On q-deformed Farey sum and a homological interpretation of q-deformed real quadratic irrational numbers
Abstract
The left and right q-deformed rational numbers were introduced by Bapat, Becker and Licata via regular continued fractions, and they gave a homological interpretation for left and right q-deformed rational numbers. In the present paper, we focus on negative continued fractions and defined left q-deformed negative continued fractions. We give a formula for computing the q-deformed Farey sum of the left q-deformed rational numbers based on it. We use this formula to give a combinatorial proof of the relationship between the left q-deformed rational number and the Jones polynomial of the corresponding rational knot which was proved by Bapat, Becker and Licata using a homological technique. Finally, we combine their work and the q-deformed Farey sum, and give a homological interpretation of the q-deformed Farey sum. We also give an approach to finding a relationship between real quadratic irrational numbers and homological algebra.
keywords: continued fractions, q-deformed Farey sum, Jones polynomial, real quadratic irrational numbers, 2-Calabi–Yau category 000MSC Classification(2020): 11A55, 05A30, 57K14, 18G80
1 Introduction
The notion of -deformed rational numbers [15] was introduced by Morier-Genoud and Ovsienko based on some combinatorial properties of rational numbers. They further extended this notion to arbitrary real numbers [16] by some number-theoretic properties of irrational numbers. These works are related to many directions including Jones polynomial of rational knots [9, 11, 18, 15], Teichmüller spaces [5], the Markov-Hurwitz approximation theory [8, 10, 13, 22], the modular group and the Picard group [12, 21], combinators of posets [14, 19, 20] and triangulated category [2].
For a formal parameter and an irreducible fraction , as an enhancement of -deformed rational numbers, Bapat, Becker and Licata defined left -deformed rational number and right -deformed rational number via the regular continued fractions of , and the right -deformed rational number is exactly -deformed rational number considered by Morier-Genoud and Ovsienko. Following [15] and [2], the right -deformed rational numbers can be expressed by the right -deformed regular or negative continued fraction expansions, and the left -deformed rational numbers can be expressed by the left -deformed regular continued fraction expansions. These -deformations of the fractions are rational expressions in the variable with integer coefficients. Such as [15, 12], and so on, it may be more convenient from the perspective of the negative continued fraction expansion when we consider some properties of left and right -deformed rational numbers and their applications. In particular, the formula for the right -deformed Farey sum based on the negative continued fraction is more concise [15, Section 2]. This induces us to consider the -deformed Farey sum of the left -deformed rational numbers. In the present paper, we define the left -deformed negative continued fraction expansion. Then we give a formula for computing the -deformed Farey sum of the left -deformed rational numbers based on negative continued fraction (see Theorem 3.3).
As an application of the right -deformed rational numbers, given a rational number , we can use the numerator and denominator of to represent the Jones polynomial of the rational knot to which corresponds [15, Proposition A.1]. On the other hand, Bapat, Becker and Licata prove that the Jones polynomial for the rational knot corresponding to can be represented by just the numerator of [2, Theorem A.3] by considering a homological interpretation of and . Considering the zigzag algebra on the quiver, we can obtain a triangulated category called -Calabi–Yau category associated to the quiver [2, Section 4]. For spherical objects on , Bapat, Becker and Licata defined two functions, denoted as and , and they proved that and can be expressed in terms of and , respectively [2, Theorems 3.7 and 3.8]. There are two questions worth considering. Can we give a combinatorial proof of [2, Theorem A.2] without homology techniques? Can we give a homological interpretation of the -deformed irrational numbers defined in [16]? In the present paper, we apply Theorem 3.3 to give a combinatorial proof of [2, Theorem A.3] without using homology techniques (see Theorem 4.2). Then, we combine the homological interpretation of the left and right -deformed rational numbers and the -deformed Farey sum, and give a homological interpretation of the -deformed Farey sum (see Propositions 5.13 and 5.14). We also apply the results in [2, Theorems 4.7 and 4.8] to real quadratic irrational numbers with periodic type (see Theorem 5.15).
This paper is organized into the following sections. In Section 2, we first recall some definitions related to the left and right -deformed rational numbers, including the (right) q-deformed Euler continuants, which were introduced by Morier-Genoud and Ovsienko [15]. Similarly, we define the left -deformed negative continued fractions and left -deformed Euler continuants. We prove that the left -deformed negative continued fractions and the left -deformed regular continued fractions are equal. In Section 3, we give -deformed Farey sum of left -rational numbers based on negative continued fraction, and derive a weighted triangulation and -deformed Farey tessellation corresponding to left -deformed rational numbers. In Section 4, we give a new proof of [2, Theorem A.2] as an application of -deformed Farey sum of left -deformed rational numbers by induction through the length of the negative continued fraction expansion. In Section 5, we first combine the results of [2, Theorems 4.7 and 4.8] with the -deformed Farey sum to give a homological interpretation of the -deformed Farey sum. Then we consider a real quadratic irrational number with periodic type, its -deformation can also be expressed in a special form that is related to the -deformation rational number that approximates it [12]. Based on the results of these -deformations, we give the relations between real quadratic irrational numbers and homological algebra.
2 -deformed continued fractions and -deformed Euler continuants
In this section, we first briefly review some definitions related to left and right -deformed rational numbers (see [2] and [15] for details). We define the left -deformed negative continued fraction expansion and introduce the left -deformed Eulerian continuants. We simply check that the left -deformed negative continued fraction expansion is indeed consistent with the left -deformed regular continued fraction expansion.
2.1 Left and right -integers and -deformed rational numbers
It is well-known that an irreducible fraction has unique regular and negative continued fraction expansions as follows:
with , (), and () and (). If is negative, then and are negative, and if is positive, then and are positive. We denote this expansion by and , respectively. As special cases, the regular and negative continued fraction expansions of and () are , and empty expansion , , respectively.
We consider the following three matrices. We know that the modular group can be generated by or . The modular group acts on by the fractional linear transformation:
where , . Then a rational number can be expressed by the following formulas:
(2.1) |
(2.2) |
Definition 2.1 ([2]).
Let be a formal parameter. For a rational number , we denote by the subgroup of group generated by the following two elements:
Then the right -deformed rational number is
and the left -deformed rational number is
2.2 Left -deformed negative continued fractions
Definition 2.2 ([2]).
Let be a formal parameter. We consider an integer , the following two rational forms and in are called the right -integer of and the left -integer of , respectively.
Remark 2.3.
Suppose that . It can be easy to check that the right -integers and left -integers satisfy the following properties.
-
(i)
;
-
(ii)
,
; -
(iii)
, ;
-
(iv)
, .
Suppose that . From [15] and [2], the right -deformed rational number has both the following -deformed positive and negative continued fraction expansions.
(2.3) |
(2.4) |
For the left -deformed rational number , Bapat,Becker and Licata proved that the right -deformed rational number has a -deformed positive continued fraction expansion [2] as follows:
(2.5) |
Similarly to the formula (2.4), we can also define the left -deformed negative continued fraction expansion as follows:
Definition 2.4 (left -deformation of negative continued fraction expansion).
(2.6) |
Note that it differs from the right -deformed negative continuous fraction expansion only in the last term.
As in the case of right -deformation, we have the following conclusion for the case of left -deformation.
Theorem 2.5.
If a rational number is given in the form , then
(2.7) |
We will prove this formula in Section 2.4.
2.3 The left and right -deformed Euler continuants
Definition 2.6 (right q-deformed Euler continuants).
(2.8) |
where ’s are integers, and for convenience, we set and .
For the numerators and denominators of the right -deformed rational numbers, we have the following conclusion.
Proposition 2.7 ([15, Proposition 5.3]).
For a rational number , we have
Definition 2.8 (left q-deformed Euler continuants).
(2.9) |
where ’s are integers, and for convenience, we set and .
By the definition of , we know that for , we have
For a non-negative integer , by induction, it can be checked that
(2.10) |
Moreover, by the definition of and , we can know that
(2.11) |
2.4 Proof of Theorem 2.5
Before we prove Theorem 2.5, let us prove the following proposition.
Proposition 2.9.
Consider the element in , then
(2.12) |
Proof..
Through the above arguments, we have
2.5 Basic properties of the numerator and denominator of left -rational numbers
Morier-Genoud and Ovsienko give the basic properties of the numerator and denominator of right -deformed rationals as follows [15]:
For , we have
where the initial data
then it follows that
Similarly, we have the corresponding property for the left -rationals as follows. For , we have
where the initial data
then it follows that
3 -deformed Farey sum and -deformed Farey triangles
In this section, we give formulas corresponding to the -deformed Farey sum of the left -deformed rational numbers. We use this formula to obtain a -deformed Farey tessellation and weighted triangulation on the left -deformed rational numbers. For convenience, from this section onwards, we always assume that the rational numbers are non-negative. The case of negative rational numbers can be considered by symmetry.
3.1 -deformed Farey sum of left and right -rational numbers
We consider two non-negative irreducible fractions and (we always asumme that is an irreducible fraction), then we say , are Farey neighbors if . Different from the ordinary sum of fractions, we denote the Farey sum of and by
(3.1) |
The -deformed Farey sum of right -deformed rational numbers has been introduced in [15].
Theorem 3.1 (Morier-Genoud and Ovsienko [15]).
For a positive rational number which is the Farey sum of
(3.2) |
and
(3.3) |
if we assume that
then
(3.4) |
Hence, we define the -defomed Farey sum of and by
Example 3.2.
, , , then
Similarly, we consider a left -deformed rational number for a left -deformed Farey sum. The following theorem gives the formula for the -deformed Farey sum of a left -deformed rational number. It is interesting to note that formula (3.5) forms a formal symmetry with the formula (3.4).
Theorem 3.3.
For a rational number which is the Farey sum of and defined by (3.2) and (3.3), if we assume that
then
(3.5) |
where .
In particular, for , we have
Hence, we define the -defomed Farey sum of and by
3.2 -deformed Farey tessellation about left -deformed rational numbers
In this section, following [15, 2], we discuss a relationship between left -deformed rational numbers and Farey tessellation (see [6] for more details). We assume that all rational numbers are represented as irreducible fractions. We order the elements of by horizontal segment drawn in the plane, then Farey tessellation consists of all triangles whoose forms are as in the left of Figure 1 (a rational number which is the Farey sum of and defined by (3.2) and (3.3)), and each vertex corresponds to a rational number, and any two vertices that are Farey neighbors are connected by a semicircle. We call these triangles Farey triangles, and the initial Farey triangle is on the right of Figure 1.
The -deformed Farey tessellation considered in [15] and [2] is composed of -deformed Farey triangles which are obtained by basing on the original Farey triangle and each vertex is a right -deformed rational number and each edge is weighted. Every -deformed Farey triangle can be obtained according to the laws of Theorem 3.1. Now we replace Theorem 3.1 with Theorem 3.3, and setting the initial -deformed Farey triangle as the left of Figure 2, then we can obtain a new Farey tessellation consisting of -deformed Farey triangles as in the right of Figure 2. Each vertex of a -deformed Farey triangle corresponds to a left -deformed rational number (as a simple example, see Figure 3).
Following [2, Section 2.2], we choose two infinitely close Farey triangle sequences from the left and right sides near the rational number . Considering the Farey tessellation according to the laws of Theorem 3.3, then we find that the Farey triangle sequence on the left side of converges to exactly one point. However, when is not equal to , the one on the right side of cannot converge to a point. Thus we obtain a figure with mirror symmetry to [2, Figure 5].
3.3 Weighted triangulation about left -deformed rational numbers
Consider a positive rational number which is the Farey sum of and defined by (3.2) and (3.3). According to [17], it follows that corresponds to a triangulation as in Figure 4. If we give the initial values as in Figure 5, then the remaining vertices can be computed according to the Farey sum.
Example 3.5.
The triangulations of and can be expressed as Figure 6.
Now, let us consider the -deformation of the triangulation which is called weighted triangulation. For the vertices and edges of the two kinds of triangles in the triangulation, we will set them with the -deformed Farey sum from Theorem 3.1 in Figure 7, and the initial setting is as Figure 8 (See [15] for details).
Similary, for the vertices and edges of the two kinds of triangles in the triangulation, we will set them with the -deformed Farey sum from Theorem 3.3 in Figure 9, and the initial setting is as Figure 10. Different from the above case, the weights of the edges with endpoints and become , and the weights of the edges with endpoints and become some power of , which is symmetric to the case of the right -deformed rational numbers. This phenomenon also corresponding to the fact that for the -deformed Farey sum, there is a symmetric between the case of the right -deformed rational numbers and the case of the left -deformed rational numbers.
Example 3.6.
4 Jones polynomial and left -rational numbers
Following [11, Proposition 1.2 (b)], [15, Proposition A.1] and [2, Theorem A.3], we can obtain the relationship between left and right -deformed rational numbers and Jones polynomials. In this section, we give a new proof of Theorem A.3 in [2] without the homological argument.
For a rational number , following [2], we suppose that is the Jones polynomial associated with the rational knot parametrized by , and denote the polynomial obtained by making each coefficient positive. Following [15], let be the normalized Jones polynomial associated with the rational knot parametrized by . The next lemma can be checked by [15, Proposition A.1] and Theorem 3.1.
Lemma 4.1.
Following [2], the sequence of coefficients of the normalized Jones polynomial is just the reverse of the sequence of coefficients of the Jones polynomial , then the equation
will be proved by showing the next theorem.
Theorem 4.2.
For a rational , the normalized Jones polynomial of satisfies the following formula:
where .
Proof..
For the rational , it is easy to check the case of and . We consider the following induction hypothesis:
(4.1) |
We prove that
where .
For the case of , we have
where
Suppose that
then by the induction hypothesis (4.1), Lemma 4.1 and Theorem 3.3, it follows that
where
Now we assume for some . We set the following induction hypothesis:
(4.2) |
where
Example 4.3.
5 Relationship to -Calabi–Yau category associated to the quiver
A relation between -deformed rational numbers and homology algebra is given in [2]. In this section, we first briefly recall the relevant definitions and conclusions. We derive a homological interpretation of -Farey sum of -deformed rational numbers by combining Theorems 3.7 and 3.8 in [2] with Theorems 3.1 and 3.3 in Section 3. In addition, we consider any continued fraction expansion of a real quadratic irrational number of purely cyclic type and give its homological interpretation.
A relation between -deformed rational numbers and homology algebra is given in [2]. In this chapter, we briefly recall the relevant definitions and conclusions (c.f. [1, 2, 4, 3, 23] for more details in this chapter).
5.1 -Calabi–Yau category associated to the quiver and spherical objects
We fix a field which is algebraic closed and . Consider the double of quiver as
where and are vertices.
Definition 5.1 (Zigzag algebra of ).
The zigzag algebra of is the quotient of the path algebra by the two-sided ideal generated by all length three paths.
We regard as a differential graded algebra by assuming that the grading is the path length and the differential is zero. We denote the homotopy category of differential graded modules over by , and denote by the derived category of differential graded modules over (by inverting quasi-isomorphisms in the ). Note that is not the derived category of complexes of graded -module as an ordinary algebra (c.f. [23, Section 4]). For , we denote the differential graded module by , where is the trivial path. By an ambusing notion, we will denote as an object of .
Definition 5.2.
Let be the full triangulated subcategory of which is the extension closure of
Theorem 5.3 ([1, 2, 4, 3, 23]).
For the , we have the following facts.
-
is a finite type linear triangulated category;
-
is a -Calabi–Yau category;
-
and are spherical objects in the finite type , that is for and any integer , one has
There is a unique morphism , and also , and we denote the cones of and by and , respectively. We note that , , and are indecomposable spherical objects of .
The extension closure of and is a heart of a bounded -structure of (c.f. [7, Section 10.1], for associated definitions). We call this heart is a standard heart, and denote it by . Note that and are simple objects in , and is a module category of the preprojective algebra of type . We have a exact sequence
5.2 Spherical twist functors on
Definition 5.4 (Spherical twist functors on [23]).
Let is a spherical object in . The spherical twist functor along is an autoequivalence on as follows.
where is a complex which for the -th term is defined by
We also have a inverse of which is defined as
Let be the set of spherical objects of .
Proposition 5.5 (Braid relation [23]).
The group of spherical twist functor which generated by , is isomorphic to . Moreover for any and for any spherical twist functors on , one has .
Henceforth, without causing confusion, we simply denote and as and , respectively.
For an irredicuible fraction , let the spherical object corresponding to be
(5.1) |
By Proposition 5.5, belongs to .
5.3 Bridgeland stability conditions
Definition 5.6 ([1]).
A stability condition on a triangulated category is specified by two compatible structures , where is a slicing which consists of ablian subcategories of for each real number , and is called the central charge which is a homomorphism of additive groups from the Grothendieck group to the complex numbers
The slicing and the central charge satisfy the following conditions:
-
(i)
;
-
(ii)
For , if , , then ;
-
(iii)
For any nonzero object in , there is a Harder–Narasimhan (HN) filtration of , where each triangle in Figure 15 is exact and each for ;
Figure 15: The Harder–Narasimhan filtrations of X -
(iv)
For any , there is some positive real number such that
Definition 5.7 ([2]).
A stability condition on is standard if there is a positive real number , such that . More specifically, is formed by and on the spot.
A standard stability condition gives rise to a special filtration of (see Figure 16),
where each subquotient (called -HN-factor) is isomorphic to (, , ).
5.4 Two kinds of functional and
Fix a standard stability condition , let denote the set of all objects of whose -Harder-Narasimhan filtration factors are shifts of either or where and . By [2, Proposition 4.3], each spherical object must belong to one of , , , . Since we only consider the case , then by [2, Figure 6 in Section 4.3], it must have .
Definition 5.8 (Counting functional).
The counting functional of -HN-factors is defined by an element of the Laurent polynomial ring as follows.
where and is the number of -HN-factors which are isomorphic to .
Definition 5.9 ([2, and ]).
For any , there are two kinds of functionals denoted by and , respectively, which are defined as follows.
Then we have the next theorem which gives a relationship between the -deformed rational numbers and homological algebra.
Theorem 5.10 (Bapat, Becker and Licata [2, A part of Theorems 4.7 and 4.8]).
Consider a non-negative rational number . Suppose that
then we have
and
5.5 A homological interpretation of the -deformed Farey sum
Consider a positive rational number . Since Theorems 3.1 and 3.3 are based on , we first make a simple formal transformation of (5.1). By direct computation, in Section 2 is represented by in , and then we have
in . Thus, we also have
in . Hence, we have
(5.2) |
If is the Farey sum of and defined by (3.2) and (3.3), then by appling the above transformation to and , it follows that
(5.3) |
and
(5.4) |
Note that and are not the numerator and denominator of the right -deformed rational number, respectively. In fact, they differ by some power of (c.f. [2, The proof of Theorems 4.7 and 4.8]). Hence, we first determine the power of as follows.
Theorem 5.11.
For the right -deformed rational number , we have
Proof..
For a polynomial , let One has We consider the -HN-factor of , and let
Then by the definition of , we have . It can be checked that for
by direct computation. For (5.2), repete the above computation, we have Hence we have
∎
Similarly, we note that and are not the numerator and denominator of the right -deformed rational number, respectively. However, we have
Theorem 5.12.
For the left -deformed rational number , we have
Proof..
For a rational number which is the Farey sum of and defined by (3.2) and (3.3), if we consider the spherical objects corresponding , , , then by Theorems 3.1 and 3.3, we have the following facts.
Proposition 5.13.
Considering the spherical objects , and in , for , we have the following formula.
-
If , then
-
If i.e. , and , then
-
If where , then
-
If i.e. and , then
By Corollary 5.13, we can botain a formual Farey sum of the sphercial objects in .
Proposition 5.14.
Considering the spherical objects , and in , for , we have the following formula.
-
If , then
-
If i.e. , and , then
-
If where , then
-
If i.e. and , then
5.6 Real quadratic irrationals with periodic type
Let be a real quadratic irrational number. Since can be written as where , , , then we have the following conclusions which give a homological interpretation of .
Theorem 5.15.
Proof..
Remark 5.16.
For (2) of the above Theorem, if we take , then we have
hence, we get the case of the golden number as follows.
(5.8) |
Acknowledgments
I am greatly indebted to Professor Asilata Bapat for many useful discussions. I also grateful to Professor Akishi Ikeda for providing a notes about Stability conditions on triangulated categories, which helped me learn some basic concepts about it. I am greatly indebted to Professor Michihisa Wakui for many useful disscussions and for the guidance. I thank Professors Takeyoshi Kogiso and Kengo Miyamoto for giving me the opportunity to start this work.
References
- [1] Bridgeland, T.: Stability conditions on triangulated categories, Ann. of Math. (2) 166 (2007), no. 2, 317–345.
- [2] Bapat, A., Becker, L., Licata, A. M.: -deformed rational numbers and the -Calabi–Yau category of type , Forum Math. Sigma11(2023), Paper No. e47, 41 pp.
- [3] Bapat, A., Deopurkar, A., L., Licata, A. M.: Spherical objects and stability conditions on 2-Calabi–Yau quiver categories, Mathematische Zeitschrift (2023) 303:13.
- [4] Bapat, A., Deopurkar, A., L., Licata, A. M.: A Thurston compactification of the space of stability conditions, arXiv:2011.07908, 2022.
- [5] Fok, V. V.; Chekhov, L. O.: Quantum Teichmüller spaces, Theoret. and Math. Phys. 120 (1999), 1245–1259.
- [6] Hardy, G. H., and Wright, E. M.: An introduction to the theory of numbers, Sixth edition. Revised by D. R. Heath-Brown and J. H. Silverman. With a foreword by Andrew Wiles. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008. xxii+621 pp.
- [7] Kashiwara, M., Schapira, P.: Sheaves on Manifolds, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 292. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1990).
- [8] Kogiso, T.: -deformations and -deformations of Markov triples, arXiv:2008.12913, 2022.
- [9] Kogiso, T., Wakui, M.: A bridge between Conway-Coxeter friezes and rational tangles through the Kauffman bracket polynomials, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 28 (2019), no. 14, 1950083, 40 pp.
- [10] Labbé, S., and Lapointe, M.: The -analog of the Markoff injectivity conjecture over the language of a balanced sequence, Comb. Theory 2 (2022), no. 1, Paper No. 9, 25 pp.
- [11] Lee, K., Schiffler, R.: Cluster algebras and Jones polynomials, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 25 (2019), no. 4, Paper No. 58, 41 pp.
- [12] Leclere, L., Morier-Genoud, S.: The -deformations in the modular group and of the real quadratic irrational numbers, Adv. in Appl. Math. 130 (2021), Paper No. 102223, 28 pp.
- [13] Leclere, L., Morier-Genoud, S., Ovsienko, V., Veselov, A.: On radius of convergence of -deformed real numbers, Mosc. Math. J.24(2024), no.1, 1–19.
- [14] McConville, T., Sagan, B. E., and Smyth, C. On a rank-unimodality conjecture of Morier-Genoud and Ovsienko, Discrete Math. 344 (2021), no. 8, Paper No. 112483, 13 pp.
- [15] Morier-Genoud, S., Ovsienko, V.: -deformed rationals and -continued fractions, Forum Math. Sigma 8 (2020), Paper No. e13, 55 pp.
- [16] Morier-Genoud, S., Ovsienko, V.: On -deformed real numbers, Exp. Math. 31 (2022), no. 2, 652–660.
- [17] Morier-Genoud, S., Ovsienko, V.: Farey boat: continued fractions and triangulations, modular group and polygon dissections, Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver. 121 (2019), no. 2, 91–136.
- [18] Nagai, W., Terashima, Y.: Cluster variables, ancestral triangles and Alexander polynomials, Adv. Math. 363 (2020), 106965, 37 pp.
- [19] Oguz, E. K.: Oriented posets and rank matrices, arXiv:2206.05517, 2022.
- [20] Oguz, E. K., Ravichandran, M.: Rank polynomials of fence posets are unimodal, Discrete Math.346(2023), no.2, Paper No. 113218, 20 pp.
- [21] Ovsienko, V.: Towards quantized complex numbers: -deformed gaussian integers and the Picard group, Open Communications in Nonlinear Mathematical Physics Vol.1 (2021) pp 73–93.
- [22] Ren, X.: On radiuses of convergence of -metallic numbers and related -rational numbers, Res. Number Theory 8 (2022), no. 3, Paper No. 37, 14 pp.
- [23] Seidel, P., Thomas.R.: Braid group actions on derived categories of coherent sheaves, Duke Math. J. 108 (2001), no. 1, 37–108.
Xin Ren: Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka Osaka, 560-0043, Japan.
E-mail address: (1) [email protected]; (2) [email protected].