Uncovering the Ghostly Remains of an Extremely Diffuse Satellite in the Remote Halo of NGC 253 111This research is based on data collected at the Subaru Telescope, which is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
Abstract
We present the discovery of NGC253-SNFC-dw1, a new satellite galaxy in the remote stellar halo of the Sculptor Group spiral, NGC 253. The system was revealed using deep resolved star photometry obtained as part of the Subaru Near-Field Cosmology Survey that uses the Hyper Suprime-Cam on the Subaru Telescope. Although rather luminous () and massive (), the system is one of the most diffuse satellites yet known, with a half-light radius of kpc and an average surface brightness of mag arcmin within the . The colour-magnitude diagram shows a dominant old ( Gyr) and metal-poor ( dex) stellar population, as well as several candidate thermally-pulsing asymptotic giant branch stars. The distribution of red giant branch stars is asymmetrical and displays two elongated tidal extensions pointing towards NGC 253, suggestive of a highly disrupted system being observed at apocenter. NGC253-SNFC-dw1 has a size comparable to that of the puzzling Local Group dwarfs Andromeda XIX and Antlia 2 but is two magnitudes brighter. While unambiguous evidence of tidal disruption in these systems has not yet been demonstrated, the morphology of NGC253-SNFC-dw1 clearly shows that this is a natural path to produce such diffuse and extended galaxies. The surprising discovery of this system in a previously well-searched region of the sky emphasizes the importance of surface brightness limiting depth in satellite searches.
1 Introduction
The CDM cosmological model predicts that galaxies form hierarchically; large galaxies like the Milky Way originate from small over-densities in the primordial matter distribution and grow via the agglomeration of numerous smaller building blocks, some of which survive later merging and represent the present-day dwarf satellites (e.g. Bullock & Johnston, 2005; Pillepich et al., 2014). The numbers and properties of satellite galaxies around massive hosts has emerged as a powerful way to test the CDM paradigm on small scales as well as the physics of galaxy formation (e.g. Bullock & Boylan-Kolchin, 2017; Sales et al., 2022). As a result, there has been much interest in characterising the satellite system of the Milky Way and its nearest neighbours (e.g. Homma et al., 2019; Carlsten et al., 2022; Doliva-Dolinsky et al., 2023). Although the sample size beyond the Local Group (LG) is still limited, such observations are critical to benchmark results from the Milky Way and M31. Recent wide-field imaging and/or survey campaigns are having remarkable success in uncovering new satellites around Local Volume galaxies (e.g. Chiboucas et al., 2013; Crnojević et al., 2016; Okamoto et al., 2019; Mutlu-Pakdil et al., 2022) but these studies rapidly lose sensitivity at surface brightnesses mag arcsec, raising questions about what they might be missing.
NGC 253, lying at D Mpc (Radburn-Smith et al., 2011), is a barred spiral galaxy located in the Sculptor group. It has a similar luminosity and virial radius to the Milky Way and M31 (Karachentsev et al., 2013; Mutlu-Pakdil et al., 2021), making it a prime object for comparative studies with the LG spirals. An extended and structured stellar halo has long been known in this galaxy, detected in both integrated light (e.g. Beck et al., 1982; Malin & Hadley, 1997) and resolved star counts (Davidge, 2010; Bailin et al., 2011; Greggio et al., 2014; Harmsen et al., 2017). It also hosts a rich population of halo globular clusters (Cantiello et al., 2018).
In recent years, attention has focused on the faint satellite system of NGC 253. The PISCeS survey used Magellan/Megacam resolved star photometry to discover five new dwarf satellites of NGC 253 (Sand et al., 2014; Toloba et al., 2016; Mutlu-Pakdil et al., 2022), with two of them, Scl-MM-dw2 (hereafter MM-dw2) and Scl-MM-dw3, independently discovered as NGC253-dw2 by Romanowsky et al. (2016) and Donatiello II by Martínez-Delgado et al. (2021), respectively. Martínez-Delgado et al. (2021) proposed two further dwarf galaxy candidates from Dark Energy Survey data and Carlsten et al. (2022) suggested two others from DECaLS data, both from integrated light analyses. Mutlu-Pakdil et al. (2024) confirm three of these latter systems with Hubble Space Telescope photometry and undertake a comprehensive study of the NGC 253 satellite system as a whole, finding it to be deficient in luminous satellites compared systems of similar stellar mass.
In this Letter, we report the discovery of a highly-disrupted satellite galaxy in the outer halo of NGC 253. Although luminous, the system is extremely diffuse and thus has been missed by all previous searches in this part of the sky. The discovery represents the first result from the “Subaru Near Field Cosmology” survey (hereafter SNFC), a systematic imaging survey of a sample of late-type galaxies in the Local Volume in order to study their resolved stellar halos. In Section 2, we summarize the observations and data reduction methodology. We derive the physical properties of the dwarf, which we name NGC 253-SNFC-dw1 (hereafter SNFC-dw1), in Section 3 and discuss and conclude in Section 4.
2 Observation and data
We observed three pointings around NGC 253 using the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) on the Subaru 8.2m telescope (left panel of Figure 1). The HSC comprises 104 CCD detectors and provides a field-of-view (FOV) of 1.76 with a pixel scale of 0.17″(Miyazaki et al., 2018). The observations were obtained in queue-mode as part of the open-use SNFC intensive program during the period 2019-2022. For NGC 253, - and -band images were acquired under seeing conditions ranging from 0.7-1.0″. For the two northern fields, we obtained a total exposure time of 12500 sec and 2750 sec in the - and -bands, respectively. In the southern field, we obtained the same exposure time in the -band but the -band exposures amounted to only 6000 sec; furthermore, the seeing was slightly worse in this field than in the northern fields. Our exposure times are designed to provide sensitivity to a broad range of stellar metallicities, including the most metal-rich halo stars.
The data were processed using the reduction pipeline hscPipe 8.4 (Bosch et al., 2018), which is based on a software suite being developed for the Vera C. Rubin Observatory data (Axelrod et al., 2010; Jurić et al., 2017; Ivezić et al., 2019). Each frame was corrected for bias, dark, and flat-fielding, and then the sky was modeled internally and subtracted with an aggressive 32-pixel mesh. The frames in each filter were calibrated using Pan-STARRS1 catalog (Magnier et al., 2013; Chambers et al., 2016), then mosaicked and coadded. The final photometry is in the HSC filter system and in AB magnitudes. Forced photometry based on the point spread function (PSF), CModel, and Kron model was performed on the coadded images, with the -band image providing the initial detections. Extended sources were excluded by considering the PSF to CModel flux ratio, following Pucha et al. (2019). In particular, we classified an object as a point-source if the flux ratio is within of unity in the -band. The point-source detection limits of the coadded images were and with SNR for the northern two fields and and with SNR for the southern field. These depths correspond to roughly 1.5 to 2 mag below the tip of red giant branch (TRGB) at the distance of NGC 253 (Radburn-Smith et al., 2011).
The Galactic extinction corrections were taken from the Schlegel et al. (1998) reddening map using the coefficients from Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011). We applied an extinction correction to each source individually according to its location, assuming a Fitzpatrick (1999) reddening law with . The mean reddening across the field is rather small, amounting to .
Artificial star tests were performed on the coadded images to estimate the accuracy and completeness of the photometric catalog. Artificial point sources were created using the PSF models generated by the pipeline and injected into the coadded images as described in Ogami et al. (2024). The resulting images were processed in the same way as the original ones. About 30,000 artificial stars were added to the images in intervals of 1.0 mag from 20 mag to 24 mag, and 0.5 mag from 24 mag to 28 mag, in both the - and -bands. We considered the artificial stars to be recovered if the PSF to CModel flux ratio of the detected source was within of unity at the input magnitude. The completeness was examined in elliptical annuli centered on NGC 253, assuming an axis ratio which is judged by eye to be a good match to the shape of the outer halo. At the radial distances of relevance for this paper (30-110 arcmin), the recovery fraction is almost constant for a given input magnitude. We interpolated the recovery fractions to produce a 2D histogram representing the completeness fraction as function of magnitude and color, and used this to correct for incompleteness where required.
3 Properties of NGC253-SNFC-dw1
3.1 Star Counts and Stellar Populations
The right panel of Figure 1 shows the spatial distribution of RGB stars across three HSC pointings around NGC 253. RGB stars are selected from stellar objects within the black solid polygon on the color-magnitude diagram (CMD) shown in Figure 2(a), the boundaries of which have been chosen to optimize the selection of RGB stars at the distance of NGC 253, while limiting the number of foreground and background contaminants. The color of each point in the map denotes the color of the star, which can be interpreted as a rough proxy for metallicity. We linearly convert the color and magnitude of each star to the index (0 to 1) and assign the color (dark blue to orange). The bluest (index) and reddest (index) colors correspond to and , respectively, assuming 10 Gyr old age (Bressan et al., 2012). The map reveals a very extended and asymmetric metal-rich stellar halo that completely fills the central HSC pointing ( kpc) and which will be the subject of a future paper.
The map also reveals two very prominent metal-poor substructures at the edges of the current SNFC survey coverage. While the northern feature is the satellite galaxy, MM-Dw2, discovered independently by Toloba et al. (2016) and Romanowsky et al. (2016), the southern over-density, which we call SNFC-dw1, is new. Another known satellite, Scl-MM-dw1, is located near SNFC-dw1, but it is hardly visible on the map due to its compactness () (Sand et al., 2014). To investigate the properties of SNFC-dw1, we first set the center by eye and isolate a surrounding circular region of 9 arcmin radius, as shown by the black solid circle. We also select a reference field of identical area at the same elliptical radius from NGC 253’s center as SNFC-dw1, shown by the black dashed circle.
The lower-middle panel of Figure 1 presents the zoom-in view around SNFC-dw1. It shows the smoothed density map of metal-poor RGB stars within the leftward of the dashed line in the polygonal region in Figure 2(b). The kernel density is estimated with the bandwidth of 1.′0, which is kpc at the distance of NGC 253. There are two areas affected by narrow diffraction spikes from saturated foreground stars where the pipeline failed to return reliable photometry. To reduce any spurious effects, we masked these regions, shown with gray shading, and re-populated them with stars drawn from the adjacent area before estimating SNFC-dw1’s properties. The density map shows the flattened core of SNFC-dw1 with a surrounding asymmetrical extension. Specifically, the stellar density rapidly decreases on the southern side, while on the northern side two elongated tidal extensions can be seen that point towards NGC 253, indicated by the white arrow in the panel. This morphology indicates that SNFC-dw1 is highly-disrupted and that we are likely viewing it at apocenter, with both the leading and trailing tails projecting on the same side of its main body.
Figure 2 shows the de-reddened Hess diagrams of stellar sources around NGC 253, SNFC-dw1, the reference field, and the field-subtracted SNFC-dw1. The error bars in panels (a) to (c) show the median photometric error of stars in the interval . The 50 percent completeness threshold is shown as the dotted line. Panel (a) contains stars within an elliptical annulus of r of NGC 253, adopting the (de Vaucouleurs et al., 1991). PARSEC isochrones of age 10 Gyr and (Bressan et al., 2012) are shifted to NGC 253’s distance and overlaid as solid lines. A well-populated broad RGB is seen (, ) that spans the full range of isochrones shown. Another obvious feature is the blue plume at , which we identify with unresolved high-z galaxies as seen in other wide-field surveys of nearby galaxies (e.g. Barker et al., 2012; Okamoto et al., 2019) as well as in the reference field (Figure 2(c)). Comparing Figure 2(b) that shows stars within a circular radius of 9 arcmin centered on SNFC-dw1 with Figure 2(c) that shows the equal area reference field, the signature of a metal-poor RGB sequence is striking. This feature is well-matched to a theoretical isochrone of and 10 Gyr old. A tantalising feature in panel (b) is the plume of stars that sits above the RGB selection box that we tentatively associate with a thermally-pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) population. We select these stars using the orange solid parallelogram in panel (b), and plot their spatial distribution as the black points in the lower-middle panel of Figure 1. These sources are indeed visually clustered on the main body of SNFC-dw1 as would be expected for an instrinsic population. The field-subtracted Hess diagram in Figure 2(d) confirms the clear RGB overdensity as well as the existence of TP-AGB stars in the SNFC-dw1 field.
3.2 Distance
We derive the distance to SNFC-dw1 using the TRGB method (e.g. Lee et al., 1993), following the procedure described in Okamoto et al. (2019). Stars of that lie within 9 arcmin radius are used to derive the -band luminosity function (LF). Using the LF of point sources in the reference field, we correct for contamination from the NGC 253 halo population and from foreground/background objects. Then, we apply a Sobel filter to detect a sharp transition at . We estimate the TRGB color as and apply equation (1) of Okamoto et al. (2019) to calculate as . Therefore, the distance modulus to SNFC-dw1 is , corresponding to D Mpc. To be able to directly compare, we also estimate the TRGB distance of NGC 253 using our dataset. In this case, we use stars lying in the elliptical annulus covering and correct for contamination of foreground/background objects using the same reference field but scaled up to cover the same area within the elliptical annulus. We find , or D Mpc, which is in excellent agreement with Radburn-Smith et al. (2011). This places SNFC-dw1 at a 3D radius of kpc on the far side of NGC 253.
3.3 Luminosity, Structure and Metallicity
The total luminosity and color of SNFC-dw1 are estimated using the flux of metal-poor RGB stars within the solid circle of the right panel in Figure 1. The photometric completeness of a given star is inferred from comparing its magnitude and color with the interpolated completeness curve. The flux is then scaled to account for stars fainter than the RGB selection box using the best-fit theoretical isochrone. The contaminant contribution is calculated by applying the same approach to the reference field, and then subtracted. We find and , which corresponds to using the transformations in Komiyama et al. (2018). Adopting equation (8) of Taylor et al. (2011), we calculate the stellar mass of SNFC-dw1 to be .
Figure 3 shows the metallicity distribution function (MDF) of SNFC-dw1 derived from the completeness-corrected color distribution of bright RGB stars. We use RGB stars of to reduce the uncertainties and to keep the wide spacing between isochrones in the color. RGB stars are selected within the solid circle of the right panel of Figure 1 and within the solid polygon of Figure 2. The metallicity is derived from the linear interpolation of isochrones of to with a fixed age of 10 Gyr and extrapolation with the spline function up to in the same manner as done in Okamoto et al. (2023). The completeness is corrected as before according to the color and magnitude of each star. The same estimation is done for the reference field in order to derive the contaminant contribution to the MDF arising from the NGC 253 halo and background/foreground objects. The contaminant-corrected MDF is shown as the shaded histogram. The uncertainty is estimated by performing a Monte Carlo simulation with N for each RGB star. A star is randomly re-sampled from a Gaussian distribution with a width equal to the photometric error, and the metallicity is redetermined. The standard deviation of the resulting metallicity distribution is adopted as the uncertainty for each RGB star. The estimated uncertainties increase from 0.03 to 0.14 dex with decreasing metallicity from to due to the narrow range in RGB color between metal-poor isochrones. The weighted mean metallicity corrected for this effect is shown as the error-weighted mean value dex. The overall appearance of the MDF is well-described by a single Gaussian shown as the solid line in Figure 3. The sudden drop on the metal-rich side () of the MDF likely reflects an over-subtraction due to small number statistics in this metallicity range, in which the NGC 253 halo dominates the contaminant signal.
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
R.A.(J2000) | |
Dec. (J2000) | |
Distance | Mpc |
P.A. | 104.8 |
0.06 | |
kpc | |
dex | |
dex | |
mag arcsec | |
Note. — (a) Position angle from north to east. (b) Ellipticity where is the axis ratio. (c) Measured using stars within a circular radius of 9 arcmin at the SNFC-dw1. (d) Sérsic index. (e) Half-light radius of the Sérsic profile. (f) Average surface brightness within the half-light radius in g-band. (g) The stellar mass calculated using the inferred total magnitude.
Although the extended regions of SNFC-dw1 are very irregular, the core structure seen in the lower-middle panel of Figure 1 is well-defined and so we proceed to estimate its structural properties. We compute the values using the density-weighted zeroth, first and second moments of the metal-poor RGB spatial distribution and list them in Table 1. The estimated shape shown as a dashed line in Figure 1 seems to be more circular than the visual impression of the density map, probably due to the existence of extended components toward the north. We also fit the standard Sérsic profile via least-squares minimization to the completeness-corrected metal-poor RGB star counts. The radial profile is constructed by calculating the average number density of RGB stars in a series of elliptical annuli, defined using the derived structural parameters. We take the Poisson uncertainties in the RGB counts as the uncertainty. Initially, the contaminant contribution is visually estimated as the average number density at large radius () and we fit the profile and estimate the half-light radius (). We then iterate on the estimation of the contaminant level, this time using the average number density between 4 and . Finally, the profile is refit with this contamination level. The resulting kpc is very large for a dwarf galaxy and, in combination with the relatively low luminosity, yields an extremely faint average surface brightness of mag arcsec within .
4 Discussion and Summary
Using data from the SNFC survey being conducted with the Subaru Telescope, we have uncovered a new dwarf satellite of the nearby spiral NGC 253. The system lies at a projected separation of 83.4 kpc from the center of NGC 253. We have used the TRGB method to derive consistent distances to SNFC-dw1 and NGC 253, finding them to lie at Mpc and Mpc, respectively. This places SNFC-dw1 at a 3D radius of 146 kpc on the far side of the NGC 253 halo and well within its estimated virial radius of 330 kpc (Mutlu-Pakdil et al., 2021), confirming it is a bound satellite.
We find SNFC-dw1 to be dominated by an old metal-poor population; additionally, there is tentative evidence for an associated TP-AGB population. As such stars have ages of typically Gyr (Marigo et al., 2017), their presence suggests that the system was star-forming until relatively recently. Although SNFC-dw1 has a comparable luminosity, stellar mass and metallicity to bright classical Galactic dSphs, it is extremely diffuse ( mag arcsec) – a direct consequence of its abnormally large size with kpc. Indeed, star counts can be traced over more than 10 kpc and reveal a very asymmetric structure in the peripheral regions. Notably, SNFC-dw1 has a size comparable to some of the most diffuse galaxies currently known, including the puzzling Local Group systems Crater 2 ( kpc), Antlia 2 ( kpc) and Andromeda XIX ( kpc) (Torrealba et al., 2016; Ji et al., 2021; Savino et al., 2022).
Figure 4 compares SNFC-dw1 to other dwarf galaxies in terms of scaling relationships. These plots include LG dSphs (McConnachie, 2012, updated in January 2021), Ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) in the Coma Cluster (van Dokkum et al., 2015), some of the known NGC 253 satellites (Toloba et al., 2016; Martínez-Delgado et al., 2021; Mutlu-Pakdil et al., 2022) and the particularly diffuse dSphs (open squares) Antlia 2 (Torrealba et al., 2019; Ji et al., 2021; Vivas et al., 2022), Andromeda XIX (Collins et al., 2020), the M81 satellite F8D1 (Žemaitis et al., 2023), the Centauras A satellite CenA-MM-dw1 (Crnojević et al., 2019), and the recently-discovered NGC 55-dw1 (McNanna et al., 2024). The upper panel of Figure 4 shows the systems on the size-luminosity plane. Only six systems have a similarly large size ( kpc) to SNFC-dw1 – Andromeda XIX and Antlia 2 and NGC 55-dw1, which are magnitudes fainter, and the Sagittarius (Sgr) dSph, CenA-MM-dw3 and F8D1, which are magnitudes brighter. While both Sgr, CenA-MM-dw3 and F8D1 show direct evidence for tidal disruption (Crnojević et al., 2016; Majewski et al., 2003; Žemaitis et al., 2023), the evidence in Antlia 2 and Andromeda XIX has thus far only been circumstantial (e.g. Belokurov et al., 2006; Torrealba et al., 2019; Collins et al., 2020; Ji et al., 2021). The situation is also not clear for NGC 55-dw1 which, in addition to lacking clear tidal features, does not yet have a directly measured distance (McNanna et al., 2024). Amongst the NGC 253 satellites, MM-dw2 is most similar to SNFC-dw1 and it exhibits a highly elongated shape (see Figure 1). However, the properties of MM-dw2 estimated from two independent studies are rather different – and kpc using Magellan/Megacam (Toloba et al., 2016) and and kpc using Subaru/Suprime-Cam (Romanowsky et al., 2016). We plot both values connected with a purple solid line in the upper panel of Figure 4. The prominent tidal extensions emanating from SNFC-dw1 provide unambiguous evidence of tidal disruption, demonstrating that this is a natural pathway to produce such extremely diffuse and extended galaxies. This conclusion is further supported by integrated light analyses of two more distant dwarfs with similarly large sizes – NGC4449B associated with the dwarf starburst galaxy NGC 4449 (Rich et al., 2012; Martínez-Delgado et al., 2012) and HCC-087 in the Hydra I galaxy cluster, (Koch et al., 2012), both of which are also known to exhibit S-shaped tidal features.
The lower panel of Figure 4 shows the luminosity-metallicity scaling relation (LZR) defined by local dwarfs. To place SNFC-dw1 on this plot, we converted the global metallicity to using equation (3) of Salaris et al. (1993) assuming two cases, and 0.32 dex, the latter inferred from recent spectroscopic studies of UDGs (Ferré-Mateu et al., 2023). Broadly speaking, SNFC-dw1 obeys the same LZR as LG dSphs (Kirby et al., 2013). If we assume an -enhanced abundance, it is somewhat more metal-poor than expected for a galaxy of the same luminosity but it still lies within of the relation, suggesting that it has not yet lost a significant fraction of its original stellar mass. Whether or not this finding is at odds with the highly disrupted appearance of SNFC-dw1 is unclear. A measurement of the velocity dispersion would be extremely valuable for constraining the degree of tidal strip** (e.g. Borukhovetskaya et al., 2022) but such observations would be very challenging with current facilities given the faintness of SNFC-dw1’s stars.
It is worth noting that SNFC-dw1 lies in an area of the sky that has been the target of multiple dwarf galaxy searches in recent years, some of which have used integrated light (Martínez-Delgado et al., 2021; Mutlu-Pakdil et al., 2022) while others have used resolved stars (Carlsten et al., 2022). Although it is the second most luminous of the six satellites projected within 150 kpc of NGC 253 (Mutlu-Pakdil et al., 2024), and comparable to the brightest classical dSph of the Milky Way and Andromeda, SNFC-dw1 has remained unearthed until now due to its extremely diffuse nature. This emphasizes the importance of surface brightness limiting depth in satellite searches, suggesting that even bright-end incompleteness can be an issue at the typical depths of most present-day studies. Fortunately, with the recent launch of ESA’s Euclid satellite, the start of the Legacy Survey of Space and Time with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory in 2025 and the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope launch in 2027, the era of very sensitive ( mag arcsec) satellite searches around large numbers of Local Volume galaxies will soon be upon us.
References
- Axelrod et al. (2010) Axelrod, T., Kantor, J., Lupton, R. H., & Pierfederici, F. 2010, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7740, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy, 774015, doi: 10.1117/12.857297
- Bailin et al. (2011) Bailin, J., Bell, E. F., Chappell, S. N., Radburn-Smith, D. J., & de Jong, R. S. 2011, ApJ, 736, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/24
- Barker et al. (2012) Barker, M. K., Ferguson, A. M. N., Irwin, M. J., Arimoto, N., & Jablonka, P. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1489, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19814.x
- Beck et al. (1982) Beck, R., Hutschenreiter, G., & Wielebinski, R. 1982, A&A, 106, 112
- Belokurov et al. (2006) Belokurov, V., Zucker, D. B., Evans, N. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, L137, doi: 10.1086/504797
- Bonnarel et al. (2000) Bonnarel, F., Fernique, P., Bienaymé, O., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 33, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000331
- Borukhovetskaya et al. (2022) Borukhovetskaya, A., Navarro, J. F., Errani, R., & Fattahi, A. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 5247, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac653
- Bosch et al. (2018) Bosch, J., Armstrong, R., Bickerton, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S5, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx080
- Bressan et al. (2012) Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x
- Bullock & Boylan-Kolchin (2017) Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 343, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313
- Bullock & Johnston (2005) Bullock, J. S., & Johnston, K. V. 2005, ApJ, 635, 931, doi: 10.1086/497422
- Cantiello et al. (2018) Cantiello, M., Grado, A., Rejkuba, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 611, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731325
- Carlsten et al. (2022) Carlsten, S. G., Greene, J. E., Beaton, R. L., Danieli, S., & Greco, J. P. 2022, ApJ, 933, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6fd7
- Chambers et al. (2016) Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560
- Chiboucas et al. (2013) Chiboucas, K., Jacobs, B. A., Tully, R. B., & Karachentsev, I. D. 2013, AJ, 146, 126, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/5/126
- Collins et al. (2020) Collins, M. L. M., Tollerud, E. J., Rich, R. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 3496, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3252
- Crnojević et al. (2016) Crnojević, D., Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 19, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/19
- Crnojević et al. (2019) Crnojević, D., Sand, D. J., Bennet, P., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafbe7
- Davidge (2010) Davidge, T. J. 2010, ApJ, 725, 1342, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/1342
- de Vaucouleurs et al. (1991) de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, Herold G., J., et al. 1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies
- Doliva-Dolinsky et al. (2023) Doliva-Dolinsky, A., Martin, N. F., Yuan, Z., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdcf6
- Ferré-Mateu et al. (2023) Ferré-Mateu, A., Gannon, J. S., Forbes, D. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 4735, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3102
- Fitzpatrick (1999) Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63, doi: 10.1086/316293
- Greggio et al. (2014) Greggio, L., Rejkuba, M., Gonzalez, O. A., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322759
- Harmsen et al. (2017) Harmsen, B., Monachesi, A., Bell, E. F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 1491, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2992
- Homma et al. (2019) Homma, D., Chiba, M., Komiyama, Y., et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, 94, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz076
- Ivezić et al. (2019) Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c
- Ji et al. (2021) Ji, A. P., Koposov, S. E., Li, T. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1869
- Jurić et al. (2017) Jurić, M., Kantor, J., Lim, K. T., et al. 2017, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 512, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXV, ed. N. P. F. Lorente, K. Shortridge, & R. Wayth, 279, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1512.07914
- Karachentsev et al. (2013) Karachentsev, I. D., Makarov, D. I., & Kaisina, E. I. 2013, AJ, 145, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/4/101
- Kirby et al. (2013) Kirby, E. N., Cohen, J. G., Guhathakurta, P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/102
- Koch et al. (2012) Koch, A., Burkert, A., Rich, R. M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 755, L13, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/755/1/L13
- Komiyama et al. (2018) Komiyama, Y., Chiba, M., Tanaka, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa129
- Lee et al. (1993) Lee, M. G., Freedman, W. L., & Madore, B. F. 1993, ApJ, 417, 553, doi: 10.1086/173334
- Magnier et al. (2013) Magnier, E. A., Schlafly, E., Finkbeiner, D., et al. 2013, ApJS, 205, 20, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/205/2/20
- Majewski et al. (2003) Majewski, S. R., Skrutskie, M. F., Weinberg, M. D., & Ostheimer, J. C. 2003, ApJ, 599, 1082, doi: 10.1086/379504
- Malin & Hadley (1997) Malin, D., & Hadley, B. 1997, PASA, 14, 52, doi: 10.1071/AS97052
- Marigo et al. (2017) Marigo, P., Girardi, L., Bressan, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/77
- Martínez-Delgado et al. (2012) Martínez-Delgado, D., Romanowsky, A. J., Gabany, R. J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/748/2/L24
- Martínez-Delgado et al. (2021) Martínez-Delgado, D., Makarov, D., Javanmardi, B., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141242
- McConnachie (2012) McConnachie, A. W. 2012, AJ, 144, 4, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4
- McNanna et al. (2024) McNanna, M., Bechtol, K., Mau, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad07d0
- Miyazaki et al. (2018) Miyazaki, S., Komiyama, Y., Kawanomoto, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx063
- Mutlu-Pakdil et al. (2021) Mutlu-Pakdil, B., Sand, D. J., Crnojević, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 918, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0db8
- Mutlu-Pakdil et al. (2022) —. 2022, ApJ, 926, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4418
- Mutlu-Pakdil et al. (2024) —. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.14457, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.14457
- Ogami et al. (2024) Ogami, I., Tanaka, M., Komiyama, Y., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.00668, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.00668
- Okamoto et al. (2019) Okamoto, S., Arimoto, N., Ferguson, A. M. N., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab44a7
- Okamoto et al. (2023) Okamoto, S., Arimoto, N., Ferguson, A. M. N., Irwin, M. J., & Žemaitis, R. 2023, ApJ, 952, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdad1
- Pillepich et al. (2014) Pillepich, A., Vogelsberger, M., Deason, A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 237, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1408
- Pucha et al. (2019) Pucha, R., Carlin, J. L., Willman, B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29fb
- Radburn-Smith et al. (2011) Radburn-Smith, D. J., de Jong, R. S., Seth, A. C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 195, 18, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/18
- Rich et al. (2012) Rich, R. M., Collins, M. L. M., Black, C. M., et al. 2012, Nature, 482, 192, doi: 10.1038/nature10837
- Romanowsky et al. (2016) Romanowsky, A. J., Martínez-Delgado, D., Martin, N. F., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, L103, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv207
- Salaris et al. (1993) Salaris, M., Chieffi, A., & Straniero, O. 1993, ApJ, 414, 580, doi: 10.1086/173105
- Sales et al. (2022) Sales, L. V., Wetzel, A., & Fattahi, A. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 897, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01689-w
- Sand et al. (2014) Sand, D. J., Crnojević, D., Strader, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 793, L7, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/793/1/L7
- Savino et al. (2022) Savino, A., Weisz, D. R., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac91cb
- Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103
- Schlegel et al. (1998) Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772
- Taylor et al. (2011) Taylor, E. N., Hopkins, A. M., Baldry, I. K., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1587, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19536.x
- Toloba et al. (2016) Toloba, E., Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L5
- Torrealba et al. (2016) Torrealba, G., Koposov, S. E., Belokurov, V., & Irwin, M. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 2370, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw733
- Torrealba et al. (2019) Torrealba, G., Belokurov, V., Koposov, S. E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 2743, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1624
- van Dokkum et al. (2015) van Dokkum, P. G., Abraham, R., Merritt, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, L45, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/798/2/L45
- Vivas et al. (2022) Vivas, A. K., Martínez-Vázquez, C. E., Walker, A. R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac43bd
- Žemaitis et al. (2023) Žemaitis, R., Ferguson, A. M. N., Okamoto, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 2497, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3133