thanks: These authors contributed equally.thanks: These authors contributed equally.

dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave Bose Metal induced by the next-nearest-neighbor hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT

Zhangkai Cao School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China    Jianyu Li School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Carbon Materials Research and Comprehensive Application, Shenzhen 518055, China.    Jiahao Su School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Carbon Materials Research and Comprehensive Application, Shenzhen 518055, China.    Tao Ying School of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China    Ho-Kin Tang [email protected] School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Carbon Materials Research and Comprehensive Application, Shenzhen 518055, China.
(June 12, 2024)
Abstract

Superconductivity arises when electrons form Cooper pairs with phase coherence. In contrast, a lack of phase coherence in Cooper pairs can lead to an uncondensed metallic ground state known as the Bose metal state. In this study, we investigate an attractively interacting fermionic system with nearest-neighbor (NN) hop** (t) and next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) hop** (tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) anisotropy between two species of spins in a two-dimensional (2D) lattice. Utilizing the constrained path quantum Monte Carlo (CPQMC) method, we demonstrate the existence of a dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave Cooper pair Bose metal (CPBM) phase with t/t>0.7superscript𝑡𝑡0.7t^{\prime}/t>0.7italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_t > 0.7. The CPBM phase exhibits a dome-like structure in the phase diagram of filling n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65, with the maximal region around an optimal t/t0.2similar-tosuperscript𝑡𝑡0.2t^{\prime}/t\sim 0.2italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_t ∼ 0.2, suggesting that an appropriate value of tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT facilitates the formation of the Bose metal. Furthermore, we find that a Bose metal formed by fermions with a closed Fermi surface confirms that the crucial condition for this exotic phenomenon is primarily the anisotropy of the Fermi surface, rather than its topology. Our finding of the dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave CPBM demonstrates the same pairing symmetry as the pseudogap behavior in cuprates, and its experimental realization in ultracold atom systems is also feasible.

The cuprate superconductors [1] have sparked significant interest over the past three decades not only due to their high-temperature (Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) unconventional superconductivity. The peculiar behavior of the pseudogap (PG) phenomena in high-Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT superconductors, which might be closely related to the microscopic mechanism of superconductivity, still awaits a well-recognized explanation [2, 3, 4]. One of the most puzzling fact is that the onset of PG phase is accompanied with a gap with “dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave like” symmetry opening below the characteristic temperature (Tsuperscript𝑇T^{*}italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) with no superconductivity signal  [5].

Various types of order are proposed to explain the d𝑑ditalic_d-wave-like PG behavior. In the famous resonating valence bond (RVB) theory [6, 7], the quantum spin liquid (QSL) is argued as the origin of the PG phase, where the charge and spin degrees of freedom are separated, defines a PG of spinons below Tsuperscript𝑇T^{*}italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT when holon condensation is absent [8]. As an alternation of the QSL phase, the Bose liquid or Bose metal is also propsed to explain the strange metal behavior in PG phase, which presumes that Cooper pairs are dominant charge carriers for the electric transport not only in the superconducting (SC) but also in the metallic phases, constituting a conducting quantum fluid instead of a superfluid [9].

In other words, the existence of a Bose metal phase, which Cooper pairs instead of electrons as the primary charge carriers is a bosonic system [10], could potentially explain the strange metal state in high-Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT superconductors. Indeed, from Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) to Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover theory [11], incoherent Cooper pairs begin to form at temperatures Tc<T<Tsubscript𝑇𝑐𝑇superscript𝑇T_{c}<T<T^{*}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_T < italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, before they Bose condense and superconduct at Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which is at the heart of BCS-BEC crossover theory.

Bose metal is argued to leave fingerprint in microscopic model of hard-core bosons with ring exchange on multileg ladders, which called bosonic JK𝐽𝐾J-Kitalic_J - italic_K model [12, 13]. As a variant of Bose metals, Cooper pair Bose metal (CPBM) has been theoretically proposed to exist in 2D systems with no polarization [14, 15]. The anisotropic spin-dependent Fermi surface plus attractive interactions lead to an effective model of Cooper pairs with a ring-exchange term, that may allow to realize a paired but non-superfluid Bose metal phase. The Cooper pairs would form a collective state with gapless excitations along a Bose surface but no condensate in momentum space.

Notably, the fingerprint of CPBM phase in fermions system has been observed in the qausi-1D systems like two-leg ladder [15] and four-leg ladder [16]. In our recent work [17], we have found the CPBM phase in the 2D tU𝑡𝑈t-Uitalic_t - italic_U Hubbard model, with onsite attraction interaction (U𝑈Uitalic_U) and the nearest-neighbor (NN) spin-dependent hop** (t𝑡titalic_t) anisotropy, in which fermions are paired as bosons, and the uncondensed Cooper pairs form a non-superfluid Bose metal phase. But the boson correlation of Bose metal is mainly the dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave, induced by t𝑡titalic_t. In a previous study [18], it was suggested that adding next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) hop** (tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) anisotropy might induce the dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave correlation in the Bose metal phase.

The NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is also argued to strongly affect the properties of superconductivity and other orders, as has been revealed in the previous studies in the Hubbard model [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. A delicate interplay between superconductivity and density wave orders tunable via NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is revealed by using extensive density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) studies of the ttU𝑡superscript𝑡𝑈t-t^{\prime}-Uitalic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_U Hubbard model at hole do** concentration δ=0.125𝛿0.125\delta=0.125italic_δ = 0.125 on four-leg cylinders [22]. The semi-classical Monte Carlo calculations show that introduction of tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT results in a finite temperature PG phase that separates the small U𝑈Uitalic_U Fermi liquid and large U𝑈Uitalic_U Mott insulator. We have discovered the presence of Bose metal phase in tU𝑡𝑈t-Uitalic_t - italic_U Hubbard model [17], but the influence of the NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT on the ground state properties of Bose metal phase remains an outstanding theoretical question.

Here, we choose to focus on the ttU𝑡superscript𝑡𝑈t-t^{\prime}-Uitalic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_U Hubbard model, utilizing the constrained path quantum Monte Carlo (CPQMC) [26, 27], to look at the effect of tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT on the Bose metal phase. Our key conclusions are: (i) We found the exotic CPBM phase in ttU𝑡superscript𝑡𝑈t-t^{\prime}-Uitalic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_U Hubbard model, emerging when a spin-dependent anisotropy suppresses the ordinary s𝑠sitalic_s-wave pairing, and emphasize that the appropriate value of tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT facilitates the formation of the Bose metal phase; (ii) our analysis identifies primary competition between dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave and two types of dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave within the CPBM phase, when tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is large enough (t/t>0.7superscript𝑡𝑡0.7t^{\prime}/t>0.7italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_t > 0.7), the system becomes dominated by dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave Bose metal phase; (iii) we find that a Bose metal formed by fermions with a closed Fermi surface confirms that the crucial condition for this exotic phenomenon is primarily the anisotropy of the Fermi surface, rather than its topology. This dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave Bose metal phase with uncondensed bosons in 2D, provides a controllable route to enhance CPBM and control the closeness of the Fermi surface, offering insights into the theoretical understanding of the pseudogap phase.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) Model and phase diagram. (a) Illustration of the model with spin-dependent anisotropic hop** amplitudes on a square lattice. (b) Schematic zero-temperature phase diagram at U=3𝑈3U=-3italic_U = - 3 (the unit is t𝑡titalic_t) for electron filling n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65, exotic Cooper pair Bose metal (CPBM) exists in the regime with strong spin-dependent anisotropy that suppresses the ordinary s𝑠sitalic_s-wave superfluid (s𝑠sitalic_s-SF). IDW is an incommensurate density wave that exists in strong anisotropy and small tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. CPBM phase divided into two types with t0.7similar-tosuperscript𝑡0.7t^{\prime}\sim 0.7italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 0.7 as the boundary, and dominated by dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave and dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave correlation between bosons, respectively. The inset shows the illustration for conventional s𝑠sitalic_s-wave pairing by up and down spins, and nonzero momentum s𝑠sitalic_s-wave pairing by up and down spins. (c)-(e) CPQMC simulation result of the s𝑠sitalic_s-wave pair momentum distribution function Nspair(𝐤)subscript𝑁s𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑟𝐤N_{\mathrm{s}-pair}({\bf k})italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s - italic_p italic_a italic_i italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) for different t=0.2, 0.5, 0.8superscript𝑡0.20.50.8t^{\prime}=0.2,\ 0.5,\ 0.8italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.2 , 0.5 , 0.8 at α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05 with electron filling n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65 on 16 ×\times× 16 lattice, showing obvious existence of nonzero momentum Bose surface, which is the signal for determining the exotic CPBM phase. The determination of each phase region in the phase diagram is inferred from our CPQMC data (details provided in Supplemental Material [28]).

The Hamiltonian of ttU𝑡superscript𝑡𝑈t-t^{\prime}-Uitalic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_U Hubbard model on a square lattice is given by

H=i,l,σ(tl,σci,σci+l,σ+h.c.)+Uini,ni,H=-\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}i,l,\sigma\end{subarray}}\left(t_{l,\sigma}c_{i,% \sigma}^{\dagger}c_{i+l,\sigma}+h.c.\right)+U\sum_{i}n_{i,\uparrow}n_{i,\downarrow}italic_H = - ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_i , italic_l , italic_σ end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i + italic_l , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_h . italic_c . ) + italic_U ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (1)

where ci,σsuperscriptsubscript𝑐𝑖𝜎c_{i,\sigma}^{\dagger}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (ci,σsuperscriptsubscript𝑐𝑖𝜎absentc_{i,\sigma}^{\,}italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) is electron creation (annihilation) operators with spin σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ = ,\uparrow,\downarrow↑ , ↓, and ni,σ=ci,σci,σsubscript𝑛𝑖𝜎superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑖𝜎subscript𝑐𝑖𝜎n_{i,\sigma}=c_{i,\sigma}^{\dagger}c_{i,\sigma}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the electron number operator. The electron hop** amplitude tl,σsubscript𝑡𝑙𝜎t_{l,\sigma}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l , italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where l=±x^,±y^𝑙plus-or-minus^𝑥plus-or-minus^𝑦l=\pm\hat{x},\pm\hat{y}italic_l = ± over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG , ± over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG represents the NN sites of a given site i𝑖iitalic_i, and l=±x^±y^𝑙plus-or-minusplus-or-minus^𝑥^𝑦l=\pm\hat{x}\pm\hat{y}italic_l = ± over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG ± over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG represents the NNN sites of a given site i𝑖iitalic_i. U<0𝑈0U<0italic_U < 0 is the on-site attractive interaction. For defining the spin-dependent anisotropic hop** amplitudes, we define the variable α𝛼\alphaitalic_α and α𝛼\alphaitalic_α’, where ty^=tx^=tsubscript𝑡^𝑦absentsubscript𝑡^𝑥absent𝑡t_{\hat{y}\downarrow}=t_{\hat{x}\uparrow}=titalic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t, tx^=ty^=αtsubscript𝑡^𝑥absentsubscript𝑡^𝑦absent𝛼𝑡t_{\hat{x}\downarrow}=t_{\hat{y}\uparrow}=\alpha titalic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_α italic_t (we set the NN hop** t𝑡titalic_t = 1 as the energy unit) and tx^y^=tx^+y^=tsubscript𝑡^𝑥^𝑦absentsubscript𝑡^𝑥^𝑦absentsuperscript𝑡t_{\hat{x}-\hat{y}\downarrow}=t_{\hat{x}+\hat{y}\uparrow}=t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG - over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG + over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, tx^+y^=tx^y^=αtsubscript𝑡^𝑥^𝑦absentsubscript𝑡^𝑥^𝑦absentsuperscript𝛼superscript𝑡t_{\hat{x}+\hat{y}\downarrow}=t_{\hat{x}-\hat{y}\uparrow}=\alpha^{\prime}t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG + over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG - over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, leading to an unpolarized system with balanced spin populations ni,=ni,=n/2delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑛𝑖delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑛𝑖𝑛2\langle n_{i,\uparrow}\rangle=\langle n_{i,\downarrow}\rangle=n/2⟨ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ = ⟨ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ = italic_n / 2. We give a schematic diagram with anisotropic NN and NNN hop** on 2D square lattice (see Fig. 1a), without loss of generality we defined the anisotropy parameter α,α[0,1]𝛼superscript𝛼01\alpha,\alpha^{\prime}\in[0,1]italic_α , italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∈ [ 0 , 1 ]. Such a Hubbard model with unequal hop** amplitudes can be readily implemented in an optical lattice by loading mixtures of ultracold fermionic atoms with different masses. The correlation functions of CPQMC are discussed in the Supplemental Material [28].

CPBM is an exotic non-superfluid paired state of fermions, the uncondensed Cooper pairs would form a collective state with low-energy gapless excitations along a Bose surface [14, 15]. In our recent work [17], we explore a diverse phase diagram as a function of electron density n𝑛nitalic_n and anisotropy α𝛼\alphaitalic_α in tU𝑡𝑈t-Uitalic_t - italic_U model, and reveal the emergence of a CPBM phase in a highly anisotropic regime with wide range of filling. These experiences are also applied to the ttU𝑡superscript𝑡𝑈t-t^{\prime}-Uitalic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_U model, so we now focus on a case with electron density n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65 at U=3𝑈3U=-3italic_U = - 3, and explore the influence of NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT on the ground state properties of the Bose metal phase. The CPBM phase in this parameter range is relatively stable on different lattice sizes. In this paper, we assume α=α𝛼superscript𝛼\alpha=\alpha^{\prime}italic_α = italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for simplicity.

As we demonstrate in Fig. 1(b), we observe a diverse phase diagram for different value of NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and anisotropy α𝛼\alphaitalic_α with electron filling n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65 at zero temperature. Overall, the exotic CPBM phase still exists in a strong anisotropy, emerging when a spin-dependent anisotropy suppresses the ordinary s𝑠sitalic_s-wave superfluid (s𝑠sitalic_s-SF). Fig. 1(c)-(e) shows the Bose surface in momentum space representing different values of t=0.2, 0.5, 0.8superscript𝑡0.20.50.8t^{\prime}=0.2,\ 0.5,\ 0.8italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.2 , 0.5 , 0.8 at extreme anisotropy α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05. IDW is an incommensurate density wave at extremely strong anisotropy range, and it disappears when t>0.4superscript𝑡0.4t^{\prime}>0.4italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 0.4. We can see that the Bose surface still exists, and the appearance of tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT does not significantly change the main properties of the CPBM phase, but it changed the shape and size of the Bose surface, which is mainly related to the Fermi surface distortion caused by spin anisotropy. However, the region of CPBM phase is affected by tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we can see from the phase diagram that as tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT increases, the area where CPBM exists presents a dome-like shape, the maximal area of CPBM phase occurs at around the optimal strength of t0.2similar-tosuperscript𝑡0.2t^{\prime}\sim 0.2italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 0.2, and then decreases in both small and large tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT regions. This indicates that the presence of the appropriate value of tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is beneficial for Bose metal phase. Further details on determining the various phase regions in the phase diagram from CPQMC data are presented in the Supplemental Material [28].

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) d𝑑ditalic_d-wave boson correlation. (a) and (b) (left panel) The schematic of the two-boson (on site pairing) dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave and dx2y2(2)subscriptsuperscript𝑑2superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(2)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave pairing in square lattice. (right panel) Two-boson correlator Pdxyboson(𝐤)subscript𝑃subscript𝑑𝑥𝑦𝑏𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑛𝐤P_{d_{xy}-boson}({\bf k})italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_b italic_o italic_s italic_o italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ), Pdx2y2(2)boson(𝐤)subscript𝑃subscriptsuperscript𝑑2superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2𝑏𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑛𝐤P_{d^{(2)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}-boson}({\bf k})italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_b italic_o italic_s italic_o italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) for t=0.2superscript𝑡0.2t^{\prime}=0.2italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.2 and 0.80.80.80.8 at α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05 with n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65 on 16 ×\times× 16 lattice, respectively. (c) Processes that would give origin to an effective ring-exchange Ktsubscript𝐾𝑡K_{t}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of pairs induced by t𝑡titalic_t anisotropy. (left) Fermions with opposite spin prefer to move along perpendicular directions. (d) Processes that would give origin to an effective ring-exchange Ktsubscript𝐾superscript𝑡K_{t^{\prime}}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of pairs induced by tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT anisotropy. (left) Fermions with opposite spin prefer to move along diagonal directions perpendicularly.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online) Competition between dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave and dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave boson correlation. The strength of four pairing modes of bosons paired correlation at α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05 with n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65 varies with different tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The inset shows boson pairing correlations in the real space for t=0.2superscript𝑡0.2t^{\prime}=0.2italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.2 and 0.80.80.80.8, marked by the black dashed lines.

One of the most important prospect of the Bose metal phase is its d𝑑ditalic_d-wave correlation between bosons (on-site pairing) [15, 17]. We defined the two-boson correlator Pζboson(𝐤)subscript𝑃𝜁𝑏𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑛𝐤P_{\mathrm{\zeta}-boson}({\bf k})italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ - italic_b italic_o italic_s italic_o italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) to study the possibility of a phase of Cooper pairs. Here ζ=s,dxy,dx2y2(1),dx2y2(2)𝜁𝑠subscript𝑑𝑥𝑦subscriptsuperscript𝑑1superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2subscriptsuperscript𝑑2superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2\zeta=s,\ d_{xy},\ d^{(1)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}},\ d^{(2)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_ζ = italic_s , italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Among them, the dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave is divided into two types, namely the NN and the third NN dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave, which we use dx2y2(1)subscriptsuperscript𝑑1superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(1)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave and dx2y2(2)subscriptsuperscript𝑑2superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(2)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave to represent. Our previous results [17] suggest that the correlation between Cooper pairs is predominantly dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave in the CPBM regime when there is no tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in 2D system.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (Color online) Characteristic of CPBM phase. (a)-(c) Non-interacting energy spectrum of the spin-dependent Fermi surface with anisotropy α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05 for t=0.2, 0.5, 0.8superscript𝑡0.20.50.8t^{\prime}=0.2,\ 0.5,\ 0.8italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.2 , 0.5 , 0.8 at filling n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65. The Fermi surface is projected as red (blue) lines for the up-spin (down-spin). We provide an illustration of pairing with nonzero momentum. (d) The s𝑠sitalic_s-wave pairing correlation function in the CPBM phase and the s𝑠sitalic_s-SF phase in real space. The solid blue line is an exponential fitting curve. The inset is lattice size effect in CPBM phase and s𝑠sitalic_s-SF phase.

In left panel of Fig. 2(a) and Fig. 2(b), we give the schematic of the two-boson dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave pairing correlations on the diagonals in square lattice and dx2y2(2)subscriptsuperscript𝑑2superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(2)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave pairing correlations on the third NN sites. The d𝑑ditalic_d-wave here specifically refers to dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-orbital or dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-orbital symmetry, which exhibits a propensity to introduce d𝑑ditalic_d-wave correlations into the system and qualitatively alter the sign structure of the electronic ground state. We show the CPQMC simulation results of two-boson correlator Pζboson(𝐤)subscript𝑃𝜁𝑏𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑛𝐤P_{\mathrm{\zeta}-boson}({\bf k})italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ - italic_b italic_o italic_s italic_o italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k ) in momentum space for α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05 at different t=0.2superscript𝑡0.2t^{\prime}=0.2italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.2 and t=0.8superscript𝑡0.8t^{\prime}=0.8italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.8, ζ=dxy,dx2y2(2)𝜁subscript𝑑𝑥𝑦subscriptsuperscript𝑑2superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2\zeta=\ d_{xy},\ d^{(2)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_ζ = italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, respectively. In the highly anisotropic limit, the process depicted in Fig. 2(c) and (d) dominates, corresponding to dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave and dx2y2(2)subscriptsuperscript𝑑2superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(2)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave boson correlations induced by t𝑡titalic_t and tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, respectively.

By model map**, we provided the connection between our model of fermions with spin-dependent anisotropic Fermi surface to the bosonic JK𝐽𝐾J-Kitalic_J - italic_K model. When |U|tmuch-greater-than𝑈𝑡\left|U\right|\gg t| italic_U | ≫ italic_t, all of the fermions are considered to be tightly bound into on-site Cooper pairs. We can derive an effective boson Hamiltonian by considering a perturbation expansion in powers of t/|U|𝑡𝑈t/\left|U\right|italic_t / | italic_U | [29, 14, 17, 15]. For ttU𝑡superscript𝑡𝑈t-t^{\prime}-Uitalic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_U model, the effective Hamiltonian can be written as: Hb=Ji,jbibj+Ktringb1b2b3b4+Ktringb1b2b3b4+h.c.formulae-sequencesubscript𝐻𝑏𝐽subscript𝑖𝑗superscriptsubscript𝑏𝑖subscript𝑏𝑗subscript𝐾𝑡subscript𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔superscriptsubscript𝑏1subscript𝑏2superscriptsubscript𝑏3subscript𝑏4subscript𝐾superscript𝑡subscriptsuperscript𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔superscriptsubscript𝑏1subscript𝑏2superscriptsubscript𝑏3subscript𝑏4𝑐H_{b}=-J\sum_{i,j}b_{i}^{\dagger}b_{j}+K_{t}\sum_{ring}b_{1}^{\dagger}b_{2}b_{% 3}^{\dagger}b_{4}+K_{t^{\prime}}\sum^{\prime}_{ring}b_{1}^{\dagger}b_{2}b_{3}^% {\dagger}b_{4}+h.c.italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - italic_J ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i , italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r italic_i italic_n italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r italic_i italic_n italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_h . italic_c .. Here, we consider the boson ring-exchange term Ktsubscript𝐾𝑡K_{t}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Ktsubscript𝐾superscript𝑡K_{t^{\prime}}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as depicted in Fig. 2(c) and (d), which involves two bosons on opposite corners of an elementary square plaquette and rhomboid plaquette rotating by ±90plus-or-minus90\pm 90± 90 degrees. Here, bi=cicisuperscriptsubscript𝑏𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑐𝑖absentsuperscriptsubscript𝑐𝑖absentb_{i}^{\dagger}=c_{i\uparrow}^{\dagger}c_{i\downarrow}^{\dagger}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ↑ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i ↓ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, Ktsubscript𝐾𝑡K_{t}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT corresponds to i=1,2,3,4𝑖1234i=1,2,3,4italic_i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 labeling sites taken clockwise around a square plaquette, Ktsubscript𝐾superscript𝑡K_{t^{\prime}}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT corresponds to i=1,2,3,4𝑖1234i=1,2,3,4italic_i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 labeling sites taken clockwise around a rhomboid plaquette. Remarkably, in the extreme anisotropic limit, the ring terms Ktsubscript𝐾𝑡K_{t}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Ktsubscript𝐾superscript𝑡K_{t^{\prime}}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT which hops pairs of bosons is nonzero, they can even be comparable to the spin exchange coupling term J𝐽Jitalic_J. At the same time as the Ktsubscript𝐾superscript𝑡K_{t^{\prime}}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ring exchange term induced by tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT anisotropy, the boson in the ring exchange may also have a boson correlation with another NN boson. In addition, we also provide the physical mechanism for enhancing dx2y2(1)subscriptsuperscript𝑑1superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(1)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave by Ktsubscript𝐾superscript𝑡K_{t^{\prime}}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Supplemental Material [28]. Particularly, with increasing tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the coupling strength Ktsubscript𝐾superscript𝑡K_{t^{\prime}}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT becomes increasingly more important in the system, leading to the dx2y2(1)subscriptsuperscript𝑑1superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(1)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave and dx2y2(2)subscriptsuperscript𝑑2superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(2)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave all becoming more important.

We demonstrated changes in the strength of four pairing modes of boson paired correlation by fixing α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05 at n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65 and changing the NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (Fig. 3). Overall, the primary competition arises between dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave and two types of dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave, while s𝑠sitalic_s-wave holds relatively less significance with a small value and the three types of d𝑑ditalic_d-waves have relatively high values in CPBM region. As tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT increases, the intensity of the dx2y2(1)subscriptsuperscript𝑑1superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(1)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave boson correlation increases and the dx2y2(2)subscriptsuperscript𝑑2superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d^{(2)}_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave does not change much, the proportion of the dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave boson correlation decreases, and ultimately the dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave dominates when t>0.7superscript𝑡0.7t^{\prime}>0.7italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 0.7. In the inset of Fig. 3, we compare the correlations between four pairing modes of boson pairs in real space for t=0.2superscript𝑡0.2t^{\prime}=0.2italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.2 and 0.80.80.80.8 (the parameters consistent with right panel of Fig. 2(a) and Fig. 2(b)). They all decay rapidly to zero, indicating that the boson correlation is short-range. The strength of the dxysubscript𝑑𝑥𝑦d_{xy}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave boson correlation is the strongest when t=0.2superscript𝑡0.2t^{\prime}=0.2italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.2, while two types of dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave dominate when t=0.8superscript𝑡0.8t^{\prime}=0.8italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.8. Overall, we suggest its predominant boson pairing mode is always d𝑑ditalic_d-wave character in Bose metal phase. Particularly, our CPQMC results indicate that the system tends toward dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave correlation between Cooper pairs when tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is large (t>0.7superscript𝑡0.7t^{\prime}>0.7italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 0.7), and tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT being a key tuning parameter to adjust the intensity of boson correlation in the boson metallic phase. This exotic phase of boson-paired states can be termed the d𝑑ditalic_d-wave Bose Metal [30, 15, 18, 17].

We show the non-interacting energy dispersion with anisotropy α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05 for t=0.2, 0.5, 0.8superscript𝑡0.20.50.8t^{\prime}=0.2,\ 0.5,\ 0.8italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0.2 , 0.5 , 0.8 in Fig. 4(a)-(c). The solid red and blue lines below indicate the anisotropic Fermi surface of spin-up and spin-down for a projection at n0.65similar-to𝑛0.65n\sim 0.65italic_n ∼ 0.65. Due to the severe mismatch Fermi surface, fermions with different spin near the Fermi surface favor forming pairs at finite momentum. The previous mean-field study restricts the pairing between patches of fermions with opposite spin located along a specific direction [29]. Here our quantum Monte Carlo result considers the influence of all possible pairing channel with the restriction. We provide an illustration of nonzero momentum pairing in Fig. 4(a)-(c), respectively. Pairs with different finite momentum are formed by the spin-up and spin-down fermions at different parts of anistropic Fermi surface, constituting a continuous Bose surface with singular pair distribution function, as shown in Fig. 1(c)-(e), the maximum weight of pairing is relatively evenly distributed on the Bose surface. The shape and sharpness of the Bose surface are regulated by both the filling n𝑛nitalic_n and hop** anisotropy α𝛼\alphaitalic_α and the NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

The presence of anisotropy α𝛼\alphaitalic_α induces a mismatch between the spin-up and spin-down Fermi surfaces, while tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT distorts the shape of the Fermi surface. As tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT increases, this distortion intensifies. When the distortion is significant, the rotation of the anisotropic Fermi surface from the t=0superscript𝑡0t^{\prime}=0italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0 limit becomes pronounced. At the t=tsuperscript𝑡𝑡t^{\prime}=titalic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_t limit, the elliptic Fermi surfaces almost orient along the kx±kyplus-or-minussubscript𝑘𝑥subscript𝑘𝑦k_{x}\pm k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ± italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT direction. Consequently, the resulting Bose surface in the CPBM phase also rotates accordingly, as illustrated. This leads to closed Fermi surfaces forming at small to medium filling. Previous studies have pointed out that the openness of the Fermi surfaces is crucial in classifying the Bose metal, resulting in d𝑑ditalic_d-wave Local Bose Liquid (DLBL) with an open Fermi surface and d𝑑ditalic_d-wave Bose Liquid (DBL) with a closed Fermi surface [29]. The analogous CPBM phase to DBL can be realized by introducing a sufficiently large tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, whereas previous studies of CPBM mostly correspond to DLBL due to the open nature of the Fermi surfaces.

Fig. 4(d) compares the CPQMC simulation results of the pair correlation function for CPBM phase and s𝑠sitalic_s-SF phase in real space. In particularly, the correlation in real space decay to zero quickly and fluctuate around zero with increasing distance in CPBM phase, showing that correlation is short-range, and there is no significant difference as tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT changes. On the contrary, the correlation exhibits an exponential decay, and converges to a steady finite value at long distance in s𝑠sitalic_s-SF phase, this is the hallmark of the long-range superconducting correlation among Cooper pairs. Inset of Fig. 4(d) show the lattice size effect in different phases, we can see that in CPBM region when α=0.05𝛼0.05\alpha=0.05italic_α = 0.05, the value of Nspair(𝐤max)subscript𝑁s𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑟subscript𝐤maxN_{\mathrm{s}-pair}({\bf k}_{\rm max})italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s - italic_p italic_a italic_i italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) has always been stable, which represents that the CPBM phase will always exist in large or even infinite lattice size. When α=1.00𝛼1.00\alpha=1.00italic_α = 1.00, the system is s𝑠sitalic_s-SF phase, the value of Nspair(𝐤max)subscript𝑁s𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑟subscript𝐤maxN_{\mathrm{s}-pair}({\bf k}_{\rm max})italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_s - italic_p italic_a italic_i italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is continuously increasing, so s𝑠sitalic_s-SF is significantly diverge at weak anisotropic region.

In recent years, charge order or charge density wave (CDW)—a static periodic modulation of charge density and lattice positions driven by the Fermi surface, has been shown to be a universal property of cuprates [31] and other unconventional superconductors [32]. IDW along the lattice diagonals exists at strong anisotropy, displaying singular features condenses at nonzero momentum point 𝐐𝐐\bf Qbold_Q = (2kF2subscript𝑘𝐹2k_{F}2 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, 2kF2subscript𝑘𝐹2k_{F}2 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT), gradually diffusing to point 𝐐𝐐\bf Qbold_Q = (π𝜋\piitalic_π, π𝜋\piitalic_π) convert to CDW as n𝑛nitalic_n approached to half filling [17]. We also explore the influence of tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT on density wave and associated periodicity. We demonstrate that IDW disappears when t>0.4superscript𝑡0.4t^{\prime}>0.4italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 0.4 in phase diagram, suggesting that too large tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is not conducive to the formation of IDW. We have discussed the influence of tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT on density wave and associated periodicity in details in the Supplemental Material [28].

To conclude, we utilize the CPQMC algorithm to study the effect of the NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT on the CPBM phase and its boson correlation in 2D lattice. In the highly anisotropic regime (α<0.40𝛼0.40\alpha<0.40italic_α < 0.40) at filling nsimilar-to\sim0.65 for various tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values, we observe the presence of Bose surface in Cooper-pair distribution function, which is compelling evidence of the CPBM phase. Furthermore, the CPBM region in phase diagram exhibits a dome-like shape, with the maximal CPBM phase region occurring at around the optimal strength of t0.2similar-tosuperscript𝑡0.2t^{\prime}\sim 0.2italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∼ 0.2, and then decreases in both small and large tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT regions. Subsequently, we explored the existence of boson correlation, suggesting that the boson correlation between Cooper pairs is predominantly dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave in the CPBM regime with large tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (t>0.7superscript𝑡0.7t^{\prime}>0.7italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 0.7). We also argued that the necessary condition to form CPBM phase is the anisotropy of the Fermi surface caused by strong spin anisotropy.

Recently, spin-dependent anisotropic Fermi surfaces have garnered significant attention in condensed matter physics, particularly in the context of altermagnetism [33, 34]. A recent study theoretically proposed how a d𝑑ditalic_d-wave altermagnetic phase can be realized with ultracold fermionic atoms in optical lattices, which in a altermagnetic Hubbard model with anisotropic NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [35]. The dx2y2subscript𝑑superscript𝑥2superscript𝑦2d_{x^{2}-y^{2}}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-wave Bose metal phase can be realized in optical lattice experiments by tuning the filling and hop** anisotropy of effective spin interactions with light. Our results demonstrate that the properties of Bose metal phase is strongly affected by modifications of the NNN hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in Hubbard model. This provides valuable guidance for ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices, which can be microscopically engineered and measured to investigate these exotic phases within specific parameter ranges.

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12204130), Shenzhen Start-Up Research Funds (Grant No. HA11409065), HITSZ Start-Up Funds (Grant No. X2022000), Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional CarbonMaterials Research and Comprehensive Application (Grant No. ZDSYS20220527171407017). T.Y. acknowledges supports from Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (No. YQ2023A004).

References

  • Bednorz and Müller [1986] J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Müller, Possible high Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐{T}_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT superconductivity in the Ba--La--Cu--O system, Z Physik B 64, 189 (1986).
  • Lee et al. [2006] P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Do** a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006).
  • Keimer et al. [2015] B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature 518, 179 (2015).
  • Singh [2021] N. Singh, Leading theories of the cuprate superconductivity: A critique, Physica C Supercond 580, 1353782 (2021).
  • Hashimoto et al. [2014] M. Hashimoto, I. M. Vishik, R.-H. He, T. P. Devereaux, and Z.-X. Shen, Energy gaps in high-transition-temperature cuprate superconductors, Nature Physics 10, 483 (2014).
  • Anderson [1987] P. W. Anderson, The Resonating Valence Bond State in La2CuO4 and Superconductivity, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
  • Zhang and Rice [1988] F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective Hamiltonian for the superconducting Cu oxides, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 37, 3759 (1988).
  • Gu et al. [2005] Z. C. Gu, T. Li, and Z. Y. Weng, Pseudogap phase: Exchange energy driven versus kinetic energy driven, Phys. Rev. B 71, 064502 (2005).
  • Phillips and Dalidovich [2003] P. Phillips and D. Dalidovich, The elusive Bose metal, Science 302, 243 (2003).
  • Yang et al. [2022] C. Yang, H. Liu, Y. Liu, J. Wang, D. Qiu, S. Wang, Y. Wang, Q. He, X. Li, P. Li, Y. Tang, J. Wang, X. C. Xie, J. M. Valles, Jr, J. Xiong, and Y. Li, Signatures of a strange metal in a bosonic system, Nature 601, 205 (2022).
  • [11] Q. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Boyack, S. Yang, and K. Levin, When superconductivity crosses over: From BCS to BEC, Reviews of modern physics 96, 025002.
  • Block et al. [2011a] M. S. Block, R. V. Mishmash, R. K. Kaul, D. N. Sheng, O. I. Motrunich, and M. P. A. Fisher, Exotic gapless mott insulators of bosons on multileg ladders, Physical review letters 106, 046402 (2011a).
  • Mishmash et al. [2011] R. V. Mishmash, M. S. Block, R. K. Kaul, D. N. Sheng, O. I. Motrunich, and M. P. A. Fisher, Bose metals and insulators on multileg ladders with ring exchange, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 84, 245127 (2011).
  • Feiguin and Fisher [2009] A. E. Feiguin and M. P. A. Fisher, Exotic paired states with anisotropic spin-dependent Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 025303 (2009).
  • Feiguin and Fisher [2011] A. E. Feiguin and M. P. A. Fisher, Exotic paired phases in ladders with spin-dependent hop**, Phys. Rev. B 83, 115104 (2011).
  • Block et al. [2011b] M. S. Block, D. N. Sheng, O. I. Motrunich, and M. P. A. Fisher, Spin Bose-metal and valence bond solid phases in a spin-1/2 model with ring exchanges on a four-leg triangular ladder, Physical review letters 106, 157202 (2011b).
  • Cao et al. [2024] Z. Cao, J. Su, J. Li, T. Ying, W. Wang, J.-H. Sun, H.-K. Tang, and H. Lin, Exotic d-wave bose metal in two dimensions (2024), arXiv:2405.13405 [cond-mat.supr-con] .
  • Jiang et al. [2013] H.-C. Jiang, M. S. Block, R. V. Mishmash, J. R. Garrison, D. N. Sheng, O. I. Motrunich, and M. P. A. Fisher, Non-Fermi-liquid d-wave metal phase of strongly interacting electrons, Nature 493, 39 (2013).
  • Huang et al. [2001] Z. B. Huang, H. Q. Lin, and J. E. Gubernatis, Quantum Monte Carlo study of Spin, Charge, and Pairing correlations in the ttU𝑡superscript𝑡𝑈t-t^{\prime}-Uitalic_t - italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_U Hubbard model, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 64, 205101 (2001).
  • Wachtel et al. [2017] G. Wachtel, S. Baruch, and D. Orgad, Optimal inhomogeneity for pairing in Hubbard systems with next-nearest-neighbor hop**, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 96, 064527 (2017).
  • Yang et al. [2020] S. Yang, T. Ying, W. Li, J. Yang, X. Sun, and X. Li, Quantum monte carlo study of the hubbard model with next-nearest-neighbor hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT: pairing and magnetism, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33, 115601 (2020).
  • Jiang and Devereaux [2019] H.-C. Jiang and T. P. Devereaux, Superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next-nearest hop** tsuperscript𝑡t^{\prime}italic_t start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTScience 365, 1424 (2019).
  • The Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem et al. [2020] The Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Problem, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, S. Zhang, U. Schollwöck, and S. R. White, Plaquette versus ordinary d-wave pairing in the t{}^{{}^{\prime}}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT-Hubbard model on a width-4 cylinder, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 102, 041106 (2020).
  • Hirayama et al. [2018] M. Hirayama, Y. Yamaji, T. Misawa, and M. Imada, Ab initio effective Hamiltonians for cuprate superconductors, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 98, 134501 (2018).
  • Hirayama et al. [2019] M. Hirayama, T. Misawa, T. Ohgoe, Y. Yamaji, and M. Imada, Effective Hamiltonian for cuprate superconductors derived from multiscale ab initio scheme with level renormalization, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 99, 245155 (2019).
  • Zhang et al. [1995] S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. E. Gubernatis, Constrained path quantum Monte Carlo method for fermion ground states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3652 (1995).
  • Zhang et al. [1997] S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. E. Gubernatis, Constrained path Monte Carlo method for fermion ground states, Phys. Rev. B 55, 7464 (1997).
  • [28] See Supplemental Material, which includes Ref. [36], for details on the method and additional simulation results.
  • Motrunich and Fisher [2007] O. I. Motrunich and M. P. A. Fisher, d𝑑ditalic_d-wave correlated critical Bose liquids in two dimensions, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 75, 235116 (2007).
  • Sheng et al. [2008] D. N. Sheng, O. I. Motrunich, S. Trebst, E. Gull, and M. P. A. Fisher, Strong-coupling phases of frustrated bosons on a two-leg ladder with ring exchange, Phys. Rev. B 78, 054520 (2008).
  • Comin and Damascelli [2016] R. Comin and A. Damascelli, Resonant x-ray scattering studies of charge order in cuprates, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 369 (2016).
  • Teng et al. [2022] X. Teng, L. Chen, F. Ye, E. Rosenberg, Z. Liu, J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, J. S. Oh, M. Z. Hasan, K. J. Neubauer, B. Gao, Y. Xie, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, R. J. Birgeneau, J.-H. Chu, M. Yi, and P. Dai, Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome lattice antiferromagnet, Nature 609, 490 (2022).
  • Šmejkal et al. [2022a] L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022a).
  • Šmejkal et al. [2022b] L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022b).
  • Das et al. [2023] P. Das, V. Leeb, J. Knolle, and M. Knap, Realizing Altermagnetism in Fermi-Hubbard Models with Ultracold Atoms (2023), arXiv:2312.10151 [cond-mat.quant-gas] .
  • Loh et al. [1990] E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, R. T. Scalettar, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Sign problem in the numerical simulation of many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9301 (1990).