-
Probabilistic Richardson Extrapolation
Authors:
Chris. J. Oates,
Toni Karvonen,
Aretha L. Teckentrup,
Marina Strocchi,
Steven A. Niederer
Abstract:
For over a century, extrapolation methods have provided a powerful tool to improve the convergence order of a numerical method. However, these tools are not well-suited to modern computer codes, where multiple continua are discretised and convergence orders are not easily analysed. To address this challenge we present a probabilistic perspective on Richardson extrapolation, a point of view that un…
▽ More
For over a century, extrapolation methods have provided a powerful tool to improve the convergence order of a numerical method. However, these tools are not well-suited to modern computer codes, where multiple continua are discretised and convergence orders are not easily analysed. To address this challenge we present a probabilistic perspective on Richardson extrapolation, a point of view that unifies classical extrapolation methods with modern multi-fidelity modelling, and handles uncertain convergence orders by allowing these to be statistically estimated. The approach is developed using Gaussian processes, leading to Gauss-Richardson Extrapolation (GRE). Conditions are established under which extrapolation using the conditional mean achieves a polynomial (or even an exponential) speed-up compared to the original numerical method. Further, the probabilistic formulation unlocks the possibility of experimental design, casting the selection of fidelities as a continuous optimisation problem which can then be (approximately) solved. A case-study involving a computational cardiac model demonstrates that practical gains in accuracy can be achieved using the GRE method.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Convergence rates of non-stationary and deep Gaussian process regression
Authors:
Conor Moriarty-Osborne,
Aretha L. Teckentrup
Abstract:
The focus of this work is the convergence of non-stationary and deep Gaussian process regression. More precisely, we follow a Bayesian approach to regression or interpolation, where the prior placed on the unknown function $f$ is a non-stationary or deep Gaussian process, and we derive convergence rates of the posterior mean to the true function $f$ in terms of the number of observed training poin…
▽ More
The focus of this work is the convergence of non-stationary and deep Gaussian process regression. More precisely, we follow a Bayesian approach to regression or interpolation, where the prior placed on the unknown function $f$ is a non-stationary or deep Gaussian process, and we derive convergence rates of the posterior mean to the true function $f$ in terms of the number of observed training points. In some cases, we also show convergence of the posterior variance to zero. The only assumption imposed on the function $f$ is that it is an element of a certain reproducing kernel Hilbert space, which we in particular cases show to be norm-equivalent to a Sobolev space. Our analysis includes the case of estimated hyper-parameters in the covariance kernels employed, both in an empirical Bayes' setting and the particular hierarchical setting constructed through deep Gaussian processes. We consider the settings of noise-free or noisy observations on deterministic or random training points. We establish general assumptions sufficient for the convergence of deep Gaussian process regression, along with explicit examples demonstrating the fulfilment of these assumptions. Specifically, our examples require that the Hölder or Sobolev norms of the penultimate layer are bounded almost surely.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024; v1 submitted 12 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Gaussian processes for Bayesian inverse problems associated with linear partial differential equations
Authors:
Tianming Bai,
Aretha L. Teckentrup,
Konstantinos C. Zygalakis
Abstract:
This work is concerned with the use of Gaussian surrogate models for Bayesian inverse problems associated with linear partial differential equations. A particular focus is on the regime where only a small amount of training data is available. In this regime the type of Gaussian prior used is of critical importance with respect to how well the surrogate model will perform in terms of Bayesian inver…
▽ More
This work is concerned with the use of Gaussian surrogate models for Bayesian inverse problems associated with linear partial differential equations. A particular focus is on the regime where only a small amount of training data is available. In this regime the type of Gaussian prior used is of critical importance with respect to how well the surrogate model will perform in terms of Bayesian inversion. We extend the framework of Raissi et. al. (2017) to construct PDE-informed Gaussian priors that we then use to construct different approximate posteriors. A number of different numerical experiments illustrate the superiority of the PDE-informed Gaussian priors over more traditional priors.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Random forward models and log-likelihoods in Bayesian inverse problems
Authors:
H. C. Lie,
T. J. Sullivan,
A. L. Teckentrup
Abstract:
We consider the use of randomised forward models and log-likelihoods within the Bayesian approach to inverse problems. Such random approximations to the exact forward model or log-likelihood arise naturally when a computationally expensive model is approximated using a cheaper stochastic surrogate, as in Gaussian process emulation (kriging), or in the field of probabilistic numerical methods. We s…
▽ More
We consider the use of randomised forward models and log-likelihoods within the Bayesian approach to inverse problems. Such random approximations to the exact forward model or log-likelihood arise naturally when a computationally expensive model is approximated using a cheaper stochastic surrogate, as in Gaussian process emulation (kriging), or in the field of probabilistic numerical methods. We show that the Hellinger distance between the exact and approximate Bayesian posteriors is bounded by moments of the difference between the true and approximate log-likelihoods. Example applications of these stability results are given for randomised misfit models in large data applications and the probabilistic solution of ordinary differential equations.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2018; v1 submitted 15 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
