Physics > Applied Physics
[Submitted on 21 Aug 2018 (this version), latest version 3 Dec 2018 (v2)]
Title:Comparison of bonding-induced misalignment errors in InP-on-Si wafers determined by e-beam metrology: direct vs. adhesive bonding
View PDFAbstract:We investigate the multilayer exposure misalignment (overlay) errors induced in heterogeneously bonded III-V material on silicon. By using an electron beam writer as metrology tool we obtained overlay distortion maps by detecting positions of alignment marks in an array defined on 250 nm InP layer bonded to a 2" silicon substrate. Significant pattern distortion exceeding the assessed 3{\sigma} standard deviation of 15 nm appeared when repeating measurements on a 2" Si wafer after changing its orientation in the e-beam cassette slot. This did not happen for a 4" Si wafer, which had identically-sized pattern exposed in its centre. For the bonded wafers, the smallest degree of linearly-corrected overlay errors, limited by the distortion close to the cassette slot edge, was obtained for the directly bonded wafer, with the alignment marks both formed and measured in the InP layer after bonding (equivalent to single-sided processing of the bonded layer). Large InP layer deformations exceeding 1 {\mu}m were observed for the wafer bonded using thick adhesive BCB polymer, with the alignment marks formed in the InP wafer before bonding and subsequent measurement (equivalent to double-sided processing). InP layer deformation was reduced by processing the directly bonded wafer in a double-sided manner. These results indicate considerable limitations of the double-sided processing approach for device fabrication requiring precise alignment to pre-defined structures, especially when using thick adhesive BCB bonding. On the other hand, superiority of the single-sided processing approach is demonstrated for the directly bonded wafers, where high alignment precision is achievable even after prolonged high-temperature exposure during fabrication. The findings of this paper can hopefully provide insight in optimizing the fabrication for efficient and high-performance on-chip photonic integrated devices.
Submission history
From: Aurimas Sakanas [view email][v1] Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:23:09 UTC (1,608 KB)
[v2] Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:44:27 UTC (829 KB)
Current browse context:
physics.app-ph
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.