Uncommon magnetic ordering in the quantum magnet Yb3Ga5O12

S. Raymond111corresponding author : [email protected] Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, IRIG, MEM, MDN, 38000 Grenoble, France    E. Lhotel Institut Néel, CNRS & Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France    E. Riordan Institut Néel, CNRS & Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France    E. Ressouche Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, IRIG, MEM, MDN, 38000 Grenoble, France    K. Beauvois Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, IRIG, MEM, MDN, 38000 Grenoble, France    C. Marin Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CEA, IRIG, PHELIQS, 38000 Grenoble, France    M.E. Zhitomirsky Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CEA, IRIG, PHELIQS, 38000 Grenoble, France
(June 2, 2024)
Abstract

The antiferromagnetic structure of Yb3Ga5O12 is identified by neutron diffraction experiments below the previously-known transition at Tλ=54subscript𝑇𝜆54T_{\lambda}=54italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 54 mK. The magnetic propagation vector is found to be 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐤12120{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ), an unusual wave-vector in the garnet structure. The associated complex magnetic structure highlights the role of exchange interactions in a nearly isotropic system dominated by dipolar interactions and finds echos with exotic structures theoretically proposed. Reduced values of the ordered moments may indicate significant quantum fluctuations in this effective spin-1/2 geometrically frustrated magnet.

Research on geometrically frustrated magnetic materials has been extremely fruitful for discovering new states of condensed matter, namely exotic spin liquid, spin ice and spin fragmented states Balents ; Jaubert ; Lhotel1 . The hallmark geometries associated to these findings are the three dimensional pyrochlore and two dimensional kagome lattices. Recently interest has been reborn in the less studied hyperkagome lattice and in particular in the family of rare-earth gallium garnet systems R3subscript𝑅3R_{3}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTGa5O12. In these cubic crystals (space group Ia3¯¯3\bar{3}over¯ start_ARG 3 end_ARGd), the rare-earth ions R3+superscript𝑅limit-from3R^{3+}italic_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, form two three dimensional interpenetrating lattices of corner sharing triangles called hyperkagome lattices. Depending on the rare earth element, anisotropy leads to contrasted behaviors from the realization of multi-axis antiferromagnetic order in Ising systems (R=𝑅absentR=italic_R =Nd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er) Hamman1 ; Hamman2 ; Hamman3 ; Cai ; Wav ; Petit ; Kibalin ; Hamman4 to exotic spin correlations in nearly isotropic systems R=𝑅absentR=italic_R =Gd Paddison and R=𝑅absentR=italic_R =Yb Sandberg ; Lhotel2 .

In the present work, we focus on the magnetic state of of the effective spin-1/2 hyperkagome material Yb3Ga5O12. It has been known for a long time that the heat capacity exhibits a lambda-type anomaly at Tλsubscript𝑇𝜆T_{\lambda}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT \approx 54 mK and a broad hump at about 200 mK Filippi . While the latter feature is associated with magnetic correlations recently studied by neutron scattering Sandberg ; Lhotel2 , microscopic insight into the nature of the transition and the magnetic ground state has been missing for more than forty years. In particular, the Mössbauer spectroscopy measurements did not observe any hyperfine splitting associated with a possible magnetic ordering below Tλsubscript𝑇𝜆T_{\lambda}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Hodges . The μ𝜇\muitalic_μSR experiments also did not detect any sign of long-range order as well pointing instead to the reinforcement of the dynamical correlations below Tλsubscript𝑇𝜆T_{\lambda}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Dalmas03 . In this letter, we show through neutron diffraction experiments that a static long-range magnetic order does settle below Tλsubscript𝑇𝜆T_{\lambda}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Our measurements reveal that it arises with a propagation vector 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐤12120{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ) that has never been reported, to our knowledge, at zero field for the garnet systems, where the magnetic ordering occurs in almost all cases within the crystallographic unit cell, i.e. with a propagation vector k=0k0\textbf{k}=0k = 0 (ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ point of the Brillouin zone) garnet and a few cases with k= (0, 0, 1) (H𝐻Hitalic_H point of the Brillouin zone) Plumier .

Diffraction measurements were performed at the Institut Laue Langevin, Grenoble on the two-axis thermal-neutron diffractometer D23 equipped with a lifting detector. A copper monochromator provides an unpolarized beam with the wavelength of 1.276 Å. The sample is the same as the one used for magnetization measurements in Ref. Lhotel2, . In order to insure a good thermalization, the sample was inserted inside a sealed copper box filled with helium and the box was attached to the mixing chamber of a dilution stick. The based temperature was 30 mK on the thermometer mounted below the mixing chamber.

Based on common experimental observations for materials from the R3subscript𝑅3R_{3}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTGa5O12 family as well as by theoretical predictions Capel ; Kibalin , an extensive search was performed for the magnetic ordering wave-vector 𝐤=𝟎𝐤0{\bf k}={\bf 0}bold_k = bold_0 complemented by a few checks at 𝐤=(0,0,1)𝐤001{\bf k}=(0,0,1)bold_k = ( 0 , 0 , 1 ). No signal was found by subtraction of the peak intensity collected at 35 mK and 500 mK over 21 representative reflections (10 independent ones). In contrast by expanding the search along a ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ-ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ line, a magnetic signal has been detected. Figures 1a and b show scans along the momentum transfer 𝐐=(QH,QH,0)𝐐subscript𝑄𝐻subscript𝑄𝐻0{\bf Q}=(Q_{H},Q_{H},0)bold_Q = ( italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 ) and (1/2,1/2,QL)1212subscript𝑄𝐿(1/2,1/2,Q_{L})( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) respectively at 35 mK and 500 mK, where the coordinates of the momentum transfer 𝐐𝐐\bf{Q}bold_Q are given in units of 2π/a2𝜋𝑎2\pi/a2 italic_π / italic_a with the lattice parameter a𝑎aitalic_a = 12.196 Å (r.l.u. stands for reciprocal lattice units in the Figure 1). They reveal a peak at QH=1/2subscript𝑄𝐻12Q_{H}=1/2italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / 2 and QL=0subscript𝑄𝐿0Q_{L}=0italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 respectively, so that the propagation vector is 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐤12120{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ) (It is recalled the relation between momentum transfer and propagation vector: 𝐐=𝐆±𝐤𝐐plus-or-minus𝐆𝐤{\bf Q}={\bf G}\pm{\bf k}bold_Q = bold_G ± bold_k where 𝐆𝐆\bf{G}bold_G lies at a ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ point of the reciprocal lattice). Figure 1c shows the intensity difference obtained between the data collected at 35 and 500 mK along 𝐐=(QH,QH,0)𝐐subscript𝑄𝐻subscript𝑄𝐻0{\bf Q}=(Q_{H},Q_{H},0)bold_Q = ( italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 ) over an extended range in QHsubscript𝑄𝐻Q_{H}italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The diffuse scattering intensity measured above Tλsubscript𝑇𝜆T_{\lambda}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT on D7-ILL from Ref. Lhotel2, is also shown as a dashed line. This highlights the fact that the correlations at (1/2,1/2,0)12120(1/2,1/2,0)( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ) evidenced above Tλsubscript𝑇𝜆T_{\lambda}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in our previous study transform into a long range magnetic order below Tλsubscript𝑇𝜆T_{\lambda}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Momentum transfer cuts at 35 mK (full blue circles) and 500 mK (open red circles) along (a) 𝐐=(QH,QH,0)𝐐subscript𝑄𝐻subscript𝑄𝐻0{\bf Q}=(Q_{H},Q_{H},0)bold_Q = ( italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 ) and (b) along 𝐐=(1/2,1/2,QL)𝐐1212subscript𝑄𝐿{\bf Q}=(1/2,1/2,Q_{L})bold_Q = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). (c) Subtraction of the neutron intensity obtained at 35 mK from the one obtained at 500 mK along 𝐐=(QH,QH,0)𝐐subscript𝑄𝐻subscript𝑄𝐻0{\bf Q}=(Q_{H},Q_{H},0)bold_Q = ( italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 ) in an extended range up to QH=2subscript𝑄𝐻2Q_{H}=2italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_H end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2. The red dashed line indicates the diffuse scattering data obtained above Tλsubscript𝑇𝜆T_{\lambda}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Ref. Lhotel2, ; the intensity is scaled to the new data. In all the panels, full lines are guides to the eye.

Figure 2 shows the temperature dependence of the Bragg peak intensity at 𝐐=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐐12120{\bf Q}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_Q = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ) on warming and on cooling. The temperature was varied by 2 mK steps, and after a 4 min waiting time, the intensity was counted during 15 min for each point. The obtained transition temperatures are 62 mK on cooling and 66 mK on warming, which may suggest a first order transition. However, after cooling the initial low temperature intensity is not recovered. In order to check whether it is intrinsic or related to the thermalization of the sample, a point at 50 mK has been measured with a longer stabilization time. The outcome is shown in Figure 2 where the black diamond points indicate the data obtained at 50 mK after 1 hour waiting time on warming from 30 mK or 1 hour waiting time on cooling from 90 mK. The same intensity is recovered (overlap** diamonds) meaning that there is no intrinsic temperature hysteresis in the system. Due to the available neutron beamtime, we could not determine the equilibrium temperature dependence of the magnetic intensity with this stabilization time protocole for each point. From this analysis, we estimate that the real Néel temperature is TNsubscript𝑇𝑁T_{N}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT= 64 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 2 mK, a somewhat higher value than the reported Tλsubscript𝑇𝜆T_{\lambda}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=54 mK in specific heat.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Temperature dependence of the neutron intensity measured at 𝐐=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐐12120{\bf Q}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_Q = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ) on warming from 30 to 90 mK (red dots) and on cooling from 90 to 30 mK (blue circles). The black diamond points correspond to data obtained by longer stabilisation time of 1 h (see text).

In the space group Ia3¯¯3\bar{3}over¯ start_ARG 3 end_ARGd, the star of 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐤12120{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ) contains six equivalent wave-vectors, producing six antiferromagnetic configuration domains. As expected in the absence of symmetry breaking perturbation, the integrated peak intensities measured for the six corresponding Bragg reflections 𝐐=𝐤𝐐𝐤{\bf Q}={\bf k}bold_Q = bold_k are found to be very similar. In order to address the magnetic structure, a collection of magnetic peaks belonging to the single configuration domain with 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐤12120{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ) has been carried out through rocking curve measurements (“Omega scans”). Representatives of such scans are shown in Figure 3a, the strongest peak, which corresponds to 𝐐=𝐤𝐐𝐤{\bf Q}={\bf k}bold_Q = bold_k being shown in the top panel. Due to the weak signal, long counting times were necessary (9 min per point) and 21 independent magnetic Bragg peaks could be collected. Owing to the limited set of data and given the complexity of the lattice (12 magnetic sites without the centring I), the full structure could not be solved. The discrimination between the possible structures was made by least-square fitting of the data, while screening the combinations of basis vectors given by the magnetic representation analysis (Details are given in the Supplemental Material Supplement ).

In the space group Ia3¯¯3\bar{3}over¯ start_ARG 3 end_ARGd with the propagation vector 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐤12120{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ), there exist only two representations of order two, Γ1subscriptΓ1\Gamma_{1}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Γ2subscriptΓ2\Gamma_{2}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and the sites are split into 1a sites (8 moments), 1b sites (2 moments) and 1c sites (2 moments) Supplement . The remaining 12 sites are deduced by the centring symmetry I, where the moments are reversed given the propagation vector 𝐤𝐤\bf{k}bold_k. The best fit is obtained using the Γ2subscriptΓ2\Gamma_{2}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT representation and by putting the 1a site moments along (0, 0, MZsubscript𝑀𝑍M_{Z}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) (the components (MXsubscript𝑀𝑋M_{X}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, MYsubscript𝑀𝑌M_{Y}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, MZsubscript𝑀𝑍M_{Z}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) are given in the global coordinate frame (X𝑋Xitalic_X, Y𝑌Yitalic_Y, Z𝑍Zitalic_Z) associated to the crystallographic a𝑎aitalic_a, b𝑏bitalic_b and c𝑐citalic_c axes). As far as the 1b site is concerned, the fits show that a MZsubscript𝑀𝑍M_{Z}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT component must exist but they are not conclusive about the symmetry allowed (MXsubscript𝑀𝑋M_{X}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, -MXsubscript𝑀𝑋M_{X}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, 0) component. For the 1c site, the data are compatible with any possibility from zero magnetic moment to magnetic moments in the direction (MXsubscript𝑀𝑋M_{X}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, -MXsubscript𝑀𝑋M_{X}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, MZsubscript𝑀𝑍M_{Z}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: a) Representative rocking curves (red points) performed at 35 mK for 𝐐=(0.5,0.5,0)𝐐0.50.50{\bf Q}=(0.5,0.5,0)bold_Q = ( 0.5 , 0.5 , 0 ), 𝐐=(1.5,2.5,1)𝐐1.52.51{\bf Q}=(1.5,2.5,1)bold_Q = ( 1.5 , 2.5 , 1 ) and 𝐐=(0.5,0.5,2)𝐐0.50.52{\bf Q}=(0.5,0.5,2)bold_Q = ( 0.5 , 0.5 , 2 ) and the associated fitted intensity using a Gaussian function (black lines). b) Magnetic structure in the cubic crystallographic cell (1a sites in black, 1b sites in green, 1c sites in orange).
Table 1: Spin components for the proposed structure of Yb3Ga5O12. The magnetic moment components are given in the global coordinate frame ((MXsubscript𝑀𝑋M_{X}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, MYsubscript𝑀𝑌M_{Y}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, MZsubscript𝑀𝑍M_{Z}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) notation) and in the local coordinate frame ((mxsubscript𝑚𝑥m_{x}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, mysubscript𝑚𝑦m_{y}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, mzsubscript𝑚𝑧m_{z}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) notation) at each site indicated by its crystallographic coordinates in units of a𝑎aitalic_a. The relations between the local and global coordinate frames are given in the Supplemental Material Supplement .
Site coordinates M𝑀Mitalic_M global frame m𝑚mitalic_m local frame
1a (1/8,0,1/4)18014(1/8,0,1/4)( 1 / 8 , 0 , 1 / 4 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (mx,mx,0)subscript𝑚𝑥subscript𝑚𝑥0(-m_{x},m_{x},0)( - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )
(3/8,0,3/4)38034(3/8,0,3/4)( 3 / 8 , 0 , 3 / 4 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (mx,mx,0)subscript𝑚𝑥subscript𝑚𝑥0(-m_{x},m_{x},0)( - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )
(1/4,1/8,0)14180(1/4,1/8,0)( 1 / 4 , 1 / 8 , 0 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (mx,mx,0)subscript𝑚𝑥subscript𝑚𝑥0(m_{x},m_{x},0)( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )
(3/4,3/8,0)34380(3/4,3/8,0)( 3 / 4 , 3 / 8 , 0 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,-M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , - italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (mx,mx,0)subscript𝑚𝑥subscript𝑚𝑥0(m_{x},m_{x},0)( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )
(7/8,0,3/4)78034(7/8,0,3/4)( 7 / 8 , 0 , 3 / 4 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (mx,mx,0)subscript𝑚𝑥subscript𝑚𝑥0(-m_{x},m_{x},0)( - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )
(5/8,0,1/4)58014(5/8,0,1/4)( 5 / 8 , 0 , 1 / 4 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (mx,mx,0)subscript𝑚𝑥subscript𝑚𝑥0(-m_{x},m_{x},0)( - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )
(3/4,7/8,0)34780(3/4,7/8,0)( 3 / 4 , 7 / 8 , 0 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,-M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , - italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (mx,mx,0)subscript𝑚𝑥subscript𝑚𝑥0(-m_{x},-m_{x},0)( - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )
(1/4,5/8,0)14580(1/4,5/8,0)( 1 / 4 , 5 / 8 , 0 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (mx,mx,0)subscript𝑚𝑥subscript𝑚𝑥0(-m_{x},-m_{x},0)( - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )
1b (0,1/4,1/8)01418(0,1/4,1/8)( 0 , 1 / 4 , 1 / 8 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (0,0,mz)00subscript𝑚𝑧(0,0,m_{z})( 0 , 0 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
(0,3/4,7/8)03478(0,3/4,7/8)( 0 , 3 / 4 , 7 / 8 ) (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) (0,0,mz)00subscript𝑚𝑧(0,0,m_{z})( 0 , 0 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
1c (0,3/4,3/8)03438(0,3/4,3/8)( 0 , 3 / 4 , 3 / 8 ) (MX,MX,0)subscript𝑀𝑋subscript𝑀𝑋0(-M_{X},M_{X},0)( - italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 ) (0,my,0)0subscript𝑚𝑦0(0,m_{y},0)( 0 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )
(0,1/4,5/8)01458(0,1/4,5/8)( 0 , 1 / 4 , 5 / 8 ) (MX,MX,0)subscript𝑀𝑋subscript𝑀𝑋0(-M_{X},M_{X},0)( - italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 ) (0,my,0)0subscript𝑚𝑦0(0,m_{y},0)( 0 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 )

In order to go further it is thus necessary to consider the different terms of the Hamiltonian of the system, i.e. the anisotropy and the interactions that are at play. We have recently shown that a dipolar model reproduces very well two experimental results in Yb3Ga5O12, the positive Curie-Weiss temperature θp=97subscript𝜃𝑝97\theta_{p}=97italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 97 mK and the weakly dispersive magnetic excitation spectrum in the field saturated paramagnetic phase Lhotel2 . The obtained magnetic structure should thus minimize the energy associated to dipolar interactions. Concerning the anisotropy, the crystal electric field (CEF) leads to the ground-state doublet, well separated from the first excited state (the splitting is about 67 meV) Carson ; Buchanan ; Pearson . As a result, at low temperatures the excited crystal-field levels can be ignored and Yb3+ ions are faithfully represented by effective spins S=1/2𝑆12S=1/2italic_S = 1 / 2. In the cubic unit cell, 24 ytterbium sites are split into six groups according to the local crystal-field axes (x𝑥xitalic_x, y𝑦yitalic_y, z𝑧zitalic_z), depending on the orientation of the oxygen octahedron around each site (the relations between the local and global coordinate frames are given in the Supplemental Material Supplement ). The g𝑔gitalic_g-tensor for the ground-state doublet is described by values gx=3.74subscript𝑔𝑥3.74g_{x}=3.74italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.74, gy=3.60subscript𝑔𝑦3.60g_{y}=3.60italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.60 and gz=2.85subscript𝑔𝑧2.85g_{z}=2.85italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2.85 in the local coordinate frame conventions . Hence, the doublet is fairly isotropic with a weak easy-plane anisotropy.

The combined effect of dipolar interactions, exchange interactions and anisotropy has been theoretically addressed in the early studies of gallium garnets Capel and reexamined in a recent investigation Kibalin . Such studies are nevertheless limited to 𝐤=𝟎𝐤0{\bf k}={\bf 0}bold_k = bold_0 corresponding to an intra-cell magnetic ordering of the 24 magnetic atoms. For Ising systems gzgx,gymuch-greater-thansubscript𝑔𝑧subscript𝑔𝑥subscript𝑔𝑦g_{z}\gg g_{x},\ g_{y}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, antiferromagnetic ordering occurs in a multi-axial structure with moments along the local axis z𝑧zitalic_z (so-called ”AFA states”). For a given triangle, the local z𝑧zitalic_z-axis alternates between the three X𝑋Xitalic_X, Y𝑌Yitalic_Y and Z𝑍Zitalic_Z global axes. This solution is given by a single basis vector in magnetic representations analysis (There are two such representations, odd or even with respect to the inversion). These structures occur for R=𝑅absentR=italic_R =Nd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er Hamman1 ; Hamman2 ; Hamman3 ; Cai ; Wav ; Petit ; Kibalin ; Hamman4 . In the case of nearly isotropic systems such as Yb garnet, a more complex ferrimagnetic structure was proposed, the so-called ”FC state”, arising from a three dimensional representation with nine basis vectors Capel . Note that this ferrimagnetic FC state is associated with an odd representation with respect to the inversion and an even representation also exists leading to a complex antiferromagnetic state (the odd/even classification is only valid for 𝐤=𝟎𝐤0\bf{k=0}bold_k = bold_0).

Interestingly, Yb3Ga5O12 exhibits magnetic order at 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐤12120{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ), which has not been anticipated so far in theoretical studies. Based on the results obtained for 𝐤=𝟎𝐤0{\bf k}={\bf 0}bold_k = bold_0, we propose the magnetic structure detailed in Table 1: as explained above, to be consistent with the measured intensities, the magnetic moments 1a have to be along (0, 0, MZsubscript𝑀𝑍M_{Z}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT), which actually lies in the easy local anisotropy planes of these ions, i.e with component (mx,my,0)subscript𝑚𝑥subscript𝑚𝑦0(m_{x},m_{y},0)( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 ). Such a collinear state has similarities with one possible FC state introduced in Ref. Kibalin, . For 1c magnetic moments, the refinement only imposes the (MX,MX,MZ)subscript𝑀𝑋subscript𝑀𝑋subscript𝑀𝑍(-M_{X},M_{X},M_{Z})( - italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_X end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) constraint, and it thus appears logical to put these moments in their easy-plane. This amounts to cancel the Z𝑍Zitalic_Z component, giving a (0,my,0)0subscript𝑚𝑦0(0,m_{y},0)( 0 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 0 ) moment in the local frame. Note that this orientation cancels the nearest neighbor Heisenberg exchange interaction since the nearest neighboring 1a sites have moments along Z𝑍Zitalic_Z. However an absence of ordered magnetic moment on the 1c site cannot be ruled out with our data. Theoretical studies on Ising spins on the hyperkagome lattice in the presence of long-range interactions could stabilize such magnetic configurations with paramagnetic sites (𝐤𝐤\bf{k}bold_k=0 calculation) Yoshioka , but we can expect that the less constrained anisotropy in Yb3Ga5O12 will favor the presence of an ordered moment as supposed here. Finally, for the 1b moments, a non-zero MZsubscript𝑀𝑍M_{Z}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT component (which corresponds to a mzsubscript𝑚𝑧m_{z}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT component in the local frame), which opposes to the local anisotropy, is obtained from the refinement. We propose that the other components (whose values do not impact the quality of the refinement) are zero, so that, in analogy with the FC state introduced above, the 1b moments are along (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and collinear to the 1a ones.

The final magnetic structure is shown in Figure 3b. To better visualize it, fragments of the structure are displayed in Figure 4. This view indeed points out the fact that the 1c sites separate lines / blocks of spin up and spin down magnetic moments from 1a and 1b sites: the 1c site is shared by two triangles, one with its two remaining spins along (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) and the other with its spins along the opposite directions (0,0,MZ)00subscript𝑀𝑍(0,0,-M_{Z})( 0 , 0 , - italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). Such arrays of parallel spins could be favoured by dipolar interactions, that are expected to be dominant in Yb3Ga5O12 Lhotel2 .

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Fragments of the magnetic structure highlighting the underlying organization: the spins of the 1c sites (red arrows) separate lines / blocks of up and down spins (black arrows). The shown cut corresponds to 0.25aX0.4a0.25𝑎𝑋0.4𝑎-0.25a~{}\leq~{}X~{}\leq~{}0.4a- 0.25 italic_a ≤ italic_X ≤ 0.4 italic_a, 0Y2.3b0𝑌2.3𝑏0~{}\leq~{}Y\leq~{}2.3b0 ≤ italic_Y ≤ 2.3 italic_b and 0.5cZ0.5c0.5𝑐𝑍0.5𝑐-0.5c~{}\leq~{}Z\leq~{}0.5c- 0.5 italic_c ≤ italic_Z ≤ 0.5 italic_c.

The obtained ordered moment associated to this magnetic structure is 0.61 (1) μBsubscript𝜇B\mu_{\rm B}italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We have constrained its magnitude to be equal on each site and taken into account the 6 configuration domains while assuming equal population of the 8 orientation domains. The ordered moments at T𝑇Titalic_T= 30 mK account for only about 1/3 of the saturated moments obtained in the magnetization measurements Lhotel2 . Normally, one would expect to find \approx 3/4 of the full moments at a temperature roughly twice smaller than TNsubscript𝑇𝑁T_{N}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. It is to be noted that this value of the ordered magnetic moment is robust when assuming zero magnetic moment on the 1c site. Two physical mechanisms behind the moment reduction in Yb3Ga5O12 can be considered. First, geometric frustration on the hyperkagome lattice promotes significant thermal fluctuations at T<TN𝑇subscript𝑇𝑁T<T_{N}italic_T < italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as was discussed previously for the Ising antiferromagnet Ho3Ga5O12 Zhou . Second, an even more interesting possibility is that strong quantum fluctuations for nearly isotropic spin-1/2 Yb moments reduce magnetic order even at T𝑇Titalic_T = 0 K. For comparison with other three-dimensional frustrated spin models, note that 30% moment reduction was found for the nearest-neighbor Heisenberg spin-1/2 antiferromagnet on a fcc lattice Schick22 , whereas even larger quantum effects are expected for anisotropic spin-1/2 pyrochlore antiferromagnets in the proximity to classical boundaries Zhitomirsky12 ; Yan17 . Inelastic neutron scattering at first sight appears as a promising technique to investigate the fluctuations in the ordered phase, but it is worth noting that the experimental difficulties in thermalizing Yb3Ga5O12 samples below 60 mK, while kee** reasonable background, would make these measurements on large single crystals below the transition very challenging.

We now address the puzzling result of the propagation vector 𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k=(1/2, 1/2, 0), which has never been reported to our knowledge for the magnetic structure of rare-earth garnets in zero field, where ordering with 𝐤=𝟎𝐤0{\bf k=0}bold_k = bold_0 is the paradigm. From our analysis, dipolar interactions and weak anisotropy appear to be the most important ingredients, but they are expected to give 𝐤=𝟎𝐤0{\bf k}={\bf 0}bold_k = bold_0 ordering. Non zero sub-leading antiferromagnetic exchange interactions are thus needed to stabilize the unusual propagation vector evidenced in the present neutron diffraction experiments. It is worth noting that the role of exchange interactions in Yb3Ga5O12 remains debated from previous studies above the transition temperature Sandberg ; Lhotel2 and new inelastic neutron scattering studies have been recently performed in order to gain insight into this point Deen24 .

It is interesting to compare Yb3Ga5O12 with the extensively studied sister material Gd3Ga5O12. Gadolinium ions have large semiclassical spins S𝑆Sitalic_S=7/2 with a small easy-plane anisotropy in Gd3Ga5O12 Paddison ; Bonville . No magnetic transition is known for this compound, though complex spin-spin correlations based on ten-site loops were reported that give rise to a so-called director state Paddison . A partial incommensurate ordering was also evidenced Petrenko98 , as well as spin-glass like freezing Schiffer . These properties are the consequences of competing small energy scales. It was shown that two types of next-nearest neighbor interactions (inside the hyperkagome lattice and between the two hyperkagome lattices) have to be included in the Hamiltonian to understand the observed properties even if they are much smaller than the dominant antiferromagnetic nearest neighbor interactions and dipolar interactions Yavorskii . In Gd3Ga5O12, for a magnetic field 𝐇𝐇{\bf H}bold_H applied parallel to [1,1¯,0]1¯10[1,\bar{1},0][ 1 , over¯ start_ARG 1 end_ARG , 0 ], a 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐤12120{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ) ordering vector has been reported in a narrow field range, included in a larger region of the phase diagram with four incommensurate wave-vectors Petrenko , which highlights the fragility of such a phase. Calculations show that, specifically for this field direction, soft modes leading to long range order are possible along the line (h,1h,0)10(h,1-h,0)( italic_h , 1 - italic_h , 0 ), which includes (1/2, 1/2, 0) Ancliff . This comparison with Gd3Ga5O12 suggests that in Yb3Ga5O12, the 𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k=(1/2, 1/2, 0) ordered phase results from a delicate balance between dipolar, nearest neighbor and next nearest neighbor exchange interactions.

In the present work, we have considered a single-𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k multi-domain structure but a multi-𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k structure cannot be ruled out. Multi-𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k structures are often difficult to distinguish from single-𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k ones by neutron diffraction experiments. Remarkably, in the pyrochlore lattice system Gd2Ti2O7, a 2-𝐤𝐤\bf{k}bold_k magnetic structure is now established Paddison2 with a 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,1/2)𝐤121212{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,1/2)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 ) propagation vector, while similarly to garnets, most magnetically ordered pyrochlores have a k=0 propagation vector. Other multi-𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k structures occurring for magnetic ordering at half integer reciprocal lattice vector were also theoretically shown to be stabilized in cubic spinels Zhito . Since the proposed single-𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k structure is almost collinear, further inelastic neutron scattering experiments aiming to determine the polarization of the lowest energy excitations would indicate if a more complex multi-𝐤𝐤{\bf k}bold_k structure should be considered Jensen .

To conclude, more than forty years after the discovery of the lambda anomaly at 54 mK in Yb3Ga5O12, long range static antiferromagnetic ordering is revealed with the unusual propagation vector 𝐤=(1/2,1/2,0)𝐤12120{\bf k}=(1/2,1/2,0)bold_k = ( 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 , 0 ) for the garnet lattice. The associated magnetic structure has similarities with complex spin arrangements already theoretically proposed for 𝐤𝐤\bf{k}bold_k=0 and never experimentally observed so far, even for this latter propagation vector. This emphasizes the delicate balance between the competing energy scales at play in these systems in order to realize the unique magnetic ordering pattern revealed in Yb3Ga5O12. Additionally, the reduced ordered moment points to significant fluctuations, whose origin is to be addressed by further experimental and theoretical investigations. Together with the different ground state achieved in the notorious system Gd3Ga5O12, these results highlight the rich possibilities brought by the hyperkagome lattice in the limit of small anisotropy and the importance of this geometry in the overall progress in undestanding frustrated magnetism.


We acknowledge B. Vettard, P. Fouilloux, M.-H Baurand, V. Joyet, E. Bourgeat Lami and X. Tonon for technical support. We acknowledge S. Petit and F. Damay for fruitful discussions. The structure was determined using Mag2POL and checked with Fullprof softwares. We acknowledge help from N. Qureshi for Mag2POL. E. L., C. M., and M. E. Z. acknowledge financial support from Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France, Grant No. ANR-18-CE05-0023. The neutron scattering data collected at the ILL for the present work are available at Ref. DOI1 .

References

  • (1) L. Balents, Nature 464, 199 (2010).
  • (2) M. Udagawa and L. Jaubert, eds., Spin ice, Vol. 197 (Springer, 2021).
  • (3) E. Lhotel, L. D. C. Jaubert and P. C. W Holdsworth, J. Low Temp. Phys. 201, 710 (2020).
  • (4) J. Hammann, Physics Lett. 26A, 263 (1968). 1977).
  • (5) J. Hammann and M. Ocio, Physics Lett. 55A, 195 (1975).
  • (6) J. Hammann and M. Ocio, J. Phys. France 38, 463 (1977).
  • (7) R. Wawrzyńczak, B. Tomasello, P. Manuel, D. Khalyavin, M. D. Le, T. Guidi, A. Cervellino, T. Ziman, M. Boehm, G. J. Nilsen, and T. Fennell, Phys. Rev. B 100, 094442 (2019).
  • (8) S. Petit, F. Damay, Q. Berrod, and J. M. Zanotti, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 013030 (2021).
  • (9) I. A. Kibalin, F. Damay, X. Fabréges, A. Gukassov, and S. Petit, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033509 (2020).
  • (10) J. Hammann, J. Phys. France 29, 495 (1968).
  • (11) Y. Cai, M. N. Wilson, J. Beare, C. Lygouras, G. Thomas, D. R. Yahne, K. Ross, K. M. Taddei, G. Sala, H. A. Dabkowska, A. A. Aczel, and G. M. Luke, Phys. Rev. B 100, 184415 (2019).
  • (12) J. A. M. Paddison, H. Jacobsen, O. A. Petrenko, M. T. Fernández-Diaz, P. P. Deen, A. L. Goodwin, Science 350, 179 (2015).
  • (13) L. O. Sandberg, R. Edberg, K. S. Pedersen, M. C. Hatnean, G. Balakrishnan, L. Mangin-Thro, A. Wildes, B. Fåk, G. Ehlers, G. Sala, P. Henelius, K. Lefmann, and P. P. Deen, Phys. Rev. B 104, 064425 (2021).
  • (14) E. Lhotel, L. Mangin-Thro , E. Ressouche, P. Steffens, E. Bichaud, G. Knebel, J.-P. Brison, C. Marin, S. Raymond, and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024427 (2021).
  • (15) J. Filippi, J. C. Lasjaunias, B. Hébral, J. Rossat-Mignod, and F. Tcheou, J. Phys. C: Solid State 13, 1277 (1980).
  • (16) J. A. Hodges, P. Bonville, M. Rams, and K. Królas, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15, 4631 (2003).
  • (17) P. Dalmas de Réotier, A. Yaouanc, P. C. M. Gubbens, C. T. Kaiser, C. Baines, and P. J. C. King, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167201 (2003).
  • (18) See Chapter 6 in Neutron Diffraction of Magnetic Materials, Yu. A. Izyumov, V. E. Naish and R. P. Ozerov, Consultants Bureau, Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, 1991.
  • (19) See e.g. R. Plumier, Solid State Comm. 10, 5 (1972).
  • (20) H. W. Capel, Physica 31, 1152 (1965).
  • (21) See supplemental material for more information on the magnetic symmetry and the magnetic structure refinement.
  • (22) J. W. Carson and R. L. White, J. Appl. Phy. 31, S53 (1960).
  • (23) R. A. Buchanan, K. A. Wickersheim, J. J. Pearson, and G. F. Herrmann, Phys. Rev. 159, 245 (1967).
  • (24) J. J. Pearson, G. F. Herrmann, K. A. Wickersheim, and R. A. Buchanan, Phys. Rev. 159, 251 (1967).
  • (25) The conventions are like in e.g. Ref. Kibalin with z𝑧zitalic_z a quaternary cubic axis and x𝑥xitalic_x and y𝑦yitalic_y binary axes. It is different to the one used in e.g. Ref. Paddison where x𝑥xitalic_x is the quaternary axis and y𝑦yitalic_y, z𝑧zitalic_z are binary axes.
  • (26) T. Yoshioka, A. Koga and N. Kawakami, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 73, 1805 (2004).
  • (27) H. D. Zhou, C. R. Wiebe, L. Balicas, Y. J. Yo, Y. Qiu, J. R. D. Copley and J. S. Gardner, Phys. Rev. B 78, 140406(R) (2008).
  • (28) R. Schick, O. Götze, T. Ziman, R. Zinke, J. Richter, and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Phys. Rev. B 106, 094431 (2022).
  • (29) M. E. Zhitomirsky, M. V. Gvozdikova, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and R. Moessner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 077204 (2012).
  • (30) H. Yan, O. Benton, L. Jaubert, and N. Shannon, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094422 (2017).
  • (31) P. Deen et al., private communication.
  • (32) P. Bonville, J. A. Hodges, J. P. Sanchez, and P. Vulliet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 167202 (2004).
  • (33) O. A. Petrenko, C. Ritter, M. Yethiraj and D. McK Paul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4570 (1998).
  • (34) P. Schiffer, A. P. Ramirez, D. A. Huse, P. L. Gammel, U. Yaron, D. J. Bishop, and A. J. Valentino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2379 (1995).
  • (35) T. Yavors’kii, M. Enjalran and M. J. P. Gingras, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 267203 (2006).
  • (36) O. A. Petrenko, G. Balakrishnan, D. McK Paul, M. Yethiraj, G. L. McIntyre and A. S. Wills, J. Phys. Conf. Series 145, 012026 (2009).
  • (37) M. Ancliff, V. Sachnev and N. d’Ambrumenil, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 475801 (2021).
  • (38) J. A. M. Paddison, G. Ehlers, A. B. Cairns, J. S. Gardner, O. A. Petrenko, N. P. Butch, D. M. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, H. E. Fisher, H. Zhou, A. L. Goodwin and J. R. Stewart, npj quantum materials 99 (2021).
  • (39) M. E. Zhitomirsky, M. V. Gozdikova and T. Ziman, Annals of Physics 447, 169066 (2022).
  • (40) J. Jensen and P. Bak, Phys. Rev. B 23, 6180 (1981).
  • (41) https://doi.ill.fr/10.5291/ILL-DATA.CRG-2929