angular dependence of the positive longitudinal magnetoconductivity and planar Hall effect in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 99, 165146 (2019).
  • Imran and Hershfield [2018] M. Imran and S. Hershfield, Berry curvature force and Lorentz force comparison in the magnetotransport of Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205139 (2018).
  • Woo et al. [2022] S. Woo, B. Min, and H. Min, Semiclassical magnetotransport including effects of Berry curvature and Lorentz force, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205126 (2022).
  • Sharma et al. [2020] G. Sharma, S. Nandy, and S. Tewari, Sign of longitudinal magnetoconductivity and the planar Hall effect in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 102, 205107 (2020).
  • Sadhukhan and Nag [2023] B. Sadhukhan and T. Nag, Effect of chirality imbalance on Hall transport of PrRhC2subscriptPrRhC2{\mathrm{PrRhC}}_{2}roman_PrRhC start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. B 107, L081110 (2023).
  • Ashcroft and Mermin [1976] N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid state physics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976).
  • Liang et al. [2018] T. Liang, J. Lin, Q. Gibson, S. Kushwaha, M. Liu, W. Wang, H. Xiong, J. A. Sobota, M. Hashimoto, P. S. Kirchmann, Z.-X. Shen, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect in ZrTe5subscriptZrTe5\text{ZrTe}_{5}ZrTe start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 5 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTNature Physics 14, 451 (2018).
  • Zhou et al. [2022] J. Zhou, W. Zhang, Y. C. Lin, J. Cao, Y. Zhou, W. Jiang, H. Du, B. Tang, J. Shi, B. Jiang, X. Cao, B. Lin, Q. Fu, C. Zhu, W. Guo, Y. Huang, Y. Yao, S. S. P. Parkin, J. Zhou, Y. Gao, Y. Wang, Y. Hou, Y. Yao, K. Suenaga, X. Wu, and Z. Liu, Heterodimensional superlattice with in-plane anomalous Hall effect, Nature 609, 46 (2022).
  • Yu et al. [2022] Z.-M. Yu, Z. Zhang, G.-B. Liu, W. Wu, X.-P. Li, R.-W. Zhang, S. A. Yang, and Y. Yao, Encyclopedia of emergent particles in three-dimensional crystals, Science Bulletin 67, 375 (2022).
  • Soluyanov et al. [2015] A. A. Soluyanov, D. Gresch, Z. Wang, Q. Wu, M. Troyer, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Type-II Weyl semimetals, Nature 527, 495 (2015).
  • Yu et al. [2016] Z.-M. Yu, Y. Yao, and S. A. Yang, Predicted unusual magnetoresponse in type-II Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 077202 (2016).
  • Cao et al. [2022] J. Cao, C. Zeng, X.-P. Li, M. Wang, S. A. Yang, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Low-Frequency Divergence of Circular Photomagnetic Effect in Topological Semimetals, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2201.06243 (2022).
  • Liu et al. [2022b] G.-B. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, S. A. Yang, and Y. Yao, Systematic investigation of emergent particles in type-III magnetic space groups, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085117 (2022b).
  • Zhang et al. [2022] Z. Zhang, G.-B. Liu, Z.-M. Yu, S. A. Yang, and Y. Yao, Encyclopedia of emergent particles in type-IV magnetic space groups, Phys. Rev. B 105, 104426 (2022).
  • [85] See supplemental material for detailed derivations for the analytical expression of χisubscript𝜒𝑖\chi_{i}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.
  • McCormick et al. [2017] T. M. McCormick, I. Kimchi, and N. Trivedi, Minimal models for topological Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075133 (2017).