Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Nobre, W S

The impact of directly observed therapy on the efficacy of Tuberculosis treatment: A Bayesian multilevel approach

Authors: Widemberg S. Nobre, Alexandra M. Schmidt, Erica E. M. Moodie, David A. Stephens

Abstract: We propose and discuss a Bayesian procedure to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) for multilevel observations in the presence of confounding. We focus on situations where the confounders may be latent (e.g., spatial latent effects). This work is motivated by an interest in determining the causal impact of directly observed therapy (DOT) on the successful treatment of Tuberculosis (TB); th… ▽ More We propose and discuss a Bayesian procedure to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) for multilevel observations in the presence of confounding. We focus on situations where the confounders may be latent (e.g., spatial latent effects). This work is motivated by an interest in determining the causal impact of directly observed therapy (DOT) on the successful treatment of Tuberculosis (TB); the available data correspond to individual-level information observed across different cities in a state in Brazil. We focus on propensity score regression and covariate adjustment to balance the treatment (DOT) allocation. We discuss the need to include latent local-level random effects in the propensity score model to reduce bias in the estimation of the ATE. A simulation study suggests that accounting for the multilevel nature of the data with latent structures in both the outcome and propensity score models has the potential to reduce bias in the estimation of causal effects. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Causal inference under mis-specification: adjustment based on the propensity score

Authors: David A. Stephens, Widemberg S. Nobre, Erica E. M. Moodie, Alexandra M. Schmidt

Abstract: We study Bayesian approaches to causal inference via propensity score regression. Much of the Bayesian literature on propensity score methods have relied on approaches that cannot be viewed as fully Bayesian in the context of conventional `likelihood times prior' posterior inference; in addition, most methods rely on parametric and distributional assumptions, and presumed correct specification. We… ▽ More We study Bayesian approaches to causal inference via propensity score regression. Much of the Bayesian literature on propensity score methods have relied on approaches that cannot be viewed as fully Bayesian in the context of conventional `likelihood times prior' posterior inference; in addition, most methods rely on parametric and distributional assumptions, and presumed correct specification. We emphasize that causal inference is typically carried out in settings of mis-specification, and develop strategies for fully Bayesian inference that reflect this. We focus on methods based on decision-theoretic arguments, and show how inference based on loss-minimization can give valid and fully Bayesian inference. We propose a computational approach to inference based on the Bayesian bootstrap which has good Bayesian and frequentist properties. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.