Charmonium production in hot magnetized hyperonic matter
– effects of baryonic Dirac sea and PV mixing

Amruta Mishra [email protected] Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas New Delhi 110016 India    Arvind Kumar [email protected] Department of Physics, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar, Punjab 144008 India    S.P. Misra [email protected] Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar – 751005, India
Abstract

We investigate the medium modifications of the masses of pseudoscalar open charm (D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) mesons and the charmonium state (ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 )) in hot isospin asymmetric strange hadronic medium in the presence of an external magnetic field within a chiral effective model. The in-medium partial decay widths of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) to charged and neutral DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons are computed from the medium modifications of the masses of the initial and final state mesons. These are computed using two light quark pair creation models - (I) the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model and (II) a field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons with quark (and antiquark) constituents. The production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), arising from scattering of the D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons, are computed from the relativistic Breit-Wigner spectral function expressed in terms of the in-medium masses and the decay widths of the charmonium state. The effects of the magnetic field are considered due to the Dirac sea (DS) of the baryons, the mixing of the pseudoscalar (S𝑆Sitalic_S=0) and vector (S𝑆Sitalic_S=1) meson (PV mixing), the Landau level contributions for the charged hadrons. The anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) of the baryons are also taken into account in the present study. For magnetized nuclear matter, at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the effect of Dirac sea leads to inverse magnetic catalysis (IMC), which is drop of the magnitude of the light quark condensates (proportional to the scalar fields) with increase in the magnetic field, contrary to the opposite effect of magnetic catalysis (MC) at ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0. The inclusion of hyperons to the nuclear medium is observed to lead to magnetic catalysis. There are observed to be significant effects from the DS and PV mixing on the properties of the charm mesons. The production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) arising due to scattering of D+D(D0D¯0)superscript𝐷superscript𝐷superscript𝐷0superscript¯𝐷0D^{+}D^{-}(D^{0}\bar{D}^{0})italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) mesons in the hot magnetized strange hadronic matter are observed to have distinct peak positions, when the magnetic field is large. This is because the production cross-sections have contributions from the transverse as well as longitudinal components of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), which have non-degenerate masses due to PV (ψ(3770)ηc𝜓3770superscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\psi(3770)-\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) mixing. These can have observable consequences on the dilepton spectra as well as on the production of the charm mesons in ultra-relativistic peripheral heavy ion collision experiments, where the produced magnetic field is huge.

I Introduction

Probing the properties of hadrons at finite density and/or temperature is an important and challenging topic of research as it can have implications in understanding the experimental observables from heavy-ion collision experiments as well as has relevance in the physics of compact objects Vachaspati1991 ; Durrer2013 . It has been estimated that magnetic fields of the order of 2mπ22superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋22m_{\pi}^{2}2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in relativistic heavy-ion collider (RHIC) at BNL, USA and of around 15mπ215superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋215m_{\pi}^{2}15 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in large hadron collider (LHC) at CERN can be produced in non-central heavy-ion collisions, which has initiated lots of studies on the in-medium properties of hadrons under strong magnetic field background Kharzeev2008 ; Fukushima2008 ; Skovov2009 . Strong magnetic fields are also expected to exist in the dense astrophysical objects, e.g, the magnetars Roberto15 ; manisha23 ; Monika23 and also play an important role in the physics of early universe Vachaspati1991 ; Durrer2013 .

The presence of intense magnetic field leads to many interesting physical phenomenon such as magnetic catalysis (MC), inverse magnetic catalysis (IMC), chiral magnetic effect (CME), chiral magnetic wave Gusynin2012 ; Bali2012 ; Bali2013 ; Kharzeev2011 ; Huang2023 . The time evolution of magnetic field produced in heavy-ion collisions is however still debatable. The strength of magnetic field may decay rapidly in vacuum, but the strongly interacting medium may cause a delay in the decay and hence an increase in the life-time of magnetic field. As discussed in Ref. Huang2023 , the decay time of the magnetic field in the medium may increase due to conducting medium formed by charged particles and hence induction effects Gupta2004 . The strong magnetic field produced during the initial stages of heavy-ion collisions can have imprints on the experimental observables related to hadrons composed of heavy quarks as these are also produced during that stage, for example, the splitting of the directed flow v1subscript𝑣1v_{1}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons Coci2018 .

The properties of light and heavy meson are studied in the external magnetic field at zero temperature and zero baryonic density Andreichikov2013 ; Machado2014 ; Carlomagno2022 ; Yoshida2016 . The non-perturbative methods such as relativistic mean field (RMF) models Lattimer2000 ; Lattimer2002 ; Sinha2013 ; Rabhi2011 , Nambu Jona Lasinio (NJL) DMenezes2009 and their polyakov extended versions (PNJL) Moreira2021 ; Wang2022 , quark meson coupling model Yue2008 , chiral hadronic model Dexheimer2012 , chiral quark mean field model Manisha2022 ; Nisha2023 , QCD sum rule approach, confined isospin density dependent model Chu2018 etc., have been used in the literature to investigate the impact of external magnetic field on the quark matter, nuclear matter and compact star properties. The importance of magnetized Dirac sea in the calculations of the properties of magnetized matter and its role in observation of (inverse) magnetic catalysis effect have been explored in Refs. Menezes2009 ; haber2014 ; Arghya2018 . In Ref. haber2014 , the vacuum to nuclear matter phase transition was studied using Walecka model as well as an extended linear sigma model, considering Dirac sea of nucleons but neglecting the anomalous magnetic moments of the nucleons. The phenomenon of magnetic catalysis, i.e., the enhancement of chiral condensates with increasing magnetic field, was observed in this work haber2014 . In Ref. Arghya2018 , the effects of Dirac sea of nucleons on the vacuum to nuclear matter phase transition were studied within the Walecka model considering finite anomalous magnetic moments of nucleons, and, using the weak magnetic field approximation for computing the nucleon self energy by summation of tadpole diagrams. The anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) of nucleons were observed to play a crucial role. The magnetic catalysis effect was observed at zero temperature and zero baryon density with as well as without consideration of AMMs. However, at finite temperature and baryonic density, the inverse magnetic catalysis was observed in the presence of AMMs of the nucleons, which was observed to be magnetic catalysis when the AMMs were ignored. The impact of Dirac sea on the properties of nuclear matter using quantum hadrodynamic (QHD) model and performing calculations using covariant propagators Aguirre_Paoli_2016 for the nucleons with complete effect of magnetic field and anomalous magnetic moments of nucleons has been investigated in Ref. Aguirre2019 . The phenomenon of inverse magnetic catalysis was also reported in some lattice QCD calculations Bali2013 , where the critical temperature, Tcsubscript𝑇𝑐T_{c}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT was observed to decrease with increase in the magnetic field. The effects of the Dirac sea for quark matter were investigated using NJL model in Menezes2009 ; DMenezes2009 . The phenomenon of inverse magnetic catalysis was observed in a study of magnetic effects on chiral phase transition in a modified AdS/QCD model Danning2016 ; Fang2016 .

The properties of heavy flavour mesons at finite density and temperature, have been explored extensively in the past, both for zero as well as finite magnetic field background. In Refs. amarindam ; amarvdmesonTprc , the properties of pseudoscalar D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons were studied in nuclear matter at finite temperatures within a chiral SU(3) model paper3 , generalized to SU(4) sector to include the interactions of the charmed mesons. The properties of open charmed mesons and charmonium states have been studied in strange hadronic matter in Refs. amarvepja ; Pathak12015 . The chiral SU(3) model has also been generalized to SU(5) sector to study the properties of bottom mesons in nuclear and strange hadronic matter Pathak22015 ; Pathak12014 ; Pathak22014 . The chiral model has also been extended to study the impact of strong magnetic field on open charm mesons, open bottom mesons, charmonium and bottomonium properties in nuclear medium in Refs. Reddy2018 ; Dhale2018 ; Amal2018 ; charmdecay_mag ; upsilon_mag . The conjunction of chiral SU(3) model and QCD sum rule approach has also been used to study the properties of open and hidden heavy mesons at finite density and temperature for nonzero magnetic field Rajesh2020 ; Rajesh22020 ; MishraD2018 ; Parui2021 . In the presence of finite strong magnetic field the phenomenon of PV mixing which accounts for the interaction of pseudoscalar mesons with the longitudinal component of vector mesons has been studied in context of heavy flavored mesons in Refs. charmdw_mag ; open_charm_mag_AM_SPM ; upslndw_mag . Recently, chiral SU(3) model is generalized to explore the impact of magnetized Dirac sea on the in-medium properties of different mesons Parui_D12023 ; Ankit_D12023 ; Parui22022 ; HQ_DW_DS_AM_SPM_2023 ; Sourodeep2023 . Within effective SU(4) model the properties of charmed mesons were studied in the nuclear matter at zero temperature, in the presence of strong external magnetic field including the impact of Dirac sea Sourodeep2023 . The magnetized Dirac sea along with finite anomalous magnetic moment of nucleons is observed to lead to the phenomenon of inverse magnetic catalysis at finite densities for symmetric as well as asymmetric nuclear matter in presence of strong magnetic fields. The effects of the magnetized Dirac sea on the spectral properties of light vector and axial-vector mesons in hot magnetized nuclear matter have also been studied recently using a QCD sum rule approach in Ref. Parui_D32023 .

In peripheral ultra-relativistic heavy ion collision experiments (where strong magnetic fields are created), since the matter produced is extremely dilute, we study the decay width of the charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), which is the lowest state which decay to DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in vacuum. In the present work, we investigate the in-medium masses of pseudoscalar D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons and charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) and their effect on the partial decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter at finite temperatures in presence of a strong magnetic field. The effects of the magnetized baryon Dirac sea contributions as well as the PV mixing (the mixing of the pseudoscalar meson (S=0) and the longitudinal component of the vector meson (S=1)) on the masses of the charmed mesons are taken into consideration. The influence of magnetized Dirac sea of nucleons (p,n𝑝𝑛p,nitalic_p , italic_n) and hyperons (Λ,Σ±,0,Ξ,0ΛsuperscriptΣplus-or-minus0superscriptΞ0\Lambda,\Sigma^{\pm,0},\Xi^{-,0}roman_Λ , roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± , 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - , 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) on the meson masses are explored, accounting for the finite anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) of the baryons. Additionally, the lowest Landau level contributions are considered for the charged open charm mesons. The decay width of heavy quarkonium state to open heavy flavour mesons, arising due to the mass modifications of the initial and final state mesons, are computed using (I) the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model yaouanc1 ; friman for the charm sector, as well as (II) a field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons with quark (and antiquark) constituents for both charm and bottom sectors spm781 ; spm782 ; amspmwg ; amspm_upsilon ; charmdw_mag ; HQ_DW_DS_AM_SPM_2023 . In both of these models, the charmonium decay proceeds through creation of a light quark-antiquark pair and the heavy charm quark (antiquark) combines with the light antiquark (quark) to form DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in the final state. The impact of PV mixing on the in-medium properties of open charm and charmonium sates are observed to be quite significant in the present work. The well-separated non-degenerate masses of the longitudinal and transverse components of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) due to PV mixing is observed to be at distinct peak positions in the production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) due to scattering of the D+D(D0D0¯)superscript𝐷superscript𝐷superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{+}D^{-}(D^{0}\bar{D^{0}})italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) mesons, when the magnetic field is large.

Following is the outline of this paper: in section II we give a brief description of the chiral effective model used to calculate the masses of the charmed mesons in the finite temperature magnetized matter at zero density as well as for isospin asymmetric (strange) hadronic matter. In section III, the procedure to calculate the in-medium masses of D𝐷Ditalic_D, D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG and the charmonium ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) and the medium modifications of the decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG due to the mass modifications of these mesons is described. The computation of the decay widths using the light quark-antiquark pair creation models – (I) the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model and (II) a field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons with quark (and antiquark) constituents, are briefly described in this section. The results and discussions of the present study are given in section IV and the work is summarized in section V.

II Chiral effective model

In this section we briefly describe the chiral effective model used in the present work to study the in-medium properties of charmed mesons at finite temperatures in the presence of an external magnetic field, for zero density as well as in isospin asymmetric (strange) hadronic matter. A chiral SU(3) model incorporating the nonlinear realization of chiral symmetry paper3 ; Weinberg68 ; coleman ; Bardeen69 and the broken scale invariance property of QCD paper3 ; hartree ; kristof1 is genralized to SU(4) to include the interactions of the charm mesons amarindam ; amarvepja . The Lagrangian density of chiral SU(3) model is written as paper3

=kin+W=X,Y,V,A,uBW+vec+0+scalebreak+SB+mag.subscript𝑘𝑖𝑛subscript𝑊𝑋𝑌𝑉𝐴𝑢subscript𝐵𝑊subscript𝑣𝑒𝑐subscript0subscript𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑘subscript𝑆𝐵subscript𝑚𝑎𝑔{\cal L}={\cal L}_{kin}+\sum_{W=X,Y,V,A,u}{\cal L}_{BW}+{\cal L}_{vec}+{\cal L% }_{0}+{\cal L}_{scale\;break}+{\cal L}_{SB}+{\cal L}_{mag}.caligraphic_L = caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k italic_i italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_W = italic_X , italic_Y , italic_V , italic_A , italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_W end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v italic_e italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c italic_a italic_l italic_e italic_b italic_r italic_e italic_a italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (1)

In Eq.(1), kinsubscript𝑘𝑖𝑛{\cal L}_{kin}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k italic_i italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the kinetic energy term, BWsubscript𝐵𝑊{\cal L}_{BW}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_W end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the baryon-meson interaction term in which the baryons-spin-0 meson interaction term generates the baryon masses. vecsubscript𝑣𝑒𝑐{\cal L}_{vec}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v italic_e italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT describes the dynamical mass generation of the vector mesons via couplings to the scalar mesons and contain additionally quartic self-interactions of the vector fields. 0subscript0{\cal L}_{0}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT contains the meson-meson interaction terms, scalebreaksubscript𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑘{\cal L}_{scale\;break}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c italic_a italic_l italic_e italic_b italic_r italic_e italic_a italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the scale invariance breaking term expressed in terms of logarthimic potential of a dilaton field, SBsubscript𝑆𝐵{\cal L}_{SB}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT describes the explicit chiral symmetry breaking. The last term magsubscript𝑚𝑎𝑔{\cal L}_{mag}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT describes the interaction of the baryons with the electromagnetic field.

In the present study of isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter at finite magnetic field, we adopt the mean field approximation, in which the meson fields are replaced by their expectation values. The meson fields which have non-zero expectation values are the scalar (σ,ζ,δ)\sigma,\zeta,\delta)italic_σ , italic_ζ , italic_δ ) and the vector fields, ωμωδμ0superscript𝜔𝜇𝜔superscript𝛿𝜇0\omega^{\mu}\rightarrow\omega\delta^{\mu 0}italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_ω italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, ρμaρδμ0δa3superscript𝜌𝜇𝑎𝜌superscript𝛿𝜇0subscript𝛿𝑎3\rho^{\mu a}\rightarrow\rho\delta^{\mu 0}\delta_{a3}italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_ρ italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and, ϕμϕδμ0superscriptitalic-ϕ𝜇italic-ϕsuperscript𝛿𝜇0\phi^{\mu}\rightarrow\phi\delta^{\mu 0}italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → italic_ϕ italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and, the expectation values of the other mesons are zero. We also use the approximations ψ¯iψjδijψ¯iψiδijρissubscript¯𝜓𝑖subscript𝜓𝑗subscript𝛿𝑖𝑗delimited-⟨⟩subscript¯𝜓𝑖subscript𝜓𝑖subscript𝛿𝑖𝑗superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑖𝑠\bar{\psi}_{i}\psi_{j}\rightarrow\delta_{ij}\langle\bar{\psi}_{i}\psi_{i}% \rangle\equiv\delta_{ij}\rho_{i}^{s}over¯ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ ≡ italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ψ¯iγμψjδijδμ0ψ¯iγ0ψiδijδμ0ρisubscript¯𝜓𝑖superscript𝛾𝜇subscript𝜓𝑗subscript𝛿𝑖𝑗superscript𝛿𝜇0delimited-⟨⟩subscript¯𝜓𝑖superscript𝛾0subscript𝜓𝑖subscript𝛿𝑖𝑗superscript𝛿𝜇0subscript𝜌𝑖\bar{\psi}_{i}\gamma^{\mu}\psi_{j}\rightarrow\delta_{ij}\delta^{\mu 0}\langle% \bar{\psi}_{i}\gamma^{0}\psi_{i}\rangle\equiv\delta_{ij}\delta^{\mu 0}\rho_{i}over¯ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT → italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ ≡ italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where, ρissuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑖𝑠\rho_{i}^{s}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ρisubscript𝜌𝑖\rho_{i}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the scalar and number density of baryon of species, i𝑖iitalic_i. In the above approximation, the terms which contribute to the baryon-meson interaction, BWsubscript𝐵𝑊{\cal L}_{BW}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_W end_POSTSUBSCRIPT of equation (1) arise from the interactions due to the scalar (S) and the vector (V) mesons, and, is given as

BS+BV=iψ¯i(gσiσ+gζiζ+gδiδgωiγ0ωgρiγ0ρgϕiγ0ϕ)ψi.subscript𝐵𝑆subscript𝐵𝑉subscript𝑖superscript¯𝜓𝑖subscript𝑔𝜎𝑖𝜎subscript𝑔𝜁𝑖𝜁subscript𝑔𝛿𝑖𝛿subscript𝑔𝜔𝑖superscript𝛾0𝜔subscript𝑔𝜌𝑖superscript𝛾0𝜌subscript𝑔italic-ϕ𝑖superscript𝛾0italic-ϕsuperscript𝜓𝑖{\cal L}_{BS}+{\cal L}_{BV}=\sum_{i}{\bar{\psi}}^{i}(g_{\sigma i}\sigma+g_{% \zeta i}\zeta+g_{\delta i}\delta-g_{\omega i}\gamma^{0}\omega-g_{\rho i}\gamma% ^{0}\rho-g_{\phi i}\gamma^{0}\phi)\psi^{i}.caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_S end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ ) italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT . (2)

The effective mass of the baryon of species i𝑖iitalic_i is obtained from the in-medium values of the scalar-isoscalar non-strange (σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ) and strange (ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ) mesons and the scalar-isovector (δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ) meson and is given as

mi=gσiσgζiζgδiδ,superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑔𝜎𝑖𝜎subscript𝑔𝜁𝑖𝜁subscript𝑔𝛿𝑖𝛿m_{i}^{*}=-g_{\sigma i}\sigma-g_{\zeta i}\zeta-g_{\delta i}\delta,italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ , (3)

and the effective chemical potential for i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, due to the interaction with the vector mesons (ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω, ρ𝜌\rhoitalic_ρ and ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ) is given as

μi=μigωiωgρiρgϕiϕsubscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖subscript𝜇𝑖subscript𝑔𝜔𝑖𝜔subscript𝑔𝜌𝑖𝜌subscript𝑔italic-ϕ𝑖italic-ϕ\mu^{*}_{i}=\mu_{i}-g_{\omega i}\omega-g_{\rho i}\rho-g_{\phi i}\phiitalic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_μ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ (4)

The other terms in the Lagrangian density of equation (1) are given as

vecsubscript𝑣𝑒𝑐\displaystyle{\cal L}_{vec}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v italic_e italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =12χ2χ02(mω2ω2+mρ2ρ2+mϕ2ϕ2)+g44(ω4+2ϕ4+6ω2ρ2+ρ4)absent12superscript𝜒2superscriptsubscript𝜒02superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜔2superscript𝜔2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜌2superscript𝜌2superscriptsubscript𝑚italic-ϕ2superscriptitalic-ϕ2superscriptsubscript𝑔44superscript𝜔42superscriptitalic-ϕ46superscript𝜔2superscript𝜌2superscript𝜌4\displaystyle=\frac{1}{2}\frac{\chi^{2}}{\chi_{0}^{2}}\Big{(}m_{\omega}^{2}% \omega^{2}+m_{\rho}^{2}\rho^{2}+m_{\phi}^{2}\phi^{2}\Big{)}+g_{4}^{4}(\omega^{% 4}+2\phi^{4}+6\omega^{2}\rho^{2}+\rho^{4})= divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 6 italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) (5)
0subscript0\displaystyle{\cal L}_{0}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =12k0χ2(σ2+ζ2+δ2)+k1(σ2+ζ2+δ2)2absent12subscript𝑘0superscript𝜒2superscript𝜎2superscript𝜁2superscript𝛿2subscript𝑘1superscriptsuperscript𝜎2superscript𝜁2superscript𝛿22\displaystyle=-\frac{1}{2}k_{0}\chi^{2}(\sigma^{2}+\zeta^{2}+\delta^{2})+k_{1}% (\sigma^{2}+\zeta^{2}+\delta^{2})^{2}= - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ζ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ζ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT
+k2(σ42+δ42+ζ4+3σ2δ2)+k3χ(σ2δ2)ζk4χ4subscript𝑘2superscript𝜎42superscript𝛿42superscript𝜁43superscript𝜎2superscript𝛿2subscript𝑘3𝜒superscript𝜎2superscript𝛿2𝜁subscript𝑘4superscript𝜒4\displaystyle+k_{2}(\frac{\sigma^{4}}{2}+\frac{\delta^{4}}{2}+\zeta^{4}+3% \sigma^{2}\delta^{2})+k_{3}\chi(\sigma^{2}-\delta^{2})\zeta-k_{4}\chi^{4}+ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG + italic_ζ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 3 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_ζ - italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (6)
scalebreaksubscript𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑘\displaystyle{\cal L}_{scale\;break}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c italic_a italic_l italic_e italic_b italic_r italic_e italic_a italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =14χ4lnχ4χ04+d3χ4ln((σ2δ2)ζσ02ζ0(χχ0)3),absent14superscript𝜒4lnsuperscript𝜒4superscriptsubscript𝜒04𝑑3superscript𝜒4lnsuperscript𝜎2superscript𝛿2𝜁superscriptsubscript𝜎02subscript𝜁0superscript𝜒subscript𝜒03\displaystyle=-\frac{1}{4}\chi^{4}{\rm ln}\frac{\chi^{4}}{\chi_{0}^{4}}+\frac{% d}{3}\chi^{4}{\rm ln}\Bigg{(}\frac{\left(\sigma^{2}-\delta^{2}\right)\zeta}{% \sigma_{0}^{2}\zeta_{0}}\Big{(}\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}\Big{)}^{3}\Bigg{)},= - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ln divide start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ln ( divide start_ARG ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_ζ end_ARG start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , (7)
SBsubscript𝑆𝐵\displaystyle{\cal L}_{SB}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =(χχ0)2[mπ2fπσ+(2mK2fK12mπ2fπ)ζ],absentsuperscript𝜒subscript𝜒02delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋𝜎2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝐾2subscript𝑓𝐾12superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋𝜁\displaystyle=-\left(\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}\right)^{2}\left[m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}% \sigma+\left(\sqrt{2}m_{K}^{2}f_{K}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}\right% )\zeta\right],= - ( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ + ( square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_ζ ] , (8)

and,

mag=ψi¯qiγμAμψi12κiψi¯σμνFμνψi14FμνFμν.subscript𝑚𝑎𝑔¯subscript𝜓𝑖subscript𝑞𝑖subscript𝛾𝜇superscript𝐴𝜇subscript𝜓𝑖12subscript𝜅𝑖¯subscript𝜓𝑖superscript𝜎𝜇𝜈subscript𝐹𝜇𝜈subscript𝜓𝑖14superscript𝐹𝜇𝜈subscript𝐹𝜇𝜈{\cal L}_{mag}=-{\bar{\psi_{i}}}q_{i}\gamma_{\mu}A^{\mu}\psi_{i}-\frac{1}{2}% \kappa_{i}{\bar{\psi_{i}}}\sigma^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}\psi_{i}-\frac{1}{4}F^{\mu% \nu}F_{\mu\nu}.caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_a italic_g end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - over¯ start_ARG italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (9)

In the above, the parameters k0subscript𝑘0k_{0}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, k2subscript𝑘2k_{2}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and k4subscript𝑘4k_{4}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are fitted to ensure extremum in the vacuum for the equations of motion for scalar fields σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ, ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ and the dilaton field χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ, k1subscript𝑘1k_{1}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is fitted to reproduce the mass of σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ to be of the order of 500 MeV, k3subscript𝑘3k_{3}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is fitted from the η𝜂\etaitalic_η and ηsuperscript𝜂\eta^{\prime}italic_η start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT masses, and the value of the χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ in vacuum is fitted so that the pressure p=0𝑝0p=0italic_p = 0 at the nuclear matter saturation density. In equation (9), qisubscript𝑞𝑖q_{i}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the electric charge of the ithsuperscript𝑖𝑡i^{th}italic_i start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT baryon described by field ψisubscript𝜓𝑖\psi_{i}italic_ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The second term is a tensorial interaction term expressed in terms of the electromagnetic field tensor, Fμνsubscript𝐹𝜇𝜈F_{\mu\nu}italic_F start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (=μAννAμabsentsubscript𝜇subscript𝐴𝜈subscript𝜈subscript𝐴𝜇=\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}= ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT), σμν=i2[γμ,γν]superscript𝜎𝜇𝜈𝑖2superscript𝛾𝜇superscript𝛾𝜈\sigma^{\mu\nu}=\frac{i}{2}[\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}]italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_i end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG [ italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ], and κisubscript𝜅𝑖\kappa_{i}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the anomalous magnetic moment (AMM) of i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon.

The concept of broken scale invariance leading to the trace anomaly in QCD, θμμ=βQCD2gGaμνGμνasuperscriptsubscript𝜃𝜇𝜇subscript𝛽𝑄𝐶𝐷2𝑔subscriptsuperscript𝐺𝑎𝜇𝜈superscript𝐺𝜇𝜈𝑎\theta_{\mu}^{\mu}=\frac{\beta_{QCD}}{2g}{G^{a}}_{\mu\nu}G^{\mu\nu a}italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q italic_C italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_g end_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where Gμνasuperscriptsubscript𝐺𝜇𝜈𝑎G_{\mu\nu}^{a}italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the gluon field strength tensor of QCD, is simulated in the effective Lagrangian at tree level through the introduction of the scale breaking term sche1 ; heide1 given by equation (8). Equating the trace of the energy momentum tensor with that of the present chiral model gives the relation of the dilaton field to the scalar gluon condensate. The explicit symmetry breaking term in the chiral model is given by

SBsubscript𝑆𝐵\displaystyle{\cal L}_{SB}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== (χχ0)2Tr[diag(mπ2fπ2(σ+δ),mπ2fπ2(σδ),(2mK2fK12mπ2fπ)ζ)],superscript𝜒subscript𝜒02Trdelimited-[]diagsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋2𝜎𝛿superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋2𝜎𝛿2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝐾2subscript𝑓𝐾12superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋𝜁\displaystyle-\left(\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}\right)^{2}{\rm Tr}\left[{\rm diag}% \left(\frac{m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}}{2}(\sigma+\delta),\frac{m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}}{2}% (\sigma-\delta),\Big{(}\sqrt{2}m_{K}^{2}f_{K}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}m_{\pi}^{2}f_{% \pi}\Big{)}\zeta\right)\right],- ( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Tr [ roman_diag ( divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_σ + italic_δ ) , divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_σ - italic_δ ) , ( square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_ζ ) ] , (10)

which reduces to eqn. (8), and in QCD, this term is given as SBQCD=Tr[diag(muu¯u,mdd¯d,mss¯s)]superscriptsubscript𝑆𝐵𝑄𝐶𝐷𝑇𝑟delimited-[]diagsubscript𝑚𝑢¯𝑢𝑢subscript𝑚𝑑¯𝑑𝑑subscript𝑚𝑠¯𝑠𝑠{\cal L}_{SB}^{QCD}=-Tr[{\rm diag}(m_{u}\bar{u}u,m_{d}\bar{d}d,m_{s}\bar{s}s)]caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_Q italic_C italic_D end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - italic_T italic_r [ roman_diag ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG italic_u , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG italic_d , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG italic_s ) ]. In the above, the matrices, whose traces give the corresponding Lagrangian densities have been explicitly written down, and a comparison of their matrix elements relates the quark condensates to the values of the scalar fields as given by am_vecqsr

muu¯usubscript𝑚𝑢delimited-⟨⟩¯𝑢𝑢\displaystyle m_{u}\langle\bar{u}u\rangleitalic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG italic_u ⟩ =\displaystyle== (χχ0)2mπ2fπ2(σ+δ),mdd¯d=(χχ0)2mπ2fπ2(σδ),superscript𝜒subscript𝜒02superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋2𝜎𝛿subscript𝑚𝑑delimited-⟨⟩¯𝑑𝑑superscript𝜒subscript𝜒02superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋2𝜎𝛿\displaystyle\Big{(}\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}\Big{)}^{2}\frac{m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}}{% 2}(\sigma+\delta),\;m_{d}\langle\bar{d}d\rangle=\left(\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}% \right)^{2}\frac{m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}}{2}(\sigma-\delta),( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_σ + italic_δ ) , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG italic_d ⟩ = ( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_σ - italic_δ ) ,
mss¯ssubscript𝑚𝑠delimited-⟨⟩¯𝑠𝑠\displaystyle m_{s}\langle\bar{s}s\rangleitalic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG italic_s ⟩ =\displaystyle== (χχ0)2(2mK2fK12mπ2fπ)ζ.superscript𝜒subscript𝜒022superscriptsubscript𝑚𝐾2subscript𝑓𝐾12superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋𝜁\displaystyle\left(\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}\right)^{2}\big{(}\sqrt{2}m_{K}^{2}f_{% K}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}\big{)}\zeta.( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_ζ . (11)

The thermodynamic potential for the magnetized hadronic medium is written as

Ω=ΩDS+Ωmedvec0scalebreakSB.ΩsubscriptΩDSsubscriptΩ𝑚𝑒𝑑subscript𝑣𝑒𝑐subscript0subscript𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑘subscript𝑆𝐵\displaystyle\Omega=\Omega_{\text{DS}}+\Omega_{med}-{\cal L}_{vec}-{\cal L}_{0% }-{\cal L}_{scale\;break}-{\cal L}_{SB}.roman_Ω = roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT DS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v italic_e italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s italic_c italic_a italic_l italic_e italic_b italic_r italic_e italic_a italic_k end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_S italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (12)

In the equation (12), ΩDSsubscriptΩDS\Omega_{\text{DS}}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT DS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and ΩmedsubscriptΩ𝑚𝑒𝑑\Omega_{med}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT denote the contributions of Dirac sea (DS) and Fermi sea (medium part) of the (charged and neutral) baryons to the thermodynamic potential, with the masses and chemical potentials of the baryons, modified due to their interactions with the scalar and vector fields, given by equations (3) and (4) respectively. For spin-1/2 charged baryons (i=p,Σ±,Ξ𝑖𝑝superscriptΣplus-or-minussuperscriptΞi=p,\Sigma^{\pm},\Xi^{-}italic_i = italic_p , roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT), these are given as haber2014 ; Aguirre_Paoli_2016 ; Aguirre2019

ΩDScharged=iΩDSi=i|qiB|2πs=±1ν=0(2δν0)dkz2πϵk,ν,si.superscriptsubscriptΩDS𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑑subscript𝑖superscriptsubscriptΩDS𝑖subscript𝑖subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵2𝜋subscript𝑠plus-or-minus1superscriptsubscript𝜈02subscript𝛿𝜈0superscriptsubscript𝑑subscript𝑘𝑧2𝜋subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠\displaystyle\Omega_{\text{DS}}^{charged}=\sum_{i}\Omega_{\text{DS}}^{i}=-\sum% _{i}\frac{|q_{i}B|}{2\pi}\sum_{s=\pm 1}\sum_{\nu=0}^{\infty}(2-\delta_{\nu 0})% \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dk_{z}}{2\pi}\epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,s}.roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT DS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c italic_h italic_a italic_r italic_g italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT DS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B | end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = ± 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 - italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_d italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (13)

and

ΩmedchargedsuperscriptsubscriptΩ𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑑\displaystyle\Omega_{med}^{charged}roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c italic_h italic_a italic_r italic_g italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =iΩmedi=Ti|qi|B2πs=±1ν=0(2δν0)absentsubscript𝑖superscriptsubscriptΩ𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑇subscript𝑖subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵2𝜋subscript𝑠plus-or-minus1superscriptsubscript𝜈02subscript𝛿𝜈0\displaystyle=\sum_{i}\Omega_{med}^{i}=-T\sum_{i}\frac{|q_{i}|B}{2\pi}\sum_{s=% \pm 1}\sum_{\nu=0}^{\infty}(2-\delta_{\nu 0})= ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - italic_T ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_B end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = ± 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 - italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
dkz2π{ln(1+eβ(ϵk,ν,siμi))+ln(1+eβ(ϵk,ν,si+μi))},superscriptsubscript𝑑subscript𝑘𝑧2𝜋ln1superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖ln1superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖\displaystyle\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dk_{z}}{2\pi}\,\biggl{\{}{\rm ln}% \left(1+e^{-\beta(\epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,s}-\mu^{*}_{i})}\right)+{\rm ln}\left(1+% e^{-\beta(\epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,s}+\mu^{*}_{i})}\right)\biggr{\}},∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_d italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_π end_ARG { roman_ln ( 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + roman_ln ( 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) } , (14)

where, where β=1/T𝛽1𝑇\beta=1/Titalic_β = 1 / italic_T and ϵk,ν,sisubscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠\epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,s}italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the single particle energy of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th charged baryon given as

ϵk,ν,si=kz2+(2ν|qiB|+mi2sκiB)2.subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑧2superscript2𝜈subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖absent2𝑠subscript𝜅𝑖𝐵2\epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,s}=\sqrt{k_{z}^{2}+\left(\sqrt{2\nu|q_{i}B|+m_{i}^{*2}}-s{% \kappa_{i}}B\right)^{2}}.italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( square-root start_ARG 2 italic_ν | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B | + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - italic_s italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (15)

The thermodynamic potentials corresponding to the Dirac sea and the Fermi sea of the neutral baryons (i=n,Λ,Σ0,Ξ0𝑖𝑛ΛsuperscriptΣ0superscriptΞ0i=n,\Lambda,\Sigma^{0},\Xi^{0}italic_i = italic_n , roman_Λ , roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) are given as haber2014 ; Aguirre_Paoli_2016 ; Aguirre2019

ΩDSNeutral=iΩDSi=is=±1d3k(2π)3ϵk,si,superscriptsubscriptΩDS𝑁𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙subscript𝑖superscriptsubscriptΩDS𝑖subscript𝑖subscript𝑠plus-or-minus1superscript𝑑3𝑘superscript2𝜋3subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝑠\displaystyle\Omega_{\text{DS}}^{Neutral}=\sum_{i}\Omega_{\text{DS}}^{i}=-\sum% _{i}\sum_{s=\pm 1}\int\frac{d^{3}k}{\left(2\pi\right)^{3}}\epsilon^{i}_{k,s},roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT DS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N italic_e italic_u italic_t italic_r italic_a italic_l end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT DS end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = ± 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (16)

and,

ΩmedNeutral=iΩmedi=Tis=±1d3k(2π)3{ln(1+eβ(ϵk,siμi))+ln(1+eβ(ϵk,si+μi))},superscriptsubscriptΩ𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑁𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙subscript𝑖superscriptsubscriptΩ𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑇subscript𝑖subscript𝑠plus-or-minus1superscript𝑑3𝑘superscript2𝜋3ln1superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖ln1superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖\Omega_{med}^{Neutral}=\sum_{i}\Omega_{med}^{i}=-T\sum_{i}\sum_{s=\pm 1}\int% \frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}}\biggl{\{}{\rm ln}\left(1+e^{-\beta(\epsilon^{i}_{k,s% }-\mu^{*}_{i})}\right)\\ +{\rm ln}\left(1+e^{-\beta(\epsilon^{i}_{k,s}+\mu^{*}_{i})}\right)\biggr{\}},roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N italic_e italic_u italic_t italic_r italic_a italic_l end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - italic_T ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = ± 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG { roman_ln ( 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + roman_ln ( 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) } , (17)

with the single particle energy for the i𝑖iitalic_i-th neutral baryon given as

ϵk,si=kz2+(kx2+ky2+mi2sκiB)2.subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑧2superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑘𝑥2superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑦2superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖2𝑠subscript𝜅𝑖𝐵2\epsilon^{i}_{k,s}=\sqrt{k_{z}^{2}+\left(\sqrt{k_{x}^{2}+k_{y}^{2}+{m_{i}^{*}}% ^{2}}-s\kappa_{i}B\right)^{2}}.italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( square-root start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - italic_s italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG . (18)

For given values of the baryon density, ρB=iρisubscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝑖subscript𝜌𝑖\rho_{B}=\sum_{i}\rho_{i}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, with ρisubscript𝜌𝑖\rho_{i}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as the number density of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, the isospin asymmetry parameter η=ΣiI3iρiρB𝜂subscriptΣ𝑖subscript𝐼3𝑖subscript𝜌𝑖subscript𝜌𝐵\eta=-\frac{\Sigma_{i}I_{3i}\rho_{i}}{\rho_{B}}italic_η = - divide start_ARG roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG, with I3isubscript𝐼3𝑖I_{3i}italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as the 3rd component of isospin quantum number of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, the strangeness fraction, fs=Σi|si|ρiρBsubscript𝑓𝑠subscriptΣ𝑖subscript𝑠𝑖subscript𝜌𝑖subscript𝜌𝐵f_{s}=\frac{\Sigma_{i}|s_{i}|\rho_{i}}{\rho_{B}}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG, with sisubscript𝑠𝑖s_{i}italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT number of strange quarks in the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, temperature, T𝑇Titalic_T and magnetic field, B𝐵Bitalic_B, the minimisation of the thermodynamic potential leads to the coupled equations for the scalar fields (σ,ζ,δ𝜎𝜁𝛿\sigma,\zeta,\deltaitalic_σ , italic_ζ , italic_δ), the dilaton field χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ, and the vector fields (ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω,ρ𝜌\rhoitalic_ρ, ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ) as given by

k0χ2σ4k1(σ2+ζ2+δ2)σ2k2(σ3+3σδ2)2k3χσζsubscript𝑘0superscript𝜒2𝜎4subscript𝑘1superscript𝜎2superscript𝜁2superscript𝛿2𝜎2subscript𝑘2superscript𝜎33𝜎superscript𝛿22subscript𝑘3𝜒𝜎𝜁\displaystyle k_{0}\chi^{2}\sigma-4k_{1}\left(\sigma^{2}+\zeta^{2}+\delta^{2}% \right)\sigma-2k_{2}\left(\sigma^{3}+3\sigma\delta^{2}\right)-2k_{3}\chi\sigma\zetaitalic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ - 4 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ζ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_σ - 2 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 3 italic_σ italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - 2 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ italic_σ italic_ζ (19)
\displaystyle-- d3χ4(2σσ2δ2)+(χχ0)2mπ2fπgσiρis=0𝑑3superscript𝜒42𝜎superscript𝜎2superscript𝛿2superscript𝜒subscript𝜒02superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋subscript𝑔𝜎𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑖𝑠0\displaystyle\frac{d}{3}\chi^{4}\bigg{(}\frac{2\sigma}{\sigma^{2}-\delta^{2}}% \bigg{)}+\left(\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}\right)^{2}m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}-\sum g_{% \sigma i}\rho_{i}^{s}=0divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG 2 italic_σ end_ARG start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) + ( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∑ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0
k0χ2ζ4k1(σ2+ζ2+δ2)ζ4k2ζ3k3χ(σ2δ2)subscript𝑘0superscript𝜒2𝜁4subscript𝑘1superscript𝜎2superscript𝜁2superscript𝛿2𝜁4subscript𝑘2superscript𝜁3subscript𝑘3𝜒superscript𝜎2superscript𝛿2\displaystyle k_{0}\chi^{2}\zeta-4k_{1}\left(\sigma^{2}+\zeta^{2}+\delta^{2}% \right)\zeta-4k_{2}\zeta^{3}-k_{3}\chi\left(\sigma^{2}-\delta^{2}\right)italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ζ - 4 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ζ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_ζ - 4 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) (20)
\displaystyle-- d3χ4ζ+(χχ0)2[2mK2fK12mπ2fπ]gζiρis=0𝑑3superscript𝜒4𝜁superscript𝜒subscript𝜒02delimited-[]2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝐾2subscript𝑓𝐾12superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋subscript𝑔𝜁𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑖𝑠0\displaystyle\frac{d}{3}\frac{\chi^{4}}{\zeta}+\left(\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}% \right)^{2}\left[\sqrt{2}m_{K}^{2}f_{K}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}% \right]-\sum g_{\zeta i}\rho_{i}^{s}=0divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_ζ end_ARG + ( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] - ∑ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0
k0χ2δ4k1(σ2+ζ2+δ2)δ2k2(δ3+3σ2δ)+k3χδζsubscript𝑘0superscript𝜒2𝛿4subscript𝑘1superscript𝜎2superscript𝜁2superscript𝛿2𝛿2subscript𝑘2superscript𝛿33superscript𝜎2𝛿subscript𝑘3𝜒𝛿𝜁\displaystyle k_{0}\chi^{2}\delta-4k_{1}\left(\sigma^{2}+\zeta^{2}+\delta^{2}% \right)\delta-2k_{2}\left(\delta^{3}+3\sigma^{2}\delta\right)+k_{3}\chi\delta\zetaitalic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ - 4 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ζ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_δ - 2 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 3 italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_δ ) + italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ italic_δ italic_ζ (21)
+\displaystyle++ 23d(δσ2δ2)gδiρis=023𝑑𝛿superscript𝜎2superscript𝛿2subscript𝑔𝛿𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑖𝑠0\displaystyle\frac{2}{3}d\left(\frac{\delta}{\sigma^{2}-\delta^{2}}\right)-% \sum g_{\delta i}\rho_{i}^{s}=0divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_d ( divide start_ARG italic_δ end_ARG start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) - ∑ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0
k0χ(σ2+ζ2+δ2)k3(σ2δ2)ζ+χ3[1+ln(χ4χ04)]+(4k4d)χ3subscript𝑘0𝜒superscript𝜎2superscript𝜁2superscript𝛿2subscript𝑘3superscript𝜎2superscript𝛿2𝜁superscript𝜒3delimited-[]1lnsuperscript𝜒4superscriptsubscript𝜒044subscript𝑘4𝑑superscript𝜒3\displaystyle k_{0}\chi\left(\sigma^{2}+\zeta^{2}+\delta^{2}\right)-k_{3}\left% (\sigma^{2}-\delta^{2}\right)\zeta+\chi^{3}\left[1+{\rm{ln}}\left(\frac{\chi^{% 4}}{\chi_{0}^{4}}\right)\right]+(4k_{4}-d)\chi^{3}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_χ ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ζ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_ζ + italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ 1 + roman_ln ( divide start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) ] + ( 4 italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_d ) italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (22)
\displaystyle-- 43dχ3ln(((σ2δ2)ζσ02ζ0)(χχ0)3)+2χχ02[mπ2fπσ+(2mK2fK12mπ2fπ)ζ]=043𝑑superscript𝜒3lnsuperscript𝜎2superscript𝛿2𝜁superscriptsubscript𝜎02subscript𝜁0superscript𝜒subscript𝜒032𝜒superscriptsubscript𝜒02delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋𝜎2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝐾2subscript𝑓𝐾12superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2subscript𝑓𝜋𝜁0\displaystyle\frac{4}{3}d\chi^{3}{\rm{ln}}\Bigg{(}\bigg{(}\frac{\left(\sigma^{% 2}-\delta^{2}\right)\zeta}{\sigma_{0}^{2}\zeta_{0}}\bigg{)}\bigg{(}\frac{\chi}% {\chi_{0}}\bigg{)}^{3}\Bigg{)}+\frac{2\chi}{\chi_{0}^{2}}\left[m_{\pi}^{2}f_{% \pi}\sigma+\left(\sqrt{2}m_{K}^{2}f_{K}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}m_{\pi}^{2}f_{\pi}% \right)\zeta\right]=0divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_d italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_ln ( ( divide start_ARG ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_ζ end_ARG start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG 2 italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ + ( square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_K end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_ζ ] = 0
(χχ0)2mω2ω+g44(4ω3+12ρ2ω)gωiρi=0,superscript𝜒subscript𝜒02superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜔2𝜔superscriptsubscript𝑔444superscript𝜔312superscript𝜌2𝜔subscript𝑔𝜔𝑖subscript𝜌𝑖0\displaystyle\left(\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}\right)^{2}m_{\omega}^{2}\omega+g_{4}^% {4}\left(4{\omega}^{3}+12{\rho}^{2}{\omega}\right)-\sum g_{\omega i}\rho_{i}=0,( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 12 italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ω ) - ∑ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ω italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , (23)
(χχ0)2mρ2ρ+g44(4ρ3+12ω2ρ)gρiρi=0,superscript𝜒subscript𝜒02superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜌2𝜌superscriptsubscript𝑔444superscript𝜌312superscript𝜔2𝜌subscript𝑔𝜌𝑖subscript𝜌𝑖0\displaystyle\left(\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}\right)^{2}m_{\rho}^{2}\rho+g_{4}^{4}% \left(4{\rho}^{3}+12{\omega}^{2}{\rho}\right)-\sum g_{\rho i}\rho_{i}=0,( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ + italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 4 italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 12 italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ρ ) - ∑ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , (24)
(χχ0)2mϕ2ϕ+8g44ϕ3gϕiρi=0,superscript𝜒subscript𝜒02superscriptsubscript𝑚italic-ϕ2italic-ϕ8superscriptsubscript𝑔44superscriptitalic-ϕ3subscript𝑔italic-ϕ𝑖subscript𝜌𝑖0\displaystyle\left(\frac{\chi}{\chi_{0}}\right)^{2}m_{\phi}^{2}\phi+8g_{4}^{4}% {\phi}^{3}-\sum g_{\phi i}\rho_{i}=0,( divide start_ARG italic_χ end_ARG start_ARG italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ + 8 italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ϕ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ∑ italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ϕ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , (25)

where, ρisubscript𝜌𝑖\rho_{i}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the number density of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, given by the expression

ρi=|qiB|2π2s=±1ν=0(2δν0)0𝑑kz[11+eβ(ϵk,ν,siμi)11+eβ(ϵk,ν,si+μi)],subscript𝜌𝑖subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵2superscript𝜋2subscript𝑠plus-or-minus1superscriptsubscript𝜈02subscript𝛿𝜈0subscriptsuperscript0differential-dsubscript𝑘𝑧delimited-[]11superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖11superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖\displaystyle\rho_{i}=\frac{|q_{i}B|}{2\pi^{2}}\sum_{s=\pm 1}\sum_{\nu=0}^{% \infty}(2-\delta_{\nu 0})\int^{\infty}_{0}dk_{z}\Bigg{[}\frac{1}{1+e^{\beta(% \epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,s}-\mu^{*}_{i})}}-\frac{1}{1+e^{\beta(\epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,% s}+\mu^{*}_{i})}}\Bigg{]},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B | end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = ± 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 - italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ∫ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] , (26)

for charged baryons and

ρi=s=±1d3k(2π)3[11+eβ(ϵk,siμi)11+eβ(ϵk,si+μi)],subscript𝜌𝑖subscript𝑠plus-or-minus1superscript𝑑3𝑘superscript2𝜋3delimited-[]11superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖11superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖\displaystyle\rho_{i}=\sum_{s=\pm 1}\int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}}\Bigg{[}\frac% {1}{1+e^{\beta(\epsilon^{i}_{k,s}-\mu^{*}_{i})}}-\frac{1}{1+e^{\beta(\epsilon^% {i}_{k,s}+\mu^{*}_{i})}}\Bigg{]},italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = ± 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∫ divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] , (27)

for the neutral baryons. In the above equations, the scalar density of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, ρsi=ψ¯iψi=Ω/misuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑖delimited-⟨⟩superscript¯𝜓𝑖superscript𝜓𝑖Ωsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖\rho_{s}^{i}=\langle{\bar{\psi}^{i}}\psi^{i}\rangle={\partial\Omega}/{\partial% {m_{i}^{*}}}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_ψ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ = ∂ roman_Ω / ∂ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The expectation values of the scalar fields (σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ, ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ and δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ) are obtained by solving the equations self-consistently, since these values depend on the baryon scalar densities, ρsisuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑖\rho_{s}^{i}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, which, in turn, are functions of the scalar field (through the effective baryon masses). Neglecting the contribution from the Dirac sea to the thermodynamic potential, the expressions for the scalar density of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, ρsisuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑖\rho_{s}^{i}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is given as

ρsiρsimedsuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑖superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑑\displaystyle\rho_{s}^{i}\equiv{\rho_{s}^{i}}^{med}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≡ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT =|qi|B2π2s=±1ν=0(2δν0)mi0𝑑kzmi2+2ν|qi|BsκiBϵk,ν,simi2+2ν|qi|Babsentsubscript𝑞𝑖𝐵2superscript𝜋2subscript𝑠plus-or-minus1superscriptsubscript𝜈02subscript𝛿𝜈0superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖superscriptsubscript0differential-dsubscript𝑘𝑧superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖22𝜈subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵𝑠subscript𝜅𝑖𝐵subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖22𝜈subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵\displaystyle=\frac{|q_{i}|B}{2\pi^{2}}\sum_{s=\pm 1}\sum_{\nu=0}^{\infty}(2-% \delta_{\nu 0})m_{i}^{*}\int_{0}^{\infty}dk_{z}\frac{\sqrt{{m_{i}^{*}}^{2}+2% \nu|q_{i}|B}-s\kappa_{i}B}{\epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,s}\sqrt{{m_{i}^{*}}^{2}+2\nu|q_% {i}|B}}= divide start_ARG | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_B end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = ± 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 - italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_ν | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_B end_ARG - italic_s italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + 2 italic_ν | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_B end_ARG end_ARG
×[11+eβ(ϵk,ν,siμi)+11+eβ(ϵk,ν,si+μi)],absentdelimited-[]11superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖11superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝜈𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖\displaystyle\times\Bigg{[}\frac{1}{1+e^{\beta(\epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,s}-\mu^{*}_% {i})}}+\frac{1}{1+e^{\beta(\epsilon^{i}_{k,\nu,s}+\mu^{*}_{i})}}\Bigg{]},× [ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_ν , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] , (28)

for the charged baryons and

ρsisuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑖\displaystyle\rho_{s}^{i}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ρsimed=mid3k(2π)3s=±1kx2+ky2+mi2sκiBϵk,sikx2+ky2+mi2[11+eβ(ϵk,siμi)+11+eβ(ϵk,si+μi)],absentsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑑superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖superscript𝑑3𝑘superscript2𝜋3subscript𝑠plus-or-minus1superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑥2superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑦2superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖2𝑠subscript𝜅𝑖𝐵subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝑠superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑥2superscriptsubscript𝑘𝑦2superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖2delimited-[]11superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖11superscript𝑒𝛽subscriptsuperscriptitalic-ϵ𝑖𝑘𝑠subscriptsuperscript𝜇𝑖\displaystyle\equiv{\rho_{s}^{i}}^{med}=m_{i}^{*}\int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}}% \sum_{s=\pm 1}\frac{\sqrt{k_{x}^{2}+k_{y}^{2}+{m_{i}^{*}}^{2}}-s\kappa_{i}B}{% \epsilon^{i}_{k,s}\sqrt{k_{x}^{2}+k_{y}^{2}+{m_{i}^{*}}^{2}}}\Bigg{[}\frac{1}{% 1+e^{\beta(\epsilon^{i}_{k,s}-\mu^{*}_{i})}}+\frac{1}{1+e^{\beta(\epsilon^{i}_% {k,s}+\mu^{*}_{i})}}\Bigg{]},≡ italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m italic_e italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∫ divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k end_ARG start_ARG ( 2 italic_π ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s = ± 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG square-root start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - italic_s italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_ARG start_ARG italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG [ divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 1 + italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_β ( italic_ϵ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k , italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ] , (29)

for the neutral baryons. Within the chiral effective model, the effects of the magnetic field have been studied for isospin asymmetric nuclear matter on the open charm Reddy2018 , open bottom Dhale2018 , charmonium Amal2018 and bottomonium upsilon_mag states, considering the effects of the nucleon AMMs. However, these studies were without incorporating the effects of the nucleon Dirac sea, and, were considering only the contributions from the medium parts of the scalar densities for the charged and neutral baryons given by equations (28) and (29), while solving the values of the scalar fields (σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ, ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ, δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ and χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ), along with the vector fields, from the equations (19)-(25). In the present work of the study the charmed mesons in hot strange hadronic matter in the presence of an external magnetic field, the values of the scalar fields are solved including the contributions to the scalar densities from the Dirac sea of baryons. As may be noted, the expressions corresponding to the contributions to the thermodynamic potential from the Dirac sea for the charged and neutral baryons, given by equations (13) and (16) are divergent and need renormalization. In Ref. haber2014 , the nuclear matter in strong magnetic fields was studied within the Walecka model as well as an extended linear sigma model, ignoring the anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) of the nucleons and the renormalization of the Dirac sea contribution due to the charged baryon, i.e., proton was carried out by using proper time method. Due to its smallness, the pure vacuum (ρBsubscript𝜌𝐵\rho_{B}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0, T=0) contribution corresponding to zero magnetic field was neglected, and the magnetized Dirac sea (the part with non-zero B) was observed to lead to magnetic catalysis. There was no contribution from the neutron due to the Dirac sea, since the AMM of the neutron was not considered. Including the AMMs of the nucleons into account, the covariant fermion propagator in the presence of strong magnetic fields at finite temperature and density has been calculated in Ref. Aguirre_Paoli_2016 , which has been generalized to include the effects of the Dirac sea in Ref. Aguirre2019 . The value of the scalar field, σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ is calculated through the minimisation of the thermodynamic potential haber2014 , from which the effective mass of the nucleon is obtained. There is observed to be increase in the nucleon mass (corresponding to increase in the light quark condensates) with the increase in the magnetic field, when the AMMs of the nucleons are not considered haber2014 , an effect called the magnetic catalysis (MC). On the other hand, the inclusion of the AMMs is observed to lead to the opposite behaviour for the light quark condensates, i.e., the effect of inverse magnetic catalysis (IMC) Arghya2018 . In Ref. Arghya2018 , the baryon propagator in the presence of a magnetic field was calculated accounting for the AMMs of the nucleons within Walecka model, including the effects of the Dirac sea by summing up the scalar (σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ) and vector (ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω) tadpole diagrams in the weak field approximation. In the present study of magnetized hot strange hadronic matter within the chiral effective model, the contribution of the magnetized Dirac sea to the baryon self energy is calculated by summing the scalar (σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ, ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ and δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ) and vector (ω𝜔\omegaitalic_ω, ρ𝜌\rhoitalic_ρ and ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ) tadpole diagrams, arising from the baryon-meson interaction given by equation (2) within the weak field approximation. The propagator for the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, SBi(p)superscriptsubscript𝑆𝐵𝑖𝑝S_{B}^{i}(p)italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_p ) is given by Nieves2004 ; Arghya2018

[γμpμi2qiFμνγμpνmi12κiFμνσμν]SBi(p)=0,delimited-[]superscript𝛾𝜇subscript𝑝𝜇𝑖2subscript𝑞𝑖superscript𝐹𝜇𝜈subscript𝛾𝜇superscript𝑝𝜈superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖12subscript𝜅𝑖superscript𝐹𝜇𝜈subscript𝜎𝜇𝜈superscriptsubscript𝑆𝐵𝑖𝑝0\Bigg{[}\gamma^{\mu}p_{\mu}-\frac{i}{2}q_{i}F^{\mu\nu}\gamma_{\mu}\frac{% \partial}{\partial p^{\nu}}-m_{i}^{*}-\frac{1}{2}\kappa_{i}F^{\mu\nu}\sigma_{% \mu\nu}\Bigg{]}S_{B}^{i}(p)=0,[ italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_i end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT divide start_ARG ∂ end_ARG start_ARG ∂ italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_F start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_p ) = 0 , (30)

where, qisubscript𝑞𝑖q_{i}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and κisubscript𝜅𝑖\kappa_{i}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the electric charge and AMM of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, misuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖m_{i}^{*}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is its effective baryon mass, given by equation (3). The baryon propagator is expanded in powers of qiBsubscript𝑞𝑖𝐵q_{i}Bitalic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B and κiBsubscript𝜅𝑖𝐵\kappa_{i}Bitalic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B, retaining upto quadratic order in the weak field approximation. The divergent expression for the self-energy for pure vacuum (B=0), ΣDS,B=0subscriptΣ𝐷𝑆𝐵0\Sigma_{DS,B=0}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D italic_S , italic_B = 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is neglected due to its smallness haber2014 ; Arghya2018 . The dimensional regularization is used to separate the divergent contribution of the magnetized Dirac sea contribution, ΣDS,BdivsuperscriptsubscriptΣ𝐷𝑆𝐵𝑑𝑖𝑣\Sigma_{DS,B}^{div}roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D italic_S , italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_i italic_v end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, followed by MS¯¯𝑀𝑆{\overline{MS}}over¯ start_ARG italic_M italic_S end_ARG prescription and determination of the scale parameter, ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ, using the condition ΣDS,Bdiv(mi=mi)=0superscriptsubscriptΣ𝐷𝑆𝐵𝑑𝑖𝑣superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑚𝑖0\Sigma_{DS,B}^{div}(m_{i}^{*}=m_{i})=0roman_Σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D italic_S , italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_i italic_v end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = 0. In the present study of magnetized strange hadronic matter at finite temperature, within the chiral effective model, the contribution to the self energy of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon due to the Dirac sea is given as

ΣDS,i=(gσi2mσ2+gζi2mζ2+gδi2mδ2)ρsDS,iAiρsDS,i,superscriptΣ𝐷𝑆𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑔𝜎𝑖2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜎2superscriptsubscript𝑔𝜁𝑖2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜁2superscriptsubscript𝑔𝛿𝑖2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝛿2superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝐷𝑆𝑖subscript𝐴𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝐷𝑆𝑖\Sigma^{DS,i}=-\Big{(}\frac{g_{\sigma i}^{2}}{m_{\sigma}^{2}}+\frac{g_{\zeta i% }^{2}}{m_{\zeta}^{2}}+\frac{g_{\delta i}^{2}}{m_{\delta}^{2}}\Big{)}\rho_{s}^{% DS,i}\equiv-A_{i}\rho_{s}^{DS,i},roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D italic_S , italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - ( divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D italic_S , italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≡ - italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D italic_S , italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (31)

where,

ρsDS,i=14π2[(qiB)23mi+{(κiB)2mi+(|qi|B)(κiB)}(12+2ln(mimi))].superscriptsubscript𝜌𝑠𝐷𝑆𝑖14superscript𝜋2delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑞𝑖𝐵23superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜅𝑖𝐵2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵subscript𝜅𝑖𝐵122lnsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑚𝑖\rho_{s}^{DS,i}=-\frac{1}{4\pi^{2}}\Bigg{[}\frac{(q_{i}B)^{2}}{3m_{i}^{*}}+\{(% \kappa_{i}B)^{2}m_{i}^{*}+(|q_{i}|B)(\kappa_{i}B)\}\Big{(}\frac{1}{2}+2{\rm ln% }\Big{(}\frac{m_{i}^{*}}{m_{i}}\Big{)}\Big{)}\Bigg{]}.italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D italic_S , italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ divide start_ARG ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + { ( italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_B ) ( italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) } ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG + 2 roman_l roman_n ( divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ) ] . (32)

The effects of the Dirac sea of the baryons are taken into consideration by adding the Dirac sea contributions to the scalar densities for the baryons. The contribution from the magnetized Dirac sea to the scalar density of the i𝑖iitalic_i-th baryon, with electric charge, qisubscript𝑞𝑖q_{i}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the anomalous magnetic moment, κisubscript𝜅𝑖\kappa_{i}italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and effective mass, misuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖m_{i}^{*}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, is given by equation (32). As has already been mentioned, the values of scalar fields σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ, ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ, δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ, the dilaton field χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ, along with the vector fields, are obtained by solutions of their coupled equations of motion as given by equations (19)-(25), for given values of the temperature (T𝑇Titalic_T) and magnetic field (B𝐵Bitalic_B), for zero baryon density, as well as, for (strange) hadronic matter for given values of baryon density (ρBsubscript𝜌𝐵\rho_{B}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT), isospin asymmetry parameter (η𝜂\etaitalic_η) and strangeness fraction (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT). These are used to obtain the in-medium masses of the open charm (D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) mesons, the charmonium ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), and the partial decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in magnetized isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter at finite temperatures. The production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) due to the scattering of the charged and neutral DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG pairs are obtained using the in-medium masses and the decay widths in the present work.

III Charm mesons in hot isospin asymmetric magnetized strange hadronic matter

III.1 Masses of open charm and charmonium states

In magnetized isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter at finite temperatures, the medium modifications of the masses of the open charm (D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) mesons arise due to their interactions with the nucleons, hyperons and the scalar mesons (σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ and δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ), whereas, the in-medium mass of the charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) is calculated from the medium change of a dilaton field (which mimics the gluon condensates of QCD) within a chiral effective model amarvepja . The interaction Lagrangian density for D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons is given as amarvepja

𝒟(𝒟¯)subscript𝒟¯𝒟\displaystyle\cal L_{D(\bar{D})}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_D ( over¯ start_ARG caligraphic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =i8fD2[3(p¯γμp+n¯γμn)((D0(μD¯0)(μD0)D¯0)+(D+(μD)(μD+)D))\displaystyle=-\frac{i}{8f_{D}^{2}}\Big{[}3\Big{(}\bar{p}\gamma^{\mu}p+\bar{n}% \gamma^{\mu}n\Big{)}\Big{(}\Big{(}{D^{0}}(\partial_{\mu}\bar{D}^{0})-(\partial% _{\mu}{{D^{0}}}){\bar{D}}^{0}\Big{)}+\Big{(}D^{+}(\partial_{\mu}D^{-})-(% \partial_{\mu}{D^{+}})D^{-}\Big{)}\Big{)}= - divide start_ARG italic_i end_ARG start_ARG 8 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ 3 ( over¯ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p + over¯ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n ) ( ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) )
+(p¯γμpn¯γμn)((D0(μD¯0)(μD0)D¯0)(D+(μD)(μD+)D))¯𝑝superscript𝛾𝜇𝑝¯𝑛superscript𝛾𝜇𝑛superscript𝐷0subscript𝜇superscript¯𝐷0subscript𝜇superscript𝐷0superscript¯𝐷0superscript𝐷subscript𝜇superscript𝐷subscript𝜇superscript𝐷superscript𝐷\displaystyle+\Big{(}\bar{p}\gamma^{\mu}p-\bar{n}\gamma^{\mu}n\Big{)}\Big{(}% \Big{(}{D^{0}}(\partial_{\mu}\bar{D}^{0})-(\partial_{\mu}{{D^{0}}}){\bar{D}}^{% 0}\Big{)}-\Big{(}D^{+}(\partial_{\mu}D^{-})-(\partial_{\mu}{D^{+}})D^{-}\Big{)% }\Big{)}+ ( over¯ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p - over¯ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n ) ( ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) )
+2((Λ¯0γμΛ0)((D0(μD¯0)(μD0)D¯0)+(D+(μD)(μD+)D))\displaystyle+2(\Big{(}\bar{\Lambda}^{0}\gamma^{\mu}\Lambda^{0}\Big{)}\Big{(}% \Big{(}{D^{0}}(\partial_{\mu}\bar{D}^{0})-(\partial_{\mu}{{D^{0}}}){\bar{D}}^{% 0}\Big{)}+\Big{(}D^{+}(\partial_{\mu}D^{-})-(\partial_{\mu}D^{+})D^{-}\Big{)}% \Big{)}+ 2 ( ( over¯ start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) )
+2((Σ¯+γμΣ++Σ¯γμΣ)((D0(μD¯0)(μD0)D¯0)+(D+(μD)(μD+)D))\displaystyle+2\Big{(}\Big{(}\bar{\Sigma}^{+}\gamma^{\mu}\Sigma^{+}+\bar{% \Sigma}^{-}\gamma^{\mu}\Sigma^{-}\Big{)}\Big{(}\Big{(}{D^{0}}(\partial_{\mu}% \bar{D}^{0})-(\partial_{\mu}{{D^{0}}}){\bar{D}}^{0}\Big{)}+\Big{(}D^{+}(% \partial_{\mu}D^{-})-(\partial_{\mu}D^{+})D^{-}\Big{)}\Big{)}+ 2 ( ( over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) )
+(Σ¯+γμΣ+Σ¯γμΣ)((D0(μD¯0)(μD0)D¯0)(D+(μD)(μD+)D)))\displaystyle+\Big{(}\bar{\Sigma}^{+}\gamma^{\mu}\Sigma^{+}-\bar{\Sigma}^{-}% \gamma^{\mu}\Sigma^{-}\Big{)}\Big{(}\Big{(}{D^{0}}(\partial_{\mu}\bar{D}^{0})-% (\partial_{\mu}{{D^{0}}}){\bar{D}}^{0}\Big{)}-\Big{(}D^{+}(\partial_{\mu}D^{-}% )-(\partial_{\mu}D^{+})D^{-}\Big{)}\Big{)}\Big{)}+ ( over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) )
+2(Σ¯0γμΣ0)((D0(μD¯0)(μD0)D¯0)+(D+(μD)(μD+)D))2superscript¯Σ0superscript𝛾𝜇superscriptΣ0superscript𝐷0subscript𝜇superscript¯𝐷0subscript𝜇superscript𝐷0superscript¯𝐷0superscript𝐷subscript𝜇superscript𝐷subscript𝜇superscript𝐷superscript𝐷\displaystyle+2\Big{(}\bar{\Sigma}^{0}\gamma^{\mu}\Sigma^{0}\Big{)}\Big{(}\Big% {(}{D^{0}}(\partial_{\mu}\bar{D}^{0})-(\partial_{\mu}{{D^{0}}}){\bar{D}}^{0}% \Big{)}+\Big{(}D^{+}(\partial_{\mu}D^{-})-(\partial_{\mu}D^{+})D^{-}\Big{)}% \Big{)}+ 2 ( over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) )
+(Ξ¯0γμΞ0+Ξ¯γμΞ)((D0(μD¯0)(μD0)D¯0)+(D+(μD)(μD+)D))superscript¯Ξ0superscript𝛾𝜇superscriptΞ0superscript¯Ξsuperscript𝛾𝜇superscriptΞsuperscript𝐷0subscript𝜇superscript¯𝐷0subscript𝜇superscript𝐷0superscript¯𝐷0superscript𝐷subscript𝜇superscript𝐷subscript𝜇superscript𝐷superscript𝐷\displaystyle+\Big{(}\bar{\Xi}^{0}\gamma^{\mu}\Xi^{0}+\bar{\Xi}^{-}\gamma^{\mu% }\Xi^{-}\Big{)}\Big{(}\Big{(}{D^{0}}(\partial_{\mu}\bar{D}^{0})-(\partial_{\mu% }{{D^{0}}}){\bar{D}}^{0}\Big{)}+\Big{(}D^{+}(\partial_{\mu}D^{-})-(\partial_{% \mu}D^{+})D^{-}\Big{)}\Big{)}+ ( over¯ start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over¯ start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) )
+(Ξ¯0γμΞ0Ξ¯γμΞ)((D0(μD¯0)(μD0)D¯0)(D+(μD)(μD+)D))]\displaystyle+\Big{(}\bar{\Xi}^{0}\gamma^{\mu}\Xi^{0}-\bar{\Xi}^{-}\gamma^{\mu% }\Xi^{-}\Big{)}\Big{(}\Big{(}{D^{0}}(\partial_{\mu}\bar{D}^{0})-(\partial_{\mu% }{{D^{0}}}){\bar{D}}^{0}\Big{)}-\Big{(}D^{+}(\partial_{\mu}D^{-})-(\partial_{% \mu}D^{+})D^{-}\Big{)}\Big{)}\Big{]}+ ( over¯ start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over¯ start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) ]
+mD22fD[(σ+2ζc)(D¯0D0+(DD+))+δ(D¯0D0)(DD+))]\displaystyle+\frac{m_{D}^{2}}{2f_{D}}\Big{[}(\sigma+\sqrt{2}\zeta_{c})\big{(}% \bar{D}^{0}{D^{0}}+(D^{-}D^{+})\big{)}+\delta\big{(}\bar{D}^{0}{D^{0}})-(D^{-}% D^{+})\big{)}\Big{]}+ divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG [ ( italic_σ + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) + italic_δ ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) ]
1fD[(σ+2ζc)((μD¯0)(μD0)+(μD)(μD+))+δ((μD¯0)(μD0)(μD)(μD+))]1subscript𝑓𝐷delimited-[]𝜎2subscript𝜁𝑐subscript𝜇superscript¯𝐷0superscript𝜇superscript𝐷0subscript𝜇superscript𝐷superscript𝜇superscript𝐷𝛿subscript𝜇superscript¯𝐷0superscript𝜇superscript𝐷0subscript𝜇superscript𝐷superscript𝜇superscript𝐷\displaystyle-\frac{1}{f_{D}}\Big{[}(\sigma+\sqrt{2}\zeta_{c})\Big{(}(\partial% _{\mu}{{\bar{D}}^{0}})(\partial^{\mu}{D^{0}})+(\partial_{\mu}{D^{-}})(\partial% ^{\mu}{D^{+}})\Big{)}+\delta\Big{(}(\partial_{\mu}{{\bar{D}}^{0}})(\partial^{% \mu}{D^{0}})-(\partial_{\mu}{D^{-}})(\partial^{\mu}{D^{+}})\Big{)}\Big{]}- divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG [ ( italic_σ + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ( ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) + italic_δ ( ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) - ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) ]
+d12fD2(p¯p+n¯n+Λ¯0Λ0+Σ¯+Σ++Σ¯0Σ0+Σ¯Σ+Ξ¯0Ξ0+Ξ¯Ξ)((μD)(μD+)\displaystyle+\frac{d_{1}}{2f_{D}^{2}}(\bar{p}p+\bar{n}n+\bar{\Lambda}^{0}% \Lambda^{0}+\bar{\Sigma}^{+}\Sigma^{+}+\bar{\Sigma}^{0}\Sigma^{0}+\bar{\Sigma}% ^{-}\Sigma^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{0}\Xi^{0}+\bar{\Xi}^{-}\Xi^{-})\big{(}(\partial_{\mu% }{D^{-}})(\partial^{\mu}{D^{+}})+ divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( over¯ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG italic_p + over¯ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG italic_n + over¯ start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over¯ start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over¯ start_ARG roman_Ξ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
+(μD¯0)(μD0))+d22fD2[(p¯p+16Λ¯0Λ0+Σ¯+Σ++12Σ¯0Σ0)(μD¯0)(μD0)\displaystyle+(\partial_{\mu}{{\bar{D}}^{0}})(\partial^{\mu}{D^{0}})\big{)}+% \frac{d_{2}}{2f_{D}^{2}}\Big{[}\Big{(}\bar{p}p+\frac{1}{6}\bar{\Lambda}^{0}% \Lambda^{0}+\bar{\Sigma}^{+}\Sigma^{+}+\frac{1}{2}\bar{\Sigma}^{0}\Sigma^{0}% \Big{)}(\partial_{\mu}{\bar{D}}^{0})(\partial^{\mu}{D^{0}})+ ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) + divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ ( over¯ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG italic_p + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 6 end_ARG over¯ start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
+(n¯n+16Λ¯0Λ0+Σ¯Σ+12Σ¯0Σ0)(μD)(μD+)],\displaystyle+\Big{(}\bar{n}n+\frac{1}{6}\bar{\Lambda}^{0}\Lambda^{0}+\bar{% \Sigma}^{-}\Sigma^{-}+\frac{1}{2}\bar{\Sigma}^{0}\Sigma^{0}\Big{)}(\partial_{% \mu}D^{-})(\partial^{\mu}D^{+})\Big{]},+ ( over¯ start_ARG italic_n end_ARG italic_n + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 6 end_ARG over¯ start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG over¯ start_ARG roman_Σ end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] , (33)

where, the first term is the vectorial Weinberg Tomozawa interaction term, the second term is the scalar exchange term, which is obtained from the explicit symmetry breaking term, and, the last three terms ((μD¯)(μD)similar-toabsentsubscript𝜇¯𝐷superscript𝜇𝐷\sim(\partial_{\mu}{\bar{D}})(\partial^{\mu}D)∼ ( ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D )) are known as the range terms. The parameters d1subscript𝑑1d_{1}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and d2subscript𝑑2d_{2}italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in the range terms are fitted to the empirical values of kaon-nucleon scattering lengths for I=0𝐼0I=0italic_I = 0 and I=1𝐼1I=1italic_I = 1 isoamss ; isoamss2 . From the interaction Lagrangian density, using the Fourier transformations of equations of motion, the dispersion relations for D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons are obtained as

ω2+k2+mD(D¯)2ΠD(D¯)(ω,|k|)=0,superscript𝜔2superscript𝑘2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝐷¯𝐷2subscriptΠ𝐷¯𝐷𝜔𝑘0-\omega^{2}+\vec{k}^{2}+m_{D(\bar{D})}^{2}-\Pi_{D(\bar{D})}(\omega,|\vec{k}|)=0,- italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω , | over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG | ) = 0 , (34)

where, mD(D¯)subscript𝑚𝐷¯𝐷m_{D(\bar{D})}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the vacuum mass of the D(D¯)𝐷¯𝐷D(\bar{D})italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) meson and ΠD(D¯)(ω,|k|)subscriptΠ𝐷¯𝐷𝜔𝑘\Pi_{D(\bar{D})}(\omega,|\vec{k}|)roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω , | over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG | ) denotes the self-energy of the D(D¯)𝐷¯𝐷D\left(\bar{D}\right)italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) meson. For the D𝐷Ditalic_D meson doublet (D0,D+)superscript𝐷0superscript𝐷\left(D^{0},D^{+}\right)( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), the expression of self energy is given as amarvepja

ΠD(ω,|k|)=14fD2[3(ρp+ρn)±(ρpρn)+2((ρΣ++ρΣ)±(ρΣ+ρΣ))+2(ρΛ0+ρΣ0)\displaystyle\Pi_{D}(\omega,|\vec{k}|)=\frac{1}{4f_{D}^{2}}\Big{[}3(\rho_{p}+% \rho_{n})\pm(\rho_{p}-\rho_{n})+2\Big{(}\left(\rho_{\Sigma^{+}}+\rho_{\Sigma^{% -}}\right)\pm\left(\rho_{\Sigma^{+}}-\rho_{\Sigma^{-}}\right)\Big{)}+2(\rho_{% \Lambda^{0}}+\rho_{\Sigma^{0}})roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω , | over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG | ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ 3 ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 2 ( ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) + 2 ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
+((ρΞ0+ρΞ)±(ρΞ0ρΞ))]ω+mD22fD(σ+2ζc±δ)\displaystyle+(\left(\rho_{\Xi^{0}}+\rho_{\Xi^{-}}\right)\pm\left(\rho_{\Xi^{0% }}-\rho_{\Xi^{-}}\right))\Big{]}\omega+\frac{m_{D}^{2}}{2f_{D}}(\sigma^{\prime% }+\sqrt{2}{\zeta_{c}}^{\prime}\pm\delta^{\prime})+ ( ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) ] italic_ω + divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
+[1fD(σ+2ζc±δ)+d12fD2(ρsp+ρsn+ρsΛ0+ρsΣ++ρsΣ0+ρsΣ+ρsΞ0+ρsΞ)\displaystyle+\Big{[}-\frac{1}{f_{D}}(\sigma^{\prime}+\sqrt{2}{\zeta_{c}}^{% \prime}\pm\delta^{\prime})+\frac{d_{1}}{2f_{D}^{2}}(\rho_{s}^{p}+\rho_{s}^{n}+% \rho_{s}^{\Lambda^{0}}+\rho_{s}^{\Sigma^{+}}+\rho_{s}^{\Sigma^{0}}+\rho_{s}^{% \Sigma^{-}}+\rho_{s}^{\Xi^{0}}+\rho_{s}^{\Xi^{-}})+ [ - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
+d24fD2((ρsp+ρsn)±(ρspρsn)+13ρsΛ0+(ρsΣ++ρsΣ)±(ρsΣ+ρsΣ)+ρsΣ0)](ω2k2).\displaystyle+\frac{d_{2}}{4f_{D}^{2}}\Big{(}({\rho^{s}}_{p}+{\rho^{s}}_{n})% \pm({\rho^{s}}_{p}-{\rho^{s}}_{n})+\frac{1}{3}{\rho^{s}}_{\Lambda}^{0}+({\rho^% {s}}_{\Sigma}^{+}+{\rho^{s}}_{\Sigma}^{-})\pm({\rho^{s}}_{\Sigma}^{+}-{\rho^{s% }}_{\Sigma}^{-})+{\rho^{s}}_{\Sigma}^{0}\Big{)}\Big{]}(\omega^{2}-{\vec{k}}^{2% }).+ divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] ( italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . (35)

The ±plus-or-minus\pm± signs in the above equation refer to the D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mesons, respectively. Also, σ(=σσ0)annotatedsuperscript𝜎absent𝜎subscript𝜎0\sigma^{\prime}\left(=\sigma-\sigma_{0}\right)italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( = italic_σ - italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), ζc(=ζcζc0)annotatedsuperscriptsubscript𝜁𝑐absentsubscript𝜁𝑐subscript𝜁𝑐0\zeta_{c}^{\prime}\left(=\zeta_{c}-\zeta_{c0}\right)italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( = italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), and δ(=δδ0)annotatedsuperscript𝛿absent𝛿subscript𝛿0\delta^{\prime}\left(=\delta-\delta_{0}\right)italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( = italic_δ - italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) are the fluctuations of the scalar-isoscalar fields σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ, ζcsubscript𝜁𝑐\zeta_{c}italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the scalar-isovector field δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ from their vacuum expectation values in the strange hyperonic medium. The vacuum expectation value of δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ is zero (δ0=0)subscript𝛿00\left(\delta_{0}=0\right)( italic_δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 ), since a nonzero value for it will break the isospin-symmetry of the vacuum. Since ζcsubscript𝜁𝑐\zeta_{c}italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is made of heavy charm quark-antiquark pair, its medium modification is not considered in the present work, i.e, ζc=0superscriptsubscript𝜁𝑐0\zeta_{c}^{\prime}=0italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0 is assumed amarindam ; amarvepja . For the D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG meson doublet (D¯0,D)superscript¯𝐷0superscript𝐷\left(\bar{D}^{0},D^{-}\right)( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), the self-energy is given as

ΠD¯(ω,|k|)=14fD2[3(ρp+ρn)±(ρpρn)+2((ρΣ++ρΣ)±(ρΣ+ρΣ))+2(ρΛ0+ρΣ0)\displaystyle\Pi_{\bar{D}}(\omega,|\vec{k}|)=-\frac{1}{4f_{D}^{2}}\Big{[}3(% \rho_{p}+\rho_{n})\pm(\rho_{p}-\rho_{n})+2\Big{(}\left(\rho_{\Sigma^{+}}+\rho_% {\Sigma^{-}}\right)\pm\left(\rho_{\Sigma^{+}}-\rho_{\Sigma^{-}}\right)\Big{)}+% 2(\rho_{\Lambda^{0}}+\rho_{\Sigma^{0}})roman_Π start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ω , | over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG | ) = - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG [ 3 ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + 2 ( ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) + 2 ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT )
+((ρΞ0+ρΞ)±(ρΞ0ρΞ))]ω+mD22fD(σ+2ζc±δ)\displaystyle+(\left(\rho_{\Xi^{0}}+\rho_{\Xi^{-}}\right)\pm\left(\rho_{\Xi^{0% }}-\rho_{\Xi^{-}}\right))\Big{]}\omega+\frac{m_{D}^{2}}{2f_{D}}(\sigma^{\prime% }+\sqrt{2}{\zeta_{c}}^{\prime}\pm\delta^{\prime})+ ( ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ) ] italic_ω + divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
+[1fD(σ+2ζc±δ)+d12fD2(ρsp+ρsn+ρsΛ0+ρsΣ++ρsΣ0+ρsΣ+ρsΞ0+ρsΞ)\displaystyle+\Big{[}-\frac{1}{f_{D}}(\sigma^{\prime}+\sqrt{2}{\zeta_{c}}^{% \prime}\pm\delta^{\prime})+\frac{d_{1}}{2f_{D}^{2}}(\rho_{s}^{p}+\rho_{s}^{n}+% \rho_{s}^{\Lambda^{0}}+\rho_{s}^{\Sigma^{+}}+\rho_{s}^{\Sigma^{0}}+\rho_{s}^{% \Sigma^{-}}+\rho_{s}^{\Xi^{0}}+\rho_{s}^{\Xi^{-}})+ [ - divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + square-root start_ARG 2 end_ARG italic_ζ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± italic_δ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Λ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Σ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )
+d24fD2((ρsp+ρsn)±(ρspρsn)+13ρsΛ0+(ρsΣ++ρsΣ)±(ρsΣ+ρsΣ)+ρsΣ0)](ω2k2),\displaystyle+\frac{d_{2}}{4f_{D}^{2}}\Big{(}({\rho^{s}}_{p}+{\rho^{s}}_{n})% \pm({\rho^{s}}_{p}-{\rho^{s}}_{n})+\frac{1}{3}{\rho^{s}}_{\Lambda}^{0}+({\rho^% {s}}_{\Sigma}^{+}+{\rho^{s}}_{\Sigma}^{-})\pm({\rho^{s}}_{\Sigma}^{+}-{\rho^{s% }}_{\Sigma}^{-})+{\rho^{s}}_{\Sigma}^{0}\Big{)}\Big{]}(\omega^{2}-{\vec{k}}^{2% }),+ divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_p end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) + divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Λ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ± ( italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) + italic_ρ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Σ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ] ( italic_ω start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) , (36)

where the ±plus-or-minus\pm± sign refers to the D¯0(D)superscript¯𝐷0superscript𝐷\bar{D}^{0}(D^{-})over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) meson.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The scalar fields σ,ζ𝜎𝜁\sigma,\zetaitalic_σ , italic_ζ and δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ are plotted as functions of magnetic field eB/mπ2𝑒𝐵superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB/m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (for symmetric (η=0𝜂0\eta=0italic_η = 0) nuclear (fs=0subscript𝑓𝑠0f_{s}=0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0) and hyperonic matter (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3)) for different temperatures, considering baryonic Dirac sea (DS) contributions. These are also plotted when the DS contributions are ignored (the closely and widely spaced dotted lines for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Same as figure 1, for asymmetric matter (η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3).
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The masses of pseudoscalar D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mesons are plotted as functions of magnetic field eB/mπ2𝑒𝐵superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB/m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and for asymmetric nuclear matter (ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3 and fs=0subscript𝑓𝑠0f_{s}=0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0), considering baryonic Dirac sea contributions, with and without PV mixing. These are also plotted when Dirac sea contributions are neglected (the closely and widely spaced dotted lines for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Same as figure 3, for hyperonic matter (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3).
Refer to caption
Figure 5: The masses of pseudoscalar Dsuperscript𝐷D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0¯¯superscript𝐷0\bar{D^{0}}over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons are plotted as functions of magnetic field eB/mπ2𝑒𝐵superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB/m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and for asymmetric nuclear matter (ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3 and fs=0subscript𝑓𝑠0f_{s}=0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0), considering baryonic Dirac sea contributions, with and without PV mixing. These are also plotted when Dirac sea contributions are neglected (the closely and widely spaced dotted lines for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Same as figure 5, for hyperonic matter (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3).
Refer to caption
Figure 7: The mass of charmonium ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) is plotted as a function of magnetic field eB/mπ2𝑒𝐵superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB/m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and for asymmetric (η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3) nuclear (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0) and strange hadronic (with fs=0.3subscript𝑓𝑠0.3f_{s}=0.3italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3) matter, for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, with and without PV mixing, considering baryonic Dirac sea contributions. The masses are also plotted when Dirac sea contributions are neglected (the closely and widely spaced dotted lines for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Decay widths of charmonium ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) to (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, (II) D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG and (III) total DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG, i.e., (I+II) are plotted as functions of magnetic field eB/mπ2𝑒𝐵superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB/m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and for asymmetric (η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3) nuclear matter (fs=0subscript𝑓𝑠0f_{s}=0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0) and strange hadronic matter (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3), for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, using the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model, considering baryonic Dirac sea contributions and PV mixing. These are also plotted when Dirac sea contributions are neglected (the closely and widely spaced dotted lines for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Same as Fig. 8, using the field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: Production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) due to scattering of (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (II) D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons are plotted at different temperatures, as functions of the invariant mass, for eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 as well as for asymmetric (η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) nuclear (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0) matter at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, with the decay widths obtained using the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model. These are also plotted when Dirac sea contributions are neglected (the closely and widely spaced dotted lines for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT).
Refer to caption
Figure 11: Same as Fig. 10, for strange hadronic matter (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3).
Refer to caption
Figure 12: Same as Fig. 10, with decay widths calculated using the field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons.
Refer to caption
Figure 13: Same as Fig. 11, with decay widths calculated using the field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons.

The in-medium mass mD(D¯)superscriptsubscript𝑚𝐷¯𝐷m_{D(\bar{D})}^{*}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for D(D¯)𝐷¯𝐷D(\bar{D})italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) meson is obtained by solving the dispersion relation given by equation (34) for momentum |k|=0𝑘0|\vec{k}|=0| over→ start_ARG italic_k end_ARG | = 0. The medium modifications of the masses of these open charm mesons arise due to their interactions with the scalar mesons and baryons (through their number and scalar densities). It may be noted here that there is no contribution due to interaction with the pions, since the expectation values of these odd-parity fields are zero in the mean field approximation. For the charged D𝐷Ditalic_D (D±superscript𝐷plus-or-minusD^{\pm}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) mesons, additional contributions from the lowest Landau levels (LLL) are taken into account, and the effective mass of these mesons are given as mD±eff=mD±2+|eB|subscriptsuperscript𝑚𝑒𝑓𝑓superscript𝐷plus-or-minussuperscriptsubscript𝑚superscript𝐷plus-or-minusabsent2𝑒𝐵m^{eff}_{D^{\pm}}=\sqrt{m_{D^{\pm}}^{*2}+|eB|}italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e italic_f italic_f end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = square-root start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | italic_e italic_B | end_ARG open_charm_mag_AM_SPM .

The effective mass of charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) is obtained from the medium modification of the dilaton field, χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ, which simulates the gluon condensates of QCD within the chiral effective model. The mass shift of the charmonium states arises from the medium modification of the scalar gluon condensate in the leading order and is given as pes1 ; pes2 ; voloshin ; leeko

ΔmΨΔsubscript𝑚Ψ\displaystyle\Delta m_{\Psi}roman_Δ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT =\displaystyle== 118d|𝐤|2|ψ(𝐤)𝐤|2|𝐤||𝐤|2/mc+ϵ(αsπGμνaGμνaαsπGμνaGμνa0),118𝑑superscript𝐤2delimited-⟨⟩superscript𝜓𝐤𝐤2𝐤superscript𝐤2subscript𝑚𝑐italic-ϵdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝛼𝑠𝜋superscriptsubscript𝐺𝜇𝜈𝑎superscript𝐺𝜇𝜈𝑎subscriptdelimited-⟨⟩subscript𝛼𝑠𝜋superscriptsubscript𝐺𝜇𝜈𝑎superscript𝐺𝜇𝜈𝑎0\displaystyle\frac{1}{18}\int d{|{\bf k}|}^{2}\left\langle\left|\frac{\partial% \psi({\bf k})}{\partial{\bf k}}\right|^{2}\right\rangle\frac{|{\bf k}|}{|{\bf k% }|^{2}/m_{c}+\epsilon}\bigg{(}\left\langle\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}G_{\mu\nu}^{a}% G^{\mu\nu a}\right\rangle-\left\langle\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}G_{\mu\nu}^{a}G^{% \mu\nu a}\right\rangle_{0}\bigg{)},divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 18 end_ARG ∫ italic_d | bold_k | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ | divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ψ ( bold_k ) end_ARG start_ARG ∂ bold_k end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ divide start_ARG | bold_k | end_ARG start_ARG | bold_k | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ϵ end_ARG ( ⟨ divide start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_π end_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ - ⟨ divide start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_π end_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , (37)

where

|ψ(𝐤)𝐤|2=14π|ψ(𝐤)𝐤|2𝑑Ω.delimited-⟨⟩superscript𝜓𝐤𝐤214𝜋superscript𝜓𝐤𝐤2differential-dΩ\left\langle\left|\frac{\partial\psi(\bf k)}{\partial{\bf k}}\right|^{2}\right% \rangle=\frac{1}{4\pi}\int\left|\frac{\partial\psi(\bf k)}{\partial{\bf k}}% \right|^{2}d\Omega.⟨ | divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ψ ( bold_k ) end_ARG start_ARG ∂ bold_k end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_π end_ARG ∫ | divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ψ ( bold_k ) end_ARG start_ARG ∂ bold_k end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d roman_Ω . (38)

Equating the trace of the energy momentum tensor of the chiral model and QCD relates the scalar gluon condensates to the dilaton field, χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ as amarvepja

αsπGμνaGμνa=24(332Nf)(1d)χ4,delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝛼𝑠𝜋superscriptsubscript𝐺𝜇𝜈𝑎superscript𝐺𝜇𝜈𝑎24332subscript𝑁𝑓1𝑑superscript𝜒4\left\langle\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}G_{\mu\nu}^{a}G^{\mu\nu a}\right\rangle=% \frac{24}{(33-2N_{f})}(1-d)\chi^{4},⟨ divide start_ARG italic_α start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_π end_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_G start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν italic_a end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ = divide start_ARG 24 end_ARG start_ARG ( 33 - 2 italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_f end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) end_ARG ( 1 - italic_d ) italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (39)

in the limiting situation of massless quarks in the energy momentum tensor of QCD.

Using equations (37) and (39), one obtains the mass shift of the charmonium state as amarvdmesonTprc ; amarvepja

ΔmΨ=481(1d)d|𝐤|2|ψ(𝐤)𝐤|2|𝐤||𝐤|2/mc+ϵ(χ4χ04).Δsubscript𝑚Ψ4811𝑑𝑑superscript𝐤2delimited-⟨⟩superscript𝜓𝐤𝐤2𝐤superscript𝐤2subscript𝑚𝑐italic-ϵsuperscript𝜒4superscriptsubscript𝜒04\Delta m_{\Psi}=\frac{4}{81}(1-d)\int d|{\bf k}|^{2}\left\langle\left|\frac{% \partial\psi(\bf k)}{\partial{\bf k}}\right|^{2}\right\rangle\frac{|{\bf k}|}{% |{\bf k}|^{2}/m_{c}+\epsilon}\left(\chi^{4}-{\chi_{0}}^{4}\right).roman_Δ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 81 end_ARG ( 1 - italic_d ) ∫ italic_d | bold_k | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟨ | divide start_ARG ∂ italic_ψ ( bold_k ) end_ARG start_ARG ∂ bold_k end_ARG | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ divide start_ARG | bold_k | end_ARG start_ARG | bold_k | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_ϵ end_ARG ( italic_χ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) . (40)

In equation (40), d𝑑ditalic_d is a parameter introduced in the scale breaking term in the Lagrangian, χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ and χ0subscript𝜒0\chi_{0}italic_χ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the values of the dilaton field in the magnetized medium and in vacuum respectively. The wave functions of the charmonium states, ψ(𝐤)𝜓𝐤\psi(\bf k)italic_ψ ( bold_k ) are assumed to be harmonic oscillator wave functions, mcsubscript𝑚𝑐m_{c}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the mass of the charm quark, ϵ=2mcmψitalic-ϵ2subscript𝑚𝑐subscript𝑚𝜓\epsilon=2m_{c}-m_{\psi}italic_ϵ = 2 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the binding energy of the charmonium state of mass, mψsubscript𝑚𝜓m_{\psi}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Pseudoscalar-Vector meson (PV) mixing:
In the presence of a magnetic field, there is mixing between the spin 0 (pseudoscalar) meson and spin 1 (vector) mesons, which modifies the masses of these mesons charmonium_mag_QSR ; charmonium_mag_lee ; Suzuki_Lee_2017 ; Alford_Strickland_2013 ; charmdw_mag ; open_charm_mag_AM_SPM ; strange_AM_SPM ; Quarkonia_B_Iwasaki_Oka_Suzuki . The mass modifications have been studied using a phenomenological Lagrangian density of the form charmonium_mag_lee ; Suzuki_Lee_2017 ; Quarkonia_B_Iwasaki_Oka_Suzuki

PVγ=gPVmaveF~μν(μP)Vν,subscript𝑃𝑉𝛾subscript𝑔𝑃𝑉subscript𝑚𝑎𝑣𝑒subscript~𝐹𝜇𝜈superscript𝜇𝑃superscript𝑉𝜈{\cal L}_{PV\gamma}=\frac{g_{PV}}{m_{av}}e{\tilde{F}}_{\mu\nu}(\partial^{\mu}P% )V^{\nu},caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P italic_V italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_e over~ start_ARG italic_F end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( ∂ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_μ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P ) italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_ν end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (41)

for the heavy quarkonia charmonium_mag_QSR ; charmonium_mag_lee ; Suzuki_Lee_2017 ; charmdw_mag ; upslndw_mag , the open charm mesons open_charm_mag_AM_SPM and the strange (K𝐾Kitalic_K and K¯¯𝐾\bar{K}over¯ start_ARG italic_K end_ARG) mesons strange_AM_SPM . In equation (41), mav=(mV+mP)/2subscript𝑚𝑎𝑣subscript𝑚𝑉subscript𝑚𝑃2m_{av}=(m_{V}+m_{P})/2italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) / 2, mPsubscript𝑚𝑃m_{P}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and mVsubscript𝑚𝑉m_{V}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the masses for the pseudoscalar and vector charmonium states, F~μνsubscript~𝐹𝜇𝜈{\tilde{F}}_{\mu\nu}over~ start_ARG italic_F end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_μ italic_ν end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the dual electromagnetic field. The coupling parameter gPVsubscript𝑔𝑃𝑉g_{PV}italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is fitted from the observed value of the radiative decay width, Γ(VP+γ)Γ𝑉𝑃𝛾\Gamma(V\rightarrow P+\gamma)roman_Γ ( italic_V → italic_P + italic_γ ). Assuming the spatial momenta of the heavy quarkonia to be zero, there is observed to be mixing between the pseudoscalar and the longitudinal component of the vector field from their equations of motion obtained with the phenomenological PVγ𝑃𝑉𝛾PV\gammaitalic_P italic_V italic_γ interaction given by equation (41). The physical masses of the pseudoscalar and the longitudinal component of the vector mesons including the mixing effects, obtained by solving their equations of motion, are given as charmonium_mag_lee ; Suzuki_Lee_2017 ; Quarkonia_B_Iwasaki_Oka_Suzuki

mP(V||)(PV)=12(M+2+cPV2mav2M4+2cPV2M+2mav2+cPV4mav4),m^{(PV)}_{P(V^{||})}=\frac{1}{2}\Bigg{(}M_{+}^{2}+\frac{c_{PV}^{2}}{m_{av}^{2}% }\mp\sqrt{M_{-}^{4}+\frac{2c_{PV}^{2}M_{+}^{2}}{m_{av}^{2}}+\frac{c_{PV}^{4}}{% m_{av}^{4}}}\Bigg{)},italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_P italic_V ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P ( italic_V start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | | end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ( italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ∓ square-root start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + divide start_ARG 2 italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + divide start_ARG italic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a italic_v end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG end_ARG ) , (42)

where M+2=mP2+mV2superscriptsubscript𝑀2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑃2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑉2M_{+}^{2}=m_{P}^{2}+m_{V}^{2}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT + end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, M2=mV2mP2superscriptsubscript𝑀2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑉2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑃2M_{-}^{2}=m_{V}^{2}-m_{P}^{2}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and cPV=gPVeBsubscript𝑐𝑃𝑉subscript𝑔𝑃𝑉𝑒𝐵c_{PV}=g_{PV}eBitalic_c start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_B. In the above equation, the ‘minus-or-plus\mp’ corresponds to the mass of the pseudoscalar (longitudinal component of the vector) meson. The effective Lagrangian term given by equation (41) has been observed to lead to the mass modifications of the longitudinal J/ψ𝐽𝜓J/\psiitalic_J / italic_ψ and ηcsubscript𝜂𝑐\eta_{c}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT due to the presence of the magnetic field, which agree extermely well with a study of these charmonium states using a QCD sum rule approach incorporating the mixing effects charmonium_mag_QSR ; charmonium_mag_lee .

The PV mixing effects for the open charm mesons (due to DD𝐷superscript𝐷D-D^{*}italic_D - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D¯D¯¯𝐷superscript¯𝐷\bar{D}-\bar{D}^{*}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG - over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mixings) open_charm_mag_AM_SPM , in addition to the mixing of the charmonium states (due to J/ψηc𝐽𝜓subscript𝜂𝑐J/\psi-\eta_{c}italic_J / italic_ψ - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, ψηcsuperscript𝜓superscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\psi^{\prime}-\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ψ(3770)ηc𝜓3770superscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\psi(3770)-\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mixings) charmdw_mag ; open_charm_mag_AM_SPM , as calculated using the phenomenological Lagrangian given by equation (41) have been observed to lead to appreciable drop (rise) in the mass of the pseudoscalar (longitudinal component of the vector) meson. These were observed to modify the partial decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG charmdw_mag ; open_charm_mag_AM_SPM , with the modifications being much more dominant due to the PV mixing in the open charm (DD𝐷superscript𝐷D-{D^{*}}italic_D - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D¯D¯¯𝐷superscript¯𝐷{\bar{D}}-{\bar{D}}^{*}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG - over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) mesons.

III.2 Partial Decay width of Charmonium state to DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG

In this subsection, we briefly describe the study of partial decay width of charmonium state, ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) to open charm (D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) mesons, in hot asymmetric strange hadronic matter in the prsence of a magnetic field. These are studied using (I) the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model, and, (II) a field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons with quark (and antiquark) constituents. In both of these models, the decay proceeds with creation of a light quark-antiquark pair and the heavy charm quark (antiquark) of the parent charmonium state combining with the light antiquark (quark) to produce the DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in the final state.

For the charmonium state decaying at rest, the in-medium decay widths are obtained in terms of the magntitude of the 3-momentum of the outgoing D𝐷Ditalic_D (D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) given as

|𝐩|=(Mψ24mD2+mD¯22+(mD2mD¯2)24Mψ2)1/2,𝐩superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑀𝜓24superscriptsubscript𝑚𝐷2superscriptsubscript𝑚¯𝐷22superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝐷2superscriptsubscript𝑚¯𝐷224superscriptsubscript𝑀𝜓212|{\bf p}|=\Bigg{(}\frac{{M_{\psi}}^{2}}{4}-\frac{{m_{D}}^{2}+{m_{\bar{D}}}^{2}% }{2}+\frac{({m_{D}}^{2}-{m_{\bar{D}}}^{2})^{2}}{4{M_{\psi}}^{2}}\Bigg{)}^{1/2},| bold_p | = ( divide start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG - divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG + divide start_ARG ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 4 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (43)

where, Mψsubscript𝑀𝜓M_{\psi}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, mDsubscript𝑚𝐷m_{D}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and mD¯subscript𝑚¯𝐷m_{\bar{D}}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the in-medium masses of the charmonium state, ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons. The mass modifications of the charmonium states and the open charm mesons are observed to lead to substantial modification of the partial decay width of ψ(1D)DD¯𝜓1𝐷𝐷¯𝐷\psi(1D)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 1 italic_D ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG charmdw_mag due to ψ(1D)ηc(2S)𝜓1𝐷subscript𝜂𝑐2𝑆\psi(1D)-\eta_{c}(2S)italic_ψ ( 1 italic_D ) - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_S ) mixing, as well as, due to D(D¯)D(D¯)𝐷¯𝐷superscript𝐷superscript¯𝐷D(\bar{D})-D^{*}(\bar{D}^{*})italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) mixing effects open_charm_mag_AM_SPM ; HQ_DW_DS_AM_SPM_2023 . The medium modified masses of D𝐷Ditalic_D, D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons and the charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) in magnetized isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter at finite temperatures, and, their effect on the decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG are calculated in the present investigation. The masses of the charmonium and open charm mesons are computed including the effects of the Dirac sea as well as PV mixing, with additional contributions from the lowest Landau level (LLL) for the charged D±superscript𝐷plus-or-minusD^{\pm}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mesons, as has been described in the previous subsections.

The P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model friman ; micu ; yaouanc ; barnesclose describes the charmonium decaying to DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG with creation of a light quark-antiquark pair in the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT state, where the light quark and antiquark combine with the heavy charm antiquark and quark of the parent meson, to produce the D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons in the final state. The wave functions of the charmonium state and the open charm mesons are assumed to be of harmonic oscillator type. The decay width of the charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), corresponding to the 1D1𝐷1D1 italic_D state, decaying at rest to DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG is given as barnesclose ; friman

Γ[3P0](ψ(3770)(𝟎)D(𝐩)D¯(𝐩))=π1/2ED(|𝐩|)ED¯(|𝐩|)γ22Mψ211532(r1+2r2)7\displaystyle\Gamma^{[^{3}P_{0}]}(\psi(3770)({\bf 0})\rightarrow D({\bf p})% \bar{D}(-{\bf p}))=\pi^{1/2}\frac{E_{D}(|{\bf p}|)E_{\bar{D}}(|{\bf p}|)\gamma% ^{2}}{2M_{\psi}}\frac{2^{11}5}{3^{2}}\Big{(}\frac{r}{1+2r^{2}}\Big{)}^{7}roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ψ ( 3770 ) ( bold_0 ) → italic_D ( bold_p ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ( - bold_p ) ) = italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG 2 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 11 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 5 end_ARG start_ARG 3 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ( divide start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_ARG 1 + 2 italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 7 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (44)
×\displaystyle\times× x3(11+r25(1+2r2)x2)2exp(x22(1+2r2)),superscript𝑥3superscript11superscript𝑟2512superscript𝑟2superscript𝑥22superscript𝑥2212superscript𝑟2\displaystyle x^{3}\Bigg{(}1-\frac{1+r^{2}}{5(1+2r^{2})}x^{2}\Bigg{)}^{2}\exp% \Big{(}-\frac{x^{2}}{2(1+2r^{2})}\Big{)},italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 1 - divide start_ARG 1 + italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 5 ( 1 + 2 italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_exp ( - divide start_ARG italic_x start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 ( 1 + 2 italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_ARG ) ,

where, x=|𝐩|/βD𝑥𝐩subscript𝛽𝐷x=|{\bf p}|/\beta_{D}italic_x = | bold_p | / italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, r=ββD𝑟𝛽subscript𝛽𝐷r=\frac{\beta}{\beta_{D}}italic_r = divide start_ARG italic_β end_ARG start_ARG italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG is the ratio of the harmonic oscillator strengths of the decaying charmonium state and the produced D(D¯)𝐷¯𝐷D(\bar{D})italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG )-mesons, ED(|𝐩|)subscript𝐸𝐷𝐩E_{D}(|{\bf p}|)italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) and ED¯(|𝐩|)subscript𝐸¯𝐷𝐩E_{\bar{D}}(|{\bf p}|)italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) is the energy of the outgoing D𝐷Ditalic_D (D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) meson given as ED(D¯)(|𝐩|)=(|𝐩|2+mD(D¯)2)1/2subscript𝐸𝐷¯𝐷𝐩superscriptsuperscript𝐩2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝐷¯𝐷212E_{D(\bar{D})}(|{\bf p}|)=(|{\bf p}|^{2}+{m_{D(\bar{D})}}^{2})^{1/2}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) = ( | bold_p | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and, γ𝛾\gammaitalic_γ is a measure of the strength of the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT vertex friman ; barnesclose fitted from the observed decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG amarvepja .

We next briefly descibe the field theoretical model of composite hadrons spm781 ; spm782 used to compute the partial decay widths of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in magnetized hot isospin asymmetric hyperonic matter. The model describes the hadrons as comprising of quark (and antiquark) constituents. The constituent quark field operators of the hadron in motion are constructed from the constituent quark field operators of the hadron at rest, by a Lorentz boosting. Similar to the MIT bag model MIT_bag , where the quarks (antiquarks) occupy specific energy levels inside the hadron, it is assumed in the present model for the composite hadrons that the quark (antiquark) constituents carry fractions of the mass (energy) of the hadron at rest (in motion) spm781 ; spm782 . With explicit constructions of the charmonium state and the open charm (D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) mesons, the charmonium decay width is calculated using the light quark antiquark pair creation term of the free Dirac Hamiltonian given as

qq~(𝐱,t=0)=Qq(p)(𝐱)(iα+βMq)Q~q(p)(𝐱)subscriptsuperscript𝑞~𝑞𝐱𝑡0superscriptsubscript𝑄𝑞𝑝superscript𝐱𝑖𝛼𝛽subscript𝑀𝑞superscriptsubscript~𝑄𝑞superscript𝑝𝐱{\cal H}_{q^{\dagger}\tilde{q}}({\bf x},t=0)=Q_{q}^{(p)}({\bf x})^{\dagger}(-i% {\vec{\alpha}\cdot{\vec{\bigtriangledown}}}+\beta M_{q}){\tilde{Q}}_{q}^{(p^{% \prime})}({\bf x})caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over~ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_x , italic_t = 0 ) = italic_Q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_p ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_x ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( - italic_i over→ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG ⋅ over→ start_ARG ▽ end_ARG + italic_β italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) over~ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( bold_x ) (45)

where, α=(0σσ0)𝛼0𝜎𝜎0\vec{\alpha}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&\vec{\sigma}\\ \vec{\sigma}&0\end{array}\right)over→ start_ARG italic_α end_ARG = ( start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL over→ start_ARG italic_σ end_ARG end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL over→ start_ARG italic_σ end_ARG end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY ) and β=(I00I)𝛽𝐼00𝐼\beta=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}I&0\\ 0&-I\end{array}\right)italic_β = ( start_ARRAY start_ROW start_CELL italic_I end_CELL start_CELL 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL 0 end_CELL start_CELL - italic_I end_CELL end_ROW end_ARRAY ) are the Dirac matrices, Mqsubscript𝑀𝑞M_{q}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the constituent mass of the light quark (antiquark). The subscript q𝑞qitalic_q of the field operators in equation (45) refers to the fact that the light antiquark, q¯¯𝑞\bar{q}over¯ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG and light quark, q𝑞qitalic_q are the constituents of the D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons with momenta 𝐩𝐩{\bf p}bold_p and 𝐩superscript𝐩{\bf p^{\prime}}bold_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT respectively in the final state of the decay of the charmonium state, Ψ(3770)Ψ3770\Psi(3770)roman_Ψ ( 3770 ). The decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG is calculated from the matrix element of the light quark-antiquark pair creation part of the free Dirac Hamiltonian, between the initial and the final state mesons as given by

D(𝐩)|D¯(𝐩)|qq~(𝐱,t=0)𝑑𝐱|ψ(3770)m(0)=δ(𝐩+𝐩)Aψ(|𝐩|)pm,bra𝐷𝐩quantum-operator-product¯𝐷superscript𝐩subscriptsuperscript𝑞~𝑞𝐱𝑡0differential-d𝐱𝜓superscript3770𝑚0𝛿𝐩superscript𝐩subscript𝐴𝜓𝐩subscript𝑝𝑚\displaystyle\langle D({\bf p})|\langle{\bar{D}}({\bf p^{\prime}})|{\int{{\cal H% }_{q^{\dagger}\tilde{q}}({\bf x},t=0)d{\bf x}}}|\psi(3770)^{m}(\vec{0})\rangle% =\delta({\bf p}+{\bf p}^{\prime})A_{\psi}(|{\bf p}|)p_{m},⟨ italic_D ( bold_p ) | ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ( bold_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) | ∫ caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT † end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over~ start_ARG italic_q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( bold_x , italic_t = 0 ) italic_d bold_x | italic_ψ ( 3770 ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG 0 end_ARG ) ⟩ = italic_δ ( bold_p + bold_p start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , (46)

which yields the expression for the decay width as given by

Γ[FT](ψ(3770)D(𝐩)D¯(𝐩))=γψ28π23|𝐩|3ED(|𝐩|)ED¯(|𝐩|)MψAψ(|𝐩|)2superscriptΓdelimited-[]𝐹𝑇𝜓3770𝐷𝐩¯𝐷𝐩superscriptsubscript𝛾𝜓28superscript𝜋23superscript𝐩3subscript𝐸𝐷𝐩subscript𝐸¯𝐷𝐩subscript𝑀𝜓subscript𝐴𝜓superscript𝐩2\displaystyle\Gamma^{[FT]}(\psi(3770)\rightarrow D({\bf p}){\bar{D}}(-{\bf p})% )=\gamma_{\psi}^{2}\frac{8\pi^{2}}{3}|{\bf p}|^{3}\frac{{E_{D}}(|{\bf p}|)E_{% \bar{D}}(|{\bf p}|)}{M_{\psi}}A_{\psi}(|{\bf p}|)^{2}roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ italic_F italic_T ] end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D ( bold_p ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ( - bold_p ) ) = italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 8 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG | bold_p | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (47)

where, ED(D¯)(|𝐩|)=(mD(D¯)2+|𝐩|2)1/2subscript𝐸𝐷¯𝐷𝐩superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝐷¯𝐷2superscript𝐩212E_{D(\bar{D})}(|{\bf p}|)=\big{(}m_{D({\bar{D}})}^{2}+|{\bf p}|^{2}\big{)}^{{1% }/{2}}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) = ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + | bold_p | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, with |𝐩|𝐩|{\bf p}|| bold_p |, the magnitude of the momentum of the outgoing D(D¯)𝐷¯𝐷D(\bar{D})italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) meson given by equation (43), and, Aψ(|𝐩|)subscript𝐴𝜓𝐩A_{\psi}(|{\bf p}|)italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( | bold_p | ) is a polynomial in |𝐩|𝐩|{\bf p}|| bold_p |. The parameter γψsubscript𝛾𝜓\gamma_{\psi}italic_γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is adjusted to reproduce the vacuum decay widths of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) to D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG amspmwg .

We might note that the expressions of the decay widths calculated using (I) the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model as well as (II) a field theoretical model of composite hadrons, as given by equations (44) and (47) have the forms of a polynomial multiplied by a gaussian function of |𝐩|𝐩|{\bf p}|| bold_p |, which depends only on the masses of the charmonium and the D(D¯)𝐷¯𝐷D(\bar{D})italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) mesons, as can be seen from equation (43). Within the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model, the polynomial dependence was observed to lead to an initial increase followed by a drop and even vanishing of the decay width with increase in the baryon density, in spite of the drop in the masses of the outgoing D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons friman ; amarvepja . A similar behaviour of an initial increase of the decay width of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) to the neutral DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG pair with increase in the magnetic field followed by a drop is observed in the magnetized hot nuclear (hyperonic) matter in the present work for both the models. As has already been mentioned, the masses of the D𝐷Ditalic_D, D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG and the charmonium state, ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) are the in-medium masses in the magnetized hot asymmetric nuclear (hyperonic) matter calculated in the chiral effective model. These are computed including the effects of the Dirac sea of baryons and due to PV mixing with additional contributions from lowest Landau levels for the charged open charm mesons HQ_DW_DS_AM_SPM_2023 .

Including the PV mixing effect, the expression for the decay width is modified to

ΓPV[3P0]([FT])(ψ(3770)(𝟎)D(𝐩)D¯(𝐩))=23Γ[3P0]([FT])(ψ(3770)D(𝐩)D¯(𝐩))\displaystyle\Gamma^{[^{3}P_{0}]([FT])}_{PV}(\psi(3770)({\bf 0})\rightarrow D(% {\bf p}){\bar{D}}(-{\bf p}))=\frac{2}{3}\Gamma^{[^{3}P_{0}]([FT])}(\psi(3770)% \rightarrow D({\bf p}){\bar{D}}(-{\bf p}))roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] ( [ italic_F italic_T ] ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_P italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_ψ ( 3770 ) ( bold_0 ) → italic_D ( bold_p ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ( - bold_p ) ) = divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] ( [ italic_F italic_T ] ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D ( bold_p ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ( - bold_p ) ) (48)
+\displaystyle++ 13Γ[3P0]([FT])(ψ(3770)D(𝐩)D¯(𝐩))(|𝐩||𝐩|(Mψ=MψPV)),\displaystyle\frac{1}{3}\Gamma^{[^{3}P_{0}]([FT])}(\psi(3770)\rightarrow D({% \bf p}){\bar{D}}(-{\bf p}))(|{\bf p}|\rightarrow|{\bf p}|(M_{\psi}=M_{\psi}^{% PV})),divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG roman_Γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] ( [ italic_F italic_T ] ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D ( bold_p ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ( - bold_p ) ) ( | bold_p | → | bold_p | ( italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_P italic_V end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) ) ,

where, Γ(ψ(3770)D(𝐩)D¯(𝐩)\Gamma(\psi(3770)\rightarrow D({\bf p}){\bar{D}}(-{\bf p})roman_Γ ( italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D ( bold_p ) over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ( - bold_p ) is given by expressions (44) and (47) for computation using (I) the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model and (II) the field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons. In equation (48), the first term corresponds to the transverse polarizations for the charmonium state, ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) whose masses remain unaffected by the PV mixing, whereas, the second term corresponds to the longitudinal component, whose mass is modified due to the mixing with the pseudoscalar meson in the presence of the magnetic field.

III.3 Production Cross-sections of Charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 )

The production cross-section of vector meson, V, due to scattering of particles aisubscript𝑎𝑖a_{i}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and bisubscript𝑏𝑖b_{i}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is given as charm_prod_NM_B ; am_spm_strange_spectral_fn ; Elena_16 ; Elena_17 ; Elena_13_1 ; BW_CS_Haglin ; BW_CS_Li

σi(M)=6π2ΓViq(mV,mai,mbi)2AV(M),subscript𝜎𝑖𝑀6superscript𝜋2superscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉𝑖𝑞superscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝑚𝑉subscriptsuperscript𝑚subscript𝑎𝑖subscriptsuperscript𝑚subscript𝑏𝑖2subscript𝐴𝑉𝑀\sigma_{i}(M)=6\pi^{2}\frac{{\Gamma_{V}^{i}}^{*}}{q({m^{*}_{V}},m^{*}_{a_{i}},% m^{*}_{b_{i}})^{2}}A_{V}(M),italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ) = 6 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_q ( italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ) , (49)

where,

AV(M)=C2πM2ΓV(M2mV2)2+(MΓV)2subscript𝐴𝑉𝑀𝐶2𝜋superscript𝑀2superscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉superscriptsuperscript𝑀2superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑉22superscript𝑀superscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉2A_{V}(M)=C\cdot\frac{2}{\pi}\frac{M^{2}\Gamma_{V}^{*}}{(M^{2}-{m_{V}^{*}}^{2})% ^{2}+(M\Gamma_{V}^{*})^{2}}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ) = italic_C ⋅ divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_π end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_M roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG (50)

is the relativistic Breit Wigner spectral function expressed in terms of the invariant mass M𝑀Mitalic_M, the mass and decay width of the vector meson, mVsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑉m_{V}^{*}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ΓV=jΓVjsuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉subscript𝑗superscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉𝑗\Gamma_{V}^{*}={\sum_{j}}{\Gamma_{V}^{j}}^{*}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_j end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, in the magnetized matter, and, maisubscriptsuperscript𝑚subscript𝑎𝑖m^{*}_{a_{i}}italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and mbisubscriptsuperscript𝑚subscript𝑏𝑖m^{*}_{b_{i}}italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are the in-medium masses of the scattering particles aisubscript𝑎𝑖a_{i}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and bisubscript𝑏𝑖b_{i}italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in channel i𝑖iitalic_i. In equation (49), q(mV,mai,mbi)𝑞superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑉superscriptsubscript𝑚subscript𝑎𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑚subscript𝑏𝑖q(m_{V}^{*},m_{a_{i}}^{*},m_{b_{i}}^{*})italic_q ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) is the momentum of the scattering particle ai(bi)subscript𝑎𝑖subscript𝑏𝑖a_{i}(b_{i})italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) in the center of mass frame of the vector meson, V𝑉Vitalic_V. The normalization constant, C𝐶Citalic_C in the spectral function is determined from 0AV(M)𝑑M=1.superscriptsubscript0subscript𝐴𝑉𝑀differential-d𝑀1\int_{0}^{\infty}A_{V}(M)dM=1.∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ) italic_d italic_M = 1 . In the present work, the production cross-section of the ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) in channel i=I,II𝑖𝐼𝐼𝐼i=I,IIitalic_i = italic_I , italic_I italic_I arises from the two-body scatterings of (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (II) D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons respectively. In the magnetized hot isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter, these are calculated accounting for the Dirac sea and PV (ψ(3770)ηc𝜓3770superscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\psi(3770)-\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, DD(D+D+,D0D0)𝐷superscript𝐷superscript𝐷superscriptsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷0superscriptsuperscript𝐷0D-D^{*}(D^{+}-{D^{*}}^{+},\;D^{0}-{D^{*}}^{0})italic_D - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) and D¯D¯(DD,D0¯D¯0)¯𝐷superscript¯𝐷superscript𝐷superscriptsuperscript𝐷¯superscript𝐷0superscript¯superscript𝐷0\bar{D}-{{\bar{D}}^{*}}({D^{-}}-{{D^{*}}^{-}},\;{\bar{D^{0}}}-{{{\bar{D^{*}}}}% ^{0}})over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG - over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG - over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT )) mixing effects for the masses of these mesons. The decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG is obtained using the light quark antiquark pair creation models, (I) P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model, as well as (II) a field theoretical model of composite hadrons, described in the previous subsection.

The PV mixing effect introduces mass difference between the longitudinal and transverse components of the vector charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) since the longitudinal component undergoes mass modification due to mixing with the pseudoscalar meson ηcsuperscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, whereas the transverse component is unaffected due to PV mixing. In the presence of PV mixing, the production cross-section of the vector meson, V, is given as

σi(M)=6π2(13ΓViLq(mVL,mai,mbi)2AVL(M)+23ΓViTq(mVT,mai,mbi)2AVT(M)),subscript𝜎𝑖𝑀6superscript𝜋213superscriptsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉𝑖𝐿𝑞superscriptsuperscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝑚𝑉𝐿subscriptsuperscript𝑚subscript𝑎𝑖subscriptsuperscript𝑚subscript𝑏𝑖2superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑉𝐿𝑀23superscriptsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉𝑖𝑇𝑞superscriptsuperscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝑚𝑉𝑇subscriptsuperscript𝑚subscript𝑎𝑖subscriptsuperscript𝑚subscript𝑏𝑖2superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑉𝑇𝑀\sigma_{i}(M)=6\pi^{2}\Bigg{(}\frac{1}{3}\frac{{{\Gamma_{V}^{*}}^{i}}^{L}}{q({% {m^{*}_{V}}^{L}},m^{*}_{a_{i}},m^{*}_{b_{i}})^{2}}A_{V}^{L}(M)+\frac{2}{3}% \frac{{{\Gamma_{V}^{*}}^{i}}^{T}}{q({{m^{*}_{V}}^{T}},m^{*}_{a_{i}},m^{*}_{b_{% i}})^{2}}A_{V}^{T}(M)\Bigg{)},italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_M ) = 6 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_q ( italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_M ) + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG divide start_ARG roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_q ( italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_b start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_M ) ) , (51)

for channel i=I,II𝑖𝐼𝐼𝐼i=I,IIitalic_i = italic_I , italic_I italic_I corresponding to the scattering of the charged D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and neutral D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}{\bar{D^{0}}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons respectively. In the above equation, mVT(L)superscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝑚𝑉𝑇𝐿{m^{*}_{V}}^{T(L)}italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the mass of the transverse (longitudinal) component of the vector meson. ΓViT(L)superscriptsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉𝑖𝑇𝐿{{\Gamma_{V}^{*}}^{i}}^{T(L)}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the decay width of the transverse (longitudinal) component of the vector meson in channel i𝑖iitalic_i, with the total contribution to the decay width of the transverse (longitudinal) component arising from both the channels as given by ΓVT(L)=ΓVIT(L)+ΓVIIT(L)superscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉𝑇𝐿superscriptsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉𝐼𝑇𝐿superscriptsuperscriptsuperscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉𝐼𝐼𝑇𝐿{\Gamma_{V}^{*}}^{T(L)}={{\Gamma_{V}^{*}}^{I}}^{T(L)}+{{\Gamma_{V}^{*}}^{II}}^% {T(L)}roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_I italic_I end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In equation (51), AVT(L)(M)superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑉𝑇𝐿𝑀A_{V}^{T(L)}(M)italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_M ) is the contribution from the transverse (longitudinal) component to the spectral function of the vector meson, and is given as,

AVT(L)(M)=C2πM2ΓVT(L)(M2mVT(L)2)2+(MΓVT(L))2,superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑉𝑇𝐿𝑀𝐶2𝜋superscript𝑀2superscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉absent𝑇𝐿superscriptsuperscript𝑀2superscriptsubscriptsuperscript𝑚absent𝑇𝐿𝑉22superscript𝑀superscriptsubscriptΓ𝑉absent𝑇𝐿2A_{V}^{T(L)}(M)=C\cdot\frac{2}{\pi}\frac{M^{2}\Gamma_{V}^{*T(L)}}{\Big{(}M^{2}% -{{m^{*T(L)}_{V}}^{2}\Big{)}}^{2}+\Big{(}M\Gamma_{V}^{*T(L)}\Big{)}^{2}},italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_M ) = italic_C ⋅ divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG italic_π end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG ( italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( italic_M roman_Γ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ italic_T ( italic_L ) end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG , (52)

with the constant C𝐶Citalic_C determined from the normalization condition

0(13AVL(M)+23AVT(M))𝑑M=1.superscriptsubscript013superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑉𝐿𝑀23superscriptsubscript𝐴𝑉𝑇𝑀differential-d𝑀1\int_{0}^{\infty}\Big{(}\frac{1}{3}A_{V}^{L}(M)+\frac{2}{3}A_{V}^{T}(M)\Big{)}% dM=1.∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_M ) + divide start_ARG 2 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_M ) ) italic_d italic_M = 1 . (53)

IV Results and discussions

In the present investigation, we study the charmonium production in magnetized hot isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter. Strong magnetic fields are estimated to be produced in ultra-relativistic peripheral collisions where the created matter is extremely diltute. In the present study, we study the production cross-section of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), which is the lowest charmonium state which decays to DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in vacuum. As has been described in the previous section, the mass modifications of the open charm (D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) mesons and the charmoium state, ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) are calculated within a generalized chiral effective model amarindam ; amarvdmesonTprc ; amarvepja . The medium modifications of the masses of these mesons are calculated including the effects of the baryonic Dirac sea (DS). In the presence of an external magnetic field, the masses of these mesons are additionally modified due to the mixing of the pseudoscalar meson with the longitudinal component of the vector meson (PV mixing) and these modifications are observed to be quite significant for high magnetic fields. The decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in hot isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter in the presence of an external magnetic field is calculated from the medium modifications of the masses of the initial and final state mesons. Using the in-medium mass and decay width, the production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), arising from scatterings of D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as well as D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons, are computed from the relativistic Breit-Wigner spectral function. As can be seen later, these production cross-sections, have distinct peak positions in the invariant mass spectra, since the longitudinal component of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) undergoes a positive mass shift due to mixing with ηc(2S)subscript𝜂𝑐2𝑆\eta_{c}(2S)italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_S ), whereas, the masses of the transverse components remain unaffected by PV mixing.

The in-medium masses of the open charm mesons (D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) within the chiral effective model are obtained, due to their interactions with the baryons and the scalar mesons. These are calculated by solving the dispersion relation given by equation (34), where the self energies of the D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG are given by equations (35) and (36) respectively. Within the mean field approximation, the scalar (the nonstrange isoscalar, σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ, the strange isoscalar ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ and the nonstrange isovector, δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ) fields, along with the dilaton field, χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ and the vector fields, are solved from their coupled equations of motion, given by equations (19)–(25), for given values of the temperature and the magnetic field for zero density, as well as, for hadronic matter for given baryon density, strangeness, fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and isospin asymmetry parameter, η𝜂\etaitalic_η. The charmonium mass shift is obtained from the value of the dilaton field using equation (40). In the present work, the anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) of the baryons are taken into account.

Figures 1 and 2 show the dependence of the scalar fields σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ, ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ and δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ (which are related to the light quark condensates through equation (11)) on the magnetic field, for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, for symmetric and asymmetric (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) matter respectively. These are plotted for the cases of nuclear matter (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0) and for strange hadronic matter (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) and compared to the results with zero baryon density. In the present work, the finite anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) of the baryons are incorporated. The values of the scalar fields are plotted with effects of the baryon Dirac sea and compared to the case when the Dirac sea effects are not considered (shown as closely and widely spaced dotted lines for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ρ0subscript𝜌0\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, respectively). The effects of the strangeness in the medium is observed to lead to significant modifications to the scalar fields both for symmetric and asymmmetric matter. Contrary to the case of ρBsubscript𝜌𝐵\rho_{B}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0 Sourodeep2023 , for the magnetized nuclear matter (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0), at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, there is observed to be a decrease in the magnitude of the scalar fields σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ (muu¯u+mdd¯dsimilar-toabsentsubscript𝑚𝑢delimited-⟨⟩¯𝑢𝑢subscript𝑚𝑑delimited-⟨⟩¯𝑑𝑑\sim m_{u}\langle\bar{u}u\rangle+m_{d}\langle\bar{d}d\rangle∼ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_u end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_u end_ARG italic_u ⟩ + italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_d end_ARG italic_d ⟩) as well as ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ (mss¯ssimilar-toabsentsubscript𝑚𝑠delimited-⟨⟩¯𝑠𝑠\sim m_{s}\langle\bar{s}s\rangle∼ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟨ over¯ start_ARG italic_s end_ARG italic_s ⟩) fields with increase in the magnetic field, an effect called the inverse magnetic catalysis, when the AMMs of the nucleons are taken into account. As has been shown in Ref. Sourodeep2023 , the opposite effect of magnetic catalysis is observed in magnetized nuclear (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0) matter for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at zero temperature, when the nucleon AMMs are ignored. In the magnetized nuclear matter, for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, including the contributions of the Dirac sea and anomalous magnetic moments of the nucleons leads to the inverse magnetic catalysis effect, also at finite temperatures. For magnetic field eB=4mπ2𝑒𝐵4superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=4m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 4 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the values of scalar field σ(ζ)𝜎𝜁\sigma\left(\zeta\right)italic_σ ( italic_ζ ) are observed to be 58.3958.39-58.39- 58.39 (96.8996.89-96.89- 96.89), 60.3360.33-60.33- 60.33 (97.3297.32-97.32- 97.32), 63.1163.11-63.11- 63.11 (97.9697.96-97.96- 97.96) and 64.3864.38-64.38- 64.38 (98.2698.26-98.26- 98.26) MeV at temperatures T=0,50,100𝑇050100T=0,50,100italic_T = 0 , 50 , 100 and 150150150150 MeV, respectively. When the strength of magnetic field is increased to eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, these are modified to 49.04(95.02)49.0495.02-49.04(-95.02)- 49.04 ( - 95.02 ), 51.97(95.57)51.9795.57-51.97(-95.57)- 51.97 ( - 95.57 ), 56.42(96.47)56.4296.47-56.42(-96.47)- 56.42 ( - 96.47 ) and 40.44(93.59)40.4493.59-40.44(-93.59)- 40.44 ( - 93.59 ) MeV, respectively. We observe that the percentage drop in the magnitude of scalar field σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ (ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ) is 16.01%(1.93%)percent16.01percent1.9316.01\%(1.93\%)16.01 % ( 1.93 % ), 13.86%(1.80%)percent13.86percent1.8013.86\%(1.80\%)13.86 % ( 1.80 % ), 10.60%(1.53%)percent10.60percent1.5310.60\%(1.53\%)10.60 % ( 1.53 % ) and 37.19%(4.7537.19\%(4.7537.19 % ( 4.75%) at T=0, 50, 100 and 150 MeV respectively. As can be seen, initially when temperature is increased from T =0 to 100 MeV, the value of the percentage drop decreases. However, at large value of temperature (T=150𝑇150T=150italic_T = 150 MeV) and stronger magnetic field, the magnitudes of the scalar fields decrease much more rapidly with increasing magnetic field. This implies that for large value of temperature and stronger magnetic field, the inverse magnetic catalysis is observed in nuclear matter. This observation is also consistent with lattice QCD observations where the finite temperature and stronger magnetic field is observed to show the effect of inverse magnetic catalysis.

At zero temperature and for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, an increase in the value of isospin asymmetry parameter η𝜂\etaitalic_η from zero to finite value (say η𝜂\etaitalic_η = 0.3) is observed to cause less drop in the magnitude of scalar field. As temperature is increased the impact of η𝜂\etaitalic_η is observed to weaken, i.e., values of scalar fields at finite η𝜂\etaitalic_η start approaching the values observed at η=0𝜂0\eta=0italic_η = 0. In nuclear medium, at sufficiently high T𝑇Titalic_T (for example at T = 150 MeV) the drop in the value of scalar fields is observed to be more at η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3 as compared to η=0𝜂0\eta=0italic_η = 0. To quote in terms of numbers, we observe that for magnetic field eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and isospin asymmetry η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3, the values of scalar fields σ(ζ)𝜎𝜁\sigma(\zeta)italic_σ ( italic_ζ ) are observed to be 52.02(95.58)52.0295.58-52.02(-95.58)- 52.02 ( - 95.58 ), 54.61(96.09)54.6196.09-54.61(-96.09)- 54.61 ( - 96.09 ), 59.03(97.03)59.0397.03-59.03(-97.03)- 59.03 ( - 97.03 ) and 37.96(93.24)37.9693.24-37.96(-93.24)- 37.96 ( - 93.24 ) MeV at temperature T=0,50,100𝑇050100T=0,50,100italic_T = 0 , 50 , 100 and 150150150150 MeV. As can be seen, at T𝑇Titalic_T=150 MeV, the magnitude of scalar fields at η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3 are observed to be smaller as compared to the values quoted earlier for η=0𝜂0\eta=0italic_η = 0 case. This implies that at high temperatures and for strong magnetic fields, inverse magnetic catalysis is more favored in asymmetric nuclear matter as compared to symmetric nuclear matter, although the effect is small. It may be noted that the anomalous magnetic moments of nucleons are observed to affect the behavior of scalar fields more significantly in presence of finite Dirac sea as compared to when Dirac sea contributions are ignored. In the absence of the Dirac sea contributions, but accounting for the finite anomalous magnetic moments of the baryons, the magnitude of scalar field increases with increasing the strength of magnetic field, at low and moderate temperature which implies that the magnetic catalysis effect is observed. However, at high temperature such T=150𝑇150T=150italic_T = 150 MeV, the magnitude of scalar fields is observed to decrease with increase in the strength of magnetic field. It is observed that the impact of magnetic field is much more appreciable in presence of finite Dirac sea contributions, and the effect is particularly significant for stronger magnetic field and high temperature case.

We next study the effects of finite strangeness fraction on the behaviour of the scalar fields (σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ, ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ and δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ). At ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the inclusion of hyperons along with nucleons significantly alters the behaviour of scalar fields as a function of magnetic field, when the contributions due to the baryonic Dirac sea is taken into account. The solutions of the scalar fields exist upto eB5mπ2similar-to𝑒𝐵5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB\sim 5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B ∼ 5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, in the strange hadronic matter (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) when the Dirac sea contributions and the AMMs of the baryons are taken into account. For ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, the scalar fields, which have solutions for values of eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B upto 4(2.8)mπ2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2m_{\pi}^{2}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, when the Dirac sea contributions of the nucleons (and hyperons) are taken into account, along with the results when the DS effects are not considered, are plotted in figures 1 and 2. The non-existence of the solutions above a critical value of the magnetic field can be understood in the following way. For vacuum (ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, T𝑇Titalic_T=0) of nuclear matter, the total scalar densities of the nucleons are solely due to contributions of the Dirac sea, and, the effective mass, misuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖m_{i}^{*}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT satisfies the equation

mimi=Ci[(qiB)23mi+{(κiB)2mi+(|qi|B)(κiB)}(12+2ln(mimi))].superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝐶𝑖delimited-[]superscriptsubscript𝑞𝑖𝐵23superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜅𝑖𝐵2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵subscript𝜅𝑖𝐵122lnsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝑚𝑖m_{i}^{*}-m_{i}={C_{i}}\Bigg{[}\frac{(q_{i}B)^{2}}{3m_{i}^{*}}+\{(\kappa_{i}B)% ^{2}m_{i}^{*}+(|q_{i}|B)(\kappa_{i}B)\}\Big{(}\frac{1}{2}+2{\rm ln}\Big{(}% \frac{m_{i}^{*}}{m_{i}}\Big{)}\Big{)}\Bigg{]}.italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT [ divide start_ARG ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG + { ( italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + ( | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_B ) ( italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) } ( divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG + 2 roman_l roman_n ( divide start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ) ] . (54)

where Ci=Ai/(4π2)subscript𝐶𝑖subscript𝐴𝑖4superscript𝜋2C_{i}=A_{i}/(4\pi^{2})italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / ( 4 italic_π start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ), with Aisubscript𝐴𝑖A_{i}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT defined in equation (31). In the simplifying assumption of neglecting the logarithm term in the last term on the right hand side of the above equation, misuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖m_{i}^{*}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT satisfies the quadratic equation

(1Ci(κiB)2)mi2(mi+Ci|qiB|(κiB)2)miCi(qiB)23=0.1subscript𝐶𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜅𝑖𝐵2superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖2subscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝐶𝑖subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵subscript𝜅𝑖𝐵2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝐶𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑞𝑖𝐵230(1-C_{i}(\kappa_{i}B)^{2}){m_{i}^{*}}^{2}-\Big{(}m_{i}+\frac{C_{i}|q_{i}B|(% \kappa_{i}B)}{2}\Big{)}m_{i}^{*}-\frac{C_{i}(q_{i}B)^{2}}{3}=0.( 1 - italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B | ( italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG = 0 . (55)

For real solutions for misuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖m_{i}^{*}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, we should have (mi+Ci|qiB|(κiB)2)243(1Ci(κiB)2)Ci(qiB)2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖subscript𝐶𝑖subscript𝑞𝑖𝐵subscript𝜅𝑖𝐵22431subscript𝐶𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜅𝑖𝐵2subscript𝐶𝑖superscriptsubscript𝑞𝑖𝐵2\Big{(}m_{i}+\frac{C_{i}|q_{i}B|(\kappa_{i}B)}{2}\Big{)}^{2}\geq\frac{4}{3}(1-% C_{i}(\kappa_{i}B)^{2})C_{i}(q_{i}B)^{2}( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + divide start_ARG italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B | ( italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≥ divide start_ARG 4 end_ARG start_ARG 3 end_ARG ( 1 - italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Also, for Ci(κiB)21subscript𝐶𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜅𝑖𝐵21C_{i}(\kappa_{i}B)^{2}\geq 1italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≥ 1, i.e., for the value of the magnetic field above a critical value of Bcrit1/(Ciκi2)1/2similar-tosubscript𝐵𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡1superscriptsubscript𝐶𝑖superscriptsubscript𝜅𝑖212B_{crit}\sim{1/(C_{i}{\kappa_{i}}^{2})}^{1/2}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_r italic_i italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 1 / ( italic_C start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_κ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 / 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the above equation does not have a positive solution for misuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖m_{i}^{*}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, both for the charged (qi0subscript𝑞𝑖0q_{i}\neq 0italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≠ 0) and neutral (qi=0subscript𝑞𝑖0q_{i}=0italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0) baryons. It might be noted that the above equation corresponds to the case when there are no meson-meson interaction terms for the scalar fields in the Lagrangian. In the presence of these quartic interaction terms (as given by equation (7)) in the chiral model, the effective masses of the baryons, mi(=gσiσgζiζgδiδ)annotatedsuperscriptsubscript𝑚𝑖absentsubscript𝑔𝜎𝑖𝜎subscript𝑔𝜁𝑖𝜁subscript𝑔𝛿𝑖𝛿m_{i}^{*}(=-g_{\sigma i}\sigma-g_{\zeta i}\zeta-g_{\delta i}\delta)italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( = - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ζ - italic_g start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_δ ), are obtained from the scalar fields, which are solved, along with the dilaton field, χ𝜒\chiitalic_χ and the vector fields, from their coupled equations of motion given by equations (19) – (25). In the absence of hyperons, the scalar densities of nucleons, for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, are solely due to the negative contributions of the Dirac sea, which leads to an increase in the magnitudes of the scalar fields (hence an enhancement of the light quark condensates) with increase in the strength of the magnetic field. This effect of magnetic catalysis for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 is observed, for both the cases of without and with the effects from the nucleon anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) haber2014 ; Arghya2018 ; Sourodeep2023 ; Parui_D12023 ; HQ_DW_DS_AM_SPM_2023 . In the present investigation of strange hadronic matter at finite temperatures in the presence of a magnetic field, for fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3 and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the number densities for the hyperons remain negligible (except for ΞsuperscriptΞ\Xi^{-}roman_Ξ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) and hence the contributions to the total scalar densities of these heyperons turn out to be negative, solely due to the contributions from the Dirac sea, as given by equation (32). It is observed that the solutions for the scalar fields do not exist for values of the magnetic field above a critical value (eBcrit5mπ2similar-to𝑒subscript𝐵𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB_{crit}\sim 5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c italic_r italic_i italic_t end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼ 5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for fs=0.3subscript𝑓𝑠0.3f_{s}=0.3italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3 and η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3), similar to the situation of the vacuum in nuclear matter, for reasons described above. Also, as the magnetic field is raised, for the hyperons, which are absent for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the total scalar densities are negative, solely due to the Dirac sea contributions, leading to an increase in the magnitudes of scalar fields (σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ and ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ), leading to magnetic catalysis effect in the magnetized strange hadronic matter (with fs=0.3subscript𝑓𝑠0.3f_{s}=0.3italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3), contrary to the opposite behaviour of the scalar fields (hence of the light quark condensate) with magnetic field for the nuclear matter at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, when the AMMs of the baryons are taken into account. In the presence of Dirac sea contributions from the nucleons (hyperons along with nucleons), the effect of magnetic catalysis (an increase in the magnitude of scalar fields with increasing magnetic field strength) is observed for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, as might be seen from figures 1 and 2.

In figures 3 and 4, the masses of the D(D0,D+)𝐷superscript𝐷0superscript𝐷D(D^{0},D^{+})italic_D ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) mesons are plotted as functions of eB/mπ2𝑒𝐵superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB/m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B / italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for the magnetized asymmetric matter (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) at nuclear matter saturation density (ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) for the nuclear (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0) and hyperonic matter (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) respectively. In the left panel of these figures, results for the mass modifications of D𝐷Ditalic_D mesons are also shown at ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, considering magnetized Dirac sea of nucleons and in the right panel, due to both the nucleons as well as hyperons. The anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) of the baryons are taken into account in the present study. The D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT masses are shown for values of the temperature T=50, 100 and 150 MeV. The in-medium behaviors of the scalar fields are reflected in the medium modification of D𝐷Ditalic_D meson properties. The lowest Landau level (LLL) contribution is taken into account for the charged D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT meson. At finite baryon density, in the absence of Dirac sea contributions, when the PV mixing is not taken into account, one observes the mass of the neutral D𝐷Ditalic_D meson to be insensitive to the variation in the magnetic field whereas D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mass shows a steady increase due to the LLL contributions. Including the Dirac sea contributions and the anomalous magnetic moments of nucleons, initially the in-medium mass of D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT meson is seen to increase with magnetic field upto a certain value and then starts decreasing with further increase in eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B. The drop in the mass at higher values of magnetic field is observed to be sharper as the temperature is raised from T=50 MeV to T=100 and 150 MeV. In the presence of PV (DD𝐷superscript𝐷D-D^{*}italic_D - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) mixing, there is seen to be a drop in the mass of both the D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mesons, which is observed to be much more pronounced for the neutral D𝐷Ditalic_D meson. The effect of the isospin asymmetry is observed to be small. For example, for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and fs=0subscript𝑓𝑠0f_{s}=0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 the value of the D+(D0)superscript𝐷superscript𝐷0D^{+}(D^{0})italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) mass (in MeV) is observed to be 1736.5 (1585.9) for eB=10mπ2𝑒𝐵10superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=10m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 10 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for T=50 MeV and 1615.86 (1416.3) at T=150 MeV for the same value of the magnetic field for η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3, when the Dirac sea as well as PV mixing are taken into account, in addition to LLL contribution for D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT meson, which may be compared to the η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0 values of 1732.85 (1554.5) and 1625.6 (1414.9) at T=50 and T=150 MeV respectively. Thus the isospin asymmetry effect is small, but larger for neutral D𝐷Ditalic_D meson at smaller temperature of T=50 MeV, whereas, for D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mass, the effect of isospin asymmetry is observed to be marginal.

The effect of strangeness is shown in figure 4, which shows the magnetic field dependence of the D𝐷Ditalic_D meson masses for the asymmetric (η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3) hyperonic matter (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Similar to the case of asymmetric (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) nuclear matter (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0) as shown in figure 3, in the absence of the Dirac sea contributions, the D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mass is observed to be insensitive to the variation in the magnetic field, whereas the LLL contribution leads to a monotonic increase in the mass of D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mesons with eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B, when the PV (DD𝐷superscript𝐷D-D^{*}italic_D - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) mixing is not taken into account. The PV mixing leads to a drop in the masses of both D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, with a much larger decrease for D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mass, as has been observed for the case of magnetized nuclear matter (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0). At ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in the presence of the Dirac sea contributions, the solutions for the scalar fields exist only upto a value of eB=5mπ2𝑒𝐵5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, as has already been mentioned. There is observed to be an increase in the mass of D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as was observed for fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0 case upto eB=5mπ2𝑒𝐵5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. For zero magnetic field, when the strangeness fraction fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is changed from 0 to 0.3, the value of the mass of D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) is modified from 1797.9 (1792.2) to 1791 (1799.8) for T=50 MeV, and 1801.86 (1798.1) to 1794.8 (1803.9) for T=150 MeV. For eB=5mπ2𝑒𝐵5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the modifications in the masses due to increase in η𝜂\etaitalic_η from 0 to 0.3 are 1857 (1788.4) to 1855.7 (1801.8) and 1884.5 (1816.5) to 1882.1 (1826.1) for T=50 and T=150 MeV respectively. The effects of the isospin asymmetry on the D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT meson masses for the strange hadronic matter are thus observed to be similar to the symmetric case. As has already been mentioned, at zero baryon density, in the presence of magnetized Dirac sea of nucleons (nucleons and hyperons), the solutions of scalar fields exist upto eB4(2.8)mπ2similar-to𝑒𝐵42.8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB\sim 4(2.8)m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B ∼ 4 ( 2.8 ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The D𝐷Ditalic_D mesons masses for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 with the Dirac sea contributions are plotted upto these values of magnetic field in figures 3 and 4. The LLL contribution (for the charged D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT meson) causes an increase in the mass as a function of magnetic field both at zero baryon density as well as at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, whereas the mass decreases due to the PV mixing. At zero baryon density, the effects of Dirac sea contributions due to nucleons (nucleon and hyperons) on the in-medium masses of the D+superscript𝐷D^{+}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0superscript𝐷0D^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mesons are observed to be marginal as compared to when these effects are ignored, upto a value of eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B around 3.5(2)mπ23.52superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋23.5(2)m_{\pi}^{2}3.5 ( 2 ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT beyond which there is observed to be a drop with further increase in the magnetic field.

The dependence of in-medium masses of Dsuperscript𝐷D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0¯¯superscript𝐷0\bar{D^{0}}over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons on the magnetic field are shown in figures 5 and 6 for values of the isospin asymmetry parameter η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3, for magnetized nuclear (fs=0subscript𝑓𝑠0f_{s}=0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0) and hyperonic (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) matter respectively, at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, along with the results for zero baryon density. At ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in magnetized nuclear matter (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0), for a given magnetic field strength, the in-medium masses of D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons are observed to be larger than the masses of the D𝐷Ditalic_D mesons. However, the trend of variation of in-medium masses of D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons as functions of the magnetic field are found to be similar to those of the D𝐷Ditalic_D mesons. The effects of the isospin asymmetry of the nuclear medium on the masses of the D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons are observed to be small compared to the effects from the Dirac sea and PV mixing effects, similar to what was observed for the D𝐷Ditalic_D mesons. As has already been mentioned, at finite strangeness fraction with fs=0.3subscript𝑓𝑠0.3f_{s}=0.3italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.3 and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the solutions for the scalar fields exist only upto eB=5mπ2𝑒𝐵5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, when the Dirac sea contributions are considered by summing over the tadpole diagrams in the weak magnetic field limit. Similar to the mass of the D𝐷Ditalic_D meson, the D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG meson masses are observed to increase with magnetic field upto 5mπ25superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋25m_{\pi}^{2}5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. As has been observed for the D𝐷Ditalic_D mesons, the masses of D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons have very small effect from the isospin asymmetry for the nuclear as well as hyperonic matter. For ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, the behaviour of D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG masses are observed to be similar to the masses of the D𝐷Ditalic_D mesons.

At finite density, the dominant magnetic field effects on the D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons are due to the Dirac sea and PV mixng and the effects of isospin asymmetry are observed to be marginal. The qualitative trends of the D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG masses both for the nuclear and hyperonic matter are observed to be similar at temperatures (T=50, 100 and 150 MeV) considered in the present study. However, in nuclear matter (both for η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0 and 0.3), the masses of all these mesons are observed to initially increase followed by a drop, but the value of eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B where the masses start decreasing, are observed to be smaller when the temperature is raised and the value is much smaller for T=150 MeV.

The in-medium mass of charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) as function of eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B is shown in figure 7 for the asymmetric (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) nuclear matter (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0) and the hyperonic matter (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3), at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, along with results for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0. At finite ρBsubscript𝜌𝐵\rho_{B}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in the presence of Dirac sea contributions, in nuclear matter, both for symmetric and asymmetric cases, there is observed to be an increase in the mass followed by a drop with further increase in the magnetic field. However, similar to the cases of D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG meson masses, the effects of isospin asymmetry are observed to be small for the charmonium (ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 )) mass. The value of eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B for which the behaviour changes from an increase in mass to a drop, is observed to be smaller when the temperature is raised. As has been already mentioned, the masses of the charmonium states are obtained from the medium change of the gluon condensate and also depend on the wave function of the particular state considered, using equation (40). The contribution from PV mixing leads to a negative (positive) contribution to the mass of the pseudoscalar (longitudinal component of the vector) meson. This is calculated from the phenomenological Lagrangian corresponding to the process VPγ𝑉𝑃𝛾V\rightarrow P\gammaitalic_V → italic_P italic_γ. For T=150 MeV, the mass of the ψ(3770)ψ(1D)𝜓3770𝜓1𝐷\psi(3770)\equiv\psi(1D)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) ≡ italic_ψ ( 1 italic_D ) turns out to be smaller than the mass of ηcηc(2S)superscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐subscript𝜂𝑐2𝑆\eta_{c}^{\prime}\equiv\eta_{c}(2S)italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≡ italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 2 italic_S ) for eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B larger than around 8.5 mπ2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2m_{\pi}^{2}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, due to which the process ψ(3770)ηc𝜓3770superscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\psi(3770)\rightarrow\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is no longer kinematically possible. The effect due to PV mixing on the mass of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) exist upto eB=8.5mπ2𝑒𝐵8.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for T=150 MeV, for symmetric and asymmetric nuclear matter. These can be seen from panel (e) of figure 7 for asymmetric nuclear matter. At ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in the presence of strangeness fraction, including the Dirac sea contributions, lead to solutions for the mass of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) upto eB=5mπ2𝑒𝐵5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, which is observed to increase with the magnetic field for the temperatures T=50, 100 and 150 MeV, both for isospin symmetric and asymmetric cases. This can be observed from panels (b), (d) and (f) for asymmetric hyperonic matter in figure 7. At zero baryon density, with magnetized Dirac sea of nucleons (and hyperons), the effective masses of charmonium state (calculated from the medium change of the dilaton field) are obtained upto 4(2.8)mπ242.8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋24(2.8)m_{\pi}^{2}4 ( 2.8 ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, due to non-existence of solutions of scalar fields above these values of magnetic field. The DS effects are observed to be marginal for eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B upto around 3.5(2)mπ23.52superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋23.5(2)m_{\pi}^{2}3.5 ( 2 ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT above which there is observed to be a drop in the charmonium mass.

Figure 8 shows the dependence of the partial decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG, along with the contributions from the subchannels (I) ψ(3770)D+D𝜓3770superscript𝐷superscript𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D^{+}D^{-}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (II) ψ(3770)D0D0¯𝜓3770superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0\psi(3770)\rightarrow D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG, computed using the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model. These decay widths are shown for magnetized matter for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and also for asymmetric (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) nuclear as well as hyperonic matter (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and for values of temperature as 50, 100 and 150 MeV. The medium modifications of the decay widths arise due to the medium modifications of the masses of the intial and final states as calculated using the chiral model including the effects of the baryonic Dirac sea, with additional contributions from PV mixing as well as the lowest Landau level (LLL) for the charged open charm mesons. The effects due to the PV mixing (ψ(3770)ηc𝜓3770superscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\psi(3770)-\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, DD𝐷superscript𝐷D-D^{*}italic_D - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D¯D¯¯𝐷¯superscript𝐷\bar{D}-\bar{D^{*}}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG - over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG) are considered. These decay widths are compared with the values when the Dirac sea effects are not considered. When the PV mixing effects are not taken into account, the decay width of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) to D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG remains insensitive to the change in the magnetic field when the Dirac sea contributions are not considered as the masses are almost unaffected by the magnetic field for the neutral open charm mesons Reddy2018 and the charmonium state Amal2018 . However, in the absence of Dirac sea effects, the decay width to the charged DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG final state is observed to decrease with increase in the magnetic field and vanish as the magnetic field is further increased, when the PV mixing effects are still not considered charmdecay_mag . This is due to LLL contributions which leads to a rise in the masses of the charged open charm mesons Reddy2018 . The incorporation of the PV mixing effects (due to ψ(3770)ηc𝜓3770superscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\psi(3770)-\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, D(D¯)D(D¯)𝐷¯𝐷superscript𝐷¯superscript𝐷D(\bar{D})-D^{*}(\bar{D^{*}})italic_D ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG ) - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG )) is observed to lead to significant modifications to the decay widths of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) to the charged and neutral DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG due to the magnetic field, both for nuclear and strange hadronic matter. Accounting for the PV mixing, but when the Dirac sea (DS) effects of the baryons are not taken into consideration, within the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model, there is observed to be an intial slow decrease in the decay width for the charged DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons channel with the increase in the magnetic field, which remains almost constant at higher values of the magnetic field, whereas, the neutral DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG channel shows an initial increase followed by a drop with further increase in the value of the magnetic field. This behaviour is observed for symmetric as well as asymmetric (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) for both nuclear matter and hyperonic matter. This can be seen from figure 8, plotted for asymmetric nuclear and hyperonic matter. In the presence of Dirac sea contributions, the behaviour of the decay widths with magnetic field remain similar and the effects from PV mixing are observed to dominate over the effects of Dirac sea. The decay widths, obtained upto eB4(2.8)mπ2similar-to𝑒𝐵42.8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB\sim 4(2.8)m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B ∼ 4 ( 2.8 ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with the effects of Dirac sea of the nucleons (and hyperons) for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, have similar trend as for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

The magnetic field dependence of the charmonium decay widths are shown for asymmetric nuclear and hyperonic matter in figure 9 using the field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons. At ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the decay width in asymmetric nuclear matter in the charged DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG channel is observed to decrease with the magnetic field upto eB6mπ2similar-to𝑒𝐵6superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB\sim 6m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B ∼ 6 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, beyond which there is observed to be a slow increase. The values of the decay width (in MeV) are observed to be 31.48, 19.12 and 24.86 for values of eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B (in units of mπ2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2m_{\pi}^{2}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) as 0, 6 and 10 respectively for T=50 MeV when the DS effects are taken into account. On the other hand, the decay width for the neutral DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG channel is observed to have a substantial increase with the magnetic field, from the value of 22.68 MeV at eB=0𝑒𝐵0eB=0italic_e italic_B = 0 reaching a maximum of around 78.3 MeV for eB7.5mπ2similar-to𝑒𝐵7.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB\sim 7.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B ∼ 7.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, for the same temperature, beyond which there is observed to be a slow drop as the magnetic field is further increased. This leads to the maximum value of the total decay width to be 98.9 MeV for eB=8.5mπ2𝑒𝐵8.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for T=50 MeV in asymmetric nuclear matter when the DS effects are taken into account. Similar behaviours of the decay widths are observed for the temperatures T=100 and 150 MeV for asymmetric nuclear matter. The Dirac sea (DS) contributions are observed to lead to smaller values of decay width, although the changes due to DS effects are marginal. In the presence of hyperons in the medium, the decay widths follow similar trend as for the nuclear matter for T=50, 100 and 150 MeV, as can be observed from figure 9. At ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the decay widths are plotted only upto eB=5mπ2𝑒𝐵5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for strange hadronic matter, when the DS effects are taken into account since the solutions for the scalar fields do not exist for eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B larger than 5mπ25superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋25m_{\pi}^{2}5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, as has already been mentioned. In figure 9, the decay widths of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) to charged and neutral DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG mesons, along with the total of both subchannels, obtained using the field theoretical model, are also plotted for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, and, are observed to have similar trend as obtained using the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model. The magnetic field effect on the decay width due to PV mixing is observed to dominate over the effect from Dirac sea within the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model as well as the field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons.

The production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), arising from the scattering of (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (II) D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons are plotted as functions of the invariant mass for magnetized asymmetric (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) nuclear (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0) and hyperonic (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) matter with ψ(3770)D+D(D0D0¯)𝜓3770superscript𝐷superscript𝐷superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0\psi(3770)\rightarrow D^{+}D^{-}(D^{0}\bar{D^{0}})italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) decay width computed using the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model in figures 10 and 11 and using FT model, in figures 12 and 13, at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for T=50, 100 and 150 MeV. These are plotted for values of eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. For ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, for which the results for the production cross-sections with the Dirac sea effects due to the nucleons (and hyperons) exist for eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B upto around 4(2.8)mπ242.8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋24(2.8)m_{\pi}^{2}4 ( 2.8 ) italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the production cross-sections are shown for eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (left panels of Figs. 1013). The PV (ψ(3770)ηc𝜓3770superscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\psi(3770)-\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) mixing modifies the mass of the longitudinal component of the charmonium state, ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), whereas, the transverse components remain unaffected due to PV mixing. There is observed to be well-separated distinct peak positions in the production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) due to scattering of (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (II) D0D¯0superscript𝐷0superscript¯𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D}^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT plotted as functions of the invariant mass, for the higher value of the magnetic field (eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT), as the PV mixing effects are more dominant with increase in the magnetic field. For magnetized asymmetric (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) nuclear matter, at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and for the values of temperatures of T=50, 100 and 150 MeV respectively, the production cross-sections due to the scattering of the D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}{\bar{D^{0}}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG are plotted as functions of the invariant mass in panels (a), (c), and (e) for eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and in panels (b), (d) and (f) for eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in figure 10. For D+D(D0D0¯)superscript𝐷superscript𝐷superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{+}D^{-}(D^{0}\bar{D^{0}})italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) channel, these are observed to be maximum at positions (in MeV) of 3706 (3706), 3722 (3722) and 3726 (3726) when the Dirac sea (DS) effects are taken into account, and 3708 (3708), 3724 (3722) and 3728 (3728), when these are not taken into consideration. It might be noted here that for the production cross-section due to scattering of D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as well as D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG has contributions due to the transverse and longitudinal components of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), which have different masses due to PV mixing. The masses (in MeV) of the longitudinal (transverse) component of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, fs=0subscript𝑓𝑠0f_{s}=0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3 and T=50, 100 and 150 MeV, are observed to be 3723.6 (3703.4), 3745.8 (3719.2) and 3744.1 (3725), in the presence of DS effects, and, 3725 (3705), 3740 (3720.7) and 3725 (3751), when the DS effects are neglected. It is thus observed that the production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) due to scattering of the charged as well as neutral DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG are peaked at position close to the transverse mass of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), for eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. At ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) due to the scatterings of (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (II) D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons are observed to be very similar for the magnetic field eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, with the value of the peak height to be marginally larger for the channel (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as compared to (II) D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG, as might be seen from panels (a), (c) and (e) for T=50, 100 and 150 MeV. However, both with as well as without DS effects, for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the peak height is observed to be much larger for the D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG as compared to the value for D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT scattering. E.g., the value of the peak height is 82.5mb for D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG is much marger as compared to the value of 59.8 mb for D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT scattering, for T=50 MeV, in the presence of DS effects. The effect of temperature on the production cross-sections is observed to be very small for eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. At the higher magnetic field of eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the masses with and without PV mixing are quite different, as can be seen from figure 7, with the values of 3644.4 (3774.26), 3682.9 (3806.65) and 3442 (3608.9) MeV for T=50, 100 and 150 MeV respectively, when the Dirac sea (DS) effects are taken into account, and at 3708.25 (3828.1), 3721.6 (3839.1) and 3702.2 (3823) MeV when these are not taken into consideration. The masses (in MeV) of the longitudinal (transverse) component of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, fs=0subscript𝑓𝑠0f_{s}=0italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, η=0.3𝜂0.3\eta=0.3italic_η = 0.3, eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, and T=50, 100 and 150 MeV, are observed to be 3774.3 (3644.4), 3806.7 (3682.9) and 3608.9 (3442), in the presence of DS effects, and, 3828.1 (3708.2), 3839.1 (3721) and 3823 (3702), when the DS effects are neglected. For the higher value of the magnetic field, eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, as can be seen from panels (b), (d) and (f) in figure 10 for temperatures T=50, 100 and 150 MeV respectively, the larger mass difference in the transverse and longitudinal components of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) leads to the peaks to be well separated, both for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as well as for ρBsubscript𝜌𝐵\rho_{B}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0. The positions of the peaks are observed to be close to the longitudinal (transverse) mass of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), due to the scattering of D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (D0D¯0superscript𝐷0superscript¯𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D}^{0}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) mesons. The production cross-sections from the D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT scatteting is observed to have additional peaks at positions close to the transverse (lower) mass of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) for T=50 and 100 MeV for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3, fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0), in the absence of the Dirac sea effects, as can be seen from panels (b) and (d) (as the widely-spaced dotted lines) of Fig. 10. It is observed that the individual production cross-sections are diminished for the higher value of the magnetic field, eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, with the heights of the peaks (in mb) to be given as 17.62 (17.57) and 26.12 (25.56) for T=50 (100) MeV and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, due to channels (I) and (II) respectively, in the presence of DS effects, as compared to the values of the heights to be 55.39 (54.85) and 54.15 (52.91) for eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. At ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, for T=150 MeV and eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, with DS effects, the peak heights (in mb) are observed to be 23.26 and 19.49 for channels (I) and (II) respectively, which are similar to the values of 24.52 and 18.94 to the case when DS effects are not taken into account.

In the presence of hyperons in the medium, when the Dirac sea effects are taken into account, there is observed to be an increase in the mass of charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) as calculated within the chiral effective model using equation (40), whose longitudinal component has a further positive shift due to the PV mixing, for T=50, 100 and 150 MeV, as can be seen for asymmetric (η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) strange (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) hadronic matter in figure 7. The behaviour of the charmonium mass is reflected in the peak positions of the production cross-section as plotted for the magnetized asymmetric strange hadronic matter in figure 11. The production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) are plotted in figure 11 for asymmetric (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) strange (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) hadronic matter for eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, for T=50, 100 and 150 MeV and ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (also, at ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 for eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT). For eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the behaviour of the production cross-sections in the channels (I) and (II) are observed to be similar to the case of asymmetric nuclear matter (shown in panels (a), (c) and (e) in figure 10). However, the peak positions are shifted to higher values when the DS effects are taken into consideration as compared to when the Dirac sea of the baryons are ignored. At ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the DS effects are observed to be larger as compared to the magnetized nuclear matter shown in figure 10. As has already been mentioned, at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, for eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B higher than 5mπ25superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋25m_{\pi}^{2}5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the solutions for the scalar fields do not exist for the strange hadronic matter, when the Dirac sea effects of baryons are taken into account in the weak magnetic field limit as used for the computation of the baryon self-energy accounting for the magnetized Dirac sea Arghya2018 . The dependence of the production cross-sections on the invariant mass are observed to be similar to the case of magnetized nuclear matter for the higher value of the magnetic field, eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, when the Dirac sea effects are not taken into account.

The production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) are plotted for magnetized asymmetric (with η𝜂\etaitalic_η=0.3) nuclear (fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0) and hyperonic (with fssubscript𝑓𝑠f_{s}italic_f start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0.3) matter in figures 12 and 13 using FT model, for values of eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. The larger values of the charmonium decay width obtained using the field theoretical (FT) model as compared to the values calculated within the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model are observed as a broadening of the peaks in the invariant mass plot of the production cross-section of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ). The effects from the temperature and strangeness are observed to be significant in the present study of the production cross-section of the charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) for higher values of the magnetic field, which are obtained from the in-medium mass and decay widths of the charmonium state in the magnetized nuclear (hyperonic) matter. The PV mixing effect is observed to dominate over the Dirac sea effect. In the invariant mass plot of production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) the production cross-sections for the scatterings from (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (II) D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG are observed to be peaked at the positions close to the mass of the longitudinal and transverse components of the charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) for higher values of the magnetic field (eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) for magnetized nuclear matter, when the DS effects are taken into consideration for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, as well as, for ρBsubscript𝜌𝐵\rho_{B}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=0, when the Dirac sea effects are not taken into account. In the absence of DS effects, for eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, both for the nuclear and hyperonic matter, additional peaks are observed for T=50 and 100 MeV for the production cross-section of the charmonium state in the charged DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG cahnnel, close to the transverse mass of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, as can be seen from panels (b) and (d) of figures 1013. For T=150 MeV, the peaks are observed to be appreciably well-separated as compared to the lower temperatures (T=50 and 100 MeV). The production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) can have consequences on the dilepton spectra as well as the production of the charmonium as well as open charm mesons produced in ultra-peripheral ultra-relativistic heavy ion collison experiments, since the magnetic field created in these collisions are extremely large and the charm mesons are created at the early stage of the collision.

V Summary

To summarize, in the present paper, we have investigated the charmonium production cross-sections due to scatterings of D+D(D0D0¯)superscript𝐷superscript𝐷superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{+}D^{-}(D^{0}\bar{D^{0}})italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG ) mesons, in the presence of an external magnetic field at finite temperatures, for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 as well as in isospin asymmetric nuclear (hyperonic) matter for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. In the peripheral ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions, strong magnetic fields are produced. However, since the created matter has extremely low density, we investigate the production cross-sections of the charmonium state, ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), which is the lowest state which decays to DD¯𝐷¯𝐷D\bar{D}italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in vacuum. The production cross-sections are calculated from the Breit-Wigner spectral function of the charmonium state, which is expressed in terms of its in-medium mass and decay width. The effects of Dirac sea as well as PV mixing, in addition to the lowest Landau level (LLL) contributions to the charged mesons, are taken into consideration to calculate the masses of the open charm (D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) mesons and the charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) and the subsequent effect on the partial decay width of ψ(3770)DD¯𝜓3770𝐷¯𝐷\psi(3770)\rightarrow D\bar{D}italic_ψ ( 3770 ) → italic_D over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG in magnetized isospin asymmetric nuclear (hyperonic) matter for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as well as for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0, at finite temperatures. The decay widths are calculated using two light quark-antiquark models: (I) the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model and (II) a field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons, and their effects on the production cross-section of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) are studied in the present work.

Within a chiral effective model, the in-medium masses of the open charm mesons are calculated from their interactions with the scalar (isoscalar σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ and isovector δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ) mesons and the baryons, whereas the mass modification of the charmonium state ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) is obtained from the medium change of a dilaton field, which simulates the gluon condensates of QCD. The anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) of the baryons are taken into consideration in the present work. At finite baryon density, accounting for the Dirac sea effects and the AMMs of the baryons, we observe the inverse magnetic catalysis (drop in the magnitude of the scalar fields σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ and ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ, which are proportional to the strengths of the light non-strange and strange quark condensates, with increase in the magnetic field) in magnetized nuclear matter, contrary to the opposite effect of magnetic catalysis (MC) at zero baryon density. The inclusion of the hyperons to the nuclear matter at finite baryon density is observed to lead to the effect of magnetic catalysis. The effect of (inverse) magnetic catalysis is observed to be enhanced with the increase in the temperature. In the absence of the Dirac sea effects, the scalar fields (σ𝜎\sigmaitalic_σ and ζ𝜁\zetaitalic_ζ) are observed to remain almost unaffected when the magnetic field is increased for temperatures T=50 and 100 MeV, whereas, there is observed to be a rise with eB𝑒𝐵eBitalic_e italic_B for T=150 MeV, both for the nuclear and hyperonic matter at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The effect due to the isospin asymmetry is observed to be marginal as compared to the Dirac sea effects. In the absence of Dirac sea as well as PV contributions, the neutral open charm meson masses are observed to be insensitive to the variation of the magnetic field within the chiral model, whereas, the masses of the charged D±superscript𝐷plus-or-minusD^{\pm}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ± end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT mesons have positive contributions from the lowest Landau level (LLL) leading to a monotonic increase as magnetic field is raised. At finite density, the PV mixing effects of the open charm mesons (DD𝐷superscript𝐷D-D^{*}italic_D - italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and D¯D¯¯𝐷¯superscript𝐷\bar{D}-\bar{D^{*}}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG - over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mixings) are observed to lead to drop in the masses of the pseudoscalar open charm (D𝐷Ditalic_D and D¯¯𝐷\bar{D}over¯ start_ARG italic_D end_ARG) mesons. The Dirac sea effects in nuclear matter for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT are observed to lead to an initial increase with increase in the magnetic field, followed by a drop of the open charm meson masses and the value for which it starts decreasing is smaller with increase in the temperature. In hyperonic matter, at ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the masses are observed to lead to an increase upto eB5mπ2similar-to𝑒𝐵5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB\sim 5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B ∼ 5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, upto which the solutions for the scalar fields can be found using the weak magnetic field approximation for obtaining the baryon self energy incorporating the Dirac sea contributions by summing over the tadpole diagrams.

The ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) mass is observed to show a similar trend as for the open charm mesons, when the Dirac effects are considered. The mass of the longitudinal component of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), is observed to increase due to the mixing with pseudoscalar meson, ηcsuperscriptsubscript𝜂𝑐\eta_{c}^{\prime}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Due to PV mixing, the production cross-section of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ), arising due to the scatterings of (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (II) D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons, are observed to have distinct peak positions in the invariant mass spectrum for the higher value of the magnetic field, eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, in the magnetized nuclear (hyperonic) matter for ρB=ρ0subscript𝜌𝐵subscript𝜌0\rho_{B}=\rho_{0}italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as well as for ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0. This arises due to the difference in the masses of the longitudinal and transverse components, since the former is modified, whereas, the transverse component is unaffected by PV mixing. In the presence of DS effects of the baryons, for eB=8mπ2𝑒𝐵8superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=8m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 8 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, it is observed that the production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) due to scatterings of (I) D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and (II) D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG mesons are peaked at the positions close to the masses of the longitudinal and transverse components of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) respectively. In the absence of the Dirac sea contributions, there are observed to be additional peaks for the charmonium cross-section arising from D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT scattering, at the positions close to the transverse mass of the charmonium state. For ρB=0subscript𝜌𝐵0\rho_{B}=0italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and eB=2.5mπ2𝑒𝐵2.5superscriptsubscript𝑚𝜋2eB=2.5m_{\pi}^{2}italic_e italic_B = 2.5 italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_π end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, the peak height is observed to be much larger for the D0D0¯superscript𝐷0¯superscript𝐷0D^{0}\bar{D^{0}}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over¯ start_ARG italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG as compared to the value for D+Dsuperscript𝐷superscript𝐷D^{+}D^{-}italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_D start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT scattering, with as well as without DS effects. The peak heights are observed to drop appreciably as the magnetic field is increased. There is observed to be appreciable increase in the separation between the peaks when the temperature is raised to 150 MeV. The charmonium decay widths calculated using the field theoretical (FT) model of composite hadrons are observed to be much larger than the values calculated using the P03superscriptsubscript𝑃03{}^{3}P_{0}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 3 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT model, which is reflected in the production cross-sections of ψ(3770)𝜓3770\psi(3770)italic_ψ ( 3770 ) as an appreciable broadening of the peaks. The present study of the charmonium production in isospin asymmetric strange hadronic matter at finite temperature and in presence of strong magnetic fields can have observational consequences on the production of the open and hidden charm mesons in asymmetric ultra-relativistic peripheral heavy ion collison experiments.

References

  • (1) T. Vachaspati, Phys. Lett. B 265, 258 (1991).
  • (2) R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 62 (2013).
  • (3) D. E. Kharzeev et al., Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227 (2008).
  • (4) K. Fukushima et al., Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008).
  • (5) V. V. Skovov et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5925 (2009).
  • (6) Roberto Turolla, Silvia Zane, Anna Watts, Rept.Prog.Phys. 78, 116901 (2015).
  • (7) Manisha Kumari and Arvind Kumar, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 31, 2250050 (2022).
  • (8) Debraj Kundu, Vivek Baruah Thapa and Monika Sinha, Phys. Rev. C 107, 035807 (2008).
  • (9) V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy, Nucl. Phys. B 462, 249 (1996),
  • (10) G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and A. Schafer, Phys. Rev. D 86, 071502 (2012).
  • (11) G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, F. Gruber, and A. Schaefer, J. High Energy Phys. 04, 130 (2013).
  • (12) D. E. Kharzeev and D. T. Son, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 062301 (2011).
  • (13) An** Huang et. al., Phys. Rev. C 107, 034901 (2023).
  • (14) S. Gupta, Phys. Lett. B 597, 57 (2004).
  • (15) G. Cocia et al., Nucl. Phys. A 982, 189 (2019).
  • (16) M. A. Andreichikov et al., Phys.Rev. D 87, 094029 (2013).
  • (17) C. S. Machado, S. I. Finazzo, R. D. Matheus, J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074027 (2014).
  • (18) J.P. Carlomagno et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 094035 (2022).
  • (19) Tetsuya Yoshida, Kei Suzuki, Phys. Rev. D 94, 074043 (2016).
  • (20) A. Broderick, M. Prakash, and J. M. Lattimer, Astrophys. J. 537, 351 (2000).
  • (21) A. E. Broderick, M. Prakash, and J. M. Lattimer, Phys. Lett. B 531, 167 (2002).
  • (22) M. Sinha, B. Mukhopadhyay, and A. Sedrakian, Nucl. Phys. A 898, 43 (2013).
  • (23) A. Rabhi, P. K. Panda, and C. Providˆencia, Phys. Rev. C 84, 035803 (2011).
  • (24) D.P. Menezes, M. Benghi Pinto, S. S. Avancini, A. P. Martinez, and C. Providencia, Phys. Rev. C 79, 035807 (2009).
  • (25) Joao Moreira, Pedro Costa and Tulio E. Restrepo, Eur. Phys. J A 57, 123 (2021).
  • (26) Yuan Wang and Xin-Jian Wen, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074034 (2022).
  • (27) P. Yue and H. Shen, Phys. Rev. C 77, 045804 (2008).
  • (28) V. Dexheimer, R. Negreiros, and S. Schramm, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 189 (2012).
  • (29) Manisha Kumari and Arvind Kumar Nucl. Phys. A 1022, 122442 (2022).
  • (30) Nisha Chahal, Suneel Dutt and Arvind Kumar, Phys. Rev. C 107, 045203 (2023).
  • (31) P. C. Chu et al., Phys. Lett. B 778, 447 (2018).
  • (32) D. P. Menezes, M. Benghi Pinto, S. S. Avancini, and C. Providencia, Phys. Rev. C 80, 065805 (2009).
  • (33) A. Haber, F. Preis, and A. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. D 90, 125036 (2014)
  • (34) Arghya Mukherjee, Snigdha Ghosh, Mahatsab Mandal, Sourav Sarkar and Pradip Roy, Phys. Rev. D 98, 056024 (2018).
  • (35) R. M. Aguirre and A. L. De Paoli, Eur. Phys. Jour. A 52, 343 (2016).
  • (36) R. M. Aguirre, Phys. Rev. C 100, 065203 (2019).
  • (37) Danning Li, Mei Huang, Yi Yange and Pei-Hung Yuan, Journal of High Energy Physics 02, 30 (2017).
  • (38) Zhen Fang, Phys. Lett. B 758, 1 (2016).
  • (39) Amruta Mishra and Arindam Mazumdar, Phys. Rev. C 79, 024908 (2009).
  • (40) Arvind Kumar and Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 81, 065204 (2010).
  • (41) P. Papazoglou, D. Zschiesche, S. Schramm, J. Schaffner-Bielich, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 59, 411 (1999).
  • (42) Arvind Kumar and Amruta Mishra, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 164 (2011).
  • (43) D. Pathak and A. Mishra, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 697514 (2015).
  • (44) D. Pathak and A. Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 91, 045206 (2015).
  • (45) D. Pathak and A. Mishra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 23, 1450073 (2014).
  • (46) A. Mishra and D. Pathak, Phys. Rev. C 90, 025201 (2014).
  • (47) P. Sushruth Reddy, C. S. Amal Jahan, Nikhil Dhale, Amruta Mishra and Juergen Schaffner-Bielich, Phys. Rev. C 9, 065208 (2018).
  • (48) N. Dhale, S. Reddy P., A. Jahan C. S., A. Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 98, 015202 (2018).
  • (49) Amal Jahan CS, Nikhil Dhale, Sushruth Reddy P, Shivam Kesarwani, Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 98, 065202 (2018).
  • (50) A. Mishra , A. Jahan CS , S. Kesarwani , H. Raval , S. Kumar, and J. Meena , Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 99 (2019).
  • (51) Amal Jahan C.S., Shivam Kesarwani, Sushruth Reddy P., Nikhil Dhale, and Amruta Mishra, arXiv:1807.07572 (nucl-th).
  • (52) Rajesh Kumar and Arvind Kumar, Phys. Rev. C 101, 015202 (2020).
  • (53) Rajesh Kumar, Rahul Chhabra and Arvind Kumar, Eur. Phys. J A 56, 278 (2020).
  • (54) A. Mishra, P. Parui, A. Kumar, and S. De, arXiv:1811.04622.
  • (55) P. Parui, S. De, A. Kumar, and A. Mishra, arXiv:2104.05471.
  • (56) Amruta Mishra and S. P. Misra, Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. E 30, 2150064 (2021).
  • (57) Amruta Mishra, S.P. Misra, Phys. Rev. C 102, 045204 (2020).
  • (58) Amruta Mishra, S.P. Misra, Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. E 31 06, 2250060 (2022).
  • (59) Pallabi Parui and Amruta Mishra, arXiv:2209.02455.
  • (60) Ankit Kumar and Amruta Mishra, arXiv:2209.02455.
  • (61) Pallabi Parui, Sourodeep De and Amruta Mishra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 31, 2250106 (2022).
  • (62) Amruta Mishra and S.P. Misra, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074003 (2023).
  • (63) Sourodeep De, Pallabi Parui, and Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 107, 065204 (2023).
  • (64) Pallabi Parui and Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114025 (2023).
  • (65) A Le Yaouanc et al, Phys. Lett. B 71, 397 (1977).
  • (66) Bengt Friman, Su Houng Lee and Taesoo Song, Phys. Lett. B 548, 153 (2002).
  • (67) S. P. Misra, Phys. Rev. D 18, 1661 (1978).
  • (68) S. P. Misra, Phys. Rev. D 18, 1673 (1978).
  • (69) Amruta Mishra, S. P. Misra and W. Greiner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 155053 (2015).
  • (70) Amruta Mishra and S. P. Misra, Phy. Rev. C 95, 065206 (2017).
  • (71) S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 166, 1568 (1968).
  • (72) S. Coleman, J. Wess, B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 177, 2239 (1969).
  • (73) W. A. Bardeen and B. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. 177, 2389 (1969).
  • (74) D. Zschiesche, A. Mishra, S. Schramm, H. Stöcker and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 70, 045202 (2004).
  • (75) A. Mishra, K. Balazs, D. Zschiesche, S. Schramm, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 69, 024903 (2004).
  • (76) J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3393 (1980).
  • (77) Erik K. Heide, Serge Rudaz and Paul J. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. A 571, (2001) 713.
  • (78) Amruta Mishra, Phys. Rev. C 91, 035201 (2015).
  • (79) J. F. Nieves, Phys. Rev. D 70, 073001 (2004).
  • (80) A. Mishra and S. Schramm, Phys. Rev. C 74, 064904 (2006), A. Mishra, S. Schramm and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 78, 024901 (2008).
  • (81) Amruta Mishra, Arvind Kumar, Sambuddha Sanyal, S. Schramm, Eur. Phys, J. A 41, 205 (2009).
  • (82) M.E. Peskin, Nucl. Phys. B156, 365 (1979).
  • (83) G. Bhanot and M.E. Peskin, Nucl. Phys. B156, 391 (1979).
  • (84) M.B.Voloshin, Nucl. Phys. B154 ,365 (1979).
  • (85) Su Houng Lee and C.M. Ko, Phys. Rev. C 67, 038202 (2003).
  • (86) S. Cho, K. Hattori, S. H. Lee, K. Morita and S. Ozaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 122301 (2014).
  • (87) S. Cho, K. Hattori, S. H. Lee, K. Morita and S. Ozaki, Phys. Rev. D 91, 045025 (2015).
  • (88) K. Suzuki and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C 96, 035203 (2017).
  • (89) J. Alford and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D 88, 105017 (2013).
  • (90) Amruta Mishra and S. P. Misra, Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. E 30, 2150014 (2021).
  • (91) S. Iwasaki, M. Oka, K. Suzuki, Eur. Phys. Jour. A 57, 222 (2021).
  • (92) L. Micu, Nucl. Phys. B 10, 521 (1969).
  • (93) A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, J. C. Raynal, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2223 (1973); ibid, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1415 (1974); ibid, Phys. Rev. D 11, 1272 (1975).
  • (94) T. Barnes, F. E. Close, P. R. Page and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 55, 4157 (1997).
  • (95) A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson and C. B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2599 (1974).
  • (96) Amruta Mishra, Ankit Kumar and S. P. Misra, Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. E 32, 2350048 (2023).
  • (97) Amruta Mishra and S. P. Misra, Eur. Phys. Jour. A 57, 98 (2021).
  • (98) A. Ilner, D. Cabrera, C. Markert and E. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C 95, 014903 (2017).
  • (99) A. Ilner, J. Blair, D. Cabrera, C. Markert and E. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C 99, 024914 (2019).
  • (100) A. Ilner, D. Cabrera, P. Srisawad and E. Bratkovskaya, Nucl. Phys. A 927, 249 (2014).
  • (101) K. Haglin, Nucl. Phys. A 584, 719 (1995).
  • (102) G. Q. Li, C. M . Ko and G. E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A 611, 539 (1996).