-
Ensembles of Locally Independent Prediction Models
Authors:
Andrew Slavin Ross,
Weiwei Pan,
Leo Anthony Celi,
Finale Doshi-Velez
Abstract:
Ensembles depend on diversity for improved performance. Many ensemble training methods, therefore, attempt to optimize for diversity, which they almost always define in terms of differences in training set predictions. In this paper, however, we demonstrate the diversity of predictions on the training set does not necessarily imply diversity under mild covariate shift, which can harm generalizatio…
▽ More
Ensembles depend on diversity for improved performance. Many ensemble training methods, therefore, attempt to optimize for diversity, which they almost always define in terms of differences in training set predictions. In this paper, however, we demonstrate the diversity of predictions on the training set does not necessarily imply diversity under mild covariate shift, which can harm generalization in practical settings. To address this issue, we introduce a new diversity metric and associated method of training ensembles of models that extrapolate differently on local patches of the data manifold. Across a variety of synthetic and real-world tasks, we find that our method improves generalization and diversity in qualitatively novel ways, especially under data limits and covariate shift.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2020; v1 submitted 4 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning
Authors:
David Rolnick,
Priya L. Donti,
Lynn H. Kaack,
Kelly Kochanski,
Alexandre Lacoste,
Kris Sankaran,
Andrew Slavin Ross,
Nikola Milojevic-Dupont,
Natasha Jaques,
Anna Waldman-Brown,
Alexandra Luccioni,
Tegan Maharaj,
Evan D. Sherwin,
S. Karthik Mukkavilli,
Konrad P. Kording,
Carla Gomes,
Andrew Y. Ng,
Demis Hassabis,
John C. Platt,
Felix Creutzig,
Jennifer Chayes,
Yoshua Bengio
Abstract:
Climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing humanity, and we, as machine learning experts, may wonder how we can help. Here we describe how machine learning can be a powerful tool in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and hel** society adapt to a changing climate. From smart grids to disaster management, we identify high impact problems where existing gaps can be filled by machine lea…
▽ More
Climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing humanity, and we, as machine learning experts, may wonder how we can help. Here we describe how machine learning can be a powerful tool in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and hel** society adapt to a changing climate. From smart grids to disaster management, we identify high impact problems where existing gaps can be filled by machine learning, in collaboration with other fields. Our recommendations encompass exciting research questions as well as promising business opportunities. We call on the machine learning community to join the global effort against climate change.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2019; v1 submitted 10 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Training Machine Learning Models by Regularizing their Explanations
Authors:
Andrew Slavin Ross
Abstract:
Neural networks are among the most accurate supervised learning methods in use today. However, their opacity makes them difficult to trust in critical applications, especially when conditions in training may differ from those in practice. Recent efforts to develop explanations for neural networks and machine learning models more generally have produced tools to shed light on the implicit rules beh…
▽ More
Neural networks are among the most accurate supervised learning methods in use today. However, their opacity makes them difficult to trust in critical applications, especially when conditions in training may differ from those in practice. Recent efforts to develop explanations for neural networks and machine learning models more generally have produced tools to shed light on the implicit rules behind predictions. These tools can help us identify when models are right for the wrong reasons. However, they do not always scale to explaining predictions for entire datasets, are not always at the right level of abstraction, and most importantly cannot correct the problems they reveal. In this thesis, we explore the possibility of training machine learning models (with a particular focus on neural networks) using explanations themselves. We consider approaches where models are penalized not only for making incorrect predictions but also for providing explanations that are either inconsistent with domain knowledge or overly complex. These methods let us train models which can not only provide more interpretable rationales for their predictions but also generalize better when training data is confounded or meaningfully different from test data (even adversarially so).
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Learning Qualitatively Diverse and Interpretable Rules for Classification
Authors:
Andrew Slavin Ross,
Weiwei Pan,
Finale Doshi-Velez
Abstract:
There has been growing interest in develo** accurate models that can also be explained to humans. Unfortunately, if there exist multiple distinct but accurate models for some dataset, current machine learning methods are unlikely to find them: standard techniques will likely recover a complex model that combines them. In this work, we introduce a way to identify a maximal set of distinct but acc…
▽ More
There has been growing interest in develo** accurate models that can also be explained to humans. Unfortunately, if there exist multiple distinct but accurate models for some dataset, current machine learning methods are unlikely to find them: standard techniques will likely recover a complex model that combines them. In this work, we introduce a way to identify a maximal set of distinct but accurate models for a dataset. We demonstrate empirically that, in situations where the data supports multiple accurate classifiers, we tend to recover simpler, more interpretable classifiers rather than more complex ones.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2018; v1 submitted 22 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Human-in-the-Loop Interpretability Prior
Authors:
Isaac Lage,
Andrew Slavin Ross,
Been Kim,
Samuel J. Gershman,
Finale Doshi-Velez
Abstract:
We often desire our models to be interpretable as well as accurate. Prior work on optimizing models for interpretability has relied on easy-to-quantify proxies for interpretability, such as sparsity or the number of operations required. In this work, we optimize for interpretability by directly including humans in the optimization loop. We develop an algorithm that minimizes the number of user stu…
▽ More
We often desire our models to be interpretable as well as accurate. Prior work on optimizing models for interpretability has relied on easy-to-quantify proxies for interpretability, such as sparsity or the number of operations required. In this work, we optimize for interpretability by directly including humans in the optimization loop. We develop an algorithm that minimizes the number of user studies to find models that are both predictive and interpretable and demonstrate our approach on several data sets. Our human subjects results show trends towards different proxy notions of interpretability on different datasets, which suggests that different proxies are preferred on different tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2018; v1 submitted 29 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanations
Authors:
Andrew Slavin Ross,
Michael C. Hughes,
Finale Doshi-Velez
Abstract:
Neural networks are among the most accurate supervised learning methods in use today, but their opacity makes them difficult to trust in critical applications, especially when conditions in training differ from those in test. Recent work on explanations for black-box models has produced tools (e.g. LIME) to show the implicit rules behind predictions, which can help us identify when models are righ…
▽ More
Neural networks are among the most accurate supervised learning methods in use today, but their opacity makes them difficult to trust in critical applications, especially when conditions in training differ from those in test. Recent work on explanations for black-box models has produced tools (e.g. LIME) to show the implicit rules behind predictions, which can help us identify when models are right for the wrong reasons. However, these methods do not scale to explaining entire datasets and cannot correct the problems they reveal. We introduce a method for efficiently explaining and regularizing differentiable models by examining and selectively penalizing their input gradients, which provide a normal to the decision boundary. We apply these penalties both based on expert annotation and in an unsupervised fashion that encourages diverse models with qualitatively different decision boundaries for the same classification problem. On multiple datasets, we show our approach generates faithful explanations and models that generalize much better when conditions differ between training and test.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2017; v1 submitted 10 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
