Statistics > Methodology
[Submitted on 4 Jun 2024]
Title:How should parallel cluster randomized trials with a baseline period be analyzed? A survey of estimands and common estimators
View PDFAbstract:The parallel cluster randomized trial with baseline (PB-CRT) is a common variant of the standard parallel cluster randomized trial (P-CRT) that maintains parallel randomization but additionally allows for both within and between-cluster comparisons. We define two estimands of interest in the context of PB-CRTs, the participant-average treatment effect (pATE) and cluster-average treatment effect (cATE), to address participant and cluster-level hypotheses. Previous work has indicated that under informative cluster sizes, commonly used mixed-effects models may yield inconsistent estimators for the estimands of interest. In this work, we theoretically derive the convergence of the unweighted and inverse cluster-period size weighted (i.) independence estimating equation, (ii.) fixed-effects model, (iii.) exchangeable mixed-effects model, and (iv.) nested-exchangeable mixed-effects model treatment effect estimators in a PB-CRT with continuous outcomes. We report a simulation study to evaluate the bias and inference with these different treatment effect estimators and their corresponding model-based or jackknife variance estimators. We then re-analyze a PB-CRT examining the effects of community youth teams on improving mental health among adolescent girls in rural eastern India. We demonstrate that the unweighted and weighted independence estimating equation and fixed-effects model regularly yield consistent estimators for the pATE and cATE estimands, whereas the mixed-effects models yield inconsistent estimators under informative cluster sizes. However, we demonstrate that unlike the nested-exchangeable mixed-effects model and corresponding analyses in P-CRTs, the exchangeable mixed-effects model is surprisingly robust to bias in many PB-CRT scenarios.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.