Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Spinelli, I

TopoX: A Suite of Python Packages for Machine Learning on Topological Domains

Authors: Mustafa Hajij, Mathilde Papillon, Florian Frantzen, Jens Agerberg, Ibrahem AlJabea, Ruben Ballester, Claudio Battiloro, Guillermo Bernárdez, Tolga Birdal, Aiden Brent, Peter Chin, Sergio Escalera, Simone Fiorellino, Odin Hoff Gardaa, Gurusankar Gopalakrishnan, Devendra Govil, Josef Hoppe, Maneel Reddy Karri, Jude Khouja, Manuel Lecha, Neal Livesay, Jan Meißner, Soham Mukherjee, Alexander Nikitin, Theodore Papamarkou , et al. (18 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We introduce TopoX, a Python software suite that provides reliable and user-friendly building blocks for computing and machine learning on topological domains that extend graphs: hypergraphs, simplicial, cellular, path and combinatorial complexes. TopoX consists of three packages: TopoNetX facilitates constructing and computing on these domains, including working with nodes, edges and higher-order… ▽ More We introduce TopoX, a Python software suite that provides reliable and user-friendly building blocks for computing and machine learning on topological domains that extend graphs: hypergraphs, simplicial, cellular, path and combinatorial complexes. TopoX consists of three packages: TopoNetX facilitates constructing and computing on these domains, including working with nodes, edges and higher-order cells; TopoEmbedX provides methods to embed topological domains into vector spaces, akin to popular graph-based embedding algorithms such as node2vec; TopoModelx is built on top of PyTorch and offers a comprehensive toolbox of higher-order message passing functions for neural networks on topological domains. The extensively documented and unit-tested source code of TopoX is available under MIT license at https://pyt-team.github.io/. △ Less

Submitted 17 February, 2024; v1 submitted 4 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Drop Edges and Adapt: a Fairness Enforcing Fine-tuning for Graph Neural Networks

Authors: Indro Spinelli, Riccardo Bianchini, Simone Scardapane

Abstract: The rise of graph representation learning as the primary solution for many different network science tasks led to a surge of interest in the fairness of this family of methods. Link prediction, in particular, has a substantial social impact. However, link prediction algorithms tend to increase the segregation in social networks by disfavoring the links between individuals in specific demographic g… ▽ More The rise of graph representation learning as the primary solution for many different network science tasks led to a surge of interest in the fairness of this family of methods. Link prediction, in particular, has a substantial social impact. However, link prediction algorithms tend to increase the segregation in social networks by disfavoring the links between individuals in specific demographic groups. This paper proposes a novel way to enforce fairness on graph neural networks with a fine-tuning strategy. We Drop the unfair Edges and, simultaneously, we Adapt the model's parameters to those modifications, DEA in short. We introduce two covariance-based constraints designed explicitly for the link prediction task. We use these constraints to guide the optimization process responsible for learning the new "fair" adjacency matrix. One novelty of DEA is that we can use a discrete yet learnable adjacency matrix in our fine-tuning. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on five real-world datasets and show that we can improve both the accuracy and the fairness of the link prediction tasks. In addition, we present an in-depth ablation study demonstrating that our training algorithm for the adjacency matrix can be used to improve link prediction performances during training. Finally, we compute the relevance of each component of our framework to show that the combination of both the constraints and the training of the adjacency matrix leads to optimal performances. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

A Meta-Learning Approach for Training Explainable Graph Neural Networks

Authors: Indro Spinelli, Simone Scardapane, Aurelio Uncini

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the degree of explainability of graph neural networks (GNNs). Existing explainers work by finding global/local subgraphs to explain a prediction, but they are applied after a GNN has already been trained. Here, we propose a meta-learning framework for improving the level of explainability of a GNN directly at training time, by steering the optimization procedure towar… ▽ More In this paper, we investigate the degree of explainability of graph neural networks (GNNs). Existing explainers work by finding global/local subgraphs to explain a prediction, but they are applied after a GNN has already been trained. Here, we propose a meta-learning framework for improving the level of explainability of a GNN directly at training time, by steering the optimization procedure towards what we call `interpretable minima'. Our framework (called MATE, MetA-Train to Explain) jointly trains a model to solve the original task, e.g., node classification, and to provide easily processable outputs for downstream algorithms that explain the model's decisions in a human-friendly way. In particular, we meta-train the model's parameters to quickly minimize the error of an instance-level GNNExplainer trained on-the-fly on randomly sampled nodes. The final internal representation relies upon a set of features that can be `better' understood by an explanation algorithm, e.g., another instance of GNNExplainer. Our model-agnostic approach can improve the explanations produced for different GNN architectures and use any instance-based explainer to drive this process. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets for node and graph classification show that we can produce models that are consistently easier to explain by different algorithms. Furthermore, this increase in explainability comes at no cost for the accuracy of the model. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2022; v1 submitted 20 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

FairDrop: Biased Edge Dropout for Enhancing Fairness in Graph Representation Learning

Authors: Indro Spinelli, Simone Scardapane, Amir Hussain, Aurelio Uncini

Abstract: Graph representation learning has become a ubiquitous component in many scenarios, ranging from social network analysis to energy forecasting in smart grids. In several applications, ensuring the fairness of the node (or graph) representations with respect to some protected attributes is crucial for their correct deployment. Yet, fairness in graph deep learning remains under-explored, with few sol… ▽ More Graph representation learning has become a ubiquitous component in many scenarios, ranging from social network analysis to energy forecasting in smart grids. In several applications, ensuring the fairness of the node (or graph) representations with respect to some protected attributes is crucial for their correct deployment. Yet, fairness in graph deep learning remains under-explored, with few solutions available. In particular, the tendency of similar nodes to cluster on several real-world graphs (i.e., homophily) can dramatically worsen the fairness of these procedures. In this paper, we propose a novel biased edge dropout algorithm (FairDrop) to counter-act homophily and improve fairness in graph representation learning. FairDrop can be plugged in easily on many existing algorithms, is efficient, adaptable, and can be combined with other fairness-inducing solutions. After describing the general algorithm, we demonstrate its application on two benchmark tasks, specifically, as a random walk model for producing node embeddings, and to a graph convolutional network for link prediction. We prove that the proposed algorithm can successfully improve the fairness of all models up to a small or negligible drop in accuracy, and compares favourably with existing state-of-the-art solutions. In an ablation study, we demonstrate that our algorithm can flexibly interpolate between biasing towards fairness and an unbiased edge dropout. Furthermore, to better evaluate the gains, we propose a new dyadic group definition to measure the bias of a link prediction task when paired with group-based fairness metrics. In particular, we extend the metric used to measure the bias in the node embeddings to take into account the graph structure. △ Less

Submitted 27 December, 2021; v1 submitted 29 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Submitted to a journal for the peer-review process

Distributed Training of Graph Convolutional Networks

Authors: Simone Scardapane, Indro Spinelli, Paolo Di Lorenzo

Abstract: The aim of this work is to develop a fully-distributed algorithmic framework for training graph convolutional networks (GCNs). The proposed method is able to exploit the meaningful relational structure of the input data, which are collected by a set of agents that communicate over a sparse network topology. After formulating the centralized GCN training problem, we first show how to make inference… ▽ More The aim of this work is to develop a fully-distributed algorithmic framework for training graph convolutional networks (GCNs). The proposed method is able to exploit the meaningful relational structure of the input data, which are collected by a set of agents that communicate over a sparse network topology. After formulating the centralized GCN training problem, we first show how to make inference in a distributed scenario where the underlying data graph is split among different agents. Then, we propose a distributed gradient descent procedure to solve the GCN training problem. The resulting model distributes computation along three lines: during inference, during back-propagation, and during optimization. Convergence to stationary solutions of the GCN training problem is also established under mild conditions. Finally, we propose an optimization criterion to design the communication topology between agents in order to match with the graph describing data relationships. A wide set of numerical results validate our proposal. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work combining graph convolutional neural networks with distributed optimization. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2021; v1 submitted 13 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Published on IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks

Journal ref: IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, vol. 7, pp. 87-100, 2021

Adaptive Propagation Graph Convolutional Network

Authors: Indro Spinelli, Simone Scardapane, Aurelio Uncini

Abstract: Graph convolutional networks (GCNs) are a family of neural network models that perform inference on graph data by interleaving vertex-wise operations and message-passing exchanges across nodes. Concerning the latter, two key questions arise: (i) how to design a differentiable exchange protocol (e.g., a 1-hop Laplacian smoothing in the original GCN), and (ii) how to characterize the trade-off in co… ▽ More Graph convolutional networks (GCNs) are a family of neural network models that perform inference on graph data by interleaving vertex-wise operations and message-passing exchanges across nodes. Concerning the latter, two key questions arise: (i) how to design a differentiable exchange protocol (e.g., a 1-hop Laplacian smoothing in the original GCN), and (ii) how to characterize the trade-off in complexity with respect to the local updates. In this paper, we show that state-of-the-art results can be achieved by adapting the number of communication steps independently at every node. In particular, we endow each node with a halting unit (inspired by Graves' adaptive computation time) that after every exchange decides whether to continue communicating or not. We show that the proposed adaptive propagation GCN (AP-GCN) achieves superior or similar results to the best proposed models so far on a number of benchmarks, while requiring a small overhead in terms of additional parameters. We also investigate a regularization term to enforce an explicit trade-off between communication and accuracy. The code for the AP-GCN experiments is released as an open-source library. △ Less

Submitted 28 September, 2020; v1 submitted 24 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: Published in IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Journal ref: IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2020

Efficient data augmentation using graph imputation neural networks

Authors: Indro Spinelli, Simone Scardapane, Michele Scarpiniti, Aurelio Uncini

Abstract: Recently, data augmentation in the semi-supervised regime, where unlabeled data vastly outnumbers labeled data, has received a considerable attention. In this paper, we describe an efficient technique for this task, exploiting a recent framework we proposed for missing data imputation called graph imputation neural network (GINN). The key idea is to leverage both supervised and unsupervised data t… ▽ More Recently, data augmentation in the semi-supervised regime, where unlabeled data vastly outnumbers labeled data, has received a considerable attention. In this paper, we describe an efficient technique for this task, exploiting a recent framework we proposed for missing data imputation called graph imputation neural network (GINN). The key idea is to leverage both supervised and unsupervised data to build a graph of similarities between points in the dataset. Then, we augment the dataset by severely damaging a few of the nodes (up to 80\% of their features), and reconstructing them using a variation of GINN. On several benchmark datasets, we show that our method can obtain significant improvements compared to a fully-supervised model, and we are able to augment the datasets up to a factor of 10x. This points to the power of graph-based neural networks to represent structural affinities in the samples for tasks of data reconstruction and augmentation. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: Presented at the 2019 Italian Workshop on Neural Networks (WIRN'19)

Missing Data Imputation with Adversarially-trained Graph Convolutional Networks

Authors: Indro Spinelli, Simone Scardapane, Aurelio Uncini

Abstract: Missing data imputation (MDI) is a fundamental problem in many scientific disciplines. Popular methods for MDI use global statistics computed from the entire data set (e.g., the feature-wise medians), or build predictive models operating independently on every instance. In this paper we propose a more general framework for MDI, leveraging recent work in the field of graph neural networks (GNNs). W… ▽ More Missing data imputation (MDI) is a fundamental problem in many scientific disciplines. Popular methods for MDI use global statistics computed from the entire data set (e.g., the feature-wise medians), or build predictive models operating independently on every instance. In this paper we propose a more general framework for MDI, leveraging recent work in the field of graph neural networks (GNNs). We formulate the MDI task in terms of a graph denoising autoencoder, where each edge of the graph encodes the similarity between two patterns. A GNN encoder learns to build intermediate representations for each example by interleaving classical projection layers and locally combining information between neighbors, while another decoding GNN learns to reconstruct the full imputed data set from this intermediate embedding. In order to speed-up training and improve the performance, we use a combination of multiple losses, including an adversarial loss implemented with the Wasserstein metric and a gradient penalty. We also explore a few extensions to the basic architecture involving the use of residual connections between layers, and of global statistics computed from the data set to improve the accuracy. On a large experimental evaluation, we show that our method robustly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches for MDI, especially for large percentages of missing values. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2020; v1 submitted 6 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: Published in Neural Networks (2020)

Journal ref: Neural Networks, 129, pp. 249-260, 2020