Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Oakley, J E

Calibrating cardiac electrophysiology models using latent Gaussian processes on atrial manifolds

Authors: Sam Coveney, Caroline H Roney, Cesare Corrado, Richard D Wilkinson, Jeremy E Oakley, Steven A Niederer, Richard H Clayton

Abstract: Models of electrical excitation and recovery in the heart have become increasingly detailed, but have yet to be used routinely in the clinical setting to guide personalized intervention in patients. One of the main challenges is calibrating models from the limited measurements that can be made in a patient during a standard clinical procedure. In this work, we propose a novel framework for the pro… ▽ More Models of electrical excitation and recovery in the heart have become increasingly detailed, but have yet to be used routinely in the clinical setting to guide personalized intervention in patients. One of the main challenges is calibrating models from the limited measurements that can be made in a patient during a standard clinical procedure. In this work, we propose a novel framework for the probabilistic calibration of electrophysiology parameters on the left atrium of the heart using local measurements of cardiac excitability. Parameter fields are represented as Gaussian processes on manifolds and are linked to measurements via surrogate functions that map from local parameter values to measurements. The posterior distribution of parameter fields is then obtained. We show that our method can recover parameter fields used to generate localised synthetic measurements of effective refractory period. Our methodology is applicable to other measurement types collected with clinical protocols, and more generally for calibration where model parameters vary over a manifold. △ Less

Submitted 15 September, 2022; v1 submitted 8 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 14 pages, 6 figures, preprint

Gaussian Process Manifold Interpolation for Probabilistic Atrial Activation Maps and Uncertain Conduction Velocity

Authors: Sam Coveney, Cesare Corrado, Caroline H Roney, Daniel O'Hare, Steven E Williams, Mark D O'Neill, Steven A Niederer, Richard H Clayton, Jeremy E Oakley, Richard D Wilkinson

Abstract: In patients with atrial fibrillation, local activation time (LAT) maps are routinely used for characterising patient pathophysiology. The gradient of LAT maps can be used to calculate conduction velocity (CV), which directly relates to material conductivity and may provide an important measure of atrial substrate properties. Including uncertainty in CV calculations would help with interpreting the… ▽ More In patients with atrial fibrillation, local activation time (LAT) maps are routinely used for characterising patient pathophysiology. The gradient of LAT maps can be used to calculate conduction velocity (CV), which directly relates to material conductivity and may provide an important measure of atrial substrate properties. Including uncertainty in CV calculations would help with interpreting the reliability of these measurements. Here, we build upon a recent insight into reduced-rank Gaussian processes (GP) to perform probabilistic interpolation of uncertain LAT directly on human atrial manifolds. Our Gaussian Process Manifold Interpolation (GPMI) method accounts for the topology of the atria, and allows for calculation of statistics for predicted CV. We demonstrate our method on two clinical cases, and perform validation against a simulated ground truth. CV uncertainty depends on data density, wave propagation direction, and CV magnitude. GPMI is suitable for probabilistic interpolation of other uncertain quantities on non-Euclidean manifolds. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2020; v1 submitted 22 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Incorporating genuine prior information about between-study heterogeneity in random effects pairwise and network meta-analyses

Authors: Shijie Ren, Jeremy E. Oakley, John W. Stevens

Abstract: Background: Pairwise and network meta-analyses using fixed effect and random effects models are commonly applied to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials. The models differ in their assumptions and the interpretation of the results. The model choice depends on the objective of the analysis and knowledge of the included studies. Fixed effect models are often used because there are t… ▽ More Background: Pairwise and network meta-analyses using fixed effect and random effects models are commonly applied to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials. The models differ in their assumptions and the interpretation of the results. The model choice depends on the objective of the analysis and knowledge of the included studies. Fixed effect models are often used because there are too few studies with which to estimate the between-study standard deviation from the data alone. Objectives: The aim is to propose a framework for eliciting an informative prior distribution for the between-study standard deviation in a Bayesian random effects meta-analysis model to genuinely represent heterogeneity when data are sparse. Methods: We developed an elicitation method using external information such as empirical evidence and experts' beliefs on the 'range' of treatment effects in order to infer the prior distribution for the between-study standard deviation. We also developed the method to be implemented in R. Results: The three-stage elicitation approach allows uncertainty to be represented by a genuine prior distribution to avoid making misleading inferences. It is flexible to what judgments an expert can provide, and is applicable to all types of outcome measure for which a treatment effect can be constructed on an additive scale. Conclusions: The choice between using a fixed effect or random effects meta-analysis model depends on the inferences required and not on the number of available studies. Our elicitation framework captures external evidence about heterogeneity and overcomes the often implausible assumption that studies are estimating the same treatment effect, thereby improving the quality of inferences in decision making. △ Less

Submitted 3 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Assurance for clinical trial design with normally distributed outcomes: eliciting uncertainty about variances

Authors: Ziyad A. Alhussain, Jeremy E. Oakley

Abstract: The assurance method is growing in popularity in clinical trial planning. The method involves eliciting a prior distribution for the treatment effect, and then calculating the probability that a proposed trial will produce a `successful' outcome. For normally distributed observations, uncertainty about the variance of the normal distribution also needs to be accounted for, but there is little guid… ▽ More The assurance method is growing in popularity in clinical trial planning. The method involves eliciting a prior distribution for the treatment effect, and then calculating the probability that a proposed trial will produce a `successful' outcome. For normally distributed observations, uncertainty about the variance of the normal distribution also needs to be accounted for, but there is little guidance in the literature on how to elicit a distribution for a variance parameter. We present a simple elicitation method, and illustrate how the elicited distribution is incorporated within an assurance calculation. We also consider multi-stage trials, where a decision to proceed with a larger trial will follow from the outcome of a smaller trial; we illustrate the role of the elicted distribution in assessing the information provided by a proposed smaller trial. Free software is available for implementing our methods. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2019; v1 submitted 3 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Comments: The previous version of this paper had the title "Eliciting judgements about uncertain population means and variances". The elicitation methods in this paper are unchanged from the previous version. The motivation for the methods has changed, and the scope of the paper has been widened, to show the application of the elicitation methods within the assurance method for clinical trial planning

Calibration of Complex Computer Simulators using Likelihood Emulation

Authors: Jeremy E. Oakley, Benjamin D. Youngman

Abstract: We calibrate a Natural History Model, which is a class of computer simulator used in the health industry, and here has been used to characterise bowel cancer incidence for the UK. The simulator tracks the development of bowel cancer in a sample of people, and its output mostly stratifies bowel cancer occurrence by patient age and bowel cancer type. Its output relies on 25 unknown inputs, which we… ▽ More We calibrate a Natural History Model, which is a class of computer simulator used in the health industry, and here has been used to characterise bowel cancer incidence for the UK. The simulator tracks the development of bowel cancer in a sample of people, and its output mostly stratifies bowel cancer occurrence by patient age and bowel cancer type. Its output relies on 25 unknown inputs, which we are required to calibrate. In order to do this we must address that not only is the output count data, but it is also stochastic, due to the simulation procedure. We cannot feasibly achieve calibration of the simulator using Monte Carlo methods alone, as it is of `moderate' computational expense. To achieve a reliable calibration, we must also specify its discrepancy: how, when calibrated, it differs from reality. We propose a method for calibration that combines a statistical emulator for the likelihood function with importance sampling. The emulator provides an interim sample of inputs at which the simulator is run, from which the likelihood is calculated. Importance sampling is then used to re-weight the inputs and provide a final sample of calibrated inputs. Re-calculating the importance weights incurs little computational cost, and so we can easily investigate how different discrepancy specifications affect calibration. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2014; v1 submitted 20 March, 2014; originally announced March 2014.