Noise sensitivity and stability on groups
Abstract.
We discuss finitely generated infinite groups on which natural random walks are noise sensitive in total variation as well as ones on which natural random walks are noise stable in total variation.
1. Introduction
Let be a countable group and be a probability measure on it. A -random walk starting from the identity is defined by and for an independent, identically distributed sequence with the common law . The distribution of is the -fold convolution . For a real , let
where denotes the product measure and if and otherwise. Let us consider a -random walk starting from the identity on . On the one hand, we say that the -random walk is noise sensitive in total variation if
In the above, the total variation distance coincides with the half of -norm,
where are probability measures on , . On the other hand, we say that the -random walk is noise stable in total variation if
This latter notion is a strong negation of the former. Since we use only total variation distance in the definitions, let us simply say noise sensitive or noise stable respectively if there is no danger of confusion.
If a -random walk on is noise sensitive, then informally speaking, the situation is as in the following: For each fixed even though it is close to , independent refreshes of -portions in the increments produce an asymptotically independent copy of the original -random walk. If a -random walk on is noise stable, then the situation is completely opposite in the following sense: For each fixed even though it is close to , independent refreshes of -portions in the increments only produce a pair which is statistically distinguishable from the pair of two independent -random walks. In this paper, we provide a class of finitely generated infinite groups on which natural random walks exhibit noise sensitive. However, we mention a class of examples on which natural random walks exhibit noise stable only in a rather weak sense, and leave it open to show that they are genuinely noise stable.
The noise sensitivity for random walks on groups was introduced by Benjamini and Brieussel in [BB23, Definition 2.1]. In their paper, they discuss the notion and the variants not only in total variation (there it is called -noise sensitivity) but also in other distances or in terms of entropy. See also a related discussion in [Kal18, Section 3.3.4]. It has been observed that on finite groups random walks are noise sensitive in all natural notions [BB23, Proposition 5.1]. This raises a challenge to find finitely generated infinite groups on which random walks are noise sensitive. Further the problem becomes more restrictive by measuring the distance in total variation. A simple observation on the local central limit theorem shows that standard random walks on finite rank free abelian groups are neither noise sensitive nor noise stable (see Appendix A). Benjamini and Brieussel have shown that on the infinite dihedral group some lazy simple random walk is noise sensitive [ibid. Theorem 1.4]. So far, this has been the only known random walk which is noise sensitive in total variation on a finitely generated infinite group. We provide a class of such groups on which natural random walks are noise sensitive.
Theorem 1.1.
Let be an affine Weyl group, and be a probability measure on such that the support of equals . For all ,
i.e., the -random walk on is noise sensitive in total variation.
Theorem 1.1 is shown in Theorem 2.10. The infinite dihedral group
is a special case of affine Weyl group called type . See more on explicit examples of affine Weyl groups in Section 2.8. In fact, there exist a constant and an integer such that for all large enough integer ,
In Theorem 1.1, the laziness (i.e., ) is crucial since otherwise random walk on that group is not necessarily noise sensitive. This in particular shows that the noise sensitivity is a property of the random walk rather than the group as it has been pointed out in [BB23]. Let us note that the -random walk on the infinite dihedral group considered there has a particular form: . It is not already clear from their proof that changing the laziness (i.e., the measure on the identity element) would still provide a noise sensitive random walk. We show that this is indeed the case, furthermore, is allowed to be a non-uniform distribution on .
Let us discuss the noise stability. The following is known for a finitely supported probability measure : Either if the group admits a surjective homomorphism onto , or if is non-Liouville, i.e., there exists a non-constant bounded -harmonic function on , then a -random walk on is not noise sensitive [BB23, Theorem 1.1]. In a more specific class of (where possibly does or does not admit a surjective homomorphism onto ), a strong negation of noise sensitivity has been shown for non-elementary word hyperbolic groups, e.g., free groups of rank at least . In which case, we say that is non-elementary if the support generates as a group a subgroup which contains an isomorphic copy of free group of rank . If is non-elementary and has a finite first moment, then there exists a such that as for all [Tan22, Theorem 1.3]. In this generality, it has not been known as to whether it holds that . Note that it is rather straightforward to check this for simple random walks on free semi-groups of rank at least , cf. [ibid, Introduction].
Outlines of proofs
Let us discuss the noise sensitivity result in Theorem 1.1. An affine Weyl group with the standard set of generators is associated with some Euclidean space . The group acts on isometrically and generators act as reflections relative to hyperplanes. The has the form where is identified with a lattice in and is a finite group (called a spherical Weyl group). There is a point in such that the orbit map is injective. Taking a conjugate by a translation if necessary, we assume that is the origin in (see Section 2.1 for the precise discussion). A main ingredient is to establish a local central limit theorem (Theorem 2.6). We define a discrete normal distribution on induced from the normalized restriction on of the -dimensional Gaussian density function with a covariance matrix . Further we show the following: The distribution is approximated by uniformly on within an error of order as tends to infinity. The local central limit theorem itself follows from a classical argument based on characteristic functions. Some more general results (other than the Cayley graphs of affine Weyl groups) have been known, e.g., in [KS83], [PS94], [KSS98] and [Sun13]. We provide the proof of the local central limit theorem in our setting with an error estimate. Furthermore, we use an explicit form of matrix in terms of harmonic -forms on a finite quotient graph of the Cayley graph by the lattice . The matrix is obtained as some limiting form, which is known in the literature of symbolic dynamics, however, the explicit form in Theorem 2.6 plays an important role.
We apply this discussion to for . The local central limit theorem enables us to show that there exists a constant such that for all large enough ,
(See Theorem 2.8.) This bound is sharp up to the factor (Remark 2.9). If has the support , then has the support consisting of element of order at most . The explicit formula of the covariance matrix implies that has a block diagonal form and for all . (This is the only part where we use the particular structure of the generating sets.) Thus by the triangle inequality we conclude Theorem 1.1 (in Theorem 2.10). Let us note that if the support of does not contain , then the support of does not generate the group (cf. Section 2.7). Furthermore, there is an example of noise sensitive random walk on the infinite dihedral group not covered by this statement; see Section 2.8.1.
Organization
Notations
For a constant , we write to indicate its dependence on . For non-negative real valued functions and on a common (sub-)set of non-negative integers , we write or if there exists a constant such that for all large enough . Also, if in the above notation. Further we write if there exists a constant such that for all large enough , and if and . For a set , we denote by the cardinality.
2. Noise sensitivity
For a group and for a subset in , we write if is generated by as a semigroup, i.e., every element in is obtained as a product of some finite sequence of elements from . Let be a finitely generated group with a finite symmetric set of generators , i.e., and is invariant under the map . It holds that, in fact, for all if consists of involutions. (This is the case of an (affine) Weyl group in the following discussion.) Let be the (right) Cayley graph of with respect to , i.e., the set of vertices is and an edge is defined if and only if . Since is invariant under , the Cayley graph is defined as an undirected graph. For , let denote the word norm with respect to , i.e., the graph distance between and in .
2.1. Affine Weyl groups
Let be an affine Weyl group where is a canonical finite set of generators, consisting of involutions, i.e., for every . The group admits a semi-direct product structure where the subgroup called the spherical Weyl group is finite and the normal subgroup is isomorphic to a free abelian group of finite rank. For a thorough background on the subject, we refer to [AB08].
The group is equipped with an isometric action on the standard Euclidean space for some , where each generator acts as a reflection with respect to an affine hyperplane. The action is properly discontinuous and admits a relatively compact convex fundamental domain with nonempty interior called a chamber. The group acts on the set of chambers simply transitively, i.e., for all there exists such that , and if , then . The normal subgroup acts freely (i.e., without fixed points) as translations on . The -orbit of the origin is a lattice:
where form a basis in . We identify with the lattice in . Note that the action of preserves .
The affine Weyl group is called reducible if there exist nontrivial affine Weyl groups generated by and respectively with for which , and irreducible otherwise. The group we consider is possibly (and basically) reducible. Irreducible ones are completely classified in terms of root systems. For example, the affine Weyl group of type is the infinite dihedral group
where and act as reflections with respect to (the origin) and respectively in . A chamber has the form of interval .
Let us fix a point in the interior of a chamber and define
The map is injective since acts on the set of chambers simply transitively, and is -equivariant, i.e., for all . Let us call an associated equivariant embedding. Since the generators act as reflections with respect to affine hyperplanes, it is illustrative to consider that is realized in via the map . Namely, the vertices are placed insides of the chambers as the orbit for and an edge is a line segment connecting two vertices for which one is obtained from the other by a reflection of the form for and .
The group itself acts on from left freely as automorphisms of the graph. Let us consider the quotient graph . The graph is finite, the set of vertices is and the set of edges consists of undirected edges. Note, however, that is not the right Cayley graph of with respect to the image of under the quotient map . This is because the quotient map restricted on is not bijective onto . The graph has possibly multiple edges.
2.2. Pointed finite networks as quotients
The main interest is on an affine Weyl group and the canonical set of generators . It is, however, useful to discuss a slightly more general setting. Let be a virtually finite rank free abelian group, i.e., admits a finite rank free abelian group as a finite index subgroup. We assume that acts on an isometrically with a relatively compact fundamental domain with nonempty interior, and that acts as translations and is identified with a lattice in . Let us fix a point in the interior of such a fundamental domain of and define by . The map is equivariant with -actions and injective. For a finite symmetric set of generators in , let
The quotient is a finite (undirected) graph possibly with multiple edges (whence a multi-graph) and with loops. It holds that and
where and are identified.
Let be a probability measure on such that the support of is finite, that , and that is symmetric, i.e., for every . If we define , then is a finite symmetric set of generators, and defines a Markov chain on . Namely, the transition probability is defined by
Note that this Markov chain is irreducible, i.e., it visits every vertex from every other vertex after some time since . Furthermore, it is reversible with respect to the uniform distribution on the set of vertices . Indeed, since is symmetric, it holds that
(2.1) |
where for . Let denote the pushforward under the map , and denote the coset containing . Note that if , then
If , then in fact for every . For each , let us define the conductance by
This is well-defined since by (2.1). Note that for all . Let us call the pointed (finite) network as the finite multi-graph equipped with the conductance and the point (corresponding to the coset containing ).
2.3. Harmonic -forms on finite graphs
Let be the pointed finite network. Henceforth it is convenient to consider as a graph with orientations where each edge (and loop) has both possible orientations. Let
For , we write . The “reversing direction” operation , , defines a bijection and for . For , let us denote by the origin and by the terminus of respectively. We have that for . Let us also consider as a graph with orientations, defining both possible orientations for each edge and loop. Letting and for , we have that and for . It holds that by the definition of conductance,
Let us define the -linear space of complex-valued functions on by
equipped with the inner product , where stands for the complex-conjugate of . Similarly, let be the -linear space of real-valued functions on endowed with the inner product as the restriction of . Further let us define the -linear space of real-valued -forms on by
equipped with the inner product . The differential is the -linear map defined by
Moreover, the adjoint with respect to the inner products is obtained by
It holds that for and ,
(2.2) |
Note that if we define the transition operator on to itself by
then where is the identity operator. Let us define the space of harmonic -forms by
Note that the orthogonal complement of the image by (2.2). The fact that we use in the sequel is that for every -form there exists a unique harmonic -form and some such that
The is obtained as the -part in the orthogonal decomposition . Note that is not unique since every added a constant function satisfies the relation.
Remark 2.1.
If we endow with a structure of -dimensional CW complex, then the -cohomology group with real coefficient is defined as . The fact mentioned above means that every -cohomology class is represented by a unique harmonic -form. Although all these notions are not needed in our discussion, it might be useful to grasp an idea behind some of our computations.
2.4. Perturbations of transfer operators
For each -form , let us define the transfer operator on by
Here . In this particular setting where is symmetric, the transfer operator is self-adjoint on . Hence it has real eigenvalues. Let be the largest eigenvalue of . If , then and this is a simple eigenvalue by the Perron-Frobenius theorem since and is irreducible. We apply to an analytic perturbation in : For a small enough neighborhood of in , the function , is real analytic. Moreover, corresponding eigenvectors depend analytically in with (the constant vector with all ’s). This follows from the implicit function theorem for around in this finite graph setting. Note that if we consider for in place of , then , where for , and thus
This shows that depends only on the harmonic -part of . Let
Since which has a simple eigenvalue , there exists a small enough open neighborhood of in such that is a simple eigenvalue of and is well-defined for all . It holds that since .
Lemma 2.2.
Let and be the eigenvalue and the corresponding eigenvector of such that and for where is a neighborhood of in . For all harmonic -forms on and real parameters for , the following holds:
(2.3) |
(2.4) |
(2.5) |
and
(2.6) |
Proof.
Let be the eigenvector normalized as stated. Since holds for all and is real for all in a small enough neighborhood of in , it holds that . Thus for all and all odd time derivatives of at vanish. This in particular implies (2.3) and (2.6).
For every -form , it holds that for all small enough real and
(2.7) |
Moreover, since is self-adjoint with respect to and , by (2.7) it holds that
(2.8) |
We will also use the analogous identities to (2.7) and (2.8) for the second derivatives of the normalization: for .
First differentiating at yields for each ,
(2.9) |
where we have used . Let us note that (2.9) above yields by (2.3) which we have just shown and by that ,
Since has the simple eigenvalue , this implies that is constant. By (2.7), for every harmonic -from , it holds that for all , showing (2.4).
For all -forms and and for all small enough reals and , it holds that
Taking the second derivatives at of both terms yields by (2.3), (2.4) and that , for each ,
Evaluating the inner products of the above terms with leads
The second terms in the left hand side and in the right hand side respectively are since they are the second derivatives on the normalization (cf. (2.7) and (2.8)). This proves (2.5). ∎
2.5. An explicit Hessian formula in terms of harmonic -forms
Recall that , . Taking a conjugate to the action of by a translation in , we assume that is the origin, whence . The function for (oriented) edges in is invariant under the action by . Indeed, this follows since is identified with a lattice and acts as translations in . Therefore this descends to an -valued function on , which we denote by for . Note that for each . Let be the standard inner product in . For each , let
This defines a -form on . For near , let where is the largest eigenvalue of the transfer operator . Let us define the Hessian of at in with the standard coordinate by
For the pointed finite network and , we compute .
Lemma 2.3.
The Hessian of at in is non-degenerate and negative definite. Moreover, it holds that
(2.10) |
where is defined as the harmonic part of for , .
Proof.
For every , we have for , and is the harmonic part of , i.e., the unique such that for some . Note that the resulting map is -linear. Since depends only on the harmonic part of , Lemma 2.2 (2.5) implies that
This shows (2.10).
Let be a basis of the lattice in : . For each under the identification of with the lattice, there exists a path from to in since the Cayley graph is connected. Let be the image in of that path under the covering map from . Note that the image is a cycle: , for and . Thus and . Furthermore,
The last term equals since . This shows the following: For each there exists a cycle in with and such that
(2.11) |
For , let us assume that . It holds that by (2.10), and thus for every by (2.11). Hence since form a basis of a lattice in . This shows that is non-degenerate. Furthermore is negative definite by (2.10). ∎
Remark 2.4.
Let us consider the Hessian of at on , i.e.,
where defines an -linear map. Lemma 2.2 (2.5) implies that
which shows that is non-degenerate and negative definite on . There exists a natural inclusion , represented by in Lemma 2.3. In this identification, is the restriction of to , and this implies that is non-degenerate and negative definite. A thorough framework is found in [Sun13]. We use the explicit form of later in our discussion.
2.6. Local central limit theorems
For every positive integer , it holds that
(2.12) |
In the above the summation runs over all directed paths starting from in , i.e., and for each . For each such path , there exists a unique path which is a lift of the path, starting from in . By a lift we mean that the path is the image of under the covering map . The definition of the -form on implies the following:
where . Recall that for and in the pointed finite network . By (2.12), it holds that
In the above, the (edge) path is represented as the (vertex) path on , , , , in . Therefore letting
we have the following: For all and all ,
(2.13) |
Let be the dual lattice of , i.e.,
where form the dual basis of in : if and else. The fundamental parallelotope of in is denoted by
The volume of is assumed to be up to a homothety in . The Fourier inversion formula shows that for all ,
(2.14) |
For , let
Lemma 2.5.
If in the pointed finite network , then for all small enough , there exists a constant such that for all ,
Proof.
This uses a standard perturbation argument; we provide a proof for the sake of completeness. For , let where is the associated norm in . Since is self-adjoint, the eigenvalues are real and the operator norm is the spectral radius , i.e., the largest eigenvalue in absolute value. Note that . For , if , then the condition implies that (in which case in fact ). Indeed, for the maximal eigenvalue in absolute value and a corresponding eigenvector , we have . Taking absolute values shows that , implying that is a non-zero constant since is irreducible. Further since is an eigenvector with the eigenvalue in absolute value, and for are on a common circle in the complex plane for each . Since , it holds that for all and for all ,
(2.15) |
If , then for each there exist a and an edge path (as a lift) from to in of length with a given (in particular, even) parity. Applying to (2.15) along the image of the path in successively yields , and thus . This holds for a basis of , implying that . Therefore if , then .
We have shown that for all , and in this finite dimensional setting, is continuous. Thus for a small enough , there exists a constant such that on a compact set . Since
and , by (2.13), we conclude the claim. ∎
For an associated -equivariant embedding , and a non-degenerate positive definite matrix , let
Theorem 2.6 (Local central limit theorem).
Let be a virtually finite rank abelian group acting on isometrically with a relatively compact fundamental domain which contains the origin in the interior. Let be a probability measure on such that the support is finite, and is symmetric. If the corresponding pointed finite network satisfies that , then the following holds: There exist a non-degenerate positive definite matrix and a constant such that
Moreover, the matrix is obtained by
(2.16) |
where is the harmonic part of for for .
Proof.
For all , the Fourier inversion formula (2.14) and the change of variables yield the following: For and for ,
Since in the pointed finite network , Lemma 2.5 shows that for all small enough , there exists a constant such that for all ,
Further by (2.13), up to replacing by a smaller positive value if necessary,
where is an eigenvector of corresponding to . By Lemma 2.3, the Hessian of at on is obtained by . Lemma 2.2 implies that by the Taylor theorem,
Therefore for all and for all ,
Replacing by a smaller positive constant if necessary, we have that for all ,
Since for all , for all large enough ,
In the above, and (where ) are positive constants; we have used the polar coordinate and the positive definiteness of in the second inequality, and that for all large in the third inequality.
Furthermore for all and for all , since ,
where . For the (normalized) eigenvector of for near , since , by Lemma 2.2 (2.4) the Taylor theorem shows the following: For each ,
Note that for ,
Summarizing the above estimates with yields for and for ,
(2.17) |
A direct computation on the Fourier transform yields for all and for all ,
Abusing notations, we have a constant such that for all and uniformly in ,
(2.18) |
Therefore by (2.17) and (2.18), for all and uniformly in ,
Furthermore the explicit form of is obtained by Lemma 2.3, as claimed. ∎
Lemma 2.7.
Let be a probability measure on such that is finite and , and be a -random walk with . There exists a constant such that for all and for all real ,
Proof.
Note that if is a martingale with respect to the filtration associated with , then the proof follows from a concentration inequality. In general, is not a martingale. What we do below is to replace by another -equivariant map which makes the images of form a martingale.
First we claim that there exists a -equivariant harmonic map . This is a map satisfying the following: for all and for all under the identification between and a lattice in , and
This map is obtained from a -equivariant lift of a Dirichlet energy minimizing map from with weights on edges for into the flat torus equipped with metric as a quotient of the standard Euclidean space. The existence of such a map is shown by a simple variational calculus [KS01, Theorem 2.3] (see also [Sun13, Chapter 7]). (In general, is not necessarily injective, but this does not affect the following discussion.) For a -equivariant harmonic map , we have a martingale with respect to the natural filtration.
Next note that the map yields a quasi-isometry between and . In particular, there exist constants such that
(2.19) |
Finally, each component of in the coordinate of is a martingale with a uniformly bounded difference for some . Hence a union bound and the Azuma-Hoeffding inequality show that by (2.19), for all and for all ,
Therefore taking a large enough constant concludes the inequality as claimed. ∎
For the in Theorem 2.6, let us define a discrete normal distribution on by
Theorem 2.8.
In the same setting and assumption as in Theorem 2.6, there exists a constant such that for all large enough integers ,
Proof.
The local central limit theorem (Theorem 2.6) implies that there exists a constant such that for all ,
(2.20) |
For a -random walk with on , Lemma 2.7, there exists a constant such that for all and for all ,
(2.21) |
A direct computation on yields for a (possibly different) constant , for all and for all ,
(2.22) |
Indeed, this follows from an approximation by a Gaussian on for which , and that yields a quasi-isometry between and . Note that for the closure of a relatively compact fundamental domain of . For , , the following holds:
Letting denote the diameter of , we have that by the above inequality, if and , , then and
Thus, for all , ,
Since is positive definite, there exists a constant such that for . Therefore noting that for all , we estimate
for , where is the volume of . By the change of variables , the right hand side equals the following:
where is a constant depending only on and in the polar coordinate. Thus,
where by change of variables. There exists a constant such that for all . Hence there exists a constant such that for all and , the last term is at most
This shows (2.22).
Combining (2.20), (2.21) and (2.22) yields for all and for all ,
In the above . Note that , in particular, for all for a constant independent of since is a -equivariant injective map from into . Letting for a constant , we have for all large enough , and
Fixing a large enough constant such that shows that there exists a constant such that for all large enough ,
(2.23) |
Note that there exists a constant such that for all ,
(2.24) |
Indeed, since is a finite index subgroup of and is a -equivariant embedding with a discrete image in , the Poisson summation formula (cf. (A.1) in Appendix A) on finitely many orbits of shows (2.24). This implies that for all ,
Therefore this together with (2.23), adjusting a constant factor yields the claim. ∎
2.7. Noise sensitivity on affine Weyl groups
Let be an affine Weyl group where is a canonical set of generators consisting of involutions. We have as in Section 2.1. For a probability measure on and for all , we recall that , where denote the product measure and if and otherwise.
For each , the measure is defined on , for which is a generating set of order at most . On the one hand, if , then for all . On the other hand, however, if or (in which case, the support does not contain ), then never generate . Indeed, every affine Weyl group admits a surjective homomorphism onto through the determinant of the isometry part in the natural affine representation. The product group admits a surjective homomorphism onto . If does not contain , then for only generates a proper subgroup of (of index ). Furthermore if , then generates the diagonal subgroup isomorphic to in .
Theorem 2.10.
Let be an affine Weyl group, and be a probability measure on such that the support of equals . For all , the -random walk on starting from the identity satisfies the following: There exist a constant and an integer such that for all large enough integer ,
In particular, for all ,
i.e., the -random walk on is noise sensitive in total variation.
Proof.
Let us apply to and the discussion we have made so far. Fix a point in the interior of a chamber for in the associated Euclidean space . We assume that is the origin after taking a conjugate by a translation for the action of if necessary. Let , , where for and for . For all , the support of is finite, , and is symmetric since every element in has the order at most . Further let equipped with the conductance for induced from . We consider the corresponding pointed finite network where is the identity element in . For all , the corresponding Markov chain on is irreducible and satisfies that , in fact, for every since .
Let be the matrix for in the local central limit theorem (Theorem 2.6), let us show that for all . Namely, in the block diagonal form along the decomposition , we prove the following: For all ,
where is the matrix for in the local central limit theorem. Theorem 2.6 shows that is obtained by
(2.25) |
for and is the harmonic part of the -form for .
First let us show that for all . For each edge , we write for and for . For such , we have that
(2.26) |
Let be the harmonic part of , and be the harmonic part of for each . It holds that
(2.27) |
Indeed, let for . These define harmonic -forms on : This follows since and each marginal of is . Furthermore by the definition of , it holds that for some ,
(2.28) |
Hence by (2.26) and (2.28), letting by for for yields
The uniqueness of harmonic part concludes (2.27).
The right hand side in (2.25) is computed as in the following: By (2.27), it holds that
Note that the summation over is restricted to since for and for each . Furthermore for all . Hence the last term times the factor leads the following:
In the above we have used that and for each in the first equality, and that for all and all in the last equality. Therefore for all , it holds that .
Next since each marginal of is , for ,
The same equality holds for . Summarizing all the above discussion, we obtain for all .
Finally, Theorem 2.8 shows that for all , there exists a constant such that for all large enough , by the triangle inequality,
This concludes the first claim. The second claim follows from the first claim. ∎
2.8. Examples
Let us provide explicit examples of random walks on the affine Weyl groups of type , and . Figures 1, 4 and 5 respectively describe the Cayley graphs of the groups with the corresponding sets of generators (the solid lines with dots). The associated action of each group on consists of reflections with respect to lines (indicated as dotted lines) with a fundamental domain (colored in dark gray). The lattice has a larger fundamental domain (colored in light gray).
2.8.1. Type
Let us consider the infinite dihedral group:
Let . The pair is the affine Weyl group of type , and the product group with the standard set of generators is the affine Weyl group of type . The group is isomorphic to . We define in a way that the origin is the barycenter of a fundamental chamber (which is a square of side length ). The lattice is identified with the standard integer lattice (Figure 1).
Let be a probability measure on such that , and be the associated probability measure on for . The measure has the support . The quotient graph is described in Figure 2.
First we consider the case when and are equal, i.e.,
In this case, for , the -forms for are harmonic. A direct computation yields
Next in the case when and are not necessarily equal, the harmonic -forms
are obtained by (possibly non-constant) functions . For , let
The values of the harmonic -form on the two oriented edges from to satisfy the following:
Similar identities hold on the four oriented edges from to , from to , respectively, and on the two oriented edges from to . The values of on the two oriented edges from to , and from to , respectively, are . The harmonic -form is obtained analogously. A direct computation yields
The following example is not covered by Theorem 2.10: Let be the probability measure on defined by
Let . We have but . The associated probability measure for on has the support which does not satisfy the condition in Theorem 2.10. The quotient graph of the corresponding Cayley graph for is described in Figure 3. The matrix is explicitly computed as
The proof of Theorem 2.10 is directly applied to this case and the -random walk on is noise sensitive in total variation.
2.8.2. Type
Let us consider the affine Weyl group of type :
with . The Cayley graph and the group action on is described in Figure 4 (left). The group is isomorphic to where is the symmetric group on the set . The quotient graph is described in Figure 4 (right).
Let us consider such that the origin is the barycenter of a fundamental chamber (which is an equilateral triangle of side length ). A fundamental domain for the -action is a hexagon of unit area. For a probability measure on such that
the matrix for in the local central limit theorem (Theorem 2.6) is computed as
2.8.3. Type
Let us consider the affine Weyl group of type :
with . The Cayley graph and the group action on is described in Figure 5 (left). The group is isomorphic to where is the signed permutations on the set . The quotient graph of the Cayley graph with the set of generators by the lattice is described in Figure 5 (right).
Let us consider such that the origin is the barycenter of a square of side length (where a fundamental chamber is an isosceles right triangle of equal side length ). A fundamental domain for the -action has unit area. For a probability measure on such that
the matrix for in the local central limit theorem (Theorem 2.6) is computed as
Appendix A Noise sensitivity problem on
Theorem A.1.
Let be a positive integer and be a probability measure on . If has a finite second moment and the support generates the group as a semigroup, then
Let be a non-degenerate positive definite (covariance) matrix of size and
Let us define the function for . Note that since is -periodic on , it is regarded as a function on . Let
Since is in the Schwartz class on , we have for and
where the right hand side is absolutely convergent. In the case when , the Poisson summation formula is obtained by a direct computation,
Thus there exists a constant such that for all ,
(A.1) |
Let and be covariance matrices of size . First we consider the upper bound part. For every real and for every ,
(A.2) |
The first sum in (A) is estimated as follows: For ,
Since , for with ,
Therefore the first sum in the right hand side of (A) is at most by (A.1), for all and for all , if , then
The second sum in the right hand side of (A) is at most by (A.1), for all ,
Summarizing the above estimates yields for every , there exist constants and such that for all ,
(A.3) |
Next let us consider the lower bound part. Noting that for , we have by squaring both sides and summing over ,
In the following, we assume that is invertible. In that case, by (A.1),
Let us focus on the special case when , and
In this case,
Furthermore, , and
Hence one computes for all small enough ,
Summarizing the above computations and letting yield
(A.4) |
Proof of Theorem A.1.
Noting that is independent of , we assume that has mean zero up to shifting by the mean. Further, we assume that is aperiodic (i.e., for each for all large enough one has ) and the general case is reduced to this case. For , we note that is aperiodic since and have the same support in . Let and denote the covariance matrices of size for and respectively.
First let us show the upper bound in the claim. For all real and integers , by the Chebyshev inequality,
This shows that (recalling that )
(A.5) |
Since is aperiodic for , then the local central limit theorem [LL10, Theorem 2.3.9] shows the following: There exists a sequence such that as , for all and for all ,
(A.6) |
Note that there exists a constant such that for all real and all , the number of with is at most . Therefore it holds that
(A.7) |
Hence by (A.3), (A.5) and (A.7), for every ,
Since as , letting yields
This holds for all , and thus we obtain in the total variation distance
This shows the upper bound in the claim.
Next let us show the lower bound in the claim. The general case reduces to the case when since a projection (whence ) to a coordinate only decreases the total variation distance. Let . For , ,
Thus, if (where denotes the supremum norm) and , , then and
This shows that for such that and , ,
Therefore we obtain
Since is positive definite, there exists a constant such that for all , and
This shows that the last integral is at most by the change of variables ,
In the above, the last equality has used the polar coordinate. There exists a constant such that for all and all . The last term above equals by the change of variables, for ,
Note that for all ,
Hence there exist constants such that for all and all ,
Therefore together with (A.6), there exist (possibly different) constants depending only on such that the following holds: For all and all ,
Thus by (A.4), letting , we obtain
In total variation distance, letting and then yields
In the case when is not aperiodic, then we apply the above discussion to the even times and the odd times respectively for those aperiodic random walks, and obtain the same results. ∎
Acknowledgment
The author is partially supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research JP20K03602.
References
- [AB08] Peter Abramenko and Kenneth S. Brown. Buildings, volume 248 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2008. Theory and applications.
- [BB23] Itai Benjamini and Jérémie Brieussel. Noise sensitivity of random walks on groups. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat., 20(2):1139–1164, 2023.
- [Kal18] Gil Kalai. Three puzzles on mathematics, computation, and games. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Rio de Janeiro 2018. Vol. I. Plenary lectures, pages 551–606. World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2018.
- [KS83] András Krámli and Domokos Szász. Random walks with internal degrees of freedom. I. Local limit theorems. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete, 63(1):85–95, 1983.
- [KS01] Motoko Kotani and Toshikazu Sunada. Standard realizations of crystal lattices via harmonic maps. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 353(1):1–20, 2001.
- [KSS98] Motoko Kotani, Tomoyuki Shirai, and Toshikazu Sunada. Asymptotic behavior of the transition probability of a random walk on an infinite graph. J. Funct. Anal., 159(2):664–689, 1998.
- [LL10] Gregory F. Lawler and Vlada Limic. Random Walk: A Modern Introduction. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
- [PS94] Mark Pollicott and Richard Sharp. Rates of recurrence for and extensions of subshifts of finite type. J. London Math. Soc. (2), 49(2):401–416, 1994.
- [Sun13] Toshikazu Sunada. Topological Crystallography: With a View Towards Discrete Geometric Analysis, volume 6 of Surveys and Tutorials in the Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, Tokyo, 2013.
- [Tan22] Ryokichi Tanaka. Non-noise sensitivity for word hyperbolic groups. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math., to appear., arXiv:2211.03951, 2022.