Minimax optimal goodness-of-fit testing for densities and multinomials under a local differential privacy constraint
Authors:
Joseph Lam-Weil,
Béatrice Laurent,
Jean-Michel Loubes
Abstract:
Finding anonymization mechanisms to protect personal data is at the heart of recent machine learning research. Here, we consider the consequences of local differential privacy constraints on goodness-of-fit testing, i.e. the statistical problem assessing whether sample points are generated from a fixed density $f_0$, or not. The observations are kept hidden and replaced by a stochastic transformat…
▽ More
Finding anonymization mechanisms to protect personal data is at the heart of recent machine learning research. Here, we consider the consequences of local differential privacy constraints on goodness-of-fit testing, i.e. the statistical problem assessing whether sample points are generated from a fixed density $f_0$, or not. The observations are kept hidden and replaced by a stochastic transformation satisfying the local differential privacy constraint. In this setting, we propose a testing procedure which is based on an estimation of the quadratic distance between the density $f$ of the unobserved samples and $f_0$. We establish an upper bound on the separation distance associated with this test, and a matching lower bound on the minimax separation rates of testing under non-interactive privacy in the case that $f_0$ is uniform, in discrete and continuous settings. To the best of our knowledge, we provide the first minimax optimal test and associated private transformation under a local differential privacy constraint over Besov balls in the continuous setting, quantifying the price to pay for data privacy. We also present a test that is adaptive to the smoothness parameter of the unknown density and remains minimax optimal up to a logarithmic factor. Finally, we note that our results can be translated to the discrete case, where the treatment of probability vectors is shown to be equivalent to that of piecewise constant densities in our setting. That is why we work with a unified setting for both the continuous and the discrete cases.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2021; v1 submitted 11 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
Local minimax rates for closeness testing of discrete distributions
Authors:
Joseph Lam-Weil,
Alexandra Carpentier,
Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
Abstract:
We consider the closeness testing problem for discrete distributions. The goal is to distinguish whether two samples are drawn from the same unspecified distribution, or whether their respective distributions are separated in $L_1$-norm. In this paper, we focus on adapting the rate to the shape of the underlying distributions, i.e. we consider \textit{a local minimax setting}. We provide, to the b…
▽ More
We consider the closeness testing problem for discrete distributions. The goal is to distinguish whether two samples are drawn from the same unspecified distribution, or whether their respective distributions are separated in $L_1$-norm. In this paper, we focus on adapting the rate to the shape of the underlying distributions, i.e. we consider \textit{a local minimax setting}. We provide, to the best of our knowledge, the first local minimax rate for the separation distance up to logarithmic factors, together with a test that achieves it. In view of the rate, closeness testing turns out to be substantially harder than the related one-sample testing problem over a wide range of cases.
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2021; v1 submitted 1 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
