-
The non-overlap** statistical approximation to overlap** group lasso
Authors:
Mingyu Qi,
Tianxi Li
Abstract:
Group lasso is a commonly used regularization method in statistical learning in which parameters are eliminated from the model according to predefined groups. However, when the groups overlap, optimizing the group lasso penalized objective can be time-consuming on large-scale problems because of the non-separability induced by the overlap** groups. This bottleneck has seriously limited the appli…
▽ More
Group lasso is a commonly used regularization method in statistical learning in which parameters are eliminated from the model according to predefined groups. However, when the groups overlap, optimizing the group lasso penalized objective can be time-consuming on large-scale problems because of the non-separability induced by the overlap** groups. This bottleneck has seriously limited the application of overlap** group lasso regularization in many modern problems, such as gene pathway selection and graphical model estimation. In this paper, we propose a separable penalty as an approximation of the overlap** group lasso penalty. Thanks to the separability, the computation of regularization based on our penalty is substantially faster than that of the overlap** group lasso, especially for large-scale and high-dimensional problems. We show that the penalty is the tightest separable relaxation of the overlap** group lasso norm within the family of $\ell_{q_1}/\ell_{q_2}$ norms. Moreover, we show that the estimator based on the proposed separable penalty is statistically equivalent to the one based on the overlap** group lasso penalty with respect to their error bounds and the rate-optimal performance under the squared loss. We demonstrate the faster computational time and statistical equivalence of our method compared with the overlap** group lasso in simulation examples and a classification problem of cancer tumors based on gene expression and multiple gene pathways.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2024; v1 submitted 16 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Integrated Conditional Estimation-Optimization
Authors:
Meng Qi,
Paul Grigas,
Zuo-Jun Max Shen
Abstract:
Many real-world optimization problems involve uncertain parameters with probability distributions that can be estimated using contextual feature information. In contrast to the standard approach of first estimating the distribution of uncertain parameters and then optimizing the objective based on the estimation, we propose an integrated conditional estimation-optimization (ICEO) framework that es…
▽ More
Many real-world optimization problems involve uncertain parameters with probability distributions that can be estimated using contextual feature information. In contrast to the standard approach of first estimating the distribution of uncertain parameters and then optimizing the objective based on the estimation, we propose an integrated conditional estimation-optimization (ICEO) framework that estimates the underlying conditional distribution of the random parameter while considering the structure of the optimization problem. We directly model the relationship between the conditional distribution of the random parameter and the contextual features, and then estimate the probabilistic model with an objective that aligns with the downstream optimization problem. We show that our ICEO approach is asymptotically consistent under moderate regularity conditions and further provide finite performance guarantees in the form of generalization bounds. Computationally, performing estimation with the ICEO approach is a non-convex and often non-differentiable optimization problem. We propose a general methodology for approximating the potentially non-differentiable map** from estimated conditional distribution to the optimal decision by a differentiable function, which greatly improves the performance of gradient-based algorithms applied to the non-convex problem. We also provide a polynomial optimization solution approach in the semi-algebraic case. Numerical experiments are also conducted to show the empirical success of our approach in different situations including with limited data samples and model mismatches.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2023; v1 submitted 24 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Exploring Uncertainty in Deep Learning for Construction of Prediction Intervals
Authors:
Yuandu Lai,
Yucheng Shi,
Yahong Han,
Yunfeng Shao,
Meiyu Qi,
Bingshuai Li
Abstract:
Deep learning has achieved impressive performance on many tasks in recent years. However, it has been found that it is still not enough for deep neural networks to provide only point estimates. For high-risk tasks, we need to assess the reliability of the model predictions. This requires us to quantify the uncertainty of model prediction and construct prediction intervals. In this paper, We explor…
▽ More
Deep learning has achieved impressive performance on many tasks in recent years. However, it has been found that it is still not enough for deep neural networks to provide only point estimates. For high-risk tasks, we need to assess the reliability of the model predictions. This requires us to quantify the uncertainty of model prediction and construct prediction intervals. In this paper, We explore the uncertainty in deep learning to construct the prediction intervals. In general, We comprehensively consider two categories of uncertainties: aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty. We design a special loss function, which enables us to learn uncertainty without uncertainty label. We only need to supervise the learning of regression task. We learn the aleatory uncertainty implicitly from the loss function. And that epistemic uncertainty is accounted for in ensembled form. Our method correlates the construction of prediction intervals with the uncertainty estimation. Impressive results on some publicly available datasets show that the performance of our method is competitive with other state-of-the-art methods.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Making Study Populations Visible through Knowledge Graphs
Authors:
Shruthi Chari,
Miao Qi,
Nkcheniyere N. Agu,
Oshani Seneviratne,
James P. McCusker,
Kristin P. Bennett,
Amar K. Das,
Deborah L. McGuinness
Abstract:
Treatment recommendations within Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are largely based on findings from clinical trials and case studies, referred to here as research studies, that are often based on highly selective clinical populations, referred to here as study cohorts. When medical practitioners apply CPG recommendations, they need to understand how well their patient population matches the ch…
▽ More
Treatment recommendations within Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are largely based on findings from clinical trials and case studies, referred to here as research studies, that are often based on highly selective clinical populations, referred to here as study cohorts. When medical practitioners apply CPG recommendations, they need to understand how well their patient population matches the characteristics of those in the study cohort, and thus are confronted with the challenges of locating the study cohort information and making an analytic comparison. To address these challenges, we develop an ontology-enabled prototype system, which exposes the population descriptions in research studies in a declarative manner, with the ultimate goal of allowing medical practitioners to better understand the applicability and generalizability of treatment recommendations. We build a Study Cohort Ontology (SCO) to encode the vocabulary of study population descriptions, that are often reported in the first table in the published work, thus they are often referred to as Table 1. We leverage the well-used Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO) for defining property associations between classes. Further, we model the key components of Table 1s, i.e., collections of study subjects, subject characteristics, and statistical measures in RDF knowledge graphs. We design scenarios for medical practitioners to perform population analysis, and generate cohort similarity visualizations to determine the applicability of a study population to the clinical population of interest. Our semantic approach to make study populations visible, by standardized representations of Table 1s, allows users to quickly derive clinically relevant inferences about study populations.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
