From scenario-based seismic hazard to scenario-based landslide hazard: rewinding to the past via statistical simulations
Authors:
Luguang Luo,
Luigi Lombardo,
Cees van Westen,
Xiangjun Pei,
Runqiu Huang
Abstract:
The vast majority of landslide susceptibility studies assumes the slope instability process to be time-invariant under the definition that "the past and present are keys to the future". This assumption may generally be valid. However, the trigger, be it a rainfall or an earthquake event, clearly varies over time. And yet, the temporal component of the trigger is rarely included in landslide suscep…
▽ More
The vast majority of landslide susceptibility studies assumes the slope instability process to be time-invariant under the definition that "the past and present are keys to the future". This assumption may generally be valid. However, the trigger, be it a rainfall or an earthquake event, clearly varies over time. And yet, the temporal component of the trigger is rarely included in landslide susceptibility studies and only confined to hazard assessment. In this work, we investigate a population of landslides triggered in response to the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake ($M_w = 6.5$) including the associated ground motion in the analyses, these being carried out at the Slope Unit (SU) level. We do this by implementing a Bayesian version of a Generalized Additive Model and assuming that the slope instability across the SUs in the study area behaves according to a Bernoulli probability distribution. This procedure would generally produce a susceptibility map reflecting the spatial pattern of the specific trigger and therefore of limited use for land use planning. However, we implement this first analytical step to reliably estimate the ground motion effect, and its distribution, on unstable SUs. We then assume the effect of the ground motion to be time-invariant, enabling statistical simulations for any ground motion scenario that occurred in the area from 1933 to 2017. As a result, we obtain the full spectrum of potential susceptibility patterns over the last century and compress this information into a susceptibility model/map representative of all the possible ground motion patterns since 1933. This backward statistical simulations can also be further exploited in the opposite direction where, by accounting for scenario-based ground motion, one can also use it in a forward direction to estimate future unstable slopes.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
Geostatistical modeling to capture seismic-shaking patterns from earthquake-induced landslides
Authors:
Luigi Lombardo,
Haakon Bakka,
Hakan Tanyas,
Cees van Westen,
P. Martin Mai,
Raphael Huser
Abstract:
In this paper, we investigate earthquake-induced landslides using a geostatistical model that includes a latent spatial effect (LSE). The LSE represents the spatially structured residuals in the data, which are complementary to the information carried by the covariates. To determine whether the LSE can capture the residual signal from a given trigger, we test whether the LSE is able to capture the…
▽ More
In this paper, we investigate earthquake-induced landslides using a geostatistical model that includes a latent spatial effect (LSE). The LSE represents the spatially structured residuals in the data, which are complementary to the information carried by the covariates. To determine whether the LSE can capture the residual signal from a given trigger, we test whether the LSE is able to capture the pattern of seismic shaking caused by an earthquake from the distribution of seismically induced landslides, without prior knowledge of the earthquake being included in the statistical model. We assess the landslide intensity, i.e., the expected number of landslide activations per map** unit, for the area in which landslides triggered by the Wenchuan (M 7.9, May 12, 2008) and Lushan (M 6.6, April 20, 2013) earthquakes overlap. We chose an area of overlap** landslides in order to test our method on landslide inventories located in the near and far fields of the earthquake. We generated three different models for each earthquake-induced landslide scenario: i) seismic parameters only (as a proxy for the trigger); ii) the LSE only; and iii) both seismic parameters and the LSE. The three configurations share the same set of morphometric covariates. This allowed us to study the pattern in the LSE and assess whether it adequately approximated the effects of seismic wave propagation. Moreover, it allowed us to check whether the LSE captured effects that are not explained by the shaking levels, such as topographic amplification. Our results show that the LSE reproduced the shaking patterns in space for both earthquakes with a level of spatial detail even greater than the seismic parameters. In addition, the models including the LSE perform better than conventional models featuring seismic parameters only.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
