-
Estimation of Poverty Measures for Small Areas Under a Two-Fold Nested Error Linear Regression Model: Comparison of Two Methods
Authors:
Maryam Sohrabi,
J. N. K. Rao
Abstract:
Demand for reliable statistics at a local area (small area) level has greatly increased in recent years. Traditional area-specific estimators based on probability samples are not adequate because of small sample size or even zero sample size in a local area. As a result, methods based on models linking the areas are widely used. World Bank focused on estimating poverty measures, in particular pove…
▽ More
Demand for reliable statistics at a local area (small area) level has greatly increased in recent years. Traditional area-specific estimators based on probability samples are not adequate because of small sample size or even zero sample size in a local area. As a result, methods based on models linking the areas are widely used. World Bank focused on estimating poverty measures, in particular poverty incidence and poverty gap called FGT measures, using a simulated census method, called ELL, based on a one-fold nested error model for a suitable transformation of the welfare variable. Modified ELL methods leading to significant gain in efficiency over ELL also have been proposed under the one-fold model. An advantage of ELL and modified ELL methods is that distributional assumptions on the random effects in the model are not needed. In this paper, we extend ELL and modified ELL to two-fold nested error models to estimate poverty indicators for areas (say a state) and subareas (say counties within a state). Our simulation results indicate that the modified ELL estimators lead to large efficiency gains over ELL at the area level and subarea level. Further, modified ELL method retaining both area and subarea estimated effects in the model (called MELL2) performs significantly better in terms of mean squared error (MSE) for sampled subareas than the modified ELL retaining only estimated area effect in the model (called MELL1).
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Empirical Likelihood Inference With Public-Use Survey Data
Authors:
Puying Zhao,
J. N. K. Rao,
Changbao Wu
Abstract:
Public-use survey data are an important source of information for researchers in social science and health studies to build statistical models and make inferences on the target finite population. This paper presents two general inferential tools through the pseudo empirical likelihood and the sample empirical likelihood methods. Theoretical results on point estimation and linear or nonlinear hypot…
▽ More
Public-use survey data are an important source of information for researchers in social science and health studies to build statistical models and make inferences on the target finite population. This paper presents two general inferential tools through the pseudo empirical likelihood and the sample empirical likelihood methods. Theoretical results on point estimation and linear or nonlinear hypothesis tests involving parameters defined through estimating equations are established, and practical issues with the implementation of the proposed methods are discussed. Results from simulation studies and an application to the 2016 General Social Survey dataset of Statistics Canada show that the proposed methods work well under different scenarios. The inferential procedures and theoretical results presented in the paper make the empirical likelihood a practically useful tool for users of complex survey data.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Hypotheses Testing from Complex Survey Data Using Bootstrap Weights: A Unified Approach
Authors:
Jae-kwang Kim,
J. N. K. Rao,
Zhonglei Wang
Abstract:
Standard statistical methods that do not take proper account of the complexity of survey design can lead to erroneous inferences when applied to survey data due to unequal selection probabilities, clustering, and other design features. In particular, the actual type I error rates of tests of hypotheses using standard methods can be much bigger than the nominal significance level. Methods that take…
▽ More
Standard statistical methods that do not take proper account of the complexity of survey design can lead to erroneous inferences when applied to survey data due to unequal selection probabilities, clustering, and other design features. In particular, the actual type I error rates of tests of hypotheses using standard methods can be much bigger than the nominal significance level. Methods that take account of survey design features in testing hypotheses have been proposed, including Wald tests and quasi-score tests that involve the estimated covariance matrices of parameter estimates. In this paper, we present a unified approach to hypothesis testing that does not require computing the covariance matrices by constructing bootstrap approximations to weighted likelihood ratio statistics and weighted quasi-score statistics and establish the asymptotic validity of the proposed bootstrap tests. In addition, we also consider hypothesis testing from categorical data and present a bootstrap procedure for testing simple goodness of fit and independence in a two-way table. In the simulation studies, the type I error rates of the proposed approach are much closer to their nominal significance level compared with the naive likelihood-ratio test and quasi-score test. An application to data from an educational survey under a logistic regression model is also presented.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2021; v1 submitted 24 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Small area estimation of general parameters with application to poverty indicators: A hierarchical Bayes approach
Authors:
Isabel Molina,
Balgobin Nandram,
J. N. K. Rao
Abstract:
Poverty maps are used to aid important political decisions such as allocation of development funds by governments and international organizations. Those decisions should be based on the most accurate poverty figures. However, often reliable poverty figures are not available at fine geographical levels or for particular risk population subgroups due to the sample size limitation of current national…
▽ More
Poverty maps are used to aid important political decisions such as allocation of development funds by governments and international organizations. Those decisions should be based on the most accurate poverty figures. However, often reliable poverty figures are not available at fine geographical levels or for particular risk population subgroups due to the sample size limitation of current national surveys. These surveys cannot cover adequately all the desired areas or population subgroups and, therefore, models relating the different areas are needed to 'borrow strength" from area to area. In particular, the Spanish Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) produces national poverty estimates but cannot provide poverty estimates by Spanish provinces due to the poor precision of direct estimates, which use only the province specific data. It also raises the ethical question of whether poverty is more severe for women than for men in a given province. We develop a hierarchical Bayes (HB) approach for poverty map** in Spanish provinces by gender that overcomes the small province sample size problem of the SILC. The proposed approach has a wide scope of application because it can be used to estimate general nonlinear parameters. We use a Bayesian version of the nested error regression model in which Markov chain Monte Carlo procedures and the convergence monitoring therein are avoided. A simulation study reveals good frequentist properties of the HB approach. The resulting poverty maps indicate that poverty, both in frequency and intensity, is localized mostly in the southern and western provinces and it is more acute for women than for men in most of the provinces.
△ Less
Submitted 31 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
Rejoinder
Authors:
J. N. K. Rao
Abstract:
Rejoinder of "Impact of Frequentist and Bayesian Methods on Survey Sampling Practice: A Selective Appraisal" by J. N. K. Rao [arXiv:1108.2356]
Rejoinder of "Impact of Frequentist and Bayesian Methods on Survey Sampling Practice: A Selective Appraisal" by J. N. K. Rao [arXiv:1108.2356]
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2011;
originally announced August 2011.
-
Impact of Frequentist and Bayesian Methods on Survey Sampling Practice: A Selective Appraisal
Authors:
J. N. K. Rao
Abstract:
According to Hansen, Madow and Tep** [J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 78 (1983) 776--793], "Probability sampling designs and randomization inference are widely accepted as the standard approach in sample surveys." In this article, reasons are advanced for the wide use of this design-based approach, particularly by federal agencies and other survey organizations conducting complex large scale surveys on…
▽ More
According to Hansen, Madow and Tep** [J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 78 (1983) 776--793], "Probability sampling designs and randomization inference are widely accepted as the standard approach in sample surveys." In this article, reasons are advanced for the wide use of this design-based approach, particularly by federal agencies and other survey organizations conducting complex large scale surveys on topics related to public policy. Impact of Bayesian methods in survey sampling is also discussed in two different directions: nonparametric calibrated Bayesian inferences from large samples and hierarchical Bayes methods for small area estimation based on parametric models.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2011;
originally announced August 2011.
