Electric field controlled valley-polarized photocurrent switch based on the circular bulk photovoltaic effect

Yaqing Yang,1,5 Xiaoyu Cheng,1,5 Liantuan Xiao,1,5 Suotang Jia,1,5 Jun Chen,2,5,∗ Lei Zhang,1,5,† and Jian Wang3,4,‡ 1State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Institute of Laser Spectroscopy, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006 China
2State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
3College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
4Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China
5Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
Abstract

Efficient electric manipulation of valley degrees of freedom is critical and challenging for the advancement of valley-based information science and technology. We put forth an electrical scheme, based on a two-band Dirac model, that can switch the fully valley-polarized photocurrent between K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys using the circular bulk electro-photovoltaic effect. This is accomplished by applying an out-of-plane electric field to the two-dimensional valley materials, which enables continuous tuning of the Berry curvature and its sign flip. We found that the switch of the fully valley-polarized photocurrent is directly tied to the sign change of Berry curvature, which accompanies a topological phase transition, for instance, the quantum spin Hall effect and the quantum valley Hall effect. This scheme has been confirmed in monolayer BiAsI2 and germanene through first-principles calculations. Our paper offers a promising strategy for the development of a volatile valley-addressable memory device and could inspire further research in this area.

Introduction-Recently, significant research interest has emerged in the development of electronic devices that utilize factors other than an electron’s charge degrees of freedom Cao et al. (2012); Isberg et al. (2013); Hirohata and Takanashi (2014); Urbaszek and Marie (2015); Yu and Yao (2017); Schaibley et al. (2016). Along with spintronics Candini et al. (2011); Otani et al. (2017); Gregersen et al. (2017); Ahn (2020), the valley degrees of freedom in solid materials, such as graphene Xiao et al. (2007); Rycerz et al. (2007); Sui et al. (2015) and transition metal dichalcogenides Xiao et al. (2012); Mak et al. (2014); Lee et al. (2016); Zhu et al. (2014), can be harnessed for information encoding, storage, and transportation Xu et al. (2016); Yu et al. (2020); Wang et al. (2023). To use valley degrees of freedom as information carriers, it is necessary to generate and efficiently control the valley polarization Li et al. (2014a); Zhao et al. (2017); Zeng et al. (2012); Mak et al. (2012). Electric field tuning is a low-power and efficient approach applied to certain two-dimensional valley materials to adjust valley polarization Ezawa (2012); Shimazaki et al. (2015); Zhang et al. (2021); Ye et al. (2016); Li et al. (2018); Liang et al. (2023); Zhou et al. (2021a); Li et al. (2020); Khan et al. (2021); Yu et al. (2015); Li and Zhu (2023); Yuan et al. (2014); Liu et al. (2019); Luo et al. (2017); Sharma et al. (2023). However, the direct use of electric-induced valley switching as a volatile valley-addressable memory device remains unexplored.

When two-dimensional valley materials are exposed to circularly polarized light, electrons in K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys can be selectively excited depending on the light polarization. This process produces a fully valley-polarized photocurrent Zhang et al. (2014); Sipe and Shkrebtii (2000); Xu et al. (2018). Recently, the out-of-plane electric field has been presented to control the direction and magnitude of the charge photocurrent due to the electrically switchable Berry curvature dipole Xu et al. (2018). As such, it is worth exploring if the fully valley-polarized photocurrent can be electrically toggled between K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys by adjusting the quantum geometrical quantity, for instance, Berry curvature. It is our work to fill this gap.

In this paper, we propose a scheme to effectively control and switch the fully valley-polarized photocurrent through an out-of-plane electric field. Based on a two-band Dirac model, we analytically show that the fully valley-polarized photocurrent can be switched between K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys through the circular bulk electro-photovoltaic effect (CBEPV). The fundamental physical mechanism involves changing the sign of Berry curvature in two-dimensional valley materials by applying an out-of-plane electric field. It is found that this change accompanies a topological phase transition between the quantum spin Hall effect (QSHE) and the quantum valley Hall effect (QVHE), or a transition between different QVHE states. The change in the sign of the Berry curvature alters both the valley-dependent optical selection rule and the CBEPV-induced valley-dependent photocurrent, which leads to the switching of the fully valley-polarized photocurrent. Based on atomic first-principles calculations, we present that the fully valley-polarized photocurrent in monolayer BiAsI2 and germanene can be switched between K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys by tuning the out-of-plane electric field. Our paper demonstrates the significant potential of two-dimensional valley materials for use in volatile valley-addressable memory devices.

Berry curvature analysis-We start from the interband optical transition at a 𝐤𝐤\bf kbold_k point in the two-band model. The degree of circular polarization ητz(𝐤)subscript𝜂subscript𝜏𝑧𝐤\eta_{\tau_{z}}({\bf k})italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) can be expressed as Yao et al. (2008)

ητz(𝐤)=e2Ωτzv(𝐤)μBE𝐤,21subscript𝜂subscript𝜏𝑧𝐤𝑒2Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscriptsuperscriptΩ𝑣subscript𝜏𝑧𝐤subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝐵subscript𝐸𝐤21\eta_{\tau_{z}}({\bf k})=\frac{e}{2\hbar}\frac{\Omega^{v}_{\tau_{z}}({\bf k})}% {\mu^{*}_{B}}E_{{\bf k},21}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) = divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG 2 roman_ℏ end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (1)

where Ωτzv(𝐤)subscriptsuperscriptΩ𝑣subscript𝜏𝑧𝐤\Omega^{v}_{\tau_{z}}({\bf k})roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) is the out-of-plane Berry curvature of the valance band. τz=±1subscript𝜏𝑧plus-or-minus1\tau_{z}=\pm 1italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ± 1 denotes K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys, respectively. E𝐤,21=E𝐤,2E𝐤,1subscript𝐸𝐤21subscript𝐸𝐤2subscript𝐸𝐤1E_{{\bf k},21}=E_{{\bf k},2}-E_{{\bf k},1}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the energy difference between two bands at the 𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k point, 1111 and 2222 correspond to valence and conduction bands, and μBsubscriptsuperscript𝜇𝐵\mu^{*}_{B}italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the effective Bohr magneton. The ητzsubscript𝜂subscript𝜏𝑧\eta_{\tau_{z}}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 and -1 values correspond to the absorption of only left (σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) and right (σsubscript𝜎\sigma_{-}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) circularly polarized light, respectively. This suggests that if the Berry curvature’s sign for a specific valley is reversed by applying the out-of-plane electric field, while the sign of E𝐤,21subscript𝐸𝐤21E_{{\bf k},21}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is maintained, the corresponding valley-dependent optical selection rules at K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT can be switched, which is depicted in Fig. 1 (a).

Circularly polarized light is known to produce an injection current in materials when the time reversal symmetry is maintained while the inversion symmetry is broken. The circular photovoltaic/photogalvanic effect (CPGE) induced photocurrent is given by dJ/dt=dJσ+/dtdJσ/dt=βbcaEb(ω)Ec(ω)𝑑𝐽𝑑𝑡𝑑superscript𝐽subscript𝜎𝑑𝑡𝑑superscript𝐽subscript𝜎𝑑𝑡subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑎𝑏𝑐subscript𝐸𝑏𝜔subscript𝐸𝑐𝜔dJ/dt=dJ^{\sigma_{+}}/dt-dJ^{\sigma_{-}}/dt=\beta^{a}_{bc}E_{b}(\omega)E_{c}(-\omega)italic_d italic_J / italic_d italic_t = italic_d italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_d italic_t - italic_d italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_d italic_t = italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( - italic_ω ) De Juan et al. (2017); Sipe and Shkrebtii (2000); Xu et al. (2021), where βbcasubscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑎𝑏𝑐\beta^{a}_{bc}italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the CPGE tensor and Eb,csubscript𝐸𝑏𝑐E_{b,c}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b , italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the optical electric field. For a two-band model containing the valence band and the conduction band, the valley-dependent CPGE tensor can be expressed as Sipe and Shkrebtii (2000); De Juan et al. (2017)

βbca,τz(ω)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑎subscript𝜏𝑧𝑏𝑐𝜔\displaystyle\beta^{a,\tau_{z}}_{bc}(\omega)italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω ) =𝐤τzβbca(𝐤)absentsubscript𝐤subscript𝜏𝑧subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑎𝑏𝑐𝐤\displaystyle=\sum_{{\bf k}\in\tau_{z}}\beta^{a}_{bc}(\bf k)= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k ∈ italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) (2)
=𝐤τziπe32VkaE𝐤,12Ωτzv(𝐤)δ(ωE𝐤,21)absentsubscript𝐤subscript𝜏𝑧𝑖𝜋superscript𝑒3superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2𝑉subscriptsubscript𝑘𝑎subscript𝐸𝐤12subscriptsuperscriptΩ𝑣subscript𝜏𝑧𝐤𝛿Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝜔subscript𝐸𝐤21\displaystyle=\sum_{{\bf k}\in\tau_{z}}\frac{i\pi e^{3}}{\hbar^{2}V}\partial_{% k_{a}}E_{{\bf k},12}\Omega^{v}_{\tau_{z}}({\bf k})\delta(\hbar\omega-E_{{\bf k% },21})= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k ∈ italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_i italic_π italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_V end_ARG ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , 12 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) italic_δ ( roman_ℏ italic_ω - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )

where a,b𝑎𝑏a,bitalic_a , italic_b and c𝑐citalic_c indicate Cartesian indices, a𝑎aitalic_a indicates the direction of the current, and b𝑏bitalic_b and c𝑐citalic_c are the polarization directions of the optical electric field. At a given frequency ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω, the delta function selects the surface in k space where E𝐤,21=ωsubscript𝐸𝐤21Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝜔E_{{\bf k},21}=\hbar\omegaitalic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k , 21 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = roman_ℏ italic_ω. Note that the CPGE induced valley-dependent photocurrent changes its sign if the Berry curvature changes its sign. If ηK/K=±1subscript𝜂𝐾superscript𝐾plus-or-minus1\eta_{K/K^{\prime}}=\pm 1italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ± 1 with no applied out-of-plane electric field, the CPGE tensor βbca,K/Ksubscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑎𝐾superscript𝐾𝑏𝑐\beta^{a,K/K^{\prime}}_{bc}italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a , italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT originates purely from the left/right circularly polarized light contribution. When the out-of-plane electric field is applied, ηK/Ksubscript𝜂𝐾superscript𝐾\eta_{K/K^{\prime}}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT becomes 1minus-or-plus1\mp 1∓ 1 and then βbca,K/Ksubscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑎𝐾superscript𝐾𝑏𝑐\beta^{a,K/K^{\prime}}_{bc}italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a , italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is purely from the right/left circularly polarized light contribution. Consequently, the valley-dependent CPGE tensor βbca,K/Ksubscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑎𝐾superscript𝐾𝑏𝑐\beta^{a,K/K^{\prime}}_{bc}italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a , italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT changes its sign. This suggests that the fully valley-polarized current can be switched between K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys when a specific handed polarized light is shining. Therefore, it is essential to find a kind of system that can use out-of-plane electricity to adjust the sign of the Berry curvature.

To achieve this, we consider the Dirac Hamiltonian Liu et al. (2011a, b); Zhou et al. (2021b); Bampoulis et al. (2023)

H=vf(kxσ^x+τ^zkyσ^y)+λSOs^zτ^zσ^z+Uσ^z,𝐻Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝑣𝑓subscript𝑘𝑥subscript^𝜎𝑥subscript^𝜏𝑧subscript𝑘𝑦subscript^𝜎𝑦subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂subscript^𝑠𝑧subscript^𝜏𝑧subscript^𝜎𝑧𝑈subscript^𝜎𝑧H=\hbar v_{f}(k_{x}\hat{\sigma}_{x}+\hat{\tau}_{z}k_{y}\hat{\sigma}_{y})+% \lambda_{SO}\hat{s}_{z}\hat{\tau}_{z}\hat{\sigma}_{z}+U\hat{\sigma}_{z},italic_H = roman_ℏ italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_σ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + over^ start_ARG italic_τ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_σ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_τ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_σ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_U over^ start_ARG italic_σ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (3)

where vfsubscript𝑣𝑓v_{f}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Fermi velocity. σ^^𝜎\hat{\sigma}over^ start_ARG italic_σ end_ARG is the Pauli matrix denoting orbital. s^zsubscript^𝑠𝑧\hat{s}_{z}over^ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and τ^zsubscript^𝜏𝑧\hat{\tau}_{z}over^ start_ARG italic_τ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represent the spin and valley operator, respectively. λSOsubscript𝜆𝑆𝑂\lambda_{SO}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the intrinsic spin orbital coupling (SOC) strength. U𝑈Uitalic_U stands for the staggered potential, which can be controlled by the out-of-plane electric field Esubscript𝐸perpendicular-toE_{\perp}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. By diagonalizing the Hamiltonian in Eq. (3), we find that the energy spectrum is

E=±(U+λSOszτz)2+2k2vf2.𝐸plus-or-minussuperscript𝑈subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂subscript𝑠𝑧subscript𝜏𝑧2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscript𝑘2superscriptsubscript𝑣𝑓2E=\pm\sqrt{(U+\lambda_{SO}s_{z}\tau_{z})^{2}+\hbar^{2}k^{2}v_{f}^{2}}.italic_E = ± square-root start_ARG ( italic_U + italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (4)

Here, sz=±1subscript𝑠𝑧plus-or-minus1s_{z}=\pm 1italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ± 1 represents the spin up and down components, respectively.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Schematic of proposed valley-dependent optical selection rules switching at K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT by applying an out-of-plane electric field Esubscript𝐸perpendicular-toE_{\perp}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. (b) Crystal structure and (c) band structure of monolayer BiAsI2. The horizontal green dashed line denotes the Fermi energy. (d) The band gap Egsubscript𝐸𝑔E_{g}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the degree of circular polarization ητzsubscript𝜂subscript𝜏𝑧\eta_{\tau_{z}}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys vs the applied perpendicular gate voltage Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The solid and dashed blue lines represent K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys, respectively. (e, f) The Berry curvatures of the valence band for monolayer BiAsI2 in the Brillouin zone when Vg=0,18subscript𝑉𝑔018V_{g}=0,18italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , 18 V, respectively.

The spin-dependent out-of-plane Berry curvature of the valance bands in different valleys is given by

Ωτzsz(𝐤)=2vf2τz(U+λSOszτz)((U+λSOszτz)2+2k2vf2)3/2.subscriptsuperscriptΩsubscript𝑠𝑧subscript𝜏𝑧𝐤superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscriptsubscript𝑣𝑓2subscript𝜏𝑧𝑈subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂subscript𝑠𝑧subscript𝜏𝑧superscriptsuperscript𝑈subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂subscript𝑠𝑧subscript𝜏𝑧2superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscript𝑘2superscriptsubscript𝑣𝑓232\Omega^{s_{z}}_{\tau_{z}}({\bf k})=-\frac{\hbar^{2}v_{f}^{2}\tau_{z}(U+\lambda% _{SO}s_{z}\tau_{z})}{{((U+\lambda_{SO}s_{z}\tau_{z})^{2}+\hbar^{2}k^{2}v_{f}^{% 2}})^{3/2}}.roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) = - divide start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_U + italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG ( ( italic_U + italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (5)

From Eq. (5), we can know that the sign of Berry curvature sgn(ΩK,ΩK,ΩK,ΩK)=(,+,,+)sgnsubscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾\mathrm{sgn}(\Omega^{\uparrow}_{K},\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K},\Omega^{\uparrow}_{% K^{\prime}},\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K^{\prime}})=(-,+,-,+)roman_sgn ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ( - , + , - , + ) when |U|<λSO𝑈subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂|U|<\lambda_{SO}| italic_U | < italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The topological charge Cτzszsubscriptsuperscript𝐶subscript𝑠𝑧subscript𝜏𝑧C^{s_{z}}_{\tau_{z}}italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be obtained by integrating the Berry curvatures. In this situation, the system resides in the QSHE phase with (CK,CK,CK,CK)=(0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5)subscriptsuperscript𝐶𝐾subscriptsuperscript𝐶𝐾subscriptsuperscript𝐶superscript𝐾subscriptsuperscript𝐶superscript𝐾0.50.50.50.5(C^{\uparrow}_{K},C^{\downarrow}_{K},C^{\uparrow}_{K^{\prime}},C^{\downarrow}_% {K^{\prime}})=(-0.5,0.5,-0.5,0.5)( italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ( - 0.5 , 0.5 , - 0.5 , 0.5 ) and spin Chern number 11-1- 1. When |U|>λSO𝑈subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂|U|>\lambda_{SO}| italic_U | > italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the sign of Berry curvature becomes sgn(ΩK,ΩK,ΩK,ΩK)=sgn(U)(,,+,+)sgnsubscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾sgn𝑈\mathrm{sgn}(\Omega^{\uparrow}_{K},\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K},\Omega^{\uparrow}_{% K^{\prime}},\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K^{\prime}})=\mathrm{sgn}(U)(-,-,+,+)roman_sgn ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = roman_sgn ( italic_U ) ( - , - , + , + ). Correspondingly, the system is in the QVHE phase with (CK,CK,CK,CK)=sgn(U)(0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5)subscriptsuperscript𝐶𝐾subscriptsuperscript𝐶𝐾subscriptsuperscript𝐶superscript𝐾subscriptsuperscript𝐶superscript𝐾sgn𝑈0.50.50.50.5(C^{\uparrow}_{K},C^{\downarrow}_{K},C^{\uparrow}_{K^{\prime}},C^{\downarrow}_% {K^{\prime}})=\mathrm{sgn}(U)(-0.5,-0.5,0.5,0.5)( italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = roman_sgn ( italic_U ) ( - 0.5 , - 0.5 , 0.5 , 0.5 ).

We can reverse the sign of the Berry curvature by tuning U𝑈Uitalic_U via the external electric field. According to Eqs. (4) and (5), the top of the valence band, when 0<U<λSO0𝑈subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂0<U<\lambda_{SO}0 < italic_U < italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, is spin down/up in K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys with sign of Berry curvature sgn(ΩK,ΩK)=(+,)sgnsubscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾\mathrm{sgn}(\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K},\Omega^{\uparrow}_{K^{\prime}})=(+,-)roman_sgn ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ( + , - ) . As U𝑈Uitalic_U increases beyond λSOsubscript𝜆𝑆𝑂\lambda_{SO}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the sign of Berry curvatures in both valleys reverses, i.e., sgn(ΩK,ΩK)=(,+)sgnsubscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾\mathrm{sgn}(\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K},\Omega^{\uparrow}_{K^{\prime}})=(-,+)roman_sgn ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ( - , + ). Similarly, when 0<U<λSO0𝑈subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂0<-U<\lambda_{SO}0 < - italic_U < italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the top of the valence band is spin up/down in K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys with sign of Berry curvature sgn(ΩK,ΩK)=(,+)sgnsubscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾\mathrm{sgn}(\Omega^{\uparrow}_{K},\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K^{\prime}})=(-,+)roman_sgn ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ( - , + ). As U𝑈-U- italic_U increases beyond λSOsubscript𝜆𝑆𝑂\lambda_{SO}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the sign of Berry curvatures in both valleys also reverses, i.e., sgn(ΩK,ΩK)=(+,)sgnsubscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾\mathrm{sgn}(\Omega^{\uparrow}_{K},\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K^{\prime}})=(+,-)roman_sgn ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ( + , - ). Moreover, one can directly tune U𝑈Uitalic_U between the U>λSO𝑈subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂-U>\lambda_{SO}- italic_U > italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and U>λSO𝑈subscript𝜆𝑆𝑂U>\lambda_{SO}italic_U > italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT regimes. As a result, the sign of Berry curvature can be switched between sgn(ΩK,ΩK)=(+,)sgnsubscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾\mathrm{sgn}(\Omega^{\uparrow}_{K},\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K^{\prime}})=(+,-)roman_sgn ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ( + , - ) and sgn(ΩK,ΩK)=(,+)sgnsubscriptsuperscriptΩ𝐾subscriptsuperscriptΩsuperscript𝐾\mathrm{sgn}(\Omega^{\downarrow}_{K},\Omega^{\uparrow}_{K^{\prime}})=(-,+)roman_sgn ( roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↓ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , roman_Ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ↑ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ( - , + ) with spin switching in the specific valley.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a,b) The 𝐤𝐤\bf kbold_k-specified contribution to the CPGE tensor βxyy(𝐤)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦𝑥𝑦𝐤\beta^{y}_{xy}({\bf k})italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) of monolayer BiAsI2 in the Brillouin zone when Vg=0,18subscript𝑉𝑔018V_{g}=0,18italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , 18 V, respectively. (c) The valley-dependent CPGE tensor βxyy,τzsubscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦subscript𝜏𝑧𝑥𝑦\beta^{y,\tau_{z}}_{xy}italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs the gate voltage Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Here, the incident photon energy is fixed at ω=0.06Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝜔0.06\hbar\omega=0.06roman_ℏ italic_ω = 0.06 eV. (d1subscript𝑑1d_{1}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT,d2subscript𝑑2d_{2}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) Zoom in on the distribution of βxyy(𝐤)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦𝑥𝑦𝐤\beta^{y}_{xy}({\bf k})italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) near the K valley when Vg=0,18subscript𝑉𝑔018V_{g}=0,18italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , 18 V, respectively.

Fully valley-polarized photocurrent switch-After understanding the proposed underlying mechanism of valley switching, we illustrate the switch of fully valley-polarized photocurrent through an out-of-plane electric field in monolayer BiAsI2 first. The crystal structure of monolayer BiAsI2, which has a hexagonal lattice with broken inversion symmetry, is depicted in Fig. 1 (b). Fig. 1 (c) shows the electronic properties of monolayer BiAsI2 and its low energy physics can be well described by Eq. (3)Zhou et al. (2021b). Based on the first-principles calculations,sup (see also references Kleinman and Bylander (1982); Kresse and Hafner (1993) therein) the monolayer BiAsI2 is in a QSHE state with a direct bandgap of approximately 58585858 meV when SOC is considered. The maximum of the valence band and the minimum of the conduction band are located at the K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley with spin down/up components. When an external out-of-plane electric field is applied, the bandgap of monolayer BiAsI2 gradually decreases and closes as the electric field increases. As the field continues to increase, the bandgap reopens, and monolayer BiAsI2 undergoes a topological phase transition (TPT) from QSHE to QVHE, as illustrated in Fig. 1 (d) and Supplemental Materials Fig. S1sup . Figs. 1 (e) and (f) display the Berry curvature distribution for the valence band in the first Brillouin zone before and after the TPT, respectively. It can be observed that the Berry curvature in the K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley changes sign when an external out-of-plane gate voltage is applied. Correspondingly, ητzsubscript𝜂subscript𝜏𝑧\eta_{\tau_{z}}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT switches from ±1plus-or-minus1\pm 1± 1 to 1minus-or-plus1\mp 1∓ 1, as shown in Fig. 1(d).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (a) The proposed opto-valleytronic device based on two-dimensional valley materials and the corresponding folded Brillouin zone. (e) Schematic plot of the two-probe device constructed by monolayer BiAsI2. The blue, red and yellow spheres represent Bi, As, and I atoms, respectively. (b, f) The valley-polarized photoresponse Rτzsuperscript𝑅subscript𝜏𝑧R^{\tau_{z}}italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT vs the gate voltage Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT under the vertically incident (b) σsubscript𝜎\sigma_{-}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, (f) σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light, respectively. Inserts show the corresponding valley polarization vs Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. (c, g) The effective transmission Teffsubscript𝑇𝑒𝑓𝑓T_{eff}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ at Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and K𝐾Kitalic_K points when Vg=0subscript𝑉𝑔0V_{g}=0italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 V. (d, h) The effective transmission Teffsubscript𝑇𝑒𝑓𝑓T_{eff}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ at Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and K𝐾Kitalic_K points when Vg=18subscript𝑉𝑔18V_{g}=18italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 18 V. Here, the incident photon energy is fixed at ω=0.06Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝜔0.06\hbar\omega=0.06roman_ℏ italic_ω = 0.06 eV.

Next, we calculate the 𝐤𝐤\bf kbold_k-specified CPGE tensor βxyy(𝐤)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦𝑥𝑦𝐤\beta^{y}_{xy}({\bf k})italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) of monolayer BiAsI2 as shown in Fig. 2 (a). We find that the CPGE tensor βxyy(𝐤)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦𝑥𝑦𝐤\beta^{y}_{xy}({\bf k})italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) at K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys has a “dipole” distribution with opposite signs. From Eq. (2), we learn that βxyy(𝐤)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦𝑥𝑦𝐤\beta^{y}_{xy}({\bf k})italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) also depends on E𝐸\partial E∂ italic_E/kysubscript𝑘𝑦\partial k_{y}∂ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which represents the electron’s velocity in the y-direction. Since there is no mirror symmetry in the y-direction, the electron velocity shows opposite signs but different magnitudes in the ky<0subscript𝑘𝑦0k_{y}<0italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 0 and ky>0subscript𝑘𝑦0k_{y}>0italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 regions. As a result, βxyy(𝐤)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦𝑥𝑦𝐤\beta^{y}_{xy}({\bf k})italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) at ky<0subscript𝑘𝑦0k_{y}<0italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 0 and ky>0subscript𝑘𝑦0k_{y}>0italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 0 have opposite signs and do not entirely offset each other. When applying an out-of-plane electric field with gate voltage Vg=18subscript𝑉𝑔18V_{g}=18italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 18V foo , the dipole distribution of the CPGE tensor βxyy,τz(𝐤)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦subscript𝜏𝑧𝑥𝑦𝐤\beta^{y,\tau_{z}}_{xy}({\bf k})italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) at K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys reverses, as Fig. 2 (b) shows. In Fig. 2 (c), we present the valley-dependent CPGE tensor βxyy,τzsubscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦subscript𝜏𝑧𝑥𝑦\beta^{y,\tau_{z}}_{xy}italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs the gate voltage. As the gate voltage increases, the CPGE tensor βxyy,τzsubscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦subscript𝜏𝑧𝑥𝑦\beta^{y,\tau_{z}}_{xy}italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the K𝐾Kitalic_K valley switches from positive to negative, while the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley’s component changes from negative to positive. This suggests a valley photocurrent switch for certain σ±subscript𝜎plus-or-minus\sigma_{\pm}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light.

Since the CPGE involves σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and σsubscript𝜎\sigma_{-}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT together, we then calculate the valley-polarized photoresponse at K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys under certain σsubscript𝜎\sigma_{-}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT/σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light using the non-equilibrium Green’s function combined with density functional theory (NEGF-DFT) formalismTaylor et al. (2001); Zhang et al. (2014). A two-probe transport device is built based on monolayer BiAsI2 valley materials as shown in Fig. 3 (a). In the numerical simulations, the device can be divided into three regions: the central scattering region where the light is shining, and the left and right leads that extend to the electron reservoirs in infinity as shown in Fig. 3 (e). There are five unit cells with a total of 40 atoms in the central scattering region, about 44.23 Å. During the simulation, along the z𝑧zitalic_z direction, vacuum layers of 9.5 Å were added to the top and bottom of the device to avoid the fake interaction between neighboring slabs. Here, back gates are applied throughout the system as shown in Fig. 3 (e) to achieve the gate effect by setting a gate-induced electrostatic boundary condition for the Hartree potential when solving the Poisson equation during the self-consistent calculations.

After obtaining the NEGF-DFT self-consistent device Hamiltonian, the valley-polarized photocurrent flowing in the left electrode, JL,τz(ph)superscriptsubscript𝐽𝐿subscript𝜏𝑧𝑝J_{L,\tau_{z}}^{(ph)}italic_J start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_p italic_h ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, can be expressed using the following formula,Chen et al. (2012); Zhang et al. (2014)

JL,τz(ph)subscriptsuperscript𝐽𝑝𝐿subscript𝜏𝑧\displaystyle J^{(ph)}_{L,\tau_{z}}italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_p italic_h ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =eh𝐤τzTeff(ϵ,𝐤)𝑑ϵabsent𝑒subscript𝐤subscript𝜏𝑧subscript𝑇𝑒𝑓𝑓italic-ϵ𝐤differential-ditalic-ϵ\displaystyle=\frac{e}{h}\sum_{{\bf k}\in\tau_{z}}\int T_{eff}(\epsilon,{\bf k% })d\epsilon= divide start_ARG italic_e end_ARG start_ARG italic_h end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k ∈ italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ϵ , bold_k ) italic_d italic_ϵ (6)
=ieh𝐤τzTr{ΓL[Gph<+fL(ϵ)(Gph>Gph<)]}𝑑ϵ,absent𝑖𝑒subscript𝐤subscript𝜏𝑧TrsubscriptΓ𝐿delimited-[]subscriptsuperscript𝐺𝑝subscript𝑓𝐿italic-ϵsubscriptsuperscript𝐺𝑝subscriptsuperscript𝐺𝑝differential-ditalic-ϵ\displaystyle=\frac{ie}{h}\sum_{{\bf k}\in\tau_{z}}\int{{\rm Tr}\{\Gamma_{L}[G% ^{<}_{ph}+f_{L}(\epsilon)(G^{>}_{ph}-G^{<}_{ph})]\}}d\epsilon,= divide start_ARG italic_i italic_e end_ARG start_ARG italic_h end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_k ∈ italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ roman_Tr { roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ϵ ) ( italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] } italic_d italic_ϵ ,

where L indicates the left lead; ΓL=i(ΣLrΣLa)subscriptΓ𝐿𝑖superscriptsubscriptΣ𝐿𝑟superscriptsubscriptΣ𝐿𝑎\Gamma_{L}=i(\Sigma_{L}^{r}-\Sigma_{L}^{a})roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_i ( roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is the linewidth function and ΣLr=[ΣLa]subscriptsuperscriptΣ𝑟𝐿superscriptdelimited-[]subscriptsuperscriptΣ𝑎𝐿\Sigma^{r}_{L}=[\Sigma^{a}_{L}]^{\dagger}roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = [ roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the retarded self-energy due to the presence of the left lead; Gph</>=G0rΣph</>G0asubscriptsuperscript𝐺absent𝑝superscriptsubscript𝐺0𝑟superscriptsubscriptΣ𝑝absentsuperscriptsubscript𝐺0𝑎G^{</>}_{ph}=G_{0}^{r}\Sigma_{ph}^{</>}G_{0}^{a}italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < / > end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < / > end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT represents the lesser/greater Green’s function including the electron-photon interaction,Henrickson (2002) where the G0r/asuperscriptsubscript𝐺0𝑟𝑎G_{0}^{r/a}italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r / italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the retarded/advanced Green’s functions without photons and Σph</>superscriptsubscriptΣ𝑝absent\Sigma_{ph}^{</>}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < / > end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the self-energy due to the presence of the electron-photon interaction; fL(E)subscript𝑓𝐿𝐸f_{L}(E)italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_E ) is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function of the left lead. Teff(ϵ,𝐤)subscript𝑇𝑒𝑓𝑓italic-ϵ𝐤T_{eff}(\epsilon,\bf k)italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ϵ , bold_k ) is the effective transmission coefficient. The polarization of the light can be defined by a complex vector e. For circularly polarized light, 𝐞=𝟏𝟐(𝐞𝟏±i𝐞𝟐)𝐞12plus-or-minussubscript𝐞1isubscript𝐞2\bf{e}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\bf{e}_{1}\pm\textit{i}\bf{e}_{2})bold_e = divide start_ARG bold_1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG bold_2 end_ARG end_ARG ( bold_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± i bold_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ).Xie et al. (2015) In our numerical calculations, the vectors 𝐞𝟏subscript𝐞1\bf{e_{1}}bold_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and 𝐞𝟐subscript𝐞2\bf{e_{2}}bold_e start_POSTSUBSCRIPT bold_2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are set along the y𝑦yitalic_y and x𝑥xitalic_x directions and the light is incident along the z𝑧-z- italic_z direction as shown in Fig. 3 (e).

For simplicity, we introduce a normalized valley related photoresponseHenrickson (2002); Chen et al. (2012, 2018),

Rτz=JL,τz(ph)eIω,superscript𝑅subscript𝜏𝑧subscriptsuperscript𝐽𝑝𝐿subscript𝜏𝑧𝑒subscript𝐼𝜔R^{\tau_{z}}=\frac{J^{(ph)}_{L,\tau_{z}}}{eI_{\omega}},italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_J start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_p italic_h ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_e italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , (7)

where the unit of Rτzsuperscript𝑅subscript𝜏𝑧R^{\tau_{z}}italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a02/photonsuperscriptsubscript𝑎02𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛{a_{0}^{2}}/{photon}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_p italic_h italic_o italic_t italic_o italic_n and a0subscript𝑎0a_{0}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represents the Bohr radius; Iωsubscript𝐼𝜔I_{\omega}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the photon flux defined as the number of photons per unit time per unit area.

In order to characterize the polarization of the generated valley-polarized photocurrent, the valley polarization (VP) is defined as

Pvalley(%)=|RK||RK||RK|+|RK|×100.P_{valley}(\%)=\frac{|R^{K^{\prime}}|-|R^{K}|}{|R^{K^{\prime}}|+|R^{K}|}\times 1% 00.italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v italic_a italic_l italic_l italic_e italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( % ) = divide start_ARG | italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | - | italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | end_ARG start_ARG | italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | + | italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | end_ARG × 100 . (8)

The valley-polarized photoresponse of a monolayer BiAsI2 dependence on gate voltage is shown in Figs. 3 (b, f). We note that without an external out-of-plane electric field, the photoresponse at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley can only be stimulated by the σsubscript𝜎\sigma_{-}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light, creating a valley polarization of 100%percent100100\%100 %. Yet, when a vertical voltage Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is introduced, the photoresponse at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley decreases, while the photoresponse at the K𝐾Kitalic_K valley rises. At a gate voltage of 18181818V, the photoresponse at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley is nearly zero, and the corresponding valley polarization reaches 100%percent100-100\%- 100 %. In contrast, with σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light, the photoresponse at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley grows with the gate voltage, while the photoresponse at the K𝐾Kitalic_K valley shrinks. Thus, the valley polarization changes from 100100-100- 100 to 100%percent100100\%100 % when the gate voltage of 18181818V is applied. Figs. 3 (c, g) displays the effective transmission coefficient Teffsubscript𝑇𝑒𝑓𝑓T_{eff}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and K𝐾Kitalic_K valleys without gate voltage. It is observed that only the electrons at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley can transport under the σsubscript𝜎\sigma_{-}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light, whereas the electrons at the K𝐾Kitalic_K valley transport under the σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light. However, when the gate voltage Vg=18subscript𝑉𝑔18V_{g}=18italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 18V is used, the electrons at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley can transport under the σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light, while the electrons at the K𝐾Kitalic_K valley operate under the σsubscript𝜎\sigma_{-}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light, as shown in Figs. 3 (d, h). These directly present a fully valley-polarized photocurrent switch, achieved by applying the out-of-plane electric field to the monolayer BiAsI2.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a, b) The band structure of germanene when Vg=8subscript𝑉𝑔minus-or-plus8V_{g}=\mp 8italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∓ 8V, respectively. The horizontal green dashed line represents the Fermi energy. (c) The band gap Egsubscript𝐸𝑔E_{g}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the degree of circular polarization ητzsubscript𝜂subscript𝜏𝑧\eta_{\tau_{z}}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys vs the gate voltage Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The solid and dashed blue lines represent K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys, respectively. (d) The valley-dependent CPGE tensor βxyy,τzsubscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦subscript𝜏𝑧𝑥𝑦\beta^{y,\tau_{z}}_{xy}italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y , italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs the gate voltage Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Here, the incident photon energy is fixed at ω=0.025Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝜔0.025\hbar\omega=0.025roman_ℏ italic_ω = 0.025 eV. (e, f) The 𝐤𝐤\bf kbold_k-specified contribution to the CPGE tensor βxyy(𝐤)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦𝑥𝑦𝐤\beta^{y}_{xy}({\bf k})italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) when Vg=8subscript𝑉𝑔minus-or-plus8V_{g}=\mp 8italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∓ 8V, respectively.

Recently, the TPT induced by the out-of-plane electric field in germanene has been successfully confirmed in experiments.Bandyopadhyay et al. (2022); Li et al. (2014b); Deng et al. (2018); Bampoulis et al. (2023) Consequently, it is promising to realize the fully valley-polarized photocurrent switch based on germanene. Germanene has inversion symmetry, which means the Berry curvature equals zero. When the out-of-plane electric field is applied, this symmetry is broken, leading to a non-zero Berry curvature. The direction of the electric field can control the sign of the Berry curvature. Without an external electric field, germanene is a direct bandgap semiconductor with a bandgap of 20202020 meV. When a negative gate voltage Vg=8subscript𝑉𝑔8V_{g}=-8italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 8V is applied, the maximum valence band at the K𝐾Kitalic_K valley is spin up, while the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley is spin down. Reversing the gate voltage Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to 8888V also reverses the spin of the maximum valence band at the K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley, with a TPT transition between QVHE as discussed in the Dirac model analysis, as shown in Figs. 4 (a, b). When the gate voltage changes from --8 to 8V, the band gap closes twice, which is accompanied by a reversal of the circular polarization degree’s sign, as illustrated in Fig. 4 (c) and Supplemental Materials Fig. S3sup . This results in the flip** of the CPGE tensor’s sign, which offers the potential to switch the valley photocurrent. The CPGE tensor βxyy(𝐤)subscriptsuperscript𝛽𝑦𝑥𝑦𝐤\beta^{y}_{xy}({\bf k})italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) at Vg=8subscript𝑉𝑔minus-or-plus8V_{g}=\mp 8italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∓ 8V at K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys displays an opposite dipole distribution, as shown in Figs. 4 (e) and (f). The corresponding dipole distributions at K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys also reverse through the tuning gate voltage.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: The valley-polarized photoresponse Rτzsuperscript𝑅subscript𝜏𝑧R^{\tau_{z}}italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT vs the gate voltage Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT under the vertically incident (a) σsubscript𝜎\sigma_{-}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, (b) σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light, respectively. Inserts show the corresponding valley polarization vs Vgsubscript𝑉𝑔V_{g}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. (c, d) The effective transmission Teffsubscript𝑇𝑒𝑓𝑓T_{eff}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ at K𝐾Kitalic_K and Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT points when Vg=8subscript𝑉𝑔minus-or-plus8V_{g}=\mp 8italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∓ 8V of the vertically incident σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light. Here, the incident photon energy is fixed at ω=0.025Planck-constant-over-2-pi𝜔0.025\hbar\omega=0.025roman_ℏ italic_ω = 0.025 eV.

Finally, the valley-polarized photoresponse of germanene dependence on gate voltage is shown in Figs. 5 (a, b). When the gate voltage is zero, the Berry curvatures in the Brillouin zone are zero due to the presence of inversion and time reversal symmetries, which in turn results in a zero photoresponse. However, when an out-of-plane electric field is applied, the broken inversion symmetry leads to a non-zero Berry curvature and subsequently, a non-zero photoresponse. When a gate voltage of 88-8- 8V is applied, the photoresponse at Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley can only be stimulated by the σsubscript𝜎\sigma_{-}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light, creating a valley polarization of 100%percent100100\%100 %. Yet, when a vertical voltage Vg=8subscript𝑉𝑔8V_{g}=8italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8V is introduced, the photoresponse at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley is nearly zero, and the corresponding valley polarization reaches 100%percent100-100\%- 100 %. In contrast, with σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circularly polarized light, the photoresponse at the K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley shows the opposite change. Thus, the valley polarization changes from 100100-100- 100 to 100%percent100100\%100 % when the gate voltage of 8minus-or-plus8\mp 8∓ 8V is applied. When calculating the effective transmission coefficients at K/K𝐾superscript𝐾K/K^{\prime}italic_K / italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valleys with σ+subscript𝜎\sigma_{+}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT circular polarized light, we find that when Vg=8subscript𝑉𝑔8V_{g}=-8italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 8V, only the electrons at the K𝐾Kitalic_K valley can transport, while transported electrons at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley are forbidden. When Vg=8subscript𝑉𝑔8V_{g}=8italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 8V, the valley-dependent optical selection rule changes. As a result, only the electrons at the Ksuperscript𝐾K^{\prime}italic_K start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT valley can transport, while the transport of electrons at the K𝐾Kitalic_K valley are forbidden. This confirms that by controlling the direction of the electric field, we can realize a valley switch based on germanene. It is important to note that the valley-polarized photocurrent produced in germanene is symmetrical with the gate voltage. This is because of the presence of inversion symmetry when there is no gate voltage. In contrast, the valley polarized photocurrent in monolayer BiAsI2 is expected to be asymmetrical due to its lower symmetry.

Conclusions-To summarize, we propose a scheme of a valley switch by electric field. This method allows for effective control of valley polarization, resulting in valley photocurrents with opposite valley indices. Using first-principles calculation, we successfully realize the switching of valley-polarized photocurrent using the electric field in monolayer BiAsI2 and germanene. The corresponding valley polarization can be switched between 100100100100 and 100%percent100-100\%- 100 % by applying the out-of-plane electric field. This opens up new possibilities for the development of future valley-based electronic storage devices.

𝐀𝐂𝐊𝐍𝐎𝐖𝐋𝐄𝐃𝐆𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐊𝐍𝐎𝐖𝐋𝐄𝐃𝐆𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐒{\bf ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}bold_ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFA1404003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 12074230, No. 12034014, and No. 12174231), the Fund for Shanxi “1331 Project”, Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (Grant No. 202103021222001), Research Project Supported by Shanxi Scholarship Council of China, and the Graduate Education Innovation Project of Shanxi Province (Grant No. 2023KY013). This research was partially conducted using the High Performance Computer of Shanxi University.


References

  • Cao et al. (2012) Ting Cao, Gang Wang, Wenpeng Han, Huiqi Ye, Chuanrui Zhu, Junren Shi, Qian Niu, **heng Tan, Enge Wang, Baoli Liu,  and Ji Feng, “Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide,” Nature communications 3, 887 (2012).
  • Isberg et al. (2013) Jan Isberg, Markus Gabrysch, Johan Hammersberg, Saman Majdi, Kiran Kumar Kovi,  and Daniel J Twitchen, “Generation, transport and detection of valley-polarized electrons in diamond,” Nature materials 12, 760–764 (2013).
  • Hirohata and Takanashi (2014) Atsufumi Hirohata and Koki Takanashi, “Future perspectives for spintronic devices,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 47, 193001 (2014).
  • Urbaszek and Marie (2015) Bernhard Urbaszek and Xavier Marie, “Divide and polarize,” Nature Physics 11, 94–95 (2015).
  • Yu and Yao (2017) Hongyi Yu and Wang Yao, “Magnetization without polarization,” Nature Materials 16, 876–877 (2017).
  • Schaibley et al. (2016) John R Schaibley, Hongyi Yu, Genevieve Clark, Pasqual Rivera, Jason S Ross, Kyle L Seyler, Wang Yao,  and Xiaodong Xu, “Valleytronics in 2d materials,” Nature Reviews Materials 1, 1–15 (2016).
  • Candini et al. (2011) Andrea Candini, Svetlana Klyatskaya, Mario Ruben, Wolfgang Wernsdorfer,  and Marco Affronte, “Graphene spintronic devices with molecular nanomagnets,” Nano Letters 11, 2634–2639 (2011).
  • Otani et al. (2017) YoshiChika Otani, Masashi Shiraishi, Akira Oiwa, Eiji Saitoh,  and Shuichi Murakami, “Spin conversion on the nanoscale,” Nature Physics 13, 829–832 (2017).
  • Gregersen et al. (2017) Søren Schou Gregersen, Stephen R Power,  and Antti-Pekka Jauho, “Nanostructured graphene for spintronics,” Physical Review B 95, 121406 (2017).
  • Ahn (2020) Ethan C Ahn, “2d materials for spintronic devices,” npj 2D Materials and Applications 4, 1–14 (2020).
  • Xiao et al. (2007) Di Xiao, Wang Yao,  and Qian Niu, “Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: magnetic moment and topological transport,” Physical Review Letters 99, 236809 (2007).
  • Rycerz et al. (2007) A. Rycerz, J. Tworzydło,  and C. W. J. Beenakker, “Valley filter and valley valve in graphene,” Nature Physics 3, 172–175 (2007).
  • Sui et al. (2015) Mengqiao Sui, Guorui Chen, Liguo Ma, Wen-Yu Shan, Dai Tian, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Xiaofeng **, Wang Yao, Di Xiao,  and Yuanbo Zhang, “Gate-tunable topological valley transport in bilayer graphene,” Nature Physics 11, 1027–1031 (2015).
  • Xiao et al. (2012) Di Xiao, Gui-Bin Liu, Wanxiang Feng, Xiaodong Xu,  and Wang Yao, “Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of mos2 and other group-vi dichalcogenides,” Physical Review Letters 108, 196802 (2012).
  • Mak et al. (2014) Kin Fai Mak, Kathryn L McGill, Jiwoong Park,  and Paul L McEuen, “The valley hall effect in mos2 transistors,” Science 344, 1489–1492 (2014).
  • Lee et al. (2016) Jieun Lee, Kin Fai Mak,  and Jie Shan, “Electrical control of the valley hall effect in bilayer mos2 transistors,” Nature nanotechnology 11, 421–425 (2016).
  • Zhu et al. (2014) Bairen Zhu, Hualing Zeng, Junfeng Dai, Zhirui Gong,  and Xiaodong Cui, “Anomalously robust valley polarization and valley coherence in bilayer ws2,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 11606–11611 (2014).
  • Xu et al. (2016) Fuming Xu, Zhizhou Yu, Yafei Ren, Bin Wang, Yadong Wei,  and Zhenhua Qiao, “Transmission spectra and valley processing of graphene and carbon nanotube superlattices with inter-valley coupling,” New Journal of Physics 18, 113011 (2016).
  • Yu et al. (2020) Zhi-Ming Yu, Shan Guan, Xian-Lei Sheng, Weibo Gao,  and Shengyuan A. Yang, “Valley-layer coupling: a new design principle for valleytronics,” Physical Review Letters 124, 037701 (2020).
  • Wang et al. (2023) Kai-Tong Wang, Hui Wang, Fuming Xu, Yun** Yu,  and Yadong Wei, “Realization of valley-spin polarized current via parametric pump in monolayer mos2,” New Journal of Physics 25, 013019 (2023).
  • Li et al. (2014a) Yilei Li, Jonathan Ludwig, Tony Low, Alexey Chernikov, Xu Cui, Ghidewon Arefe, Young Duck Kim, Arend M. Van Der Zande, Albert Rigosi, Heather M. Hill, Suk Hyun Kim, James Hone, Zhiqiang Li, Dmitry Smirnov,  and Tony F. Heinz, “Valley splitting and polarization by the zeeman effect in monolayer mose2,” Physical Review Letters 113, 266804 (2014a).
  • Zhao et al. (2017) Chuan Zhao, Tenzin Norden, Peiyao Zhang, Puqin Zhao, Yingchun Cheng, Fan Sun, James P. Parry, Payam Taheri, Jieqiong Wang, Yihang Yang, Thomas Scrace, Kaifei Kang, Sen Yang, Guo-xing Miao, Renat Sabirianov, George Kioseoglou, Wei Huang, Athos Petrou,  and Hao Zeng, “Enhanced valley splitting in monolayer wse2 due to magnetic exchange field,” Nature nanotechnology 12, 757–762 (2017).
  • Zeng et al. (2012) Hualing Zeng, Junfeng Dai, Wang Yao, Di Xiao,  and Xiaodong Cui, “Valley polarization in mos2 monolayers by optical pum**,” Nature nanotechnology 7, 490–493 (2012).
  • Mak et al. (2012) Kin Fai Mak, Keliang He, Jie Shan,  and Tony F. Heinz, “Control of valley polarization in monolayer mos2 by optical helicity,” Nature nanotechnology 7, 494–498 (2012).
  • Ezawa (2012) Motohiko Ezawa, “Valley-polarized metals and quantum anomalous hall effect in silicene,” Physical Review Letters 109, 055502 (2012).
  • Shimazaki et al. (2015) Yuya Shimazaki, Michihisa Yamamoto, Ivan V. Borzenets, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi,  and Seigo Tarucha, “Generation and detection of pure valley current by electrically induced berry curvature in bilayer graphene,” Nature Physics 11, 1032–1036 (2015).
  • Zhang et al. (2021) Ao Zhang, Kaike Yang, Yun Zhang, Anlian Pan,  and Mingxing Chen, “Electrically switchable valley polarization, spin/valley filter, and valve effects in transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers interfaced with two-dimensional ferromagnetic semiconductors,” Physical Review B 104, L201403 (2021).
  • Ye et al. (2016) Yu Ye, Jun Xiao, Hailong Wang, Ziliang Ye, Hanyu Zhu, Mervin Zhao, Yuan Wang, Jianhua Zhao, Xiaobo Yin,  and Xiang Zhang, “Electrical generation and control of the valley carriers in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide,” Nature nanotechnology 11, 598–602 (2016).
  • Li et al. (2018) Yang Li, Yizhou Liu, Chong Wang, Jianfeng Wang, Yong Xu,  and Wenhui Duan, “Electrically tunable valleytronics in quantum anomalous hall insulating transition metal trihalides,” Physical Review B 98, 201407 (2018).
  • Liang et al. (2023) Li Liang, Ying Yang, Xiaohui Wang,  and Xiao Li, “Tunable valley and spin splittings in vsi2n4 bilayers,” Nano Letters 23, 858–862 (2023).
  • Zhou et al. (2021a) Xiaodong Zhou, Run-Wu Zhang, Zeying Zhang, Wanxiang Feng, Yuriy Mokrousov,  and Yugui Yao, “Sign-reversible valley-dependent berry phase effects in 2d valley-half-semiconductors,” npj Computational Materials 7, 160 (2021a).
  • Li et al. (2020) Lizhong Li, Shengwei Jiang, Zefang Wang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jie Shan,  and Kin Fai Mak, “Electrical switching of valley polarization in monolayer semiconductors,” Physical Review Materials 4, 104005 (2020).
  • Khan et al. (2021) Imran Khan, Brahim Marfoua,  and Jisang Hong, “Electric field induced giant valley polarization in two dimensional ferromagnetic wse2/crsnse3 heterostructure,” npj 2D Materials and Applications 5, 10 (2021).
  • Yu et al. (2015) Zhiming Yu, Hui Pan,  and Yugui Yao, “Electric field controlled spin-and valley-polarized edge states in silicene with extrinsic rashba effect,” Physical Review B 92, 155419 (2015).
  • Li and Zhu (2023) Hui** Li and Wenguang Zhu, “Spin-driven ferroelectricity in two-dimensional magnetic heterostructures,” Nano Letters 23, 10651–10656 (2023).
  • Yuan et al. (2014) Hongtao Yuan, Xinqiang Wang, Biao Lian, Haijun Zhang, Xianfa Fang, Bo Shen, Gang Xu, Yong Xu, Shou-Cheng Zhang, Harold Y. Hwang,  and Yi Cui, “Generation and electric control of spin-valley-coupled circular photogalvanic current in wse2,” Nature nanotechnology 9, 851–857 (2014).
  • Liu et al. (2019) Lei Liu, Erik J. Lenferink, Guohua Wei, Teodor K. Stanev, Nathaniel Speiser,  and Nathaniel P. Stern, “Electrical control of circular photogalvanic spin-valley photocurrent in a monolayer semiconductor,” ACS applied materials & interfaces 11, 3334–3341 (2019).
  • Luo et al. (2017) Yunqiu Kelly Luo, **song Xu, Tiancong Zhu, Guanzhong Wu, Elizabeth J. McCormick, Wenbo Zhan, Mahesh R. Neupane,  and Roland K. Kawakami, “Opto-valleytronic spin injection in monolayer mos2/few-layer graphene hybrid spin valves,” Nano Letters 17, 3877–3883 (2017).
  • Sharma et al. (2023) Sangeeta Sharma, Deepika Gill,  and Samuel Shallcross, “Giant and controllable valley currents in graphene by double pumped thz light,” Nano Letters 23, 10305–10310 (2023).
  • Zhang et al. (2014) Lei Zhang, Kui Gong, **gzhe Chen, Lei Liu, Yu Zhu, Di Xiao,  and Hong Guo, “Generation and transport of valley-polarized current in transition-metal dichalcogenides,” Physical Review B 90, 195428 (2014).
  • Sipe and Shkrebtii (2000) J. E. Sipe and A. I. Shkrebtii, “Second-order optical response in semiconductors,” Physical Review B 61, 5337 (2000).
  • Xu et al. (2018) Su-Yang Xu, Qiong Ma, Huitao Shen, Valla Fatemi, Sanfeng Wu, Tay-Rong Chang, Guoqing Chang, Andrés M. Mier Valdivia, Ching-Kit Chan, Quinn D. Gibson, Jiadong Zhou, Zheng Liu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Hsin Lin, Robert J. Cava, Liang Fu, Nuh Gedik,  and Jarillo-Herrero Pablo, “Electrically switchable berry curvature dipole in the monolayer topological insulator wte2,” Nature Physics 14, 900–906 (2018).
  • Yao et al. (2008) Wang Yao, Di Xiao,  and Qian Niu, “Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking,” Physical Review B 77, 235406 (2008).
  • De Juan et al. (2017) Fernando De Juan, Adolfo G. Grushin, Takahiro Morimoto,  and Joel E. Moore, “Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in weyl semimetals,” Nature communications 8, 15995 (2017).
  • Xu et al. (2021) Haowei Xu, Hua Wang, Jian Zhou,  and Ju Li, “Pure spin photocurrent in non-centrosymmetric crystals: bulk spin photovoltaic effect,” Nature communications 12, 4330 (2021).
  • Liu et al. (2011a) Cheng-Cheng Liu, Wanxiang Feng,  and Yugui Yao, “Quantum spin hall effect in silicene and two-dimensional germanium,” Physical Review Letters 107, 076802 (2011a).
  • Liu et al. (2011b) Cheng-Cheng Liu, Hua Jiang,  and Yugui Yao, “Low-energy effective hamiltonian involving spin-orbit coupling in silicene and two-dimensional germanium and tin,” Physical Review B 84, 195430 (2011b).
  • Zhou et al. (2021b) Tong Zhou, Shuguang Cheng, Michael Schleenvoigt, Peter Schüffelgen, Hua Jiang, Zhongqin Yang,  and Igor Žutić, “Quantum spin-valley hall kink states: From concept to materials design,” Physical Review Letters 127, 116402 (2021b).
  • Bampoulis et al. (2023) Pantelis Bampoulis, Carolien Castenmiller, Dennis J Klaassen, Jelle van Mil, Yichen Liu, Cheng-Cheng Liu, Yugui Yao, Motohiko Ezawa, Alexander N. Rudenko,  and Harold J. W. Zandvliet, “Quantum spin hall states and topological phase transition in germanene,” Physical Review Letters 130, 196401 (2023).
  • (50) See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/XXX for detailed information on the first principle calculations, which includes Refs. [Sipe and Shkrebtii, 2000; De Juan et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2018; Kresse and Hafner, 1993; Kresse and Furthmüller, 1996; Zhou et al., 2021b; Bandyopadhyay et al., 2022; Deng et al., 2018; Taylor et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2014; nan, ; Kleinman and Bylander, 1982; Perdew et al., 1996].
  • Kleinman and Bylander (1982) Leonard Kleinman and D. M. Bylander, “Efficacious form for model pseudopotentials,” Physical Review Letters 48, 1425–1428 (1982).
  • Kresse and Hafner (1993) Georg Kresse and Jürgen Hafner, “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,” Physical Review B 47, 558–561 (1993).
  • (53) The strength of the gate voltage may be realized in the experiments.Zhang et al. (2009); Wang et al. (2019); Weintrub et al. (2022); Tan et al. (2023).
  • Taylor et al. (2001) Jeremy Taylor, Hong Guo,  and Jian Wang, “Ab initio modeling of quantum transport properties of molecular electronic devices,” Physical Review B 63, 245407 (2001).
  • Chen et al. (2012) **gzhe Chen, Yibin Hu,  and Hong Guo, “First-principles analysis of photocurrent in graphene pn𝑝𝑛pnitalic_p italic_n junctions,” Physical Review B 85, 155441 (2012).
  • Henrickson (2002) Lindor E. Henrickson, “Nonequilibrium photocurrent modeling in resonant tunneling photodetectors,” Journal of applied physics 91, 6273–6281 (2002).
  • Xie et al. (2015) Yiqun Xie, Lei Zhang, Yu Zhu, Lei Liu,  and Hong Guo, “Photogalvanic effect in monolayer black phosphorus,” Nanotechnology 26, 455202 (2015).
  • Chen et al. (2018) Jun Chen, Liwen Zhang, Lei Zhang, Xiaohong Zheng, Liantuan Xiao, Suotang Jia,  and Jian Wang, “Photogalvanic effect induced fully spin polarized current and pure spin current in zigzag sic nanoribbons,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 20, 26744–26751 (2018).
  • Bandyopadhyay et al. (2022) Arka Bandyopadhyay, Nesta Benno Joseph,  and Awadhesh Narayan, “Electrically switchable giant berry curvature dipole in silicene, germanene and stanene,” 2D Materials 9, 035013 (2022).
  • Li et al. (2014b) Linfei Li, Shuang-zan Lu, **bo Pan, Zhihui Qin, Yu-qi Wang, Yeliang Wang, Geng-yu Cao, Shixuan Du,  and Hong-Jun Gao, “Buckled germanene formation on pt (111),” Advanced Materials 26, 4820–4824 (2014b).
  • Deng et al. (2018) Jialiang Deng, Bingyu Xia, Xiaochuan Ma, Haoqi Chen, Huan Shan, Xiaofang Zhai, Bin Li, Aidi Zhao, Yong Xu, Wenhui Duan, Shou-Cheng Zhang, Bing Wang,  and J. G. Hou, “Epitaxial growth of ultraflat stanene with topological band inversion,” Nature materials 17, 1081–1086 (2018).
  • Kresse and Furthmüller (1996) G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,” Physical Review B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
  • (63) For details of the NanoDcal quantum tranpsort package, see http://www.hzwtech.com.
  • Perdew et al. (1996) John P Perdew, Kieron Burke,  and Matthias Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996).
  • Zhang et al. (2009) Yuanbo Zhang, Tsung-Ta Tang, Caglar Girit, Zhao Hao, Michael C Martin, Alex Zettl, Michael F Crommie, Y Ron Shen,  and Feng Wang, “Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene,” Nature 459, 820–823 (2009).
  • Wang et al. (2019) Hanwen Wang, Mao-Lin Chen, Mengjian Zhu, Yaning Wang, Baojuan Dong, Xingdan Sun, Xiaorong Zhang, Shimin Cao, Xiaoxi Li, Jianqi Huang, et al., “Gate tunable giant anisotropic resistance in ultra-thin gate,” Nature communications 10, 2302 (2019).
  • Weintrub et al. (2022) Benjamin I Weintrub, Yu-Ling Hsieh, Sviatoslav Kovalchuk, Jan N Kirchhof, Kyrylo Greben,  and Kirill I Bolotin, “Generating intense electric fields in 2d materials by dual ionic gating,” Nature Communications 13, 6601 (2022).
  • Tan et al. (2023) Cheng Tan, Ji-Hai Liao, Guolin Zheng, Meri Algarni, Jia-Yi Lin, Xiang Ma, Edwin LH Mayes, Matthew R Field, Sultan Albarakati, Majid Panahandeh-Fard, et al., “Room-temperature magnetic phase transition in an electrically tuned van der waals ferromagnet,” Physical Review Letters 131, 166703 (2023).