1 Introduction
Let be a bounded domain with
Lipschitz boundary . Define and . We study the following nonlinear
parabolic evolution problem of forward-backward type:
|
|
|
(4) |
The initial data function is given in with a trace of zero on .
Here is a nonlinear, continuous, potential gradient function, satisfying that , where and . Moreover, and satisfy the following structure conditions:
|
|
|
(5) |
and
|
|
|
(6) |
for some , where .
We would like to point out that no monotonicity requirements such as for are imposed.
Before stating our main results, let us mention some related results. Slemrod 1991Dynamics investigated the asymptotic behavior of measure valued solutions to the initial value problem for the nonlinear heat conduction equation
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
Demoulini 1996Young further discussed the Young measure solutions for the case that
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
With the similar framework as in 1996Young , Yin and Wang 2003Young extended the theory of Young measure solutions to the more general case like that
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
where . Especially, for the limit case that , by assuming that there exists a sequence such that locally and uniformly converges to in , and adding some conditions for , they obtained the existence of a kind of biting Young measure solutions. However, the uniqueness is lost due to the failure of the equality of independence (16) below.
When is convex and , there have been a lot of research activities in mathematical theory and engineering, see MR571133 ; MR1301176 ; 2001Minimizing ; MR3341130 . One possible approach to consider solutions is to use parabolic variational inequality. Lichnewsky and Temam 1978Pseudo considered the pseudo-solutions of the time-dependent minimal surface equation
|
|
|
More similar results can be found in MR1148668 ; MR2001660 .
Other possible approaches to define the generalized solutions is to apply the Anzellotti pairing Gabriele1983Pairings . Andreu et al. 2004Parabolic investigated the following nonlinear problem
|
|
|
where and is a convex function with linear growth. By virtue of the Anzellotti pairing and nonlinear semigroup theory, they obtained the result of the existence and uniqueness of generalized solutions.
The aim of this paper is to study the existence and uniqueness of solutions for problem . The novelties of this paper are as follows. First, inspired by the known theory 2010Characterization ; MR2885572 , we introduce a new framework of generalized Young measure solutions which can ensure the uniqueness of solutions. Second, our proof relies on some viscosity approximation instead of the usual –Laplace type approximation as . Third, based on the new definition of generalized Young measure solutions, we remark that we can not only deal with the nonlinear parabolic problem with linear growth, but also show the equivalence between the generalized Young measure solutions and the strong solutions (in Definition 6).
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we first present the mathematical preliminaries, some definitions and auxiliary lemmas. In Section 3, we prove the existence of the generalized Young measure solutions. In Section 4, we establish the uniqueness of the generalized Young measure solutions. Finally in Section 5, the equivalence between generalized Young measure solutions and strong solutions is investigated.
3 Existence Results
In this section, we are ready to prove the existence of generalized Young measure solutions of .
We first introduce the following assumptions (SH):
, and .
and satisfy the structure conditions:
|
|
|
(39) |
and
|
|
|
(40) |
for some .
and .
, ,
|
|
|
Theorem 1.
Under the assumptions of (SH). Given with a trace of zero on , there exists a generalized Young measure solution of for every .
Proof: According to Lemma 3, for almost all , we can extract from and , a subsequence (still labeled by and ) such that
|
|
|
|
|
(41) |
|
|
|
|
|
(42) |
|
|
|
|
|
(43) |
|
|
|
|
|
(44) |
|
|
|
|
|
(45) |
and
|
|
|
|
|
(46) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47) |
|
|
|
|
|
(48) |
where and .
We divide the proof into the following steps.
Step 1. For all ,
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Letting , we have
|
|
|
i.e.,
|
|
|
Since , then
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(49) |
we obtain
|
|
|
(50) |
Therefore,
|
|
|
(51) |
and by boundary trace theorem (see (MR1857292, , Theorem 3.87)),
|
|
|
(52) |
Step 2. Prove
|
|
|
Set
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
By the definition of and , we arrive at
|
|
|
Thus, we get , for all .
Similarly, it follows that , for all .
Now, assume .
Since , there exists and such that
|
|
|
(53) |
According to Lemma 2, there exist , , such that
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
(54) |
Observe that
|
|
|
one has
|
|
|
Hence, by (53) and (54), it follows that
|
|
|
Then, we obtain
|
|
|
we deduce that it is a contradiction by letting .
Thus,
|
|
|
Moreover, recall that
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Finally, we get
|
|
|
Step 3.
Since
|
|
|
with , we get
|
|
|
For any , one has
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55) |
Observe that by (12) and (16),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56) |
From (41),(43),(45) and (46), we get
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57) |
On the other hand, by Green’s formula of Lemma 8, it follows that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58) |
Hence, by (55),(56),(57) and (58), letting , we have
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, by the arbitrariness of and the definition of ,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59) |
holds in .
4 Uniqueness Results
The (JF) inequality (38) describes a property of the solution upon which the uniqueness proof relies. Similar to the situation of Young measure solutions, we note that there is no claim that the parametrized measure is unique, which is false in general.
Theorem 2.
Under the assumptions of (SH). If both and are the generalized Young measure solutions of , then
|
|
|
for every .
Proof: Note , .
Since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observe that by (37),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence, it follows that .
On the other hand, by and (37),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, . Similarly, we get .
Now, by
|
|
|
we have
|
|
|
and this leads to the uniqueness.
5 Equivalence between Generalized Young Measure Solutions and Strong Solutions
It doesn’t make much sense just to propose a concept of generalized solution with existence and uniqueness. Next, we will establish the relationship between this generalized solution and other types of generalized solutions.
When the parabolic variational integral is convex, Andreu et al.2004Parabolic combined nonlinear semigroup theory with Anzellotti’s dual theoryGabriele1983Pairings to give a definition of semigroup strong solutions to this equation, and systematically studied the existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of this kind of solutions.
In this section, we study the relationship between generalized Young measure solutions and strong solutions ((2004Parabolic, , Definition 6.5)).
The additional assumptions (H) are the following:
is continuous on and convex in , where
|
|
|
and holds, .
Definition 6.
A measurable function is a strong solution of in if , , , , a.e. , and for almost all satisfies:
|
|
|
(60) |
|
|
|
(61) |
|
|
|
(62) |
Using the theory of nonlinear semigroups, Andreu et al. proved the existence and uniqueness of strong solutions (2004Parabolic, , Theorem 6.6) and the following lemma follows.
Lemma 11.
Under the assumptions of and . Given , there exists a unique strong solution of in for every such that .
Assume that satisfies and is a solution in the Definition 6, by calculation, we can verify that is a generalized gradient Young solution. The following theorem follows.
Theorem 3.
If is a strong solution of in the Definition 6, then is a generalized gradient Young measure solution of .
On the other hand, if is convex and satisfies (SH), the generalized Young solution of uniquely determines a strong solution in Definition 6.
Theorem 4.
Let . If is a generalized Young measure solution of , then is a strong solution of in Definition 6.
Proof:
Since is convex function, by the usual theory of monotone operators, there exists a unique weak solution (of usual sense) to problem ,
then is a Young measure solution to the problem .
Using , by the method in Theorem 1, there exist a subsequence and a generalized gradient Young measure solution () satisfying that
|
|
|
Since
|
|
|
(63) |
we get .
Let and . By the convexity of and ,
it follows that
|
|
|
(64) |
Since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we have
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From this, and
|
|
|
letting in (64), we obtain
|
|
|
Hence,
|
|
|
then, its absolutely continuous part satisfies that
|
|
|
Since is separable, by taking a countable set dense in , we have that the above inequality holds for all , where is such that , and all .
Now, fixed and given , there is such that .
Thus,
|
|
|
By choosing , , and letting , we obtain
|
|
|
(65) |
Similar to (50) and (59), we have
|
|
|
(66) |
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67) |
in .
Thus,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68) |
and its singular parts satisfies that
|
|
|
Then, it follows that
|
|
|
(69) |
By (66), we get
|
|
|
(70) |
Since is a generalized gradient Young measure, by of Lemma 10, it follows that
|
|
|
i.e.,
|
|
|
(71) |
On the other hand, by (70), we have
|
|
|
where .
Then, by , we find
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
holds .
Combining this inequality with (69) and (71), we obtain
|
|
|
Therefore,
|
|
|
(72) |
and
|
|
|
(73) |
Since , we get
|
|
|
(74) |
According to Theorem 2, .
Combining (63),(65) and (72)–(74), we arrive at (60)–(62). The proof is complete.
\bmhead
Data Availability
The authors declare that data sharing not applicable to this article, as no datasets were generated or analysed during the study.