Lemma 3.10.
Let , , and
be a rational -fold sphere map of degree in reduced terms,
that is,
it takes -spheres to -spheres, where all s are distinct and for .
Let .
Then for ,
there is a real polynomial of bidegree at most such that
|
|
|
which becomes
|
|
|
and
for ,
is constant on the -sphere and equals
.
Moreover, if ,
then is of degree at most .
Proof.
The result is trivial if is constant, so we assume otherwise.
The proof is essentially the same as that of LemmaΒ 3.3.
We prove the result by induction on .
For ,
on the -sphere,
equals and so is constant on the -sphere.
Rearranging,
|
|
|
on the -sphere,
so that there is a real polynomial such that
|
|
|
that is,
|
|
|
We get
|
|
|
outside the pole set.
As is a nonconstant rational map that takes -sphere to -sphere,
it is a rational proper map of
to .
ByΒ [dangelo-2019-hermitian]*PropositionΒ 5.1, .
As is of bidegree and is of bidegree at most , is of bidegree .
As for , is constant and equals on
the -sphere, is constant on the -sphere and equals
|
|
|
Suppose that for some , ,
there is a real polynomial of bidegree at most such that
|
|
|
and for ,
is constant on the -sphere and equals
.
Now, is constant on the -sphere.
Rearranging,
|
|
|
on the -sphere,
so that there is a real polynomial such that
(3) |
|
|
|
We get
|
|
|
outside the pole set.
As for , is constant on
the -sphere and equals , is constant on the -sphere and equals
|
|
|
Moreover,
,
that is,
|
|
|
If , then
|
|
|
As is of bidegree at most , is of bidegree at most .
If ,
suppose for contradiction that the degree of is bigger than .
As is of bidegree at most and is of bidegree , is of bidegree .
Collecting bidegree- terms on both sides of 3 and using the notation from 3.8, we get
|
|
|
By Huangβs lemmaΒ [huang-1999-linearity]*LemmaΒ 3.2, a product of
that is not zero cannot be a sum or difference of fewer than
hermitian squares, and so
|
|
|
as and , contradicting .
Thus is of degree at most .
As both and are of bidegree at most ,
is of bidegree at most .
The result then follows by induction.
β
Proof.
Let .
By LemmaΒ 3.10,
for ,
there is a real polynomial of bidegree at most such that
|
|
|
Inductively, we get
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where is a real polynomial of bidegree at most .
For , this becomes formally a degree- Newton polynomial of
that passes through the points .
β
Proof.
By LemmaΒ 3.11,
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
is
a polynomial of ,
and is of bidegree at most , hence zero.
Thus outside the set where , we have
.
Suppose that is in lowest terms.
As takes -sphere to -sphere, is not zero, and so
has a power series expansion at the origin,
and hence so does .
The (infinite) matrix of coefficients of this power series is
positive semidefnite (being a squared norm)
and as the
matrix of coefficients of is a principal submatrix of this
infinite matrix, it is itself positive semidefinite.
Thus there is a polynomial map such that
. But then
for some unitary matrix near the origin, again using the result of DβAngelo.
This means that and
so is a polynomial.
Since is a polynomial -fold sphere map, it is a polynomial -fold sphere map, so by TheoremΒ 3.5,
it is an -fold sphere map and takes all zero-centric spheres to zero-centric spheres.
β
Proof.
Take any arbitrary degree- polynomial function , that is,
of the form , which after a unitary transformation becomes with , which after another unitary transformation becomes with .
If is the denominator of a rational map, can be scaled to have .
Thus without loss of generality, assume that .
Take arbitrary distinct for .
Consider the bidegree- real polynomial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which is constant on for all .
Choose such that
|
|
|
write
|
|
|
and consider
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
We see that
for , each , so that each ,
and for ,
each and each , so that
each .
Thus the matrix of coefficients of is positive definite.
Now consider
|
|
|
|
As , we get that , and
the matrix approaches , which is positive definite.
This means that is also positive definite for small enough .
Thus there is a polynomial map such that
.
Finally, we form
|
|
|
This gives us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, has a finite bidegree and hence
can be divisible by for only a finite number of values of .
So assume that is small enough so that does not divide .
We see that is constant on for only due to the term
and gives a rational map in reduced terms
|
|
|
Replacing with a more general denominator with small enough nonzero gives a rational map in reduced terms
(4) |
|
|
|
This defines a family of maps for some , where
each member is a rational -fold sphere map of degree of that is not a -fold sphere map.
β
Proof.
The first part of the statement follows from Theorem 3.12.
Suppose the degree of the polynomial is . To obtain the stated presentation of , we use the expression of in TheoremΒ 3.5:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where is a constant, and maps a sphere of radius centered at the origin to a sphere of radius centered at the origin.
Now as is a degree- polynomial, is a bidegree- polynomial in the coordinates , and it must be of the above form. Thus is of the form:
|
|
|
where the s are nonnegative real numbers, and since is a polynomial map** of degree . Set (where is the constant map** ),
the scaled and symmetrized -fold tensor of the identity map with itself.
Suppose are exactly the degrees for which .
Let .
Then is a -fold
sphere map with linearly independent components. We have that for all ,
thus by a result of DβAngeloΒ [dangelo-1993-several], after possibly adding zero components to ,
there is a unitary such that (5) holds.
β