Theoretical study of dissociative recombination and vibrational excitation of the BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ion by an electron impact

V. Kokoouline1 [email protected]    M. Ayouz2    J. Zs Mezei3,4,5 [email protected]    K. Hassouni4    I. F. Schneider5,6 1Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA 2LGPM, CentraleSupelec, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 3HUN-REN Institute for Nuclear Research (ATOMKI), H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary 4LSPM CNRS-UPR3407, Université Paris 13, 93430 Villetaneuse, France 5LOMC-UMR6294, CNRS, Université Le Havre Normandie, 76600 Le Havre, France 6LAC-UMR9188, CNRS Université Paris-Saclay, F-91405 Orsay, France
(May 24, 2024)
Abstract

Cross sections for dissociative recombination and electron-impact vibrational excitation of the BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT molecular ion are computed using a theoretical approach that combines the normal modes approximation for the vibrational states of the target ion and the UK R-matrix code employed to evaluate electron-ion scattering matrices for fixed geometries of the ion. Thermally-averaged rate coefficients are obtained from the cross sections for temperatures 10300010300010-300010 - 3000 K.

pacs:
33.80. -b, 42.50. Hz
preprint: APS/123-QED

Non-equilibrium plasmas produced with electrical discharges in BF3 containing feed gas present a continuously increasing interest for a large number of applications. In particular, BF3 is very often the boron carrier when plasmas are used for material processing Sennikov et al. (2017); Torigoe et al. (2016); Gonzatti et al. (2010). Basically, BF3 plasmas are used either for (i) the synthesis of ultra-hard boron compounds, e.g. boron carbides Sennikov et al. (2017), (ii) the deposition of boron nitride, an advanced material with a large number of functionalities Torigoe et al. (2016), and (iii) p-type do** by boron in the semi-conductor and photovoltaic industries Gonzatti et al. (2010); Duchaine et al. (2012). As far as do** applications are concerned, plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) processes are probably one of the most promising in terms of cost and technical performance Duchaine et al. (2012); Young et al. (2016). These processes make use of very low pressure, very high density magnetized plasmas generated in a BF3 containing feed gas. Depending on the level of the power coupled to the plasma, several cations - BF+3superscriptsubscriptabsent3{}_{3}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, BF+, B+ - and anions - e.g. F- - may be produced M. Farber and Srivastava (1984); Yong-Ki and Irikura (2000). The positive ions are then extracted from the source to an implantation chamber where the processed silicon substrate is submitted to very high negative voltage pulses. These pulses result in a large acceleration of the positive ions that are implanted in the substrate, which results in the do** of this later. The implantation depth depends on the nature and the energy distribution of the ions im**ing the substrate, while the do** level depends on the ion flux and, consequently, on the plasma density. The plasma density and the relative predominance of the different ions are determined by the ionization kinetics in the source region. The plasma sources used in PIII processes are usually magnetized Stewart and Lieberman (1991). The ambipolar diffusion in the radial direction that is perpendicular to the magnetic field is strongly reduced with respect to the parallel diffusion. Under typical plasmas conditions used in PIII processes, i.e., B100500𝐵100500B\approx 100-500italic_B ≈ 100 - 500 Gauss and p1𝑝1p\approx 1italic_p ≈ 1 Pa, the electron cyclotron frequency is the GHz range, while the electron-neutral momentum transfer collision frequency is in the MHz range, according to Eq. (5.4.5) of Lieberman and Lichtenberg (2005) the diffusion coefficient in the radial direction is reduced by approximately 6666 orders of magnitude with respect to the parallel diffusion coefficient. The characteristic time estimated for perpendicular diffusion for typical PIII reactor geometries is at the order of a hundred second, while the dissociative recombination characteristic time is around 0.10.10.10.1 s. Following a similar procedure, one can easily show that mutual neutralization is also likely to dominate diffusion losses provided the negative ion density is of the same order of magnitude as electron density, i.e. moderately electronegative plasmas. It appears therefore that under PIII discharge conditions, positive ions losses at the reactor wall are dominated by their dissociative recombination with electrons and by their neutralization by collisions with negative ions. The investigation of dissociative recombination of molecular ions is therefore of major interest for these processes. This is especially the case of BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, which is often the major ion in BF3 containing plasma in discharge conditions corresponding to PIII process Young et al. (2016). This study is a continuation of a previous work performed in the theoretical framework of the multichannel quantum defect theory on the dissociative recombination and competitive processes of BF+ Mezei et al. (2016).

The article is organized as follows. After the Introduction, Section II describes the theoretical approach used in the present calculation. In Section II, the obtained cross sections and the corresponding rate coefficients are displayed and discussed. Section III concludes the study.

I Theoretical approach

I.1 Dissociative recombination and vibrational excitation cross section formulas

Since the basic formalism used in our model is presented in detail in Refs. Douguet et al. (2011); Fonseca dos Santos et al. (2014), we restrict ourselves here to underline its major ideas. The studied molecular cation, BF2+subscriptsuperscriptabsent2{}^{+}_{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, is linear in its equilibrium geometry.

Table 1: Vibrational frequencies (in cm-1) obtained in this study and compared with previous data available in literature.
Mode symmetric stretching bending asymmetric stretching
Symmetry Σg+superscriptsubscriptΣ𝑔\Sigma_{g}^{+}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Πu+superscriptsubscriptΠ𝑢\Pi_{u}^{+}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ΠusuperscriptsubscriptΠ𝑢\Pi_{u}^{-}roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Σu+superscriptsubscriptΣ𝑢\Sigma_{u}^{+}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
ω1subscript𝜔1\omega_{1}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ω2subscript𝜔2\omega_{2}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ω3subscript𝜔3\omega_{3}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Method Reference
1062.8 469.2 2146.1 CI/ cc-pVTZ This work
1023 443 2088 MP2 Ref. Pyykko and Zhao (1990)
1030 450 CI Ref. Perić and Peyerimhoff (1993)
2026.1±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.2 Exp. Ref. Jacox and Thompson (1995)

The theoretical model starts with the following assumptions (see for example Fonseca dos Santos et al. (2014)): (i) the rotation of the molecule is neglected, (ii) the cross section is averaged over the autoionizing resonances, (iii) the autoinization lifetime is assumed to be much longer than the predissociation lifetime , and (iv) the harmonic approximation is used to describe the vibrational state of the core ion. Using (i)-(iv) and applying the frame transformation, the DR cross section is given by Eq.(13) of Fonseca dos Santos et al. (2014), in which the scattering matrix elements were expanded to first order in the normal coordinates. The cross section for vibrational excitation (VE) of the mode i𝑖iitalic_i writes

σiVE(Eel)=π24mEelgillλλ|Slλ,lλqi|2θ(Eelωi).subscriptsuperscript𝜎𝑉𝐸𝑖subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙𝜋superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi24𝑚subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙subscript𝑔𝑖subscript𝑙superscript𝑙𝜆superscript𝜆superscriptsubscript𝑆𝑙𝜆superscript𝑙superscript𝜆subscript𝑞𝑖2𝜃subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝜔𝑖\displaystyle\sigma^{VE}_{i}(E_{el})=\frac{\pi\hbar^{2}}{4mE_{el}}g_{i}\sum_{% ll^{\prime}\lambda\lambda^{\prime}}\left|\frac{\partial S_{l\lambda,l^{\prime}% \lambda^{\prime}}}{\partial{q}_{i}}\right|^{2}\theta(E_{el}-\hbar\omega_{i})\,.italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_V italic_E end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = divide start_ARG italic_π roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_m italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | divide start_ARG ∂ italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_λ , italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_ℏ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) . (1)

Here qisubscript𝑞𝑖q_{i}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, ωiPlanck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝜔𝑖\hbar\omega_{i}roman_ℏ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and gisubscript𝑔𝑖g_{i}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (i=13)𝑖13(i=1-3)( italic_i = 1 - 3 ) are respectively the dimensionless coordinate, the energy and the degeneracy of the mode i𝑖iitalic_i. The degeneracy is two for the bending mode 2 and one for the symmetric and asymmetric stretching modes. Slλ,lλsubscript𝑆𝑙𝜆superscript𝑙superscript𝜆S_{l\lambda,l^{\prime}\lambda^{\prime}}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_λ , italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is an element of the fixed-nuclei scattering matrix for electron–BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT collisions with the initial channel (λl𝜆𝑙\lambda litalic_λ italic_l) and the exit channel (λlsuperscript𝜆superscript𝑙\lambda^{\prime}l^{\prime}italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT), l𝑙litalic_l being the electron angular momentum and λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ its projections on the molecular axis. And finally, m𝑚mitalic_m is the reduced mass of the electron-ion system, Eelsubscript𝐸𝑒𝑙E_{el}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the incident energy of the electron, θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ the Heaviside step function. The present theoretical approach can describe the (de-)excitation process changing only one quanta in each normal mode of the target ion. (De-)excitation cross sections for the changing two or more quanta in a mode, are much smaller (the propensity rule) and are neglected in this study. In the present case, the initial state of the ion is the ground vibrational level, so the electron can only be captured into the first excited vibrational state of each normal mode.

The situation is similar if the electron energy is not sufficient to excite the ion and then to leave it. In such a situation, the present model suggests that the excitation probability of ion by the electron is described by the same physics, but instead of leaving the vibrationally excited ion, the electron is captured in a Rydberg resonances attached to that vibrational state, excited by the electron. If the electron is captured by the ion, the system will most likely dissociate, rather then autoionize. Correspondingly, the cross section for dissociative recombination (DR) is then obtained Fonseca dos Santos et al. (2014) as

σDR(Eel)=π24mEeli=13gillλλ|Slλ,lλqi|2θ(ωiEel).superscript𝜎𝐷𝑅subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙𝜋superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi24𝑚subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙superscriptsubscript𝑖13subscript𝑔𝑖subscript𝑙superscript𝑙𝜆superscript𝜆superscriptsubscript𝑆𝑙𝜆superscript𝑙superscript𝜆subscript𝑞𝑖2𝜃Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝜔𝑖subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙\displaystyle\sigma^{DR}(E_{el})=\frac{\pi\hbar^{2}}{4mE_{el}}\sum_{i=1}^{3}g_% {i}\sum_{ll^{\prime}\lambda\lambda^{\prime}}\left|\frac{\partial S_{l\lambda,l% ^{\prime}\lambda^{\prime}}}{\partial{q}_{i}}\right|^{2}\theta(\hbar\omega_{i}-% E_{el})\,.italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D italic_R end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = divide start_ARG italic_π roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_m italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | divide start_ARG ∂ italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_λ , italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_θ ( roman_ℏ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) . (2)

Here i𝑖iitalic_i runs over all three modes: two stretching modes ν1subscript𝜈1\nu_{1}italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ν3subscript𝜈3\nu_{3}italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (symmetric and asymmetric) with respective frequencies ω1subscript𝜔1\omega_{1}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ω3subscript𝜔3\omega_{3}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and corresponding coordinates q1subscript𝑞1q_{1}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and q3subscript𝑞3q_{3}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and a doubly degenerate transverse mode ν2subscript𝜈2\nu_{2}italic_ν start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with a lower frequency ω2subscript𝜔2\omega_{2}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and coordinates (q2x,q2y)subscript𝑞2𝑥subscript𝑞2𝑦(q_{2x},q_{2y})( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ).

To calculate the derivative of the scattering matrix Slλ,lλ/qisubscript𝑆𝑙𝜆superscript𝑙superscript𝜆subscript𝑞𝑖\partial S_{l\lambda,l^{\prime}\lambda^{\prime}}/\partial q_{i}∂ italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_λ , italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ∂ italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with respect to the normal coordinate qisubscript𝑞𝑖q_{i}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the scattering matrix is evaluated for two values of qisubscript𝑞𝑖q_{i}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT kee** the other normal coordinates qisubscript𝑞superscript𝑖q_{i^{\prime}}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT fixed at qi=0subscript𝑞superscript𝑖0q_{i^{\prime}}=0italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.

The elements Slλ,lλ(q)subscript𝑆𝑙𝜆superscript𝑙superscript𝜆𝑞S_{l\lambda,l^{\prime}\lambda^{\prime}}(\vec{q})italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_λ , italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG ) of the scattering matrix S^(q)^𝑆𝑞\hat{S}(\vec{q})over^ start_ARG italic_S end_ARG ( over→ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG ) at a given geometry q𝑞\vec{q}over→ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG specified by four normal coordinates q={q1,q2,q3,q4}={q1,q2x,q3,q2y}𝑞subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞2subscript𝑞3subscript𝑞4subscript𝑞1subscript𝑞2𝑥subscript𝑞3subscript𝑞2𝑦\vec{q}=\{q_{1},q_{2},q_{3},q_{4}\}=\{q_{1},q_{2x},q_{3},q_{2y}\}over→ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG = { italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } = { italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT } are computed from the reactance matrix K^^𝐾\hat{K}over^ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG, obtained numerically as discussed below:

S^=1^+iK^1^iK^,^𝑆^1𝑖^𝐾^1𝑖^𝐾\displaystyle\hat{S}=\frac{\hat{1}+i\hat{K}}{\hat{1}-i\hat{K}}\,,over^ start_ARG italic_S end_ARG = divide start_ARG over^ start_ARG 1 end_ARG + italic_i over^ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG end_ARG start_ARG over^ start_ARG 1 end_ARG - italic_i over^ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG end_ARG , (3)

where 1^^1\hat{1}over^ start_ARG 1 end_ARG is the identity matrix.

I.2 The properties of the BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ion and the scattering calculations

The main electronic ground state configuration Σg+1superscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΣ𝑔1{}^{1}\Sigma_{g}^{+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of the ion in its natural point group symmetry Dhsubscript𝐷D_{\infty h}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is (1σu+)2(1σg+)2(2σg+)2(2σu+)2(3σg+)2(4σg+)2(3σu+)2(1πu)2superscript1superscriptsubscript𝜎𝑢2superscript1superscriptsubscript𝜎𝑔2superscript2superscriptsubscript𝜎𝑔2superscript2superscriptsubscript𝜎𝑢2superscript3superscriptsubscript𝜎𝑔2superscript4superscriptsubscript𝜎𝑔2superscript3superscriptsubscript𝜎𝑢2superscript1superscriptsubscript𝜋𝑢2\left(1\sigma_{u}^{+}\right)^{2}\left(1\sigma_{g}^{+}\right)^{2}\left(2\sigma_% {g}^{+}\right)^{2}\left(2\sigma_{u}^{+}\right)^{2}\left(3\sigma_{g}^{+}\right)% ^{2}\left(4\sigma_{g}^{+}\right)^{2}\left(3\sigma_{u}^{+}\right)^{2}\left(1\pi% _{u}^{-}\right)^{2}( 1 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 3 italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (1πu+)2(1πg)2(1πg+)2superscript1superscriptsubscript𝜋𝑢2superscript1superscriptsubscript𝜋𝑔2superscript1superscriptsubscript𝜋𝑔2\left(1\pi_{u}^{+}\right)^{2}\left(1\pi_{g}^{-}\right)^{2}\left(1\pi_{g}^{+}% \right)^{2}( 1 italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 italic_π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The normal coordinates and the related frequencies are obtained using the cc-pVTZ basis set centered on each atom and including s𝑠sitalic_s, p𝑝pitalic_p and d𝑑ditalic_d orbitals. Performing configuration interaction (CI) calculation in the D2hsubscript𝐷2D_{2h}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT symmetry group, using the MOLPRO suite of codes Werner et al. (2012), we found equilibrium geometry of the ion with the B-F distance of 1.22151.22151.22151.2215 Å. Table 1 gives the vibrational frequencies obtained from CI calculations using cc-pVTZ basis set, and compares with the data available in literature.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Eigenphase sums as a function of the electron scattering energy Eelsubscript𝐸𝑒𝑙E_{el}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for qi=0.01subscript𝑞𝑖0.01q_{i}=0.01italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.01 (dimensionless) for the symmetric stretching (left panel), bending (right upper panel), and asymmetric stretching (right bottom panel) modes. The curves of different color correspond to different symmetries of the esuperscript𝑒e^{-}italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT–BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT system.

The electron scattering calculations were performed using the UK R-Matrix code Tennyson (2010); Carr et al. (2012) with the Quantemol-N interface Tennyson et al. (2007). The calculations were performed in the abelian subgroup D2hsubscript𝐷2D_{2h}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the target BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ion was assumed to be in its ground electronic state. In our CI model, we freeze 10 electrons in the core 1ag,2ag,3ag,1b2u,2b2u1subscript𝑎𝑔2subscript𝑎𝑔3subscript𝑎𝑔1subscript𝑏2𝑢2subscript𝑏2𝑢1a_{g},2a_{g},3a_{g},1b_{2u},2b_{2u}1 italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 2 italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 3 italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 1 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 2 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, while the remaining 12 electrons are kept free in the active space of 4ag,5ag,1b3u,2b3u,3b2u,4b2u,1b1g,1b1u,2b1u4subscript𝑎𝑔5subscript𝑎𝑔1subscript𝑏3𝑢2subscript𝑏3𝑢3subscript𝑏2𝑢4subscript𝑏2𝑢1subscript𝑏1𝑔1subscript𝑏1𝑢2subscript𝑏1𝑢4a_{g},5a_{g},1b_{3u},2b_{3u},3b_{2u},4b_{2u},1b_{1g},1b_{1u},2b_{1u}4 italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 5 italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 1 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 2 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 3 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 4 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 1 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 1 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , 2 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, 1b3g1subscript𝑏3𝑔1b_{3g}1 italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT molecular orbitals. A total of eight electronic excited target states are represented by 1844 configuration state functions (CSFs) for the ground state. All the generated states up to 16 eV were retained in the final close-coupling calculation. We used an R-matrix sphere of radius 10 bohrs and continuum Gaussian-type orbitals with partial waves up to l<4𝑙4l<4italic_l < 4. In the following, this calculation will be referred to CAS1.

Initially, several basis sets - including DZP and cc-pVTZ - were tested to investigate the stability of the target properties such as polarizability and ground state energy and, finally, we chose the cc-pVTZ basis set in order to perform the scattering calculations. Since the first electronically excited state Σg3superscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΣ𝑔3{}^{3}\Sigma_{g}^{-}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is approximately 13 eV above the dissociation limit for the ground state, this latter state is essentially isolated and the non-adiabatic effects are expected to be small. Therefore, for low electron energy collisions, i.e. bellow 10 eV, only the ground electronic state is open for ionization in e–BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT collisions, and the dimension of the geometry-fixed scattering matrix remains the same at low collision energies.

At low collision energies the fixed-nuclei scattering matrix depends only weakly on energy. A sharper energy-dependence is observed at certain relatively-high energies, corresponding to positions of Rydberg states attached to the excited electronic states of the ion. A quantity convenient for the analysis of the energy dependence of the scattering matrix is the eigenphase sum. Figure 1 displays the eigenphase sum for the three different geometries corresponding to a small displacement from equilibrium along each normal mode of the BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ion. Bending and asymmetric stretching mode calculations were performed in the C2vsubscript𝐶2𝑣C_{2v}italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT abelian subgroup, while for the symmetric mode the group D2hsubscript𝐷2D_{2h}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_h end_POSTSUBSCRIPT was used in the calculations. The variation of the eigenphase sums is smooth for energies below 6 eV. Above this value, a sharp energy dependence at certain energies is observed due to the presence of electronic Rydberg resonances attached to closed ionization limits.

II Cross sections and rate coefficients

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Vibrational excitation of BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT: probabilities corresponding to the normal vibrational modes of the target ion.

For convenience, we introduce the quantities

Pi=gi2llλλ|Slλ,lλqi|2,subscript𝑃𝑖subscript𝑔𝑖2subscript𝑙superscript𝑙𝜆superscript𝜆superscriptsubscript𝑆𝑙𝜆superscript𝑙superscript𝜆subscript𝑞𝑖2P_{i}=\frac{g_{i}}{2}\sum_{ll^{\prime}\lambda\lambda^{\prime}}\left|\frac{% \partial S_{l\lambda,l^{\prime}\lambda^{\prime}}}{\partial{q}_{i}}\right|^{2}\,,italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | divide start_ARG ∂ italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_λ , italic_l start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (4)

which could be interpreted as the probability for excitation of the vibrational mode i𝑖iitalic_i, are listed in table 2. Figure 2 shows the weakly dependence of that quantity on energy and, therefore, could be used as a constant in calculations of the thermally-averaged rate coefficients.

Table 2: Parameters of Eqs. (8) and (9) calculated at E=0.1𝐸0.1E=0.1italic_E = 0.1 eV collision energy.
Mode i𝑖iitalic_i Pisubscript𝑃𝑖P_{i}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
symmetric stretching 0.053
bending 0.20
asymmetric stretching 0.05

Using Pisubscript𝑃𝑖P_{i}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the cross sections of Eqs. (1) and (2) are written as

σiVE(Eel)=π22mEelPiθ(Eelωi),subscriptsuperscript𝜎𝑉𝐸𝑖subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙𝜋superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi22𝑚subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙subscript𝑃𝑖𝜃subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝜔𝑖\displaystyle\sigma^{VE}_{i}(E_{el})=\frac{\pi\hbar^{2}}{2mE_{el}}P_{i}\ % \theta(E_{el}-\hbar\omega_{i})\,,italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_V italic_E end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = divide start_ARG italic_π roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_m italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - roman_ℏ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , (5)
σDR(Eel)=π22mEeli=13Piθ(ωiEel).superscript𝜎𝐷𝑅subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙𝜋superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi22𝑚subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙superscriptsubscript𝑖13subscript𝑃𝑖𝜃Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝜔𝑖subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙\displaystyle\sigma^{DR}(E_{el})=\frac{\pi\hbar^{2}}{2mE_{el}}\sum_{i=1}^{3}P_% {i}\ \theta(\hbar\omega_{i}-E_{el})\,.italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D italic_R end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = divide start_ARG italic_π roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_m italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_θ ( roman_ℏ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) . (6)

Figure 3 illustrates the DR cross section σDR(Eel)superscript𝜎𝐷𝑅subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙\sigma^{DR}(E_{el})italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D italic_R end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) computed based on Eq. (5). At very low scattering energies, i.e. below 0.02 eV, the DR cross section is a smooth function inversely proportional to the incident energy of the electron, as predicted by the Wigner threshold law, whereas at higher energies, it exhibits a drop at each vibrational threshold.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Cross section for the dissociative recombination of BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The lowest vibrational threshold of each normal mode are indicated by arrows.

Due to the simple analytical form of the cross sections, the corresponding rate coefficients are easily evaluated from the general expression

α(T)=8π(2πkbT)3/20σ(Eel)exp(EelkbT)Eel𝑑Eel,𝛼𝑇8𝜋superscript2𝜋subscript𝑘𝑏𝑇32superscriptsubscript0𝜎subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙subscript𝑘𝑏𝑇subscript𝐸𝑒𝑙differential-dsubscript𝐸𝑒𝑙\displaystyle\alpha(T)=\frac{8\pi}{\left(2\pi k_{b}T\right)^{3/2}}\int_{0}^{% \infty}\sigma(E_{el})\exp\left(-\frac{E_{el}}{k_{b}T}\right)E_{el}dE_{el}\,,italic_α ( italic_T ) = divide start_ARG 8 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ ( italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) roman_exp ( - divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_ARG ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (7)

giving

αiVE(T)=2πkbT2m3/2Piexp(ωikbT),subscriptsuperscript𝛼𝑉𝐸𝑖𝑇2𝜋subscript𝑘𝑏𝑇superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscript𝑚32subscript𝑃𝑖Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝜔𝑖subscript𝑘𝑏𝑇\displaystyle\alpha^{VE}_{i}(T)=\sqrt{\frac{2\pi}{k_{b}T}}\frac{\hbar^{2}}{m^{% 3/2}}\ P_{i}\ \exp\left(-\frac{\hbar\omega_{i}}{k_{b}T}\right)\,,italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_V italic_E end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_T ) = square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_ARG end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_exp ( - divide start_ARG roman_ℏ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_ARG ) , (8)
αDR(T)=2πkbT2m3/2i=13Pi[1exp(ωikbT)].superscript𝛼𝐷𝑅𝑇2𝜋subscript𝑘𝑏𝑇superscriptPlanck-constant-over-2-pi2superscript𝑚32superscriptsubscript𝑖13subscript𝑃𝑖delimited-[]1Planck-constant-over-2-pisubscript𝜔𝑖subscript𝑘𝑏𝑇\displaystyle\alpha^{DR}(T)=\sqrt{\frac{2\pi}{k_{b}T}}\frac{\hbar^{2}}{m^{3/2}% }\ \sum_{i=1}^{3}P_{i}\ \left[1-\exp\left(-\frac{\hbar\omega_{i}}{k_{b}T}% \right)\right]\,.italic_α start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D italic_R end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_T ) = square-root start_ARG divide start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_ARG end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_ℏ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 1 - roman_exp ( - divide start_ARG roman_ℏ italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_ARG ) ] . (9)

where kbsubscript𝑘𝑏k_{b}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Boltzmann coefficient and T𝑇Titalic_T is the temperature. The thermally averaged rate coefficients for dissociative recombination and vibrational excitation are shown in Figure 4.

In order to access the uncertainty of the present theoretical model, we have performed a complete calculation of the DR and VE rate coefficients using different basis sets and orbital space in the electron-scattering calculations. The calculations were performed for three sets of parameters (1) the CAS1 with the cc-pVTZ basis set, mentioned above; (2) a calculation (referred here as cc-pVTZ CAS2) similar to (1) but with a smaller orbital space, where 8 electrons are kept free in the active space; and (3) a calculation (referred here as cc-pVQZ CAS1) similar to (1) but with the larger basis cc-pVQZ. The results are in shown in Fig. 4. The difference between the rate coefficients produced in the three calculations for the DR process and the VE of the asymmetric stretching and bending modes is about 4%percent44\%4 %. The uncertainty of the rate coefficient for the VE of the symmetric stretching mode is larger, varying in the interval 1040%10percent4010-40\%10 - 40 % for different temperatures. Notice that the overall probability for the symmetric stretching excitation is much smaller than the probabilities for other modes and DR.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Dissociative recombination and vibrational excitation of BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT: rate coefficients - Eqs. (8) and (9). To give an idea about the uncertainty of the present results, we also plotted results of two calculations with the cc-pVTZ CAS2 (dashed line) and the cc-pVQZ CAS1 (dotted line) sets of parameters of the model. For the vibrational excitation of the symmetric stretching mode, the cc-pVTZ CAS2 and cc-pVQZ CAS1 curves are indistinguishable and slightly below the cc-pVTZ CAS1 curve. For the remaining three processes, the three calculations produce the curves almost indistinguishable in the figure.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Relative importance of the dissociative recombination and vibrational excitation of BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, with respect to those of BF+.

III Conclusions and discussions

In this study, cross sections and rate coefficients for dissociative recombination and vibrational excitation of BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT by electron-impact were obtained using a theoretical approach that combines the normal modes approximation for the vibrational states of the target ion, the vibrational frame transformation, and the UK R-matrix code. The thermally averaged rate coefficients have a simple analytical form.

The obtained thermally-averaged rate coefficients are relevant for the kinetic modeling of molecule based cold non-equilibrium plasmas, in the context of complete lack of other theoretical or experimental data on these processes for this cation, and are ready to be used in the modeling of the fluorine/boron plasma for etching or implantation processes. Indeed, we are presently able to make important statements on the relative importance of BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with respect to BF+ on the population and excitation balance. In particular, as shown in Figure 5, the dissociative recombination of BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT strongly dominates that of BF+ below 7000 K, and the vibrational excitation displays the same feature below 5000 K.

The rotational structure of the target ion and of the neutral molecule was neglected in the present approach, which implies that the obtained cross sections and rate coefficients should be viewed as averaged over initial rotational states and summed over final rotational states of the corresponding initial and final vibrational levels (for vibrational excitation) or dissociative states (for dissociative recombination). Purely rotational transitions, i.e. without changing the vibrational state, might be useful to model very cold environment, below 40 K, which is not the case for the presently investigated BF3 plasma. BF+2superscriptsubscriptabsent2{}_{2}^{+}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT has no permanent dipole, so the rotational transitions are likely to have very small cross sections.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant No PHY-18-06915. Ioan F. Schneider thanks for generous financial support from La Région Haute-Normandie, via the GRR Electronique, Energie et Matériaux and the project BIOENGINE, from the Fédération de Recherche ”Energie, Propulsion, Environnement”, and from the LabEx EMC3 and FEDER via the projects PicoLIBS (ANR-10-LABEX-09-01), EMoPlaF and CO2-VIRIDIS. Ioan F. Schneider and János Zsolt Mezei acknowledge support from the CNRS via the GdR THEMS, IAEA (Vienna) via the Coordinated Research Project ”Light Element Atom, Molecule and Radical Behaviour in the Divertor and Edge Plasma Regions”, the Programme National ”Physique et Chimie du Milieu Interstellaire” (PCMI) of CNRS/INSU with INC/INP co-funded by CEA and CNES, and Fédération de Recherche ”Fusion par Confinement Magnétique” (CNRS and CEA). János Zsolt Mezei and Khalid Hassouni acknowledge support from USPC via ENUMPP and Labex SEAM. Ioan F. Schneider thanks Laboratoire Aimé Cotton for outstanding hospitality.

Data availability

Upon a reasonable request, the data supporting this article will be provided by the corresponding author.

References

  • Sennikov et al. (2017) P. G. Sennikov, R. A. Kornev, and A. I. Shishkin, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 37, 997 (2017).
  • Torigoe et al. (2016) M. Torigoe, K. Teii, and S. Matsumoto, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 44, 3219 (2016).
  • Gonzatti et al. (2010) F. Gonzatti, F. Milesi, V. Delaye, J. Duchaine, F. Torregrosa, H. Etienne, and K. Yckache, AIP Conf. Proc. 1321, 27 (2010).
  • Duchaine et al. (2012) J. Duchaine, F. Milesi, R. Coquand, S. Barraud, S. Reboh, F. Gonzatti, F. Mazen, and F. Torregrosa, AIP Conf. Proc. 1496, 71 (2012).
  • Young et al. (2016) D. L. Young, W. Nemetti, V. La Salvia, M. R. Page, S. Theingi, J. Aguiar, B. G. Lee, and P. Stardins, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 158, 68 (2016).
  • M. Farber and Srivastava (1984) M. M. Farber and R. D. Srivastava, J. Chem. Phys 81, 241 (1984).
  • Yong-Ki and Irikura (2000) K. Yong-Ki and K. K. Irikura, AIP Conf. Proc. 543, 220 (2000).
  • Stewart and Lieberman (1991) R. A. Stewart and M. A. Lieberman, J. Applied Physics 70, 3481 (1991).
  • Lieberman and Lichtenberg (2005) M. A. Lieberman and A. J. Lichtenberg, Principles of plasma discharges and materials processing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005).
  • Mezei et al. (2016) J. Z. Mezei, F. Colboc, N. N Pop, S. Ilie, K. Chakrabarti, S. Niyonzima, M. Lepers, A. Bultel, O. Dulieu, O. Motapon, et al., Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25, 055022 (2016).
  • Douguet et al. (2011) N. Douguet, A. Orel, I. Mikhailov, I. F. Schneider, C. H. Greene, and V. Kokoouline, J. Phys.: Conf. Series 300, 012015 (2011).
  • Fonseca dos Santos et al. (2014) S. Fonseca dos Santos, N. Douguet, V. Kokoouline, and A. E. Orel, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 164308 (2014).
  • Werner et al. (2012) H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, R. Lindh, F. R. Manby, M. Schütz, et al., WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2, 242 (2012).
  • Pyykko and Zhao (1990) P. Pyykko and Y. Zhao, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 7753 (1990).
  • Perić and Peyerimhoff (1993) M. Perić and S. Peyerimhoff, Mol. Phys. 78, 877 (1993).
  • Jacox and Thompson (1995) M. E. Jacox and W. E. Thompson, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 4747 (1995).
  • Tennyson (2010) J. Tennyson, Phys. Rep. 491, 29 (2010).
  • Carr et al. (2012) J. Carr, P. Galiatsatos, J. Gorfinkiel, A. Harvey, M. Lysaght, D. Madden, Z. Mašín, M. Plummer, J. Tennyson, and H. Varambhia, Euro. Phys. J. D 66, 58 (2012).
  • Tennyson et al. (2007) J. Tennyson, D. B. Brown, J. J. Munro, I. Rozum, H. N. Varambhia, and N. Vinci, J. Phys. Conf. Series 86, 012001 (2007).