-
CAPITAL: Optimal Subgroup Identification via Constrained Policy Tree Search
Authors:
Hengrui Cai,
Wenbin Lu,
Rachel Marceau West,
Devan V. Mehrotra,
Lingkang Huang
Abstract:
Personalized medicine, a paradigm of medicine tailored to a patient's characteristics, is an increasingly attractive field in health care. An important goal of personalized medicine is to identify a subgroup of patients, based on baseline covariates, that benefits more from the targeted treatment than other comparative treatments. Most of the current subgroup identification methods only focus on o…
▽ More
Personalized medicine, a paradigm of medicine tailored to a patient's characteristics, is an increasingly attractive field in health care. An important goal of personalized medicine is to identify a subgroup of patients, based on baseline covariates, that benefits more from the targeted treatment than other comparative treatments. Most of the current subgroup identification methods only focus on obtaining a subgroup with an enhanced treatment effect without paying attention to subgroup size. Yet, a clinically meaningful subgroup learning approach should identify the maximum number of patients who can benefit from the better treatment. In this paper, we present an optimal subgroup selection rule (SSR) that maximizes the number of selected patients, and in the meantime, achieves the pre-specified clinically meaningful mean outcome, such as the average treatment effect. We derive two equivalent theoretical forms of the optimal SSR based on the contrast function that describes the treatment-covariates interaction in the outcome. We further propose a ConstrAined PolIcy Tree seArch aLgorithm (CAPITAL) to find the optimal SSR within the interpretable decision tree class. The proposed method is flexible to handle multiple constraints that penalize the inclusion of patients with negative treatment effects, and to address time to event data using the restricted mean survival time as the clinically interesting mean outcome. Extensive simulations, comparison studies, and real data applications are conducted to demonstrate the validity and utility of our method.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2023; v1 submitted 11 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
CauchyCP: a powerful test under non-proportional hazards using Cauchy combination of change-point Cox regressions
Authors:
Hong Zhang,
Qing Li,
Devan V. Mehrotra,
Judong Shen
Abstract:
Non-proportional hazards data are routinely encountered in randomized clinical trials. In such cases, classic Cox proportional hazards model can suffer from severe power loss, with difficulty in interpretation of the estimated hazard ratio since the treatment effect varies over time. We propose CauchyCP, an omnibus test of change-point Cox regression models, to overcome both challenges while detec…
▽ More
Non-proportional hazards data are routinely encountered in randomized clinical trials. In such cases, classic Cox proportional hazards model can suffer from severe power loss, with difficulty in interpretation of the estimated hazard ratio since the treatment effect varies over time. We propose CauchyCP, an omnibus test of change-point Cox regression models, to overcome both challenges while detecting signals of non-proportional hazards patterns. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate that, compared to existing treatment comparison tests under non-proportional hazards, the proposed CauchyCP test 1) controls the type I error better at small $α$ levels ($< 0.01$); 2) increases the power of detecting time-varying effects; and 3) is more computationally efficient. The superior performance of CauchyCP is further illustrated using retrospective analyses of two randomized clinical trial datasets and a pharmacogenetic biomarker study dataset. The R package $\textit{CauchyCP}$ is publicly available on CRAN.
△ Less
Submitted 31 December, 2020;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Principal Stratum Strategy: Potential Role in Drug Development
Authors:
Björn Bornkamp,
Kaspar Rufibach,
Jianchang Lin,
Yi Liu,
Devan V. Mehrotra,
Satrajit Roychoudhury,
Heinz Schmidli,
Yue Shentu,
Marcel Wolbers
Abstract:
A randomized trial allows estimation of the causal effect of an intervention compared to a control in the overall population and in subpopulations defined by baseline characteristics. Often, however, clinical questions also arise regarding the treatment effect in subpopulations of patients, which would experience clinical or disease related events post-randomization. Events that occur after treatm…
▽ More
A randomized trial allows estimation of the causal effect of an intervention compared to a control in the overall population and in subpopulations defined by baseline characteristics. Often, however, clinical questions also arise regarding the treatment effect in subpopulations of patients, which would experience clinical or disease related events post-randomization. Events that occur after treatment initiation and potentially affect the interpretation or the existence of the measurements are called {\it intercurrent events} in the ICH E9(R1) guideline. If the intercurrent event is a consequence of treatment, randomization alone is no longer sufficient to meaningfully estimate the treatment effect. Analyses comparing the subgroups of patients without the intercurrent events for intervention and control will not estimate a causal effect. This is well known, but post-hoc analyses of this kind are commonly performed in drug development. An alternative approach is the principal stratum strategy, which classifies subjects according to their potential occurrence of an intercurrent event on both study arms. We illustrate with examples that questions formulated through principal strata occur naturally in drug development and argue that approaching these questions with the ICH E9(R1) estimand framework has the potential to lead to more transparent assumptions as well as more adequate analyses and conclusions. In addition, we provide an overview of assumptions required for estimation of effects in principal strata. Most of these assumptions are unverifiable and should hence be based on solid scientific understanding. Sensitivity analyses are needed to assess robustness of conclusions.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2021; v1 submitted 12 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Survival Analysis Using a 5-Step Stratified Testing and Amalgamation Routine in Randomized Clinical Trials
Authors:
Devan V. Mehrotra,
Rachel Marceau West
Abstract:
Randomized clinical trials are often designed to assess whether a test treatment prolongs survival relative to a control treatment. Increased patient heterogeneity, while desirable for generalizability of results, can weaken the ability of common statistical approaches to detect treatment differences, potentially hampering the regulatory approval of safe and efficacious therapies. A novel solution…
▽ More
Randomized clinical trials are often designed to assess whether a test treatment prolongs survival relative to a control treatment. Increased patient heterogeneity, while desirable for generalizability of results, can weaken the ability of common statistical approaches to detect treatment differences, potentially hampering the regulatory approval of safe and efficacious therapies. A novel solution to this problem is proposed. A list of baseline covariates that have the potential to be prognostic for survival under either treatment is pre-specified in the analysis plan. At the analysis stage, using all observed survival times but blinded to patient-level treatment assignment, 'noise' covariates are removed with elastic net Cox regression. The shortened covariate list is used by a conditional inference tree algorithm to segment the heterogeneous trial population into subpopulations of prognostically homogeneous patients (risk strata). After patient-level treatment unblinding, a treatment comparison is done within each formed risk stratum and stratum-level results are combined for overall statistical inference. The impressive power-boosting performance of our proposed 5-step stratified testing and amalgamation routine (5-STAR), relative to that of the logrank test and other common approaches that do not leverage inherently structured patient heterogeneity, is illustrated using a hypothetical and two real datasets along with simulation results. Furthermore, the importance of reporting stratum-level comparative treatment effects (time ratios from accelerated failure time model fits in conjunction with model averaging and, as needed, hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazard model fits) is highlighted as a potential enabler of personalized medicine. A fiveSTAR R package is available at https://github.com/rmarceauwest/fiveSTAR.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
PRISM: Patient Response Identifiers for Stratified Medicine
Authors:
Thomas O. Jemielita,
Devan V. Mehrotra
Abstract:
Pharmaceutical companies continue to seek innovative ways to explore whether a drug under development is likely to be suitable for all or only an identifiable stratum of patients in the target population. The sooner this can be done during the clinical development process, the better it is for the company, and downstream for prescribers, payers, and most importantly, for patients. To help enable t…
▽ More
Pharmaceutical companies continue to seek innovative ways to explore whether a drug under development is likely to be suitable for all or only an identifiable stratum of patients in the target population. The sooner this can be done during the clinical development process, the better it is for the company, and downstream for prescribers, payers, and most importantly, for patients. To help enable this vision of stratified medicine, we describe a powerful statistical framework, Patient Response Identifiers for Stratified Medicine (PRISM), for the discovery of potential predictors of drug response and associated subgroups using machine learning tools. PRISM is highly flexible and can have many "configurations", allowing the incorporation of complementary models or tools for a variety of outcomes and settings. One promising PRISM configuration is to use the observed outcomes for subgroup identification, while using counterfactual within-patient predicted treatment differences for subgroup-specific treatment estimates and associated interpretation. This separates the "subgroup-identification" from the "decision-making" and, to facilitate clinical design planning, is a simple way to obtain unbiased treatment effect sizes in the discovered subgroups. Simulation results, along with data from a real clinical trial are used to illustrate the utility of the proposed PRISM framework.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
