-
Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficulty
Authors:
Robert J. N. Baldock,
Hartmut Maennel,
Behnam Neyshabur
Abstract:
Existing work on understanding deep learning often employs measures that compress all data-dependent information into a few numbers. In this work, we adopt a perspective based on the role of individual examples. We introduce a measure of the computational difficulty of making a prediction for a given input: the (effective) prediction depth. Our extensive investigation reveals surprising yet simple…
▽ More
Existing work on understanding deep learning often employs measures that compress all data-dependent information into a few numbers. In this work, we adopt a perspective based on the role of individual examples. We introduce a measure of the computational difficulty of making a prediction for a given input: the (effective) prediction depth. Our extensive investigation reveals surprising yet simple relationships between the prediction depth of a given input and the model's uncertainty, confidence, accuracy and speed of learning for that data point. We further categorize difficult examples into three interpretable groups, demonstrate how these groups are processed differently inside deep models and showcase how this understanding allows us to improve prediction accuracy. Insights from our study lead to a coherent view of a number of separately reported phenomena in the literature: early layers generalize while later layers memorize; early layers converge faster and networks learn easy data and simple functions first.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2021; v1 submitted 17 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
What Do Neural Networks Learn When Trained With Random Labels?
Authors:
Hartmut Maennel,
Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin,
Ilya Tolstikhin,
Robert J. N. Baldock,
Olivier Bousquet,
Sylvain Gelly,
Daniel Keysers
Abstract:
We study deep neural networks (DNNs) trained on natural image data with entirely random labels. Despite its popularity in the literature, where it is often used to study memorization, generalization, and other phenomena, little is known about what DNNs learn in this setting. In this paper, we show analytically for convolutional and fully connected networks that an alignment between the principal c…
▽ More
We study deep neural networks (DNNs) trained on natural image data with entirely random labels. Despite its popularity in the literature, where it is often used to study memorization, generalization, and other phenomena, little is known about what DNNs learn in this setting. In this paper, we show analytically for convolutional and fully connected networks that an alignment between the principal components of network parameters and data takes place when training with random labels. We study this alignment effect by investigating neural networks pre-trained on randomly labelled image data and subsequently fine-tuned on disjoint datasets with random or real labels. We show how this alignment produces a positive transfer: networks pre-trained with random labels train faster downstream compared to training from scratch even after accounting for simple effects, such as weight scaling. We analyze how competing effects, such as specialization at later layers, may hide the positive transfer. These effects are studied in several network architectures, including VGG16 and ResNet18, on CIFAR10 and ImageNet.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2020; v1 submitted 18 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Exact marginal inference in Latent Dirichlet Allocation
Authors:
Hartmut Maennel
Abstract:
Assume we have potential "causes" $z\in Z$, which produce "events" $w$ with known probabilities $β(w|z)$. We observe $w_1,w_2,...,w_n$, what can we say about the distribution of the causes? A Bayesian estimate will assume a prior on distributions on $Z$ (we assume a Dirichlet prior) and calculate a posterior. An average over that posterior then gives a distribution on $Z$, which estimates how much…
▽ More
Assume we have potential "causes" $z\in Z$, which produce "events" $w$ with known probabilities $β(w|z)$. We observe $w_1,w_2,...,w_n$, what can we say about the distribution of the causes? A Bayesian estimate will assume a prior on distributions on $Z$ (we assume a Dirichlet prior) and calculate a posterior. An average over that posterior then gives a distribution on $Z$, which estimates how much each cause $z$ contributed to our observations. This is the setting of Latent Dirichlet Allocation, which can be applied e.g. to topics "producing" words in a document. In this setting usually the number of observed words is large, but the number of potential topics is small. We are here interested in applications with many potential "causes" (e.g. locations on the globe), but only a few observations. We show that the exact Bayesian estimate can be computed in linear time (and constant space) in $|Z|$ for a given upper bound on $n$ with a surprisingly simple formula. We generalize this algorithm to the case of sparse probabilities $β(w|z)$, in which we only need to assume that the tree width of an "interaction graph" on the observations is limited. On the other hand we also show that without such limitation the problem is NP-hard.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Adaptive Temporal-Difference Learning for Policy Evaluation with Per-State Uncertainty Estimates
Authors:
Hugo Penedones,
Carlos Riquelme,
Damien Vincent,
Hartmut Maennel,
Timothy Mann,
Andre Barreto,
Sylvain Gelly,
Gergely Neu
Abstract:
We consider the core reinforcement-learning problem of on-policy value function approximation from a batch of trajectory data, and focus on various issues of Temporal Difference (TD) learning and Monte Carlo (MC) policy evaluation. The two methods are known to achieve complementary bias-variance trade-off properties, with TD tending to achieve lower variance but potentially higher bias. In this pa…
▽ More
We consider the core reinforcement-learning problem of on-policy value function approximation from a batch of trajectory data, and focus on various issues of Temporal Difference (TD) learning and Monte Carlo (MC) policy evaluation. The two methods are known to achieve complementary bias-variance trade-off properties, with TD tending to achieve lower variance but potentially higher bias. In this paper, we argue that the larger bias of TD can be a result of the amplification of local approximation errors. We address this by proposing an algorithm that adaptively switches between TD and MC in each state, thus mitigating the propagation of errors. Our method is based on learned confidence intervals that detect biases of TD estimates. We demonstrate in a variety of policy evaluation tasks that this simple adaptive algorithm performs competitively with the best approach in hindsight, suggesting that learned confidence intervals are a powerful technique for adapting policy evaluation to use TD or MC returns in a data-driven way.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Temporal Difference Learning with Neural Networks - Study of the Leakage Propagation Problem
Authors:
Hugo Penedones,
Damien Vincent,
Hartmut Maennel,
Sylvain Gelly,
Timothy Mann,
Andre Barreto
Abstract:
Temporal-Difference learning (TD) [Sutton, 1988] with function approximation can converge to solutions that are worse than those obtained by Monte-Carlo regression, even in the simple case of on-policy evaluation. To increase our understanding of the problem, we investigate the issue of approximation errors in areas of sharp discontinuities of the value function being further propagated by bootstr…
▽ More
Temporal-Difference learning (TD) [Sutton, 1988] with function approximation can converge to solutions that are worse than those obtained by Monte-Carlo regression, even in the simple case of on-policy evaluation. To increase our understanding of the problem, we investigate the issue of approximation errors in areas of sharp discontinuities of the value function being further propagated by bootstrap updates. We show empirical evidence of this leakage propagation, and show analytically that it must occur, in a simple Markov chain, when function approximation errors are present. For reversible policies, the result can be interpreted as the tension between two terms of the loss function that TD minimises, as recently described by [Ollivier, 2018]. We show that the upper bounds from [Tsitsiklis and Van Roy, 1997] hold, but they do not imply that leakage propagation occurs and under what conditions. Finally, we test whether the problem could be mitigated with a better state representation, and whether it can be learned in an unsupervised manner, without rewards or privileged information.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
Gradient Descent Quantizes ReLU Network Features
Authors:
Hartmut Maennel,
Olivier Bousquet,
Sylvain Gelly
Abstract:
Deep neural networks are often trained in the over-parametrized regime (i.e. with far more parameters than training examples), and understanding why the training converges to solutions that generalize remains an open problem. Several studies have highlighted the fact that the training procedure, i.e. mini-batch Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) leads to solutions that have specific properties in t…
▽ More
Deep neural networks are often trained in the over-parametrized regime (i.e. with far more parameters than training examples), and understanding why the training converges to solutions that generalize remains an open problem. Several studies have highlighted the fact that the training procedure, i.e. mini-batch Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) leads to solutions that have specific properties in the loss landscape. However, even with plain Gradient Descent (GD) the solutions found in the over-parametrized regime are pretty good and this phenomenon is poorly understood.
We propose an analysis of this behavior for feedforward networks with a ReLU activation function under the assumption of small initialization and learning rate and uncover a quantization effect: The weight vectors tend to concentrate at a small number of directions determined by the input data. As a consequence, we show that for given input data there are only finitely many, "simple" functions that can be obtained, independent of the network size. This puts these functions in analogy to linear interpolations (for given input data there are finitely many triangulations, which each determine a function by linear interpolation). We ask whether this analogy extends to the generalization properties - while the usual distribution-independent generalization property does not hold, it could be that for e.g. smooth functions with bounded second derivative an approximation property holds which could "explain" generalization of networks (of unbounded size) to unseen inputs.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
