-
Short and simple introduction to Bellman filtering and smoothing
Authors:
Rutger-Jan Lange
Abstract:
Based on Bellman's dynamic-programming principle, Lange (2024) presents an approximate method for filtering, smoothing and parameter estimation for possibly non-linear and/or non-Gaussian state-space models. While the approach applies more generally, this pedagogical note highlights the main results in the case where (i) the state transition remains linear and Gaussian while (ii) the observation d…
▽ More
Based on Bellman's dynamic-programming principle, Lange (2024) presents an approximate method for filtering, smoothing and parameter estimation for possibly non-linear and/or non-Gaussian state-space models. While the approach applies more generally, this pedagogical note highlights the main results in the case where (i) the state transition remains linear and Gaussian while (ii) the observation density is log-concave and sufficiently smooth in the state variable. I demonstrate how Kalman's (1960) filter and Rauch et al.'s (1965) smoother can be obtained as special cases within the proposed framework. The main aim is to present non-experts (and my own students) with an accessible introduction, enabling them to implement the proposed methods.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Clustering units in neural networks: upstream vs downstream information
Authors:
Richard D. Lange,
David S. Rolnick,
Konrad P. Kording
Abstract:
It has been hypothesized that some form of "modular" structure in artificial neural networks should be useful for learning, compositionality, and generalization. However, defining and quantifying modularity remains an open problem. We cast the problem of detecting functional modules into the problem of detecting clusters of similar-functioning units. This begs the question of what makes two units…
▽ More
It has been hypothesized that some form of "modular" structure in artificial neural networks should be useful for learning, compositionality, and generalization. However, defining and quantifying modularity remains an open problem. We cast the problem of detecting functional modules into the problem of detecting clusters of similar-functioning units. This begs the question of what makes two units functionally similar. For this, we consider two broad families of methods: those that define similarity based on how units respond to structured variations in inputs ("upstream"), and those based on how variations in hidden unit activations affect outputs ("downstream"). We conduct an empirical study quantifying modularity of hidden layer representations of simple feedforward, fully connected networks, across a range of hyperparameters. For each model, we quantify pairwise associations between hidden units in each layer using a variety of both upstream and downstream measures, then cluster them by maximizing their "modularity score" using established tools from network science. We find two surprising results: first, dropout dramatically increased modularity, while other forms of weight regularization had more modest effects. Second, although we observe that there is usually good agreement about clusters within both upstream methods and downstream methods, there is little agreement about the cluster assignments across these two families of methods. This has important implications for representation-learning, as it suggests that finding modular representations that reflect structure in inputs (e.g. disentanglement) may be a distinct goal from learning modular representations that reflect structure in outputs (e.g. compositionality).
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Interpolating between sampling and variational inference with infinite stochastic mixtures
Authors:
Richard D. Lange,
Ari Benjamin,
Ralf M. Haefner,
Xaq Pitkow
Abstract:
Sampling and Variational Inference (VI) are two large families of methods for approximate inference that have complementary strengths. Sampling methods excel at approximating arbitrary probability distributions, but can be inefficient. VI methods are efficient, but may misrepresent the true distribution. Here, we develop a general framework where approximations are stochastic mixtures of simple co…
▽ More
Sampling and Variational Inference (VI) are two large families of methods for approximate inference that have complementary strengths. Sampling methods excel at approximating arbitrary probability distributions, but can be inefficient. VI methods are efficient, but may misrepresent the true distribution. Here, we develop a general framework where approximations are stochastic mixtures of simple component distributions. Both sampling and VI can be seen as special cases: in sampling, each mixture component is a delta-function and is chosen stochastically, while in standard VI a single component is chosen to minimize divergence. We derive a practical method that interpolates between sampling and VI by solving an optimization problem over a mixing distribution. Intermediate inference methods then arise by varying a single parameter. Our method provably improves on sampling (reducing variance) and on VI (reducing bias+variance despite increasing variance). We demonstrate our method's bias/variance trade-off in practice on reference problems, and we compare outcomes to commonly used sampling and VI methods. This work takes a step towards a highly flexible yet simple family of inference methods that combines the complementary strengths of sampling and VI.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2022; v1 submitted 18 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Eliciting judgements about dependent quantities of interest: The SHELF extension and copula methods illustrated using an asthma case study
Authors:
Björn Holzhauer,
Lisa V. Hampson,
John Paul Gosling,
Björn Bornkamp,
Joseph Kahn,
Markus R. Lange,
Wen-Lin Luo,
Caterina Brindicci,
David Lawrence,
Steffen Ballerstedt,
Anthony O'Hagan
Abstract:
Pharmaceutical companies regularly need to make decisions about drug development programs based on the limited knowledge from early stage clinical trials. In this situation, eliciting the judgements of experts is an attractive approach for synthesising evidence on the unknown quantities of interest. When calculating the probability of success for a drug development program, multiple quantities of…
▽ More
Pharmaceutical companies regularly need to make decisions about drug development programs based on the limited knowledge from early stage clinical trials. In this situation, eliciting the judgements of experts is an attractive approach for synthesising evidence on the unknown quantities of interest. When calculating the probability of success for a drug development program, multiple quantities of interest - such as the effect of a drug on different endpoints - should not be treated as unrelated.
We discuss two approaches for establishing a multivariate distribution for several related quantities within the SHeffield ELicitation Framework (SHELF). The first approach elicits experts' judgements about a quantity of interest conditional on knowledge about another one. For the second approach, we first elicit marginal distributions for each quantity of interest. Then, for each pair of quantities, we elicit the concordance probability that both lie on the same side of their respective elicited medians. This allows us to specify a copula to obtain the joint distribution of the quantities of interest.
We show how these approaches were used in an elicitation workshop that was performed to assess the probability of success of the registrational program of an asthma drug. The judgements of the experts, which were obtained prior to completion of the pivotal studies, were well aligned with the final trial results.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2021; v1 submitted 4 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Improving the assessment of the probability of success in late stage drug development
Authors:
Lisa V Hampson,
Björn Bornkamp,
Björn Holzhauer,
Joseph Kahn,
Markus R Lange,
Wen-Lin Luo,
Giovanni Della Cioppa,
Kelvin Stott,
Steffen Ballerstedt
Abstract:
There are several steps to confirming the safety and efficacy of a new medicine. A sequence of trials, each with its own objectives, is usually required. Quantitative risk metrics can be useful for informing decisions about whether a medicine should transition from one stage of development to the next. To obtain an estimate of the probability of regulatory approval, pharmaceutical companies may st…
▽ More
There are several steps to confirming the safety and efficacy of a new medicine. A sequence of trials, each with its own objectives, is usually required. Quantitative risk metrics can be useful for informing decisions about whether a medicine should transition from one stage of development to the next. To obtain an estimate of the probability of regulatory approval, pharmaceutical companies may start with industry-wide success rates and then apply to these subjective adjustments to reflect program-specific information. However, this approach lacks transparency and fails to make full use of data from previous clinical trials. We describe a quantitative Bayesian approach for calculating the probability of success (PoS) at the end of phase II which incorporates internal clinical data from one or more phase IIb studies, industry-wide success rates, and expert opinion or external data if needed. Using an example, we illustrate how PoS can be calculated accounting for differences between the phase IIb data and future phase III trials, and discuss how the methods can be extended to accommodate accelerated drug development pathways.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2021; v1 submitted 4 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Bellman filtering and smoothing for state-space models
Authors:
Rutger-Jan Lange
Abstract:
This paper presents a new filter for state-space models based on Bellman's dynamic-programming principle, allowing for nonlinearity, non-Gaussianity and degeneracy in the observation and/or state-transition equations. The resulting Bellman filter is a direct generalisation of the (iterated and extended) Kalman filter, enabling scalability to higher dimensions while remaining computationally inexpe…
▽ More
This paper presents a new filter for state-space models based on Bellman's dynamic-programming principle, allowing for nonlinearity, non-Gaussianity and degeneracy in the observation and/or state-transition equations. The resulting Bellman filter is a direct generalisation of the (iterated and extended) Kalman filter, enabling scalability to higher dimensions while remaining computationally inexpensive. It can also be extended to enable smoothing. Under suitable conditions, the Bellman-filtered states are stable over time and contractive towards a region around the true state at every time step. Static (hyper)parameters are estimated by maximising a filter-implied pseudo log-likelihood decomposition. In univariate simulation studies, the Bellman filter performs on par with state-of-the-art simulation-based techniques at a fraction of the computational cost. In two empirical applications, involving up to 150 spatial dimensions or highly degenerate/nonlinear state dynamics, the Bellman filter outperforms competing methods in both accuracy and speed.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2023; v1 submitted 26 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Reinforcement Learning with Structured Hierarchical Grammar Representations of Actions
Authors:
Petros Christodoulou,
Robert Tjarko Lange,
Ali Shafti,
A. Aldo Faisal
Abstract:
From a young age humans learn to use grammatical principles to hierarchically combine words into sentences. Action grammars is the parallel idea, that there is an underlying set of rules (a "grammar") that govern how we hierarchically combine actions to form new, more complex actions. We introduce the Action Grammar Reinforcement Learning (AG-RL) framework which leverages the concept of action gra…
▽ More
From a young age humans learn to use grammatical principles to hierarchically combine words into sentences. Action grammars is the parallel idea, that there is an underlying set of rules (a "grammar") that govern how we hierarchically combine actions to form new, more complex actions. We introduce the Action Grammar Reinforcement Learning (AG-RL) framework which leverages the concept of action grammars to consistently improve the sample efficiency of Reinforcement Learning agents. AG-RL works by using a grammar inference algorithm to infer the "action grammar" of an agent midway through training. The agent's action space is then augmented with macro-actions identified by the grammar. We apply this framework to Double Deep Q-Learning (AG-DDQN) and a discrete action version of Soft Actor-Critic (AG-SAC) and find that it improves performance in 8 out of 8 tested Atari games (median +31%, max +668%) and 19 out of 20 tested Atari games (median +96%, maximum +3,756%) respectively without substantive hyperparameter tuning. We also show that AG-SAC beats the model-free state-of-the-art for sample efficiency in 17 out of the 20 tested Atari games (median +62%, maximum +13,140%), again without substantive hyperparameter tuning.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2019; v1 submitted 7 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
