Nicholas Proudfoot, Yuan Xu, and Benjamin Young
Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon,
Eugene, OR 97403
1 Introduction
Given a graph, a series extension is a graph obtained by subdividing an edge, and a parallel extension is a graph obtained by adding a new edge parallel to an existing one.
A graph is called series-parallel if it can be constructed from a 2-cycle by a sequence of series and parallel extensions. By convention, a single edge
and a single loop
are also considered series-parallel graphs. A matroid associated with a series-parallel graph is called a series-parallel matroid . A series-parallel matroid is simple if and only if it comes from
a graph with no loops or parallel edges.
A (possibly empty) direct sum of series-parallel matroids is called quasi series-parallel ; this is the same as taking matroids associated with disjoint unions of series-parallel graphs. A quasi series-parallel matroid is
simple if and only if each of its components is simple. Quasi series-parallel matroids are characterized by the property of having no minors equal to the uniform matroid of rank 2 on 4 elements or
the matroid associated with the complete graph K 4 subscript πΎ 4 K_{4} italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [FL24 , Proposition 2.1] . The rank of a quasi series-parallel matroid is equal to the number of vertices minus the number of connected components of the corresponding graph.
Consider the following quantities:
C n , k subscript πΆ π π
\displaystyle C_{n,k} italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= the number of series-parallel matroids onΒ [ n ] Β of rankΒ k absent the number of series-parallel matroids onΒ [ n ] Β of rankΒ k \displaystyle=\text{the number of series-parallel matroids on $[n]$ of rank $k%
$ } = the number of series-parallel matroids on [ italic_n ] of rank italic_k
[OEIS , A140945]
E n , k subscript πΈ π π
\displaystyle E_{n,k} italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= the number of simple series-parallel matroids onΒ [ n ] Β of rankΒ k absent the number of simple series-parallel matroids onΒ [ n ] Β of rankΒ k \displaystyle=\text{the number of simple series-parallel matroids on $[n]$ of %
rank $k$} = the number of simple series-parallel matroids on [ italic_n ] of rank italic_k
[OEIS , A361355]
A n , k subscript π΄ π π
\displaystyle A_{n,k} italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= the number of quasi series-parallel matroids onΒ [ n ] Β of rankΒ k absent the number of quasi series-parallel matroids onΒ [ n ] Β of rankΒ k \displaystyle=\text{the number of quasi series-parallel matroids on $[n]$ of %
rank $k$} = the number of quasi series-parallel matroids on [ italic_n ] of rank italic_k
[OEIS , A359985]
S n , k subscript π π π
\displaystyle S_{n,k} italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= the number of simple quasi series-parallel matroids onΒ [ n ] Β of rankΒ k absent the number of simple quasi series-parallel matroids onΒ [ n ] Β of rankΒ k \displaystyle=\text{the number of simple quasi series-parallel matroids on $[n%
]$ of rank $k$} = the number of simple quasi series-parallel matroids on [ italic_n ] of rank italic_k
[OEIS , A361353]
Consider the following generating functions:
E β’ ( x , y ) πΈ π₯ π¦ \displaystyle E(x,y) italic_E ( italic_x , italic_y )
:= assign \displaystyle:= :=
β n = 1 β β k = 0 n E n , k β’ y k β’ x n n ! , S β’ ( x , y ) := β n = 0 β β k = 0 n S n , k β’ y k β’ x n n ! assign superscript subscript π 1 superscript subscript π 0 π subscript πΈ π π
superscript π¦ π superscript π₯ π π π π₯ π¦
superscript subscript π 0 superscript subscript π 0 π subscript π π π
superscript π¦ π superscript π₯ π π \displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=0}^{n}E_{n,k}\,y^{k}\frac{x^{n}}{n!},%
\qquad S(x,y):=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\sum_{k=0}^{n}S_{n,k}\,y^{k}\frac{x^{n}}{n!} β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG , italic_S ( italic_x , italic_y ) := β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG
C β’ ( x , y ) πΆ π₯ π¦ \displaystyle C(x,y) italic_C ( italic_x , italic_y )
:= assign \displaystyle:= :=
β n = 1 β β k = 0 n C n , k β’ y k β’ x n n ! , A β’ ( x , y ) := β n = 0 β β k = 0 n A n , k β’ y k β’ x n n ! . assign superscript subscript π 1 superscript subscript π 0 π subscript πΆ π π
superscript π¦ π superscript π₯ π π π΄ π₯ π¦
superscript subscript π 0 superscript subscript π 0 π subscript π΄ π π
superscript π¦ π superscript π₯ π π \displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=0}^{n}C_{n,k}\,y^{k}\frac{x^{n}}{n!},%
\qquad A(x,y):=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_{n,k}\,y^{k}\frac{x^{n}}{n!}. β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG , italic_A ( italic_x , italic_y ) := β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG .
Note that the two generating functions on the left begin with n = 1 π 1 n=1 italic_n = 1 , while the two on the right begin with n = 0 π 0 n=0 italic_n = 0 ;
this is because the empty matroid is quasi series-parallel but not series-parallel.
The combinatorial relationships between these numbers can be expressed in terms of their generating functions.
Proposition 1.4 .
We have the following identities:
S β’ ( x , y ) π π₯ π¦ \displaystyle S(x,y) italic_S ( italic_x , italic_y )
= \displaystyle= =
e E β’ ( x , y ) superscript π πΈ π₯ π¦ \displaystyle e^{E(x,y)} italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_E ( italic_x , italic_y ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
A β’ ( x , y ) π΄ π₯ π¦ \displaystyle A(x,y) italic_A ( italic_x , italic_y )
= \displaystyle= =
e C β’ ( x , y ) superscript π πΆ π₯ π¦ \displaystyle e^{C(x,y)} italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_C ( italic_x , italic_y ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
C β’ ( x , y ) πΆ π₯ π¦ \displaystyle C(x,y) italic_C ( italic_x , italic_y )
= \displaystyle= =
E β’ ( e x β 1 , y ) + x πΈ superscript π π₯ 1 π¦ π₯ \displaystyle E(e^{x}-1,y)+x italic_E ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 , italic_y ) + italic_x
A β’ ( x , y ) π΄ π₯ π¦ \displaystyle A(x,y) italic_A ( italic_x , italic_y )
= \displaystyle= =
S β’ ( e x β 1 , y ) β
e x β
π superscript π π₯ 1 π¦ superscript π π₯ \displaystyle S(e^{x}-1,y)\cdot e^{x} italic_S ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 , italic_y ) β
italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
A π΄ A italic_A C πΆ C italic_C S π S italic_S E πΈ E italic_E exponentiate exponentiate precompose with Β e x β 1 and multiply by Β e x precompose with Β e x β 1 and multiply by Β e x
\begin{subarray}{c}\text{{\em precompose}}\\
\text{{\em with} $e^{x}-1$}\\
\text{{\em and multiply}}\\
\text{{\em by} $e^{x}$}\end{subarray} start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL precompose end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL normal_with italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL and multiply end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL normal_by italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG precompose with Β e x β 1 and add Β x precompose with Β e x β 1 and add Β x
\begin{subarray}{c}\text{{\em precompose}}\\
\text{{\em with} $e^{x}-1$}\\
\text{{\em and add} $x$}\end{subarray} start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL precompose end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL normal_with italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL normal_and normal_add italic_x end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG
Proof.
A quasi series-parallel matroid on [ n ] delimited-[] π [n] [ italic_n ] is given by a partition of [ n ] delimited-[] π [n] [ italic_n ] along with a series-parallel matroid on each part, and
it is simple if and only if each component is simple. This fact, combined with [Sta24 , Corollary 5.1.6] , implies the first two identities.
When n β₯ 2 π 2 n\geq 2 italic_n β₯ 2 , a series-parallel matroid on [ n ] delimited-[] π [n] [ italic_n ] is given by a partition of [ n ] delimited-[] π [n] [ italic_n ] into parallel classes and a simple series-parallel matroid on the set of parallel classes.
This observation, combined with [Sta24 , Theorem 5.1.4] , implies the third identity.
(The addition of x π₯ x italic_x comes from the matroid of rank 0 on the set [ 1 ] delimited-[] 1 [1] [ 1 ] , which is series-parallel but not simple.)
Finally, a quasi series-parallel matroid on [ n ] delimited-[] π [n] [ italic_n ] is given by a set of loops, a partition of the nonloops into parallel classes, and a simple series-parallel matroid on the set of parallel classes.
This statement implies the fourth identity by [Sta24 , Proposition 5.1.1 and Theorem 5.1.4] , with the factor of e x superscript π π₯ e^{x} italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT corresponding to the choice of the set of loops.
β
We focus here on the numbers E n , k subscript πΈ π π
E_{n,k} italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , from which all of the others can be computed.
We know that we have E n , k = 0 subscript πΈ π π
0 E_{n,k}=0 italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 when n β₯ 2 β’ k > 0 π 2 π 0 n\geq 2k>0 italic_n β₯ 2 italic_k > 0 [FL24 , Proposition 2.10] .
Theorem 1.5 provides formulas for E 2 β’ k β 1 , k subscript πΈ 2 π 1 π
E_{2k-1,k} italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_k - 1 , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [FL24 , Corollary 2.12] and E 2 β’ k β 2 , k subscript πΈ 2 π 2 π
E_{2k-2,k} italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_k - 2 , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
[GPYZ , Corollary 1.6] .
Theorem 1.5 .
[ FL24 , GPYZ ]
We have
E 2 β’ k β 1 , k ( 2 β’ k β 1 ) !! = ( 2 β’ k β 1 ) k β 3 and E 2 β’ k β 2 , k ( 2 β’ k β 3 ) !! = ( 2 β’ k β 1 ) k β 2 β ( 2 β’ k β 2 ) k β 2 + 2 3 β’ ( k β 2 ) β’ ( 2 β’ k β 2 ) k β 3 . formulae-sequence subscript πΈ 2 π 1 π
double-factorial 2 π 1 superscript 2 π 1 π 3 and
subscript πΈ 2 π 2 π
double-factorial 2 π 3 superscript 2 π 1 π 2 superscript 2 π 2 π 2 2 3 π 2 superscript 2 π 2 π 3 \frac{E_{2k-1,k}}{(2k-1)!!}=(2k-1)^{k-3}\qquad\text{and}\qquad\frac{E_{2k-2,k}%
}{(2k-3)!!}=(2k-1)^{k-2}-(2k-2)^{k-2}+\frac{2}{3}(k-2)(2k-2)^{k-3}. divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_k - 1 , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_k - 1 ) !! end_ARG = ( 2 italic_k - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_k - 2 , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_k - 3 ) !! end_ARG = ( 2 italic_k - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( 2 italic_k - 2 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( italic_k - 2 ) ( 2 italic_k - 2 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .
Our goal in this note is to provide a formula for E 2 β’ k β r , k subscript πΈ 2 π π π
E_{2k-r,k} italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_k - italic_r , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for arbitrary k π k italic_k and r π r italic_r .
Our formula becomes more complicated as r π r italic_r grows. It can be used to recover Theorem 1.5 ,
and we also use it to provide an explicit closed formula for the next case E 2 β’ k β 3 , k subscript πΈ 2 π 3 π
E_{2k-3,k} italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_k - 3 , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Example 1.7 ).
Consider
the unsigned associated Stirling number of the first kind
[ [ n k ] ] = ( n β 1 ) β’ [ [ n β 2 k β 1 ] ] + ( n β 1 ) β’ [ [ n β 1 k ] ] , delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix π π π 1 delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix π 2 π 1 π 1 delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix π 1 π {\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}n\\
k\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}=(n-1){\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}n-2\\
k-1\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}+(n-1){\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}n-1\\
k\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}, [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] = ( italic_n - 1 ) [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n - 2 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_k - 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] + ( italic_n - 1 ) [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] ,
(1)
which counts the number of derangements
of [ n ] delimited-[] π [n] [ italic_n ] with k π k italic_k cycles [Com74 , page 256] . This quantity vanishes when n < 2 β’ k π 2 π n<2k italic_n < 2 italic_k , and Equation (1 )
implies the following formulas when n π n italic_n is close to 2 β’ k 2 π 2k 2 italic_k :
[ [ 2 β’ k k ] ] = ( 2 β’ k β 1 ) !! , [ [ 2 β’ k + 1 k ] ] = 2 3 β’ k β’ ( 2 β’ k + 1 ) !! , and [ [ 2 β’ k + 2 k ] ] = 1 9 β’ ( 4 β’ k + 5 ) β’ ( k + 1 ) β’ k β’ ( 2 β’ k + 1 ) !! . formulae-sequence delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix 2 π π double-factorial 2 π 1 formulae-sequence delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix 2 π 1 π 2 3 π double-factorial 2 π 1 and
delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix 2 π 2 π 1 9 4 π 5 π 1 π double-factorial 2 π 1 {\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}2k\\
k\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}=(2k-1)!!,\quad{\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}2k+1%
\\
k\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}=\frac{2}{3}k\,(2k+1)!!,\quad\text{and}\quad{%
\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}2k+2\\
k\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}=\frac{1}{9}(4k+5)(k+1)k\,(2k+1)!!. [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 2 italic_k end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] = ( 2 italic_k - 1 ) !! , [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 2 italic_k + 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] = divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_k ( 2 italic_k + 1 ) !! , and [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 2 italic_k + 2 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 9 end_ARG ( 4 italic_k + 5 ) ( italic_k + 1 ) italic_k ( 2 italic_k + 1 ) !! .
Theorem 1.6 .
For all 0 β€ r β€ k 0 π π 0\leq r\leq k 0 β€ italic_r β€ italic_k , we have
E 2 β’ k β r , k = β p = 1 r [ [ 2 β’ k β p β 1 k β p ] ] β’ β i = 0 r β p ( β 1 ) i + p + 1 β’ ( 2 β’ k β p β i ) k β p β 1 i ! β’ ( r β p β i ) ! . subscript πΈ 2 π π π
superscript subscript π 1 π delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix 2 π π 1 π π superscript subscript π 0 π π superscript 1 π π 1 superscript 2 π π π π π 1 π π π π E_{2k-r,k}=\sum_{p=1}^{r}{\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}2k-p-1\\
k-p\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}\sum_{i=0}^{r-p}\frac{(-1)^{i+p+1}(2k-p-i)^{k-%
p-1}}{i!(r-p-i)!}. italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_k - italic_r , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL 2 italic_k - italic_p - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_k - italic_p end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r - italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i + italic_p + 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 italic_k - italic_p - italic_i ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - italic_p - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_i ! ( italic_r - italic_p - italic_i ) ! end_ARG .
Example 1.7 .
When r = 1 π 1 r=1 italic_r = 1 and r = 2 π 2 r=2 italic_r = 2 , Theorem 1.6 reproduces Theorem 1.5 .
When r = 3 π 3 r=3 italic_r = 3 , Theorem 1.6 tells us that
E 2 β’ k β 3 , k ( 2 β’ k β 3 ) !! subscript πΈ 2 π 3 π
double-factorial 2 π 3 \displaystyle\frac{E_{2k-3,k}}{(2k-3)!!} divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_k - 3 , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_k - 3 ) !! end_ARG
= \displaystyle= =
1 2 β’ ( 2 β’ k β 1 ) k β 2 β ( 2 β’ k β 2 ) k β 2 + 1 2 β’ ( 2 β’ k β 3 ) k β 2 1 2 superscript 2 π 1 π 2 superscript 2 π 2 π 2 1 2 superscript 2 π 3 π 2 \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}(2k-1)^{k-2}-(2k-2)^{k-2}+\frac{1}{2}(2k-3)^{k-2} divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( 2 italic_k - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( 2 italic_k - 2 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( 2 italic_k - 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
+ 2 3 β’ ( k β 2 ) β’ ( ( 2 β’ k β 3 ) k β 3 β ( 2 β’ k β 2 ) k β 3 ) 2 3 π 2 superscript 2 π 3 π 3 superscript 2 π 2 π 3 \displaystyle+\frac{2}{3}(k-2)\left((2k-3)^{k-3}-(2k-2)^{k-3}\right) + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( italic_k - 2 ) ( ( 2 italic_k - 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( 2 italic_k - 2 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
+ 1 9 β’ ( 4 β’ k β 7 ) β’ ( k β 2 ) β’ ( k β 3 ) β’ ( 2 β’ k β 3 ) k β 5 . 1 9 4 π 7 π 2 π 3 superscript 2 π 3 π 5 \displaystyle+\frac{1}{9}(4k-7)(k-2)(k-3)(2k-3)^{k-5}. + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 9 end_ARG ( 4 italic_k - 7 ) ( italic_k - 2 ) ( italic_k - 3 ) ( 2 italic_k - 3 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k - 5 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .
We prove Theorem 1.6 using the generating functions. Ferroni and Larson provide an expression for the generating function C β’ ( x , y ) πΆ π₯ π¦ C(x,y) italic_C ( italic_x , italic_y ) in terms of the compositional inverse of the function
1 y β’ log β‘ ( 1 + x β’ y ) + log β‘ ( 1 + x ) β x , 1 π¦ 1 π₯ π¦ 1 π₯ π₯ \frac{1}{y}\log(1+xy)+\log(1+x)-x, divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_y end_ARG roman_log ( 1 + italic_x italic_y ) + roman_log ( 1 + italic_x ) - italic_x ,
where y π¦ y italic_y is regarded as a parameter (Section 4 ). We explicitly compute the coefficients of this compositional inverse, which gives
us a formula for the numbers C n , k subscript πΆ π π
C_{n,k} italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Corollary 4.4 ).
We then combine this with the third identity in Proposition 1.4 to prove Theorem 1.6 .
Acknowledgments:
The authors are grateful to Luis Ferroni and Matt Larson, whose work made this paper possible.
4 Inverting a power series
The partial Bell polynomials B n , k β’ ( t 1 , β¦ , t n β k + 1 ) subscript π΅ π π
subscript π‘ 1 β¦ subscript π‘ π π 1 B_{n,k}(t_{1},\ldots,t_{n-k+1}) italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , β¦ , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) are characterized by the identity
exp β‘ ( y β’ β j = 1 β t j β’ x j j ! ) = β 0 β€ k β€ n B n , k β’ ( t 1 , β¦ , t n β k + 1 ) β’ y k β’ x n n ! . π¦ superscript subscript π 1 subscript π‘ π superscript π₯ π π subscript 0 π π subscript π΅ π π
subscript π‘ 1 β¦ subscript π‘ π π 1 superscript π¦ π superscript π₯ π π \exp\left(y\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}t_{j}\frac{x^{j}}{j!}\right)=\sum_{0\leq k\leq n%
}B_{n,k}(t_{1},\ldots,t_{n-k+1})\,y^{k}\frac{x^{n}}{n!}. roman_exp ( italic_y β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_j ! end_ARG ) = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 β€ italic_k β€ italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , β¦ , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG .
(2)
The following lemma gives an explicit expression for these polynomials.
Lemma 4.1 .
We have
B n , k β’ ( t 1 , β¦ , t n β k + 1 ) = n ! k ! β’ β j 1 + β― + j k = n j 1 β₯ 1 , β¦ , j k β₯ 1 t j 1 j 1 ! β’ β― β’ t j k j k ! . subscript π΅ π π
subscript π‘ 1 β¦ subscript π‘ π π 1 π π subscript subscript π 1 β― subscript π π π formulae-sequence subscript π 1 1 β¦
subscript π π 1
subscript π‘ subscript π 1 subscript π 1 β― subscript π‘ subscript π π subscript π π B_{n,k}(t_{1},\ldots,t_{n-k+1})=\frac{n!}{k!}\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}j_{1}+%
\cdots+j_{k}=n\\
j_{1}\geq 1,\ldots,j_{k}\geq 1\end{subarray}}\frac{t_{j_{1}}}{j_{1}!}\cdots%
\frac{t_{j_{k}}}{j_{k}!}. italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , β¦ , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = divide start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG start_ARG italic_k ! end_ARG β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + β― + italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_n end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β₯ 1 , β¦ , italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β₯ 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ! end_ARG β― divide start_ARG italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ! end_ARG .
Proof.
Equation (2 ) implies that B n , k β’ ( t 1 , β¦ , t n β k + 1 ) subscript π΅ π π
subscript π‘ 1 β¦ subscript π‘ π π 1 B_{n,k}(t_{1},\ldots,t_{n-k+1}) italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , β¦ , italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - italic_k + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) is equal to the coefficient of x n superscript π₯ π x^{n} italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the power series
n ! k ! β’ ( β j = 1 β t j β’ x j j ! ) k . π π superscript superscript subscript π 1 subscript π‘ π superscript π₯ π π π \frac{n!}{k!}\left(\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}t_{j}\frac{x^{j}}{j!}\right)^{k}. divide start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG start_ARG italic_k ! end_ARG ( β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_j ! end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT .
The lemma follows.
β
Suppose that
F β’ ( x ) = β n = 1 β F n β’ x n n ! and G β’ ( x ) = β n = 1 β G n β’ x n n ! formulae-sequence πΉ π₯ superscript subscript π 1 subscript πΉ π superscript π₯ π π and
πΊ π₯ superscript subscript π 1 subscript πΊ π superscript π₯ π π F(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}F_{n}\frac{x^{n}}{n!}\qquad\text{and}\qquad G(x)=\sum_%
{n=1}^{\infty}G_{n}\frac{x^{n}}{n!} italic_F ( italic_x ) = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG and italic_G ( italic_x ) = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG
are power series with coefficients in some commutative β β \mathbb{Q} blackboard_Q -algebra R π
R italic_R .
Suppose further that F 1 β 0 subscript πΉ 1 0 F_{1}\neq 0 italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β 0 , and let F n ^ = F n + 1 ( n + 1 ) β’ F 1 ^ subscript πΉ π subscript πΉ π 1 π 1 subscript πΉ 1 \hat{F_{n}}=\frac{F_{n+1}}{(n+1)F_{1}} over^ start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_n + 1 ) italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ,
so that
F ^ β’ ( x ) := β n = 1 β F n ^ β’ x n n ! = F β’ ( x ) β F 1 β’ x x . assign ^ πΉ π₯ superscript subscript π 1 ^ subscript πΉ π superscript π₯ π π πΉ π₯ subscript πΉ 1 π₯ π₯ \hat{F}(x):=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\hat{F_{n}}\frac{x^{n}}{n!}=\frac{F(x)-F_{1}x}{%
x}. over^ start_ARG italic_F end_ARG ( italic_x ) := β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG = divide start_ARG italic_F ( italic_x ) - italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_ARG start_ARG italic_x end_ARG .
The following result is a corollary of the Lagrange inversion theorem [Cha02 , Corollary 11.3] .
Theorem 4.2 .
We have G β’ ( F β’ ( x ) ) = x πΊ πΉ π₯ π₯ G(F(x))=x italic_G ( italic_F ( italic_x ) ) = italic_x if and only if G 1 = F 1 β 1 subscript πΊ 1 superscript subscript πΉ 1 1 G_{1}=F_{1}^{-1} italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and, for all n > 1 π 1 n>1 italic_n > 1 ,
G n subscript πΊ π \displaystyle G_{n} italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
= \displaystyle= =
1 F 1 n β’ β k = 1 n β 1 n β’ ( n + 1 ) β’ β― β’ ( n + k β 1 ) β’ B n β 1 , k β’ ( F ^ 1 , β¦ , F ^ n β k ) 1 superscript subscript πΉ 1 π superscript subscript π 1 π 1 π π 1 β― π π 1 subscript π΅ π 1 π
subscript ^ πΉ 1 β¦ subscript ^ πΉ π π \displaystyle\frac{1}{F_{1}^{n}}\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}n(n+1)\cdots(n+k-1)B_{n-1,k}%
\left(\hat{F}_{1},\ldots,\hat{F}_{n-k}\right) divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n ( italic_n + 1 ) β― ( italic_n + italic_k - 1 ) italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over^ start_ARG italic_F end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , β¦ , over^ start_ARG italic_F end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
= \displaystyle= =
1 F 1 n β’ β k = 1 n β 1 ( β 1 ) k β’ ( n + k β 1 ) ! k ! β’ β j 1 + β― + j k = n β 1 j 1 β₯ 1 , β¦ , j k β₯ 1 β i = 1 k F ^ j i j i ! . 1 superscript subscript πΉ 1 π superscript subscript π 1 π 1 superscript 1 π π π 1 π subscript subscript π 1 β― subscript π π π 1 formulae-sequence subscript π 1 1 β¦
subscript π π 1
superscript subscript product π 1 π subscript ^ πΉ subscript π π subscript π π \displaystyle\frac{1}{F_{1}^{n}}\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(-1)^{k}\frac{(n+k-1)!}{k!}%
\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}j_{1}+\cdots+j_{k}=n-1\\
j_{1}\geq 1,\ldots,j_{k}\geq 1\end{subarray}}\prod_{i=1}^{k}\frac{\hat{F}_{j_{%
i}}}{j_{i}!}. divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ( italic_n + italic_k - 1 ) ! end_ARG start_ARG italic_k ! end_ARG β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + β― + italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_n - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β₯ 1 , β¦ , italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β₯ 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_F end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ! end_ARG .
We now apply Theorem 4.2 to a particular power series with coefficients in the commutative β β \mathbb{Q} blackboard_Q -algebra β β’ [ y ] β delimited-[] π¦ \mathbb{Q}[y] blackboard_Q [ italic_y ] .
Let
F β’ ( x , y ) = β n = 1 β F n β’ ( y ) β’ x n n ! := 1 y β’ log β‘ ( 1 + x β’ y ) + log β‘ ( 1 + x ) β x . πΉ π₯ π¦ superscript subscript π 1 subscript πΉ π π¦ superscript π₯ π π assign 1 π¦ 1 π₯ π¦ 1 π₯ π₯ F(x,y)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}F_{n}(y)\frac{x^{n}}{n!}:=\frac{1}{y}\log(1+xy)+\log%
(1+x)-x. italic_F ( italic_x , italic_y ) = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG := divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_y end_ARG roman_log ( 1 + italic_x italic_y ) + roman_log ( 1 + italic_x ) - italic_x .
Explicitly, we have F 1 β’ ( y ) = 1 subscript πΉ 1 π¦ 1 F_{1}(y)=1 italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) = 1 and F n β’ ( y ) = ( β 1 ) n β 1 β’ ( n β 1 ) ! β’ ( 1 + y n β 1 ) subscript πΉ π π¦ superscript 1 π 1 π 1 1 superscript π¦ π 1 F_{n}(y)=(-1)^{n-1}(n-1)!(1+y^{n-1}) italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) = ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_n - 1 ) ! ( 1 + italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) for all n > 1 π 1 n>1 italic_n > 1 .
Let
G β’ ( x , y ) = β n = 1 β G n β’ ( y ) β’ x n n ! = β n = 1 β β k = 0 β G n , k β’ y k β’ x n n ! πΊ π₯ π¦ superscript subscript π 1 subscript πΊ π π¦ superscript π₯ π π superscript subscript π 1 superscript subscript π 0 subscript πΊ π π
superscript π¦ π superscript π₯ π π G(x,y)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}G_{n}(y)\frac{x^{n}}{n!}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=%
0}^{\infty}G_{n,k}\,y^{k}\frac{x^{n}}{n!} italic_G ( italic_x , italic_y ) = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_n ! end_ARG
be the unique power series with the property that G β’ ( F β’ ( x , y ) , x ) = x πΊ πΉ π₯ π¦ π₯ π₯ G(F(x,y),x)=x italic_G ( italic_F ( italic_x , italic_y ) , italic_x ) = italic_x .
Proposition 4.3 .
We have
G n , β = G n , n β β β 1 = β j = 0 β ( β 1 ) j + β β’ [ [ j + β j ] ] β’ { n + j j + β + 1 } . subscript πΊ π β
subscript πΊ π π β 1
superscript subscript π 0 β superscript 1 π β delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix π β π FRACOP π π π β 1 G_{n,\ell}=G_{n,n-\ell-1}=\sum_{j=0}^{\ell}(-1)^{j+\ell}{\left[\!\left[\begin{%
matrix}j+\ell\\
j\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}\genfrac{\{}{\}}{0.0pt}{}{n+j}{j+\ell+1}. italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_n - roman_β - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j + roman_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_j + roman_β end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] { FRACOP start_ARG italic_n + italic_j end_ARG start_ARG italic_j + roman_β + 1 end_ARG } .
Proof.
Let
F ^ n β’ ( y ) := F n + 1 β’ ( y ) ( n + 1 ) β’ F 1 β’ ( y ) = ( β 1 ) n β’ n ! β’ ( 1 + y n ) n + 1 . assign subscript ^ πΉ π π¦ subscript πΉ π 1 π¦ π 1 subscript πΉ 1 π¦ superscript 1 π π 1 superscript π¦ π π 1 \hat{F}_{n}(y):=\frac{F_{n+1}(y)}{(n+1)F_{1}(y)}=\frac{(-1)^{n}n!(1+y^{n})}{n+%
1}. over^ start_ARG italic_F end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) := divide start_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n + 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_n + 1 ) italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) end_ARG = divide start_ARG ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n ! ( 1 + italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_n + 1 end_ARG .
By Theorem 4.2 , we have
G n β’ ( y ) subscript πΊ π π¦ \displaystyle G_{n}(y) italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y )
= \displaystyle= =
β k = 1 n β 1 ( β 1 ) k β’ ( n + k β 1 ) ! k ! β’ β j 1 + β― + j k = n β 1 j 1 β₯ 1 , β¦ , j k β₯ 1 β i = 1 k F ^ j i β’ ( y ) j i ! superscript subscript π 1 π 1 superscript 1 π π π 1 π subscript subscript π 1 β― subscript π π π 1 formulae-sequence subscript π 1 1 β¦
subscript π π 1
superscript subscript product π 1 π subscript ^ πΉ subscript π π π¦ subscript π π \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(-1)^{k}\frac{(n+k-1)!}{k!}\sum_{\begin{subarray}%
{c}j_{1}+\cdots+j_{k}=n-1\\
j_{1}\geq 1,\ldots,j_{k}\geq 1\end{subarray}}\prod_{i=1}^{k}\frac{\hat{F}_{j_{%
i}}(y)}{j_{i}!} β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ( italic_n + italic_k - 1 ) ! end_ARG start_ARG italic_k ! end_ARG β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + β― + italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_n - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β₯ 1 , β¦ , italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β₯ 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_F end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ! end_ARG
= \displaystyle= =
β k = 1 n β 1 ( β 1 ) n + k β 1 β’ ( n + k β 1 ) ! k ! β’ β j 1 + β― + j k = n β 1 j 1 β₯ 1 , β¦ , j k β₯ 1 β i = 1 k 1 + y j i j i + 1 . superscript subscript π 1 π 1 superscript 1 π π 1 π π 1 π subscript subscript π 1 β― subscript π π π 1 formulae-sequence subscript π 1 1 β¦
subscript π π 1
superscript subscript product π 1 π 1 superscript π¦ subscript π π subscript π π 1 \displaystyle\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(-1)^{n+k-1}\frac{(n+k-1)!}{k!}\sum_{\begin{%
subarray}{c}j_{1}+\cdots+j_{k}=n-1\\
j_{1}\geq 1,\ldots,j_{k}\geq 1\end{subarray}}\prod_{i=1}^{k}\frac{1+y^{j_{i}}}%
{j_{i}+1}. β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n + italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG ( italic_n + italic_k - 1 ) ! end_ARG start_ARG italic_k ! end_ARG β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + β― + italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_n - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β₯ 1 , β¦ , italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β₯ 1 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 + italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_j start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + 1 end_ARG .
Note that this polynomial is clearly palindromic of degree n β 1 π 1 n-1 italic_n - 1 , which implies that G n , β = G n , n β β β 1 subscript πΊ π β
subscript πΊ π π β 1
G_{n,\ell}=G_{n,n-\ell-1} italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_n - roman_β - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
By Corollary 3.4 , G n β’ ( y ) subscript πΊ π π¦ G_{n}(y) italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) is equal to
β β = 0 n β 1 y β β’ β k = 1 n β 1 ( β 1 ) n + k β 1 β’ β p = 0 β [ [ β + p p ] ] β’ [ [ n β 1 β β + k β p k β p ] ] β’ ( n + k β 1 β + p ) . superscript subscript β 0 π 1 superscript π¦ β superscript subscript π 1 π 1 superscript 1 π π 1 superscript subscript π 0 β delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix β π π delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix π 1 β π π π π binomial π π 1 β π \sum_{\ell=0}^{n-1}y^{\ell}\ \sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(-1)^{n+k-1}\sum_{p=0}^{\ell}{%
\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}\ell+p\\
p\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}{\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}n-1-\ell+k-p\\
k-p\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}\binom{n+k-1}{\ell+p}. β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_β = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n + italic_k - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL roman_β + italic_p end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_p end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n - 1 - roman_β + italic_k - italic_p end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_k - italic_p end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] ( FRACOP start_ARG italic_n + italic_k - 1 end_ARG start_ARG roman_β + italic_p end_ARG ) .
Taking the coefficient of y β superscript π¦ β y^{\ell} italic_y start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and reindexing with j = k β p π π π j=k-p italic_j = italic_k - italic_p , we get
G n , β = β j = 0 n β β β 1 ( β 1 ) n + j β β β 1 β’ [ [ n β 1 β β + j j ] ] β’ β p = 0 β ( β 1 ) β + p β’ [ [ β + p p ] ] β’ ( n β 1 + j + p β + p ) . subscript πΊ π β
superscript subscript π 0 π β 1 superscript 1 π π β 1 delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix π 1 β π π superscript subscript π 0 β superscript 1 β π delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix β π π binomial π 1 π π β π G_{n,\ell}=\sum_{j=0}^{n-\ell-1}(-1)^{n+j-\ell-1}{\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}%
n-1-\ell+j\\
j\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}\sum_{p=0}^{\ell}(-1)^{\ell+p}{\left[\!\left[%
\begin{matrix}\ell+p\\
p\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}\binom{n-1+j+p}{\ell+p}. italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - roman_β - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n + italic_j - roman_β - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n - 1 - roman_β + italic_j end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_β + italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL roman_β + italic_p end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_p end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] ( FRACOP start_ARG italic_n - 1 + italic_j + italic_p end_ARG start_ARG roman_β + italic_p end_ARG ) .
Note that the symmetry
G n , β = G n , n β 1 β β subscript πΊ π β
subscript πΊ π π 1 β
G_{n,\ell}=G_{n,n-1-\ell} italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_n - 1 - roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can be seen by exchanging j π j italic_j and p π p italic_p in the summation above.
By Lemma 2.1 with m = n β 1 + j π π 1 π m=n-1+j italic_m = italic_n - 1 + italic_j , we have
G n , β = β j = 0 n β β β 1 ( β 1 ) n + j β β β 1 β’ [ [ n β 1 β β + j j ] ] β’ { n + j n + j β β } . subscript πΊ π β
superscript subscript π 0 π β 1 superscript 1 π π β 1 delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix π 1 β π π FRACOP π π π π β G_{n,\ell}=\sum_{j=0}^{n-\ell-1}(-1)^{n+j-\ell-1}{\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}%
n-1-\ell+j\\
j\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}\genfrac{\{}{\}}{0.0pt}{}{n+j}{n+j-\ell}. italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n - roman_β - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n + italic_j - roman_β - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_n - 1 - roman_β + italic_j end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] { FRACOP start_ARG italic_n + italic_j end_ARG start_ARG italic_n + italic_j - roman_β end_ARG } .
Replacing β β \ell roman_β with n β 1 β β π 1 β n-1-\ell italic_n - 1 - roman_β allows us to rewrite our expression as
G n , β = G n , n β 1 β β = β j = 0 β ( β 1 ) j + β β’ [ [ j + β j ] ] β’ { n + j j + β + 1 } . subscript πΊ π β
subscript πΊ π π 1 β
superscript subscript π 0 β superscript 1 π β delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix π β π FRACOP π π π β 1 G_{n,\ell}=G_{n,n-1-\ell}=\sum_{j=0}^{\ell}(-1)^{j+\ell}{\left[\!\left[\begin{%
matrix}j+\ell\\
j\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}\genfrac{\{}{\}}{0.0pt}{}{n+j}{j+\ell+1}. italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_n - 1 - roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j + roman_β end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_j + roman_β end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_j end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] { FRACOP start_ARG italic_n + italic_j end_ARG start_ARG italic_j + roman_β + 1 end_ARG } .
This completes the proof.
β
Proposition 4.3 , along with a theorem of Ferroni and Larson, provides a formula for C n , β subscript πΆ π β
C_{n,\ell} italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT .
Corollary 4.4 .
For all n β₯ 2 π 2 n\geq 2 italic_n β₯ 2 , we have
C n , β = β k = 0 β β 1 ( β 1 ) k + β β 1 β’ [ [ k + β β 1 k ] ] β’ { n β 1 + k k + β } . subscript πΆ π β
superscript subscript π 0 β 1 superscript 1 π β 1 delimited-[] delimited-[] matrix π β 1 π FRACOP π 1 π π β C_{n,\ell}=\sum_{k=0}^{\ell-1}(-1)^{k+\ell-1}{\left[\!\left[\begin{matrix}k+%
\ell-1\\
k\end{matrix}\right]\!\right]}\genfrac{\{}{\}}{0.0pt}{}{n-1+k}{k+\ell}. italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_β - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - 1 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k + roman_β - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ [ start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL italic_k + roman_β - 1 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_k end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG ] ] { FRACOP start_ARG italic_n - 1 + italic_k end_ARG start_ARG italic_k + roman_β end_ARG } .
Proof.
Using the work of Drake [Dra08 , Example 1.5.1] ,
Ferroni and Larson [FL24 , Proposition 2.3] show that
C β’ ( x , y ) = ( 1 + y ) β’ x + y β’ β« G β’ ( x , y ) β’ π x , πΆ π₯ π¦ 1 π¦ π₯ π¦ πΊ π₯ π¦ differential-d π₯ C(x,y)=(1+y)x+y\int G(x,y)\,dx, italic_C ( italic_x , italic_y ) = ( 1 + italic_y ) italic_x + italic_y β« italic_G ( italic_x , italic_y ) italic_d italic_x ,
where the improper integral is taken to have no constant term. This means that,
for all n β₯ 2 π 2 n\geq 2 italic_n β₯ 2 ,
C n , β = G n β 1 , β β 1 subscript πΆ π β
subscript πΊ π 1 β 1
C_{n,\ell}=G_{n-1,\ell-1} italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , roman_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n - 1 , roman_β - 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . The Corollary then follows from Proposition 4.3 .
β