A Graphical Comparison of Screening Designs using Support Recovery Probabilities
Authors:
Kade Young,
Maria L. Weese,
Jonathan W. Stallrich,
Byran J. Smucker,
David J. Edwards
Abstract:
A screening experiment attempts to identify a subset of important effects using a relatively small number of experimental runs. Given the limited run size and a large number of possible effects, penalized regression is a popular tool used to analyze screening designs. In particular, an automated implementation of the Gauss-Dantzig selector has been widely recommended to compare screening design co…
▽ More
A screening experiment attempts to identify a subset of important effects using a relatively small number of experimental runs. Given the limited run size and a large number of possible effects, penalized regression is a popular tool used to analyze screening designs. In particular, an automated implementation of the Gauss-Dantzig selector has been widely recommended to compare screening design construction methods. Here, we illustrate potential reproducibility issues that arise when comparing screening designs via simulation, and recommend a graphical method, based on screening probabilities, which compares designs by evaluating them along the penalized regression solution path. This method can be implemented using simulation, or, in the case of lasso, by using exact local lasso sign recovery probabilities. Our approach circumvents the need to specify tuning parameters associated with regularization methods, leading to more reliable design comparisons. This article contains supplementary materials including code to implement the proposed methods.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
Optimal Designs for Two-Stage Inference
Authors:
Jonathan W. Stallrich,
Michael McKibben
Abstract:
The analysis of screening experiments is often done in two stages, starting with factor selection via an analysis under a main effects model. The success of this first stage is influenced by three components: (1) main effect estimators' variances and (2) bias, and (3) the estimate of the noise variance. Component (3) has only recently been given attention with design techniques that ensure an unbi…
▽ More
The analysis of screening experiments is often done in two stages, starting with factor selection via an analysis under a main effects model. The success of this first stage is influenced by three components: (1) main effect estimators' variances and (2) bias, and (3) the estimate of the noise variance. Component (3) has only recently been given attention with design techniques that ensure an unbiased estimate of the noise variance. In this paper, we propose a design criterion based on expected confidence intervals of the first stage analysis that balances all three components. To address model misspecification, we propose a computationally-efficient all-subsets analysis and a corresponding constrained design criterion based on lack-of-fit. Scenarios found in existing design literature are revisited with our criteria and new designs are provided that improve upon existing methods.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2024; v1 submitted 10 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
