Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Weinstein, B

Negative Control Falsification Tests for Instrumental Variable Designs

Authors: Oren Danieli, Daniel Nevo, Itai Walk, Bar Weinstein, Dan Zeltzer

Abstract: We develop theoretical foundations for widely used falsification tests for instrumental variable (IV) designs. We characterize these tests as conditional independence tests between negative control variables - proxies for potential threats - and either the IV or the outcome. We find that conventional applications of these falsification tests would flag problems in exogenous IV designs, and propose… ▽ More We develop theoretical foundations for widely used falsification tests for instrumental variable (IV) designs. We characterize these tests as conditional independence tests between negative control variables - proxies for potential threats - and either the IV or the outcome. We find that conventional applications of these falsification tests would flag problems in exogenous IV designs, and propose simple solutions to avoid this. We also propose new falsification tests that incorporate new types of negative control variables or alternative statistical tests. Finally, we illustrate that under stronger assumptions, negative control variables can also be used for bias correction. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2024; v1 submitted 25 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Causal inference with misspecified network interference structure

Authors: Bar Weinstein, Daniel Nevo

Abstract: Under interference, the potential outcomes of a unit depend on treatments assigned to other units. A network interference structure is typically assumed to be given and accurate. In this paper, we study the problems resulting from misspecifying these networks. First, we derive bounds on the bias arising from estimating causal effects under a misspecified network. We show that the maximal possible… ▽ More Under interference, the potential outcomes of a unit depend on treatments assigned to other units. A network interference structure is typically assumed to be given and accurate. In this paper, we study the problems resulting from misspecifying these networks. First, we derive bounds on the bias arising from estimating causal effects under a misspecified network. We show that the maximal possible bias depends on the divergence between the assumed network and the true one with respect to the induced exposure probabilities. Then, we propose a novel estimator that leverages multiple networks simultaneously and is unbiased if one of the networks is correct, thus providing robustness to network specification. Additionally, we develop a probabilistic bias analysis that quantifies the impact of a postulated misspecification mechanism on the causal estimates. We illustrate key issues in simulations and demonstrate the utility of the proposed methods in a social network field experiment and a cluster-randomized trial with suspected cross-clusters contamination. △ Less

Submitted 6 March, 2024; v1 submitted 22 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Margin-Based Regularization and Selective Sampling in Deep Neural Networks

Authors: Berry Weinstein, Shai Fine, Yacov Hel-Or

Abstract: We derive a new margin-based regularization formulation, termed multi-margin regularization (MMR), for deep neural networks (DNNs). The MMR is inspired by principles that were applied in margin analysis of shallow linear classifiers, e.g., support vector machine (SVM). Unlike SVM, MMR is continuously scaled by the radius of the bounding sphere (i.e., the maximal norm of the feature vector in the d… ▽ More We derive a new margin-based regularization formulation, termed multi-margin regularization (MMR), for deep neural networks (DNNs). The MMR is inspired by principles that were applied in margin analysis of shallow linear classifiers, e.g., support vector machine (SVM). Unlike SVM, MMR is continuously scaled by the radius of the bounding sphere (i.e., the maximal norm of the feature vector in the data), which is constantly changing during training. We empirically demonstrate that by a simple supplement to the loss function, our method achieves better results on various classification tasks across domains. Using the same concept, we also derive a selective sampling scheme and demonstrate accelerated training of DNNs by selecting samples according to a minimal margin score (MMS). This score measures the minimal amount of displacement an input should undergo until its predicted classification is switched. We evaluate our proposed methods on three image classification tasks and six language text classification tasks. Specifically, we show improved empirical results on CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and ImageNet using state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and BERT-BASE architecture for the MNLI, QQP, QNLI, MRPC, SST-2 and RTE benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Selective sampling for accelerating training of deep neural networks

Authors: Berry Weinstein, Shai Fine, Yacov Hel-Or

Abstract: We present a selective sampling method designed to accelerate the training of deep neural networks. To this end, we introduce a novel measurement, the minimal margin score (MMS), which measures the minimal amount of displacement an input should take until its predicted classification is switched. For multi-class linear classification, the MMS measure is a natural generalization of the margin-based… ▽ More We present a selective sampling method designed to accelerate the training of deep neural networks. To this end, we introduce a novel measurement, the minimal margin score (MMS), which measures the minimal amount of displacement an input should take until its predicted classification is switched. For multi-class linear classification, the MMS measure is a natural generalization of the margin-based selection criterion, which was thoroughly studied in the binary classification setting. In addition, the MMS measure provides an interesting insight into the progress of the training process and can be useful for designing and monitoring new training regimes. Empirically we demonstrate a substantial acceleration when training commonly used deep neural network architectures for popular image classification tasks. The efficiency of our method is compared against the standard training procedures, and against commonly used selective sampling alternatives: Hard negative mining selection, and Entropy-based selection. Finally, we demonstrate an additional speedup when we adopt a more aggressive learning drop regime while using the MMS selective sampling method. △ Less

Submitted 16 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Mix & Match: training convnets with mixed image sizes for improved accuracy, speed and scale resiliency

Authors: Elad Hoffer, Berry Weinstein, Itay Hubara, Tal Ben-Nun, Torsten Hoefler, Daniel Soudry

Abstract: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are commonly trained using a fixed spatial image size predetermined for a given model. Although trained on images of aspecific size, it is well established that CNNs can be used to evaluate a wide range of image sizes at test time, by adjusting the size of intermediate feature maps. In this work, we describe and evaluate a novel mixed-size training regime that… ▽ More Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are commonly trained using a fixed spatial image size predetermined for a given model. Although trained on images of aspecific size, it is well established that CNNs can be used to evaluate a wide range of image sizes at test time, by adjusting the size of intermediate feature maps. In this work, we describe and evaluate a novel mixed-size training regime that mixes several image sizes at training time. We demonstrate that models trained using our method are more resilient to image size changes and generalize well even on small images. This allows faster inference by using smaller images attest time. For instance, we receive a 76.43% top-1 accuracy using ResNet50 with an image size of 160, which matches the accuracy of the baseline model with 2x fewer computations. Furthermore, for a given image size used at test time, we show this method can be exploited either to accelerate training or the final test accuracy. For example, we are able to reach a 79.27% accuracy with a model evaluated at a 288 spatial size for a relative improvement of 14% over the baseline. △ Less

Submitted 12 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.