-
Comparative evaluation of earthquake forecasting models: An application to Italy
Authors:
Jonas R. Brehmer,
Kristof Kraus,
Tilmann Gneiting,
Marcus Herrmann,
Warner Marzocchi
Abstract:
Testing earthquake forecasts is essential to obtain scientific information on forecasting models and sufficient credibility for societal usage. We aim at enhancing the testing phase proposed by the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP, Schorlemmer et al., 2018) with new statistical methods supported by mathematical theory. To demonstrate their applicability, we evaluate t…
▽ More
Testing earthquake forecasts is essential to obtain scientific information on forecasting models and sufficient credibility for societal usage. We aim at enhancing the testing phase proposed by the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP, Schorlemmer et al., 2018) with new statistical methods supported by mathematical theory. To demonstrate their applicability, we evaluate three short-term forecasting models that were submitted to the CSEP Italy experiment, and two ensemble models thereof. The models produce weekly overlap** forecasts for the expected number of M4+ earthquakes in a collection of grid cells. We compare the models' forecasts using consistent scoring functions for means or expectations, which are widely used and theoretically principled tools for forecast evaluation. We further discuss and demonstrate their connection to CSEP-style earthquake likelihood model testing. Then, using tools from isotonic regression, we investigate forecast reliability and apply score decompositions in terms of calibration and discrimination. Our results show where and how models outperform their competitors and reveal a substantial lack of calibration for various models. The proposed methods also apply to full-distribution (e.g., catalog-based) forecasts, without requiring Poisson distributions or making any other type of parametric assumption.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Position: Why We Must Rethink Empirical Research in Machine Learning
Authors:
Moritz Herrmann,
F. Julian D. Lange,
Katharina Eggensperger,
Giuseppe Casalicchio,
Marcel Wever,
Matthias Feurer,
David Rügamer,
Eyke Hüllermeier,
Anne-Laure Boulesteix,
Bernd Bischl
Abstract:
We warn against a common but incomplete understanding of empirical research in machine learning that leads to non-replicable results, makes findings unreliable, and threatens to undermine progress in the field. To overcome this alarming situation, we call for more awareness of the plurality of ways of gaining knowledge experimentally but also of some epistemic limitations. In particular, we argue…
▽ More
We warn against a common but incomplete understanding of empirical research in machine learning that leads to non-replicable results, makes findings unreliable, and threatens to undermine progress in the field. To overcome this alarming situation, we call for more awareness of the plurality of ways of gaining knowledge experimentally but also of some epistemic limitations. In particular, we argue most current empirical machine learning research is fashioned as confirmatory research while it should rather be considered exploratory.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2024; v1 submitted 3 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
To tweak or not to tweak. How exploiting flexibilities in gene set analysis leads to over-optimism
Authors:
Milena Wünsch,
Christina Sauer,
Moritz Herrmann,
Ludwig Christian Hinske,
Anne-Laure Boulesteix
Abstract:
Gene set analysis, a popular approach for analysing high-throughput gene expression data, aims to identify sets of genes that show enriched expression patterns between two conditions. In addition to the multitude of methods available for this task, users are typically left with many options when creating the required input and specifying the internal parameters of the chosen method. This flexibili…
▽ More
Gene set analysis, a popular approach for analysing high-throughput gene expression data, aims to identify sets of genes that show enriched expression patterns between two conditions. In addition to the multitude of methods available for this task, users are typically left with many options when creating the required input and specifying the internal parameters of the chosen method. This flexibility can lead to uncertainty about the 'right' choice, further reinforced by a lack of evidence-based guidance. Especially when their statistical experience is scarce, this uncertainty might entice users to produce preferable results using a 'trial-and-error' approach. While it may seem unproblematic at first glance, this practice can be viewed as a form of 'cherry-picking' and cause an optimistic bias, rendering the results non-replicable on independent data. After this problem has attracted a lot of attention in the context of classical hypothesis testing, we now aim to raise awareness of such over-optimism in the different and more complex context of gene set analyses. We mimic a hypothetical researcher who systematically selects the analysis variants yielding their preferred results, thereby considering three distinct goals they might pursue. Using a selection of popular gene set analysis methods, we tweak the results in this way for two frequently used benchmark gene expression data sets. Our study indicates that the potential for over-optimism is particularly high for a group of methods frequently used despite being commonly criticised. We conclude by providing practical recommendations to counter over-optimism in research findings in gene set analysis and beyond.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
DCSI -- An improved measure of cluster separability based on separation and connectedness
Authors:
Jana Gauss,
Fabian Scheipl,
Moritz Herrmann
Abstract:
Whether class labels in a given data set correspond to meaningful clusters is crucial for the evaluation of clustering algorithms using real-world data sets. This property can be quantified by separability measures. The central aspects of separability for density-based clustering are between-class separation and within-class connectedness, and neither classification-based complexity measures nor c…
▽ More
Whether class labels in a given data set correspond to meaningful clusters is crucial for the evaluation of clustering algorithms using real-world data sets. This property can be quantified by separability measures. The central aspects of separability for density-based clustering are between-class separation and within-class connectedness, and neither classification-based complexity measures nor cluster validity indices (CVIs) adequately incorporate them. A newly developed measure (density cluster separability index, DCSI) aims to quantify these two characteristics and can also be used as a CVI. Extensive experiments on synthetic data indicate that DCSI correlates strongly with the performance of DBSCAN measured via the adjusted Rand index (ARI) but lacks robustness when it comes to multi-class data sets with overlap** classes that are ill-suited for density-based hard clustering. Detailed evaluation on frequently used real-world data sets shows that DCSI can correctly identify touching or overlap** classes that do not correspond to meaningful density-based clusters.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2024; v1 submitted 19 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
An Approach to Multiple Comparison Benchmark Evaluations that is Stable Under Manipulation of the Comparate Set
Authors:
Ali Ismail-Fawaz,
Angus Dempster,
Chang Wei Tan,
Matthieu Herrmann,
Lynn Miller,
Daniel F. Schmidt,
Stefano Berretti,
Jonathan Weber,
Maxime Devanne,
Germain Forestier,
Geoffrey I. Webb
Abstract:
The measurement of progress using benchmarks evaluations is ubiquitous in computer science and machine learning. However, common approaches to analyzing and presenting the results of benchmark comparisons of multiple algorithms over multiple datasets, such as the critical difference diagram introduced by Demšar (2006), have important shortcomings and, we show, are open to both inadvertent and inte…
▽ More
The measurement of progress using benchmarks evaluations is ubiquitous in computer science and machine learning. However, common approaches to analyzing and presenting the results of benchmark comparisons of multiple algorithms over multiple datasets, such as the critical difference diagram introduced by Demšar (2006), have important shortcomings and, we show, are open to both inadvertent and intentional manipulation. To address these issues, we propose a new approach to presenting the results of benchmark comparisons, the Multiple Comparison Matrix (MCM), that prioritizes pairwise comparisons and precludes the means of manipulating experimental results in existing approaches. MCM can be used to show the results of an all-pairs comparison, or to show the results of a comparison between one or more selected algorithms and the state of the art. MCM is implemented in Python and is publicly available.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
A geometric framework for outlier detection in high-dimensional data
Authors:
Moritz Herrmann,
Florian Pfisterer,
Fabian Scheipl
Abstract:
Outlier or anomaly detection is an important task in data analysis. We discuss the problem from a geometrical perspective and provide a framework that exploits the metric structure of a data set. Our approach rests on the manifold assumption, i.e., that the observed, nominally high-dimensional data lie on a much lower dimensional manifold and that this intrinsic structure can be inferred with mani…
▽ More
Outlier or anomaly detection is an important task in data analysis. We discuss the problem from a geometrical perspective and provide a framework that exploits the metric structure of a data set. Our approach rests on the manifold assumption, i.e., that the observed, nominally high-dimensional data lie on a much lower dimensional manifold and that this intrinsic structure can be inferred with manifold learning methods. We show that exploiting this structure significantly improves the detection of outlying observations in high-dimensional data. We also suggest a novel, mathematically precise, and widely applicable distinction between distributional and structural outliers based on the geometry and topology of the data manifold that clarifies conceptual ambiguities prevalent throughout the literature. Our experiments focus on functional data as one class of structured high-dimensional data, but the framework we propose is completely general and we include image and graph data applications. Our results show that the outlier structure of high-dimensional and non-tabular data can be detected and visualized using manifold learning methods and quantified using standard outlier scoring methods applied to the manifold embedding vectors.
△ Less
Submitted 29 July, 2022; v1 submitted 1 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Self-Assessment for Single-Object Tracking in Clutter Using Subjective Logic
Authors:
Thomas Griebel,
Johannes Müller,
Paul Geisler,
Charlotte Hermann,
Martin Herrmann,
Michael Buchholz,
Klaus Dietmayer
Abstract:
Reliable tracking algorithms are essential for automated driving. However, the existing consistency measures are not sufficient to meet the increasing safety demands in the automotive sector. Therefore, this work presents a novel method for self-assessment of single-object tracking in clutter based on Kalman filtering and subjective logic. A key feature of the approach is that it additionally prov…
▽ More
Reliable tracking algorithms are essential for automated driving. However, the existing consistency measures are not sufficient to meet the increasing safety demands in the automotive sector. Therefore, this work presents a novel method for self-assessment of single-object tracking in clutter based on Kalman filtering and subjective logic. A key feature of the approach is that it additionally provides a measure of the collected statistical evidence in its online reliability scores. In this way, various aspects of reliability, such as the correctness of the assumed measurement noise, detection probability, and clutter rate, can be monitored in addition to the overall assessment based on the available evidence. Here, we present a mathematical derivation of the reference distribution used in our self-assessment module for our studied problem. Moreover, we introduce a formula that describes how a threshold should be chosen for the degree of conflict, the subjective logic comparison measure used for the reliability decision making. Our approach is evaluated in a challenging simulation scenario designed to model adverse weather conditions. The simulations show that our method can significantly improve the reliability checking of single-object tracking in clutter in several aspects.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Efficient Random Walks on Riemannian Manifolds
Authors:
Simon Schwarz,
Michael Herrmann,
Anja Sturm,
Max Wardetzky
Abstract:
According to a version of Donsker's theorem, geodesic random walks on Riemannian manifolds converge to the respective Brownian motion. From a computational perspective, however, evaluating geodesics can be quite costly. We therefore introduce approximate geodesic random walks based on the concept of retractions. We show that these approximate walks converge in distribution to the correct Brownian…
▽ More
According to a version of Donsker's theorem, geodesic random walks on Riemannian manifolds converge to the respective Brownian motion. From a computational perspective, however, evaluating geodesics can be quite costly. We therefore introduce approximate geodesic random walks based on the concept of retractions. We show that these approximate walks converge in distribution to the correct Brownian motion as long as the geodesic equation is approximated up to second order. As a result we obtain an efficient algorithm for sampling Brownian motion on compact Riemannian manifolds.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2023; v1 submitted 2 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
A geometric perspective on functional outlier detection
Authors:
Moritz Herrmann,
Fabian Scheipl
Abstract:
We consider functional outlier detection from a geometric perspective, specifically: for functional data sets drawn from a functional manifold which is defined by the data's modes of variation in amplitude and phase. Based on this manifold, we develop a conceptualization of functional outlier detection that is more widely applicable and realistic than previously proposed. Our theoretical and exper…
▽ More
We consider functional outlier detection from a geometric perspective, specifically: for functional data sets drawn from a functional manifold which is defined by the data's modes of variation in amplitude and phase. Based on this manifold, we develop a conceptualization of functional outlier detection that is more widely applicable and realistic than previously proposed. Our theoretical and experimental analyses demonstrate several important advantages of this perspective: It considerably improves theoretical understanding and allows to describe and analyse complex functional outlier scenarios consistently and in full generality, by differentiating between structurally anomalous outlier data that are off-manifold and distributionally outlying data that are on-manifold but at its margins. This improves practical feasibility of functional outlier detection: We show that simple manifold learning methods can be used to reliably infer and visualize the geometric structure of functional data sets. We also show that standard outlier detection methods requiring tabular data inputs can be applied to functional data very successfully by simply using their vector-valued representations learned from manifold learning methods as input features. Our experiments on synthetic and real data sets demonstrate that this approach leads to outlier detection performances at least on par with existing functional data-specific methods in a large variety of settings, without the highly specialized, complex methodology and narrow domain of application these methods often entail.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Over-optimism in benchmark studies and the multiplicity of design and analysis options when interpreting their results
Authors:
Christina Nießl,
Moritz Herrmann,
Chiara Wiedemann,
Giuseppe Casalicchio,
Anne-Laure Boulesteix
Abstract:
In recent years, the need for neutral benchmark studies that focus on the comparison of methods from computational sciences has been increasingly recognised by the scientific community. While general advice on the design and analysis of neutral benchmark studies can be found in recent literature, certain amounts of flexibility always exist. This includes the choice of data sets and performance mea…
▽ More
In recent years, the need for neutral benchmark studies that focus on the comparison of methods from computational sciences has been increasingly recognised by the scientific community. While general advice on the design and analysis of neutral benchmark studies can be found in recent literature, certain amounts of flexibility always exist. This includes the choice of data sets and performance measures, the handling of missing performance values and the way the performance values are aggregated over the data sets. As a consequence of this flexibility, researchers may be concerned about how their choices affect the results or, in the worst case, may be tempted to engage in questionable research practices (e.g. the selective reporting of results or the post-hoc modification of design or analysis components) to fit their expectations or hopes. To raise awareness for this issue, we use an example benchmark study to illustrate how variable benchmark results can be when all possible combinations of a range of design and analysis options are considered. We then demonstrate how the impact of each choice on the results can be assessed using multidimensional unfolding. In conclusion, based on previous literature and on our illustrative example, we claim that the multiplicity of design and analysis options combined with questionable research practices lead to biased interpretations of benchmark results and to over-optimistic conclusions. This issue should be considered by computational researchers when designing and analysing their benchmark studies and by the scientific community in general in an effort towards more reliable benchmark results.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Unsupervised Functional Data Analysis via Nonlinear Dimension Reduction
Authors:
Moritz Herrmann,
Fabian Scheipl
Abstract:
In recent years, manifold methods have moved into focus as tools for dimension reduction. Assuming that the high-dimensional data actually lie on or close to a low-dimensional nonlinear manifold, these methods have shown convincing results in several settings. This manifold assumption is often reasonable for functional data, i.e., data representing continuously observed functions, as well. However…
▽ More
In recent years, manifold methods have moved into focus as tools for dimension reduction. Assuming that the high-dimensional data actually lie on or close to a low-dimensional nonlinear manifold, these methods have shown convincing results in several settings. This manifold assumption is often reasonable for functional data, i.e., data representing continuously observed functions, as well. However, the performance of manifold methods recently proposed for tabular or image data has not been systematically assessed in the case of functional data yet. Moreover, it is unclear how to evaluate the quality of learned embeddings that do not yield invertible map**s, since the reconstruction error cannot be used as a performance measure for such representations. In this work, we describe and investigate the specific challenges for nonlinear dimension reduction posed by the functional data setting. The contributions of the paper are three-fold: First of all, we define a theoretical framework which allows to systematically assess specific challenges that arise in the functional data context, transfer several nonlinear dimension reduction methods for tabular and image data to functional data, and show that manifold methods can be used successfully in this setting. Secondly, we subject performance assessment and tuning strategies to a thorough and systematic evaluation based on several different functional data settings and point out some previously undescribed weaknesses and pitfalls which can jeopardize reliable judgment of embedding quality. Thirdly, we propose a nuanced approach to make trustworthy decisions for or against competing nonconforming embeddings more objectively.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Large-scale benchmark study of survival prediction methods using multi-omics data
Authors:
Moritz Herrmann,
Philipp Probst,
Roman Hornung,
Vindi Jurinovic,
Anne-Laure Boulesteix
Abstract:
Multi-omics data, that is, datasets containing different types of high-dimensional molecular variables (often in addition to classical clinical variables), are increasingly generated for the investigation of various diseases. Nevertheless, questions remain regarding the usefulness of multi-omics data for the prediction of disease outcomes such as survival time. It is also unclear which methods are…
▽ More
Multi-omics data, that is, datasets containing different types of high-dimensional molecular variables (often in addition to classical clinical variables), are increasingly generated for the investigation of various diseases. Nevertheless, questions remain regarding the usefulness of multi-omics data for the prediction of disease outcomes such as survival time. It is also unclear which methods are most appropriate to derive such prediction models. We aim to give some answers to these questions by means of a large-scale benchmark study using real data. Different prediction methods from machine learning and statistics were applied on 18 multi-omics cancer datasets from the database "The Cancer Genome Atlas", containing from 35 to 1,000 observations and from 60,000 to 100,000 variables. The considered outcome was the (censored) survival time. Twelve methods based on boosting, penalized regression and random forest were compared, comprising both methods that do and that do not take the group structure of the omics variables into account. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and a Cox model using only clinical variables were used as reference methods. The methods were compared using several repetitions of 5-fold cross-validation. Uno's C-index and the integrated Brier-score served as performance metrics. The results show that, although multi-omics data can improve the prediction performance, this is not generally the case. Only the method block forest slightly outperformed the Cox model on average over all datasets. Taking into account the multi-omics structure improves the predictive performance and protects variables in low-dimensional groups - especially clinical variables - from not being included in the model. All analyses are reproducible using freely available R code.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Lagged correlation-based deep learning for directional trend change prediction in financial time series
Authors:
Ben Moews,
J. Michael Herrmann,
Gbenga Ibikunle
Abstract:
Trend change prediction in complex systems with a large number of noisy time series is a problem with many applications for real-world phenomena, with stock markets as a notoriously difficult to predict example of such systems. We approach predictions of directional trend changes via complex lagged correlations between them, excluding any information about the target series from the respective inp…
▽ More
Trend change prediction in complex systems with a large number of noisy time series is a problem with many applications for real-world phenomena, with stock markets as a notoriously difficult to predict example of such systems. We approach predictions of directional trend changes via complex lagged correlations between them, excluding any information about the target series from the respective inputs to achieve predictions purely based on such correlations with other series. We propose the use of deep neural networks that employ step-wise linear regressions with exponential smoothing in the preparatory feature engineering for this task, with regression slopes as trend strength indicators for a given time interval. We apply this method to historical stock market data from 2011 to 2016 as a use case example of lagged correlations between large numbers of time series that are heavily influenced by externally arising new information as a random factor. The results demonstrate the viability of the proposed approach, with state-of-the-art accuracies and accounting for the statistical significance of the results for additional validation, as well as important implications for modern financial economics.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2018; v1 submitted 27 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
