Showing 1–1 of 1 results for author: van der Zanden, T

Constructing Bayesian Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Experiments by Simulated Annealing

Authors: Yicheng Mao, Roselinde Kessels, Tom van der Zanden

Abstract: Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) investigate the attributes that influence individuals' choices when selecting among various options. To enhance the quality of the estimated choice models, researchers opt for Bayesian optimal designs that utilize existing information about the attributes' preferences. Given the nonlinear nature of choice models, the construction of an appropriate design requires… ▽ More Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) investigate the attributes that influence individuals' choices when selecting among various options. To enhance the quality of the estimated choice models, researchers opt for Bayesian optimal designs that utilize existing information about the attributes' preferences. Given the nonlinear nature of choice models, the construction of an appropriate design requires efficient algorithms. Among these, the Coordinate-Exchange (CE) algorithm is most commonly employed for constructing designs based on the multinomial logit model. Since this is a hill-climbing algorithm, obtaining better designs necessitates multiple random starting designs. This approach increases the algorithm's run-time, but may not lead to a significant improvement in results. We propose the use of a Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithm to construct Bayesian D-optimal designs. This algorithm accepts both superior and inferior solutions, avoiding premature convergence and allowing a more thorough exploration of potential designs. Consequently, it ultimately obtains higher-quality choice designs within the same time-frame. Our work represents the first application of an SA algorithm in constructing Bayesian optimal designs for DCEs. Through computational experiments and a real-life case study, we demonstrate that the SA designs consistently outperform the CE designs in terms of Bayesian D-efficiency, especially when the prior preference information is highly uncertain. △ Less

Submitted 28 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.