Showing 1–50 of 60 results for author: Lam, H

Is Cross-Validation the Gold Standard to Evaluate Model Performance?

Authors: Garud Iyengar, Henry Lam, Tianyu Wang

Abstract: Cross-Validation (CV) is the default choice for evaluating the performance of machine learning models. Despite its wide usage, their statistical benefits have remained half-understood, especially in challenging nonparametric regimes. In this paper we fill in this gap and show that in fact, for a wide spectrum of models, CV does not statistically outperform the simple "plug-in" approach where one r… ▽ More Cross-Validation (CV) is the default choice for evaluating the performance of machine learning models. Despite its wide usage, their statistical benefits have remained half-understood, especially in challenging nonparametric regimes. In this paper we fill in this gap and show that in fact, for a wide spectrum of models, CV does not statistically outperform the simple "plug-in" approach where one reuses training data for testing evaluation. Specifically, in terms of both the asymptotic bias and coverage accuracy of the associated interval for out-of-sample evaluation, $K$-fold CV provably cannot outperform plug-in regardless of the rate at which the parametric or nonparametric models converge. Leave-one-out CV can have a smaller bias as compared to plug-in; however, this bias improvement is negligible compared to the variability of the evaluation, and in some important cases leave-one-out again does not outperform plug-in once this variability is taken into account. We obtain our theoretical comparisons via a novel higher-order Taylor analysis that allows us to derive necessary conditions for limit theorems of testing evaluations, which applies to model classes that are not amenable to previously known sufficient conditions. Our numerical results demonstrate that plug-in performs indeed no worse than CV across a wide range of examples. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Bayesian Bandit Algorithms with Approximate Inference in Stochastic Linear Bandits

Authors: Ziyi Huang, Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang

Abstract: Bayesian bandit algorithms with approximate Bayesian inference have been widely used in real-world applications. Nevertheless, their theoretical justification is less investigated in the literature, especially for contextual bandit problems. To fill this gap, we propose a general theoretical framework to analyze stochastic linear bandits in the presence of approximate inference and conduct regret… ▽ More Bayesian bandit algorithms with approximate Bayesian inference have been widely used in real-world applications. Nevertheless, their theoretical justification is less investigated in the literature, especially for contextual bandit problems. To fill this gap, we propose a general theoretical framework to analyze stochastic linear bandits in the presence of approximate inference and conduct regret analysis on two Bayesian bandit algorithms, Linear Thompson sampling (LinTS) and the extension of Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound, namely Linear Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound (LinBUCB). We demonstrate that both LinTS and LinBUCB can preserve their original rates of regret upper bound but with a sacrifice of larger constant terms when applied with approximate inference. These results hold for general Bayesian inference approaches, under the assumption that the inference error measured by two different $α$-divergences is bounded. Additionally, by introducing a new definition of well-behaved distributions, we show that LinBUCB improves the regret rate of LinTS from $\tilde{O}(d^{3/2}\sqrt{T})$ to $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{T})$, matching the minimax optimal rate. To our knowledge, this work provides the first regret bounds in the setting of stochastic linear bandits with bounded approximate inference errors. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Shape-Constrained Distributional Optimization via Importance-Weighted Sample Average Approximation

Authors: Henry Lam, Zhenyuan Liu, Dashi I. Singham

Abstract: Shape-constrained optimization arises in a wide range of problems including distributionally robust optimization (DRO) that has surging popularity in recent years. In the DRO literature, these problems are usually solved via reduction into moment-constrained problems using the Choquet representation. While powerful, such an approach could face tractability challenges arising from the geometries an… ▽ More Shape-constrained optimization arises in a wide range of problems including distributionally robust optimization (DRO) that has surging popularity in recent years. In the DRO literature, these problems are usually solved via reduction into moment-constrained problems using the Choquet representation. While powerful, such an approach could face tractability challenges arising from the geometries and the compatibility between the shape and the objective function and moment constraints. In this paper, we propose an alternative methodology to solve shape-constrained optimization problems by integrating sample average approximation with importance sampling, the latter used to convert the distributional optimization into an optimization problem over the likelihood ratio with respect to a sampling distribution. We demonstrate how our approach, which relies on finite-dimensional linear programs, can handle a range of shape-constrained problems beyond the reach of previous Choquet-based reformulations, and entails vanishing and quantifiable optimality gaps. Moreover, our theoretical analyses based on strong duality and empirical processes reveal the critical role of shape constraints in guaranteeing desirable consistency and convergence rates. △ Less

Submitted 11 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Mallows-DPO: Fine-Tune Your LLM with Preference Dispersions

Authors: Haoxian Chen, Hanyang Zhao, Henry Lam, David Yao, Wenpin Tang

Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently emerged as a popular approach to improve reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), leading to better techniques to fine-tune large language models (LLM). A weakness of DPO, however, lies in its lack of capability to characterize the diversity of human preferences. Inspired by Mallows' theory of preference ranking, we develop in this paper… ▽ More Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently emerged as a popular approach to improve reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), leading to better techniques to fine-tune large language models (LLM). A weakness of DPO, however, lies in its lack of capability to characterize the diversity of human preferences. Inspired by Mallows' theory of preference ranking, we develop in this paper a new approach, the Mallows-DPO. A distinct feature of this approach is a dispersion index, which reflects the dispersion of human preference to prompts. We show that existing DPO models can be reduced to special cases of this dispersion index, thus unified with Mallows-DPO. More importantly, we demonstrate (empirically) how to use this dispersion index to enhance the performance of DPO in a broad array of benchmark tasks, from synthetic bandit selection to controllable generations and dialogues, while maintaining great generalization capabilities. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Bagging Improves Generalization Exponentially

Authors: Huajie Qian, Donghao Ying, Henry Lam, Wotao Yin

Abstract: Bagging is a popular ensemble technique to improve the accuracy of machine learning models. It hinges on the well-established rationale that, by repeatedly retraining on resampled data, the aggregated model exhibits lower variance and hence higher stability, especially for discontinuous base learners. In this paper, we provide a new perspective on bagging: By suitably aggregating the base learners… ▽ More Bagging is a popular ensemble technique to improve the accuracy of machine learning models. It hinges on the well-established rationale that, by repeatedly retraining on resampled data, the aggregated model exhibits lower variance and hence higher stability, especially for discontinuous base learners. In this paper, we provide a new perspective on bagging: By suitably aggregating the base learners at the parametrization instead of the output level, bagging improves generalization performances exponentially, a strength that is significantly more powerful than variance reduction. More precisely, we show that for general stochastic optimization problems that suffer from slowly (i.e., polynomially) decaying generalization errors, bagging can effectively reduce these errors to an exponential decay. Moreover, this power of bagging is agnostic to the solution schemes, including common empirical risk minimization, distributionally robust optimization, and various regularizations. We demonstrate how bagging can substantially improve generalization performances in a range of examples involving heavy-tailed data that suffer from intrinsically slow rates. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Correct author list typo

Quantifying Distributional Input Uncertainty via Inflated Kolmogorov-Smirnov Confidence Band

Authors: Motong Chen, Henry Lam, Zhenyuan Liu

Abstract: In stochastic simulation, input uncertainty refers to the propagation of the statistical noise in calibrating input models to impact output accuracy, in addition to the Monte Carlo simulation noise. The vast majority of the input uncertainty literature focuses on estimating target output quantities that are real-valued. However, outputs of simulation models are random and real-valued targets essen… ▽ More In stochastic simulation, input uncertainty refers to the propagation of the statistical noise in calibrating input models to impact output accuracy, in addition to the Monte Carlo simulation noise. The vast majority of the input uncertainty literature focuses on estimating target output quantities that are real-valued. However, outputs of simulation models are random and real-valued targets essentially serve only as summary statistics. To provide a more holistic assessment, we study the input uncertainty problem from a distributional view, namely we construct confidence bands for the entire output distribution function. Our approach utilizes a novel test statistic whose asymptotic consists of the supremum of the sum of a Brownian bridge and a suitable mean-zero Gaussian process, which generalizes the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic to account for input uncertainty. Regarding implementation, we also demonstrate how to use subsampling to efficiently estimate the covariance function of the Gaussian process, thereby leading to an implementable estimation of the quantile of the test statistic and a statistically valid confidence band. Numerical results demonstrate how our new confidence bands provide valid coverage for output distributions under input uncertainty that is not achievable by conventional approaches. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Resampling Stochastic Gradient Descent Cheaply for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification

Authors: Henry Lam, Zitong Wang

Abstract: Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) or stochastic approximation has been widely used in model training and stochastic optimization. While there is a huge literature on analyzing its convergence, inference on the obtained solutions from SGD has only been recently studied, yet is important due to the growing need for uncertainty quantification. We investigate two computationally cheap resampling-based… ▽ More Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) or stochastic approximation has been widely used in model training and stochastic optimization. While there is a huge literature on analyzing its convergence, inference on the obtained solutions from SGD has only been recently studied, yet is important due to the growing need for uncertainty quantification. We investigate two computationally cheap resampling-based methods to construct confidence intervals for SGD solutions. One uses multiple, but few, SGDs in parallel via resampling with replacement from the data, and another operates this in an online fashion. Our methods can be regarded as enhancements of established bootstrap schemes to substantially reduce the computation effort in terms of resampling requirements, while at the same time bypassing the intricate mixing conditions in existing batching methods. We achieve these via a recent so-called cheap bootstrap idea and Berry-Esseen-type bound for SGD. △ Less

Submitted 17 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization

Authors: Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam

Abstract: Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-… ▽ More Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable "randomized prior" construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2024; v1 submitted 15 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Smoothed $f$-Divergence Distributionally Robust Optimization

Authors: Zhenyuan Liu, Bart P. G. Van Parys, Henry Lam

Abstract: In data-driven optimization, sample average approximation (SAA) is known to suffer from the so-called optimizer's curse that causes an over-optimistic evaluation of the solution performance. We argue that a special type of distributionallly robust optimization (DRO) formulation offers theoretical advantages in correcting for this optimizer's curse compared to simple ``margin'' adjustments to SAA a… ▽ More In data-driven optimization, sample average approximation (SAA) is known to suffer from the so-called optimizer's curse that causes an over-optimistic evaluation of the solution performance. We argue that a special type of distributionallly robust optimization (DRO) formulation offers theoretical advantages in correcting for this optimizer's curse compared to simple ``margin'' adjustments to SAA and other DRO approaches: It attains a statistical bound on the out-of-sample performance, for a wide class of objective functions and distributions, that is nearly tightest in terms of exponential decay rate. This DRO uses an ambiguity set based on a Kullback Leibler (KL) divergence smoothed by the Wasserstein or Lévy-Prokhorov (LP) distance via a suitable distance optimization. Computationally, we also show that such a DRO, and its generalized versions using smoothed $f$-divergence, are not harder than DRO problems based on $f$-divergence or Wasserstein distances, rendering our DRO formulations both statistically optimal and computationally viable. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2023; v1 submitted 24 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

MSC Class: 90C15; 90C17; 90C25

Efficient Uncertainty Quantification and Reduction for Over-Parameterized Neural Networks

Authors: Ziyi Huang, Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang

Abstract: Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is important for reliability assessment and enhancement of machine learning models. In deep learning, uncertainties arise not only from data, but also from the training procedure that often injects substantial noises and biases. These hinder the attainment of statistical guarantees and, moreover, impose computational challenges on UQ due to the need for repeated net… ▽ More Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is important for reliability assessment and enhancement of machine learning models. In deep learning, uncertainties arise not only from data, but also from the training procedure that often injects substantial noises and biases. These hinder the attainment of statistical guarantees and, moreover, impose computational challenges on UQ due to the need for repeated network retraining. Building upon the recent neural tangent kernel theory, we create statistically guaranteed schemes to principally \emph{characterize}, and \emph{remove}, the uncertainty of over-parameterized neural networks with very low computation effort. In particular, our approach, based on what we call a procedural-noise-correcting (PNC) predictor, removes the procedural uncertainty by using only \emph{one} auxiliary network that is trained on a suitably labeled dataset, instead of many retrained networks employed in deep ensembles. Moreover, by combining our PNC predictor with suitable light-computation resampling methods, we build several approaches to construct asymptotically exact-coverage confidence intervals using as low as four trained networks without additional overheads. △ Less

Submitted 9 November, 2023; v1 submitted 9 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Short-term Temporal Dependency Detection under Heterogeneous Event Dynamic with Hawkes Processes

Authors: Yu Chen, Fengpei Li, Anderson Schneider, Yuriy Nevmyvaka, Asohan Amarasingham, Henry Lam

Abstract: Many event sequence data exhibit mutually exciting or inhibiting patterns. Reliable detection of such temporal dependency is crucial for scientific investigation. The de facto model is the Multivariate Hawkes Process (MHP), whose impact function naturally encodes a causal structure in Granger causality. However, the vast majority of existing methods use direct or nonlinear transform of standard MH… ▽ More Many event sequence data exhibit mutually exciting or inhibiting patterns. Reliable detection of such temporal dependency is crucial for scientific investigation. The de facto model is the Multivariate Hawkes Process (MHP), whose impact function naturally encodes a causal structure in Granger causality. However, the vast majority of existing methods use direct or nonlinear transform of standard MHP intensity with constant baseline, inconsistent with real-world data. Under irregular and unknown heterogeneous intensity, capturing temporal dependency is hard as one struggles to distinguish the effect of mutual interaction from that of intensity fluctuation. In this paper, we address the short-term temporal dependency detection issue. We show the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for cross-impact from MHP has an error that can not be eliminated but may be reduced by order of magnitude, using heterogeneous intensity not of the target HP but of the interacting HP. Then we proposed a robust and computationally-efficient method modified from MLE that does not rely on the prior estimation of the heterogeneous intensity and is thus applicable in a data-limited regime (e.g., few-shot, no repeated observations). Extensive experiments on various datasets show that our method outperforms existing ones by notable margins, with highlighted novel applications in neuroscience. △ Less

Submitted 28 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2023

Uncertainty Quantification and Confidence Intervals for Naive Rare-Event Estimators

Authors: Yuanlu Bai, Henry Lam

Abstract: We consider the estimation of rare-event probabilities using sample proportions output by naive Monte Carlo or collected data. Unlike using variance reduction techniques, this naive estimator does not have a priori relative efficiency guarantee. On the other hand, due to the recent surge of sophisticated rare-event problems arising in safety evaluations of intelligent systems, efficiency-guarantee… ▽ More We consider the estimation of rare-event probabilities using sample proportions output by naive Monte Carlo or collected data. Unlike using variance reduction techniques, this naive estimator does not have a priori relative efficiency guarantee. On the other hand, due to the recent surge of sophisticated rare-event problems arising in safety evaluations of intelligent systems, efficiency-guaranteed variance reduction may face implementation challenges which, coupled with the availability of computation or data collection power, motivate the use of such a naive estimator. In this paper we study the uncertainty quantification, namely the construction, coverage validity and tightness of confidence intervals, for rare-event probabilities using only sample proportions. In addition to the known normality, Wilson's and exact intervals, we investigate and compare them with two new intervals derived from Chernoff's inequality and the Berry-Esseen theorem. Moreover, we generalize our results to the natural situation where sampling stops by reaching a target number of rare-event hits. Our findings show that the normality and Wilson's intervals are not always valid, but they are close to the newly developed valid intervals in terms of half-width. In contrast, the exact interval is conservative, but safely guarantees the attainment of the nominal confidence level. Our new intervals, while being more conservative than the exact interval, provide useful insights in understanding the tightness of the considered intervals. △ Less

Submitted 26 April, 2024; v1 submitted 3 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Estimate-Then-Optimize versus Integrated-Estimation-Optimization versus Sample Average Approximation: A Stochastic Dominance Perspective

Authors: Adam N. Elmachtoub, Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang, Yunfan Zhao

Abstract: In data-driven stochastic optimization, model parameters of the underlying distribution need to be estimated from data in addition to the optimization task. Recent literature considers integrating the estimation and optimization processes by selecting model parameters that lead to the best empirical objective performance. This integrated approach, which we call integrated-estimation-optimization (… ▽ More In data-driven stochastic optimization, model parameters of the underlying distribution need to be estimated from data in addition to the optimization task. Recent literature considers integrating the estimation and optimization processes by selecting model parameters that lead to the best empirical objective performance. This integrated approach, which we call integrated-estimation-optimization (IEO), can be readily shown to outperform simple estimate-then-optimize (ETO) when the model is misspecified. In this paper, we show that a reverse behavior appears when the model class is well-specified and there is sufficient data. Specifically, for a general class of nonlinear stochastic optimization problems, we show that simple ETO outperforms IEO asymptotically when the model class covers the ground truth, in the strong sense of stochastic dominance of the regret. Namely, the entire distribution of the regret, not only its mean or other moments, is always better for ETO compared to IEO. Our results also apply to constrained, contextual optimization problems where the decision depends on observed features. Whenever applicable, we also demonstrate how standard sample average approximation (SAA) performs the worst when the model class is well-specified in terms of regret, and best when it is misspecified. Finally, we provide experimental results to support our theoretical comparisons and illustrate when our insights hold in finite-sample regimes and under various degrees of misspecification. △ Less

Submitted 6 August, 2023; v1 submitted 13 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

A Distributionally Robust Optimization Framework for Extreme Event Estimation

Authors: Yuanlu Bai, Henry Lam, Xinyu Zhang

Abstract: Conventional methods for extreme event estimation rely on well-chosen parametric models asymptotically justified from extreme value theory (EVT). These methods, while powerful and theoretically grounded, could however encounter a difficult bias-variance tradeoff that exacerbates especially when data size is too small, deteriorating the reliability of the tail estimation. In this paper, we study a… ▽ More Conventional methods for extreme event estimation rely on well-chosen parametric models asymptotically justified from extreme value theory (EVT). These methods, while powerful and theoretically grounded, could however encounter a difficult bias-variance tradeoff that exacerbates especially when data size is too small, deteriorating the reliability of the tail estimation. In this paper, we study a framework based on the recently surging literature of distributionally robust optimization. This approach can be viewed as a nonparametric alternative to conventional EVT, by imposing general shape belief on the tail instead of parametric assumption and using worst-case optimization as a resolution to handle the nonparametric uncertainty. We explain how this approach bypasses the bias-variance tradeoff in EVT. On the other hand, we face a conservativeness-variance tradeoff which we describe how to tackle. We also demonstrate computational tools for the involved optimization problems and compare our performance with conventional EVT across a range of numerical examples. △ Less

Submitted 3 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Adaptive Data Fusion for Multi-task Non-smooth Optimization

Authors: Henry Lam, Kaizheng Wang, Yuhang Wu, Yichen Zhang

Abstract: We study the problem of multi-task non-smooth optimization that arises ubiquitously in statistical learning, decision-making and risk management. We develop a data fusion approach that adaptively leverages commonalities among a large number of objectives to improve sample efficiency while tackling their unknown heterogeneities. We provide sharp statistical guarantees for our approach. Numerical ex… ▽ More We study the problem of multi-task non-smooth optimization that arises ubiquitously in statistical learning, decision-making and risk management. We develop a data fusion approach that adaptively leverages commonalities among a large number of objectives to improve sample efficiency while tackling their unknown heterogeneities. We provide sharp statistical guarantees for our approach. Numerical experiments on both synthetic and real data demonstrate significant advantages of our approach over benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 21 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: 25 pages

Bootstrap in High Dimension with Low Computation

Authors: Henry Lam, Zhenyuan Liu

Abstract: The bootstrap is a popular data-driven method to quantify statistical uncertainty, but for modern high-dimensional problems, it could suffer from huge computational costs due to the need to repeatedly generate resamples and refit models. We study the use of bootstraps in high-dimensional environments with a small number of resamples. In particular, we show that with a recent "cheap" bootstrap pers… ▽ More The bootstrap is a popular data-driven method to quantify statistical uncertainty, but for modern high-dimensional problems, it could suffer from huge computational costs due to the need to repeatedly generate resamples and refit models. We study the use of bootstraps in high-dimensional environments with a small number of resamples. In particular, we show that with a recent "cheap" bootstrap perspective, using a number of resamples as small as one could attain valid coverage even when the dimension grows closely with the sample size, thus strongly supporting the implementability of the bootstrap for large-scale problems. We validate our theoretical results and compare the performance of our approach with other benchmarks via a range of experiments. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2023; v1 submitted 19 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: Accepted to Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)

Evaluating Aleatoric Uncertainty via Conditional Generative Models

Authors: Ziyi Huang, Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang

Abstract: Aleatoric uncertainty quantification seeks for distributional knowledge of random responses, which is important for reliability analysis and robustness improvement in machine learning applications. Previous research on aleatoric uncertainty estimation mainly targets closed-formed conditional densities or variances, which requires strong restrictions on the data distribution or dimensionality. To o… ▽ More Aleatoric uncertainty quantification seeks for distributional knowledge of random responses, which is important for reliability analysis and robustness improvement in machine learning applications. Previous research on aleatoric uncertainty estimation mainly targets closed-formed conditional densities or variances, which requires strong restrictions on the data distribution or dimensionality. To overcome these restrictions, we study conditional generative models for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. We introduce two metrics to measure the discrepancy between two conditional distributions that suit these models. Both metrics can be easily and unbiasedly computed via Monte Carlo simulation of the conditional generative models, thus facilitating their evaluation and training. We demonstrate numerically how our metrics provide correct measurements of conditional distributional discrepancies and can be used to train conditional models competitive against existing benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 9 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Test Against High-Dimensional Uncertainties: Accelerated Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles with Deep Importance Sampling

Authors: Mansur Arief, Zhepeng Cen, Zhenyuan Liu, Zhiyuang Huang, Henry Lam, Bo Li, Ding Zhao

Abstract: Evaluating the performance of autonomous vehicles (AV) and their complex subsystems to high precision under naturalistic circumstances remains a challenge, especially when failure or dangerous cases are rare. Rarity does not only require an enormous sample size for a naive method to achieve high confidence estimation, but it also causes dangerous underestimation of the true failure rate and it is… ▽ More Evaluating the performance of autonomous vehicles (AV) and their complex subsystems to high precision under naturalistic circumstances remains a challenge, especially when failure or dangerous cases are rare. Rarity does not only require an enormous sample size for a naive method to achieve high confidence estimation, but it also causes dangerous underestimation of the true failure rate and it is extremely hard to detect. Meanwhile, the state-of-the-art approach that comes with a correctness guarantee can only compute an upper bound for the failure rate under certain conditions, which could limit its practical uses. In this work, we present Deep Importance Sampling (Deep IS) framework that utilizes a deep neural network to obtain an efficient IS that is on par with the state-of-the-art, capable of reducing the required sample size 43 times smaller than the naive sampling method to achieve 10% relative error and while producing an estimate that is much less conservative. Our high-dimensional experiment estimating the misclassification rate of one of the state-of-the-art traffic sign classifiers further reveals that this efficiency still holds true even when the target is very small, achieving over 600 times efficiency boost. This highlights the potential of Deep IS in providing a precise estimate even against high-dimensional uncertainties. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2022; v1 submitted 4 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Prediction Intervals for Simulation Metamodeling

Authors: Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang

Abstract: Simulation metamodeling refers to the construction of lower-fidelity models to represent input-output relations using few simulation runs. Stochastic kriging, which is based on Gaussian process, is a versatile and common technique for such a task. However, this approach relies on specific model assumptions and could encounter scalability challenges. In this paper, we study an alternative metamodel… ▽ More Simulation metamodeling refers to the construction of lower-fidelity models to represent input-output relations using few simulation runs. Stochastic kriging, which is based on Gaussian process, is a versatile and common technique for such a task. However, this approach relies on specific model assumptions and could encounter scalability challenges. In this paper, we study an alternative metamodeling approach using prediction intervals to capture the uncertainty of simulation outputs. We cast the metamodeling task as an empirical constrained optimization framework to train prediction intervals that attain accurate prediction coverage and narrow width. We specifically use neural network to represent these intervals and discuss procedures to approximately solve this optimization problem. We also present an adaptation of conformal prediction tools as another approach to construct prediction intervals for metamodeling. Lastly, we present a validation machinery and show how our method can enjoy a distribution-free finite-sample guarantee on the prediction performance. We demonstrate and compare our proposed approaches with existing methods including stochastic kriging through numerical examples. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

A Cheap Bootstrap Method for Fast Inference

Authors: Henry Lam

Abstract: The bootstrap is a versatile inference method that has proven powerful in many statistical problems. However, when applied to modern large-scale models, it could face substantial computation demand from repeated data resampling and model fitting. We present a bootstrap methodology that uses minimal computation, namely with a resample effort as low as one Monte Carlo replication, while maintaining… ▽ More The bootstrap is a versatile inference method that has proven powerful in many statistical problems. However, when applied to modern large-scale models, it could face substantial computation demand from repeated data resampling and model fitting. We present a bootstrap methodology that uses minimal computation, namely with a resample effort as low as one Monte Carlo replication, while maintaining desirable statistical guarantees. We present the theory of this method that uses a twisted perspective from the standard bootstrap principle. We also present generalizations of this method to nested sampling problems and to a range of subsampling variants, and illustrate how it can be used for fast inference across different estimation problems. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Optimal Regret Is Achievable with Bounded Approximate Inference Error: An Enhanced Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound Framework

Authors: Ziyi Huang, Henry Lam, Amirhossein Meisami, Haofeng Zhang

Abstract: Bayesian bandit algorithms with approximate Bayesian inference have been widely used in real-world applications. However, there is a large discrepancy between the superior practical performance of these approaches and their theoretical justification. Previous research only indicates a negative theoretical result: Thompson sampling could have a worst-case linear regret $Ω(T)$ with a constant thresh… ▽ More Bayesian bandit algorithms with approximate Bayesian inference have been widely used in real-world applications. However, there is a large discrepancy between the superior practical performance of these approaches and their theoretical justification. Previous research only indicates a negative theoretical result: Thompson sampling could have a worst-case linear regret $Ω(T)$ with a constant threshold on the inference error measured by one $α$-divergence. To bridge this gap, we propose an Enhanced Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound (EBUCB) framework that can efficiently accommodate bandit problems in the presence of approximate inference. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that for Bernoulli multi-armed bandits, EBUCB can achieve the optimal regret order $O(\log T)$ if the inference error measured by two different $α$-divergences is less than a constant, regardless of how large this constant is. To our best knowledge, our study provides the first theoretical regret bound that is better than $o(T)$ in the setting of constant approximate inference error. Furthermore, in concordance with the negative results in previous studies, we show that only one bounded $α$-divergence is insufficient to guarantee a sub-linear regret. △ Less

Submitted 9 November, 2023; v1 submitted 30 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Efficient Calibration of Multi-Agent Simulation Models from Output Series with Bayesian Optimization

Authors: Yuanlu Bai, Henry Lam, Svitlana Vyetrenko, Tucker Balch

Abstract: Multi-agent simulation is commonly used across multiple disciplines, specifically in artificial intelligence in recent years, which creates an environment for downstream machine learning or reinforcement learning tasks. In many practical scenarios, however, only the output series that result from the interactions of simulation agents are observable. Therefore, simulators need to be calibrated so t… ▽ More Multi-agent simulation is commonly used across multiple disciplines, specifically in artificial intelligence in recent years, which creates an environment for downstream machine learning or reinforcement learning tasks. In many practical scenarios, however, only the output series that result from the interactions of simulation agents are observable. Therefore, simulators need to be calibrated so that the simulated output series resemble historical -- which amounts to solving a complex simulation optimization problem. In this paper, we propose a simple and efficient framework for calibrating simulator parameters from historical output series observations. First, we consider a novel concept of eligibility set to bypass the potential non-identifiability issue. Second, we generalize the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test with Bonferroni correction to test the similarity between two high-dimensional distributions, which gives a simple yet effective distance metric between the output series sample sets. Third, we suggest using Bayesian optimization (BO) and trust-region BO (TuRBO) to minimize the aforementioned distance metric. Finally, we demonstrate the efficiency of our framework using numerical experiments both on a multi-agent financial market simulator. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2022; v1 submitted 3 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: This paper has been accepted and will be published in ICAIF 2022 proceedings

Orthounimodal Distributionally Robust Optimization: Representation, Computation and Multivariate Extreme Event Applications

Authors: Henry Lam, Zhenyuan Liu, Xinyu Zhang

Abstract: This paper studies a basic notion of distributional shape known as orthounimodality (OU) and its use in shape-constrained distributionally robust optimization (DRO). As a key motivation, we argue how such type of DRO is well-suited to tackle multivariate extreme event estimation by giving statistically valid confidence bounds on target extremal probabilities. In particular, we explain how DRO can… ▽ More This paper studies a basic notion of distributional shape known as orthounimodality (OU) and its use in shape-constrained distributionally robust optimization (DRO). As a key motivation, we argue how such type of DRO is well-suited to tackle multivariate extreme event estimation by giving statistically valid confidence bounds on target extremal probabilities. In particular, we explain how DRO can be used as a nonparametric alternative to conventional extreme value theory that extrapolates tails based on theoretical limiting distributions, which could face challenges in bias-variance control and other technical complications. We also explain how OU resolves the challenges in interpretability and robustness faced by existing distributional shape notions used in the DRO literature. Methodologically, we characterize the extreme points of the OU distribution class in terms of what we call OU sets and build a corresponding Choquet representation, which subsequently allows us to reduce OU-DRO into moment problems over infinite-dimensional random variables. We then develop, in the bivariate setting, a geometric approach to reduce such moment problems into finite dimension via a specially constructed variational problem designed to eliminate suboptimal solutions. Numerical results illustrate how our approach gives rise to valid and competitive confidence bounds for extremal probabilities. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Higher-Order Coverage Errors of Batching Methods via Edgeworth Expansions on $t$-Statistics

Authors: Shengyi He, Henry Lam

Abstract: While batching methods have been widely used in simulation and statistics, it is open regarding their higher-order coverage behaviors and whether one variant is better than the others in this regard. We develop techniques to obtain higher-order coverage errors for batching methods by building Edgeworth-type expansions on $t$-statistics. The coefficients in these expansions are intricate analytical… ▽ More While batching methods have been widely used in simulation and statistics, it is open regarding their higher-order coverage behaviors and whether one variant is better than the others in this regard. We develop techniques to obtain higher-order coverage errors for batching methods by building Edgeworth-type expansions on $t$-statistics. The coefficients in these expansions are intricate analytically, but we provide algorithms to estimate the coefficients of the $n^{-1}$ error term via Monte Carlo simulation. We provide insights on the effect of the number of batches on the coverage error where we demonstrate generally non-monotonic relations. We also compare different batching methods both theoretically and numerically, and argue that none of the methods is uniformly better than the others in terms of coverage. However, when the number of batches is large, sectioned jackknife has the best coverage among all. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Certifiable Deep Importance Sampling for Rare-Event Simulation of Black-Box Systems

Authors: Mansur Arief, Yuanlu Bai, Wenhao Ding, Shengyi He, Zhiyuan Huang, Henry Lam, Ding Zhao

Abstract: Rare-event simulation techniques, such as importance sampling (IS), constitute powerful tools to speed up challenging estimation of rare catastrophic events. These techniques often leverage the knowledge and analysis on underlying system structures to endow desirable efficiency guarantees. However, black-box problems, especially those arising from recent safety-critical applications of AI-driven p… ▽ More Rare-event simulation techniques, such as importance sampling (IS), constitute powerful tools to speed up challenging estimation of rare catastrophic events. These techniques often leverage the knowledge and analysis on underlying system structures to endow desirable efficiency guarantees. However, black-box problems, especially those arising from recent safety-critical applications of AI-driven physical systems, can fundamentally undermine their efficiency guarantees and lead to dangerous under-estimation without diagnostically detected. We propose a framework called Deep Probabilistic Accelerated Evaluation (Deep-PrAE) to design statistically guaranteed IS, by converting black-box samplers that are versatile but could lack guarantees, into one with what we call a relaxed efficiency certificate that allows accurate estimation of bounds on the rare-event probability. We present the theory of Deep-PrAE that combines the dominating point concept with rare-event set learning via deep neural network classifiers, and demonstrate its effectiveness in numerical examples including the safety-testing of intelligent driving algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: The conference version of this paper has appeared in AISTATS 2021 (arXiv:2006.15722)

Over-Conservativeness of Variance-Based Efficiency Criteria and Probabilistic Efficiency in Rare-Event Simulation

Authors: Yuanlu Bai, Zhiyuan Huang, Henry Lam, Ding Zhao

Abstract: In rare-event simulation, an importance sampling (IS) estimator is regarded as efficient if its relative error, namely the ratio between its standard deviation and mean, is sufficiently controlled. It is widely known that when a rare-event set contains multiple "important regions" encoded by the so-called dominating points, IS needs to account for all of them via mixing to achieve efficiency. We a… ▽ More In rare-event simulation, an importance sampling (IS) estimator is regarded as efficient if its relative error, namely the ratio between its standard deviation and mean, is sufficiently controlled. It is widely known that when a rare-event set contains multiple "important regions" encoded by the so-called dominating points, IS needs to account for all of them via mixing to achieve efficiency. We argue that in typical experiments, missing less significant dominating points may not necessarily cause inefficiency, and the traditional analysis recipe could suffer from intrinsic looseness by using relative error, or in turn estimation variance, as an efficiency criterion. We propose a new efficiency notion, which we call probabilistic efficiency, to tighten this gap. In particular, we show that under the standard Gartner-Ellis large deviations regime, an IS that uses only the most significant dominating points is sufficient to attain this efficiency notion. Our finding is especially relevant in high-dimensional settings where the computational effort to locate all dominating points is enormous. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2022; v1 submitted 24 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Doubly Robust Stein-Kernelized Monte Carlo Estimator: Simultaneous Bias-Variance Reduction and Supercanonical Convergence

Authors: Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang

Abstract: Standard Monte Carlo computation is widely known to exhibit a canonical square-root convergence speed in terms of sample size. Two recent techniques, one based on control variate and one on importance sampling, both derived from an integration of reproducing kernels and Stein's identity, have been proposed to reduce the error in Monte Carlo computation to supercanonical convergence. This paper pre… ▽ More Standard Monte Carlo computation is widely known to exhibit a canonical square-root convergence speed in terms of sample size. Two recent techniques, one based on control variate and one on importance sampling, both derived from an integration of reproducing kernels and Stein's identity, have been proposed to reduce the error in Monte Carlo computation to supercanonical convergence. This paper presents a more general framework to encompass both techniques that is especially beneficial when the sample generator is biased and noise-corrupted. We show our general estimator, which we call the doubly robust Stein-kernelized estimator, outperforms both existing methods in terms of mean squared error rates across different scenarios. We also demonstrate the superior performance of our method via numerical examples. △ Less

Submitted 9 March, 2023; v1 submitted 23 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Quantifying Epistemic Uncertainty in Deep Learning

Authors: Ziyi Huang, Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang

Abstract: Uncertainty quantification is at the core of the reliability and robustness of machine learning. In this paper, we provide a theoretical framework to dissect the uncertainty, especially the \textit{epistemic} component, in deep learning into \textit{procedural variability} (from the training procedure) and \textit{data variability} (from the training data), which is the first such attempt in the l… ▽ More Uncertainty quantification is at the core of the reliability and robustness of machine learning. In this paper, we provide a theoretical framework to dissect the uncertainty, especially the \textit{epistemic} component, in deep learning into \textit{procedural variability} (from the training procedure) and \textit{data variability} (from the training data), which is the first such attempt in the literature to our best knowledge. We then propose two approaches to estimate these uncertainties, one based on influence function and one on batching. We demonstrate how our approaches overcome the computational difficulties in applying classical statistical methods. Experimental evaluations on multiple problem settings corroborate our theory and illustrate how our framework and estimation can provide direct guidance on modeling and data collection efforts. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2023; v1 submitted 22 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Higher-Order Expansion and Bartlett Correctability of Distributionally Robust Optimization

Authors: Shengyi He, Henry Lam

Abstract: Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) is a worst-case framework for stochastic optimization under uncertainty that has drawn fast-growing studies in recent years. When the underlying probability distribution is unknown and observed from data, DRO suggests to compute the worst-case distribution within a so-called uncertainty set that captures the involved statistical uncertainty. In particular… ▽ More Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) is a worst-case framework for stochastic optimization under uncertainty that has drawn fast-growing studies in recent years. When the underlying probability distribution is unknown and observed from data, DRO suggests to compute the worst-case distribution within a so-called uncertainty set that captures the involved statistical uncertainty. In particular, DRO with uncertainty set constructed as a statistical divergence neighborhood ball has been shown to provide a tool for constructing valid confidence intervals for nonparametric functionals, and bears a duality with the empirical likelihood (EL). In this paper, we show how adjusting the ball size of such type of DRO can reduce higher-order coverage errors similar to the Bartlett correction. Our correction, which applies to general von Mises differentiable functionals, is more general than the existing EL literature that only focuses on smooth function models or $M$-estimation. Moreover, we demonstrate a higher-order "self-normalizing" property of DRO regardless of the choice of divergence. Our approach builds on the development of a higher-order expansion of DRO, which is obtained through an asymptotic analysis on a fixed point equation arising from the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions. △ Less

Submitted 11 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Generalization Bounds with Minimal Dependency on Hypothesis Class via Distributionally Robust Optimization

Authors: Yibo Zeng, Henry Lam

Abstract: Established approaches to obtain generalization bounds in data-driven optimization and machine learning mostly build on solutions from empirical risk minimization (ERM), which depend crucially on the functional complexity of the hypothesis class. In this paper, we present an alternate route to obtain these bounds on the solution from distributionally robust optimization (DRO), a recent data-driven… ▽ More Established approaches to obtain generalization bounds in data-driven optimization and machine learning mostly build on solutions from empirical risk minimization (ERM), which depend crucially on the functional complexity of the hypothesis class. In this paper, we present an alternate route to obtain these bounds on the solution from distributionally robust optimization (DRO), a recent data-driven optimization framework based on worst-case analysis and the notion of ambiguity set to capture statistical uncertainty. In contrast to the hypothesis class complexity in ERM, our DRO bounds depend on the ambiguity set geometry and its compatibility with the true loss function. Notably, when using statistical distances such as maximum mean discrepancy, Wasserstein distance, or $φ$-divergence in the DRO, our analysis implies generalization bounds whose dependence on the hypothesis class appears the minimal possible: The bound depends solely on the true loss function, independent of any other candidates in the hypothesis class. To our best knowledge, it is the first generalization bound of this type in the literature, and we hope our findings can open the door for a better understanding of DRO, especially its benefits on loss minimization and other machine learning applications. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2022; v1 submitted 21 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: Accepted by NeurIPS 2022

On the Impossibility of Statistically Improving Empirical Optimization: A Second-Order Stochastic Dominance Perspective

Authors: Henry Lam

Abstract: When the underlying probability distribution in a stochastic optimization is observed only through data, various data-driven formulations have been studied to obtain approximate optimal solutions. We show that no such formulations can, in a sense, theoretically improve the statistical quality of the solution obtained from empirical optimization. We argue this by proving that the first-order behavi… ▽ More When the underlying probability distribution in a stochastic optimization is observed only through data, various data-driven formulations have been studied to obtain approximate optimal solutions. We show that no such formulations can, in a sense, theoretically improve the statistical quality of the solution obtained from empirical optimization. We argue this by proving that the first-order behavior of the optimality gap against the oracle best solution, which includes both the bias and variance, for any data-driven solution is second-order stochastically dominated by empirical optimization, as long as suitable smoothness holds with respect to the underlying distribution. We demonstrate this impossibility of improvement in a range of examples including regularized optimization, distributionally robust optimization, parametric optimization and Bayesian generalizations. We also discuss the connections of our results to semiparametric statistical inference and other perspectives in the data-driven optimization literature. △ Less

Submitted 27 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Calibrating Over-Parametrized Simulation Models: A Framework via Eligibility Set

Authors: Yuanlu Bai, Tucker Balch, Haoxian Chen, Danial Dervovic, Henry Lam, Svitlana Vyetrenko

Abstract: Stochastic simulation aims to compute output performance for complex models that lack analytical tractability. To ensure accurate prediction, the model needs to be calibrated and validated against real data. Conventional methods approach these tasks by assessing the model-data match via simple hypothesis tests or distance minimization in an ad hoc fashion, but they can encounter challenges arising… ▽ More Stochastic simulation aims to compute output performance for complex models that lack analytical tractability. To ensure accurate prediction, the model needs to be calibrated and validated against real data. Conventional methods approach these tasks by assessing the model-data match via simple hypothesis tests or distance minimization in an ad hoc fashion, but they can encounter challenges arising from non-identifiability and high dimensionality. In this paper, we investigate a framework to develop calibration schemes that satisfy rigorous frequentist statistical guarantees, via a basic notion that we call eligibility set designed to bypass non-identifiability via a set-based estimation. We investigate a feature extraction-then-aggregation approach to construct these sets that target at multivariate outputs. We demonstrate our methodology on several numerical examples, including an application to calibration of a limit order book market simulator (ABIDES). △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Distributionally Constrained Black-Box Stochastic Gradient Estimation and Optimization

Authors: Henry Lam, Junhui Zhang

Abstract: We consider stochastic gradient estimation using only black-box function evaluations, where the function argument lies within a probability simplex. This problem is motivated from gradient-descent optimization procedures in multiple applications in distributionally robust analysis and inverse model calibration involving decision variables that are probability distributions. We are especially inter… ▽ More We consider stochastic gradient estimation using only black-box function evaluations, where the function argument lies within a probability simplex. This problem is motivated from gradient-descent optimization procedures in multiple applications in distributionally robust analysis and inverse model calibration involving decision variables that are probability distributions. We are especially interested in obtaining gradient estimators where one or few sample observations or simulation runs apply simultaneously to all directions. Conventional zeroth-order gradient schemes such as simultaneous perturbation face challenges as the required moment conditions that allow the "canceling" of higher-order biases cannot be satisfied without violating the simplex constraints. We investigate a new set of required conditions on the random perturbation generator, which leads us to a class of implementable gradient estimators using Dirichlet mixtures. We study the statistical properties of these estimators and their utility in constrained stochastic approximation, including both Frank-Wolfe and mirror descent update schemes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our procedures and compare with benchmarks via several numerical examples. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Learning Prediction Intervals for Regression: Generalization and Calibration

Authors: Haoxian Chen, Ziyi Huang, Henry Lam, Huajie Qian, Haofeng Zhang

Abstract: We study the generation of prediction intervals in regression for uncertainty quantification. This task can be formalized as an empirical constrained optimization problem that minimizes the average interval width while maintaining the coverage accuracy across data. We strengthen the existing literature by studying two aspects of this empirical optimization. First is a general learning theory to ch… ▽ More We study the generation of prediction intervals in regression for uncertainty quantification. This task can be formalized as an empirical constrained optimization problem that minimizes the average interval width while maintaining the coverage accuracy across data. We strengthen the existing literature by studying two aspects of this empirical optimization. First is a general learning theory to characterize the optimality-feasibility tradeoff that encompasses Lipschitz continuity and VC-subgraph classes, which are exemplified in regression trees and neural networks. Second is a calibration machinery and the corresponding statistical theory to optimally select the regularization parameter that manages this tradeoff, which bypasses the overfitting issues in previous approaches in coverage attainment. We empirically demonstrate the strengths of our interval generation and calibration algorithms in terms of testing performances compared to existing benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 26 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Adaptive Importance Sampling for Efficient Stochastic Root Finding and Quantile Estimation

Authors: Shengyi He, Guangxin Jiang, Henry Lam, Michael C. Fu

Abstract: In solving simulation-based stochastic root-finding or optimization problems that involve rare events, such as in extreme quantile estimation, running crude Monte Carlo can be prohibitively inefficient. To address this issue, importance sampling can be employed to drive down the sampling error to a desirable level. However, selecting a good importance sampler requires knowledge of the solution to… ▽ More In solving simulation-based stochastic root-finding or optimization problems that involve rare events, such as in extreme quantile estimation, running crude Monte Carlo can be prohibitively inefficient. To address this issue, importance sampling can be employed to drive down the sampling error to a desirable level. However, selecting a good importance sampler requires knowledge of the solution to the problem at hand, which is the goal to begin with and thus forms a circular challenge. We investigate the use of adaptive importance sampling to untie this circularity. Our procedure sequentially updates the importance sampler to reach the optimal sampler and the optimal solution simultaneously, and can be embedded in both sample average approximation and stochastic approximation-type algorithms. Our theoretical analysis establishes strong consistency and asymptotic normality of the resulting estimators. We also demonstrate, via a minimax perspective, the key role of using adaptivity in controlling asymptotic errors. Finally, we illustrate the effectiveness of our approach via numerical experiments. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Model Calibration via Distributionally Robust Optimization: On the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge

Authors: Yuanlu Bai, Zhiyuan Huang, Henry Lam

Abstract: We study a methodology to tackle the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge, a model calibration problem under both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. Our methodology is based on an integration of robust optimization, more specifically a recent line of research known as distributionally robust optimization, and importance sampling in Monte Carlo simulation. The main computation machi… ▽ More We study a methodology to tackle the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge, a model calibration problem under both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. Our methodology is based on an integration of robust optimization, more specifically a recent line of research known as distributionally robust optimization, and importance sampling in Monte Carlo simulation. The main computation machinery in this integrated methodology amounts to solving sampled linear programs. We present theoretical statistical guarantees of our approach via connections to nonparametric hypothesis testing, and numerical performances including parameter calibration and downstream decision and risk evaluation tasks. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2006.15689

Efficient Learning for Clustering and Optimizing Context-Dependent Designs

Authors: Haidong Li, Henry Lam, Yijie Peng

Abstract: We consider a simulation optimization problem for a context-dependent decision-making. A Gaussian mixture model is proposed to capture the performance clustering phenomena of context-dependent designs. Under a Bayesian framework, we develop a dynamic sampling policy to efficiently learn both the global information of each cluster and local information of each design for selecting the best designs… ▽ More We consider a simulation optimization problem for a context-dependent decision-making. A Gaussian mixture model is proposed to capture the performance clustering phenomena of context-dependent designs. Under a Bayesian framework, we develop a dynamic sampling policy to efficiently learn both the global information of each cluster and local information of each design for selecting the best designs in all contexts. The proposed sampling policy is proved to be consistent and achieve the asymptotically optimal sampling ratio. Numerical experiments show that the proposed sampling policy significantly improves the efficiency in context-dependent simulation optimization. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2020; v1 submitted 10 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Context-dependent Ranking and Selection under a Bayesian Framework

Authors: Haidong Li, Henry Lam, Zhe Liang, Yijie Peng

Abstract: We consider a context-dependent ranking and selection problem. The best design is not universal but depends on the contexts. Under a Bayesian framework, we develop a dynamic sampling scheme for context-dependent optimization (DSCO) to efficiently learn and select the best designs in all contexts. The proposed sampling scheme is proved to be consistent. Numerical experiments show that the proposed… ▽ More We consider a context-dependent ranking and selection problem. The best design is not universal but depends on the contexts. Under a Bayesian framework, we develop a dynamic sampling scheme for context-dependent optimization (DSCO) to efficiently learn and select the best designs in all contexts. The proposed sampling scheme is proved to be consistent. Numerical experiments show that the proposed sampling scheme significantly improves the efficiency in context-dependent ranking and selection. △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2020; v1 submitted 10 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: The article was published without the co-Author's notice, and it is withdrawn due to his objection

Rare-Event Simulation for Neural Network and Random Forest Predictors

Authors: Yuanlu Bai, Zhiyuan Huang, Henry Lam, Ding Zhao

Abstract: We study rare-event simulation for a class of problems where the target hitting sets of interest are defined via modern machine learning tools such as neural networks and random forests. This problem is motivated from fast emerging studies on the safety evaluation of intelligent systems, robustness quantification of learning models, and other potential applications to large-scale simulation in whi… ▽ More We study rare-event simulation for a class of problems where the target hitting sets of interest are defined via modern machine learning tools such as neural networks and random forests. This problem is motivated from fast emerging studies on the safety evaluation of intelligent systems, robustness quantification of learning models, and other potential applications to large-scale simulation in which machine learning tools can be used to approximate complex rare-event set boundaries. We investigate an importance sampling scheme that integrates the dominating point machinery in large deviations and sequential mixed integer programming to locate the underlying dominating points. Our approach works for a range of neural network architectures including fully connected layers, rectified linear units, normalization, pooling and convolutional layers, and random forests built from standard decision trees. We provide efficiency guarantees and numerical demonstration of our approach using a classification model in the UCI Machine Learning Repository. △ Less

Submitted 9 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Minimax Efficient Finite-Difference Stochastic Gradient Estimators Using Black-Box Function Evaluations

Authors: Henry Lam, Haidong Li, Xuhui Zhang

Abstract: Standard approaches to stochastic gradient estimation, with only noisy black-box function evaluations, use the finite-difference method or its variants. While natural, it is open to our knowledge whether their statistical accuracy is the best possible. This paper argues so by showing that central finite-difference is a nearly minimax optimal zeroth-order gradient estimator for a suitable class of… ▽ More Standard approaches to stochastic gradient estimation, with only noisy black-box function evaluations, use the finite-difference method or its variants. While natural, it is open to our knowledge whether their statistical accuracy is the best possible. This paper argues so by showing that central finite-difference is a nearly minimax optimal zeroth-order gradient estimator for a suitable class of objective functions and mean squared risk, among both the class of linear estimators and the much larger class of all (nonlinear) estimators. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2020; v1 submitted 8 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Deep Probabilistic Accelerated Evaluation: A Robust Certifiable Rare-Event Simulation Methodology for Black-Box Safety-Critical Systems

Authors: Mansur Arief, Zhiyuan Huang, Guru Koushik Senthil Kumar, Yuanlu Bai, Shengyi He, Wenhao Ding, Henry Lam, Ding Zhao

Abstract: Evaluating the reliability of intelligent physical systems against rare safety-critical events poses a huge testing burden for real-world applications. Simulation provides a useful platform to evaluate the extremal risks of these systems before their deployments. Importance Sampling (IS), while proven to be powerful for rare-event simulation, faces challenges in handling these learning-based syste… ▽ More Evaluating the reliability of intelligent physical systems against rare safety-critical events poses a huge testing burden for real-world applications. Simulation provides a useful platform to evaluate the extremal risks of these systems before their deployments. Importance Sampling (IS), while proven to be powerful for rare-event simulation, faces challenges in handling these learning-based systems due to their black-box nature that fundamentally undermines its efficiency guarantee, which can lead to under-estimation without diagnostically detected. We propose a framework called Deep Probabilistic Accelerated Evaluation (Deep-PrAE) to design statistically guaranteed IS, by converting black-box samplers that are versatile but could lack guarantees, into one with what we call a relaxed efficiency certificate that allows accurate estimation of bounds on the safety-critical event probability. We present the theory of Deep-PrAE that combines the dominating point concept with rare-event set learning via deep neural network classifiers, and demonstrate its effectiveness in numerical examples including the safety-testing of an intelligent driving algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2021; v1 submitted 28 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

A Distributionally Robust Optimization Approach to the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge

Authors: Yuanlu Bai, Zhiyuan Huang, Henry Lam

Abstract: We study a methodology to tackle the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge problem, based on an integration of robust optimization, more specifically a recent line of research known as distributionally robust optimization, and importance sampling in Monte Carlo simulation. The main computation machinery in this integrated methodology boils down to solving sampled linear programs. We wi… ▽ More We study a methodology to tackle the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge problem, based on an integration of robust optimization, more specifically a recent line of research known as distributionally robust optimization, and importance sampling in Monte Carlo simulation. The main computation machinery in this integrated methodology boils down to solving sampled linear programs. We will illustrate both our numerical performances and theoretical statistical guarantees obtained via connections to nonparametric hypothesis testing. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: Published in the Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and the 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference

Channel Assignment in Uplink Wireless Communication using Machine Learning Approach

Authors: Guangyu Jia, Zhaohui Yang, Hak-Keung Lam, Jianfeng Shi, Mohammad Shikh-Bahaei

Abstract: This letter investigates a channel assignment problem in uplink wireless communication systems. Our goal is to maximize the sum rate of all users subject to integer channel assignment constraints. A convex optimization based algorithm is provided to obtain the optimal channel assignment, where the closed-form solution is obtained in each step. Due to high computational complexity in the convex opt… ▽ More This letter investigates a channel assignment problem in uplink wireless communication systems. Our goal is to maximize the sum rate of all users subject to integer channel assignment constraints. A convex optimization based algorithm is provided to obtain the optimal channel assignment, where the closed-form solution is obtained in each step. Due to high computational complexity in the convex optimization based algorithm, machine learning approaches are employed to obtain computational efficient solutions. More specifically, the data are generated by using convex optimization based algorithm and the original problem is converted to a regression problem which is addressed by the integration of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), feed-forward neural networks (FNNs), random forest and gated recurrent unit networks (GRUs). The results demonstrate that the machine learning method largely reduces the computation time with slightly compromising of prediction accuracy. △ Less

Submitted 12 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Robust Importance Weighting for Covariate Shift

Authors: Henry Lam, Fengpei Li, Siddharth Prusty

Abstract: In many learning problems, the training and testing data follow different distributions and a particularly common situation is the \textit{covariate shift}. To correct for sampling biases, most approaches, including the popular kernel mean matching (KMM), focus on estimating the importance weights between the two distributions. Reweighting-based methods, however, are exposed to high variance when… ▽ More In many learning problems, the training and testing data follow different distributions and a particularly common situation is the \textit{covariate shift}. To correct for sampling biases, most approaches, including the popular kernel mean matching (KMM), focus on estimating the importance weights between the two distributions. Reweighting-based methods, however, are exposed to high variance when the distributional discrepancy is large and the weights are poorly estimated. On the other hand, the alternate approach of using nonparametric regression (NR) incurs high bias when the training size is limited. In this paper, we propose and analyze a new estimator that systematically integrates the residuals of NR with KMM reweighting, based on a control-variate perspective. The proposed estimator can be shown to either strictly outperform or match the best-known existing rates for both KMM and NR, and thus is a robust combination of both estimators. The experiments shows the estimator works well in practice. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2020; v1 submitted 14 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Uncertainty Quantification and Exploration for Reinforcement Learning

Authors: YI Zhu, **g Dong, Henry Lam

Abstract: We investigate statistical uncertainty quantification for reinforcement learning (RL) and its implications in exploration policy. Despite ever-growing literature on RL applications, fundamental questions about inference and error quantification, such as large-sample behaviors, appear to remain quite open. In this paper, we fill in the literature gap by studying the central limit theorem behaviors… ▽ More We investigate statistical uncertainty quantification for reinforcement learning (RL) and its implications in exploration policy. Despite ever-growing literature on RL applications, fundamental questions about inference and error quantification, such as large-sample behaviors, appear to remain quite open. In this paper, we fill in the literature gap by studying the central limit theorem behaviors of estimated Q-values and value functions under various RL settings. In particular, we explicitly identify closed-form expressions of the asymptotic variances, which allow us to efficiently construct asymptotically valid confidence regions for key RL quantities. Furthermore, we utilize these asymptotic expressions to design an effective exploration strategy, which we call Q-value-based Optimal Computing Budget Allocation (Q-OCBA). The policy relies on maximizing the relative discrepancies among the Q-value estimates. Numerical experiments show superior performances of our exploration strategy than other benchmark policies. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2022; v1 submitted 11 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Compressing Weight-updates for Image Artifacts Removal Neural Networks

Authors: Yat Hong Lam, Alireza Zare, Caglar Aytekin, Francesco Cricri, Jani Lainema, Emre Aksu, Miska Hannuksela

Abstract: In this paper, we present a novel approach for fine-tuning a decoder-side neural network in the context of image compression, such that the weight-updates are better compressible. At encoder side, we fine-tune a pre-trained artifact removal network on target data by using a compression objective applied on the weight-update. In particular, the compression objective encourages weight-updates which… ▽ More In this paper, we present a novel approach for fine-tuning a decoder-side neural network in the context of image compression, such that the weight-updates are better compressible. At encoder side, we fine-tune a pre-trained artifact removal network on target data by using a compression objective applied on the weight-update. In particular, the compression objective encourages weight-updates which are sparse and closer to quantized values. This way, the final weight-update can be compressed more efficiently by pruning and quantization, and can be included into the encoded bitstream together with the image bitstream of a traditional codec. We show that this approach achieves reconstruction quality which is on-par or slightly superior to a traditional codec, at comparable bitrates. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to combine image compression and neural network's weight update compression. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2019; v1 submitted 10 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: Submission for CHALLENGE ON LEARNED IMAGE COMPRESSION (CLIC) 2019 (updated on 14 June 2019)

Evaluation Uncertainty in Data-Driven Self-Driving Testing

Authors: Zhiyuan Huang, Mansur Arief, Henry Lam, Ding Zhao

Abstract: Safety evaluation of self-driving technologies has been extensively studied. One recent approach uses Monte Carlo based evaluation to estimate the occurrence probabilities of safety-critical events as safety measures. These Monte Carlo samples are generated from stochastic input models constructed based on real-world data. In this paper, we propose an approach to assess the impact on the probabili… ▽ More Safety evaluation of self-driving technologies has been extensively studied. One recent approach uses Monte Carlo based evaluation to estimate the occurrence probabilities of safety-critical events as safety measures. These Monte Carlo samples are generated from stochastic input models constructed based on real-world data. In this paper, we propose an approach to assess the impact on the probability estimates from the evaluation procedures due to the estimation error caused by data variability. Our proposed method merges the classical bootstrap method for estimating input uncertainty with a likelihood ratio based scheme to reuse experiment outputs. This approach is economical and efficient in terms of implementation costs in assessing input uncertainty for the evaluation of self-driving technology. We use an example in autonomous vehicle (AV) safety evaluation to demonstrate the proposed approach as a diagnostic tool for the quality of the fitted input model. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2019; v1 submitted 19 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Enhanced Balancing of Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Stochastic Estimation: A Minimax Perspective

Authors: Henry Lam, Xinyu Zhang, Xuhui Zhang

Abstract: Biased stochastic estimators, such as finite-differences for noisy gradient estimation, often contain parameters that need to be properly chosen to balance impacts from the bias and the variance. While the optimal order of these parameters in terms of the simulation budget can be readily established, the precise best values depend on model characteristics that are typically unknown in advance. We… ▽ More Biased stochastic estimators, such as finite-differences for noisy gradient estimation, often contain parameters that need to be properly chosen to balance impacts from the bias and the variance. While the optimal order of these parameters in terms of the simulation budget can be readily established, the precise best values depend on model characteristics that are typically unknown in advance. We introduce a framework to construct new classes of estimators, based on judicious combinations of simulation runs on sequences of tuning parameter values, such that the estimators consistently outperform a given tuning parameter choice in the conventional approach, regardless of the unknown model characteristics. We argue the outperformance via what we call the asymptotic minimax risk ratio, obtained by minimizing the worst-case asymptotic ratio between the mean square errors of our estimators and the conventional one, where the worst case is over any possible values of the model unknowns. In particular, when the minimax ratio is less than 1, the calibrated estimator is guaranteed to perform better asymptotically. We identify this minimax ratio for general classes of weighted estimators, and the regimes where this ratio is less than 1. Moreover, we show that the best weighting scheme is characterized by a sum of two components with distinct decay rates. We explain how this arises from bias-variance balancing that combats the adversarial selection of the model constants, which can be analyzed via a tractable reformulation of a non-convex optimization problem. △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Subsampling to Enhance Efficiency in Input Uncertainty Quantification

Authors: Henry Lam, Huajie Qian

Abstract: In stochastic simulation, input uncertainty refers to the output variability arising from the statistical noise in specifying the input models. This uncertainty can be measured by a variance contribution in the output, which, in the nonparametric setting, is commonly estimated via the bootstrap. However, due to the convolution of the simulation noise and the input noise, the bootstrap consists of… ▽ More In stochastic simulation, input uncertainty refers to the output variability arising from the statistical noise in specifying the input models. This uncertainty can be measured by a variance contribution in the output, which, in the nonparametric setting, is commonly estimated via the bootstrap. However, due to the convolution of the simulation noise and the input noise, the bootstrap consists of a two-layer sampling and typically requires substantial simulation effort. This paper investigates a subsampling framework to reduce the required effort, by leveraging the form of the variance and its estimation error in terms of the data size and the sampling requirement in each layer. We show how the total required effort can be reduced from an order bigger than the data size in the conventional approach to an order independent of the data size in subsampling. We explicitly identify the procedural specifications in our framework that guarantee relative consistency in the estimation, and the corresponding optimal simulation budget allocations. We substantiate our theoretical results with numerical examples. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2021; v1 submitted 11 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Synthesis of Different Autonomous Vehicles Test Approaches

Authors: Zhiyuan Huang, Mansur Arief, Henry Lam, Ding Zhao

Abstract: Currently, the most prevalent way to evaluate an autonomous vehicle is to directly test it on the public road. However, because of recent accidents caused by autonomous vehicles, it becomes controversial about whether on-road tests should be the best approach. Alternatively, people use test tracks or simulation to assess the safety of autonomous vehicles. These approaches are time-efficient and le… ▽ More Currently, the most prevalent way to evaluate an autonomous vehicle is to directly test it on the public road. However, because of recent accidents caused by autonomous vehicles, it becomes controversial about whether on-road tests should be the best approach. Alternatively, people use test tracks or simulation to assess the safety of autonomous vehicles. These approaches are time-efficient and less costly, however, their credibility varies. In this paper, we propose to use a co-Kriging model to synthesize the results from different evaluation approaches, which allows us to fully utilize the information and provides an accurate, affordable, and safe way to assess a design of an autonomous vehicle. △ Less

Submitted 8 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.