Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 10 Feb 2023]
Title:Constraints on dark energy from the CSST galaxy clusters
View PDFAbstract:We study the potential of the galaxy cluster sample expected from the China Space Station Telescope (CSST) survey to constrain dark energy properties. By modelling the distribution of observed cluster mass for a given true mass to be log-normal and adopting a selection threshold in the observed mass $M_{200m} \geq 0.836 \times 10^{14} h^{-1}M_{\odot}$, we find about $4.1 \times 10^{5}$ clusters in the redshift range $0 \leq z \leq 1.5$ can be detected by the CSST. We construct the Fisher matrix for the cluster number counts from CSST, and forecast constraints on dark energy parameters for models with constant ($w_0$CDM) and time dependent ($w_0w_a$CDM) equation of state. In the self-calibration scheme, the dark energy equation of state parameter $w_0$ of $w_0$CDM model can be constrained to $\Delta w_0 = 0.036$. If $w_a$ is added as a free parameter, we obtain $\Delta w_0 = 0.077$ and $\Delta w_a = 0.39$ for the $w_0w_a$CDM model, with a Figure of Merit for ($w_0,w_a$) to be 68.99. Should we had perfect knowledge of the observable-mass scaling relation (``known SR" scheme), we would obtain $\Delta w_0 = 0.012$ for $w_0$CDM model, $\Delta w_0 = 0.062$ and $\Delta w_a = 0.24$ for $w_0w_a$CDM model. The dark energy Figure of Merit of ($w_0,w_a$) increases to 343.25. By extending the maximum redshift of the clusters from $z_{max} \sim 1.5$ to $z_{max} \sim 2$, the dark energy Figure of Merit for ($w_0,w_a$) increases to 89.72 (self-calibration scheme) and 610.97 (``known SR" scheme), improved by a factor of $\sim 1.30$ and $\sim 1.78$, respectively. We find that the impact of clusters' redshift uncertainty on the dark energy constraints is negligible as long as the redshift error of clusters is smaller than 0.01, achievable by CSST. We also find that the bias in logarithm mass must be calibrated to be $0.30$ or better to avoid significant dark energy parameter bias.
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.