License: CC BY 4.0
arXiv:2404.04154v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 05 Apr 2024

The polarisation fluctuation length scale sha** the superconducting dome of SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT

Benoît Fauqué11{}^{1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT    Shan Jiang11{}^{1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT    Tom Fennell22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT    Bertrand Roessli22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT    Alexandre Ivanov 33{}^{3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT    Celine Roux-Byl44{}^{4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT    Benoît Baptiste55{}^{5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT    Philippe Bourges66{}^{6}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT    Kamran Behnia44{}^{4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT    Yasuhide Tomioka77{}^{7}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 11{}^{1}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT JEIP (USR 3573 CNRS), Collège de France, 75005 Paris, France
22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT Laboratory for Neutron Scattering and Imaging, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
33{}^{3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT Intitut Laue Langevin, 71 avenue des Martyrs, CS 20156, 38042 Grenoble Cedex, France
44{}^{4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT Laboratoire de Physique et d’Etude de Matériaux (CNRS)
ESPCI Paris, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France
55{}^{5}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT IMPMC-Sorbonne Université and CNRS, 4, place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France
66{}^{6}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA-CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
77{}^{7}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8565, Japan
(April 5, 2024)
Abstract

Superconducting domes, ubiquitous across a variety of quantum materials, are often understood as a window favorite for pairing opened by the fluctuations of competing orders. Yet, a quantitative understanding of how such a window closes is missing. Here, we show that inelastic neutron scattering, by quantifying a length scale associated with polar fluctuations, 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, addresses this issue. We find that the superconducting dome of strontium titanate definitely ends when 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vanishes. Moreover, the product of 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the Fermi wavevector peaks close to the maximum critical temperature. Thus, this superconducting dome stems from the competition between the increase of the density of states and the unavoidable collapse of the quantum paraelectric phase, both induced by do**. The successful quantitative account of both the peak and the end of the superconducting dome implies a central role in the pairing mechanism played by the soft ferro-electric mode and its hybridisation with the acoustic branch. Such a scenario may also be at work in other quantum paraelectric materials, either bulk or interfaces.

I Introduction

In many superconducting materials such as cuprates [1], pinictides [2], heavy fermions [3], doped band insulators [4], and oxide [5] or graphene [6] heterostructures, the superconducting temperature transition (Tc𝑐{}_{c}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT) displays a dome shape as a function of the do**. Identifying the mechanisms giving rise to these domes is the subject of intense debates.

Among superconducting domes, the case of doped SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT is unique (see [7, 8] for reviews). In bulk crystals, the superconducting dome starts at a carrier concentration as low as n 5×1017similar-to-or-equalsabsent5superscript1017\simeq 5\times 10^{17}≃ 5 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 17 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT for oxygen reduced samples [9, 10], spans over more than three orders of magnitude and ends at n 1021similar-to-or-equalsabsentsuperscript1021\simeq 10^{21}≃ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, irrespective of the dopant identity [11, 12]. This corresponds to a do** level of about 5%percent\%%, an extremely low do** level compared with the threshold of superconductivity in many other matrials. Moreover, in contrast to other families, the parent compounds is not magnetic but is a quantum paraelectric. This state, characterized by a large dielectric constant ϵitalic-ϵabsent\epsilon\approxitalic_ϵ ≈ 2 ×\times× 1044{}^{4}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT [13], is driven by the softening of zone centered transverse optical (TO) phonon mode that hybridises with the transverse acoustic (TA) phonon mode at low temperature [14, 15, 16, 17].

Recently, it has been suggesting that the coupling of the electrons with ferro-electric fluctuations can lead to superconducting pairing, in particular down to very low density. This coupling can take either the form of quadratic coupling [18, 19, 20] or a Rashba type electron-TO mode coupling [10, 21, 22]. In these theories, the attractive pairing mechanism is static with an amplitude set by kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the Fermi wave-vector and 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the spatial length scale of the zero-point energy polarisation fluctuations. 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is given by the TO dispersion energy (E𝐸Eitalic_E) satisfying in the parent compound [14, 15] :

E2(q)=ωTO2[1+02q2]superscript𝐸2𝑞subscriptsuperscript𝜔2𝑇𝑂delimited-[]1subscriptsuperscript20superscript𝑞2E^{2}(q)=\omega^{2}_{TO}[1+\ell^{2}_{0}q^{2}]italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_q ) = italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ 1 + roman_ℓ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ] (1)

where 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=vTOωTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂subscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\frac{v_{TO}}{\omega_{TO}}divide start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG with ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the energy and velocity of the TO mode at the zone center.

Refer to caption

Figure 1: Do** evolution of the soft ferroelectric mode dispersion at T = 1.5 K: Momentum-and energy-resolved neutron scattering intensity map of along the (H,H,2) direction in SrTi1x1𝑥{}_{1-x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTNbx𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT with an electron density a) n(Nb)=2.4×\times×101818{}^{18}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 18 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT cm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, b) n(Nb)=2.3×\times×101919{}^{19}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 19 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT in Sr1x1𝑥{}_{1-x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTLax𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT with c) n(Nb)=1.8×\times×102020{}^{20}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 20 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT and d) n(La)=1.0×\times×102121{}^{21}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 21 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT at T = 1.5 K. e) Dispersion of the soft ferro-electric mode along [H,H,0] for the five do** studied as function of H22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. f) same as e) along [H,0,0]. For all the do** the dispersion can be fitted through : E2(q)superscript𝐸2𝑞E^{2}(q)italic_E start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_q )=ωTO2subscriptsuperscript𝜔2𝑇𝑂\omega^{2}_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT+vTO2q2subscriptsuperscript𝑣2𝑇𝑂superscript𝑞2v^{2}_{TO}q^{2}italic_v start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where q[1,1,0]=2πa22𝜋𝑎2\frac{2\pi}{a}\sqrt{2}divide start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARGH and q[1,0,0]=2πa2𝜋𝑎\frac{2\pi}{a}divide start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG start_ARG italic_a end_ARGH where a𝑎aitalic_a is the lattice parameter of SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, that allows one to determine 0=vTOωTOsubscript0subscript𝑣𝑇𝑂subscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\ell_{0}=\frac{v_{TO}}{\omega_{TO}}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG. Black arrows on a-d) indicate the position of ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Refer to caption

Figure 2: Do** evolution of the soft ferro-electric mode properties at T = 1.5 K: a) E-scans at 𝐐=(0,0,2)𝐐002{\bf{Q}}=(0,0,2)bold_Q = ( 0 , 0 , 2 ) for five electron doped samples. Curves are shifted for clarity. b) ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs. n𝑛nitalic_n in linear-log scale in oxygen reduced STO (green points from [23]), in Nb-doped STO (close circle points are INS data, open squares are from infrared measurements from [24]), in La-doped STO (close red circles). Inset : ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs. n𝑛nitalic_n in linear scale. c) vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs. n𝑛nitalic_n in linear-log scale in Nb and La doped STO deduced from the fit of the dispersion shown in Fig. 1. Inset : vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs. n𝑛nitalic_n in linear scale d) Energy width (ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ) of the TO mode at T = 1.5 K. e) Intensity of the TO mode normalised with the TA mode intensity at T = 150 K and 𝐐𝐐{\bf{Q}}bold_Q=(0.05,0.05,2). Error bars are deduced from the convolution fitter that finds the best least-squares fit of the dispersion parameters (see Supplementary Material section B).
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Temperature dependence of the soft ferroelectric mode: a) and b) Temperature dependence of ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for the five do** studied compare with the parent compound values from [14] (in black open circle points). c) Amplitude of the TA softening at 𝐐𝐐\bf{Q}bold_Q=(0.05,0.05,2) versus temperature for three do**s compare with the parent compound behavior (in black open square points from [17]). As the TO mode harder the TA softening vanishes consequence of the decrease of the coupling between both modes.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, Tc𝑐{}_{c}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT and kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT: a) Do** evolution of 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=vTOωTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂subscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\frac{v_{TO}}{\omega_{TO}}divide start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG (in blue and red points), deduced from Fig.2, kF=(3π2n)13subscript𝑘𝐹superscript3superscript𝜋2𝑛13k_{F}=(3\pi^{2}n)^{\frac{1}{3}}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 3 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (in black dot line) and a2𝑎2\frac{a}{2}divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG (in gray dot line) where a𝑎aitalic_a = 3.9 Åitalic-Å\AAitalic_Å is the lattice parameter of SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT. b) Do** evolution of the superconducting critical temperature (Tc𝑇𝑐Tcitalic_T italic_c) according to [11, 25, 12]. With electron do** 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decreases and saturate to about a2𝑎2\frac{a}{2}divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG while kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increasing. The gray areas in a and b) mark the end of the superconducting dome concomitant with the saturation of 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to about a2𝑎2\frac{a}{2}divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG. c) kF0subscript𝑘𝐹subscript0k_{F}\ell_{0}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs. n𝑛nitalic_n and displays a dome shape. Inset : sketch of the electron do** evolution of 202subscript02\ell_{0}2 roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (blue disk) and 2kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (black dot arrows). The summit of the superconducting dome occurs when kF0subscript𝑘𝐹subscript0k_{F}\ell_{0}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the largest, see the text.

Here, we present the first systematic study of the dispersion of the soft ferro-electric phonon mode in electron doped SrTi1x1𝑥{}_{1-x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTNbx𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT and Sr1x1𝑥{}_{1-x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTLax𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT. Using inelastic neutron scattering (INS), a probe that allows a determination of 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we track its decrease with do** as a result of the hardening of the TO-mode, the decrease of the speed of the TO mode and the breakdown of the TO/TA hybridisation. Comparing 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT unveils the two length scales sha** the superconducting dome of SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT. With the electron do**, kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases while 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT shrinks and saturates to half of the lattice parameter value at n1021similar-to-or-equalsabsentsuperscript1021\simeq 10^{21}≃ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 21 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. Thus, the end of the superconducting dome and the breakdown of the quantum paraelectric state are concomitant. Our result provides direct evidence of the key role of the soft TO mode and its hybridisation with the TA mode in the superconducting dome of quantum paraelectrics.

II Results

Fig.1a-d) show the dispersion of the soft ferro-electric mode as measured by INS along the (H,H,0) direction for carrier densities ranging from 2.4×\times×101818{}^{18}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 18 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT to 1.0×\times×102121{}^{21}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 21 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT at T = 1.5 K. The identity of the dopants (La or Nb), is indicated in parentheses for each carrier density. Description of the samples, their characterisation by electrical transport measurements and the spectrometers configurations are given in the Supplementary Material section A. Fig.2a) shows the energy scans at 𝐐𝐐\bf{Q}bold_Q=(0,0,2) for five of the samples studied at T = 1.5 K. The soft TO mode begins to harden when the carrier density exceed 2.3×\times×101919{}^{19}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 19 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT.

Convolution of the phonon spectral function with the resolution spectrometer function (see Supplementary Material section B), allows accurate fits and independent determination of ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the energy width of the TO-mode (ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ). In the whole do** range, the energy dispersion of the TO mode satisfies Eq.1 along both directions (H,H,2) and (H,2,0), see Fig.1e)-f).

Fig.2b-d) show the deduced do** evolution of ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ. As function of the do** ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases from 2.1 meV at n𝑛nitalic_n(Nb)=2.4×\times×101919{}^{19}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 19 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, comparable with the value in pure SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, to 17.0 meV at n𝑛nitalic_n(La)=1.6×\times×102121{}^{21}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 21 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. This sudden hardening of the TO mode is accompanied by a slight decrease of vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at low temperature of about 40%percent\%% and a slight decrease of its energy width. We note, like in pure SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT [14, 15], no anisotropy in the TO-dispersion across the do** range studied (vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(𝐐//[1,1,0]{\bf{Q}}//[1,1,0]bold_Q / / [ 1 , 1 , 0 ])\approx vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(𝐐//[1,0,0]{\bf{Q}}//[1,0,0]bold_Q / / [ 1 , 0 , 0 ]).

The collapse of the quantum para-electric regime upon do** is further supported by the temperature dependence of ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT shown on Fig.3a and b). Up to n𝑛nitalic_n(Nb)=2.4×\times×101919{}^{19}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 19 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTcm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT the T-dependence of ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT show almost no difference from the parent compound [14] (black open square points in Fig.1 a) and b)). Above this concentration, the TO mode becomes almost temperature independent. At the highest do** studied, the system is no more in the quantum para-electric phase. vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in contrast, barely changes with temperature and decreases by 40%percent\%% with do**.

Previous studies documented hybridization between the TO and TA branches in the undoped SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT [14, 15, 17]. This hybridisation, a consequence of the anharmonic coupling phonon modes [16], is concomitant with the softening of the TO mode. It manifests itself in two ways. First, there is a dramatic transfer of intensity from the TA branch toward the TO mode 𝐐𝐐{\bf{Q}}bold_Q=(0,0,2) [14, 16]. Second, the TA mode itself softens at a finite wave-vector [17]. The latter feature has been recently ascribed to a flexo-electric effect [26]. According to our results, do** not only hardens the TO mode, but also weakens the TO-TA hybridization. With increasing do**, the absolute intensity of the TO mode, normalised by the amplitude of the TA mode at high temperature in each samples (see Supplementary Material section B), decreases by about a factor four (see Fig.2e)). Simultaneously, the TA softening, measured at 𝐐𝐐{\bf{Q}}bold_Q=(0.05,0.05,2), decreases and vanishes at the highest do** (see Fig.1c)). Thus, the hardening of the TO mode is accompanied with the weakening of its coupling with the TA mode. As a result, the spectral weight transfer and the softening of the TA mode both eventually vanish with do**. The breakdown of the quantum para-electric regime is thus concomitant with the breakdown of the TO-TA hybridization, providing another evidence that both effects are intimately related.

III Discussion

Our measurement allows us to quantify, for the first time, the do** evolution of 0=vTOωTOsubscript0subscript𝑣𝑇𝑂subscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\ell_{0}=\frac{v_{TO}}{\omega_{TO}}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG, (see Fig.4a). Due to the combined change of ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and vTOsubscript𝑣𝑇𝑂v_{TO}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decreases by more than one order of magnitude with the do** and saturates to a2𝑎2\frac{a}{2}divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG, where a𝑎aitalic_a is the lattice parameter, above n𝑛nitalic_n \approx 1×\times×102121{}^{21}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 21 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT cm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The comparison of the do** evolution of 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with Tc𝑐{}_{c}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT is a clue to the end of the superconducting dome of SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT. Fig.4b) shows the superconducting domes for SrTi1x1𝑥{}_{1-x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTNbx𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, Sr1x1𝑥{}_{1-x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTLax𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT [12] and SrTi(1818{}^{18}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 18 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTO16ysuperscriptsubscriptabsent𝑦16{}_{y}^{16}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 16 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTO1y1𝑦{}_{1-y}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_y end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT)3δ3𝛿{}_{3-\delta}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 - italic_δ end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT [25]. No matter the nature of the dopants, all the domes end at a carrier density of n𝑛absentn\approxitalic_n ≈ 1×\times×102121{}^{21}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 21 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT cm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT. The end of the superconducting domes is thus concomitant with the saturation of 0a2subscript0𝑎2\ell_{0}\approx\frac{a}{2}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ divide start_ARG italic_a end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG, i.e. the end of the quantum-para-electric regime. We note that our do** evolution of ωTOsubscript𝜔𝑇𝑂\omega_{TO}italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T italic_O end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is in good agreement with early infra-red measurements [24] in SrTi1x1𝑥{}_{1-x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTNbx𝑥{}_{x}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT and INS measurements in oxygen reduced SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT [23].

The key role of 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in sha** the superconducting dome of SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT is further highlighted once it is compared with the density of states length scale, kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. For Nb and La doped samples the evolution of the Fermi surface is well captured by the rigid band approximation [27, 28]. It is formed by three non-parabolic bands located at the ΓΓ\Gammaroman_Γ point that are successfully fill. For sake of simplicity, we will consider the case of a single isotropic band where n𝑛nitalic_n=kF33π2subscriptsuperscript𝑘3𝐹3superscript𝜋2\frac{k^{3}_{F}}{3\pi^{2}}divide start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG. kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs. n𝑛nitalic_n is shown on Fig.4a) with black dot line. With the carrier density increasing, kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases, while 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT decreases. Interestingly, kF0subscript𝑘𝐹subscript0k_{F}\ell_{0}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT displays a dome shape which peaks at n𝑛nitalic_n = 3×\times×101919{}^{19}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 19 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT cm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT, the middle of the superconducting domes of doped SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT, see Fig.4c). This comparison allows us to draw a simple picture to the do** evolution of Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, sketched in the insert of Fig.4c). At low do**, where 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT \approx 3 nm, Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT increases due to the increase of kFsubscript𝑘𝐹k_{F}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT up to n𝑛nitalic_n = 3×\times×101919{}^{19}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 19 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT cm33{}^{-3}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT where 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start to decrease. Above this level 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT becomes too short to give rise to the maximum superconducting pairing amplitude and Tc𝑐{}_{c}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT drops following 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

So far, the overdoped regime has been understood as the end of the anti-adiabatic regime [29] and as the passage from the clean to dirty limit [30]. Our result identifies the length scale 0subscript0\ell_{0}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT which drives the decrease of Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and of the superconducting gap, ΔΔ\Deltaroman_Δ, whose ratio has been found constant to the weak-coupling BCS value across the dome [31, 29]. Qualitatively, this result is consistent with quantum critical theories applied to ferro-electrics [32, 33, 34] and with theoretical works where electrons are coupled with the soft TO-mode [18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Combined with the known Fermi surface probed by quantum oscillations studies [35, 27, 9, 28], our result provides the parameters to quantitatively test theories of superconductivity in SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT as well as it helps to understand the electron do** evolution of the unusual thermal conductivity [36], isotropic magnto-resistance [37] and T2superscript𝑇2T^{2}italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-therm resistivity [38, 39] in doped SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT.

In conclusion, we show that the end of the superconducting dome of bulk SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT is concomitant with the collapse of the quantum para-electric regime. This result demonstrates the key role of the soft TO mode and its hybridisation with the TA branch in the superconductivity of quantum paraelectrics and their interface.

IV Acknowledgements

We thank M. Feigelman, R. Fernandes, D. Kiseliov, M. Gastiasoro, G. Guzmán-Verri, R. Lobo, P. Littlewood, A. Subedi and D. Van Der Marel for useful discussions. This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-CE92-0020-01), by Jeunes Equipes de l{}^{\prime}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTInstitut de Physique du Collège de France and by a grant attributed by the Ile de France regional council. This work was also supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 23H01135.

References

  • Keimer et al. [2015] B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature 518, 179 (2015).
  • Fernandes et al. [2022] R. M. Fernandes, A. I. Coldea, H. Ding, I. R. Fisher, P. J. Hirschfeld, and G. Kotliar, Iron pnictides and chalcogenides: a new paradigm for superconductivity, Nature 601, 35 (2022).
  • White et al. [2015] B. White, J. Thompson, and M. Maple, Unconventional superconductivity in heavy-fermion compounds, Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 514, 246 (2015), superconducting Materials: Conventional, Unconventional and Undetermined.
  • Bustarret [2015] E. Bustarret, Superconductivity in doped semiconductors, Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 514, 36 (2015), superconducting Materials: Conventional, Unconventional and Undetermined.
  • Zubko et al. [2011] P. Zubko, S. Gariglio, M. Gabay, P. Ghosez, and J.-M. Triscone, Interface Physics in Complex Oxide Heterostructures, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 2, 141 (2011)https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140445 .
  • Balents et al. [2020] L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moiré flat bands, Nature Physics 16, 725 (2020).
  • Collignon et al. [2019] C. Collignon, X. Lin, C. W. Rischau, B. Fauqué, and K. Behnia, Metallicity and Superconductivity in Doped Strontium Titanate, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 25 (2019).
  • Gastiasoro et al. [2020] M. N. Gastiasoro, J. Ruhman, and R. M. Fernandes, Superconductivity in dilute SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT: A review, Annals of Physics 417, 168107 (2020).
  • Lin et al. [2013] X. Lin, Z. Zhu, B. Fauqué, and K. Behnia, Fermi Surface of the Most Dilute Superconductor, Phys. Rev. X 3, 021002 (2013).
  • Yoon et al. [2021a] H. Yoon, A. G. Swartz, S. P. Harvey, H. Inoue, Y. Hikita, Y. Yu, S. B. Chung, S. Raghu, and H. Y. Hwang, Low-density superconductivity in SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT bounded by the adiabatic criterion, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2106.10802 (2021a).
  • Tomioka et al. [2019] Y. Tomioka, N. Shirakawa, K. Shibuya, and I. H. Inoue, Enhanced superconductivity close to a non-magnetic quantum critical point in electron-doped strontium titanate, Nature Communications 10, 738 (2019).
  • Tomioka et al. [2022] Y. Tomioka, N. Shirakawa, and I. H. Inoue, Superconductivity enhancement in polar metal regions of Sr0.950.95{}_{0.95}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0.95 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTBa0.050.05{}_{0.05}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0.05 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT and Sr0.9850.985{}_{0.985}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0.985 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCa0.0150.015{}_{0.015}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0.015 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT revealed by systematic Nb do**, npj Quantum Materials 7, 111 (2022).
  • Müller and Burkard [1979] K. A. Müller and H. Burkard, SrTiO3subscriptO3{\mathrm{O}}_{3}roman_O start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT: An intrinsic quantum paraelectric below 4 K, Phys. Rev. B 19, 3593 (1979).
  • Yamada and Shirane [1969] Y. Yamada and G. Shirane, Neutron Scattering and Nature of the Soft Optical Phonon in SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTJournal of the Physical Society of Japan 26, 396 (1969)https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.26.396 .
  • Courtens et al. [1993] E. Courtens, G. Coddens, B. Hennion, B. Hehlen, J. Pelous, and R. Vacher, Phonon anomalies in SrTiO3subscriptSrTiO3\mathrm{SrTiO_{3}}roman_SrTiO start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the quantum paraelectric regime, Physica Scripta T49B, 430 (1993).
  • He et al. [2020] X. He, D. Bansal, B. Winn, S. Chi, L. Boatner, and O. Delaire, Anharmonic Eigenvectors and Acoustic Phonon Disappearance in Quantum Paraelectric SrTiO3subscriptSrTiO3{\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3}roman_SrTiO start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. Lett. 124, 145901 (2020).
  • Fauqué et al. [2022] B. Fauqué, P. Bourges, A. Subedi, K. Behnia, B. Baptiste, B. Roessli, T. Fennell, S. Raymond, and P. Steffens, Mesoscopic fluctuating domains in strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. B 106, L140301 (2022).
  • van der Marel et al. [2019] D. van der Marel, F. Barantani, and C. W. Rischau, Possible mechanism for superconductivity in doped SrTiO3subscriptSrTiO3{\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3}roman_SrTiO start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. Research 1, 013003 (2019).
  • Kiselov and Feigel’man [2021] D. E. Kiselov and M. V. Feigel’man, Theory of superconductivity due to Ngai’s mechanism in lightly doped SrTiO3subscriptSrTiO3{\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3}roman_SrTiO start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. B 104, L220506 (2021).
  • Volkov et al. [2022] P. A. Volkov, P. Chandra, and P. Coleman, Superconductivity from energy fluctuations in dilute quantum critical polar metals, Nature Communications 13, 4599 (2022).
  • Yu et al. [2022] Y. Yu, H. Y. Hwang, S. Raghu, and S. B. Chung, Theory of superconductivity in doped quantum paraelectrics, npj Quantum Materials 7, 63 (2022).
  • Gastiasoro et al. [2022] M. N. Gastiasoro, M. E. Temperini, P. Barone, and J. Lorenzana, Theory of superconductivity mediated by Rashba coupling in incipient ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. B 105, 224503 (2022).
  • Bäuerle et al. [1980] D. Bäuerle, D. Wagner, M. Wöhlecke, B. Dorner, and H. Kraxenberger, Soft modes in semiconducting SrTiO3: II. The ferroelectric mode, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter 38, 335 (1980).
  • Devreese et al. [2010] J. T. Devreese, S. N. Klimin, J. L. M. van Mechelen, and D. van der Marel, Many-body large polaron optical conductivity in SrTi1xNbxO3subscriptSrTi1𝑥subscriptNb𝑥subscriptO3{\text{SrTi}}_{1-x}{\text{Nb}}_{x}{\text{O}}_{3}SrTi start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 - italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Nb start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT O start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. B 81, 125119 (2010).
  • Rischau et al. [2017] C. W. Rischau, X. Lin, C. P. Grams, D. Finck, S. Harms, J. Engelmayer, T. Lorenz, Y. Gallais, B. Fauqué, J. Hemberger, and K. Behnia, A ferroelectric quantum phase transition inside the superconducting dome of Sr1xCaxTiO3dsubscriptSr1xsubscriptCaxsubscriptTiO3d\mathrm{Sr_{1-x}Ca_{x}TiO_{3-d}}roman_Sr start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 - roman_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ca start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_TiO start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 - roman_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPTNature Physics 13, 643 (2017).
  • Guzmán-Verri et al. [2023] G. G. Guzmán-Verri, C. H. Liang, and P. B. Littlewood, Lamellar Fluctuations Melt Ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 046801 (2023).
  • Allen et al. [2013] S. J. Allen, B. Jalan, S. Lee, D. G. Ouellette, G. Khalsa, J. Jaroszynski, S. Stemmer, and A. H. MacDonald, Conduction-band edge and Shubnikov–de Haas effect in low-electron-density SrTiO3subscriptSrTiO3\mathrm{SrTiO_{3}}roman_SrTiO start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. B 88, 045114 (2013).
  • Fauqué et al. [2023] B. Fauqué, C. Collignon, H. Yoon, Ravi, X. Lin, I. I. Mazin, H. Y. Hwang, and K. Behnia, Electronic band sculpted by oxygen vacancies and indispensable for dilute superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033080 (2023).
  • Yoon et al. [2021b] H. Yoon, A. G. Swartz, S. P. Harvey, H. Inoue, Y. Hikita, Y. Yu, S. B. Chung, S. Raghu, and H. Y. Hwang, Low-density superconductivity in SrTiO33{}_{3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT bounded by the adiabatic criterion (2021b), arXiv:2106.10802 [cond-mat.supr-con] .
  • Collignon et al. [2017] C. Collignon, B. Fauqué, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, D. Mailly, and K. Behnia, Superfluid density and carrier concentration across a superconducting dome: The case of strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. B 96, 224506 (2017).
  • Thiemann et al. [2018] M. Thiemann, M. H. Beutel, M. Dressel, N. R. Lee-Hone, D. M. Broun, E. Fillis-Tsirakis, H. Boschker, J. Mannhart, and M. Scheffler, Single-Gap Superconductivity and Dome of Superfluid Density in Nb-Doped SrTiO3SrTisubscriptO3{\mathrm{SrTi}\text{O}}_{3}roman_SrTi O start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. Lett. 120, 237002 (2018).
  • Edge et al. [2015] J. M. Edge, Y. Kedem, U. Aschauer, N. A. Spaldin, and A. V. Balatsky, Quantum Critical Origin of the Superconducting Dome in SrTiO3subscriptSrTiO3{\mathrm{SrTiO}}_{3}roman_SrTiO start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTPhys. Rev. Lett. 115, 247002 (2015).
  • Rowley et al. [2014] S. E. Rowley, L. J. Spalek, R. P. Smith, M. P. M. Dean, M. Itoh, J. F. Scott, G. G. Lonzarich, and S. S. Saxena, Ferroelectric quantum criticality, Nature Physics 10, 367 (2014).
  • Enderlein et al. [2020] C. Enderlein, J. F. de Oliveira, D. A. Tompsett, E. B. Saitovitch, S. S. Saxena, G. G. Lonzarich, and S. E. Rowley, Superconductivity mediated by polar modes in ferroelectric metals, Nature Communications 11, 4852 (2020).
  • Uwe et al. [1985] H. Uwe, R. Yoshizaki, T. Sakudo, A. Izumi, and T. Uzumaki, Conduction Band Structure of SrTiO3subscriptSrTiO3\mathrm{SrTiO_{3}}roman_SrTiO start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPTJapanese Journal of Applied Physics 24, 335 (1985).
  • Martelli et al. [2018] V. Martelli, J. L. Jiménez, M. Continentino, E. Baggio-Saitovitch, and K. Behnia, Thermal Transport and Phonon Hydrodynamics in Strontium Titanate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 125901 (2018).
  • Collignon et al. [2020] C. Collignon, P. Bourges, B. Fauqué, and K. Behnia, Heavy Nondegenerate Electrons in Doped Strontium Titanate, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031025 (2020).
  • Lin et al. [2015] X. Lin, B. Fauqué, and K. Behnia, Scalable T22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT resistivity in a small single-component Fermi surface, Science 349, 945 (2015).
  • Kumar et al. [2021] A. Kumar, V. I. Yudson, and D. L. Maslov, Quasiparticle and Nonquasiparticle Transport in Doped Quantum Paraelectrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 076601 (2021).
  • Rischau et al. [2022] C. W. Rischau, D. Pulmannová, G. W. Scheerer, A. Stucky, E. Giannini, and D. van der Marel, Isotope tuning of the superconducting dome of strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 013019 (2022).
  • Hameed et al. [2022] S. Hameed, D. Pelc, Z. W. Anderson, A. Klein, R. J. Spieker, L. Yue, B. Das, J. Ramberger, M. Lukas, Y. Liu, M. J. Krogstad, R. Osborn, Y. Li, C. Leighton, R. M. Fernandes, and M. Greven, Enhanced superconductivity and ferroelectric quantum criticality in plastically deformed strontium titanate, Nature Materials 21, 54 (2022).