-
Implementing Bayesian inference on a stochastic CO2-based grey-box model for assessing indoor air quality in Canadian primary schools
Authors:
Shujie Yan,
Jiwei Zou,
Chang Shu,
Justin Berquist,
Vincent Brochu,
Marc Veillette,
Danlin Hou,
Caroline Duchaine,
Liang,
Zhou,
Zhiqiang,
Zhai,
Liangzhu,
Wang
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic brought global attention to indoor air quality (IAQ), which is intrinsically linked to clean air change rates. Estimating the air change rate in indoor environments, however, remains challenging. It is primarily due to the uncertainties associated with the air change rate estimation, such as pollutant generation rates, dynamics including weather and occupancies, and the limit…
▽ More
The COVID-19 pandemic brought global attention to indoor air quality (IAQ), which is intrinsically linked to clean air change rates. Estimating the air change rate in indoor environments, however, remains challenging. It is primarily due to the uncertainties associated with the air change rate estimation, such as pollutant generation rates, dynamics including weather and occupancies, and the limitations of deterministic approaches to accommodate these factors. In this study, Bayesian inference was implemented on a stochastic CO2-based grey-box model to infer modeled parameters and quantify uncertainties. The accuracy and robustness of the ventilation rate and CO2 emission rate estimated by the model were confirmed with CO2 tracer gas experiments conducted in an airtight chamber. Both prior and posterior predictive checks (PPC) were performed to demonstrate the advantage of this approach. In addition, uncertainties in real-life contexts were quantified with an incremental variance σ for the Wiener process. This approach was later applied to evaluate the ventilation conditions within two primary school classrooms in Montreal. The Equivalent Clean Airflow Rate (ECAi) was calculated following ASHRAE 241, and an insufficient clean air supply within both classrooms was identified. A supplement of 800 cfm clear air delivery rate (CADR) from air-cleaning devices is recommended for a sufficient ECAi. Finally, steady-state CO2 thresholds (Climit, Ctarget, and Cideal) were carried out to indicate when ECAi requirements could be achieved under various mitigation strategies, such as portable air cleaners and in-room ultraviolet light, with CADR values ranging from 200 to 1000 cfm.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2024; v1 submitted 1 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Statistical Methods for Assessing Differences in False Non-Match Rates Across Demographic Groups
Authors:
Michael Schuckers,
Sandip Purnapatra,
Kaniz Fatima,
Daqing Hou,
Stephanie Schuckers
Abstract:
Biometric recognition is used across a variety of applications from cyber security to border security. Recent research has focused on ensuring biometric performance (false negatives and false positives) is fair across demographic groups. While there has been significant progress on the development of metrics, the evaluation of the performance across groups, and the mitigation of any problems, ther…
▽ More
Biometric recognition is used across a variety of applications from cyber security to border security. Recent research has focused on ensuring biometric performance (false negatives and false positives) is fair across demographic groups. While there has been significant progress on the development of metrics, the evaluation of the performance across groups, and the mitigation of any problems, there has been little work incorporating statistical variation. This is important because differences among groups can be found by chance when no difference is present. In statistics this is called a Type I error. Differences among groups may be due to sampling variation or they may be due to actual difference in system performance. Discriminating between these two sources of error is essential for good decision making about fairness and equity. This paper presents two novel statistical approaches for assessing fairness across demographic groups. The first methodology is a bootstrapped-based hypothesis test, while the second is simpler test methodology focused upon non-statistical audience. For the latter we present the results of a simulation study about the relationship between the margin of error and factors such as number of subjects, number of attempts, correlation between attempts, underlying false non-match rates(FNMR's), and number of groups.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Machine Learning at the Network Edge: A Survey
Authors:
M. G. Sarwar Murshed,
Christopher Murphy,
Daqing Hou,
Nazar Khan,
Ganesh Ananthanarayanan,
Faraz Hussain
Abstract:
Resource-constrained IoT devices, such as sensors and actuators, have become ubiquitous in recent years. This has led to the generation of large quantities of data in real-time, which is an appealing target for AI systems. However, deploying machine learning models on such end-devices is nearly impossible. A typical solution involves offloading data to external computing systems (such as cloud ser…
▽ More
Resource-constrained IoT devices, such as sensors and actuators, have become ubiquitous in recent years. This has led to the generation of large quantities of data in real-time, which is an appealing target for AI systems. However, deploying machine learning models on such end-devices is nearly impossible. A typical solution involves offloading data to external computing systems (such as cloud servers) for further processing but this worsens latency, leads to increased communication costs, and adds to privacy concerns. To address this issue, efforts have been made to place additional computing devices at the edge of the network, i.e close to the IoT devices where the data is generated. Deploying machine learning systems on such edge computing devices alleviates the above issues by allowing computations to be performed close to the data sources. This survey describes major research efforts where machine learning systems have been deployed at the edge of computer networks, focusing on the operational aspects including compression techniques, tools, frameworks, and hardware used in successful applications of intelligent edge systems.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2021; v1 submitted 31 July, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Detection based Defense against Adversarial Examples from the Steganalysis Point of View
Authors:
Jiayang Liu,
Weiming Zhang,
Yiwei Zhang,
Dongdong Hou,
Yujia Liu,
Hongyue Zha,
Nenghai Yu
Abstract:
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have recently led to significant improvements in many fields. However, DNNs are vulnerable to adversarial examples which are samples with imperceptible perturbations while dramatically misleading the DNNs. Moreover, adversarial examples can be used to perform an attack on various kinds of DNN based systems, even if the adversary has no access to the underlying model. Ma…
▽ More
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have recently led to significant improvements in many fields. However, DNNs are vulnerable to adversarial examples which are samples with imperceptible perturbations while dramatically misleading the DNNs. Moreover, adversarial examples can be used to perform an attack on various kinds of DNN based systems, even if the adversary has no access to the underlying model. Many defense methods have been proposed, such as obfuscating gradients of the networks or detecting adversarial examples. However it is proved out that these defense methods are not effective or cannot resist secondary adversarial attacks. In this paper, we point out that steganalysis can be applied to adversarial examples detection, and propose a method to enhance steganalysis features by estimating the probability of modifications caused by adversarial attacks. Experimental results show that the proposed method can accurately detect adversarial examples. Moreover, secondary adversarial attacks cannot be directly performed to our method because our method is not based on a neural network but based on high-dimensional artificial features and FLD (Fisher Linear Discriminant) ensemble.
△ Less
Submitted 24 December, 2018; v1 submitted 21 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
