-
Bayesian inference for transportation origin-destination matrices: the Poisson-inverse Gaussian and other Poisson mixtures
Authors:
Konstantinos Perrakis,
Dimitris Karlis,
Mario Cools,
Davy Janssens
Abstract:
In this paper we present Poisson mixture approaches for origin-destination (OD) modeling in transportation analysis. We introduce covariate-based models which incorporate different transport modeling phases and also allow for direct probabilistic inference on link traffic based on Bayesian predictions. Emphasis is placed on the Poisson-inverse Gaussian as an alternative to the commonly-used Poisso…
▽ More
In this paper we present Poisson mixture approaches for origin-destination (OD) modeling in transportation analysis. We introduce covariate-based models which incorporate different transport modeling phases and also allow for direct probabilistic inference on link traffic based on Bayesian predictions. Emphasis is placed on the Poisson-inverse Gaussian as an alternative to the commonly-used Poisson-gamma and Poisson-lognormal models. We present a first full Bayesian formulation and demonstrate that the Poisson-inverse Gaussian is particularly suited for OD analysis due to desirable marginal and hierarchical properties. In addition, the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) is considered as an alternative to Markov chain Monte Carlo and the two methodologies are compared under specific modeling assumptions. The case study is based on 2001 Belgian census data and focuses on a large, sparsely-distributed OD matrix containing trip information for 308 Flemish municipalities.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Regularized joint mixture models
Authors:
Konstantinos Perrakis,
Thomas Lartigue,
Frank Dondelinger,
Sach Mukherjee
Abstract:
Regularized regression models are well studied and, under appropriate conditions, offer fast and statistically interpretable results. However, large data in many applications are heterogeneous in the sense of harboring distributional differences between latent groups. Then, the assumption that the conditional distribution of response Y given features X is the same for all samples may not hold. Fur…
▽ More
Regularized regression models are well studied and, under appropriate conditions, offer fast and statistically interpretable results. However, large data in many applications are heterogeneous in the sense of harboring distributional differences between latent groups. Then, the assumption that the conditional distribution of response Y given features X is the same for all samples may not hold. Furthermore, in scientific applications, the covariance structure of the features may contain important signals and its learning is also affected by latent group structure. We propose a class of mixture models for paired data (X, Y) that couples together the distribution of X (using sparse graphical models) and the conditional Y | X (using sparse regression models). The regression and graphical models are specific to the latent groups and model parameters are estimated jointly (hence the name "regularized joint mixtures"). This allows signals in either or both of the feature distribution and regression model to inform learning of latent structure and provides automatic control of confounding by such structure. Estimation is handled via an expectation-maximization algorithm, whose convergence is established theoretically. We illustrate the key ideas via empirical examples. An R package is available at https://github.com/k-perrakis/regjmix.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2022; v1 submitted 21 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Scalable Bayesian regression in high dimensions with multiple data sources
Authors:
Konstantinos Perrakis,
Sach Mukherjee,
the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Abstract:
Applications of high-dimensional regression often involve multiple sources or types of covariates. We propose methodology for this setting, emphasizing the "wide data" regime with large total dimensionality p and sample size n<<p. We focus on a flexible ridge-type prior with shrinkage levels that are specific to each data type or source and that are set automatically by empirical Bayes. All estima…
▽ More
Applications of high-dimensional regression often involve multiple sources or types of covariates. We propose methodology for this setting, emphasizing the "wide data" regime with large total dimensionality p and sample size n<<p. We focus on a flexible ridge-type prior with shrinkage levels that are specific to each data type or source and that are set automatically by empirical Bayes. All estimation, including setting of shrinkage levels, is formulated mainly in terms of inner product matrices of size n x n. This renders computation efficient in the wide data regime and allows scaling to problems with millions of features. Furthermore, the proposed procedures are free of user-set tuning parameters. We show how sparsity can be achieved by post-processing of the Bayesian output via constrained minimization of a certain Kullback-Leibler divergence. This yields sparse solutions with adaptive, source-specific shrinkage, including a closed-form variant that scales to very large p. We present empirical results from a simulation study based on real data and a case study in Alzheimer's disease involving millions of features and multiple data sources.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2019; v1 submitted 2 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Variations of Power-Expected-Posterior Priors in Normal Regression Models
Authors:
Dimitris Fouskakis,
Ioannis Ntzoufras,
Konstantinos Perrakis
Abstract:
The power-expected-posterior (PEP) prior is an objective prior for Gaussian linear models, which leads to consistent model selection inference, under the M-closed scenario, and tends to favor parsimonious models. Recently, two new forms of the PEP prior were proposed which generalize its applicability to a wider range of models. The properties of these two PEP variants within the context of the no…
▽ More
The power-expected-posterior (PEP) prior is an objective prior for Gaussian linear models, which leads to consistent model selection inference, under the M-closed scenario, and tends to favor parsimonious models. Recently, two new forms of the PEP prior were proposed which generalize its applicability to a wider range of models. The properties of these two PEP variants within the context of the normal linear model are examined thoroughly, focusing on the prior dispersion and on the consistency of the induced model selection procedure. Results show that both PEP variants have larger variances than the unit-information g-prior and that they are M-closed consistent as the limiting behavior of the corresponding marginal likelihoods matches that of the BIC. The consistency under the M-open case, using three different model misspecification scenarios is further investigated.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2019; v1 submitted 22 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Power-Expected-Posterior Priors for Generalized Linear Models
Authors:
Dimitris Fouskakis,
Ioannis Ntzoufras,
Konstantinos Perrakis
Abstract:
The power-expected-posterior (PEP) prior provides an objective, automatic, consistent and parsimonious model selection procedure. At the same time it resolves the conceptual and computational problems due to the use of imaginary data. Namely, (i) it dispenses with the need to select and average across all possible minimal imaginary samples, and (ii) it diminishes the effect that the imaginary data…
▽ More
The power-expected-posterior (PEP) prior provides an objective, automatic, consistent and parsimonious model selection procedure. At the same time it resolves the conceptual and computational problems due to the use of imaginary data. Namely, (i) it dispenses with the need to select and average across all possible minimal imaginary samples, and (ii) it diminishes the effect that the imaginary data have upon the posterior distribution. These attributes allow for large sample approximations, when needed, in order to reduce the computational burden under more complex models. In this work we generalize the applicability of the PEP methodology, focusing on the framework of generalized linear models (GLMs), by introducing two new PEP definitions which are in effect applicable to any general model setting. Hyper-prior extensions for the power parameter that regulates the contribution of the imaginary data are introduced. We further study the validity of the predictive matching and of the model selection consistency, providing analytical proofs for the former and empirical evidence supporting the latter. For estimation of posterior model and inclusion probabilities we introduce a tuning-free Gibbs-based variable selection sampler. Several simulation scenarios and one real life example are considered in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods compared to other commonly used approaches based on mixtures of g-priors. Results indicate that the GLM-PEP priors are more effective in the identification of sparse and parsimonious model formulations.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2017; v1 submitted 4 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
On the use of marginal posteriors in marginal likelihood estimation via importance-sampling
Authors:
K. Perrakis,
I. Ntzoufras,
E. G. Tsionas
Abstract:
We investigate the efficiency of a marginal likelihood estimator where the product of the marginal posterior distributions is used as an importance-sampling function. The approach is generally applicable to multi-block parameter vector settings, does not require additional Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling and is not dependent on the type of MCMC scheme used to sample from the posterior. Th…
▽ More
We investigate the efficiency of a marginal likelihood estimator where the product of the marginal posterior distributions is used as an importance-sampling function. The approach is generally applicable to multi-block parameter vector settings, does not require additional Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling and is not dependent on the type of MCMC scheme used to sample from the posterior. The proposed approach is applied to normal regression models, finite normal mixtures and longitudinal Poisson models, and leads to accurate marginal likelihood estimates.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2014; v1 submitted 4 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
