Gerontologic Biostatistics 2.0: Developments over 10+ years in the age of data science
Authors:
Chixiang Chen,
Michelle Shardell,
Jaime Lynn Speiser,
Karen Bandeen-Roche,
Heather Allore,
Thomas G Travison,
Michael Griswold,
Terrence E. Murphy
Abstract:
Background: Introduced in 2010, the sub-discipline of gerontologic biostatistics (GBS) was conceptualized to address the specific challenges in analyzing data from research studies involving older adults. However, the evolving technological landscape has catalyzed data science and statistical advancements since the original GBS publication, greatly expanding the scope of gerontologic research. The…
▽ More
Background: Introduced in 2010, the sub-discipline of gerontologic biostatistics (GBS) was conceptualized to address the specific challenges in analyzing data from research studies involving older adults. However, the evolving technological landscape has catalyzed data science and statistical advancements since the original GBS publication, greatly expanding the scope of gerontologic research. There is a need to describe how these advancements enhance the analysis of multi-modal data and complex phenotypes that are hallmarks of gerontologic research. Methods: This paper introduces GBS 2.0, an updated and expanded set of analytical methods reflective of the practice of gerontologic biostatistics in contemporary and future research. Results: GBS 2.0 topics and relevant software resources include cutting-edge methods in experimental design; analytical techniques that include adaptations of machine learning, quantifying deep phenotypic measurements, high-dimensional -omics analysis; the integration of information from multiple studies, and strategies to foster reproducibility, replicability, and open science. Discussion: The methodological topics presented here seek to update and expand GBS. By facilitating the synthesis of biostatistics and data science in gerontology, we aim to foster the next generation of gerontologic researchers.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
Accelerated and interpretable oblique random survival forests
Authors:
Byron C. Jaeger,
Sawyer Welden,
Kristin Lenoir,
Jaime L. Speiser,
Matthew W. Segar,
Ambarish Pandey,
Nicholas M. Pajewski
Abstract:
The oblique random survival forest (RSF) is an ensemble supervised learning method for right-censored outcomes. Trees in the oblique RSF are grown using linear combinations of predictors to create branches, whereas in the standard RSF, a single predictor is used. Oblique RSF ensembles often have higher prediction accuracy than standard RSF ensembles. However, assessing all possible linear combinat…
▽ More
The oblique random survival forest (RSF) is an ensemble supervised learning method for right-censored outcomes. Trees in the oblique RSF are grown using linear combinations of predictors to create branches, whereas in the standard RSF, a single predictor is used. Oblique RSF ensembles often have higher prediction accuracy than standard RSF ensembles. However, assessing all possible linear combinations of predictors induces significant computational overhead that limits applications to large-scale data sets. In addition, few methods have been developed for interpretation of oblique RSF ensembles, and they remain more difficult to interpret compared to their axis-based counterparts. We introduce a method to increase computational efficiency of the oblique RSF and a method to estimate importance of individual predictor variables with the oblique RSF. Our strategy to reduce computational overhead makes use of Newton-Raphson scoring, a classical optimization technique that we apply to the Cox partial likelihood function within each non-leaf node of decision trees. We estimate the importance of individual predictors for the oblique RSF by negating each coefficient used for the given predictor in linear combinations, and then computing the reduction in out-of-bag accuracy. In general benchmarking experiments, we find that our implementation of the oblique RSF is approximately 450 times faster with equivalent discrimination and superior Brier score compared to existing software for oblique RSFs. We find in simulation studies that 'negation importance' discriminates between relevant and irrelevant predictors more reliably than permutation importance, Shapley additive explanations, and a previously introduced technique to measure variable importance with oblique RSFs based on analysis of variance. Methods introduced in the current study are available in the aorsf R package.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
