EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN)
âââ CERN-EP-2024-033 LHCb-PAPER-2023-026 June 19, 2024
Modification of and production in Pb collisions at
LHCb collaborationâ â â Authors are listed at the end of this paper.
The LHCb collaboration measures production of the exotic hadron in proton-nucleus collisions for the first time. Comparison with the charmonium state suggests that the exotic experiences different dynamics in the nuclear medium than conventional hadrons, and comparison with data from proton-proton collisions indicates that the presence of the nucleus may modify production rates. This is the first measurement of the nuclear modification factor of an exotic hadron.
Published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 242301
Š 2024 CERN for the benefit of the LHCb collaboration. CC BY 4.0 licence.
Â
The study of exotic hadrons with more than three valence quarks is a highly active area of quantum chromodynamics. Dozens of exotic states have been discovered in the last 20 years, and various models such as compact tetraquarks, hadronic molecules, hadrocharmonia, and other structures have been proposed in attempts to explain their various properties (see reviews in Refs. [1, 2, 3, 4]). However, to date, there is no general consensus on the nature of the first discovered and most well-studied exotic hadron, the state.
Most existing measurements of the properties of exotic hadrons containing charm quarks utilize their production in the decays of hadrons containing quarks. These decays provide well-defined initial conditions, and many sources of background can be efficiently rejected using the relatively long lifetime of hadrons. The LHCb experiment has used these data samples to obtain precise measurements of properties such as its quantum numbers, mass, and width [5, 6, 7, 8], and to explore new production channels and decays [9, 10, 11, 12]. However, exotic hadrons can also be produced promptly at the interaction point of hadronic collisions, where they can interact with other particles produced in the event. In collisions using beams of nuclei, exotic hadrons can also interact with the nuclear remnant and may be subject to the effects of quark-gluon plasma. The response of the exotic hadrons to these effects provides new ways to constrain their properties, which are not accessible when studying -hadron decays.
Previous measurements by the LHCb collaboration in collisions showed a significant decrease in the ratio of prompt to cross-sections, , with increasing charged-particle multiplicity [13]. These data were interpreted in terms of breakup of the hadrons due to interactions with comoving particles produced in the event, for both compact and molecular models of structure [14, 15]. The CMS collaboration has measured the ratio in PbPb collisions, and found that the ratio is enhanced relative to collisions, although that measurement has large uncertainties [16]. Statistical hadronization models predict that production is significantly enhanced in PbPb collisions at the LHC [17, 18]. Calculations based on quark coalescence, which can occur when quark wavefunctions overlap in position and velocity space, show that production rates of hadrons in nucleus-nucleus (AA) collisions are sensitive to its structure. In these models, production of compact tetraquarks is expected to be greatly enhanced over hadronic molecules [19, 20], although a recent transport calculation reaches the opposite conclusion [21]. Late-stage interactions in the hadron gas phase of a heavy-ion collision can also affect the observed yields [22]. The suppressing effects of breakup and the enhancing effects of coalescence are expected to dominate in different multiplicity regimes [23], and it is currently unknown where the crossover may occur.
Collisions of protons with Pb nuclei provide an intermediate stage between the relatively small collision system and the large PbPb system, and can thereby shed light on the interplay of various enhancement and suppression mechanisms. Calculations of tetraquark production in Pb collisions have predicted that the cross-section could be enhanced relative to collisions, due to a higher rate of double-parton scattering [24]. An increase of double-parton scattering in Pb collisions relative to collisions has since been measured by the LHCb collaboration [25]. An enhancement of proton production relative to pions and kaons has been observed in Au and Pb collisions [26, 27, 28], which can be explained by coalescence of three quarks into baryons versus two quarks into mesons [29, 30, 31]. Similarly, an enhancement of charmed baryons relative to charmed mesons has been observed in and Pb collisions, relative to expectations from collisions [32, 33], which may be explained by quark coalescence. These coalescence effects could be even more pronounced for four-quark states, which have not previously been measured in A collisions. Therefore, in addition to providing novel information on the structure, measurements in Pb collisions can provide new tests of models of particle transport and hadronization in nuclear collisions, in a new range of number of constituent quarks.
This Letter describes the first measurements of the prompt production of the exotic state in Pb collisions, including the ratio of to cross-sections and the nuclear modification factor . The and hadrons are reconstructed through their decays to , where the particle subsequently decays to a pair of oppositely charged muons. These measurements use and Pb collision data recorded by the LHCb experiment. The data were collected in 2012 at a center-of-mass energy , corresponding to an integrated luminosity of about 2 fb-1. The Pb data were collected in 2016 in two configurations. In the forward configuration, denoted Pb, the proton beam is directed into the LHCb spectrometer and measurements cover the rapidity interval , where is measured in the center-of-mass frame of the proton-nucleus system. In the backward configuration, denoted Pb, the Pb beam travels into the spectrometer and the resulting rapidity coverage is . The Pb and Pb data sets considered here were recorded at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair , and correspond to integrated luminosities of about 12.5 and 19.3 nb-1, respectively.
The LHCb detector is a single-arm forward spectrometer, described in detail in Refs. [34, 35]. Events considered in this analysis are selected with a series of triggers which retain events containing the decay . The offline selection requires muon candidates to have total momentum and transverse momentum , and to penetrate hadron absorbers in the muon system. Candidate mesons are formed from pairs of oppositely charged muon candidates that have an invariant mass within three standard deviations () of the mean of the peak. Charged pion candidates are required to have and , and are identified by the response of the ring-imaging Cherenkov detectors. Combinations of candidates that form a good quality common vertex are retained, and the tracks are refit with kinematic constraints that require all four tracks to originate from a common vertex and constrain the invariant mass to the known mass [36]. The difference between the mass and the sum of the and masses is required to be less than , which reduces combinatorial backgrounds while retaining signal. The resulting candidates are required to have .
The and signals of interest are produced promptly at the collision vertex, where they are subject to interactions with other particles in the event. The pseudo decay-time is used to select promptly produced signal candidates and reject those produced in decays of hadrons. This variable is defined as
(1) |
where is the difference between the positions of the reconstructed vertex of the candidate and the associated collision vertex along the beam axis, is the mass of the reconstructed signal candidate, and is the candidateâs momentum along the beam axis. A requirement of ps is applied. The data and simulations show that this retains more than of the prompt signals, while rejecting of the signals produced in decays of hadrons. Previous measurements have shown that the fraction of and that are produced promptly in collisions at 8 TeV are about and , respectively, [13], and that hadron production is not significantly modified in Pb collisions [37]. Therefore the requirement produces data samples with a highly enriched prompt component and a negligible contribution from decays. The resulting invariant mass spectra from , Pb, and Pb collisions are shown in Fig. 1.
The mass distributions are fit to extract the ratio of to signal yields. In the fit, the lineshape is represented by a Gaussian function, while the peak is represented by the sum of two Crystal Ball functions, with both low- and high-mass tails [38]. The background is studied by constructing the invariant mass spectrum of combinations using like-sign dipions, and is well represented by a third-order Chebychev polynomial in all data sets. When fitting the Pb and Pb samples, the and lineshapes including the mass are fixed to the values determined by fitting the relatively large sample, while the mass, the signal yields, and the background parameters are allowed to float.
The signal yields with their statistical uncertainties are determined to be and for the Pb and Pb data sets, respectively. The corresponding yields are and for the Pb and Pb data sets. Fit projections are shown overlaid on the data in Fig. 1. The statistical significance of the signal is estimated by calculating where and are the likelihoods under the background-only and signal-plus-background hypotheses [39]. The resulting signal significance is for the Pb data and for the Pb data. A systematic uncertainty on the fitting procedure is evaluated by changing the fit function to a relativistic BreitâWigner convolved with a resolution function or a sum of two Crystal Ball functions, and allowing the mass to float. The resulting variation in the ratio of to signal yields is taken as a systematic uncertainty, which is for the Pb data and 27 for the Pb data.
Simulation is required to model the effects of the detector acceptance and the imposed selection requirements. In the simulation, and particles are generated using Pythia [40] with a specific LHCb configuration [41], and embedded into the EPOS generator [42], which simulates the environment produced in Pb collisions. Decays of unstable particles are described by EvtGen [43]. The interaction of the generated particles with the detector, and its response, are implemented using the Geant4 toolkit [44] as described in Ref. [46]. The distributions of the simulated and decays are weighted to match distributions extracted from the data using the sPlot method [47] and the results of the fits in Fig. 1.
The ratio of cross-sections times their branching fractions to is given by
(2) | ||||
where is the ratio of signal yields returned by the fit, and the efficiency ratios are discussed below.
The ratio of LHCbâs geometric acceptance for the daughter products is determined from simulation to be close to unity with a systematic uncertainty of 1, due to the uncertainty on the weights applied to the simulation to match the data. The ratio of trigger efficiencies is determined from data to be consistent with unity within an uncertainty of , using techniques described in Ref. [48], where the uncertainty comes from statistical uncertainties on the data sample. The ratio of reconstruction efficiencies is determined to be () for the Pb (Pb) data samples, where the uncertainty is due to the statistical uncertainty on the distributions of signals extracted from the data. The deviation of this term from unity is due to the difference in the kinematics of and decays. The dipions from decays have masses between and 600, while the dipions from decays are dominated by intermediate and states with higher mass and are reconstructed with a higher efficiency [11]. The ratios of muon and pion particle identification efficiencies, and , are determined using calibration samples of identified particles from the data to be consistent with unity, with uncertainties of 1 due to the finite size of those samples [49].
The resulting ratios of fiducial cross-sections times branching fractions are and in the Pb and Pb data samples, respectively, where the first and second uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. These ratios are shown in Fig. 2, along with the ratio obtained from multiplicity-integrated LHCb data from collisions [13], which has a value of . CMS data from PbPb collisions is also included [16], which is measured over the rapidity interval and in a significantly higher range than in the LHCb measurements. In this ratio, some effects that modify charm production in nuclear collisions, such as modification of the nuclear parton distribution function, largely cancel, leaving final-state effects as the dominant modification mechanism. There is an increase in the ratio as the system size increases, which may be due to a combination of effects. It has been observed that production is suppressed in A collisions [50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57], which would drive the ratio upwards even if no final-state effects modify production. However, given that collisions show a decreasing trend with multiplicity [13], the increase of the ratio may indicate that the hadronic densities achieved in the Pb and Pb configurations allow quark coalescence to become the dominant mechanism affecting production.
This ambiguity between suppression versus enhancement can be clarified by calculating the nuclear modification factor . This factor is defined as the cross-section measured in Pb collisions divided by the cross-section measured in collisions scaled by the number of nucleons in the nuclear beam, which is 208 for the Pb nuclei used in the LHC. In this case, the ratios of cross-sections from and Pb collisions shown in Fig. 2, along with the nuclear modification factor of (measured with relatively high precision in the dimuon channel in Ref. [57]), can be used to find the nuclear modification factor via the equation
(3) |
The resulting nuclear modification factors are in Pb and in Pb, where the first and second uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. These results are shown as a function of rapidity in Fig. 3, along with the measurement from Ref. [57] for comparison. An enhancement of production in Pb collisions as compared to collisions is seen, with significant uncertainties. This could indicate that the enhancing effects of coalescence dominate production over the suppressing effects of breakup in Pb collisions. In the compact tetraquark interpretation of the structure, formation via coalescence could occur when a pair combines with two light quarks. In Pb collisions, the pseudorapidity density of produced charged particles is significantly higher than in collisions [58, 59], providing an increased probability for quarks to overlap in position and velocity space and potentially coalesce.
In summary, the LHCb collaboration has produced the first measurements of production in Pb collisions. The increase of the ratio of cross-sections from to Pb to PbPb collisions may indicate that the exotic hadron experiences different dynamics in the nuclear medium than the conventional charmonium state . The nuclear modification factor shows that production of hadrons in Pb collisions may be enhanced relative to collisions, although significant uncertainties preclude drawing firm conclusions. These first measurements of exotic hadron production in Pb collisions can provide new constraints on the allowed configurations of quarks inside hadrons and on models of parton transport and hadronization in nuclear collisions.
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments for the excellent performance of the LHC. We thank the technical and administrative staff at the LHCb institutes. We acknowledge support from CERN and from the national agencies: CAPES, CNPq, FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil); MOST and NSFC (China); CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG and MPG (Germany); INFN (Italy); NWO (Netherlands); MNiSW and NCN (Poland); MCID/IFA (Romania); MICINN (Spain); SNSF and SER (Switzerland); NASU (Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom); DOE NP and NSF (USA). We acknowledge the computing resources that are provided by CERN, IN2P3 (France), KIT and DESY (Germany), INFN (Italy), SURF (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), GridPP (United Kingdom), CSCS (Switzerland), IFIN-HH (Romania), CBPF (Brazil), and Polish WLCG (Poland). We are indebted to the communities behind the multiple open-source software packages on which we depend. Individual groups or members have received support from ARC and ARDC (Australia); Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS, CAS PIFI, CAS CCEPP, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and Sci. & Tech. Program of Guangzhou (China); Minciencias (Colombia); EPLANET, Marie SkĹodowska-Curie Actions, ERC and NextGenerationEU (European Union); A*MIDEX, ANR, IPhU and Labex P2IO, and RĂŠgion Auvergne-RhĂ´ne-Alpes (France); AvH Foundation (Germany); ICSC (Italy); GVA, XuntaGal, GENCAT, Inditex, InTalent and Prog. AtracciĂłn Talento, CM (Spain); SRC (Sweden); the Leverhulme Trust, the Royal Society and UKRI (United Kingdom).
References
- [1] S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 015003, arXiv:1708.04012
- [2] F.-K. Guo et al., Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 015004, Erratum ibid. 94 (2022) 029901, arXiv:1705.00141
- [3] H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639 (2016) 1, arXiv:1601.02092
- [4] R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Heavy-quark QCD exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93 (2017) 143, arXiv:1610.04528
- [5] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Determination of the meson quantum numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 222001, arXiv:1302.6269
- [6] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Quantum numbers of the state and orbital angular momentum in its decays, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 011102(R), arXiv:1504.06339
- [7] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Study of the line shape of the state, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 092005, arXiv:2005.13419
- [8] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Study of the and states in decays, JHEP 08 (2020) 123, arXiv:2005.13422
- [9] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Evidence for the decay , Nucl. Phys. B886 (2014) 665, arXiv:1404.0275
- [10] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Observation of the decay, JHEP 09 (2019) 028, arXiv:1907.00954
- [11] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Observation of sizeable contribution to decays, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) L011103, arXiv:2204.12597
- [12] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Observation of the decay, JHEP 07 (2023) 084, arXiv:2302.10629
- [13] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Observation of multiplicity-dependent and production in collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 092001, arXiv:2009.06619
- [14] A. Esposito et al., The nature of X(3872) from high-multiplicity collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 669, arXiv:2006.15044
- [15] E. Braaten, L.-P. He, K. Ingles, and J. Jiang, Production of at high multiplicity, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) L071901, arXiv:2012.13499
- [16] CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Evidence for in Pb-Pb collisions and studies of its prompt production at , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 032001, arXiv:2102.13048
- [17] S. Cho and S. H. Lee, Production of multicharmed hadrons by recombination in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C101 (2020) 024902, arXiv:1907.12786
- [18] A. Andronic et al., Transverse momentum distributions of charmonium states with the statistical hadronization model, Phys. Lett. B797 (2019) 134836, arXiv:1901.09200
- [19] ExHIC collaboration, S. Cho et al., Multi-quark hadrons from heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 212001, arXiv:1011.0852
- [20] ExHIC collaboration, S. Cho et al., Studying exotic hadrons in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C84 (2011) 064910, arXiv:1107.1302
- [21] B. Wu, X. Du, M. Sibila, and R. Rapp, transport in heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. A57 (2021) 122, Erratum ibid. A57 (2021) 314, arXiv:2006.09945
- [22] L. M. Abreu et al., production and absorption in a hot hadron gas, Phys. Lett. B761 (2016) 303, arXiv:1604.07716
- [23] Y. Guo et al., Medium-assisted enhancement of production from small to large colliding systems, arXiv:2302.03828
- [24] F. Carvalho and F. S. Navarra, Nuclear effects on tetraquark production by double parton scattering, EPJ Web Conf. 137 (2017) 06004
- [25] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Observation of enhanced double parton scattering in proton-lead collisions at TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 212001, arXiv:2007.06945
- [26] STAR collaboration, J. Adams et al., Pion, kaon, proton and anti-proton transverse momentum distributions from and Au collisions at 200âGeV, Phys. Lett. B616 (2005) 8, arXiv:nucl-ex/0309012
- [27] PHENIX collaboration, A. Adare et al., Spectra and ratios of identified particles in Au+Au and +Au collisions at 200âGeV, Phys. Rev. C88 (2013) 024906, arXiv:1304.3410
- [28] ALICE collaboration, J. Adam et al., Multiplicity dependence of charged pion, kaon, and (anti)proton production at large transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at 5.02âTeV, Phys. Lett. B760 (2016) 720, arXiv:1601.03658
- [29] R. C. Hwa and C. B. Yang, Final state interaction as the origin of the Cronin effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 082302, arXiv:nucl-th/0403001
- [30] R. C. Hwa and C. B. Yang, Proton production in +Au collisions and the Cronin effect, Phys. Rev. C70 (2004) 037901, arXiv:nucl-th/0404066
- [31] F.-l. Shao et al., Yield ratios of identified hadrons in p+p, p+Pb, and Pb+Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C95 (2017) 064911, arXiv:1703.05862
- [32] ALICE collaboration, S. Acharya et al., Charm-quark fragmentation fractions and production cross section at midrapidity in pp collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) L011103, arXiv:2105.06335
- [33] ALICE collaboration, S. Acharya et al., production and baryon-to-meson ratios in pp and p-Pb Collisions at =5.02ââTeV at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 202301, arXiv:2011.06078
- [34] LHCb collaboration, A. A. Alves Jr. et al., The LHCb detector at the LHC, JINST 3 (2008) S08005
- [35] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., LHCb detector performance, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30 (2015) 1530022, arXiv:1412.6352
- [36] Particle Data Group, R. L. Workman et al., Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01
- [37] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of , and production in Pb collisions at 8.16âTeV, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 052011, arXiv:1902.05599
- [38] J. Gaiser et al., Charmonium spectroscopy from inclusive â and radiative decays, Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 711
- [39] S. S. Wilks, The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses, Ann. Math. Stat. 9 (1938) 60
- [40] T. SjÜstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820
- [41] I. Belyaev et al., Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032047
- [42] T. Pierog et al., EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C92 (2015) 034906, arXiv:1306.0121
- [43] D. J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462 (2001) 152
- [44] Geant4 collaboration, J. Allison et al., Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270
- [45] Geant4 collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al., Geant4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250
- [46] M. Clemencic et al., The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: Design, evolution and experience, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032023
- [47] M. Pivk and F. R. Le Diberder, SPlot: a statistical tool to unfold data distributions, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A555 (2005) 356, arXiv:physics/0402083
- [48] S. Tolk, J. Albrecht, F. Dettori, and A. Pellegrino, Data driven trigger efficiency determination at LHCb, LHCb-PUB-2014-039, 2014
- [49] L. Anderlini et al., The PIDCalib package, LHCb-PUB-2016-021, 2016
- [50] PHENIX collaboration, A. Adare et al., Nuclear modification of , and J/ production in d+Au collisions at = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 202301, arXiv:1305.5516
- [51] ALICE collaboration, B. B. Abelev et al., Suppression of (2S) production in p-Pb collisions at = 5.02 TeV, JHEP 12 (2014) 073, arXiv:1405.3796
- [52] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Study of production cross-sections and cold nuclear matter effects in Pb collisions at 5âTeV, JHEP 03 (2016) 133, arXiv:1601.07878
- [53] PHENIX collaboration, A. Adare et al., Measurement of the relative yields of to mesons produced at forward and backward rapidity in , Al, Au, and 3HeAu collisions at = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C95 (2017) 034904, arXiv:1609.06550
- [54] CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of prompt (2S) production cross sections in proton-lead and proton-proton collisions at 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B790 (2019) 509, arXiv:1805.02248
- [55] ALICE collaboration, S. Acharya et al., Measurement of nuclear effects on production in p-Pb collisions at TeV, JHEP 07 (2020) 237, arXiv:2003.06053
- [56] PHENIX collaboration, U. A. Acharya et al., Measurement of nuclear modification at backward and forward rapidity in , Al, and Au collisions at GeV, Phys. Rev. C105 (2022) 064912, arXiv:2202.03863
- [57] LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Prompt and nonprompt production in Pb collisions at TeV, arXiv:2401.11342, submitted to JHEP
- [58] ALICE collaboration, B. Abelev et al., Pseudorapidity density of charged particles in + Pb collisions at TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 032301, arXiv:1210.3615
- [59] ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Measurement of the centrality dependence of the charged-particle pseudorapidity distribution in protonâlead collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 199, arXiv:1508.00848.
LHCb collaboration
R. Aaij35â,
A.S.W. Abdelmotteleb54â,
C. Abellan Beteta48,
F. AbudinĂŠn54â,
T. Ackernley58â,
B. Adeva44â,
M. Adinolfi52â,
P. Adlarson78â,
C. Agapopoulou46â,
C.A. Aidala79â,
Z. Ajaltouni11,
S. Akar63â,
K. Akiba35â,
P. Albicocco25â,
J. Albrecht17â,
F. Alessio46â,
M. Alexander57â,
A. Alfonso Albero43â,
Z. Aliouche60â,
P. Alvarez Cartelle53â,
R. Amalric15â,
S. Amato3â,
J.L. Amey52â,
Y. Amhis13,46â,
L. An6â,
L. Anderlini24â,
M. Andersson48â,
A. Andreianov41â,
P. Andreola48â,
M. Andreotti23â,
D. Andreou66â,
A. A. Â Anelli28â,
D. Ao7â,
F. Archilli34,tâ,
M. Argenton23â,
S. Arguedas Cuendis9â,
A. Artamonov41â,
M. Artuso66â,
E. Aslanides12â,
M. Atzeni62â,
B. Audurier14â,
D. Bacher61â,
I. Bachiller Perea10â,
S. Bachmann19â,
M. Bachmayer47â,
J.J. Back54â,
A. Bailly-reyre15,
P. Baladron Rodriguez44â,
V. Balagura14â,
W. Baldini23â,
J. Baptista de Souza Leite2â,
M. Barbetti24,kâ,
I. R. Barbosa67â,
R.J. Barlow60â,
S. Barsuk13â,
W. Barter56â,
M. Bartolini53â,
F. Baryshnikov41â,
J.M. Basels16â,
G. Bassi32,qâ,
B. Batsukh5â,
A. Battig17â,
A. Bay47â,
A. Beck54â,
M. Becker17â,
F. Bedeschi32â,
I.B. Bediaga2â,
A. Beiter66,
S. Belin44â,
V. Bellee48â,
K. Belous41â,
I. Belov26â,
I. Belyaev41â,
G. Benane12â,
G. Bencivenni25â,
E. Ben-Haim15â,
A. Berezhnoy41â,
R. Bernet48â,
S. Bernet Andres42â,
H.C. Bernstein66,
C. Bertella60â,
A. Bertolin30â,
C. Betancourt48â,
F. Betti56â,
J. Â Bex53â,
Ia. Bezshyiko48â,
J. Bhom38â,
M.S. Bieker17â,
N.V. Biesuz23â,
P. Billoir15â,
A. Biolchini35â,
M. Birch59â,
F.C.R. Bishop10â,
A. Bitadze60â,
A. Bizzetiâ,
M.P. Blago53â,
T. Blake54â,
F. Blanc47â,
J.E. Blank17â,
S. Blusk66â,
D. Bobulska57â,
V. Bocharnikov41â,
J.A. Boelhauve17â,
O. Boente Garcia14â,
T. Boettcher63â,
A. Â Bohare56â,
A. Boldyrev41â,
C.S. Bolognani76â,
R. Bolzonella23,jâ,
N. Bondar41â,
F. Borgato30,46â,
S. Borghi60â,
M. Borsato28â,
J.T. Borsuk38â,
S.A. Bouchiba47â,
T.J.V. Bowcock58â,
A. Boyer46â,
C. Bozzi23â,
M.J. Bradley59,
S. Braun64â,
A. Brea Rodriguez44â,
N. Breer17â,
J. Brodzicka38â,
A. Brossa Gonzalo44â,
J. Brown58â,
D. Brundu29â,
A. Buonaura48â,
L. Buonincontri30â,
A.T. Burke60â,
C. Burr46â,
A. Bursche69,
A. Butkevich41â,
J.S. Butter53â,
J. Buytaert46â,
W. Byczynski46â,
S. Cadeddu29â,
H. Cai71,
R. Calabrese23,jâ,
L. Calefice17â,
S. Cali25â,
M. Calvi28,nâ,
M. Calvo Gomez42â,
J. Cambon Bouzas44â,
P. Campana25â,
D.H. Campora Perez76â,
A.F. Campoverde Quezada7â,
S. Capelli28,nâ,
L. Capriotti23â,
R. C.  Caravaca Mora9,
A. Carbone22,hâ,
L. Carcedo Salgado44â,
R. Cardinale26,lâ,
A. Cardini29â,
P. Carniti28,nâ,
L. Carus19,
A. Casais Vidal62â,
R. Caspary19â,
G. Casse58â,
J. Castro Godinez9â,
M. Cattaneo46â,
G. Cavallero23â,
V. Cavallini23,jâ,
S. Celani47â,
J. Cerasoli12â,
D. Cervenkov61â,
S. Â Cesare27,mâ,
A.J. Chadwick58â,
I. Chahrour79â,
M. Charles15â,
Ph. Charpentier46â,
C.A. Chavez Barajas58â,
M. Chefdeville10â,
C. Chen12â,
S. Chen5â,
A. Chernov38â,
S. Chernyshenko50â,
V. Chobanova44,xâ,
S. Cholak47â,
M. Chrzaszcz38â,
A. Chubykin41â,
V. Chulikov41â,
P. Ciambrone25â,
M.F. Cicala54â,
X. Cid Vidal44â,
G. Ciezarek46â,
P. Cifra46â,
P.E.L. Clarke56â,
M. Clemencic46â,
H.V. Cliff53â,
J. Closier46â,
J.L. Cobbledick60â,
C. Cocha Toapaxi19â,
V. Coco46â,
J. Cogan12â,
E. Cogneras11â,
L. Cojocariu40â,
P. Collins46â,
T. Colombo46â,
A. Comerma-Montells43â,
L. Congedo21â,
A. Contu29â,
N. Cooke57â,
I. Corredoira 44â,
A. Correia15â,
G. Corti46â,
J.J. Cottee Meldrum52,
B. Couturier46â,
D.C. Craik48â,
M. Cruz Torres2,fâ,
R. Currie56â,
C.L. Da Silva65â,
S. Dadabaev41â,
L. Dai68â,
X. Dai6â,
E. DallâOcco17â,
J. Dalseno44â,
C. DâAmbrosio46â,
J. Daniel11â,
A. Danilina41â,
P. dâArgent21â,
A. Â Davidson54â,
J.E. Davies60â,
A. Davis60â,
O. De Aguiar Francisco60â,
C. De Angelis29,i,
J. de Boer35â,
K. De Bruyn75â,
S. De Capua60â,
M. De Cian19â,
U. De Freitas Carneiro Da Graca2,bâ,
E. De Lucia25â,
J.M. De Miranda2â,
L. De Paula3â,
M. De Serio21,gâ,
D. De Simone48â,
P. De Simone25â,
F. De Vellis17â,
J.A. de Vries76â,
F. Debernardis21,gâ,
D. Decamp10â,
V. Dedu12â,
L. Del Buono15â,
B. Delaney62â,
H.-P. Dembinski17â,
J. Deng8â,
V. Denysenko48â,
O. Deschamps11â,
F. Dettori29,iâ,
B. Dey74â,
P. Di Nezza25â,
I. Diachkov41â,
S. Didenko41â,
S. Ding66â,
V. Dobishuk50â,
A. D. Â Docheva57â,
A. Dolmatov41,
C. Dong4â,
A.M. Donohoe20â,
F. Dordei29â,
A.C. dos Reis2â,
L. Douglas57,
A.G. Downes10â,
W. Duan69â,
P. Duda77â,
M.W. Dudek38â,
L. Dufour46â,
V. Duk31â,
P. Durante46â,
M. M. Duras77â,
J.M. Durham65â,
D. Dutta60â,
A. Dziurda38â,
A. Dzyuba41â,
S. Easo55,46â,
E. Eckstein73,
U. Egede1â,
A. Egorychev41â,
V. Egorychev41â,
C. Eirea Orro44,
S. Eisenhardt56â,
E. Ejopu60â,
S. Ek-In47â,
L. Eklund78â,
M. Elashri63â,
J. Ellbracht17â,
S. Ely59â,
A. Ene40â,
E. Epple63â,
S. Escher16â,
J. Eschle48â,
S. Esen48â,
T. Evans60â,
F. Fabiano29,i,46â,
L.N. Falcao2â,
Y. Fan7â,
B. Fang71,13â,
L. Fantini31,pâ,
M. Faria47â,
K. Â Farmer56â,
D. Fazzini28,nâ,
L. Felkowski77â,
M. Feng5,7â,
M. Feo46â,
M. Fernandez Gomez44â,
A.D. Fernez64â,
F. Ferrari22â,
F. Ferreira Rodrigues3â,
S. Ferreres Sole35â,
M. Ferrillo48â,
M. Ferro-Luzzi46â,
S. Filippov41â,
R.A. Fini21â,
M. Fiorini23,jâ,
M. Firlej37â,
K.M. Fischer61â,
D.S. Fitzgerald79â,
C. Fitzpatrick60â,
T. Fiutowski37â,
F. Fleuret14â,
M. Fontana22â,
F. Fontanelli26,lâ,
L. F. Â Foreman60â,
R. Forty46â,
D. Foulds-Holt53â,
M. Franco Sevilla64â,
M. Frank46â,
E. Franzoso23,jâ,
G. Frau19â,
C. Frei46â,
D.A. Friday60â,
L. Frontini27,mâ,
J. Fu7â,
Q. Fuehring17â,
Y. Fujii1â,
T. Fulghesu15â,
E. Gabriel35â,
G. Galati21,gâ,
M.D. Galati35â,
A. Gallas Torreira44â,
D. Galli22,hâ,
S. Gambetta56,46â,
M. Gandelman3â,
P. Gandini27â,
H. Gao7â,
R. Gao61â,
Y. Gao8â,
Y. Gao6â,
Y. Gao8,
M. Garau29,iâ,
L.M. Garcia Martin47â,
P. Garcia Moreno43â,
J. GarcĂa PardiĂąas46â,
B. Garcia Plana44,
K. G. Â Garg8â,
L. Garrido43â,
C. Gaspar46â,
R.E. Geertsema35â,
L.L. Gerken17â,
E. Gersabeck60â,
M. Gersabeck60â,
T. Gershon54â,
Z. Ghorbanimoghaddam52,
L. Giambastiani30â,
F. I. Â Giasemis15,dâ,
V. Gibson53â,
H.K. Giemza39â,
A.L. Gilman61â,
M. Giovannetti25â,
A. GioventĂš43â,
P. Gironella Gironell43â,
C. Giugliano23,jâ,
M.A. Giza38â,
E.L. Gkougkousis59â,
F.C. Glaser13,19â,
V.V. Gligorov15â,
C. GĂśbel67â,
E. Golobardes42â,
D. Golubkov41â,
A. Golutvin59,41,46â,
A. Gomes2,a,â â,
S. Gomez Fernandez43â,
F. Goncalves Abrantes61â,
M. Goncerz38â,
G. Gong4â,
J. A. Gooding17â,
I.V. Gorelov41â,
C. Gotti28â,
J.P. Grabowski73â,
L.A. Granado Cardoso46â,
E. GraugĂŠs43â,
E. Graverini47â,
L. Grazette54â,
G. Grazianiâ,
A. T. Grecu40â,
L.M. Greeven35â,
N.A. Grieser63â,
L. Grillo57â,
S. Gromov41â,
C. Â Gu14â,
M. Guarise23â,
M. Guittiere13â,
V. Guliaeva41â,
P. A. GĂźnther19â,
A.K. Guseinov41â,
E. Gushchin41â,
Y. Guz6,41,46â,
T. Gys46â,
T. Hadavizadeh1â,
C. Hadjivasiliou64â,
G. Haefeli47â,
C. Haen46â,
J. Haimberger46â,
M. Hajheidari46,
T. Halewood-leagas58â,
M.M. Halvorsen46â,
P.M. Hamilton64â,
J. Hammerich58â,
Q. Han8â,
X. Han19â,
S. Hansmann-Menzemer19â,
L. Hao7â,
N. Harnew61â,
T. Harrison58â,
M. Hartmann13â,
C. Hasse46â,
J. He7,câ,
K. Heijhoff35â,
F. Hemmer46â,
C. Henderson63â,
R.D.L. Henderson1,54â,
A.M. Hennequin46â,
K. Hennessy58â,
L. Henry47â,
J. Herd59â,
J. Heuel16â,
A. Hicheur3â,
D. Hill47â,
S.E. Hollitt17â,
J. Horswill60â,
R. Hou8â,
Y. Hou10â,
N. Howarth58,
J. Hu19,
J. Hu69â,
W. Hu6â,
X. Hu4â,
W. Huang7â,
W. Hulsbergen35â,
R.J. Hunter54â,
M. Hushchyn41â,
D. Hutchcroft58â,
M. Idzik37â,
D. Ilin41â,
P. Ilten63â,
A. Inglessi41â,
A. Iniukhin41â,
A. Ishteev41â,
K. Ivshin41â,
R. Jacobsson46â,
H. Jage16â,
S.J. Jaimes Elles45,72â,
S. Jakobsen46â,
E. Jans35â,
B.K. Jashal45â,
A. Jawahery64â,
V. Jevtic17â,
E. Jiang64â,
X. Jiang5,7â,
Y. Jiang7â,
Y. J. Â Jiang6â,
M. John61â,
D. Johnson51â,
C.R. Jones53â,
T.P. Jones54â,
S. Joshi39â,
B. Jost46â,
N. Jurik46â,
I. Juszczak38â,
D. Kaminaris47â,
S. Kandybei49â,
Y. Kang4â,
M. Karacson46â,
D. Karpenkov41â,
M. Karpov41â,
A. M. Â Kauniskangas47â,
J.W. Kautz63â,
F. Keizer46â,
D.M. Keller66â,
M. Kenzie53â,
T. Ketel35â,
B. Khanji66â,
A. Kharisova41â,
S. Kholodenko32â,
G. Khreich13â,
T. Kirn16â,
V.S. Kirsebom47â,
O. Kitouni62â,
S. Klaver36â,
N. Kleijne32,qâ,
K. Klimaszewski39â,
M.R. Kmiec39â,
S. Koliiev50â,
L. Kolk17â,
A. Konoplyannikov41â,
P. Kopciewicz37,46â,
P. Koppenburg35â,
M. Korolev41â,
I. Kostiuk35â,
O. Kot50,
S. Kotriakhovaâ,
A. Kozachuk41â,
P. Kravchenko41â,
L. Kravchuk41â,
M. Kreps54â,
S. Kretzschmar16â,
P. Krokovny41â,
W. Krupa66â,
W. Krzemien39â,
J. Kubat19,
S. Kubis77â,
W. Kucewicz38â,
M. Kucharczyk38â,
V. Kudryavtsev41â,
E. Kulikova41â,
A. Kupsc78â,
B. K. Â Kutsenko12â,
D. Lacarrere46â,
G. Lafferty60â,
A. Lai29â,
A. Lampis29â,
D. Lancierini48â,
C. Landesa Gomez44â,
J.J. Lane1â,
R. Lane52â,
C. Langenbruch19â,
J. Langer17â,
O. Lantwin41â,
T. Latham54â,
F. Lazzari32,râ,
C. Lazzeroni51â,
R. Le Gac12â,
S.H. Lee79â,
R. Lefèvre11â,
A. Leflat41â,
S. Legotin41â,
M. Lehuraux54â,
O. Leroy12â,
T. Lesiak38â,
B. Leverington19â,
A. Li4â,
H. Li69â,
K. Li8â,
L. Li60â,
P. Li46â,
P.-R. Li70â,
S. Li8â,
T. Li5â,
T. Li69â,
Y. Li8,
Y. Li5â,
Z. Li66â,
Z. Lian4â,
X. Liang66â,
C. Lin7â,
T. Lin55â,
R. Lindner46â,
V. Lisovskyi47â,
R. Litvinov29,iâ,
G. Liu69â,
H. Liu7â,
K. Liu70â,
Q. Liu7â,
S. Liu5,7â,
Y. Liu56â,
Y. Liu70,
Y. L. Â Liu59â,
A. Lobo Salvia43â,
A. Loi29â,
J. Lomba Castro44â,
T. Long53â,
J.H. Lopes3â,
A. Lopez Huertas43â,
S. LĂłpez SoliĂąo44â,
G.H. Lovell53â,
C. Lucarelli24,kâ,
D. Lucchesi30,oâ,
S. Luchuk41â,
M. Lucio Martinez76â,
V. Lukashenko35,50â,
Y. Luo4â,
A. Lupato30â,
E. Luppi23,jâ,
K. Lynch20â,
X.-R. Lyu7â,
G. M. Â Ma4â,
R. Ma7â,
S. Maccolini17â,
F. Machefert13â,
F. Maciuc40â,
I. Mackay61â,
L.R. Madhan Mohan53â,
M. M. Â Madurai51â,
A. Maevskiy41â,
D. Magdalinski35â,
D. Maisuzenko41â,
M.W. Majewski37,
J.J. Malczewski38â,
S. Malde61â,
B. Malecki38,46â,
L. Malentacca46,
A. Malinin41â,
T. Maltsev41â,
G. Manca29,iâ,
G. Mancinelli12â,
C. Mancuso27,13,mâ,
R. Manera Escalero43,
D. Manuzzi22â,
D. Marangotto27,mâ,
J.F. Marchand10â,
R. Marchevski47â,
U. Marconi22â,
S. Mariani46â,
C. Marin Benito43,46â,
J. Marks19â,
A.M. Marshall52â,
P.J. Marshall58,
G. Martelli31,pâ,
G. Martellotti33â,
L. Martinazzoli46â,
M. Martinelli28,nâ,
D. Martinez Santos44â,
F. Martinez Vidal45â,
A. Massafferri2â,
M. Materok16â,
R. Matev46â,
A. Mathad48â,
V. Matiunin41â,
C. Matteuzzi66â,
K.R. Mattioli14â,
A. Mauri59â,
E. Maurice14â,
J. Mauricio43â,
P. Mayencourt47â,
M. Mazurek46â,
M. McCann59â,
L. Mcconnell20â,
T.H. McGrath60â,
N.T. McHugh57â,
A. McNab60â,
R. McNulty20â,
B. Meadows63â,
G. Meier17â,
D. Melnychuk39â,
M. Merk35,76â,
A. Merli27,mâ,
L. Meyer Garcia3â,
D. Miao5,7â,
H. Miao7â,
M. Mikhasenko73,eâ,
D.A. Milanes72â,
A. Minotti28,nâ,
E. Minucci66â,
T. Miralles11â,
S.E. Mitchell56â,
B. Mitreska17â,
D.S. Mitzel17â,
A. Modak55â,
A. MĂśdden 17â,
R.A. Mohammed61â,
R.D. Moise16â,
S. Mokhnenko41â,
T. Mombächer46â,
M. Monk54,1â,
I.A. Monroy72â,
S. Monteil11â,
A. Morcillo Gomez44â,
G. Morello25â,
M.J. Morello32,qâ,
M.P. Morgenthaler19â,
J. Moron37â,
A.B. Morris46â,
A.G. Morris12â,
R. Mountain66â,
H. Mu4â,
Z. M. Â Mu6â,
E. Muhammad54â,
F. Muheim56â,
M. Mulder75â,
K. MĂźller48â,
F. MĹŠnoz-Rojas9â,
R. Murta59â,
P. Naik58â,
T. Nakada47â,
R. Nandakumar55â,
T. Nanut46â,
I. Nasteva3â,
M. Needham56â,
N. Neri27,mâ,
S. Neubert73â,
N. Neufeld46â,
P. Neustroev41,
R. Newcombe59,
J. Nicolini17,13â,
D. Nicotra76â,
E.M. Niel47â,
N. Nikitin41â,
P. Nogga73,
N.S. Nolte62â,
C. Normand10,i,29â,
J. Novoa Fernandez44â,
G. Nowak63â,
C. Nunez79â,
H. N. Â Nur57â,
A. Oblakowska-Mucha37â,
V. Obraztsov41â,
T. Oeser16â,
S. Okamura23,j,46â,
R. Oldeman29,iâ,
F. Oliva56â,
M. Olocco17â,
C.J.G. Onderwater76â,
R.H. OâNeil56â,
J.M. Otalora Goicochea3â,
T. Ovsiannikova41â,
P. Owen48â,
A. Oyanguren45â,
O. Ozcelik56â,
K.O. Padeken73â,
B. Pagare54â,
P.R. Pais19â,
T. Pajero61â,
A. Palano21â,
M. Palutan25â,
G. Panshin41â,
L. Paolucci54â,
A. Papanestis55â,
M. Pappagallo21,gâ,
L.L. Pappalardo23,jâ,
C. Pappenheimer63â,
C. Parkes60â,
B. Passalacqua23,jâ,
G. Passaleva24â,
D. Passaro32â,
A. Pastore21â,
M. Patel59â,
J. Patoc61â,
C. Patrignani22,hâ,
C.J. Pawley76â,
A. Pellegrino35â,
M. Pepe Altarelli25â,
S. Perazzini22â,
D. Pereima41â,
A. Pereiro Castro44â,
P. Perret11â,
A. Perro46â,
K. Petridis52â,
A. Petrolini26,lâ,
S. Petrucci56â,
H. Pham66â,
L. Pica32â,
M. Piccini31â,
B. Pietrzyk10â,
G. Pietrzyk13â,
D. Pinci33â,
F. Pisani46â,
M. Pizzichemi28,nâ,
V. Placinta40â,
M. Plo Casasus44â,
F. Polci15,46â,
M. Poli Lener25â,
A. Poluektov12â,
N. Polukhina41â,
I. Polyakov46â,
E. Polycarpo3â,
S. Ponce46â,
D. Popov7â,
S. Poslavskii41â,
K. Prasanth38â,
L. Promberger19â,
C. Prouve44â,
V. Pugatch50â,
V. Puill13â,
G. Punzi32,râ,
H.R. Qi4â,
W. Qian7â,
N. Qin4â,
S. Qu4â,
R. Quagliani47â,
R.I. Rabadan Trejo54â,
B. Rachwal37â,
J.H. Rademacker52â,
M. Rama32â,
M.  RamĂrez GarcĂa79â,
M. Ramos Pernas54â,
M.S. Rangel3â,
F. Ratnikov41â,
G. Raven36â,
M. Rebollo De Miguel45â,
F. Redi46â,
J. Reich52â,
F. Reiss60â,
Z. Ren7â,
P.K. Resmi61â,
R. Ribatti32,qâ,
G. R. Â Ricart14,80â,
D. Riccardi32â,
S. Ricciardi55â,
K. Richardson62â,
M. Richardson-Slipper56â,
K. Rinnert58â,
P. Robbe13â,
G. Robertson57â,
E. Rodrigues58,46â,
E. Rodriguez Fernandez44â,
J.A. Rodriguez Lopez72â,
E. Rodriguez Rodriguez44â,
A. Rogovskiy55â,
D.L. Rolf46â,
A. Rollings61â,
P. Roloff46â,
V. Romanovskiy41â,
M. Romero Lamas44â,
A. Romero Vidal44â,
G. Romolini23â,
F. Ronchetti47â,
M. Rotondo25â,
S. R. Â Roy19â,
M.S. Rudolph66â,
T. Ruf46â,
M. Ruiz Diaz19â,
R.A. Ruiz Fernandez44â,
J. Ruiz Vidal78,yâ,
A. Ryzhikov41â,
J. Ryzka37â,
J.J. Saborido Silva44â,
R. Sadek14â,
N. Sagidova41â,
N. Sahoo51â,
B. Saitta29,iâ,
M. Salomoni28,nâ,
C. Sanchez Gras35â,
I. Sanderswood45â,
R. Santacesaria33â,
C. Santamarina Rios44â,
M. Santimaria25â,
L. Santoro 2â,
E. Santovetti34â,
A. Saputi23,46â,
D. Saranin41â,
G. Sarpis56â,
M. Sarpis73â,
A. Sarti33â,
C. Satriano33,sâ,
A. Satta34â,
M. Saur6â,
D. Savrina41â,
H. Sazak11â,
L.G. Scantlebury Smead61â,
A. Scarabotto15â,
S. Schael16â,
S. Scherl58â,
A. M. Â Schertz74â,
M. Schiller57â,
H. Schindler46â,
M. Schmelling18â,
B. Schmidt46â,
S. Schmitt16â,
H. Schmitz73,
O. Schneider47â,
A. Schopper46â,
N. Schulte17â,
S. Schulte47â,
M.H. Schune13â,
R. Schwemmer46â,
G. Schwering16â,
B. Sciascia25â,
A. Sciuccati46â,
S. Sellam44â,
A. Semennikov41â,
M. Senghi Soares36â,
A. Sergi26,lâ,
N. Serra48,46â,
L. Sestini30â,
A. Seuthe17â,
Y. Shang6â,
D.M. Shangase79â,
M. Shapkin41â,
I. Shchemerov41â,
L. Shchutska47â,
T. Shears58â,
L. Shekhtman41â,
Z. Shen6â,
S. Sheng5,7â,
V. Shevchenko41â,
B. Shi7â,
E.B. Shields28,nâ,
Y. Shimizu13â,
E. Shmanin41â,
R. Shorkin41â,
J.D. Shupperd66â,
R. Silva Coutinho66â,
G. Simi30â,
S. Simone21,gâ,
N. Skidmore60â,
R. Skuza19â,
T. Skwarnicki66â,
M.W. Slater51â,
J.C. Smallwood61â,
E. Smith62â,
K. Smith65â,
M. Smith59â,
A. Snoch35â,
L. Soares Lavra56â,
M.D. Sokoloff63â,
F.J.P. Soler57â,
A. Solomin41,52â,
A. Solovev41â,
I. Solovyev41â,
R. Song1â,
Y. Song47â,
Y. Song4â,
Y. S. Â Song6â,
F.L. Souza De Almeida66â,
B. Souza De Paula3â,
E. Spadaro Norella27,mâ,
E. Spedicato22â,
J.G. Speer17â,
E. Spiridenkov41,
P. Spradlin57â,
V. Sriskaran46â,
F. Stagni46â,
M. Stahl46â,
S. Stahl46â,
S. Stanislaus61â,
E.N. Stein46â,
O. Steinkamp48â,
O. Stenyakin41,
H. Stevens17â,
D. Strekalina41â,
Y. Su7â,
F. Suljik61â,
J. Sun29â,
L. Sun71â,
Y. Sun64â,
P.N. Swallow51â,
K. Swientek37â,
F. Swystun54â,
A. Szabelski39â,
T. Szumlak37â,
M. Szymanski46â,
Y. Tan4â,
S. Taneja60â,
M.D. Tat61â,
A. Terentev48â,
F. Terzuoli32,uâ,
F. Teubert46â,
E. Thomas46â,
D.J.D. Thompson51â,
H. Tilquin59â,
V. Tisserand11â,
S. TâJampens10â,
M. Tobin5â,
L. Tomassetti23,jâ,
G. Tonani27,mâ,
X. Tong6â,
D. Torres Machado2â,
L. Toscano17â,
D.Y. Tou4â,
C. Trippl42â,
G. Tuci19â,
N. Tuning35â,
L.H. Uecker19â,
A. Ukleja37â,
D.J. Unverzagt19â,
E. Ursov41â,
A. Usachov36â,
A. Ustyuzhanin41â,
U. Uwer19â,
V. Vagnoni22â,
A. Valassi46â,
G. Valenti22â,
N. Valls Canudas42â,
H. Van Hecke65â,
E. van Herwijnen59â,
C.B. Van Hulse44,wâ,
R. Van Laak47â,
M. van Veghel35â,
R. Vazquez Gomez43â,
P. Vazquez Regueiro44â,
C. VĂĄzquez Sierra44â,
S. Vecchi23â,
J.J. Velthuis52â,
M. Veltri24,vâ,
A. Venkateswaran47â,
M. Vesterinen54â,
D.  Vieira63â,
M. Vieites Diaz46â,
X. Vilasis-Cardona42â,
E. Vilella Figueras58â,
A. Villa22â,
P. Vincent15â,
F.C. Volle13â,
D. vom Bruch12â,
V. Vorobyev41,
N. Voropaev41â,
K. Vos76â,
G. Vouters10,
C. Vrahas56â,
J. Walsh32â,
E.J. Walton1â,
G. Wan6â,
C. Wang19â,
G. Wang8â,
J. Wang6â,
J. Wang5â,
J. Wang4â,
J. Wang71â,
M. Wang27â,
N. W. Â Wang7â,
R. Wang52â,
X. Wang69â,
X. W. Â Wang59â,
Y. Wang8â,
Z. Wang13â,
Z. Wang4â,
Z. Wang7â,
J.A. Ward54,1â,
N.K. Watson51â,
D. Websdale59â,
Y. Wei6â,
B.D.C. Westhenry52â,
D.J. White60â,
M. Whitehead57â,
A.R. Wiederhold54â,
D. Wiedner17â,
G. Wilkinson61â,
M.K. Wilkinson63â,
M. Williams62â,
M.R.J. Williams56â,
R. Williams53â,
F.F. Wilson55â,
W. Wislicki39â,
M. Witek38â,
L. Witola19â,
C.P. Wong65â,
G. Wormser13â,
S.A. Wotton53â,
H. Wu66â,
J. Wu8â,
Y. Wu6â,
K. Wyllie46â,
S. Xian69,
Z. Xiang5â,
Y. Xie8â,
A. Xu32â,
J. Xu7â,
L. Xu4â,
L. Xu4â,
M. Xu54â,
Z. Xu11â,
Z. Xu7â,
Z. Xu5â,
D. Yang4â,
S. Yang7â,
X. Yang6â,
Y. Yang26â,
Z. Yang6â,
Z. Yang64â,
V. Yeroshenko13â,
H. Yeung60â,
H. Yin8â,
C. Y. Â Yu6â,
J. Yu68â,
X. Yuan5â,
E. Zaffaroni47â,
M. Zavertyaev18â,
M. Zdybal38â,
M. Zeng4â,
C. Zhang6â,
D. Zhang8â,
J. Zhang7â,
L. Zhang4â,
S. Zhang68â,
S. Zhang6â,
Y. Zhang6â,
Y. Zhang61,
Y. Z. Â Zhang4â,
Y. Zhao19â,
A. Zharkova41â,
A. Zhelezov19â,
X. Z. Â Zheng4â,
Y. Zheng7â,
T. Zhou6â,
X. Zhou8â,
Y. Zhou7â,
V. Zhovkovska54â,
L. Z. Â Zhu7â,
X. Zhu4â,
X. Zhu8â,
Z. Zhu7â,
V. Zhukov16,41â,
J. Zhuo45â,
Q. Zou5,7â,
D. Zuliani30â,
G. Zunica60â.
1School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
2Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas FĂsicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
3Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
4Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Bei**g, China
5Institute Of High Energy Physics (IHEP), Bei**g, China
6School of Physics State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Bei**g, China
7University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei**g, China
8Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
9Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE), San Jose, Costa Rica
10UniversitĂŠ Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France
11UniversitĂŠ Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France
12Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France
13UniversitĂŠ Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France
14Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau, France
15LPNHE, Sorbonne UniversitĂŠ, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris CitĂŠ, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
16I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
17Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
18Max-Planck-Institut fĂźr Kernphysik (MPIK), Heidelberg, Germany
19Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
20School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
21INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
22INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
23INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
24INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
25INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
26INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy
27INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
28INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
29INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
30UniversitĂ degli Studi di Padova, UniversitĂ e INFN, Padova, Padova, Italy
31INFN Sezione di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
32INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
33INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
34INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
35Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
36Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
37AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, KrakĂłw, Poland
38Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, KrakĂłw, Poland
39National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland
40Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
41Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
42DS4DS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain
43ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
44Instituto Galego de FĂsica de Altas EnerxĂas (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
45Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain
46European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
47Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique FĂŠdĂŠrale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
48Physik-Institut, Universität Zßrich, Zßrich, Switzerland
49NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT), Kharkiv, Ukraine
50Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine
51University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
52H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
53Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
54Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
55STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
56School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
57School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
58Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
59Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
60Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
61Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
62Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
63University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
64University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
65Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM, United States
66Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States
67PontifĂcia Universidade CatĂłlica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, associated to 3
68Physics and Micro Electronic College, Hunan University, Changsha City, China, associated to 8
69Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China, associated to 4
70Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China, associated to 5
71School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, associated to 4
72Departamento de Fisica , Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia, associated to 15
73Universität Bonn - Helmholtz-Institut fßr Strahlen und Kernphysik, Bonn, Germany, associated to 19
74Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary, associated to 46
75Van Swinderen Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, associated to 35
76Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands, associated to 35
77Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland, associated to 38
78Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, associated to 57
79University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, associated to 66
80Departement de Physique Nucleaire (SPhN), Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
aUniversidade de BrasĂlia, BrasĂlia, Brazil
bCentro Federal de EducacĂŁo TecnolĂłgica Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
cHangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, UCAS, Hangzhou, China
dLIP6, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
eExcellence Cluster ORIGINS, Munich, Germany
fUniversidad Nacional AutĂłnoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
gUniversitĂ di Bari, Bari, Italy
hUniversitĂ di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
iUniversitĂ di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
jUniversitĂ di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
kUniversitĂ di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
lUniversitĂ di Genova, Genova, Italy
mUniversitĂ degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
nUniversitĂ di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
oUniversitĂ di Padova, Padova, Italy
pUniversitĂ di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
qScuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy
rUniversitĂ di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
sUniversitĂ della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
tUniversitĂ di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
uUniversitĂ di Siena, Siena, Italy
vUniversitĂ di Urbino, Urbino, Italy
wUniversidad de AlcalĂĄ, AlcalĂĄ de Henares , Spain
xUniversidade da CoruĂąa, CoruĂąa, Spain
yDepartment of Physics/Division of Particle Physics, Lund, Sweden
â Deceased