Skip to main content

Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Sanz-Serna, J M

Searching in archive stat. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2308.09460  [pdf, other

    stat.CO cs.CV math.NA stat.ML

    Accelerated Bayesian imaging by relaxed proximal-point Langevin sampling

    Authors: Teresa Klatzer, Paul Dobson, Yoann Altmann, Marcelo Pereyra, Jesús María Sanz-Serna, Konstantinos C. Zygalakis

    Abstract: This paper presents a new accelerated proximal Markov chain Monte Carlo methodology to perform Bayesian inference in imaging inverse problems with an underlying convex geometry. The proposed strategy takes the form of a stochastic relaxed proximal-point iteration that admits two complementary interpretations. For models that are smooth or regularised by Moreau-Yosida smoothing, the algorithm is eq… ▽ More

    Submitted 12 January, 2024; v1 submitted 18 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

    Comments: 34 pages, 13 figures

    MSC Class: 65C40; 68U10; 62F15; 65C60; 65J22; 68W25

  2. arXiv:2307.02096  [pdf, other

    stat.CO math.NA stat.ME

    Adaptive multi-stage integration schemes for Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

    Authors: Lorenzo Nagar, Mario Fernández-Pendás, Jesús María Sanz-Serna, Elena Akhmatskaya

    Abstract: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) is a powerful tool for Bayesian statistical inference due to its potential to rapidly explore high dimensional state space, avoiding the random walk behavior typical of many Markov Chain Monte Carlo samplers. The proper choice of the integrator of the Hamiltonian dynamics is key to the efficiency of HMC. It is becoming increasingly clear that multi-stage splitting int… ▽ More

    Submitted 31 January, 2024; v1 submitted 5 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

    Journal ref: Journal of Computational Physics, Volume 502, 1 April 2024, 112800

  3. arXiv:2305.08658  [pdf, other

    math.OC math.NA stat.ML

    On the connections between optimization algorithms, Lyapunov functions, and differential equations: theory and insights

    Authors: Paul Dobson, Jesus Maria Sanz-Serna, Konstantinos Zygalakis

    Abstract: We revisit the general framework introduced by Fazylab et al. (SIAM J. Optim. 28, 2018) to construct Lyapunov functions for optimization algorithms in discrete and continuous time. For smooth, strongly convex objective functions, we relax the requirements necessary for such a construction. As a result we are able to prove for Polyak's ordinary differential equations and for a two-parameter family… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 May, 2024; v1 submitted 15 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

    Comments: 23 pages, 5 figures

    MSC Class: 65L06; 65L20; 90C25; 93C15

  4. arXiv:2207.07516  [pdf, other

    stat.CO

    Split Hamiltonian Monte Carlo revisited

    Authors: Fernando Casas, Jesús María Sanz-Serna, Luke Shaw

    Abstract: We study Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) samplers based on splitting the Hamiltonian $H$ as $H_0(θ,p)+U_1(θ)$, where $H_0$ is quadratic and $U_1$ small. We show that, in general, such samplers suffer from stepsize stability restrictions similar to those of algorithms based on the standard leapfrog integrator. The restrictions may be circumvented by preconditioning the dynamics. Numerical experiments… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

    Comments: 25 pages, 6 figures

  5. arXiv:2104.12384  [pdf, ps, other

    stat.ML cs.LG math.NA math.PR

    Wasserstein distance estimates for the distributions of numerical approximations to ergodic stochastic differential equations

    Authors: J. M. Sanz-Serna, Konstantinos C. Zygalakis

    Abstract: We present a framework that allows for the non-asymptotic study of the $2$-Wasserstein distance between the invariant distribution of an ergodic stochastic differential equation and the distribution of its numerical approximation in the strongly log-concave case. This allows us to study in a unified way a number of different integrators proposed in the literature for the overdamped and underdamped… ▽ More

    Submitted 24 September, 2021; v1 submitted 26 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

    Comments: 29 pages, 2 figures

    MSC Class: 65C40; 60H10; 60H35

  6. arXiv:2005.01336   

    stat.CO math.NA

    Is the NUTS algorithm correct?

    Authors: J. M. Sanz-Serna

    Abstract: This paper is devoted to investigate whether the popular No U-turn (NUTS) sampling algorithm is correct, i.e.\ whether the target probability distribution is \emph{exactly} conserved by the algorithm. It turns out that one of the Gibbs substeps used in the algorithm cannot always be guaranteed to be correct.

    Submitted 7 May, 2020; v1 submitted 4 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

    Comments: Some statements in the paper are misleading. It is possible to think of NUTS at not being a slice/Gibbs sampler and, with an alternative interpretation, it may be be possible to prove that the algorithm is correct. In addition the experiment reported in Figure 2 should have had many initial states drawn from the target rather than using a single value

  7. arXiv:1912.03253  [pdf, other

    stat.CO math.NA

    HMC: avoiding rejections by not using leapfrog and some results on the acceptance rate

    Authors: M. P. Calvo, D. Sanz-Alonso, J. M. Sanz-Serna

    Abstract: The leapfrog integrator is routinely used within the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method and its variants. We give strong numerical evidence that alternative, easy to implement algorithms yield fewer rejections with a given computational effort. When the dimensionality of the target distribution is high, the number of accepted proposals may be multiplied by a factor of three or more. This increase in t… ▽ More

    Submitted 2 April, 2021; v1 submitted 6 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

    Comments: 37 pages, 8 figures

  8. arXiv:1711.05337  [pdf, other

    math.PR math.NA stat.CO stat.ME

    Geometric integrators and the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method

    Authors: Nawaf Bou-Rabee, Jesús María Sanz-Serna

    Abstract: This paper surveys in detail the relations between numerical integration and the Hamiltonian (or hybrid) Monte Carlo method (HMC). Since the computational cost of HMC mainly lies in the numerical integrations, these should be performed as efficiently as possible. However, HMC requires methods that have the geometric properties of being volume-preserving and reversible, and this limits the number o… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

    Comments: Final version will appear in Acta Numerica 2018

    Journal ref: Acta Numerica, Vol. 27, pp. 113-206, 2018