-
Scalable Analysis of Bipartite Experiments
Authors:
Liang Shi,
Edvard Bakhitov,
Kenneth Hung,
Brian Karrer,
Charlie Walker,
Monica Bhole,
Okke Schrijvers
Abstract:
Bipartite Experiments are randomized experiments where the treatment is applied to a set of units (randomization units) that is different from the units of analysis, and randomization units and analysis units are connected through a bipartite graph. The scale of experimentation at large online platforms necessitates both accurate inference in the presence of a large bipartite interference graph, a…
▽ More
Bipartite Experiments are randomized experiments where the treatment is applied to a set of units (randomization units) that is different from the units of analysis, and randomization units and analysis units are connected through a bipartite graph. The scale of experimentation at large online platforms necessitates both accurate inference in the presence of a large bipartite interference graph, as well as a highly scalable implementation. In this paper, we describe new methods for inference that enable practical, scalable analysis of bipartite experiments: (1) We propose CA-ERL, a covariate-adjusted variant of the exposure-reweighted-linear (ERL) estimator [9], which empirically yields 60-90% variance reduction. (2) We introduce a randomization-based method for inference and prove asymptotic validity of a Wald-type confidence interval under graph sparsity assumptions. (3) We present a linear-time algorithm for randomization inference of the CA-ERL estimator, which can be easily implemented in query engines like Presto or Spark. We evaluate our methods both on a real experiment at Meta that randomized treatment on Facebook Groups and analyzed user-level metrics, as well as simulations on synthetic data. The real-world data shows that our CA-ERL estimator reduces the confidence interval (CI) width by 60-90% (compared to ERL) in a practical setting. The simulations using synthetic data show that our randomization inference procedure achieves correct coverage across instances, while the ERL estimator has incorrectly small CI widths for instances with large true effect sizes and is overly conservative when the bipartite graph is dense.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Causal clustering: design of cluster experiments under network interference
Authors:
Davide Viviano,
Lihua Lei,
Guido Imbens,
Brian Karrer,
Okke Schrijvers,
Liang Shi
Abstract:
This paper studies the design of cluster experiments to estimate the global treatment effect in the presence of network spillovers. We provide a framework to choose the clustering that minimizes the worst-case mean-squared error of the estimated global effect. We show that optimal clustering solves a novel penalized min-cut optimization problem computed via off-the-shelf semi-definite programming…
▽ More
This paper studies the design of cluster experiments to estimate the global treatment effect in the presence of network spillovers. We provide a framework to choose the clustering that minimizes the worst-case mean-squared error of the estimated global effect. We show that optimal clustering solves a novel penalized min-cut optimization problem computed via off-the-shelf semi-definite programming algorithms. Our analysis also characterizes simple conditions to choose between any two cluster designs, including choosing between a cluster or individual-level randomization. We illustrate the method's properties using unique network data from the universe of Facebook's users and existing data from a field experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2024; v1 submitted 23 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Generalized Schrödinger Bridge Matching
Authors:
Guan-Horng Liu,
Yaron Lipman,
Maximilian Nickel,
Brian Karrer,
Evangelos A. Theodorou,
Ricky T. Q. Chen
Abstract:
Modern distribution matching algorithms for training diffusion or flow models directly prescribe the time evolution of the marginal distributions between two boundary distributions. In this work, we consider a generalized distribution matching setup, where these marginals are only implicitly described as a solution to some task-specific objective function. The problem setup, known as the Generaliz…
▽ More
Modern distribution matching algorithms for training diffusion or flow models directly prescribe the time evolution of the marginal distributions between two boundary distributions. In this work, we consider a generalized distribution matching setup, where these marginals are only implicitly described as a solution to some task-specific objective function. The problem setup, known as the Generalized Schrödinger Bridge (GSB), appears prevalently in many scientific areas both within and without machine learning. We propose Generalized Schrödinger Bridge Matching (GSBM), a new matching algorithm inspired by recent advances, generalizing them beyond kinetic energy minimization and to account for task-specific state costs. We show that such a generalization can be cast as solving conditional stochastic optimal control, for which efficient variational approximations can be used, and further debiased with the aid of path integral theory. Compared to prior methods for solving GSB problems, our GSBM algorithm better preserves a feasible transport map between the boundary distributions throughout training, thereby enabling stable convergence and significantly improved scalability. We empirically validate our claims on an extensive suite of experimental setups, including crowd navigation, opinion depolarization, LiDAR manifolds, and image domain transfer. Our work brings new algorithmic opportunities for training diffusion models enhanced with task-specific optimality structures. Code available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/generalized-schrodinger-bridge-matching
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2024; v1 submitted 3 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Network experimentation at scale
Authors:
Brian Karrer,
Liang Shi,
Monica Bhole,
Matt Goldman,
Tyrone Palmer,
Charlie Gelman,
Mikael Konutgan,
Feng Sun
Abstract:
We describe our framework, deployed at Facebook, that accounts for interference between experimental units through cluster-randomized experiments. We document this system, including the design and estimation procedures, and detail insights we have gained from the many experiments that have used this system at scale. We introduce a cluster-based regression adjustment that substantially improves pre…
▽ More
We describe our framework, deployed at Facebook, that accounts for interference between experimental units through cluster-randomized experiments. We document this system, including the design and estimation procedures, and detail insights we have gained from the many experiments that have used this system at scale. We introduce a cluster-based regression adjustment that substantially improves precision for estimating global treatment effects as well as testing for interference as part of our estimation procedure. With this regression adjustment, we find that imbalanced clusters can better account for interference than balanced clusters without sacrificing accuracy. In addition, we show how logging exposure to a treatment can be used for additional variance reduction. Interference is a widely acknowledged issue with online field experiments, yet there is less evidence from real-world experiments demonstrating interference in online settings. We fill this gap by describing two case studies that capture significant network effects and highlight the value of this experimentation framework.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Efficient Nonmyopic Bayesian Optimization via One-Shot Multi-Step Trees
Authors:
Shali Jiang,
Daniel R. Jiang,
Maximilian Balandat,
Brian Karrer,
Jacob R. Gardner,
Roman Garnett
Abstract:
Bayesian optimization is a sequential decision making framework for optimizing expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions. Computing a full lookahead policy amounts to solving a highly intractable stochastic dynamic program. Myopic approaches, such as expected improvement, are often adopted in practice, but they ignore the long-term impact of the immediate decision. Existing nonmyopic approaches ar…
▽ More
Bayesian optimization is a sequential decision making framework for optimizing expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions. Computing a full lookahead policy amounts to solving a highly intractable stochastic dynamic program. Myopic approaches, such as expected improvement, are often adopted in practice, but they ignore the long-term impact of the immediate decision. Existing nonmyopic approaches are mostly heuristic and/or computationally expensive. In this paper, we provide the first efficient implementation of general multi-step lookahead Bayesian optimization, formulated as a sequence of nested optimization problems within a multi-step scenario tree. Instead of solving these problems in a nested way, we equivalently optimize all decision variables in the full tree jointly, in a ``one-shot'' fashion. Combining this with an efficient method for implementing multi-step Gaussian process ``fantasization,'' we demonstrate that multi-step expected improvement is computationally tractable and exhibits performance superior to existing methods on a wide range of benchmarks.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian Optimization
Authors:
Maximilian Balandat,
Brian Karrer,
Daniel R. Jiang,
Samuel Daulton,
Benjamin Letham,
Andrew Gordon Wilson,
Eytan Bakshy
Abstract:
Bayesian optimization provides sample-efficient global optimization for a broad range of applications, including automatic machine learning, engineering, physics, and experimental design. We introduce BoTorch, a modern programming framework for Bayesian optimization that combines Monte-Carlo (MC) acquisition functions, a novel sample average approximation optimization approach, auto-differentiatio…
▽ More
Bayesian optimization provides sample-efficient global optimization for a broad range of applications, including automatic machine learning, engineering, physics, and experimental design. We introduce BoTorch, a modern programming framework for Bayesian optimization that combines Monte-Carlo (MC) acquisition functions, a novel sample average approximation optimization approach, auto-differentiation, and variance reduction techniques. BoTorch's modular design facilitates flexible specification and optimization of probabilistic models written in PyTorch, simplifying implementation of new acquisition functions. Our approach is backed by novel theoretical convergence results and made practical by a distinctive algorithmic foundation that leverages fast predictive distributions, hardware acceleration, and deterministic optimization. We also propose a novel "one-shot" formulation of the Knowledge Gradient, enabled by a combination of our theoretical and software contributions. In experiments, we demonstrate the improved sample efficiency of BoTorch relative to other popular libraries.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2020; v1 submitted 14 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
The decoupled extended Kalman filter for dynamic exponential-family factorization models
Authors:
Carlos Alberto Gomez-Uribe,
Brian Karrer
Abstract:
Motivated by the needs of online large-scale recommender systems, we specialize the decoupled extended Kalman filter (DEKF) to factorization models, including factorization machines, matrix and tensor factorization, and illustrate the effectiveness of the approach through numerical experiments on synthetic and on real-world data. Online learning of model parameters through the DEKF makes factoriza…
▽ More
Motivated by the needs of online large-scale recommender systems, we specialize the decoupled extended Kalman filter (DEKF) to factorization models, including factorization machines, matrix and tensor factorization, and illustrate the effectiveness of the approach through numerical experiments on synthetic and on real-world data. Online learning of model parameters through the DEKF makes factorization models more broadly useful by (i) allowing for more flexible observations through the entire exponential family, (ii) modeling parameter drift, and (iii) producing parameter uncertainty estimates that can enable explore/exploit and other applications. We use a different parameter dynamics than the standard DEKF, allowing parameter drift while encouraging reasonable values. We also present an alternate derivation of the extended Kalman filter and DEKF that highlights the role of the Fisher information matrix in the EKF.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2021; v1 submitted 26 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Constrained Bayesian Optimization with Noisy Experiments
Authors:
Benjamin Letham,
Brian Karrer,
Guilherme Ottoni,
Eytan Bakshy
Abstract:
Randomized experiments are the gold standard for evaluating the effects of changes to real-world systems. Data in these tests may be difficult to collect and outcomes may have high variance, resulting in potentially large measurement error. Bayesian optimization is a promising technique for efficiently optimizing multiple continuous parameters, but existing approaches degrade in performance when t…
▽ More
Randomized experiments are the gold standard for evaluating the effects of changes to real-world systems. Data in these tests may be difficult to collect and outcomes may have high variance, resulting in potentially large measurement error. Bayesian optimization is a promising technique for efficiently optimizing multiple continuous parameters, but existing approaches degrade in performance when the noise level is high, limiting its applicability to many randomized experiments. We derive an expression for expected improvement under greedy batch optimization with noisy observations and noisy constraints, and develop a quasi-Monte Carlo approximation that allows it to be efficiently optimized. Simulations with synthetic functions show that optimization performance on noisy, constrained problems outperforms existing methods. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of the method with two real-world experiments conducted at Facebook: optimizing a ranking system, and optimizing server compiler flags.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2018; v1 submitted 21 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
Design and analysis of experiments in networks: Reducing bias from interference
Authors:
Dean Eckles,
Brian Karrer,
Johan Ugander
Abstract:
Estimating the effects of interventions in networks is complicated when the units are interacting, such that the outcomes for one unit may depend on the treatment assignment and behavior of many or all other units (i.e., there is interference). When most or all units are in a single connected component, it is impossible to directly experimentally compare outcomes under two or more global treatment…
▽ More
Estimating the effects of interventions in networks is complicated when the units are interacting, such that the outcomes for one unit may depend on the treatment assignment and behavior of many or all other units (i.e., there is interference). When most or all units are in a single connected component, it is impossible to directly experimentally compare outcomes under two or more global treatment assignments since the network can only be observed under a single assignment. Familiar formalism, experimental designs, and analysis methods assume the absence of these interactions, and result in biased estimators of causal effects of interest. While some assumptions can lead to unbiased estimators, these assumptions are generally unrealistic, and we focus this work on realistic assumptions. Thus, in this work, we evaluate methods for designing and analyzing randomized experiments that aim to reduce this bias and thereby reduce overall error. In design, we consider the ability to perform random assignment to treatments that is correlated in the network, such as through graph cluster randomization. In analysis, we consider incorporating information about the treatment assignment of network neighbors. We prove sufficient conditions for bias reduction through both design and analysis in the presence of potentially global interference. Through simulations of the entire process of experimentation in networks, we measure the performance of these methods under varied network structure and varied social behaviors, finding substantial bias and error reductions. These improvements are largest for networks with more clustering and data generating processes with both stronger direct effects of the treatment and stronger interactions between units.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2014; v1 submitted 29 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
-
Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universes
Authors:
Johan Ugander,
Brian Karrer,
Lars Backstrom,
Jon Kleinberg
Abstract:
A/B testing is a standard approach for evaluating the effect of online experiments; the goal is to estimate the `average treatment effect' of a new feature or condition by exposing a sample of the overall population to it. A drawback with A/B testing is that it is poorly suited for experiments involving social interference, when the treatment of individuals spills over to neighboring individuals a…
▽ More
A/B testing is a standard approach for evaluating the effect of online experiments; the goal is to estimate the `average treatment effect' of a new feature or condition by exposing a sample of the overall population to it. A drawback with A/B testing is that it is poorly suited for experiments involving social interference, when the treatment of individuals spills over to neighboring individuals along an underlying social network. In this work, we propose a novel methodology using graph clustering to analyze average treatment effects under social interference. To begin, we characterize graph-theoretic conditions under which individuals can be considered to be `network exposed' to an experiment. We then show how graph cluster randomization admits an efficient exact algorithm to compute the probabilities for each vertex being network exposed under several of these exposure conditions. Using these probabilities as inverse weights, a Horvitz-Thompson estimator can then provide an effect estimate that is unbiased, provided that the exposure model has been properly specified.
Given an estimator that is unbiased, we focus on minimizing the variance. First, we develop simple sufficient conditions for the variance of the estimator to be asymptotically small in n, the size of the graph. However, for general randomization schemes, this variance can be lower bounded by an exponential function of the degrees of a graph. In contrast, we show that if a graph satisfies a restricted-growth condition on the growth rate of neighborhoods, then there exists a natural clustering algorithm, based on vertex neighborhoods, for which the variance of the estimator can be upper bounded by a linear function of the degrees. Thus we show that proper cluster randomization can lead to exponentially lower estimator variance when experimentally measuring average treatment effects under interference.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
