Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Li, M L

Neyman Meets Causal Machine Learning: Experimental Evaluation of Individualized Treatment Rules

Authors: Michael Lingzhi Li, Kosuke Imai

Abstract: A century ago, Neyman showed how to evaluate the efficacy of treatment using a randomized experiment under a minimal set of assumptions. This classical repeated sampling framework serves as a basis of routine experimental analyses conducted by today's scientists across disciplines. In this paper, we demonstrate that Neyman's methodology can also be used to experimentally evaluate the efficacy of i… ▽ More A century ago, Neyman showed how to evaluate the efficacy of treatment using a randomized experiment under a minimal set of assumptions. This classical repeated sampling framework serves as a basis of routine experimental analyses conducted by today's scientists across disciplines. In this paper, we demonstrate that Neyman's methodology can also be used to experimentally evaluate the efficacy of individualized treatment rules (ITRs), which are derived by modern causal machine learning algorithms. In particular, we show how to account for additional uncertainty resulting from a training process based on cross-fitting. The primary advantage of Neyman's approach is that it can be applied to any ITR regardless of the properties of machine learning algorithms that are used to derive the ITR. We also show, somewhat surprisingly, that for certain metrics, it is more efficient to conduct this ex-post experimental evaluation of an ITR than to conduct an ex-ante experimental evaluation that randomly assigns some units to the ITR. Our analysis demonstrates that Neyman's repeated sampling framework is as relevant for causal inference today as it has been since its inception. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

The Cram Method for Efficient Simultaneous Learning and Evaluation

Authors: Zeyang Jia, Kosuke Imai, Michael Lingzhi Li

Abstract: We introduce the "cram" method, a general and efficient approach to simultaneous learning and evaluation using a generic machine learning (ML) algorithm. In a single pass of batched data, the proposed method repeatedly trains an ML algorithm and tests its empirical performance. Because it utilizes the entire sample for both learning and evaluation, cramming is significantly more data-efficient tha… ▽ More We introduce the "cram" method, a general and efficient approach to simultaneous learning and evaluation using a generic machine learning (ML) algorithm. In a single pass of batched data, the proposed method repeatedly trains an ML algorithm and tests its empirical performance. Because it utilizes the entire sample for both learning and evaluation, cramming is significantly more data-efficient than sample-splitting. The cram method also naturally accommodates online learning algorithms, making its implementation computationally efficient. To demonstrate the power of the cram method, we consider the standard policy learning setting where cramming is applied to the same data to both develop an individualized treatment rule (ITR) and estimate the average outcome that would result if the learned ITR were to be deployed. We show that under a minimal set of assumptions, the resulting crammed evaluation estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. While our asymptotic results require a relatively weak stabilization condition of ML algorithm, we develop a simple, generic method that can be used with any policy learning algorithm to satisfy this condition. Our extensive simulation studies show that, when compared to sample-splitting, cramming reduces the evaluation standard error by more than 40% while improving the performance of learned policy. We also apply the cram method to a randomized clinical trial to demonstrate its applicability to real-world problems. Finally, we briefly discuss future extensions of the cram method to other learning and evaluation settings. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Statistical Performance Guarantee for Subgroup Identification with Generic Machine Learning

Authors: Michael Lingzhi Li, Kosuke Imai

Abstract: Across a wide array of disciplines, many researchers use machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify a subgroup of individuals who are likely to benefit from a treatment the most (``exceptional responders'') or those who are harmed by it. A common approach to this subgroup identification problem consists of two steps. First, researchers estimate the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) usi… ▽ More Across a wide array of disciplines, many researchers use machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify a subgroup of individuals who are likely to benefit from a treatment the most (``exceptional responders'') or those who are harmed by it. A common approach to this subgroup identification problem consists of two steps. First, researchers estimate the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) using an ML algorithm. Next, they use the estimated CATE to select those individuals who are predicted to be most affected by the treatment, either positively or negatively. Unfortunately, CATE estimates are often biased and noisy. In addition, utilizing the same data to both identify a subgroup and estimate its group average treatment effect results in a multiple testing problem. To address these challenges, we develop uniform confidence bands for estimation of the group average treatment effect sorted by generic ML algorithm (GATES). Using these uniform confidence bands, researchers can identify, with a statistical guarantee, a subgroup whose GATES exceeds a certain effect size, regardless of how this effect size is chosen. The validity of the proposed methodology depends solely on randomization of treatment and random sampling of units. Importantly, our method does not require modeling assumptions and avoids a computationally intensive resampling procedure. A simulation study shows that the proposed uniform confidence bands are reasonably informative and have an appropriate empirical coverage even when the sample size is as small as 100. We analyze a clinical trial of late-stage prostate cancer and find a relatively large proportion of exceptional responders. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2023; v1 submitted 11 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Distributionally Robust Causal Inference with Observational Data

Authors: Dimitris Bertsimas, Kosuke Imai, Michael Lingzhi Li

Abstract: We consider the estimation of average treatment effects in observational studies and propose a new framework of robust causal inference with unobserved confounders. Our approach is based on distributionally robust optimization and proceeds in two steps. We first specify the maximal degree to which the distribution of unobserved potential outcomes may deviate from that of observed outcomes. We then… ▽ More We consider the estimation of average treatment effects in observational studies and propose a new framework of robust causal inference with unobserved confounders. Our approach is based on distributionally robust optimization and proceeds in two steps. We first specify the maximal degree to which the distribution of unobserved potential outcomes may deviate from that of observed outcomes. We then derive sharp bounds on the average treatment effects under this assumption. Our framework encompasses the popular marginal sensitivity model as a special case, and we demonstrate how the proposed methodology can address a primary challenge of the marginal sensitivity model that it produces uninformative results when unobserved confounders substantially affect treatment and outcome. Specifically, we develop an alternative sensitivity model, called the distributional sensitivity model, under the assumption that heterogeneity of treatment effect due to unobserved variables is relatively small. Unlike the marginal sensitivity model, the distributional sensitivity model allows for potential lack of overlap and often produces informative bounds even when unobserved variables substantially affect both treatment and outcome. Finally, we show how to extend the distributional sensitivity model to difference-in-differences designs and settings with instrumental variables. Through simulation and empirical studies, we demonstrate the applicability of the proposed methodology. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2023; v1 submitted 15 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Statistical Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Discovered by Generic Machine Learning in Randomized Experiments

Authors: Kosuke Imai, Michael Lingzhi Li

Abstract: Researchers are increasingly turning to machine learning (ML) algorithms to investigate causal heterogeneity in randomized experiments. Despite their promise, ML algorithms may fail to accurately ascertain heterogeneous treatment effects under practical settings with many covariates and small sample size. In addition, the quantification of estimation uncertainty remains a challenge. We develop a g… ▽ More Researchers are increasingly turning to machine learning (ML) algorithms to investigate causal heterogeneity in randomized experiments. Despite their promise, ML algorithms may fail to accurately ascertain heterogeneous treatment effects under practical settings with many covariates and small sample size. In addition, the quantification of estimation uncertainty remains a challenge. We develop a general approach to statistical inference for heterogeneous treatment effects discovered by a generic ML algorithm. We apply the Neyman's repeated sampling framework to a common setting, in which researchers use an ML algorithm to estimate the conditional average treatment effect and then divide the sample into several groups based on the magnitude of the estimated effects. We show how to estimate the average treatment effect within each of these groups, and construct a valid confidence interval. In addition, we develop nonparametric tests of treatment effect homogeneity across groups, and rank-consistency of within-group average treatment effects. The validity of our methodology does not rely on the properties of ML algorithms because it is solely based on the randomization of treatment assignment and random sampling of units. Finally, we generalize our methodology to the cross-fitting procedure by accounting for the additional uncertainty induced by the random splitting of data. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2024; v1 submitted 28 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Stochastic Cutting Planes for Data-Driven Optimization

Authors: Dimitris Bertsimas, Michael Lingzhi Li

Abstract: We introduce a stochastic version of the cutting-plane method for a large class of data-driven Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Optimization (MINLO) problems. We show that under very weak assumptions the stochastic algorithm is able to converge to an $ε$-optimal solution with high probability. Numerical experiments on several problems show that stochastic cutting planes is able to deliver a multiple order-… ▽ More We introduce a stochastic version of the cutting-plane method for a large class of data-driven Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Optimization (MINLO) problems. We show that under very weak assumptions the stochastic algorithm is able to converge to an $ε$-optimal solution with high probability. Numerical experiments on several problems show that stochastic cutting planes is able to deliver a multiple order-of-magnitude speedup compared to the standard cutting-plane method. We further experimentally explore the lower limits of sampling for stochastic cutting planes and show that for many problems, a sampling size of $O(\sqrt[3]{n})$ appears to be sufficient for high quality solutions. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Slowly Varying Regression under Sparsity

Authors: Dimitris Bertsimas, Vassilis Digalakis Jr, Michael Linghzi Li, Omar Skali Lami

Abstract: We present the framework of slowly varying regression under sparsity, allowing sparse regression models to exhibit slow and sparse variations. The problem of parameter estimation is formulated as a mixed-integer optimization problem. We demonstrate that it can be precisely reformulated as a binary convex optimization problem through a novel relaxation technique. This relaxation involves a new equa… ▽ More We present the framework of slowly varying regression under sparsity, allowing sparse regression models to exhibit slow and sparse variations. The problem of parameter estimation is formulated as a mixed-integer optimization problem. We demonstrate that it can be precisely reformulated as a binary convex optimization problem through a novel relaxation technique. This relaxation involves a new equality on Moore-Penrose inverses, convexifying the non-convex objective function while matching the original objective on all feasible binary points. This enables us to efficiently solve the problem to provable optimality using a cutting plane-type algorithm. We develop a highly optimized implementation of this algorithm, substantially improving upon the asymptotic computational complexity of a straightforward implementation. Additionally, we propose a fast heuristic method that guarantees a feasible solution and, as empirically illustrated, produces high-quality warm-start solutions for the binary optimization problem. To tune the framework's hyperparameters, we suggest a practical procedure relying on binary search that, under certain assumptions, is guaranteed to recover the true model parameters. On both synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrate that the resulting algorithm outperforms competing formulations in comparable times across various metrics, including estimation accuracy, predictive power, and computational time. The algorithm is highly scalable, allowing us to train models with thousands of parameters. Our implementation is available open-source at https://github.com/vvdigalakis/SSVRegression.git. △ Less

Submitted 11 November, 2023; v1 submitted 21 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: Submitted to Operations Research. First submission: 02/2021

From predictions to prescriptions: A data-driven response to COVID-19

Authors: Dimitris Bertsimas, Léonard Boussioux, Ryan Cory Wright, Arthur Delarue, Vassilis Digalakis Jr., Alexandre Jacquillat, Driss Lahlou Kitane, Galit Lukin, Michael Lingzhi Li, Luca Mingardi, Omid Nohadani, Agni Orfanoudaki, Theodore Papalexopoulos, Ivan Paskov, Jean Pauphilet, Omar Skali Lami, Bartolomeo Stellato, Hamza Tazi Bouardi, Kimberly Villalobos Carballo, Holly Wiberg, Cynthia Zeng

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges worldwide. Strained healthcare providers make difficult decisions on patient triage, treatment and care management on a daily basis. Policy makers have imposed social distancing measures to slow the disease, at a steep economic price. We design analytical tools to support these decisions and combat the pandemic. Specifically, we propose a… ▽ More The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges worldwide. Strained healthcare providers make difficult decisions on patient triage, treatment and care management on a daily basis. Policy makers have imposed social distancing measures to slow the disease, at a steep economic price. We design analytical tools to support these decisions and combat the pandemic. Specifically, we propose a comprehensive data-driven approach to understand the clinical characteristics of COVID-19, predict its mortality, forecast its evolution, and ultimately alleviate its impact. By leveraging cohort-level clinical data, patient-level hospital data, and census-level epidemiological data, we develop an integrated four-step approach, combining descriptive, predictive and prescriptive analytics. First, we aggregate hundreds of clinical studies into the most comprehensive database on COVID-19 to paint a new macroscopic picture of the disease. Second, we build personalized calculators to predict the risk of infection and mortality as a function of demographics, symptoms, comorbidities, and lab values. Third, we develop a novel epidemiological model to project the pandemic's spread and inform social distancing policies. Fourth, we propose an optimization model to re-allocate ventilators and alleviate shortages. Our results have been used at the clinical level by several hospitals to triage patients, guide care management, plan ICU capacity, and re-distribute ventilators. At the policy level, they are currently supporting safe back-to-work policies at a major institution and equitable vaccine distribution planning at a major pharmaceutical company, and have been integrated into the US Center for Disease Control's pandemic forecast. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: Submitted to PNAS

A Hierarchy of Graph Neural Networks Based on Learnable Local Features

Authors: Michael Lingzhi Li, Meng Dong, Jiawei Zhou, Alexander M. Rush

Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a powerful tool to learn representations on graphs by iteratively aggregating features from node neighbourhoods. Many variant models have been proposed, but there is limited understanding on both how to compare different architectures and how to construct GNNs systematically. Here, we propose a hierarchy of GNNs based on their aggregation regions. We derive theoret… ▽ More Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a powerful tool to learn representations on graphs by iteratively aggregating features from node neighbourhoods. Many variant models have been proposed, but there is limited understanding on both how to compare different architectures and how to construct GNNs systematically. Here, we propose a hierarchy of GNNs based on their aggregation regions. We derive theoretical results about the discriminative power and feature representation capabilities of each class. Then, we show how this framework can be utilized to systematically construct arbitrarily powerful GNNs. As an example, we construct a simple architecture that exceeds the expressiveness of the Weisfeiler-Lehman graph isomorphism test. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and real-world benchmarks, and demonstrate our example's theoretical power translates to strong results on node classification, graph classification, and graph regression tasks. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Fast Exact Matrix Completion: A Unified Optimization Framework for Matrix Completion

Authors: Dimitris Bertsimas, Michael Lingzhi Li

Abstract: We formulate the problem of matrix completion with and without side information as a non-convex optimization problem. We design fastImpute based on non-convex gradient descent and show it converges to a global minimum that is guaranteed to recover closely the underlying matrix while it scales to matrices of sizes beyond $10^5 \times 10^5$. We report experiments on both synthetic and real-world dat… ▽ More We formulate the problem of matrix completion with and without side information as a non-convex optimization problem. We design fastImpute based on non-convex gradient descent and show it converges to a global minimum that is guaranteed to recover closely the underlying matrix while it scales to matrices of sizes beyond $10^5 \times 10^5$. We report experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets that show fastImpute is competitive in both the accuracy of the matrix recovered and the time needed across all cases. Furthermore, when a high number of entries are missing, fastImpute is over $75\%$ lower in MAPE and $15$ times faster than current state-of-the-art matrix completion methods in both the case with side information and without. △ Less

Submitted 31 December, 2020; v1 submitted 20 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Journal ref: Journal of Machine Learning Research 21 (2020) 1-43

Experimental Evaluation of Individualized Treatment Rules

Authors: Kosuke Imai, Michael Lingzhi Li

Abstract: The increasing availability of individual-level data has led to numerous applications of individualized (or personalized) treatment rules (ITRs). Policy makers often wish to empirically evaluate ITRs and compare their relative performance before implementing them in a target population. We propose a new evaluation metric, the population average prescriptive effect (PAPE). The PAPE compares the per… ▽ More The increasing availability of individual-level data has led to numerous applications of individualized (or personalized) treatment rules (ITRs). Policy makers often wish to empirically evaluate ITRs and compare their relative performance before implementing them in a target population. We propose a new evaluation metric, the population average prescriptive effect (PAPE). The PAPE compares the performance of ITR with that of non-individualized treatment rule, which randomly treats the same proportion of units. Averaging the PAPE over a range of budget constraints yields our second evaluation metric, the area under the prescriptive effect curve (AUPEC). The AUPEC represents an overall performance measure for evaluation, like the area under the receiver and operating characteristic curve (AUROC) does for classification, and is a generalization of the QINI coefficient utilized in uplift modeling. We use Neyman's repeated sampling framework to estimate the PAPE and AUPEC and derive their exact finite-sample variances based on random sampling of units and random assignment of treatment. We extend our methodology to a common setting, in which the same experimental data is used to both estimate and evaluate ITRs. In this case, our variance calculation incorporates the additional uncertainty due to random splits of data used for cross-validation. The proposed evaluation metrics can be estimated without requiring modeling assumptions, asymptotic approximation, or resampling methods. As a result, it is applicable to any ITR including those based on complex machine learning algorithms. The open-source software package is available for implementing the proposed methodology. △ Less

Submitted 5 May, 2021; v1 submitted 14 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: Accepted at JASA

Duration-of-Stay Storage Assignment under Uncertainty

Authors: Michael Lingzhi Li, Elliott Wolf, Daniel Wintz

Abstract: Optimizing storage assignment is a central problem in warehousing. Past literature has shown the superiority of the Duration-of-Stay (DoS) method in assigning pallets, but the methodology requires perfect prior knowledge of DoS for each pallet, which is unknown and uncertain under realistic conditions. The dynamic nature of a warehouse further complicates the validity of synthetic data testing tha… ▽ More Optimizing storage assignment is a central problem in warehousing. Past literature has shown the superiority of the Duration-of-Stay (DoS) method in assigning pallets, but the methodology requires perfect prior knowledge of DoS for each pallet, which is unknown and uncertain under realistic conditions. The dynamic nature of a warehouse further complicates the validity of synthetic data testing that is often conducted for algorithms. In this paper, in collaboration with a large cold storage company, we release the first publicly available set of warehousing records to facilitate research into this central problem. We introduce a new framework for storage assignment that accounts for uncertainty in warehouses. Then, by utilizing a combination of convolutional and recurrent neural network models, ParallelNet, we show that it is able to predict future shipments well: it achieves up to 29% decrease in MAPE compared to CNN-LSTM on unseen future shipments, and suffers less performance decay over time. The framework is then integrated into a first-of-its-kind Storage Assignment system, which is being piloted in warehouses across the country, with initial results showing up to 19% in labor savings. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2020; v1 submitted 12 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: 15 pages, 4 figures. Accepted at ICLR 2020

Scalable Holistic Linear Regression

Authors: Dimitris Bertsimas, Michael Lingzhi Li

Abstract: We propose a new scalable algorithm for holistic linear regression building on Bertsimas & King (2016). Specifically, we develop new theory to model significance and multicollinearity as lazy constraints rather than checking the conditions iteratively. The resulting algorithm scales with the number of samples $n$ in the 10,000s, compared to the low 100s in the previous framework. Computational res… ▽ More We propose a new scalable algorithm for holistic linear regression building on Bertsimas & King (2016). Specifically, we develop new theory to model significance and multicollinearity as lazy constraints rather than checking the conditions iteratively. The resulting algorithm scales with the number of samples $n$ in the 10,000s, compared to the low 100s in the previous framework. Computational results on real and synthetic datasets show it greatly improves from previous algorithms in accuracy, false detection rate, computational time and scalability. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2020; v1 submitted 8 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Comments: Accepted by Operation Research Letters

Interpretable Matrix Completion: A Discrete Optimization Approach

Authors: Dimitris Bertsimas, Michael Lingzhi Li

Abstract: We consider the problem of matrix completion on an $n \times m$ matrix. We introduce the problem of Interpretable Matrix Completion that aims to provide meaningful insights for the low-rank matrix using side information. We show that the problem can be reformulated as a binary convex optimization problem. We design OptComplete, based on a novel concept of stochastic cutting planes to enable effici… ▽ More We consider the problem of matrix completion on an $n \times m$ matrix. We introduce the problem of Interpretable Matrix Completion that aims to provide meaningful insights for the low-rank matrix using side information. We show that the problem can be reformulated as a binary convex optimization problem. We design OptComplete, based on a novel concept of stochastic cutting planes to enable efficient scaling of the algorithm up to matrices of sizes $n=10^6$ and $m=10^6$. We report experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets that show that OptComplete has favorable scaling behavior and accuracy when compared with state-of-the-art methods for other types of matrix completion, while providing insight on the factors that affect the matrix. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2020; v1 submitted 17 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: Submitted to Operational Research