Model-assisted estimation of domain totals, areas, and densities in two-stage sample survey designs
Authors:
Hans-Erik Andersen,
Göran Ståhl,
Bruce D. Cook,
Douglas C. Morton,
Andrew O. Finley
Abstract:
Model-assisted, two-stage forest survey sampling designs provide a means to combine airborne remote sensing data, collected in a sampling mode, with field plot data to increase the precision of national forest inventory estimates, while maintaining important properties of design-based inventories, such as unbiased estimation and quantification of uncertainty. In this study, we present a comprehens…
▽ More
Model-assisted, two-stage forest survey sampling designs provide a means to combine airborne remote sensing data, collected in a sampling mode, with field plot data to increase the precision of national forest inventory estimates, while maintaining important properties of design-based inventories, such as unbiased estimation and quantification of uncertainty. In this study, we present a comprehensive set of model-assisted estimators for domain-level attributes in a two-stage sampling design, including new estimators for densities, and compare the performance of these estimators with standard poststratified estimators. Simulation was used to assess the statistical properties (bias, variability) of these estimators, with both simple random and systematic sampling configurations, and indicated that 1) all estimators were generally unbiased. and 2) the use of lidar in a sampling mode increased the precision of the estimators at all assessed field sampling intensities, with particularly marked increases in precision at lower field sampling intensities. Variance estimators are generally unbiased for model-assisted estimators without poststratification, while model-assisted estimators with poststratification were increasingly biased as field sampling intensity decreased. In general, these results indicate that airborne remote sensing, collected in a sampling mode, can be used to increase the efficiency of national forest inventories.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
Estimation of boreal forest biomass from ICESat-2 data using hierarchical hybrid inference
Authors:
Petri Varvia,
Svetlana Saarela,
Matti Maltamo,
Petteri Packalen,
Terje Gobakken,
Erik Næsset,
Göran Ståhl,
Lauri Korhonen
Abstract:
The ICESat-2, launched in 2018, carries the ATLAS instrument, which is a photon-counting spaceborne lidar that provides strip samples over the terrain. While primarily designed for snow and ice monitoring, there has been a great interest in using ICESat-2 to predict forest above-ground biomass density (AGBD). As ICESat-2 is on a polar orbit, it provides good spatial coverage of boreal forests.
T…
▽ More
The ICESat-2, launched in 2018, carries the ATLAS instrument, which is a photon-counting spaceborne lidar that provides strip samples over the terrain. While primarily designed for snow and ice monitoring, there has been a great interest in using ICESat-2 to predict forest above-ground biomass density (AGBD). As ICESat-2 is on a polar orbit, it provides good spatial coverage of boreal forests.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the estimation of mean AGBD from ICESat-2 data using a hierarchical modeling approach combined with rigorous statistical inference. We propose a hierarchical hybrid inference approach for uncertainty quantification of the AGBD estimated from ICESat-2 lidar strips. Our approach models the errors coming from the multiple modeling steps, including the allometric models used for predicting tree-level AGB. For testing the procedure, we have data from two adjacent study sites, denoted Valtimo and Nurmes, of which Valtimo site is used for model training and Nurmes for validation.
The ICESat-2 estimated mean AGBD in the Nurmes validation area was 63.2$\pm$1.9 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 2.9%). The local reference hierarchical model-based estimate obtained from wall-to-wall airborne lidar data was 63.9$\pm$0.6 Mg/ha (relative standard error of 1.0%). The reference estimate was within the 95% confidence interval of the ICESat-2 hierarchical hybrid estimate. The small standard errors indicate that the proposed method is useful for AGBD assessment. However, some sources of error were not accounted for in the study and thus the real uncertainties are probably slightly larger than those reported.
△ Less
Submitted 10 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
