A Horseshoe mixture model for Bayesian screening with an application to light sheet fluorescence microscopy in brain imaging
Authors:
Francesco Denti,
Ricardo Azevedo,
Chelsie Lo,
Damian Wheeler,
Sunil P. Gandhi,
Michele Guindani,
Babak Shahbaba
Abstract:
In this paper, we focus on identifying differentially activated brain regions using a light sheet fluorescence microscopy - a recently developed technique for whole-brain imaging. Most existing statistical methods solve this problem by partitioning the brain regions into two classes: significantly and non-significantly activated. However, for the brain imaging problem at the center of our study, s…
▽ More
In this paper, we focus on identifying differentially activated brain regions using a light sheet fluorescence microscopy - a recently developed technique for whole-brain imaging. Most existing statistical methods solve this problem by partitioning the brain regions into two classes: significantly and non-significantly activated. However, for the brain imaging problem at the center of our study, such binary grou** may provide overly simplistic discoveries by filtering out weak but important signals, that are typically adulterated by the noise present in the data. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a new Bayesian approach that allows classifying the brain regions into several tiers with varying degrees of relevance. Our approach is based on a combination of shrinkage priors - widely used in regression and multiple hypothesis testing problems - and mixture models - commonly used in model-based clustering. In contrast to the existing regularizing prior distributions, which use either the spike-and-slab prior or continuous scale mixtures, our class of priors is based on a discrete mixture of continuous scale mixtures and devises a cluster-shrinkage version of the Horseshoe prior. As a result, our approach provides a more general setting for Bayesian sparse estimation, drastically reduces the number of shrinkage parameters needed, and creates a framework for sharing information across units of interest. We show that this approach leads to more biologically meaningful and interpretable results in our brain imaging problem, since it allows the discrimination between active and inactive regions, while at the same time ranking the discoveries into clusters representing tiers of similar importance.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2023; v1 submitted 15 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
Addressing Spatially Structured Interference in Causal Analysis Using Propensity Scores
Authors:
Keith W. Zirkle,
Marie-Abele Bind,
Jenise L. Swall,
David C. Wheeler
Abstract:
Environmental epidemiologists are increasingly interested in establishing causality between exposures and health outcomes. A popular model for causal inference is the Rubin Causal Model (RCM), which typically seeks to estimate the average difference in study units' potential outcomes. An important assumption under RCM is no interference; that is, the potential outcomes of one unit are not affected…
▽ More
Environmental epidemiologists are increasingly interested in establishing causality between exposures and health outcomes. A popular model for causal inference is the Rubin Causal Model (RCM), which typically seeks to estimate the average difference in study units' potential outcomes. An important assumption under RCM is no interference; that is, the potential outcomes of one unit are not affected by the exposure status of other units. The no interference assumption is violated if we expect spillover or diffusion of exposure effects based on units' proximity to other units and several other causal estimands arise. Air pollution epidemiology typically violates this assumption when we expect upwind events to affect downwind or nearby locations. This paper adapts causal assumptions from social network research to address interference and allow estimation of both direct and spillover causal effects. We use propensity score-based methods to estimate these effects when considering the effects of the Environmental Protection Agency's 2005 nonattainment designations for particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 micrograms per cubic meter (PM2.5) on lung cancer incidence using county-level data obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. We compare these methods in a rigorous simulation study that considers both spatially autocorrelated variables, interference, and missing confounders. We find that pruning and matching based on the propensity score produces the highest probability coverage of the true causal effects and lower mean squared error. When applied to the research question, we found protective direct and spillover causal effects.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
