-
VARX Granger Analysis: Modeling, Inference, and Applications
Authors:
Lucas C. Parra,
Aimar Silvan Ortubay,
Maximilian Nentwich,
Jens Madsen,
Behtash Babadi
Abstract:
Complex systems, such as brains, markets, and societies, exhibit internal dynamics influenced by external factors. Disentangling delayed external effects from internal dynamics within these systems is often challenging. We propose using a Vector Autoregressive model with eXogenous input (VARX) to capture delayed interactions between internal and external variables. While this model aligns with Gra…
▽ More
Complex systems, such as brains, markets, and societies, exhibit internal dynamics influenced by external factors. Disentangling delayed external effects from internal dynamics within these systems is often challenging. We propose using a Vector Autoregressive model with eXogenous input (VARX) to capture delayed interactions between internal and external variables. While this model aligns with Granger's statistical formalism for testing "causal relations", the connection between the two is not widely understood. Here, we bridge this gap by providing fundamental equations, user-friendly code, and demonstrations using simulated and real-world data from neuroscience, physiology, sociology, and economics. Our examples illustrate how the model avoids spurious correlation by factoring out external influences from internal dynamics, leading to more parsimonious explanations of the systems. We also provide methods for enhancing model efficiency, such as L2 regularization for limited data and basis functions to cope with extended delays. Additionally, we analyze model performance under various scenarios where model assumptions are violated. MATLAB, Python, and R code are provided for easy adoption: https://github.com/lcparra/varx
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2024; v1 submitted 16 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Radiologist-level Performance by Using Deep Learning for Segmentation of Breast Cancers on MRI Scans
Authors:
Lukas Hirsch,
Yu Huang,
Shaojun Luo,
Carolina Rossi Saccarelli,
Roberto Lo Gullo,
Isaac Daimiel Naranjo,
Almir G. V. Bitencourt,
Natsuko Onishi,
Eun Sook Ko,
Doris Leithner,
Daly Avendano,
Sarah Eskreis-Winkler,
Mary Hughes,
Danny F. Martinez,
Katja Pinker,
Krishna Juluru,
Amin E. El-Rowmeim,
Pierre Elnajjar,
Elizabeth A. Morris,
Hernan A. Makse,
Lucas C Parra,
Elizabeth J. Sutton
Abstract:
Purpose: To develop a deep network architecture that would achieve fully automated radiologist-level segmentation of cancers at breast MRI.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 38229 examinations (composed of 64063 individual breast scans from 14475 patients) were performed in female patients (age range, 12-94 years; mean age, 52 years +/- 10 [standard deviation]) who presented betw…
▽ More
Purpose: To develop a deep network architecture that would achieve fully automated radiologist-level segmentation of cancers at breast MRI.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 38229 examinations (composed of 64063 individual breast scans from 14475 patients) were performed in female patients (age range, 12-94 years; mean age, 52 years +/- 10 [standard deviation]) who presented between 2002 and 2014 at a single clinical site. A total of 2555 breast cancers were selected that had been segmented on two-dimensional (2D) images by radiologists, as well as 60108 benign breasts that served as examples of noncancerous tissue; all these were used for model training. For testing, an additional 250 breast cancers were segmented independently on 2D images by four radiologists. Authors selected among several three-dimensional (3D) deep convolutional neural network architectures, input modalities, and harmonization methods. The outcome measure was the Dice score for 2D segmentation, which was compared between the network and radiologists by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the two one-sided test procedure.
Results: The highest-performing network on the training set was a 3D U-Net with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as input and with intensity normalized for each examination. In the test set, the median Dice score of this network was 0.77 (interquartile range, 0.26). The performance of the network was equivalent to that of the radiologists (two one-sided test procedures with radiologist performance of 0.69-0.84 as equivalence bounds, P <= .001 for both; n = 250).
Conclusion: When trained on a sufficiently large dataset, the developed 3D U-Net performed as well as fellowship-trained radiologists in detailed 2D segmentation of breast cancers at routine clinical MRI.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2022; v1 submitted 21 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Segmentation of MRI head anatomy using deep volumetric networks and multiple spatial priors
Authors:
Lukas Hirsch,
Yu Huang,
Lucas C Parra
Abstract:
Purpose: Conventional automated segmentation of the head anatomy in MRI distinguishes different brain and non-brain tissues based on image intensities and prior tissue probability maps (TPM). This works well for normal head anatomies, but fails in the presence of unexpected lesions. Deep convolutional neural networks leverage instead spatial patterns and can learn to segment lesions, but often ign…
▽ More
Purpose: Conventional automated segmentation of the head anatomy in MRI distinguishes different brain and non-brain tissues based on image intensities and prior tissue probability maps (TPM). This works well for normal head anatomies, but fails in the presence of unexpected lesions. Deep convolutional neural networks leverage instead spatial patterns and can learn to segment lesions, but often ignore prior probabilities. Approach: We add three sources of prior information to a three-dimensional convolutional network, namely, spatial priors with a TPM, morphological priors with conditional random fields, and spatial context with a wider field-of-view at lower resolution. We train and test these networks on 3D images of 43 stroke patients and 4 healthy individuals which have been manually segmented. Results: We demonstrate the benefits of each sources of prior information, and we show that the new architecture, which we call Multiprior network, improves the performance of existing segmentation software, such as SPM, FSL, and DeepMedic for abnormal anatomies. The relevance of the different priors was compared and the TPM was found to be most beneficial. The benefit of adding a TPM is generic in that it can boost the performance of established segmentation networks such as the DeepMedic and a UNet. We also provide an out-of-sample validation and clinical application of the approach on an additional 47 patients with disorders of consciousness. We make the code and trained networks freely available. Conclusions: Biomedical images follow imaging protocols that can be leveraged as prior information into deep convolutional neural networks to improve performance. The network segmentations match human manual corrections performed in 3D, and are comparable in performance to human segmentations obtained from scratch in 2D for abnormal brain anatomies.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2021; v1 submitted 23 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Multi-set Canonical Correlation Analysis simply explained
Authors:
Lucas C Parra
Abstract:
There are a multitude of methods to perform multi-set correlated component analysis (MCCA), including some that require iterative solutions. The methods differ on the criterion they optimize and the constraints placed on the solutions. This note focuses perhaps on the simplest version, which can be solved in a single step as the eigenvectors of matrix ${\bf D}^{-1} {\bf R}$. Here ${\bf R}$ is the…
▽ More
There are a multitude of methods to perform multi-set correlated component analysis (MCCA), including some that require iterative solutions. The methods differ on the criterion they optimize and the constraints placed on the solutions. This note focuses perhaps on the simplest version, which can be solved in a single step as the eigenvectors of matrix ${\bf D}^{-1} {\bf R}$. Here ${\bf R}$ is the covariance matrix of the concatenated data, and ${\bf D}$ is its block-diagonal. This note shows that this solution maximizes inter-set correlation (ISC) without further constraints. It also relates the solution to a two step procedure, which first whitens each dataset using PCA, and then performs an additional PCA on the concatenated and whitened data. Both these solutions are known, although a clear derivation and simple implementation are hard to find. This short note aims to remedy this.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Correlated Components Analysis - Extracting Reliable Dimensions in Multivariate Data
Authors:
Lucas C. Parra,
Stefan Haufe,
Jacek P. Dmochowski
Abstract:
How does one find dimensions in multivariate data that are reliably expressed across repetitions? For example, in a brain imaging study one may want to identify combinations of neural signals that are reliably expressed across multiple trials or subjects. For a behavioral assessment with multiple ratings, one may want to identify an aggregate score that is reliably reproduced across raters. Correl…
▽ More
How does one find dimensions in multivariate data that are reliably expressed across repetitions? For example, in a brain imaging study one may want to identify combinations of neural signals that are reliably expressed across multiple trials or subjects. For a behavioral assessment with multiple ratings, one may want to identify an aggregate score that is reliably reproduced across raters. Correlated Components Analysis (CorrCA) addresses this problem by identifying components that are maximally correlated between repetitions (e.g. trials, subjects, raters). Here we formalize this as the maximization of the ratio of between-repetition to within-repetition covariance. We show that this criterion maximizes repeat-reliability, defined as mean over variance across repeats, and that it leads to CorrCA or to multi-set Canonical Correlation Analysis, depending on the constraints. Surprisingly, we also find that CorrCA is equivalent to Linear Discriminant Analysis for zero-mean signals, which provides an unexpected link between classic concepts of multivariate analysis. We present an exact parametric test of statistical significance based on the F-statistic for normally distributed independent samples, and present and validate shuffle statistics for the case of dependent samples. Regularization and extension to non-linear map**s using kernels are also presented. The algorithms are demonstrated on a series of data analysis applications, and we provide all code and data required to reproduce the results.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2019; v1 submitted 26 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
EEG in the classroom: Synchronised neural recordings during video presentation
Authors:
Andreas Trier Poulsen,
Simon Kamronn,
Jacek Dmochowski,
Lucas C. Parra,
Lars Kai Hansen
Abstract:
We performed simultaneous recordings of electroencephalography (EEG) from multiple students in a classroom, and measured the inter-subject correlation (ISC) of activity evoked by a common video stimulus. The neural reliability, as quantified by ISC, has been linked to engagement and attentional modulation in earlier studies that used high-grade equipment in laboratory settings. Here we reproduce m…
▽ More
We performed simultaneous recordings of electroencephalography (EEG) from multiple students in a classroom, and measured the inter-subject correlation (ISC) of activity evoked by a common video stimulus. The neural reliability, as quantified by ISC, has been linked to engagement and attentional modulation in earlier studies that used high-grade equipment in laboratory settings. Here we reproduce many of the results from these studies using portable low-cost equipment, focusing on the robustness of using ISC for subjects experiencing naturalistic stimuli. The present data shows that stimulus-evoked neural responses, known to be modulated by attention, can be tracked in for groups of students with synchronized EEG acquisition. This is a step towards real-time inference of engagement in the classroom.
△ Less
Submitted 27 December, 2016; v1 submitted 11 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.