License: CC BY 4.0
arXiv:2402.00264v1 [hep-ph] 01 Feb 2024

Asymmetric jet shapes with 2D jet tomography

Yu-Xin Xiao Key Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China    Yayun He School of Physics and Optoelectronics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China    Long-Gang Pang Key Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China    Hanzhong Zhang [email protected] Key Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Southern Nuclear Science Computing Center, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China    Xin-Nian Wang [email protected] Key Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China Nuclear Science Division, MS 70R0319, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
(February 1, 2024)
Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) jet tomography is a promising tool to study jet medium modification in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. It combines gradient (transverse) and longitudinal jet tomography for selection of events with localized initial jet production positions. It exploits the transverse asymmetry and energy loss that depend, respectively, on the transverse gradient and jet path length inside the quark-gluon plasma (QGP). In this study, we employ the 2D jet tomography to study medium modification of the jet shape of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-triggered jets within the linear Boltzmann transport (LBT) model for jet propagation in heavy-ion collisions. Our results show that jets with small transverse asymmetry (ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) or small γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet asymmetry (xJγ=pTjet/pTγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾x_{J\gamma}=p_{T}^{\rm jet}/p_{T}^{\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) exhibit a broader jet shape than those with larger ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT or xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, since the former are produced at the center and go through longer path lengths while the later are off-center and close to the surface of the QGP fireball. In events with finite values of ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, jet shapes are asymmetric with respect to the event plane. Hard partons at the core of the jet are deflected away from the denser region while soft partons from the medium response at large angles flow toward the denser part of QGP. Future experimental measurements of these asymmetric features of the jet shape can be used to study the transport properties of jets and medium responses.

I INTRODUCTION

A few microseconds after the Big Bang, the Universe was filled with a novel state of matter called quark-gluon plasma (QGP) that consists of deconfined quarks and gluons. In the past two decades, relativistic heavy-ion collision experiments have been carried out at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at BNL and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN to produce such hot and dense QGP matter and study its properties.

Together with the formation of QGP, large transverse momentum partons (pTsubscript𝑝𝑇p_{T}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) are also produced in the early stage of relativistic heavy-ion collisions that will traverse the QGP and encounter multiple scattering with quarks and gluons inside the medium. These scatterings will also induce gluon bremsstrahlung and cause a significant amount of energy loss to the propagating parton, leading to a phenomenon called jet quenching Gyulassy and Plumer (1990); Wang and Gyulassy (1992); Qin and Wang (2015). Large transverse momentum (pTsubscript𝑝𝑇p_{T}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) hadrons and jets are significantly suppressed due to jet quenching in heavy-ion collisions, as compared to large pTsubscript𝑝𝑇p_{T}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT hadrons and jets in proton-proton collisions. Jet quenching has been observed in experiments by PHENIX Adare et al. (2010) and STAR Adler et al. (2002) Collaboration at RHIC, ALICE Abelev et al. (2013), ATLAS Aad et al. (2012) and CMS Chatrchyan et al. (2012); Sirunyan et al. (2018) Collaboration at LHC. In addition, large pTsubscript𝑝𝑇p_{T}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT dihadrons, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-hadrons and dijets are also suppressed and exhibit azimuthal decorrelation Wang and Wang (2002); Vitev (2004); Zhang et al. (2007, 2009); Vitev and Zhang (2010). Full jet structure is also modified Qin and Muller (2011); He et al. (2012); Young et al. (2011); Barata et al. (2023a) by the QGP medium as observed at both RHIC and LHC Adams et al. (2006); Casalderrey-Solana et al. (2011); Aamodt et al. (2010); Aad et al. (2010); Sirunyan et al. (2019).

Theoretical studies have revealed that the strength of jet quenching is proportional to jet transport coefficient q^^𝑞\hat{q}over^ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG, which is defined as the transverse momentum squared per unit length along the parton trajectory Baier et al. (1997a, b, 1998); Guo and Wang (2000); Wang and Guo (2001); Casalderrey-Solana and Wang (2008); Majumder (2012). This coefficient is directly related to the medium gluon density. In high-energy heavy-ion collisions, the spatial distribution of gluon density and the jet transport coefficient are not uniform inside the QGP fireball. They reach their highest values in the central region of the QGP where the temperature is also the highest. The initial spatial distributions are given by the nuclear geometry of two colliding nuclei and the time evolution can be determined from hydrodynamic model of heavy-ion collisions. Jet tomographic techniques have been developed that exploit these non-uniform distributions of the medium and jet quenching strength to reveal information about the locations of the initial jet production.

The longitudinal tomography was first proposed in Refs. Zhang et al. (2007, 2009) to localize the initial jet production positions along the direction of jet propagation in the study of dihadron and γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-hadron spectra in heavy-ion collisions. In the case of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet processes, low pTsubscript𝑝𝑇p_{T}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-associated hadrons are produced primarily through the fragmentation of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets created in the central region of the medium (volume emission) after losing some amount of energy. The high pTsubscript𝑝𝑇p_{T}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-associated hadrons, however, mainly come from γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets initially produced in the outer corona region (surface emission) that suffer little or no energy loss. Furthermore, a significant fraction of the surface emission is tangential to the medium surface. In a more recent study He et al. (2020), a transverse or gradient jet tomography was developed. In this case, an asymmetry observable ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT caused by the transverse gradient of the medium for high pTsubscript𝑝𝑇p_{T}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT hadrons inside a jet is introduced to localize the initial position of jet production perpendicular to the jet propagation direction. Two-dimensional (2D) jet tomography combines longitudinal and transverse tomography to localize the initial jet production positions in the transverse plane. Such 2D jet tomography has been applied to select special classes of events with localized region of initial jet production so that signals of jet-induced medium response are enhanced Yang et al. (2021, 2023a).

In this work, we study medium-modified γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet shape in events of jet production selected with transverse and longitudinal jet tomography in heavy-ion collisions, using the linear Boltzmann transport (LBT) model Li et al. (2011); He et al. (2015); Cao et al. (2016); Wang and Zhu (2013); Cao and Wang (2021); Luo et al. (2023) for jet transport simulations in the QGP medium. We consider in particular the asymmetric jet shape caused by flow and gradient of the hot QGP medium along the path of jet propagation in events selected with the 2D jet tomography.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Sec. II introduces the LBT model and the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet shape in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions. Sec. III describes the technique of transverse and longitudinal tomography for γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet events. The numerical results for the medium-modified jet shape via transverse and longitudinal tomography are presented in Sec. IV. In Sec. V, we investigate the asymmetric jet shape in events with special class of jet propagation path relative to the geometry of the dense QGP medium as selected by 2D jet tomography. A summary is given in Sec. VI.

II Jet shape in the LBT model

The linear Boltzmann transport (LBT) model Li et al. (2011); He et al. (2015); Cao et al. (2016); Wang and Zhu (2013); Cao and Wang (2021) was developed to study jet propagation in quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions, and to describe not only parton energy loss but also jet-induced medium excitation. It has been used to describe experimental data on suppression of single hadrons Cao et al. (2016), single jets He et al. (2019), and γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-hadron Chen et al. (2018) and γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet correlations Luo et al. (2018) in heavy-ion collisions at both RHIC and LHC energies.

The transport of jet shower and recoil partons is described by the linear Boltzmann equations,

pafa=i=b,c,dd3pi2Ei(2π)3γb2(fcfdfafb)|abcd|2×S2(s^,t^,u^)2π4δ4(pa+pbpcpd)+inelastic,subscript𝑝𝑎subscript𝑓𝑎subscriptproduct𝑖𝑏𝑐𝑑superscript𝑑3subscript𝑝𝑖2subscript𝐸𝑖superscript2𝜋3subscript𝛾𝑏2subscript𝑓𝑐subscript𝑓𝑑subscript𝑓𝑎subscript𝑓𝑏superscriptsubscript𝑎𝑏𝑐𝑑2subscript𝑆2^𝑠^𝑡^𝑢2superscript𝜋4superscript𝛿4subscript𝑝𝑎subscript𝑝𝑏subscript𝑝𝑐subscript𝑝𝑑inelastic\displaystyle\begin{split}p_{a}&\cdot\partial f_{a}=\int\prod_{i=b,c,d}\frac{d% ^{3}p_{i}}{2E_{i}(2\pi)^{3}}\frac{\gamma_{b}}{2}(f_{c}f_{d}-f_{a}f_{b})|% \mathcal{M}_{ab\rightarrow cd}|^{2}\\ &\times S_{2}(\hat{s},\hat{t},\hat{u}){2\pi}^{4}\delta^{4}(p_{a}+p_{b}-p_{c}-p% _{d})+{\rm inelastic},\end{split}start_ROW start_CELL italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL ⋅ ∂ italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∫ ∏ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = italic_b , italic_c , italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) | caligraphic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_b → italic_c italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL end_CELL start_CELL × italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over^ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG , over^ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG , over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG ) 2 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + roman_inelastic , end_CELL end_ROW (1)

where |abcd|subscript𝑎𝑏𝑐𝑑|\mathcal{M}_{ab\rightarrow cd}|| caligraphic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_b → italic_c italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | is the leading-order elastic scattering amplitude that depends on the Mandelstam variables s^,t^^𝑠^𝑡\hat{s},\hat{t}over^ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG , over^ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG, and u^^𝑢\hat{u}over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG. fi=(2π)3δ3(ppi)δ3(xxivit)(i=a,c)subscript𝑓𝑖superscript2𝜋3superscript𝛿3𝑝subscript𝑝𝑖superscript𝛿3𝑥subscript𝑥𝑖subscript𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑐f_{i}=(2\pi)^{3}\delta^{3}(\vec{p}-\vec{p}_{i})\delta^{3}(\vec{x}-\vec{x_{i}}-% \vec{v_{i}}t)(i=a,c)italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG - over→ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_x end_ARG - over→ start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG - over→ start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_t ) ( italic_i = italic_a , italic_c ) is the phase space density for jet shower partons before and after scattering. fi=1/(epiu/T±1)(i=b,d)subscript𝑓𝑖1plus-or-minussuperscript𝑒subscript𝑝𝑖𝑢𝑇1𝑖𝑏𝑑f_{i}=1/(e^{p_{i}\cdot u/T}\pm 1)(i=b,d)italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / ( italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ italic_u / italic_T end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± 1 ) ( italic_i = italic_b , italic_d ) is the phase space distribution of thermal partons in the QGP medium with local temperature T𝑇Titalic_T and fluid 4-velocity u𝑢uitalic_u. The regularization factor,

S2(s^,t^,u^)=θ(s^2μD2)θ(s^+μD2t^μD2),subscript𝑆2^𝑠^𝑡^𝑢𝜃^𝑠2superscriptsubscript𝜇𝐷2𝜃^𝑠superscriptsubscript𝜇𝐷2^𝑡superscriptsubscript𝜇𝐷2S_{2}(\hat{s},\hat{t},\hat{u})=\theta(\hat{s}\geq 2\mu_{D}^{2})\theta(-\hat{s}% +\mu_{D}^{2}\leq\hat{t}\leq-\mu_{D}^{2}),italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over^ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG , over^ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG , over^ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG ) = italic_θ ( over^ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG ≥ 2 italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_θ ( - over^ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG + italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ over^ start_ARG italic_t end_ARG ≤ - italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , (2)

is used to regulate the collinear divergence in |abcd|subscript𝑎𝑏𝑐𝑑|\mathcal{M}_{ab\rightarrow cd}|| caligraphic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_b → italic_c italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT |, and μD2=3g2T2/2superscriptsubscript𝜇𝐷23superscript𝑔2superscript𝑇22\mu_{D}^{2}=3g^{2}T^{2}/2italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 3 italic_g start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / 2 is the Debye screening mass.

The description of inelastic processes of induced gluon radiation in the LBT model is based on the high-twist approach Guo and Wang (2000); Zhang et al. (2004) with the radiative gluon spectrum,

dNgadzdk2dτ=6αsPa(z)k4π(k2+z2m2)4pup0q^a(x)sin2ττi2τf,𝑑subscriptsuperscript𝑁𝑎𝑔𝑑𝑧𝑑subscriptsuperscript𝑘2perpendicular-to𝑑𝜏6subscript𝛼𝑠subscript𝑃𝑎𝑧subscriptsuperscript𝑘4perpendicular-to𝜋superscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝑘2perpendicular-tosuperscript𝑧2superscript𝑚24𝑝𝑢subscript𝑝0subscript^𝑞𝑎𝑥superscript2𝜏subscript𝜏𝑖2subscript𝜏𝑓\frac{dN^{a}_{g}}{dzdk^{2}_{\perp}d\tau}=\frac{6\alpha_{s}P_{a}(z)k^{4}_{\perp% }}{\pi(k^{2}_{\perp}+z^{2}m^{2})^{4}}\frac{p\cdot u}{p_{0}}\hat{q}_{a}(x)\sin^% {2}\frac{\tau-\tau_{i}}{2\tau_{f}},divide start_ARG italic_d italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_z italic_d italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_τ end_ARG = divide start_ARG 6 italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z ) italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_π ( italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_p ⋅ italic_u end_ARG start_ARG italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG over^ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x ) roman_sin start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_τ - italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , (3)

where m𝑚mitalic_m is the mass of the propagating parton a𝑎aitalic_a, z𝑧zitalic_z and ksubscript𝑘perpendicular-tok_{\perp}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the energy fraction and transverse momentum of radiated gluon, respectively. αssubscript𝛼𝑠\alpha_{s}italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the strong coupling constant, and q^asubscript^𝑞𝑎\hat{q}_{a}over^ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the jet transport coefficient, defined as the transverse momentum transfer squared per unit path for the parton a𝑎aitalic_a traveling in the medium. Pa(z)subscript𝑃𝑎𝑧P_{a}(z)italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z ) is the splitting function for aa+g𝑎𝑎𝑔a\rightarrow a+gitalic_a → italic_a + italic_g, and τf=2Ez(1z)/(k2+z2M2)subscript𝜏𝑓2𝐸𝑧1𝑧subscriptsuperscript𝑘2perpendicular-tosuperscript𝑧2superscript𝑀2\tau_{f}=2Ez(1-z)/(k^{2}_{\perp}+z^{2}M^{2})italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2 italic_E italic_z ( 1 - italic_z ) / ( italic_k start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟂ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is the formation time of the radiated gluon Luo et al. (2018). In LBT model, recoiled medium partons are also transported according to the Boltzmann equation, the same as jet shower partons, going through further elastic and inelastic scattering once they are produced. The depletion of the medium due to back-reaction is also taken into account through “negative” partons whose energy and momentum must be subtracted from the final observables. Recoil and “negative” partons are generally referred to as medium-response.

In this study, we employ the multi-phase transport (AMPT) model Lin et al. (2005) to generate the initial energy density distribution and collision geometry. These include the distribution of binary collisions Ncollsubscript𝑁collN_{\rm coll}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_coll end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which is used to determine the initial positions of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production, as well as the initial energy density distribution that serves as the initial condition for CLVisc 3+1D viscous hydrodynamic evolution Pang et al. (2012, 2018) of the bulk QGP medium. PYTHIA 8 Sjostrand et al. (2006, 2008) is utilized to generate the momenta of the initial jet shower partons in γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet events. The LBT model is then employed to describe the propagation and transport of the jet shower partons inside the QGP medium whose evolution is provided by the CLVisc hydrodynamics with the initial condition given by the AMPT model. The information on local temperature and fluid four-velocity from the CLVisc hydrodynamics is used in LBT to determine the elastic and inelastic scattering rates. The initial time and freeze-out temperature in CLVisc hydrodynamics are set to τ0=0.2subscript𝜏00.2\tau_{0}=0.2italic_τ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.2 fm/c and Tf=137subscript𝑇𝑓137T_{f}=137italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 137 MeV, respectively, which also determine the beginning and end of the parton-medium interaction. We use the FastJet package (Cacciari et al., 2012; Cacciari and Salam, 2006) with the anti-ktsubscript𝑘𝑡k_{t}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT jet algorithm to reconstruct full jets using the partonic information of the final jets.

The jet shape is defined as the probability density of transverse momentum distribution inside a jet cone Sirunyan et al. (2019); Luo et al. (2018),

ρ(r)=1ΔriNjetpTi(r12Δr,r+12Δr)iNjetpTi(0,R),𝜌𝑟1Δ𝑟superscriptsubscript𝑖subscript𝑁jetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝑖𝑟12Δ𝑟𝑟12Δ𝑟superscriptsubscript𝑖subscript𝑁jetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝑖0𝑅\rho(r)=\frac{1}{\Delta r}\frac{\sum_{i}^{N_{\rm jet}}p_{T}^{i}(r-\frac{1}{2}% \Delta r,r+\frac{1}{2}\Delta r)}{\sum_{i}^{N_{\rm jet}}p_{T}^{i}(0,R)},italic_ρ ( italic_r ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG roman_Δ italic_r end_ARG divide start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG roman_Δ italic_r , italic_r + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG roman_Δ italic_r ) end_ARG start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 , italic_R ) end_ARG , (4)

calculated from the parton distribution inside the reconstructed jets, where the distance r𝑟ritalic_r between the track partons and the jet axis is defined as r=(ηηjet)2+(ϕϕjet)2𝑟superscript𝜂subscript𝜂jet2superscriptitalic-ϕsubscriptitalic-ϕjet2r=\sqrt{\left(\eta-\eta_{\rm jet}\right)^{2}+\left(\phi-\phi_{\rm jet}\right)^% {2}}italic_r = square-root start_ARG ( italic_η - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_ϕ - italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG in the plane of pseudo-rapidity η𝜂\etaitalic_η and azimuthal angle ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ. The total energy from the i𝑖iitalic_i-th jet in the circular annulus with inner radius r1=rΔr/2subscript𝑟1𝑟Δ𝑟2r_{1}=r-\Delta r/2italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_r - roman_Δ italic_r / 2 and outer radius r2=r+Δr/2subscript𝑟2𝑟Δ𝑟2r_{2}=r+\Delta r/2italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_r + roman_Δ italic_r / 2 is defined as pTi(r1,r2)=assocΔrpTassocsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝑖subscript𝑟1subscript𝑟2subscriptassocΔ𝑟superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇assocp_{T}^{i}(r_{1},r_{2})=\sum_{{\rm assoc}\in\Delta r}p_{T}^{\rm assoc}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_assoc ∈ roman_Δ italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_assoc end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT where Δr=r2r1Δ𝑟subscript𝑟2subscript𝑟1\Delta r=r_{2}-r_{1}roman_Δ italic_r = italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the width of the annulus. Additionally, the total energy inside the jet cone with a radius R𝑅Ritalic_R for the i𝑖iitalic_i-th jet is given by pTi(0,R)superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝑖0𝑅p_{T}^{i}(0,R)italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 , italic_R ). The summation is over the total number of jet Njetsubscript𝑁jetN_{\rm jet}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT analyzed.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) The ratio of the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet shape between 0-10% Pb+Pb and p+p collisions as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV, from LBT calculations (red-solid) as compared with the CMS data (black-squares) Sirunyan et al. (2019).

In the following calculations, we select the trigger photon with pTγ>superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾absentp_{T}^{\gamma}>italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c𝑐citalic_c in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. The cone size of the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-triggered jets is set as R=0.3𝑅0.3R=0.3italic_R = 0.3, and the lower threshold of transverse momentum for the jets is set at pTjet>30superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jet30p_{T}^{\rm jet}>30italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 30 GeV/c, with associated partons selected with pTassoc>1superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇assoc1p_{T}^{\rm assoc}>1italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_assoc end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 1 GeV/c𝑐citalic_c. The pseudorapidities for the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ and jets are constrained within |ηγ|<1.44subscript𝜂𝛾1.44|\eta_{\gamma}|<1.44| italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | < 1.44 and |ηjet|<1.6subscript𝜂jet1.6|\eta_{\rm jet}|<1.6| italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | < 1.6, and their azimuthal angle differences |Δϕjγ|Δsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑗𝛾|\Delta\phi_{j\gamma}|| roman_Δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | are restricted to be larger than (7/8)π78𝜋(7/8)\pi( 7 / 8 ) italic_π.

Shown in Fig. 1 is the ratio of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet shape in 0-10% Pb+Pb over that in p+p collisions as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r from the LBT model simulations as compared with the CMS data Sirunyan et al. (2019). The LBT result is in good agreement with experimental data. The numerical ratio indicates an enhancement at large r region, suggesting that a significant fraction of the transverse momentum is transported to larger angles with respect to the jet axis in Pb+Pb relative to p+p collisions. This is partially due to radiated gluons, but most of the enhancement is caused by jet-induced medium response at large angles Luo et al. (2018). This medium modification of the jet shape can also be described by the coupled LBT hydro model Chen et al. (2018); Yang et al. (2021, 2023b) where the soft mode of jet-induced medium-response is modeled through hydrodynamics that couples to the Boltzmann transport of hard partons.

III Transverse and longitudinal jet tomography of heavy-ion collisions

The path-length dependence of the parton energy loss during the jet propagation within the QGP medium can be utilized to localize the initial jet production positions along the longitudinal direction, a technique known as longitudinal jet tomography Zhang et al. (2009). Additionally, non-zero spatial gradients of the parton transport coefficient q^^𝑞\hat{q}over^ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG perpendicular to their propagation directions arise due to temperature gradients in the QGP fireball. Parton propagation in such a non-uniform medium leads to an asymmetrical transverse momentum distribution He et al. (2020); Fu et al. (2023); Barata et al. (2023b, c) of final state hadrons. In a class of events with a given transverse asymmetry, a jet observable defined to characterize the asymmetric transverse momentum distribution of hadrons or partons inside a jet, the distribution of the initial jet transverse positions is found localized in a region with a corresponding transverse gradient of the jet transport coefficient. The average transverse position of the initial jet production has a monotonic dependence on the transverse asymmetry, therefore, enabling transverse jet tomography. By considering both longitudinal and transverse jet tomography, one is able to localize the jet production positions in the transverse plane, resulting in a 2D jet tomography Yang et al. (2021, 2023a).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) Illustration of the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet configuration relative to the event plane and the azimuthal angle distribution of the jet shape inside the jet cone.

In our study here, we consider the event plane along the x𝑥xitalic_x-axis and select the direction of the trigger photon to be along the negative x𝑥xitalic_x-axis, while the correlated jets propagate approximately along the positive x𝑥xitalic_x-axis as illustrated in Fig. 2. The asymmetry ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT used for transverse jet tomography is defined as He et al. (2020),

ANn=ad3rd3kfa(k,r)Sign(kn)ad3rd3kfa(k,r),superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛subscript𝑎superscript𝑑3𝑟superscript𝑑3𝑘subscript𝑓𝑎𝑘𝑟Sign𝑘𝑛subscript𝑎superscript𝑑3𝑟superscript𝑑3𝑘subscript𝑓𝑎𝑘𝑟A_{N}^{\vec{n}}=\frac{\sum_{a}\int d^{3}rd^{3}kf_{a}\left(\vec{k},\vec{r}% \right){\rm Sign}\left(\vec{k}\cdot\vec{n}\right)}{\sum_{a}\int d^{3}rd^{3}kf_% {a}\left(\vec{k},\vec{r}\right)},italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ) roman_Sign ( over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG ⋅ over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG ) end_ARG start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ) end_ARG , (5)

where fasubscript𝑓𝑎f_{a}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represents the phase-space distribution of partons (hadrons), n𝑛\vec{n}over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG denotes the normal direction of plane defined by the beam direction and the direction of the trigger particle, which is the same as the positive y𝑦yitalic_y-axis in our set-up in Fig. 2. The summation is over all partons (hadrons) inside a jet.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online). The γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rates 1/Nd2N/dxdy1𝑁superscript𝑑2𝑁𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦1/Nd^{2}N/dxdy1 / italic_N italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N / italic_d italic_x italic_d italic_y as a function of initial jet production positions (x𝑥xitalic_x, y𝑦yitalic_y) in the transverse plane in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, selected with 6 different ranges of transverse asymmetry, ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [-0.05, 0.05], [0.05, 0.15], [0.15, 0.25], [0.25, 0.35], [0.35, 0.45] and [0.45, 0.55] in the 6 panels, respectively. The trigger γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ is selected along the negative x𝑥xitalic_x-axis direction with pTγ>superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾absentp_{T}^{\gamma}>italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c and pTjet>superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetabsentp_{T}^{\rm jet}>italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 30 GeV/c. Other kinetic cuts are the same as in Fig. 1.

Shown in Fig. 3 are the final γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rates (1/N)d2N/dxdy1𝑁superscript𝑑2𝑁𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦(1/N)d^{2}N/dxdy( 1 / italic_N ) italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N / italic_d italic_x italic_d italic_y as a function of the initial locations (x𝑥xitalic_x, y𝑦yitalic_y) in the transverse plane in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV with different values of the jet transverse asymmetry ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The six panels, (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f), correspond to 6 different bins of the transverse asymmetry, ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [-0.05, 0.05], [0.05, 0.15], [0.15, 0.25], [0.25, 0.35], [0.35, 0.45] and [0.45, 0.55], respectively. As we can see from the numerical results, the typical initial jet production transverse position (y𝑦yitalic_y) shifts from the center to the outer region of the medium when ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (or ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) is increased from [-0.05, 0.05] to [0.45, 0.55]. For small values of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets originate from the center region and jets have to traverse the whole volume of the QGP as depicted in panel (a). Conversely, for large values of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets emerge from surface areas of the QGP and jets propagate tangentially to the medium surface, as shown in panel (f).

It is worth noting that the selected jet production positions also exhibit an asymmetric distribution along the x-axis. This is attributed to the path length dependence of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the parton energy loss and the azimuthal angle restriction. The path-length dependence of the parton energy loss biases the initial production position of the selected jets closer to the surface (positive x𝑥xitalic_x values). The probability to have a smaller value of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with a longer path length is also rare as compared to a shorter path length. Additionally, longer path lengths may result in a larger drift of the jet direction, outside the azimuthal cut-off |Δϕjγ|<(7/8)πΔsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑗𝛾78𝜋|\Delta\phi_{j\gamma}|<(7/8)\pi| roman_Δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | < ( 7 / 8 ) italic_π.

The integration of the initial γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rates along the x𝑥xitalic_x-axis for different selected transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT projects the 2-dimensional γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet rate onto the y𝑦yitalic_y-axis, as shown in Fig. 4. It is clear from this figure that the peak of the transverse distribution of the initial jet production position shifts towards large values of y𝑦yitalic_y with increased value of the transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The variance appears to be similar across different ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ranges. The shape of the approximately asymmetric distribution (1/N)dN/dy1𝑁𝑑𝑁𝑑𝑦(1/N)dN/dy( 1 / italic_N ) italic_d italic_N / italic_d italic_y does not change significantly when ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT varies between 0 and 0.35, corresponding to the central regions of QGP. However, the transverse distribution becomes more asymmetric for large ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT because of the surface bias by the path-length dependence of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (Color online) The γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rates 1/NdN/dy1𝑁𝑑𝑁𝑑𝑦1/NdN/dy1 / italic_N italic_d italic_N / italic_d italic_y as a function of the initial jet production position y𝑦yitalic_y, selected with different asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The kinematic cuts are the same as in Fig. 3.

For the purpose of an illustration, one can also select the initial transverse jet production positions of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets and calculate the corresponding distribution of the transverse asymmetry. Fig. 5 shows the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rates (1/N)dN/dANy1𝑁𝑑𝑁𝑑superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦(1/N)dN/dA_{N}^{y}( 1 / italic_N ) italic_d italic_N / italic_d italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as a function of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with given bins of y𝑦yitalic_y coordinate of the initial jet production. With given initial bins of y𝑦yitalic_y ranging from y𝑦yitalic_y = [-0.5, 0.5] fm to [4.5, 5.5] fm, the peak of the distribution shifts from small to large ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values. In summary, according to Figs. 4 and 5, the transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT of the final state particles inside a jet does localize the initial transverse positions of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: (Color online) The γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rates 1/NdN/dANy1𝑁𝑑𝑁𝑑superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦1/NdN/dA_{N}^{y}1 / italic_N italic_d italic_N / italic_d italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as a function of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, with given initial jet production position y𝑦yitalic_y. The corresponding cuts are the same as in Fig. 3.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: (Color online). (Upper) The γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rates 1/Nd2N/dxdy1𝑁superscript𝑑2𝑁𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦1/Nd^{2}N/dxdy1 / italic_N italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N / italic_d italic_x italic_d italic_y as a function of initial jet production locations (x𝑥xitalic_x, y𝑦yitalic_y) in the transverse plane in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, selected with 3 different jet transverse momentum, pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [15, 30] GeV/c, [30, 60] GeV/c and pTjet>superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetabsentp_{T}^{\rm jet}>italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c, respectively. These jets are triggered by photons with transverse momentum pTγ>superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾absentp_{T}^{\gamma}>italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c. Other cuts are the same as in Fig. 3. (Lower) The corresponding projections onto the x𝑥xitalic_x-axis.

To illustrate the power of longitudinal jet tomography in localizing the initial jet production positions, we show in the upper panels of Fig. 6 the contour distributions of the initial γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rates (1/N)d2N/dxdy1𝑁superscript𝑑2𝑁𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦(1/N)d^{2}N/dxdy( 1 / italic_N ) italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N / italic_d italic_x italic_d italic_y in the transverse plane (x𝑥xitalic_x, y𝑦yitalic_y) for different jet transverse momentum (a) pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [15, 30] GeV/c𝑐citalic_c, (b) pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [30, 60] GeV/c𝑐citalic_c and (c) pTjet>superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetabsentp_{T}^{\rm jet}>italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c𝑐citalic_c, respectively, for direct photons with the transverse momentum pTγ>60superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾60p_{T}^{\gamma}>60italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c𝑐citalic_c. The lower panels give the corresponding projections onto the x𝑥xitalic_x-axis, (1/N)dN/dx=(1/N)𝑑y(d2N/dxdy)1𝑁𝑑𝑁𝑑𝑥1𝑁differential-d𝑦superscript𝑑2𝑁𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦(1/N)dN/dx=(1/N)\int dy(d^{2}N/dxdy)( 1 / italic_N ) italic_d italic_N / italic_d italic_x = ( 1 / italic_N ) ∫ italic_d italic_y ( italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N / italic_d italic_x italic_d italic_y ). For fixed photon transverse momentum pTγsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾p_{T}^{\gamma}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, a higher value of pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT indicates less jet energy loss due to a shorter path-length of jet propagation. Conversely, smaller pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT corresponds to larger jet energy loss and longer path-length. This is indeed seen in Fig. 6: γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets with smaller pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are primarily produced through volume emissions that undergo long path lengths and have significant energy loss, while γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets with larger pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are mainly produced through surface emissions with shorter path lengths and less energy loss. Varying pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT while kee** pTγsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾p_{T}^{\gamma}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT fixed thus provides a method to approximately localize the initial γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production locations in the longitudinal direction along the jet path.

IV Jet shape modification with jet tomography

In this section, we investigate the modification of jet shape for γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets produced in different regions of the QGP fireball as selected by jet tomography. During the jet propagation, hard partons tend to penetrate the dilute region of the medium with low gluon density, while soft recoil partons are more likely to be created in the dense region with high gluon density. By localizing γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets to different regions, we can study the modification of jet shape for jets with different path lengths and temperature gradients. In particular, temperature gradients along the direction perpendicular to the jet propagation may lead to an asymmetric jet shape. We will employ transverse tomography, longitudinal tomography, and a combination of these two methods, namely 2D-tomography, to localize γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets in the transverse plane. The kinetic cuts used in this section remain the same as before.

IV.1 Jet shapes selected with transverse tomography

We first consider jet events selected with the transverse jet tomography and examine the corresponding modification of the jet shape. Shown in Fig. 7 are (a) the jet shape as a function of the radius r𝑟ritalic_r in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions (solid curves), for γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets selected with different ranges of the transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT from [-0.05, 0.05] to [0.65, 0.75], as compared to the jet shape in p+p collisions (dashed line) at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV, and (b) the ratios of jet shapes in Pb+Pb and p+p collisions. In both Pb+Pb and p+p collisions, the jet shape decreases monotonically with the radius r𝑟ritalic_r, indicating that most of the jet energy is concentrated in the core region close to the jet axis. However, the jet shape in Pb+Pb is in general broader than that in p+p collisions. This suggests that some fraction of the transverse momentum lost by hard partons at the core of the jet is transported to large angles by soft partons (radiated gluons and medium response) with respect to the jet axis in Pb+Pb relative to p+p collisions. Furthermore, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets selected with smaller transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT exhibit a broader jet shape, indicating that the path length is longer and quenching effect is stronger for jets produced in the central region of QGP as localized by smaller values of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. According to the picture we have illustrated in the last section, increasing ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT will shift the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production positions toward the outer region of QGP. This will reduce the jet energy loss and jet quenching effect with smaller broadening of the jet shape. Therefore, the width of the jet shape in Pb+Pb collisions decreases monotonically as the values of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT increase.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: (Color online) (a) Jet shape of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r in 0-10% Pb+Pb (solid curves) selected with different ranges of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and p+p (dashing curve) collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. (b) Ratios of jet shapes in Pb+Pb over p+p collisions as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r.

For theoretical illustrations, we also show in Fig. 8 the jet shape modification of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets selected according to their transverse coordinates y𝑦yitalic_y which shows similar trends for the corresponding ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT dependence of the modification in Fig. 7.

The broadening of jet shape is caused by interaction between the jet and the medium, in which hard partons at the core of a jet lose energy leading to a slight suppression of the jet shape at the core r<0.05𝑟0.05r<0.05italic_r < 0.05. This lost energy will be carried by radiated gluons and medium-response to large angles, therefore transporting the energy towards the outer layer of the jet cone and leading to the enhancement of the jet shape in large r𝑟ritalic_r regions. Selection of jet events with different values of the transverse asymmetry localizes the transverse positions of the initial jet production with different average path lengths and therefore different degree of jet quenching. This naturally leads to different levels of broadening of the jet shape, decreasing with increasing values of the transverse asymmetry or the average values of the transverse coordinate (y𝑦yitalic_y). This observation is also consistent with previous studies Luo et al. (2018, 2022).

Show in Fig. 9 is the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rate as a function of xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (=pTjet/pTγabsentsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾=p_{T}^{\rm jet}/p_{T}^{\gamma}= italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT), selected with different ranges of the transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, in 0-10% Pb+Pb at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. The dashed curve is the result from p+p collisions for comparison. One can see that the rate in Pb+Pb shifts toward smaller xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relative to p+p collisions due to jet quenching. The shift is smaller for γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets selected with a larger ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT range, indicating more bias toward surface emission. For theoretical illustrations, we also show in Fig. 10 the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production rate as a function of xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with different initial jet production positions in the y𝑦yitalic_y axis. The trend is similar to the corresponding dependence of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as shown in Fig. 9.

Although the xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distributions in Fig. 9 for different ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT selections exhibit the similar trends as in Fig. 10 for the results with different selection of the initial production position in the y𝑦yitalic_y axis, the xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distribution in Pb+Pb is observed to move back to the distribution in p+p collisions only when ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is sufficiently large. To understand these trends, we also show in Fig. 11 the average path length of the leading partons Ldelimited-⟨⟩𝐿\left\langle L\right\rangle⟨ italic_L ⟩ which is defined as,

L(ANy)=𝑑x𝑑yP(x,y,ANy)l(x,y,ANy)𝑑x𝑑yP(x,y,ANy),delimited-⟨⟩𝐿superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦differential-d𝑥differential-d𝑦𝑃𝑥𝑦superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦𝑙𝑥𝑦superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦differential-d𝑥differential-d𝑦𝑃𝑥𝑦superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦\left\langle L(A_{N}^{y})\right\rangle=\frac{\int dxdyP(x,y,A_{N}^{y})l(x,y,A_% {N}^{y})}{\int dxdyP(x,y,A_{N}^{y})},⟨ italic_L ( italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ⟩ = divide start_ARG ∫ italic_d italic_x italic_d italic_y italic_P ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_l ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG start_ARG ∫ italic_d italic_x italic_d italic_y italic_P ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG , (6)

where l(x,y,ANy)𝑙𝑥𝑦superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦l(x,y,A_{N}^{y})italic_l ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is the distance between the longitudinal position of the initial jet production and the boundary of QGP, and P(x,y,ANy)𝑃𝑥𝑦superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦P(x,y,A_{N}^{y})italic_P ( italic_x , italic_y , italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is the initial jet production rates at (x,y)𝑥𝑦(x,y)( italic_x , italic_y ) for jet events with ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In the results shown in Fig. 11, we assume that the path is parallel to the x𝑥xitalic_x-axis and we take the critical temperature (Tc=165subscript𝑇𝑐165T_{c}=165italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 165 MeV) at the boundary of the QGP. The panel (a) in Fig. 11 indicates that with increasing ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, L(ANy)delimited-⟨⟩𝐿superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦\left\langle L(A_{N}^{y})\right\rangle⟨ italic_L ( italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ⟩ remains nearly unchanged, but rapidly decreases as ANsubscript𝐴𝑁A_{N}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT approaches to 1. Meanwhile, panel (b) shows that L(y)delimited-⟨⟩𝐿𝑦\left\langle L(y)\right\rangle⟨ italic_L ( italic_y ) ⟩ decreases smoothly with the initial jet production position y𝑦yitalic_y. Since the modification of the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distributions is controlled mainly by jet energy loss which in turn is controlled by the jet path length, Fig. 11 explains why modification of xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distribution is similar across most of the ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT range where the average path length is insensitive to ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. It reverts back to the distribution in p+p collisions only when ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is sufficiently large.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 8: (Color online) (a) Jet shape of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r in 0-10% Pb+Pb (solid curves) selected with different initial production position y𝑦yitalic_y and p+p (dashing curve) collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. (b) Ratios of jet shapes in Pb+Pb over p+p collisions as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r.
Refer to caption
Figure 9: (Color online) xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distribution, with γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets selected with different ranges of the transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, in in 0-10% Pb+Pb (solid line) and p+p (dashing line) collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: (Color online) xJγsubscript𝑥𝐽𝛾x_{J\gamma}italic_x start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distribution, with γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets selected with different ranges of the transverse coordinates y, in 0-10% Pb+Pb (solid line) and p+p (dashing line) collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV.
Refer to caption
Figure 11: (Color online) Average propagating path length of the leading jet partons as a function of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (left) and as a function of initial production transverse position y𝑦yitalic_y (right).

IV.2 Jet shapes selected with longitudinal tomography

In the previous subsection, we have seen how selecting different values of the transverse asymmetry ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT localizes the initial transverse position (y𝑦yitalic_y) and leads to different jet propagation path length and jet shape broadening. Alternatively, one can directly vary the jet propagation path length using longitudinal jet tomography, as illustrated in Fig. 6.

Shown in Fig. 12 are (a) the jet shapes as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r for γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets in 0-10% Pb+Pb and p+p collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV, with different pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (b) the ratio of jet shapes between Pb+Pb and p+p collisions. Because of QCD branching in vacuum, the jet shape in p+p becomes broader with larger jet transverse momentum pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as we see in the figure. This energy-dependence of the vacuum jet shape can lead to jet shape broadening due to jet energy loss in Pb+Pb collisions. In addition, jet-medium interaction will also broaden the jet shape because of radiated gluons and medium-response at large angles. This medium-induced jet shape broadening will also depend on pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT because of the path-length bias imposed by the longitudinal jet tomography.

As we have seen in Fig. 6, for given values of the photon transverse momentum pTγsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾p_{T}^{\gamma}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets with small final pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT normally comes from jets initially produced at the center of QGP that have gone through a along path length and lost significant amount of energy. One should also see large broadening of the jet shapes. On the other hand, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets with large pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT are more likely produced initially close to the surface of QGP, travel a shorter path length and lose less energy. The corresponding jet shape broadening is also smaller as we see in Fig. 12.

It is worth noting again that γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets with the same final pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in Pb+Pb collisions usually come from initial jets with higher transverse momentum than in p+p collisions due to jet energy loss. This energy loss alone can lead to jet shape broadening due to energy-dependence of the jet shape in vacuum. Such jet shape broadening due to jet energy-loss is approximately independent of the final jet energy pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as we see in the LBT results for r<0.2𝑟0.2r<0.2italic_r < 0.2. At large radius r>0.22𝑟0.22r>0.22italic_r > 0.22, the jet shape broadening due to radiated gluons and medium-response strongly depends on pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT due to path-length bias imposed by the longitudinal jet tomography.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: (Color online) Upper panel: the jet shape as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r, selected with different jet transverse momentum, pTjet<30superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jet30p_{T}^{\rm jet}<30italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < 30 GeV/c, 30<pTjet<6030superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jet6030<p_{T}^{\rm jet}<6030 < italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT < 60 GeV/c and pTjet>60superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jet60p_{T}^{\rm jet}>60italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c in in 0-10% Pb+Pb and p+p collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV, respectively. The transverse momentum of the trigger photon is pTγ>60superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾60p_{T}^{\gamma}>60italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c. Lower panel: the ratio of jet shapes between Pb+Pb and p+p collisions. Other kinematic cuts are the same as in Fig. 7.

IV.3 Jet shapes selected with 2D tomography

One can combine transverse and longitudinal jet tomography, or 2D jet tomography to study the jet shape modification in Pb+Pb collisions by simultaneously selecting both final jet pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. We select trigger photons with pTγ>60superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾60p_{T}^{\gamma}>60italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c𝑐citalic_c along the negative x𝑥xitalic_x-axis direction. We calculate the jet shape of the correlated jets with two intervals of transverse momentum: small pTjet=[15,30]superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jet1530p_{T}^{\rm jet}=[15,30]italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ 15 , 30 ] GeV and large pTjet>60superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jet60p_{T}^{\rm jet}>60italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV. In addition, we require the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets have small ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [-0.05, 0.05] and large transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [0.55, 0.65].

Refer to caption
Figure 13: (Color online) Similar to Fig. 12, but simultaneously selected with the two final observables, pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [15, 30] GeV/c and ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [-0.05, 0.05], pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [15, 30] GeV/c and ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [0.55, 0.65], pTjet>60superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jet60p_{T}^{\rm jet}>60italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c and ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [-0.05, 0.05], pTjet>60superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jet60p_{T}^{\rm jet}>60italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 60 GeV/c and ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [0.55, 0.65], respectively.

The jet shapes of these γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets and their corresponding ratios between 0-10% Pb+Pb and p+p collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV are shown Fig. 13 for four different combinations of transverse and longitudinal tomographic selections. Among these four sets of tomographic selected configurations, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets with small pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in conjunction with small ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT have the most broadened jet shapes, since these jets are produced at the central region of QGP and traverse the longest path length on the average. Conversely, the configurations that have the least jet shape broadening are those γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets with large values of both pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, that are initially produced in the outer region of QGP and travel a smaller path-length. If the γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets are selected with small pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and large ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, or large pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and small ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the medium modification of the jet shape falls between the above two extreme cases as seen in Figure 13.

V Asymmetric jet shapes

Refer to caption
Figure 14: (Color online) Comparisons of ρuppersubscript𝜌𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑟\rho_{upper}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u italic_p italic_p italic_e italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (red dash-dotted) and ρlowersubscript𝜌𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟\rho_{lower}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_o italic_w italic_e italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (blue dashed ) as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV, with different given y𝑦yitalic_y positions of the initial jet production. Other cuts are the same as in Fig. 3.

The dependence of the jet shape modification on variables defined in different types of tomography methods in the last section is essentially the manifestation of the path-length dependence of jet-medium interaction and the associated medium response. We will study in this section the jet shape modification specifically caused by the gradient of the parton density or the jet transport coefficient q^^𝑞\hat{q}over^ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG and the radial flow. We will look at the azimuthal angle distribution of energy density inside the jet cone relative to the direction of the transverse gradient of the QGP medium. We consider the same γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet configurations relative to the event plane of heavy-ion collisions as illustrated in Fig 2. Because of the gradient of the medium density and the radial flow, both final jet partons and medium-response distribution will be asymmetric relative to the direction of the gradient.

For a purely theoretical illustration, we first divide the jet cone into two equal halves using a plane defined by the beam direction and the direction of the jet axis as shown in Fig 2. We then calculate the jet shapes as a function of the radius r𝑟ritalic_r for each half cone - one for the upper half and another for the lower half,

ρ(r)upper/lower=1ΔriNjetpTi(rΔr2,r+Δr2)Θ(±kn)iNjetpTi(0,R),𝜌subscript𝑟upperlower1Δ𝑟superscriptsubscript𝑖subscript𝑁jetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝑖𝑟Δ𝑟2𝑟Δ𝑟2Θplus-or-minus𝑘𝑛superscriptsubscript𝑖subscript𝑁jetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝑖0𝑅\displaystyle\rho(r)_{\rm upper/lower}=\frac{1}{\Delta r}\frac{\sum_{i}^{N_{% \rm jet}}p_{T}^{i}(r-\frac{\Delta r}{2},r+\frac{\Delta r}{2})\Theta(\pm\vec{k}% \cdot\vec{n})}{\sum_{i}^{N_{\rm jet}}p_{T}^{i}(0,R)},italic_ρ ( italic_r ) start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_upper / roman_lower end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG roman_Δ italic_r end_ARG divide start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_r - divide start_ARG roman_Δ italic_r end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG , italic_r + divide start_ARG roman_Δ italic_r end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) roman_Θ ( ± over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG ⋅ over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG ) end_ARG start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 0 , italic_R ) end_ARG , (7)

where ±plus-or-minus\pm± in the ΘΘ\Thetaroman_Θ function selects associated particles in the upper half and lower half of the jet cone, respectively, k𝑘\vec{k}over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG is the momentum of the associated particle and n𝑛\vec{n}over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG is the norm of the plane defined by the beam direction and the momentum of this jet, which coincides with the event plane in our setup.

Shown in Fig. 14 are the upper (red dash-dotted), lower half (blue dashed), and the total jet shape (black solid line) for γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets initially produced in 6 different regions of the transverse coordinate y𝑦yitalic_y in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. For jets produced in the central region of the QGP with y𝑦yitalic_y = [-0.5, 0.5] fm, the upper and lower jet shapes are almost identical, while jets produced near the system edge with y𝑦yitalic_y = [4.5, 5.5] fm have a broader lower-half jet shape as compared to the upper-half due to the asymmetric parton transport of jet partons and medium response in the non-uniform QGP medium.

We also plot the ratio between ρlowersubscript𝜌lower\rho_{\rm lower}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_lower end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ρuppersubscript𝜌upper\rho_{\rm upper}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_upper end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Fig. 15 as a function of the radius r𝑟ritalic_r for jets initially produced in different regions of the QGP. It is clear that the lower-half jet shape is suppressed at the core of the jet cone but enhanced toward the edge of the jet cone as compared to the upper-half jet shape. Since the jet core is made up of the energetic jet partons, their diffusion in the transverse direction is enhanced toward the dilute region of the QGP medium (opposite direction of the transverse gradient dq^/dy𝑑^𝑞𝑑𝑦d\hat{q}/dyitalic_d over^ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG / italic_d italic_y) leading to the positive value of the transverse asymmetry AN(y)subscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}(y)italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_y ) and the suppression of ρlowersubscript𝜌lower\rho_{\rm lower}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_lower end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relative to ρuppersubscript𝜌upper\rho_{\rm upper}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_upper end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at the core of the jet cone. Jet-induced medium response in the same jet event will compensate such transport of momentum in the transverse direction and flow in the opposite direction of the transverse diffusion of hard jet partons (along the direction of the transverse gradient dq^/dy𝑑^𝑞𝑑𝑦d\hat{q}/dyitalic_d over^ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG / italic_d italic_y). This therefore contributes to the enhancement of the lower-half jet shape ρlowersubscript𝜌lower\rho_{\rm lower}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_lower end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relative the upper-half ρuppersubscript𝜌upper\rho_{\rm upper}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_upper end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the large radius region where medium response dominate. The difference between ρlowersubscript𝜌lower\rho_{\rm lower}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_lower end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ρuppersubscript𝜌upper\rho_{\rm upper}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_upper end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is more pronounced for jets produced in the outer region of the QGP where the gradient of q^^𝑞\hat{q}over^ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG increases toward edge due to the initial energy density distribution of the hot matter.

Refer to caption
Figure 15: (Color online) The ratio of ρlowersubscript𝜌lower\rho_{\rm lower}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_lower end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over ρuppersubscript𝜌upper\rho_{\rm upper}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_upper end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as a function of r𝑟ritalic_r. Kinematic selections and cuts are the same as in Fig. 14.
Refer to caption
Figure 16: (Color online) The in-cone transverse momentum distribution as a function of ΔϕΔitalic-ϕ\Delta\phiroman_Δ italic_ϕ and ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η in 0-10% Pb+Pb𝑃𝑏𝑃𝑏Pb+Pbitalic_P italic_b + italic_P italic_b collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV with ANy=[0.55,0.65]superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦0.550.65A_{N}^{y}=[0.55,0.65]italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ 0.55 , 0.65 ]. Kinematic selections and cuts are the same as in Fig. 3.

Note that in experiments one can only statistically localize the transverse region of the initial jet production according to the value of the jet transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. However, fluctuations of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT make it difficult to determine the transverse location precisely in each event, especially for small values of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as seen in Fig. 5. In order to observe the asymmetric jet shape as we have illustrated in the about theoretical study, we introduce a two-dimensional r𝑟ritalic_r-weighted jet shape ρ~2D(Δη,Δϕ)subscript~𝜌2𝐷Δ𝜂Δitalic-ϕ\tilde{\rho}_{2D}(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi)over~ start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_ϕ ) for the transverse momentum distributions inside the jet cone in the ΔηΔϕΔ𝜂Δitalic-ϕ\Delta\eta-\Delta\phiroman_Δ italic_η - roman_Δ italic_ϕ plane,

ρ~2D(Δη,Δϕ)subscript~𝜌2𝐷Δ𝜂Δitalic-ϕ\displaystyle\tilde{\rho}_{2D}(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi)over~ start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_ϕ ) =1δηδϕabsent1𝛿𝜂𝛿italic-ϕ\displaystyle=\frac{1}{\delta\eta\delta\phi}= divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_δ italic_η italic_δ italic_ϕ end_ARG
jet(Δη,Δϕ)(Δη+δη,Δϕ+δϕ)ripTi/pTjetjetri<RripTi/pTjet,subscriptjetsuperscriptsubscriptΔ𝜂Δitalic-ϕΔ𝜂𝛿𝜂Δitalic-ϕ𝛿italic-ϕsubscript𝑟𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇isuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetsubscriptjetsubscriptsubscript𝑟𝑖𝑅subscript𝑟𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇isuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jet\displaystyle\frac{\sum_{\rm jet}\sum_{(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi)}^{(\Delta\eta+% \delta\eta,\Delta\phi+\delta\phi)}r_{i}p_{T}^{\rm i}/p_{T}^{\rm jet}}{\sum_{% \rm jet}\sum_{r_{i}<R}r_{i}p_{T}^{\rm i}/p_{T}^{\rm jet}},divide start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_ϕ ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η + italic_δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_ϕ + italic_δ italic_ϕ ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_R end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (8)

where ri=Δη2+Δϕ2subscript𝑟𝑖Δsuperscript𝜂2Δsuperscriptitalic-ϕ2r_{i}=\sqrt{\Delta\eta^{2}+\Delta\phi^{2}}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG roman_Δ italic_η start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + roman_Δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG is the distance between the i𝑖iitalic_i-th associated parton and the jet axis, pTisuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇ip_{T}^{\rm i}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the transverse momentum of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th associated parton, Δη=ηiηjetΔ𝜂subscript𝜂𝑖subscript𝜂𝑗𝑒𝑡\Delta\eta=\eta_{i}-\eta_{jet}roman_Δ italic_η = italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_e italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Δϕ=ϕiϕjetΔitalic-ϕsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑖subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑗𝑒𝑡\Delta\phi=\phi_{i}-\phi_{jet}roman_Δ italic_ϕ = italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j italic_e italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the δη𝛿𝜂\delta\etaitalic_δ italic_η and δϕ𝛿italic-ϕ\delta\phiitalic_δ italic_ϕ are the bin sizes in the ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η and ΔϕΔitalic-ϕ\Delta\phiroman_Δ italic_ϕ directions, respectively. The 2-D jet profile is weighted with the distance r𝑟ritalic_r to enhance the contribution of soft partons in the large r𝑟ritalic_r region from medium response.

The 2D jet shape ρ~2D(Δη,Δϕ)subscript~𝜌2𝐷Δ𝜂Δitalic-ϕ\tilde{\rho}_{2D}(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi)over~ start_ARG italic_ρ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_ϕ ) inside the jet cone is shown in Fig. 16, for γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.025.025.025.02 TeV, with ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in the range [0.55,0.65]0.550.65[0.55,0.65][ 0.55 , 0.65 ]. The contribution from the leading hard jet parton to the 2-D jet profile at the core is shown in the inset, while the remaining contribution (with the leading parton subtracted) primarily from soft particles to the 2D jet profile inside the jet cone is displayed in the main figure. This 2D jet shape with given transverse asymmetry indeed shows the same asymmetrical structure as we have discussed in the above study with specified region of transverse position of the initial jet production. The hard jet partons are diffused toward the dilute region of the QGP medium while soft partons from the medium response tend to move to the direction of the dense region of the QGP. In other words, the asymmetric jet shape suggests that hard partons inside the jet are deflected away from dense regions, while soft partons from medium response are more likely to be created in dense regions. This asymmetrical behavior is particularly more pronounced for γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet events with large ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where the jet is produced mostly in the outer layer of the medium, and is tangential to the surface.

Refer to caption
Figure 17: (Color online) The in-cone transverse momentum distribution as a function of ϕrsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟\phi_{r}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in three different circular regions inside γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets in 0-10% Pb+Pb𝑃𝑏𝑃𝑏Pb+Pbitalic_P italic_b + italic_P italic_b collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. Three kinds of jet events are selected with different ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values in panels (a), (b), and (c), respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 18: (Color online) The in-cone transverse momentum distribution as a function of ϕrsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟\phi_{r}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in three different pTassocsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇assocp_{T}^{\rm assoc}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_assoc end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ranges in 0-10% Pb+Pb𝑃𝑏𝑃𝑏Pb+Pbitalic_P italic_b + italic_P italic_b collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV. Three kinds of jet events are selected with different ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values in panels (a), (b), and (c), respectively.

To further illustrate the asymmetrical jet shape and the underlying contributions from hard and soft particles, we project the 2D jet shape to the azimuthal angle distribution inside the jet cone,

d𝒫Tdϕr=1Njetjetϕrϕr+ΔϕrripTiΔϕr,𝑑subscript𝒫𝑇𝑑subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟1subscript𝑁jetsubscriptjetsuperscriptsubscriptsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟Δsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟subscript𝑟𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇iΔsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟\displaystyle\frac{d{\cal P}_{T}}{d\phi_{r}}=\frac{1}{N_{\rm jet}}\frac{\sum_{% \rm jet}\sum_{\phi_{r}}^{\phi_{r}+\Delta\phi_{r}}r_{i}\cdot p_{T}^{\rm i}}{% \Delta\phi_{r}},divide start_ARG italic_d caligraphic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋅ italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Δ italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , (9)

where Njetsubscript𝑁jetN_{\rm jet}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the total number of jet events, and ϕrsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟\phi_{r}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the azimuthal angle in the ΔηΔϕΔ𝜂Δitalic-ϕ\Delta\eta-\Delta\phiroman_Δ italic_η - roman_Δ italic_ϕ plane,

{ϕr=arcsin(Δηr),(Δϕ0)ϕr=πarcsin(Δηr),(Δϕ<0,Δη0)ϕr=πarcsin(Δηr),(Δϕ<0,Δη<0).casessubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟absentΔ𝜂𝑟Δitalic-ϕ0subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟absent𝜋Δ𝜂𝑟formulae-sequenceΔitalic-ϕ0Δ𝜂0subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟absent𝜋Δ𝜂𝑟formulae-sequenceΔitalic-ϕ0Δ𝜂0𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑤𝑖𝑠𝑒\displaystyle\begin{cases}\begin{aligned} \phi_{r}&=\arcsin{\left(\frac{\Delta% \eta}{r}\right)},&(\Delta\phi\geqslant 0)\\[5.0pt] \phi_{r}&=\pi-\arcsin{\left(\frac{\Delta\eta}{r}\right)},&(\Delta\phi<0,\Delta% \eta\geqslant 0)\\[5.0pt] \phi_{r}&=-\pi-\arcsin{\left(\frac{\Delta\eta}{r}\right)},&(\Delta\phi<0,% \Delta\eta<0).\end{aligned}\end{cases}{ start_ROW start_CELL start_ROW start_CELL italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL = roman_arcsin ( divide start_ARG roman_Δ italic_η end_ARG start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ) , end_CELL start_CELL ( roman_Δ italic_ϕ ⩾ 0 ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL = italic_π - roman_arcsin ( divide start_ARG roman_Δ italic_η end_ARG start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ) , end_CELL start_CELL ( roman_Δ italic_ϕ < 0 , roman_Δ italic_η ⩾ 0 ) end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_CELL start_CELL = - italic_π - roman_arcsin ( divide start_ARG roman_Δ italic_η end_ARG start_ARG italic_r end_ARG ) , end_CELL start_CELL ( roman_Δ italic_ϕ < 0 , roman_Δ italic_η < 0 ) . end_CELL end_ROW end_CELL start_CELL end_CELL end_ROW (10)

with ϕr=0subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟0\phi_{r}=0italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 defined as the direction of y𝑦yitalic_y or along the positive direction of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Shown in Fig. 17 are the azimuthal angle ϕrsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟\phi_{r}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distribution of transverse energy inside γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02subscript𝑠𝑁𝑁5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV with three different jet transverse asymmetry (a) ANy=[0.05,0.05]superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦0.050.05A_{N}^{y}=[-0.05,0.05]italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ - 0.05 , 0.05 ], (b) [0.25,0.35]0.250.35[0.25,0.35][ 0.25 , 0.35 ] (c) and [0.55,0.65]0.550.65[0.55,0.65][ 0.55 , 0.65 ] for three different circular annulus at radius r𝑟ritalic_r = [0, 0.1] (solid), [0.1, 0.2] (dashed) and [0.2, 0.3] (dotted), respectively. We also show in Fig. 18 the angular ϕrsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟\phi_{r}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distribution of transverse energy inside γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets with three different jet transverse asymmetry (a) ANy=[0.05,0.05]superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦0.050.05A_{N}^{y}=[-0.05,0.05]italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = [ - 0.05 , 0.05 ], (b) [0.25,0.35]0.250.35[0.25,0.35][ 0.25 , 0.35 ] (c) and [0.55,0.65]0.550.65[0.55,0.65][ 0.55 , 0.65 ], for three different regions of parton transverse momentum, pTassoc>3superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇assoc3p_{T}^{\rm assoc}>3italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_assoc end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT > 3 GeV/c (solid), 2<pTassoc32superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇assoc32<p_{T}^{\rm assoc}\leq 32 < italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_assoc end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ 3 GeV/c (dashed) and pTassoc2superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇assoc2p_{T}^{\rm assoc}\leq 2italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_assoc end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ 2 GeV/c (dotted), respectively. Soft partons originating from the medium response have smaller pTassocsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇assocp_{T}^{\rm assoc}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_assoc end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, while large pTassocsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇assocp_{T}^{\rm assoc}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_assoc end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is associated with hard partons. We observe different trends in the ϕrsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟\phi_{r}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distributions for hard and soft partons, particularly for jet events with a large value of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. This conclusion is consistent with the results presented in Fig. 17, except that different circular annuli are used to separate hard from soft partons: hard jet partons are concentrated around the core of the jet cone (r=0𝑟0r=0italic_r = 0) whereas soft partons tend to dominate the region toward the edge of the jet cone.

With small jet transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ranging from -0.05 to 0.05, the jet shape is mostly symmetric with an approximately uniform distribution in ϕrsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟\phi_{r}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at both small and large radius r𝑟ritalic_r or for both small and large transverse momentum partons as seen in Figs. 17(a) and 18(a). For jets with sizable or large transverse asymmetry ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in ranges [0.25, 0.35] or [0.55, 0.65], they propagate through regions of QGP with large transverse gradient. These jets have asymmetric jet shapes with non-uniform azimuthal ϕrsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟\phi_{r}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distributions as seen in Figs. 17(b-c) and 18(b-c). Hard jet partons at the core of the jet have a peak in the opposite direction of the gradient (ϕr=0subscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟0\phi_{r}=0italic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 toward the dilute region) while soft partons at large radius have a peak in the direction of the gradient (ϕr=πsubscriptitalic-ϕ𝑟𝜋\phi_{r}=\piitalic_ϕ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_π toward the dense region). This is consistent with the findings as illustrated in Fig. 16.

Note that in experimental measurements, one can only know the absolute value of the transverse asymmetry |ANy|superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦|A_{N}^{y}|| italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | with equal probability of positive and negative values. If one averages events with both positive and negative values of ANysuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑦A_{N}^{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the final azimuthal distribution will be uniform. To circumvent this, one should align the orientation of the hard jet (or soft) partons in each event before averaging over events. The anti-correlation of hard and soft partons in asymmetric jets serves to determine the direction of the gradient of the QGP through which the jets propagate. This is an especially useful technique to measure the asymmetric jet shape caused by the transverse gradient of the QGP medium in central heavy-ion collisions where one cannot determine the event plane from the bulk hadron distributions.

VI summary

We have investigated the medium-modified jet shapes of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets in high-energy heavy-ion collisions using a two-dimensional jet tomography that combines gradient (transverse) and longitudinal jet tomography using event-by-event linear Boltzmann Transport simulations which can reproduce CMS experimental data. Transverse and longitudinal jet tomography are demonstrated to be able to localize the initial γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jet production locations as proposed in Zhang et al. (2009) and He et al. (2020). By employing the 2D jet tomography in which γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ-jets are selected with different jet transverse asymmetry ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT or the longitudinal asymmetry pTjet/pTγsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇𝛾p_{T}^{\rm jet}/p_{T}^{\gamma}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we computed the medium modification for the transverse momentum distribution inside the jet cone, namely the jet shape. Jet shapes are in general broadened in Pb+Pb collisions relative to p+p collisions because of the energy transfer carried by soft partons in medium response at large angles relative to the jet axis. Our results indicate that jet shape broadening are enhanced in events with small values of ANnsuperscriptsubscript𝐴𝑁𝑛A_{N}^{\vec{n}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over→ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and pTjetsuperscriptsubscript𝑝𝑇jetp_{T}^{\rm jet}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_jet end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, corresponding to jets initially produced at the center of the QGP or with long path lengths. We further illustrated the asymmetrical jet shapes of these jets that propagate through regions of the QGP with finite transverse gradient. Hard jet partons at the core of the jet are defected away from the dense region of QGP while soft partons from the medium response are produced more in the dense region of QGP. This anti-correlation of hard and soft partons within the asymmetric jets can be used to determine the direction of the transverse gradient of the QGP in each jet event. These distinctive behaviors of hard and soft partons inside the jet cone may pave the way for new avenues to investigate the properties of the QGP and strong interactions. Future experimental measurements can validate these distinctive features in the jet shape, thereby testing the theory of QCD and parton transport.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Guang-You Qin, Enke Wang and Zhong Yang for stimulating discussions. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants Nos. 11935007, 11435004, 12075098, 12305140, 12147134, by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation No. 2021A1515110817, by Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research No. 2020B0301030008, Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou No. 2019050001, and the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Division of Nuclear Physics, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 and within the framework of the SURGE Collaboration, the US National Science Foundation under Grant No. OAC-2004571 within the X-SCAPE Collaboration.

References

  • Gyulassy and Plumer (1990) M. Gyulassy and M. Plumer, Phys. Lett. B 243, 432 (1990).
  • Wang and Gyulassy (1992) X.-N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1480 (1992).
  • Qin and Wang (2015) G.-Y. Qin and X.-N. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1530014 (2015), eprint 1511.00790.
  • Adare et al. (2010) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 142301 (2010), eprint 1006.3740.
  • Adler et al. (2002) C. Adler et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 202301 (2002), eprint nucl-ex/0206011.
  • Abelev et al. (2013) B. Abelev et al. (ALICE), Phys. Lett. B 719, 18 (2013), eprint 1205.5761.
  • Aad et al. (2012) G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Lett. B 707, 330 (2012), eprint 1108.6018.
  • Chatrchyan et al. (2012) S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 022301 (2012), eprint 1204.1850.
  • Sirunyan et al. (2018) A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B 776, 195 (2018), eprint 1702.00630.
  • Wang and Wang (2002) E. Wang and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 162301 (2002), eprint hep-ph/0202105.
  • Vitev (2004) I. Vitev, J. Phys. G 30, S791 (2004), eprint hep-ph/0403089.
  • Zhang et al. (2007) H. Zhang, J. F. Owens, E. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 212301 (2007), eprint nucl-th/0701045.
  • Zhang et al. (2009) H. Zhang, J. F. Owens, E. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 032302 (2009), eprint 0902.4000.
  • Vitev and Zhang (2010) I. Vitev and B.-W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 132001 (2010).
  • Qin and Muller (2011) G.-Y. Qin and B. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 162302 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 108, 189904 (2012)], eprint 1012.5280.
  • He et al. (2012) Y. He, I. Vitev, and B.-W. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 713, 224 (2012), eprint 1105.2566.
  • Young et al. (2011) C. Young, B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024907 (2011), eprint 1103.5769.
  • Barata et al. (2023a) J. a. Barata, J. G. Milhano, and A. V. Sadofyev (2023a), eprint 2308.01294.
  • Adams et al. (2006) J. Adams et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 162301 (2006), eprint nucl-ex/0604018.
  • Casalderrey-Solana et al. (2011) J. Casalderrey-Solana, J. G. Milhano, and U. A. Wiedemann, J. Phys. G 38, 035006 (2011), eprint 1012.0745.
  • Aamodt et al. (2010) K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252301 (2010), eprint 1011.3916.
  • Aad et al. (2010) G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252303 (2010), eprint 1011.6182.
  • Sirunyan et al. (2019) A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 152001 (2019), eprint 1809.08602.
  • Baier et al. (1997a) R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B 484, 265 (1997a), eprint hep-ph/9608322.
  • Baier et al. (1997b) R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B 483, 291 (1997b), eprint hep-ph/9607355.
  • Baier et al. (1998) R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B 531, 403 (1998), eprint hep-ph/9804212.
  • Guo and Wang (2000) X.-f. Guo and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3591 (2000), eprint hep-ph/0005044.
  • Wang and Guo (2001) X.-N. Wang and X.-f. Guo, Nucl. Phys. A 696, 788 (2001), eprint hep-ph/0102230.
  • Casalderrey-Solana and Wang (2008) J. Casalderrey-Solana and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 77, 024902 (2008), eprint 0705.1352.
  • Majumder (2012) A. Majumder, Phys. Rev. D 85, 014023 (2012), eprint 0912.2987.
  • He et al. (2020) Y. He, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 122301 (2020), eprint 2001.08273.
  • Yang et al. (2021) Z. Yang, W. Chen, Y. He, W. Ke, L. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 082301 (2021), eprint 2101.05422.
  • Yang et al. (2023a) Z. Yang, Y. He, W. Chen, W.-Y. Ke, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 652 (2023a), eprint 2206.02393.
  • Li et al. (2011) H. Li, F. Liu, G.-l. Ma, X.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 012301 (2011), eprint 1006.2893.
  • He et al. (2015) Y. He, T. Luo, X.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. C 91, 054908 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 97, 019902 (2018)], eprint 1503.03313.
  • Cao et al. (2016) S. Cao, T. Luo, G.-Y. Qin, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 94, 014909 (2016), eprint 1605.06447.
  • Wang and Zhu (2013) X.-N. Wang and Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 062301 (2013), eprint 1302.5874.
  • Cao and Wang (2021) S. Cao and X.-N. Wang, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84, 024301 (2021), eprint 2002.04028.
  • Luo et al. (2023) T. Luo, Y. He, S. Cao, and X.-N. Wang (2023), eprint 2306.13742.
  • He et al. (2019) Y. He, S. Cao, W. Chen, T. Luo, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 99, 054911 (2019), eprint 1809.02525.
  • Chen et al. (2018) W. Chen, S. Cao, T. Luo, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 777, 86 (2018), eprint 1704.03648.
  • Luo et al. (2018) T. Luo, S. Cao, Y. He, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 782, 707 (2018), eprint 1803.06785.
  • Zhang et al. (2004) B.-W. Zhang, E. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 072301 (2004), eprint nucl-th/0309040.
  • Lin et al. (2005) Z.-W. Lin, C. M. Ko, B.-A. Li, B. Zhang, and S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064901 (2005), eprint nucl-th/0411110.
  • Pang et al. (2012) L. Pang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 86, 024911 (2012), eprint 1205.5019.
  • Pang et al. (2018) L.-G. Pang, H. Petersen, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 97, 064918 (2018), eprint 1802.04449.
  • Sjostrand et al. (2006) T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, JHEP 05, 026 (2006), eprint hep-ph/0603175.
  • Sjostrand et al. (2008) T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008), eprint 0710.3820.
  • Cacciari et al. (2012) M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012), eprint 1111.6097.
  • Cacciari and Salam (2006) M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam, Phys. Lett. B 641, 57 (2006), eprint hep-ph/0512210.
  • Yang et al. (2023b) Z. Yang, T. Luo, W. Chen, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 052301 (2023b), eprint 2203.03683.
  • Fu et al. (2023) Y. Fu, J. Casalderrey-Solana, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054038 (2023), eprint 2204.05323.
  • Barata et al. (2023b) J. a. Barata, A. V. Sadofyev, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 107, L051503 (2023b), eprint 2210.06519.
  • Barata et al. (2023c) J. a. Barata, X. Mayo López, A. V. Sadofyev, and C. A. Salgado, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034018 (2023c), eprint 2304.03712.
  • Luo et al. (2022) A. Luo, Y.-X. Mao, G.-Y. Qin, E.-K. Wang, and H.-Z. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 156 (2022), eprint 2107.11751.