FASHI: A search for extragalactic OH megamasers with FAST

Chuan-Peng Zhang National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei**g 100101, China Guizhou Radio Astronomical Observatory, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550000, China Cheng Cheng Chinese Academy of Sciences South America Center for Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, CAS, Bei**g 100101, China Ming Zhu **-Long Xu Peng Jiang National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei**g 100101, China Guizhou Radio Astronomical Observatory, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550000, China
Abstract

The FAST All Sky H I survey (FASHI) is broader in frequency band and sky volume, and deeper in detection sensitivity than the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA survey (ALFALFA). To efficiently expand the sample of OH megamasers (OHMs), whose strongest line has a rest frequency of 1667.35903 MHz, we directly matched the IRAS Point Source Catalog Redshift (PSCz) catalog with the corresponding FASHI data cube. From 145 PSCz sources already covered by FASHI, we obtained 27 OHMs with a detection rate of 18.6%, including 9 previously known and 18 new ones, within a redshift range of 0.14314zOH0.27656less-than-or-similar-to0.14314subscript𝑧OHless-than-or-similar-to0.276560.14314\lesssim z_{\rm OH}\lesssim 0.276560.14314 ≲ italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ 0.27656. We also measured the hyperfine ratio of nine OHMs between the 1667 and 1665 MHz lines. The ratio ranges from 1.32 to 15.22, with an average of R1667:1665=4.74subscript𝑅:166716654.74R_{1667:1665}=4.74italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.74. In a fit to the LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs. LFIRsubscript𝐿FIRL_{\rm FIR}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relation, we have logLOH=(1.57±0.10)logLFIR(15.80±1.19)logsubscript𝐿OHplus-or-minus1.570.10logsubscript𝐿FIRplus-or-minus15.801.19{\rm log}L_{\rm OH}=(1.57\pm 0.10){\rm log}L_{\rm FIR}-(15.80\pm 1.19)roman_log italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 1.57 ± 0.10 ) roman_log italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( 15.80 ± 1.19 ), which is almost the same as derived from previous observations. As expected, since the OHM sample was selected by cross-correlation with the IRAS-selected PSCz, our detected OHMs are [ultra]luminous infrared galaxies ([U]LIRGs). However, not all [U]LIRGs have detectable OH emission, suggesting that the OH emission may be triggered within a specific stage of the merger or can only be seen in specific orientations. In general, FAST, with its 19-beam array and UWB receiver, will be a powerful tool for observing more OHMs and unraveling their mystery in the future.

Radio telescopes (1360), Megamasers (1023), Hydroxyl masers (771), Redshift surveys (1378), Radio sources (1358)

1 Introduction

OH megamasers (OHMs) at rest frequencies of 1667 and 1665 MHz in extragalactic systems are valuable indicators of galaxy interactions. These megamasers are thought to originate from the starburst nuclei of merging gas-rich galaxy systems, based on both high-resolution interferometer observations (Lo, 2005) and statistical analysis of luminosity functions (Darling & Giovanelli, 2002, 2006; Giovanelli & Haynes, 2015). OHMs thus offer a distinctive approach to measuring the occurrence of gas-rich galaxy mergers at specific evolutionary stages (Lo, 2005). The masing emission or absorption lines are usually broad, with line widths up to 103kms1superscript103kmsuperscripts110^{3}\,{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and exhibit an implied isotropic luminosity in the range of 10104L10superscript104subscript𝐿direct-product10-10^{4}\,L_{\odot}10 - 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (Darling & Giovanelli, 2002). OHMs are connected to high-density molecular gas (n(H2)104cm3similar-to𝑛subscriptH2superscript104superscriptcm3n(\rm H_{2})\sim 10^{4}\,cm^{-3}italic_n ( roman_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∼ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_cm start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) and strong far-infrared radiation. They can offer potential insights into extreme star formation and galactic evolution, particularly high-redshift OHMs (Darling, 2007; Lockett & Elitzur, 2008; Roberts et al., 2021; Glowacki et al., 2022; Jarvis et al., 2023). Therefore, investigating OHMs is a meaningful pursuit.

As of now, approximately 136 OHMs have been discovered, for instance, in studies of Darling & Giovanelli (2002); Willett (2012); Haynes et al. (2018); Suess et al. (2016); Hess et al. (2021); Roberts et al. (2021); Glowacki et al. (2022); Jarvis et al. (2023). Searches with the Arecibo telescope represent the most successful tracking or single-point observation to date, detecting approximately 17% of OHMs (Darling & Giovanelli, 2000). All OHMs known to date are exclusively associated with [ultra]luminous infrared galaxies ([U]LIRGs), defined as having far-infrared luminosities 1011Lgreater-than-or-equivalent-toabsentsuperscript1011subscript𝐿direct-product\gtrsim 10^{11}L_{\odot}≳ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and LFIR1012Lgreater-than-or-equivalent-tosubscript𝐿FIRsuperscript1012subscript𝐿direct-productL_{\rm FIR}\gtrsim 10^{12}L_{\odot}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, respectively (Baan, 1991). However, only about 20% of [U]LIRGs are detected with OHM emission, as shown by studies conducted by Baan (1991); Baan et al. (1992); Darling & Giovanelli (2000, 2001, 2002). The production of OHMs may be a transient phenomenon in the evolution of a galaxy, from starburst nucleus to an AGN (Wiggins et al., 2016), or may be subject to beaming and orientation effects, as suggested in Darling (2007).

The Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST) All Sky H I survey (FASHI) aims to cover the entire sky visible to FAST, between declinations of 14superscript14-14^{\circ}- 14 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and +66superscript66+66^{\circ}+ 66 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, within a frequency range of 1.01.51.01.51.0-1.51.0 - 1.5 GHz (Nan et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2019, 2020). The survey currently has a typical map rms of similar-to\sim0.76 mJybeam1mJysuperscriptbeam1{\rm mJy~{}beam}^{-1}roman_mJy roman_beam start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and a spectral detection sensitivity of similar-to\sim1.50 mJy for a velocity resolution of 6.4 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT within a redshift range of 0.110.660.110.660.11-0.660.11 - 0.66 for OHMs (Zhang et al., 2024), while the Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA (ALFALFA) survey has a lower detection sensitivity of similar-to\sim1.86 mJybeam1mJysuperscriptbeam1{\rm mJy~{}beam}^{-1}roman_mJy roman_beam start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT after smoothing to a velocity resolution of 10 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (Haynes et al., 2018). This suggests that the FASHI could detect more OHMs than ALFALFA. Furthermore, the Ultra-Wide Bandwidth (UWB) receiver on FAST can simultaneously cover a frequency range of 500-3300 MHz (or z<2.33𝑧2.33z<2.33italic_z < 2.33), making FAST a powerful instrument for observing OHMs in extragalactic objects (Zhang et al., 2023).

In this paper, we report 18 new and 9 old OHMs detected by FAST. Section 2 shows the FAST observations and source identification. Section 3 presents the characterization of the detected OHMs and lists four OHM-related catalogs. Section 4 discusses the hyperfine ratio, host galaxy properties, LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and LFIRsubscript𝐿FIRL_{\rm FIR}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relationship, and FAST OHM detectability. Section 5 is a summary. Throughout this paper, we assume a ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM cosmology with H0subscript𝐻0H_{0}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 75 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Mpc-1, ΩM=0.3subscriptΩM0.3\Omega_{\rm M}=0.3roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3, and ΩΛ=0.7subscriptΩΛ0.7\Omega_{\rm\Lambda}=0.7roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.7.

2 Data and identification

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Locations for a total of 154 OHMs, including all previously known (Darling & Giovanelli, 2002, 2006; Willett, 2012; Suess et al., 2016; Hess et al., 2021; Glowacki et al., 2022; Jarvis et al., 2023) and 18 newly discovered OHMs in this work. The triangles with blue IRAS names are the 18 OHMs newly discovered by FAST, while the red ones are 9 known OHMs recovered by FAST. The black dots are OHMs previously discovered by others.

2.1 Observational data

Observations were obtained from the FASHI project (Zhang et al., 2024), which uses the FAST 19-beam receiver to efficiently cover the FAST sky. The aperture of FAST is 500 m and the effective aperture is about 300 m, resulting in a beam size of similar-to\sim2.9 at 1.4 GHz. The full bandwidth of 500 MHz in the spectral line backend has a frequency coverage of 1000 to 1500 MHz with a total of 64k channels. The corresponding frequency resolution is 7.63 kHz or 1.6 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at 1.4 GHz. The FASHI data are reduced using the FAST spectral data reduction pipeline HiFAST (**g et al., 2024). The HiFAST pipeline combines data reduction packages including antenna temperature correction, baseline correction, RFI mitigation (Zhang et al., 2022), standing wave correction, gridding, flux correction (Liu et al., 2024), and data cube generation. The data have been smoothed to 6.4 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT spectral resolution per channel and the data cubes are gridded to a pixel scale of 1′. A heliocentric Doppler correction was applied to the data. A detailed observational setup and data reduction procedure is presented in the FASHI paper by Zhang et al. (2024).

2.2 Source identification

Extragalactic H I and OHM lines have similar spectral profiles at different redshifts. Spectroscopic redshift information is needed to distinguish them (Hess et al., 2021). The IRAS Point Source Catalog Redshift (PSCz) survey consists of spectroscopic redshifts, infrared and optical photometry, and miscellaneous information for 18351 IRAS sources, mostly selected from the Point Source Catalog (Saunders et al., 2000). The survey covers almost all galaxies with flux brighter than 0.595 Jy at 60 microns, over 84% of the sky. It is well known that most previously known OHMs have associated IRAS sources (e.g., Darling & Giovanelli, 2000, 2001, 2002). To efficiently expand the OHM sample, we directly cross-checked the PSCz catalog (Saunders et al., 2000) with the corresponding FASHI data cube to see if there are any emission lines within a beam size of 2.9 and a velocity range of similar-to\sim600 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The FASHI data covers around 10000 deg2 within 0hRA17hless-than-or-similar-tosuperscript0RAless-than-or-similar-tosuperscript170^{h}\lesssim{\rm RA}\lesssim 17^{h}0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≲ roman_RA ≲ 17 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, 22hRA24hless-than-or-similar-tosuperscript22RAless-than-or-similar-tosuperscript2422^{h}\lesssim{\rm RA}\lesssim 24^{h}22 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≲ roman_RA ≲ 24 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, 6Dec0less-than-or-similar-tosuperscript6Decless-than-or-similar-tosuperscript06^{\circ}\lesssim{\rm Dec}\lesssim 0^{\circ}6 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≲ roman_Dec ≲ 0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and 18Dec64less-than-or-similar-tosuperscript18Decless-than-or-similar-tosuperscript6418^{\circ}\lesssim{\rm Dec}\lesssim 64^{\circ}18 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≲ roman_Dec ≲ 64 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with a typical spectral detection sensitivity of similar-to\sim1.50 mJy for a velocity resolution of similar-to\sim6.4 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at 1.4 GHz. Because the FASHI project can only operate in schedule-filler mode, parts of the above region are not fully covered. Within the region we found that there are a total of 145 PSCz sources covered by the current FASHI data with spectroscopic redshifts in the frequency range from 1304 to 1461 MHz. Using the FAST spectral data and the moment 0, 1, 2 images, we check the 145 sources one by one, including the redshift, coordinate, flux density, and the g𝑔gitalic_g, r𝑟ritalic_r, and z𝑧zitalic_z bands of the SDSS data, and then discard the probable H I sources as judged by the spectroscopic redshift information. In the end, we discovered and conformed 27 OHMs, 18 of which were first found by FAST. Detailed information on these sources is presented in the following sections.

3 Detection Results and Analysis

3.1 OHM locations

In Figure 1 we show all the OHM locations, including 18 new OHMs found by FAST and 136 known ones found by others. From Figure 1 we can see that the previously known OHMs are mostly located at 0Dec30less-than-or-similar-tosuperscript0Decless-than-or-similar-tosuperscript300^{\circ}\lesssim{\rm Dec}\lesssim 30^{\circ}0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≲ roman_Dec ≲ 30 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, covered by the Arecibo observations. It is expected that the FAST observation will be able to fill the gap of Dec30greater-than-or-equivalent-toDecsuperscript30{\rm Dec}\gtrsim 30^{\circ}roman_Dec ≳ 30 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and Dec0less-than-or-similar-toDecsuperscript0{\rm Dec}\lesssim 0^{\circ}roman_Dec ≲ 0 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Currently, the area covered by FAST has reached similar-to\sim10000 deg2. We have discovered and identified 27 OHMs, which is 20% of all known OHMs, and including 18 newly found OHMs, which is 12.4% of all known OHMs. The 27 OHMs are selected and identified from the 145 PSCz sources, already covered by the current FAST observation. This means that the FAST OHM detection rate is 18.6%, which is close to the 17% detection rate of the Arecibo OHM survey (Darling & Giovanelli, 2000). However, about 20 previously known OHMs with PSCz counterparts are not detected by FAST, although they lie within the volume surveyed by FASHI. The main reason for this is the currently limited detection sensitivity. Furthermore, it also means that about 47 (27+20) OHMs have been successfully detected in the 145 PSCz sources, resulting in a detection rate of 32.4% for this PSCz sample.

3.2 Individual sources

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: OHM IRAS 00256-0208. Left: FAST OH emission spectrum. The 1667 MHz OH redshift measured by FAST (in black) and an optical spectroscopic redshift (in red) are presented above and below the spectrum with text and corresponding colored arrows, respectively. The expected location of 1665 MHz OH line is indicated by a shorter arrow. Middle: Gray contours indicate the OH integrated intensity distribution seen by FAST with a beam size of similar-to\sim2.9. The contour levels are shown in the image. The background shows an RGB image of the g𝑔gitalic_g, r𝑟ritalic_r, and z𝑧zitalic_z bands of the SDSS data. The white square indicates the OC of the OHM. Right: The zoomed-in RGB image of the OC within the white square in the middle panel. The other 26 OHMs are shown in Figure 6.

In Tables 1, 2, and 3 we list the parameters of 27 OHMs measured by FAST, including 18 newly discovered and 9 previously known sources. Of the latter, eight previously known sources were observed by the Arecibo OHM survey (Darling & Giovanelli, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2006), and IRAS 10597+5926 was first found by Willett (2012). For all nine previously known OHMs, the positions and redshifts of the optical counterparts (OCs) are in good agreement with those of the FAST OH observations. For all 27 OHMs, the OH spectra, integrated intensity distributions, and RGB images are shown in Figures 2 and 6, where both the radio and optical redshifts are given in the spectral panels, and the position of each OC is given in the OH integrated intensity map. In nearly all 27 OHMs, optical RGB images show typical merging systems with elongated tidal tails surrounding the nucleus. For IRAS 00256-0208, 10558+3845, 12018+1941, 12447+3721, 14170+4545, 14202+2615, 15043+5754, and 15160+5307, the detection sensitivities are low and they require more observation time for further confirmation. IRAS 08328+5148 is one of four OHMs for which the centroid of the FAST detection is relatively far away on the sky from the position of the putative optical counterpart. (The others, to differing degrees, are IRAS 03111-0244, IRAS 12447+3721, and IRAS 14202+2615.) These OHMs could be similar to IRAS 08328+5148, in that the true counterpart for the OHM might be a galaxy that is associated with, but not identical to, the “optical counterpart” with the matching spectroscopic redshift. Other notes for some of the OHMs are as follows:

IRAS 00256-0208 This OHM has the third highest redshift among all known OHMs in the main 1667 MHz OH emission lines, the highest being J095903.22+025356.1 with a redshift of zOH0.7092similar-tosubscript𝑧OH0.7092z_{\rm OH}\sim 0.7092italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 0.7092, recently discovered by Jarvis et al. (2023).

IRAS 01562+2527111Listed as IRAS 01562+2528 by Darling & Giovanelli (2002) This has been confirmed as an OHM by the Arecibo OHM survey (Darling & Giovanelli, 2002). This survey has a consistent detection result with FAST.

IRAS 02524+2046 This OHM was first confirmed by the Arecibo OHM survey (Darling & Giovanelli, 2002), which detected an extremely strong peak reaching 40 mJy. However, the peak detected by FAST is 21.78±1.83plus-or-minus21.781.8321.78\pm 1.8321.78 ± 1.83 mJy. This is probably because the OH flux density is time variable. The emission lines are strong and narrow and show an extremely good correspondence between the 1667 and 1665 MHz lines. This allows us to measure the hyperfine line ratio (see Table 2).

IRAS 06487+2208 This OHM was first found and reported by the Arecibo OHM survey (Darling & Giovanelli, 2000). The optical spectrum of this source has been described as a composite of H II and LINER features based on the Osterbrock spectral line ratio classification method (Osterbrock, 1989; Veilleux et al., 1995). The optical RGB image is unresolved, but there may be another nucleus or tidal tail to the north of the main nucleus.

IRAS 08201+2801 This has been confirmed as an OHM by the Arecibo OHM survey (Darling & Giovanelli, 2001). Kim et al. (1998) classified the nucleus of this OHM as a starburst. The OH spectrum of this source shows multiple velocity components. In Figure 6, the optical RGB image shows an obvious interaction morphology with two nuclei connected by arcs and a single kinked tidal tail, clearly indicating an advanced merger (see also Darling & Giovanelli, 2001).

IRAS 08328+5148 This is a newly discovered OHM (see Figure 6). To the east (OC-1 with RA, Dec = 129.1717, 51.6246) of the OC listed in Table 3, there is an optical spectroscopic object with a redshift of 0.237 from the SDSS catalog. However, the OC coordinates are 48′′ away from the OH emission center measured by FASHI. Fortunately, we find another optical object (named OC-2 with RA, Dec = 129.1505, 51.6267) at the center of the OH emission distribution. Although this object has no spectroscopic redshift, its SDSS photometric redshift is 0.234±0.070plus-or-minus0.2340.0700.234\pm 0.0700.234 ± 0.070, which agrees well with the OH redshift of 0.23749. In addition, OC-1 and OC-2 have similar optical colors. Furthermore, the coordinates of IRAS 08328+5148 are in good agreement with the observed OH line coordinates. Therefore, it is likely that OC-2 is the optical counterpart of this OHM, but its spectroscopic redshift is needed for further confirmation.

IRAS 10106+4708 The source is bright in all four WISE bands, and the optical data display an evident tidal tail (see Figure 6). Despite that, the optical extinction is significant, leading to the absence of the Hβ𝛽\betaitalic_β and [OIII] lines. WISE colors are estimated to be [4.6]-[12] = 4.18 and [3.4]-[4.6] = 0.86, leading this object to be described as a dusty quasar (Nikutta et al., 2014).

IRAS 10597+5926 This OHM was first found and reported by Willett (2012), where the detected peak flux density is 17.56 mJy, while it is 32.27±2.23plus-or-minus32.272.2332.27\pm 2.2332.27 ± 2.23 mJy measured by FAST. The flux densities are very different, but the line profiles are consistent between the two.

IRAS 11029+3130222listed as IRAS 11028+3130 by Darling & Giovanelli (2001) This was first found and reported by the Arecibo OHM surveys (Darling & Giovanelli, 2001). The central core is a LINER-type active galaxy nucleus (Alatalo et al., 2016).

IRAS 11087+5351 The 1665 MHz emission line is clearly visible. The measured line ratio is R1667:1665=1.32±0.21subscript𝑅:16671665plus-or-minus1.320.21R_{1667:1665}=1.32\pm 0.21italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.32 ± 0.21, which is the lowest measured ratio among all sources in this work. In Figure 6, the optical RGB image shows an extended morphology with a bright nucleus in the center. The central nucleus is optically identified as a LINER-type active galaxy nucleus by Toba et al. (2014).

IRAS 11161+6020 Toba et al. (2014) classified this object spectroscopically as a Seyfert 2 galaxy.

IRAS 11301-0523 In Figure 6 the optical RGB image shows an arc-like structure with several close and connected nuclei. The OH spectrum has multiple velocity components, and the 1665 MHz line is not visible.

IRAS 12447+3721 Duarte Puertas et al. (2017) classified it as a H II galaxy with a high star formation rate.

IRAS 13469+5833 The optical RGB image shows a possible merging system with several tidal tails surrounding the nuclei (see also the HST F814W-band images in Murata et al., 2017). The OH spectrum has double velocity components. The IRAS 13469+5833 is identified as an H II galaxy (Lin et al., 2018).

IRAS 14202+2615 This source has been observed by the Arecibo OHM surveys (Darling & Giovanelli, 2000, 2006), but without sufficient sensitivity to see the OH emission line. In the FASHI survey we detected the OHM emission line with a peak flux density of 4.38±1.15plus-or-minus4.381.154.38\pm 1.154.38 ± 1.15 mJy, at a SNR of only about 3 (see Figure 6). The optical redshift from Saunders et al. (2000) is in good agreement with the OH line measured by FAST, while the spatially projected coordinate offset is similar-to\sim2.0. The optical RGB image shows two close nuclei, one of which has a visible tidal tail. This morphology probably indicates a merging system.

IRAS 15160+5307 The OH spectrum has a weak peak of similar-to\sim2.5 mJy, but the blue wing is broad and the red wing has an absorption feature.

IRAS 15261+5502 Hou et al. (2009) classified it as a starburst galaxy.

IRAS 16468+5200 Weedman & Houck (2008) classified it as a LINER-type active galaxy nucleus. In Figure 6 the optical RGB image shows a typical merging system with two interacting nuclei, one of which has an elongated tidal tail.

IRAS 23129+2548 This source has been confirmed as an OHM by the Arecibo OHM surveys (Darling & Giovanelli, 2001). The nucleus of this OHM host is classified as a LINER by Veilleux et al. (1999).

3.3 OHM catalog

Table 1: FASHI detected OHMs including coordinates, redshift, line width, peak flux.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
FASHI ID FASHI name IRAS name RAoh Decoh zsubscript𝑧direct-productz_{\odot}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Vhelisubscript𝑉heliV_{\rm heli}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_heli end_POSTSUBSCRIPT W50subscript𝑊50W_{50}italic_W start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 50 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Fpeaksubscript𝐹peakF_{\rm peak}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_peak end_POSTSUBSCRIPT rms
J2000 B1950 deg deg kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mJy mJy
20240066172 J002814.52-015310.0 00256-0208 7.061 -1.886 0.27656 82912.1 279.6 3.05 0.88
20240066090 J015902.56+254224.7 01562+2527 29.761 25.707 0.16600 49766.2 272.8 6.72 1.43
20240066093 J025515.32+205835.5 02524+2046 43.814 20.977 0.18067 54164.0 86.4 21.78 1.83
20240066181 J031336.48-023255.8 03111-0244 48.402 -2.549 0.18956 56827.9 77.1 15.27 1.67
20240066097 J065143.27+220518.1 06487+2208 102.930 22.088 0.14347 43012.5 130.4 5.82 1.37
20240066055 J082310.95+275137.6 08201+2801 125.796 27.860 0.16793 50343.5 242.3 11.45 1.50
20240099047 J083634.98+513745.8 08328+5148 129.146 51.629 0.23749 71196.3 105.9 10.63 1.10
20240066185 J085909.64-030430.6 08566-0252 134.790 -3.075 0.20262 60743.1 190.2 7.73 1.27
20240066025 J101347.44+465356.6 10106+4708 153.448 46.899 0.20529 61543.0 159.4 24.73 1.32
20240066062 J105837.38+382836.6 10558+3845 164.656 38.477 0.20788 62319.4 26.3 4.35 1.04
20240066027 J110245.08+591005.0 10597+5926 165.688 59.168 0.19607 58780.0 236.2 32.27 2.23
20240066060 J110537.56+311427.4 11029+3130 166.407 31.241 0.19885 59613.8 130.2 3.36 0.97
20240066028 J111136.57+533514.0 11087+5351 167.902 53.587 0.14314 42913.0 101.9 3.65 0.87
20240129741 J111908.12+600432.5 11161+6020 169.784 60.076 0.26434 79246.5 288.2 9.07 2.05
20240066187 J113239.21-053833.9 11301-0523 173.163 -5.643 0.22984 68903.1 168.0 6.98 1.46
20240066105 J120420.53+192456.7 12018+1941 181.086 19.416 0.16783 50315.5 254.6 1.90 0.83
20240066030 J122539.49+551528.9 12232+5532 186.415 55.258 0.23250 69702.5 166.1 2.40 0.66
20240066069 J124709.66+370508.6 12447+3721 191.790 37.086 0.15847 47506.6 198.0 1.40 0.68
20240066013 J130854.87+635636.6 13070+6412 197.229 63.944 0.20523 61525.8 154.6 12.48 1.97
20240066035 J134841.23+581817.8 13469+5833 207.172 58.305 0.15716 47114.4 20.6 9.43 1.26
20240066034 J141859.45+453206.3 14170+4545 214.748 45.535 0.15009 44997.1 68.7 2.43 0.85
20240066110 J142227.98+260225.7 14202+2615 215.617 26.040 0.15925 47740.6 16.0 4.38 1.15
20240066037 J150535.42+574248.3 15043+5754 226.398 57.713 0.15029 45054.5 115.9 2.17 1.16
20240066039 J151732.61+525616.8 15160+5307 229.386 52.938 0.15227 45648.2 195.3 1.34 0.51
20240102609 J152725.70+545139.2 15261+5502 231.857 54.861 0.22902 68657.8 218.0 8.42 1.04
20240066042 J164800.26+515535.2 16468+5200 252.001 51.926 0.15032 45065.1 151.3 3.98 1.28
20240066122 J231519.36+260419.1 23129+2548 348.831 26.072 0.17881 53605.7 278.4 3.42 0.96

Notes. The IRAS names in bold are previously known OHMs, while the others are newly discovered by FAST.

Table 1 presents the main properties of 27 OHMs detected by FASHI, including coordinates, redshift, line width, and flux. Each column in Table 1 is introduced as follows:

  • Column 1: Index number for each FASHI extragalactic source. This index number is unique to each FASHI source.

  • Column 2: Centroid coordinate (J2000) for the OH source in the format of Jhhmmss.ss±plus-or-minus\pm±ddmmss.s.

  • Column 3: IRAS source name (Helou & Walker, 1988).

  • Column 4-5: Right ascension (RA) and declination (Dec) in units of deg for the FASHI source centroid (J2000).

  • Column 6: Redshift, zsubscript𝑧direct-productz_{\odot}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of the 1667 MHz OH line, corresponding to the heliocentric velocity in Column 7.

  • Column 7: Heliocentric velocity of the OH source, czsubscript𝑧direct-productz_{\odot}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in units of kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. All results are presented in this work using the optical helio-centric definition of velocity.

  • Column 8: Velocity width of the OH line profile, W50subscript𝑊50W_{50}italic_W start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 50 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, measured at the level of 50% of the peak.

  • Column 9: OH line peak intensity, Fpeaksubscript𝐹peakF_{\rm peak}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_peak end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in mJy.

  • Column 10: OH line noise level for the spatially integrated spectral profile, σrmssubscript𝜎rms\sigma_{\rm{rms}}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rms end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in mJy. It was obtained by measuring over the signal and RFI free portions of the integrated H I spectrum at a spectral resolution of 6.4 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

3.4 Hyperfine ratio catalog

Table 2: Hyperfine ratio between the 1667 and 1665 MHz lines.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
FASHI ID IRAS name Sint1667superscriptsubscript𝑆int1667S_{\rm int}^{1667}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1667 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Vmin1667superscriptsubscript𝑉min1667V_{\rm min}^{1667}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1667 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Vmax1667superscriptsubscript𝑉max1667V_{\rm max}^{1667}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1667 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Sint1665superscriptsubscript𝑆int1665S_{\rm int}^{1665}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1665 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Vmin1665superscriptsubscript𝑉min1665V_{\rm min}^{1665}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1665 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Vmax1665superscriptsubscript𝑉max1665V_{\rm max}^{1665}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1665 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT R1667:1665subscript𝑅:16671665R_{1667:1665}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
mJy\cdotkms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mJy\cdotkms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ratio
20240066172 00256-0208 1089.2 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 65.1 82246.2 83457.0
20240066090 01562+2527 2026.8 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 93.5 49363.3 50148.7
20240066093 02524+2046 1781.4 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 59.1 54028.3 54243.2 607.3 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 42.6 54065.6 54396.2 2.93 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.23
20240066181 03111-0244 1167.6 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 54.0 56703.8 56921.8 424.2 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 57.8 56728.9 57181.4 2.75 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.40
20240066097 06487+2208 848.0 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 58.9 42839.9 43178.3 259.7 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 46.8 42869.3 43121.6 3.27 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.63
20240066055 08201+2801 2110.0 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 77.8 50065.3 50568.3
20240099047 08328+5148 1325.4 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 50.6 70921.6 71376.2 140.4 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 27.1 71142.6 71319.7 9.44 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 1.85
20240066185 08566-0252 1427.1 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 51.1 60584.7 60919.2
20240066025 10106+4708 4011.7 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 68.5 61332.6 61876.2
20240066062 10558+3845 212.3 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 46.7 62083.1 62492.4 130.7 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 30.6 62179.0 62420.2 1.62 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.52
20240066027 10597+5926 7259.4 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 112.5 58535.6 59039.4 477.0 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 45.2 58688.7 59067.3 15.22 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 1.46
20240066060 11029+3130 424.8 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 40.6 59463.6 59819.7
20240066028 11087+5351 289.4 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 27.2 42818.6 43005.8 219.1 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 28.2 42797.8 43035.7 1.32 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.21
20240129741 11161+6020 2468.3 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 114.1 78901.6 79578.7
20240066187 11301-0523 1014.8 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 66.7 68669.5 69110.5
20240066105 12018+1941 370.6 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 37.4 50139.7 50530.3 80.8 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 20.5 50276.9 50412.2 4.59 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 1.25
20240066030 12232+5532 399.8 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 26.0 69534.9 69869.2 259.2 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 25.2 69535.6 69853.5 1.54 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.18
20240066069 12447+3721 287.8 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 33.0 47306.6 47749.7
20240066013 13070+6412 2016.0 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 91.6 61324.5 61764.1
20240066035 13469+5833 556.0 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 51.5 46975.8 47292.6
20240066034 14170+4545 197.8 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 36.1 44860.1 45194.9
20240066110 14202+2615 319.4 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 49.4 47601.5 47949.1
20240066037 15043+5754 211.0 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 44.5 44925.3 45202.0
20240066039 15160+5307 305.5 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 28.4 45368.5 45923.7
20240102609 15261+5502 1857.3 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 57.5 68312.8 68944.2
20240066042 16468+5200 640.3 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 57.8 44889.0 45267.6
20240066122 23129+2548 845.4 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 57.8 53272.0 53960.7

Notes. The IRAS names in bold are previously known OHMs, while the others are newly discovered by FAST.

Table 2 presents the integrated flux and the hyperfine ratio between the 1667 and 1665 MHz lines. Each column in Table 2 is introduced as follows:

  • Column 1: Index number for each FASHI extragalactic source. This index number is unique to each FASHI source.

  • Column 2: IRAS source name.

  • Column 3: Integrated flux of the 1667 MHz line, Sintsubscript𝑆intS_{\rm int}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in mJybeam1kms1mJysuperscriptbeam1kmsuperscripts1{\rm mJy~{}beam}^{-1}{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_mJy roman_beam start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, summing all velocity channels containing signal within an appropriate velocity range from each integrated spectrum. The velocity range is listed in Columns 4 and 5.

  • Columns 4-5: The minimum (Vmin1667superscriptsubscript𝑉min1667V_{\rm min}^{1667}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1667 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) and maximum (Vmax1667superscriptsubscript𝑉max1667V_{\rm max}^{1667}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1667 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) velocities of the integrated flux range for the 1667 MHz line.

  • Column 6: Integrated flux of the 1665 MHz line, Sintsubscript𝑆intS_{\rm int}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in mJybeam1kms1mJysuperscriptbeam1kmsuperscripts1{\rm mJy~{}beam}^{-1}{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_mJy roman_beam start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, summing all velocity channels containing signal within an appropriate velocity range from each integrated spectrum. The velocity range is listed in Columns 7 and 8.

  • Columns 7-8: The minimum (Vmin1665superscriptsubscript𝑉min1665V_{\rm min}^{1665}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_min end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1665 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) and maximum (Vmax1665superscriptsubscript𝑉max1665V_{\rm max}^{1665}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_max end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1665 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) velocities of the integrated flux range for the 1665 MHz line.

  • Column 9: Hyperfine line ratio between the 1667 and 1665 MHz lines.

3.5 OHM optical counterpart catalog

Table 3: OHM optical counterparts including IRAS flux and FIR properties.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
FASHI ID IRAS name RAoc Decoc zsubscript𝑧direct-productz_{\odot}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT f60subscript𝑓60f_{60}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 60 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT f100subscript𝑓100f_{100}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 100 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT DLsubscript𝐷LD_{\rm L}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT logLFIRsubscript𝐿FIRL_{\rm FIR}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT logLOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
B1950 deg deg PSCz Jy Jy h751superscriptsubscript751h_{75}^{-1}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 75 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTGpc h752Lsuperscriptsubscript752subscript𝐿direct-producth_{75}^{-2}L_{\odot}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 75 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT h752Lsuperscriptsubscript752subscript𝐿direct-producth_{75}^{-2}L_{\odot}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 75 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
20240066172 00256-0208 7.059 -1.863 0.27630 0.65 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.07 1.00 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 1.320 12.27 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 3.40 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03
20240066090 01562+2527 29.761 25.710 0.16580 0.80 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06 1.85 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.15 0.744 11.93 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02 3.22 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02
20240066093 02524+2046 43.821 20.983 0.18153 0.94 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.08 8.48 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 0.817 12.46 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.01 3.24 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.01
20240066181 03111-0244 48.422 -2.560 0.18833 0.69 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06 1.03 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 0.862 11.92 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02 3.09 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02
20240066097 06487+2208 102.941 22.074 0.14370 2.07 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.17 2.36 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.26 0.634 12.09 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 2.71 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03
20240066055 08201+2801 125.803 27.861 0.16750 1.13 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09 1.60 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.18 0.753 12.01 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 3.24 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02
20240099047 08328+5148 129.150 51.627 0.23700 0.37 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.11 1.58 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 1.110 12.09 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05 3.35 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02
20240066185 08566-0252 134.789 -3.070 0.20201 0.79 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.07 1.10 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 0.928 12.03 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 3.24 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02
20240066025 10106+4708 153.450 46.900 0.20481 0.77 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.08 1.37 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.30 0.942 12.07 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05 3.70 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.01
20240066062 10558+3845 164.664 38.485 0.20660 0.70 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06 1.00 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 0.955 12.01 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02 2.44 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.10
20240066027 10597+5926 165.696 59.177 0.19583 1.02 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.08 1.33 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.17 0.895 12.10 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 3.92 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.01
20240066060 11029+3130 166.406 31.242 0.19890 1.04 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09 1.38 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.11 0.909 12.12 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 2.70 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04
20240066028 11087+5351 167.902 53.583 0.14270 1.00 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.11 1.00 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.13 0.632 11.75 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 2.24 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04
20240129741 11161+6020 169.779 60.075 0.26428 0.61 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05 1.28 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.19 1.253 12.25 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 3.72 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02
20240066187 11301-0523 173.175 -5.663 0.23019 0.70 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.07 1.42 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.16 1.069 12.16 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 3.21 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03
20240066105 12018+1941 181.102 19.419 0.16865 1.64 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.18 1.86 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.22 0.753 12.14 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 2.49 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04
20240066030 12232+5532 186.410 55.264 0.23143 0.62 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06 1.63 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 1.083 12.18 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02 2.81 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03
20240066069 12447+3721 191.782 37.094 0.15870 1.11 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.12 1.00 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 0.707 11.88 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 2.33 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05
20240066013 13070+6412 197.231 63.941 0.20492 0.74 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05 0.71 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.11 0.941 11.96 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 3.40 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02
20240066035 13469+5833 207.167 58.315 0.15778 1.34 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.11 1.99 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.14 0.700 12.02 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02 2.60 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04
20240066034 14170+4545 214.745 45.537 0.15026 0.73 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06 1.19 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.12 0.666 11.73 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 2.11 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.08
20240066110 14202+2615 215.631 26.035 0.15915 1.45 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.16 1.95 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.23 0.711 12.06 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 2.38 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.07
20240066037 15043+5754 226.415 57.719 0.15059 0.99 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.07 1.42 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.10 0.667 11.85 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02 2.14 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09
20240066039 15160+5307 229.374 52.947 0.15199 0.64 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 1.38 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.08 0.677 11.74 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02 2.32 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04
20240102609 15261+5502 231.861 54.864 0.22921 0.53 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05 1.00 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 1.065 12.03 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 3.47 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.01
20240066042 16468+5200 252.006 51.929 0.15054 1.01 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.07 1.61 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00 0.667 11.87 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02 2.63 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04
20240066122 23129+2548 348.839 26.076 0.17810 1.80 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.20 1.70 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.17 0.808 12.21 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 2.90 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03

Notes. The IRAS names in bold are previously known OHMs, while the others are first discovered by FAST.

Table 3 presents the main properties of the OCs corresponding to the OHMs, including IRAS flux densities, and FIR properties. Each column in Table 3 is introduced as follows:

  • Column 1: Index number for each FASHI extragalactic source. This index number is unique to each FASHI source.

  • Column 2: IRAS source catalog name.

  • Column 3-4: RA and Dec with centroid coordinate (J2000) in units of deg for OHM OCs extracted from the SDSS catalog.

  • Column 5: Heliocentric optical redshift, zsubscript𝑧direct-productz_{\odot}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, extracted from the SDSS catalog.

  • Column 6-7: IRAS 60 and 100 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm flux densities f60subscript𝑓60f_{60}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 60 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and f100subscript𝑓100f_{100}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 100 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in units of Jy (Helou & Walker, 1988).

  • Column 8: Luminosity distance DLsubscript𝐷LD_{\rm L}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in h751Gpcsuperscriptsubscript751Gpch_{75}^{-1}{\rm Gpc}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 75 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Gpc, estimated with the cosmology calculator333https://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html (Wright, 2006).

  • Column 9: Logarithm of the FIR luminosity LFIRsubscript𝐿FIRL_{\rm FIR}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in units of h752Lsuperscriptsubscript752subscript𝐿h_{75}^{-2}L_{\sun}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 75 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ☉ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, estimated using the following equation from Sanders & Mirabel (1996) with

    LFIR=3.96×1011DL2(2.58f60+f100),subscript𝐿FIR3.96superscript1011superscriptsubscript𝐷L22.58subscript𝑓60subscript𝑓100L_{\rm FIR}=3.96\times 10^{11}D_{\rm L}^{2}(2.58f_{60}+f_{100}),italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 3.96 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2.58 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 60 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 100 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , (1)

    where f60subscript𝑓60f_{60}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 60 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and f100subscript𝑓100f_{100}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 100 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are listed in Columns 6 and 7, and DLsubscript𝐷LD_{\rm L}italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in units of h751Gpcsuperscriptsubscript751Gpch_{75}^{-1}{\rm Gpc}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 75 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Gpc listed in Column 8.

  • Column 10: OH line luminosity LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in units of h752Lsuperscriptsubscript752subscript𝐿h_{75}^{-2}L_{\sun}italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 75 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ☉ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. From the integrated line flux Sintsubscript𝑆intS_{\rm int}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT we use the general relation for the spectral line luminosity (e.g., Briggs, 1998) with

    LOHL=(1.70641+zOH)(SintmJykms1)(DLGpc)2,subscript𝐿OHsubscript𝐿direct-product1.70641subscript𝑧OHsubscript𝑆intmJykmsuperscripts1superscriptsubscript𝐷𝐿Gpc2{\frac{L_{\rm OH}}{L_{\odot}}}=\Big{(}{\frac{1.7064}{1+z_{\rm OH}}}\Big{)}\,% \Big{(}{\frac{S_{\rm int}}{\rm mJy\,km\,s^{-1}}}\Big{)}\,\Big{(}{\frac{D_{L}}{% \rm Gpc}}\Big{)}^{2},divide start_ARG italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = ( divide start_ARG 1.7064 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ( divide start_ARG italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_int end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_mJy roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) ( divide start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG roman_Gpc end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (2)

    where we take the stronger of the two main OH lines with a rest frequency of 1667.35903 MHz to define zOHsubscript𝑧OHz_{\rm OH}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

3.6 OHM catalog cross-matching with GSWLC

Table 4: Cross-matched sources between all the known 154 OHMs and GSWLC.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
IRAS name OBJID RA Dec zsubscript𝑧direct-productz_{\odot}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT log(M)M_{\star})italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋆ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) log(SFRSED)\rm SFR_{SED})roman_SFR start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_SED end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) AVsubscript𝐴VA_{\rm V}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT
B1950 deg deg MsubscriptMdirect-product\rm M_{\odot}roman_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Myr1subscriptMdirect-productsuperscriptyr1\rm M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}roman_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_yr start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mag
07556+2859 1237657629506142647 119.727 28.886 0.1262 10.70 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 -0.54 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.71 0.24 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.10
08122+0505 1237660668730408974 123.723 4.937 0.1033 11.04 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 0.57 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.24 0.43 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.16
08449+2332 1237664834854518934 131.959 23.353 0.1517 10.71 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06 1.47 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.05 0.47 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06
09039+0503 1237658423543595297 136.642 4.858 0.1250 10.81 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 1.56 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.06 0.86 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06
09116+0334 1237654605316358298 138.574 3.365 0.1460 10.91 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 0.43 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.16 0.23 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.10
09320+6134 1237651272966275163 143.965 61.353 0.0394 11.25 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 1.16 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.01 0.75 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.00
09531+1430 1237671261205495893 148.958 14.269 0.2152 11.34 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 1.00 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.18 0.62 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.12
09540+3521 1237664669506863314 149.246 35.119 0.1006 10.72 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 0.36 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.23 0.59 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.11
10378+1108 1237661949170155593 160.122 10.888 0.1363 11.03 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03 1.57 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.02 0.82 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03
10558+3845 1237664668975562850 164.664 38.485 0.2081 11.01 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09 1.56 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.14 0.69 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.14
11011+4107 1237662194520293391 165.976 40.850 0.0348 9.97 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.14 0.58 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.18 0.49 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.11
11087+5351 1237657590319022140 167.902 53.583 0.1429 10.91 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.07 1.44 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.20 0.73 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.18
11257+5850 1237655107301277787 172.140 58.563 0.0105 10.40 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 0.85 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.08 0.86 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09
12018+1941 1237667914881892435 181.102 19.419 0.1679 10.89 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09 1.44 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.12 0.60 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.15
12447+3721 1237664672714653739 191.782 37.094 0.1582 10.39 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09 0.96 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.18 0.24 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.15
13254+4754 1237661149769760972 201.900 47.647 0.0607 9.77 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.07 0.33 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.08 0.17 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.08
13428+5608 1237661387602853939 206.176 55.887 0.0373 10.77 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05 0.35 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.33 0.39 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.14
13469+5833 1237659326015537309 207.167 58.314 0.1575 11.00 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05 0.90 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.14 0.40 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.14
14202+2615 1237665441523957822 215.631 26.035 0.1587 11.05 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05 1.38 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.02 0.20 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02
14312+2825 1237665351854784676 218.365 28.200 0.1748 11.30 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09 1.59 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.05 0.73 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.08
14488+3521 1237662305655717891 222.726 35.144 0.2057 11.41 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 2.23 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.02 0.73 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.01
15043+5754 1237671769072206053 226.415 57.719 0.1506 10.67 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06 1.29 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.10 0.44 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.14
15160+5307 1237655463779631232 229.374 52.946 0.1522 11.21 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06 1.47 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.08 0.37 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.11
15224+1033 1237662636908478686 231.213 10.380 0.1346 10.78 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.05 1.13 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.05 0.34 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.03
15250+3608 1237662335714852881 231.748 35.977 0.0552 10.63 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 0.97 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.06 0.38 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.06
15327+2340 1237665537075511390 233.738 23.504 0.0184 10.87 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.02 0.37 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.08 0.69 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.07
16145+4231 1237665356696846411 244.050 42.400 0.0232 9.76 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.04 -0.33 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.10 0.19 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09
16300+1558 1237665536008520057 248.089 15.863 0.2418 11.20 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.09 1.71 ±plus-or-minus\pm±0.13 0.49 ±plus-or-minus\pm± 0.15

Notes. The listed Columns [2]-[8] in this catalog are extracted from GSWLC (Salim et al., 2016).

Table 4 shows the 28 sources recovered when all known 154 OHMs are cross-matched with the GALEX-SDSS-WISE Legacy Catalog (GSWLC) catalog (Salim et al., 2016) under the condition δRA3subscript𝛿RAsuperscript3\rm\delta_{RA}\leq 3^{\prime}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_RA end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 3 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, δDec3subscript𝛿Decsuperscript3\rm\delta_{Dec}\leq 3^{\prime}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Dec end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 3 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and δHIvelocity300kms1subscript𝛿HIvelocity300kmsuperscripts1\rm\delta_{HI\,velocity}\leq 300\,{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_HI roman_velocity end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≤ 300 roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Nine of these 28 OHMs are detected are detected by FAST. Each column in Table 3 is introduced as follows:

  • Column 1: IRAS source catalog name.

  • Column 2: OBJID, SDSS photometric identification number, from GSWLC.

  • Column 3-4: RA and Dec with centroid coordinate (J2000) in units deg, from GSWLC.

  • Column 5: Redshift, zsubscript𝑧direct-productz_{\odot}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, from GSWLC.

  • Column 6: Stellar mass, log(M)M_{\star})italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋆ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) with its error, from GSWLC.

  • Column 7: UV/optical (SED) star formation rate, log(SFRSED)\rm SFR_{SED})roman_SFR start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_SED end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) with its error, from GSWLC.

  • Column 8: Dust attenuation, AVsubscript𝐴VA_{\rm V}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in rest-frame V𝑉Vitalic_V, from GSWLC.

4 Discussion

4.1 Hyperfine ratio

The 1667 and 1665 MHz lines refer to the main lines of OH at the radio rest frequencies of 1667.359 and 1665.402 MHz, while two satellite lines are located at 1720.530 and 1612.231 MHz (Radford, 1964). In local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE), the OH line ratios are approximately 1:5:9:1 for 1612, 1665, 1667, and 1720 MHz lines (Henkel et al., 1991; Hess et al., 2021). The 1667 MHz line is relatively common in extragalactic observations, but the 1665 MHz line is very rare because of its weakness. McBride et al. (2013) reported that the hyperfine line ratio is 1<R1667:1665<101subscript𝑅:16671665101<R_{1667:1665}<101 < italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 10 with an average of R1667:16655subscript𝑅:166716655R_{1667:1665}\approx 5italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≈ 5. In previous observations (e.g., Darling & Giovanelli, 2000, 2001, 2002), the 1667 and 1665 MHz lines often blend into each other, resulting in a barely measurable line ratio. The main reason for this is the inherently large line width (>500kms1absent500kmsuperscripts1>500\,{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}> 500 roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) of the 1667 MHz line. In Table 2 we present the hyperfine line ratio between the integrated fluxes of 1667 and 1665 MHz. In total we have detected 27 OHMs, 9 of which show a visible 1665 MHz line. The detection rate is 33.3% for the 1665 MHz line. For detected sources, the line ratio R1667:1665subscript𝑅:16671665R_{1667:1665}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ranges from 1.32 to 15.22, with an average of R1667:1665=4.74subscript𝑅:166716654.74R_{1667:1665}=4.74italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.74, in agreement with the results reported by McBride et al. (2013). Although the hyperfine ratio is often consistent with the thermal emission condition (Baan et al., 1982), e.g. for IRAS 10558+3845 with R1667:1665=1.62±0.52subscript𝑅:16671665plus-or-minus1.620.52R_{1667:1665}=1.62\pm 0.52italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.62 ± 0.52, 11087+5351 with R1667:1665=1.32±0.21subscript𝑅:16671665plus-or-minus1.320.21R_{1667:1665}=1.32\pm 0.21italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.32 ± 0.21, and 12232+5532 with R1667:1665=1.54±0.18subscript𝑅:16671665plus-or-minus1.540.18R_{1667:1665}=1.54\pm 0.18italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.54 ± 0.18, which have relatively low hyperfine ratios with R1667:1665<2subscript𝑅:166716652R_{1667:1665}<2italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 2, McBride et al. (2013) suggested that the OH emission probably includes a significant non-thermal contribution. Furthermore, the wide range from 1.32 to 15.22 is indicative of complex maser pum** mechanisms.

4.2 Host galaxy properties

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Two-dimensional distributions of log(M)M_{\star})italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋆ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), log(SFRSED)\rm SFR_{SED})roman_SFR start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_SED end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), and AVsubscript𝐴VA_{\rm V}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The background shows all the data in the GSWLC. The blue triangles indicate cross-matched OHMs detected by FAST. The red dots indicate an additional 19 cross-matched OHMs not detected by FAST among the 154 known OHMs.

As expected, since the OHM sample was selected by cross-correlation with the IRAS-selected PSCz, which contains only objects with 60 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm flux densities >0.595absent0.595>0.595> 0.595 Jy, all of our detected OHMs are hosted by Luminous Infrared Galaxies (LIRGs) with LFIR>1011Lsubscript𝐿FIRsuperscript1011subscript𝐿direct-productL_{\rm FIR}>10^{11}L_{\odot}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, or ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) with FIR luminosities LFIR>1012Lsubscript𝐿FIRsuperscript1012subscript𝐿direct-productL_{\rm FIR}>10^{12}L_{\odot}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 12 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (e.g., Darling & Giovanelli, 2002). 13 OHMs are ULIRGs and 14 OHMs are LIRGs based on the measured LFIRsubscript𝐿FIRL_{\rm FIR}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, which ranges from 1011.70±0.03superscript10plus-or-minus11.700.0310^{11.70\pm 0.03}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 11.70 ± 0.03 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to 1012.43±0.01Lsuperscript10plus-or-minus12.430.01subscript𝐿direct-product10^{12.43\pm 0.01}L_{\odot}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 12.43 ± 0.01 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with a median of 1012.00±0.02Lsuperscript10plus-or-minus12.000.02subscript𝐿direct-product10^{12.00\pm 0.02}L_{\odot}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 12.00 ± 0.02 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This means that all of the 27 OHMs have relatively high FIR luminosities. The strong FIR emission suggest that such 27 OHMs has undergone a very recent and strong starburst (e.g., Sanders & Mirabel, 1996).

The majority of [U]LIRGs or OHMs show evidence of interaction with other galaxies or have recently undergone a galaxy merger (Andreasian & Alloin, 1994; Darling & Giovanelli, 2002). Mergers could be a way to funnel molecular gas into the core of the [U]LIRG, producing high molecular densities and stimulating the high star formation rates (Burdiuzha & Vikulov, 1990). Pihlström (2007) suggested that the maser emission may originate in thick, circumnuclear structures, based on the results of high-resolution imaging.

OHMs are likely a disturbed system in a galaxy merger, as evidenced by tidal tails (Clements et al., 1996). We found that almost all of the 27 OHMs have recently merged or interacted with another galaxy (see Figures 2 and 6). This could be an indication that such galaxy system is in the process of merging as seen in the optical morphology (see Figures 2 and 6). In general, OHM line emission is always detected in [U]LIRGs (e.g., Darling, 2007; Henkel & Wilson, 1990; Suess et al., 2016; Willett, 2012). It is likely that OHMs occur during a particular state or stage of the merger, which are consequences of tidal density enhancements that accompany galaxy interactions (Darling, 2007). In fact, very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI) radio images of Arp220 show that the OHM emission arises in regions only a few parsecs in size in its core, and have been used to support active galactic nucleus (AGN) models for this galaxy (Skinner et al., 1997).

The multi-wavelength SED fitting results in Figure 3 also show that the OH host galaxies are massive (M1011Msimilar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑀superscript1011subscript𝑀direct-productM_{\star}\simeq 10^{11}M_{\odot}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋆ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) galaxies with the SFR above the star-forming main sequence. The higher AVsubscript𝐴𝑉A_{V}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT value of the OH galaxies from the SED fit is also consistent with the high IR luminosities. On the other hand, not all ULIRGs have detectable OH emission, suggesting that the OH emission may be triggered within a specific stage of the merger or may be seen by orientation effects. High-resolution OH map** observations, e.g. with the Very Large Array (VLA), are still needed to better constrain the physical origin of the OH emission.

4.3 LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and LFIRsubscript𝐿FIRL_{\rm FIR}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Relationship

Refer to caption
Figure 4: LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs. LFIRsubscript𝐿FIRL_{\rm FIR}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distribution including 154 sources. The blue triangles indicate OHMs discovered by FASHI. The grey dots indicate previously known OHMs (Darling & Giovanelli, 2002, 2006; Willett, 2012; Suess et al., 2016; Hess et al., 2021; Glowacki et al., 2022; Jarvis et al., 2023), where the sources with LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT having only an upper limit are excluded from the current fitting statistics. The red dashed line shows the fitting result of the LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-LFIRsubscript𝐿FIRL_{\rm FIR}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relation.

OHMs are thought to be radiatively pumped by the FIR radiation field at 35 and 53 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm, with masing stimulated by 18 cm continuum emission from the surrounding environment (Henkel et al., 1987). In a simple scenario of low-gain unsaturated masing, the maser power is proportional to the pum** rate and the stimulated emission rate (Baan, 1989). If the observed OHM represents an ensemble of many individual masing regions with different saturation states, then the relationship between OH and FIR luminosity is LOHLFIR1<γ<2proportional-tosubscript𝐿OHsuperscriptsubscript𝐿FIR1𝛾2L_{\rm OH}\propto L_{\rm FIR}^{1<\gamma<2}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∝ italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 < italic_γ < 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (Baan, 1989; Darling & Giovanelli, 2002; Yun et al., 2001). The measurement of γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ has been frustrated by small samples, survey bias, and theoretical bias. Darling & Giovanelli (2002) derived the relationship between OH and far IR luminosity with 95 data points as logLOH=(1.57±0.11)logLFIR(15.76±1.22)logsubscript𝐿OHplus-or-minus1.570.11logsubscript𝐿FIRplus-or-minus15.761.22{\rm log}L_{\rm OH}=(1.57\pm 0.11){\rm log}L_{\rm FIR}-(15.76\pm 1.22)roman_log italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 1.57 ± 0.11 ) roman_log italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( 15.76 ± 1.22 ). In this work we detect 27 OHMs and 18 new OHMs, plus 127 other previously known OHMs with OH and FIR luminosities from the literature (Darling & Giovanelli, 2002, 2006; Willett, 2012; Suess et al., 2016; Hess et al., 2021; Glowacki et al., 2022), where 31 sources with LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT having only an upper limit are excluded from the current fitting statistics. Using the least-squares fitting method, the samples produce a fitting result with logLOH=(1.57±0.10)logLFIR(15.80±1.19)logsubscript𝐿OHplus-or-minus1.570.10logsubscript𝐿FIRplus-or-minus15.801.19{\rm log}L_{\rm OH}=(1.57\pm 0.10){\rm log}L_{\rm FIR}-(15.80\pm 1.19)roman_log italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 1.57 ± 0.10 ) roman_log italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( 15.80 ± 1.19 ) in Figure 4. The γ=1.57±0.10𝛾plus-or-minus1.570.10\gamma=1.57\pm 0.10italic_γ = 1.57 ± 0.10 agrees well with the result of Darling & Giovanelli (2002) with γ=1.57±0.11𝛾plus-or-minus1.570.11\gamma=1.57\pm 0.11italic_γ = 1.57 ± 0.11. Therefore, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ remains almost the same when the OHM samples reach up to 154, which is similar-to\sim1.6 times the number of previously known OHMs.

4.4 FAST OHM detectability

Refer to caption
Figure 5: LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vs. zsubscript𝑧direct-productz_{\odot}italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT distribution including 154 sources. The blue triangles indicate 18 new found OHMs by FASHI. The grey dots indicate detections of previously known OHMs (Darling & Giovanelli, 2002, 2006; Willett, 2012; Suess et al., 2016; Hess et al., 2021; Glowacki et al., 2022; Jarvis et al., 2023). Each grey dot with a down arrow indicates the source with LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT having only an upper limit.

Currently, the highest redshift detection of such an OHM in the main 1667 MHz OH emission line is J095903.22+025356.1 with a redshift of zOH=0.7092subscript𝑧OH0.7092z_{\rm OH}=0.7092italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.7092, recently found by Jarvis et al. (2023). The second highest is LADUMA J033046.20-275518.1 with a redshift of zOH=0.5225subscript𝑧OH0.5225z_{\rm OH}=0.5225italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.5225, found by Glowacki et al. (2022). However, the third highest redshift of OHMs is IRAS 00256-0208 with zOH=0.27656subscript𝑧OH0.27656z_{\rm OH}=0.27656italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.27656, found in this paper. The large gap (see Figure 5) between the three highest redshifts of OHMs requires more observatories to complete the OHM picture. The 19-beam receiver with FAST is capable of simultaneously covering a frequency range of 1000-1500 MHz, and the Ultra-Wide Bandwidth (UWB) receiver with FAST could simultaneously cover 500-3300 MHz. FAST will be a powerful instrument for observing highly redshifted OH emission in extragalactic objects (Zhang et al., 2023).

Furthermore, radio frequency interference (RFI) always affects the search results of astronomical observations for all radio telescopes on Earth. At present, the redshifts of all known OHMs are mainly below z0.27𝑧0.27z\approx 0.27italic_z ≈ 0.27 or f1310𝑓1310f\approx 1310italic_f ≈ 1310 MHz (Darling & Giovanelli, 2002; Willett, 2012; Haynes et al., 2018; Suess et al., 2016; Hess et al., 2021; Roberts et al., 2021), which is mainly due to the existence of strong RFI above z0.27𝑧0.27z\approx 0.27italic_z ≈ 0.27. From the statistics of RFI in the FAST 19-beam array (Zhang et al., 2023), we can see that there is a lot of seriously strong RFI from communication and navigation satellites, over two broad frequency bands in 1150-1310 and 1465-1500 MHz, corresponding to a redshift of 0.27z0.45less-than-or-similar-to0.27𝑧less-than-or-similar-to0.450.27\lesssim z\lesssim 0.450.27 ≲ italic_z ≲ 0.45 and 0.11z0.14less-than-or-similar-to0.11𝑧less-than-or-similar-to0.140.11\lesssim z\lesssim 0.140.11 ≲ italic_z ≲ 0.14, respectively. It is because the frequency band in 1310-1465 MHz is very clear that FAST has already detected 27 OHMs in this band. In addition, the RFI is bearable in the frequency band of 1050-1150 MHz or 0.45z0.55less-than-or-similar-to0.45𝑧less-than-or-similar-to0.550.45\lesssim z\lesssim 0.550.45 ≲ italic_z ≲ 0.55. Therefore, it is feasible to search for potential OHMs within 0.45z0.55less-than-or-similar-to0.45𝑧less-than-or-similar-to0.550.45\lesssim z\lesssim 0.550.45 ≲ italic_z ≲ 0.55 using FASHI data in the future.

Moreover, the FASHI data have detected 27 OHMs in the frequency range 1310-1465 MHz with a typical spectral detection sensitivity of similar-to\sim1.50 mJy at a spectral resolution of similar-to\sim6.4 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at 1.4 GHz (Zhang et al., 2024). The coverage of the current FASHI data is similar-to\sim10000 deg2. If FASHI observations cover similar-to\sim20000 deg2 in the future, FASHI is expected to obtain a total of 54 OHMs at the current detection sensitivity. If a longer integration time than the current FASHI drift survey is applied to each PSCz source, more OHMs would be extracted. Please note that the method of source identification in this work is to directly compare the PSCz catalog with the corresponding FASHI data cube to see if there are any emission lines (see Section 2.2). A blind and complete OHM identification throughout the FASHI data cube would expand the sample again, especially if OHMs can be hosted by galaxies with sub-LIRG far-IR luminosities. Thus, FASHI or FAST could provide great opportunities to detect more samples.

5 Summary

The FAST All Sky H I survey (FASHI) aims to cover the entire sky observable by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST), covering similar-to\sim22000 square degrees of declination between 14superscript14-14^{\circ}- 14 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and +66superscript66+66^{\circ}+ 66 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∘ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and in the frequency range of 1000-1500 MHz, with an expectation of detecting more than 100000 H I sources finally. At present, FASHI has observed more than 7600 square degrees. It has a typical spectral detection sensitivity of similar-to\sim1.50 mJy for a velocity resolution of similar-to\sim6.4 kms1kmsuperscripts1{\rm km~{}s}^{-1}roman_km roman_s start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at a frequency of similar-to\sim1.4 GHz. As of now, a total of 41741 extragalactic H I sources have been detected and released by FASHI.

To efficiently expand the OHM sample, we have directly cross-checked the PSCz catalog with the corresponding FASHI data cube. From 145 PSCz sources already covered by FASHI, we obtained 27 OHMs with a detection rate of 18.6%, including 9 previously known and 18 new ones, within a redshift range of 0.14314zOH0.27656less-than-or-similar-to0.14314subscript𝑧OHless-than-or-similar-to0.276560.14314\lesssim z_{\rm OH}\lesssim 0.276560.14314 ≲ italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ 0.27656. For 9 of the detected 27 OHMs, we also measured the hyperfine line ratio between the integrated fluxes of 1667 and 1665 MHz. The detection rate is 33.3% for the 1665 MHz line. The line ratio R1667:1665subscript𝑅:16671665R_{1667:1665}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ranges from 1.32 to 15.22, with an average of R1667:1665=4.74subscript𝑅:166716654.74R_{1667:1665}=4.74italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1667 : 1665 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 4.74, in agreement with the results reported by McBride et al. (2013).

We now have a total of 154 OHMs, including the 18 OHMs newly detected by FASHI. The full sample yields an LOHsubscript𝐿OHL_{\rm OH}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and LFIRsubscript𝐿FIRL_{\rm FIR}italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT relationship with logLOH=(1.57±0.10)logLFIR(15.80±1.19)logsubscript𝐿OHplus-or-minus1.570.10logsubscript𝐿FIRplus-or-minus15.801.19{\rm log}L_{\rm OH}=(1.57\pm 0.10){\rm log}L_{\rm FIR}-(15.80\pm 1.19)roman_log italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_OH end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( 1.57 ± 0.10 ) roman_log italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_FIR end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ( 15.80 ± 1.19 ), which agrees well with the result of Darling & Giovanelli (2002) that γ=1.57±0.11𝛾plus-or-minus1.570.11\gamma=1.57\pm 0.11italic_γ = 1.57 ± 0.11 from 95 data points. This indicates that γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ remains almost the same when the OHM samples reach up to similar-to\sim1.6 times the previously known OHMs.

Of the detected 27 OHMs of this work, 13 OHMs are ULIRGs and 14 OHMs are LIRGs, ranging from 1011.70±0.03superscript10plus-or-minus11.700.0310^{11.70\pm 0.03}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 11.70 ± 0.03 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT to 1012.43±0.01Lsuperscript10plus-or-minus12.430.01subscript𝐿direct-product10^{12.43\pm 0.01}L_{\odot}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 12.43 ± 0.01 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with a median of 1012.00±0.02Lsuperscript10plus-or-minus12.000.02subscript𝐿direct-product10^{12.00\pm 0.02}L_{\odot}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 12.00 ± 0.02 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. As expected, all 27 OHMs have relatively high FIR luminosities. This is because the OHM sample was selected by cross-correlation with the IRAS-selected PSCz. The multi-wavelength SED fitting results also show that the OH host galaxies for such 27 OHMs are massive (M1011Msimilar-to-or-equalssubscript𝑀superscript1011subscript𝑀direct-productM_{\star}\simeq 10^{11}M_{\odot}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⋆ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) galaxies with SFRs that place them above the star-forming main sequence. The higher AVsubscript𝐴𝑉A_{V}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT values for the OH hosts from the SED fit are also consistent with the high IR luminosities. On the other hand, not all ULIRGs have detectable OH emission, suggesting that the OH emission may be triggered within a specific stage of the merger or may have its visibility limited by orientation effects.

FAST, with its 19-beam array and UWB receiver, will be a powerful tool for observing more OHMs and unraveling their mystery in the future.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFA1602901). CPZ acknowledges support by the West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). CC and JLX are supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nos. 11803044, 11933003, 12173045, and 11933011. This work is sponsored (in part) by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), through a grant to the CAS South America Center for Astronomy (CASSACA). We acknowledge the science research grants from the China Manned Space Project with No. CMS-CSST-2021-A05. We also wish to thank the anonymous referee for comments that improved the clarity of the paper.

FAST is a Chinese national mega-science facility, operated by the National Astronomical Observatories of Chinese Academy of Sciences (NAOC). SDSS acknowledges support and resources from the Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah. The SDSS web site is www.sdss4.org. SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating Institutions of the SDSS Collaboration including the Brazilian Participation Group, the Carnegie Institution for Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Center for Astrophysics — Harvard & Smithsonian (CfA), the Chilean Participation Group, the French Participation Group, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, The Johns Hopkins University, Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU) / University of Tokyo, the Korean Participation Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Leibniz Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg), Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik (MPA Garching), Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE), National Astronomical Observatories of China, New Mexico State University, New York University, University of Notre Dame, Observatório Nacional / MCTI, The Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, United Kingdom Participation Group, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, University of Arizona, University of Colorado Boulder, University of Oxford, University of Portsmouth, University of Utah, University of Virginia, University of Washington, University of Wisconsin, Vanderbilt University, and Yale University.

References

  • Alatalo et al. (2016) Alatalo, K., Cales, S. L., Rich, J. A., et al. 2016, ApJS, 224, 38, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/38
  • Andreasian & Alloin (1994) Andreasian, N., & Alloin, D. 1994, A&AS, 107, 23
  • Baan (1989) Baan, W. A. 1989, ApJ, 338, 804, doi: 10.1086/167237
  • Baan (1991) Baan, W. A. 1991, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 16, Atoms, Ions and Molecules: New Results in Spectral Line Astrophysics, ed. A. D. Haschick & P. T. P. Ho, 45
  • Baan et al. (1992) Baan, W. A., Rhoads, J., Fisher, K., Altschuler, D. R., & Haschick, A. 1992, ApJ, 396, L99, doi: 10.1086/186526
  • Baan et al. (1982) Baan, W. A., Wood, P. A. D., & Haschick, A. D. 1982, ApJ, 260, L49, doi: 10.1086/183868
  • Briggs (1998) Briggs, F. H. 1998, A&A, 336, 815, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9710143
  • Burdiuzha & Vikulov (1990) Burdiuzha, V. V., & Vikulov, K. A. 1990, MNRAS, 244, 86
  • Clements et al. (1996) Clements, D. L., Sutherland, W. J., McMahon, R. G., & Saunders, W. 1996, MNRAS, 279, 477, doi: 10.1093/mnras/279.2.477
  • Darling (2007) Darling, J. 2007, ApJ, 669, L9, doi: 10.1086/523756
  • Darling & Giovanelli (2000) Darling, J., & Giovanelli, R. 2000, AJ, 119, 3003, doi: 10.1086/301403
  • Darling & Giovanelli (2001) —. 2001, AJ, 121, 1278, doi: 10.1086/319413
  • Darling & Giovanelli (2002) —. 2002, AJ, 124, 100, doi: 10.1086/341166
  • Darling & Giovanelli (2006) —. 2006, AJ, 132, 2596, doi: 10.1086/508513
  • Duarte Puertas et al. (2017) Duarte Puertas, S., Vilchez, J. M., Iglesias-Páramo, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629044
  • Giovanelli & Haynes (2015) Giovanelli, R., & Haynes, M. P. 2015, A&A Rev., 24, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-015-0085-3
  • Glowacki et al. (2022) Glowacki, M., Collier, J. D., Kazemi-Moridani, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac63b0
  • Haynes et al. (2018) Haynes, M. P., Giovanelli, R., Kent, B. R., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac956
  • Helou & Walker (1988) Helou, G., & Walker, D. W. 1988, 0. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6458812
  • Henkel et al. (1991) Henkel, C., Baan, W. A., & Mauersberger, R. 1991, A&A Rev., 3, 47, doi: 10.1007/BF00873457
  • Henkel et al. (1987) Henkel, C., Guesten, R., & Baan, W. A. 1987, A&A, 185, 14
  • Henkel & Wilson (1990) Henkel, C., & Wilson, T. L. 1990, A&A, 229, 431
  • Hess et al. (2021) Hess, K. M., Roberts, H., Dénes, H., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A193, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040019
  • Hou et al. (2009) Hou, L. G., Wu, X.-B., & Han, J. L. 2009, ApJ, 704, 789, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/789
  • Jarvis et al. (2023) Jarvis, M. J., Heywood, I., Jewell, S. M., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.04345. https://arxiv.longhoe.net/abs/2312.04345
  • Jiang et al. (2019) Jiang, P., Yue, Y., Gan, H., et al. 2019, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 62, 959502, doi: 10.1007/s11433-018-9376-1
  • Jiang et al. (2020) Jiang, P., Tang, N.-Y., Hou, L.-G., et al. 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 064, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/20/5/64
  • **g et al. (2024) **g, Y., Wang, J., Xu, C., et al. 2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 259514, doi: 10.1007/s11433-023-2333-8
  • Kim et al. (1998) Kim, D. C., Veilleux, S., & Sanders, D. B. 1998, ApJ, 508, 627, doi: 10.1086/306409
  • Lin et al. (2018) Lin, Y.-T., Huang, H.-J., & Chen, Y.-C. 2018, AJ, 155, 188, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aab5b4
  • Liu et al. (2024) Liu, Z., Wang, J., **g, Y., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.08278, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.08278
  • Lo (2005) Lo, K. Y. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 625, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094927
  • Lockett & Elitzur (2008) Lockett, P., & Elitzur, M. 2008, ApJ, 677, 985, doi: 10.1086/533429
  • McBride et al. (2013) McBride, J., Heiles, C., & Elitzur, M. 2013, ApJ, 774, 35, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/35
  • Murata et al. (2017) Murata, K. L., Yamada, R., Oyabu, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 39, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1902
  • Nan et al. (2011) Nan, R., Li, D., **, C., et al. 2011, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 20, 989, doi: 10.1142/S0218271811019335
  • Nikutta et al. (2014) Nikutta, R., Hunt-Walker, N., Nenkova, M., Ivezić, Ž., & Elitzur, M. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 3361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1087
  • Osterbrock (1989) Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei
  • Pihlström (2007) Pihlström, Y. M. 2007, in Astrophysical Masers and their Environments, ed. J. M. Chapman & W. A. Baan, Vol. 242, 446–451, doi: 10.1017/S1743921307013579
  • Radford (1964) Radford, H. E. 1964, Phys. Rev. Lett., 13, 534, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.534
  • Roberts et al. (2021) Roberts, H., Darling, J., & Baker, A. J. 2021, ApJ, 911, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe944
  • Salim et al. (2016) Salim, S., Lee, J. C., Janowiecki, S., et al. 2016, ApJS, 227, 2, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/2
  • Sanders & Mirabel (1996) Sanders, D. B., & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.749
  • Saunders et al. (2000) Saunders, W., Sutherland, W. J., Maddox, S. J., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 55, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03528.x
  • Skinner et al. (1997) Skinner, C. J., Smith, H. A., Sturm, E., et al. 1997, Nature, 386, 472, doi: 10.1038/386472a0
  • Suess et al. (2016) Suess, K. A., Darling, J., Haynes, M. P., & Giovanelli, R. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 220, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw666
  • Toba et al. (2014) Toba, Y., Oyabu, S., Matsuhara, H., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/45
  • Veilleux et al. (1999) Veilleux, S., Kim, D. C., & Sanders, D. B. 1999, ApJ, 522, 113, doi: 10.1086/307634
  • Veilleux et al. (1995) Veilleux, S., Kim, D. C., Sanders, D. B., Mazzarella, J. M., & Soifer, B. T. 1995, ApJS, 98, 171, doi: 10.1086/192158
  • Weedman & Houck (2008) Weedman, D. W., & Houck, J. R. 2008, ApJ, 686, 127, doi: 10.1086/591123
  • Wiggins et al. (2016) Wiggins, B. K., Migenes, V., & Smidt, J. M. 2016, ApJ, 816, 55, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/55
  • Willett (2012) Willett, K. W. 2012, in Cosmic Masers - from OH to H0, ed. R. S. Booth, W. H. T. Vlemmings, & E. M. L. Humphreys, Vol. 287, 345–349, doi: 10.1017/S1743921312007284
  • Wright (2006) Wright, E. L. 2006, PASP, 118, 1711, doi: 10.1086/510102
  • Yun et al. (2001) Yun, M. S., Reddy, N. A., & Condon, J. J. 2001, ApJ, 554, 803, doi: 10.1086/323145
  • Zhang et al. (2022) Zhang, C.-P., Xu, J.-L., Wang, J., et al. 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 025015, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ac3f2d
  • Zhang et al. (2023) Zhang, C.-P., Jiang, P., Zhu, M., et al. 2023, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 075016, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/acd58e
  • Zhang et al. (2024) Zhang, C.-P., Zhu, M., Jiang, P., et al. 2024, SCPMA, 67, 219511, doi: 10.1007/s11433-023-2219-7
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: See caption in Figure 2
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6 (Continued): See caption in Figure 2
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6 (Continued): See caption in Figure 2
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6 (Continued): See caption in Figure 2
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6 (Continued): See caption in Figure 2
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6 (Continued): See caption in Figure 2
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6 (Continued): See caption in Figure 2